Agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock and uses thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9034058
  • Patent Number
    9,034,058
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 27, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 19, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates generally to processes for preparing agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstocks of a particle size suitable for reaction in certain gasification reactors and, in particular, for coal gasification. The present invention also relates to integrated coal gasification processes including preparing and utilizing such agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstocks.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to processes for preparing agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstocks of a particle size suitable for reaction in certain gasification reactors and, in particular, for coal gasification. The present invention also relates to an integrated coal gasification process including preparing and utilizing such agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstocks.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In view of numerous factors such as higher energy prices and environmental concerns, the production of value-added products (such as pipeline-quality substitute natural gas, hydrogen, methanol, higher hydrocarbons, ammonia and electrical power) from lower-fuel-value carbonaceous feedstocks (such as petroleum coke, resids, asphaltenes, coal and biomass) is receiving renewed attention.


Such lower-fuel-value carbonaceous feedstocks can be gasified at elevated temperatures and pressures to produce a synthesis gas stream that can subsequently be converted to such value-added products.


Certain gasification processes, such as those based on partial combustion/oxidation and/or steam gasification of a carbon source at elevated temperatures and pressures (thermal gasification), generate syngas (carbon monoxide+hydrogen, lower BTU synthesis gas stream) as the primary product (little or no methane is directly produced). The syngas can be directly combusted for heat energy, and/or can be further processed to produce methane (via catalytic methanation, see reaction (III) below), hydrogen (via water-gas shift, see reaction (II) below) and/or any number of other higher hydrocarbon products.


Such lower-fuel-value carbonaceous feedstocks can alternatively be directly combusted for their heat value, typically for generating steam and electrical energy (directly or indirectly via generated steam).


In the above uses, the raw particulate feedstocks are typically processed by at least grinding to a specified particle size profile (including upper and lower end as well as dp(50) of a particle size distribution) suitable for the particular gasification operation. Typically particle size profiles will depend on the type of bed, fluidization conditions (in the case of fluidized beds, such as fluidizing medium and velocity) and other conditions such as feedstock composition and reactivity, feedstock physical properties (such as density and surface area), reactor pressure and temperature, reactor configuration (such as geometry and internals), and a variety of other factors generally recognized by those of ordinary skill in the relevant art.


“Low-rank” coals are typically softer, friable materials with a dull, earthy appearance. They are characterized by relatively higher moisture levels and relatively lower carbon content, and therefore a lower energy content. Examples of low-rank coals include peat, lignite and sub-bituminous coals. Examples of “high-rank” coals include bituminous and anthracite coals.


In addition to their relatively low heating values, the use of low-ranks coals has other drawbacks. For example, the friability of such coals can lead to high fines losses in the feedstock preparation (grinding and other processing) and in the gasification/combustion of such coals. Such fines must be managed or even disposed of, which usually means an economic and efficiency hit (economic and processing disincentive) to the use of such coals. For very highly friable coals such as lignite, such fines losses can approach or even exceed 50% of the original material. In other words, the processing and use of low-rank coals can result in a loss (or less desired use) of a material percentage of the carbon content in the low-rank coal as mined.


It would, therefore, be desirable to find a way to efficiently process low-rank coals to reduce fines losses in both the feedstock processing and ultimate conversion of such low-rank coal materials in various gasification and combustion processes.


Low-rank coals that contain significant amounts of impurities, such as sodium and chlorine (e.g., NaCl), may actually be unusable in gasification processes due to the highly corrosive and fouling nature of such components, thus requiring pretreatment to remove such impurities. Typically the addition of such a pretreatment renders the use of sodium and/or chlorine contaminated low-rank coals economically unfeasible.


It would, therefore, be desirable to find a way to more efficiently pretreat these contaminated low-rank coals to removed a substantial portion of at least the inorganic sodium and/or chlorine content.


Low-rank coals may also have elevated ash levels, and thus lower useable carbon content per unit raw feedstock.


It would, therefore, be desirable to find a way to more efficiently pretreat these low-rank coals to reduce overall ash content.


Also, low-ranks coals tend to have lower bulk density and more variability in individual particle density than high-rank coals, which can create challenges for designing and operating gasification and combustion processes.


It would, therefore, be desirable to find a way to increase both particle density and particle density consistency of low-rank coals, to ultimately improve the operability of processes that utilize such low-rank coals.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first aspect, the invention provides a process for preparing a free-flowing agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock of a specified particle size distribution, the process comprising the steps of:


(a) selecting a specification for the particle size distribution of the free-flowing agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock, the specification comprising

    • (i) a target upper end particle size of about 72600 microns of less,
    • (ii) a target lower end particle size of about 6350 microns or greater, and
    • (iii) a target dp(50) between the target upper end particle size and target lower end particle size;


(b) providing a raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock having an initial particle density;


(c) grinding the raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock to a ground dp(50) of from about 2% to about 50% of the target dp(50), to generate a ground low-rank coal feedstock;


(d) pelletizing the ground low-rank coal feedstock with water and a binder to generate free-flowing agglomerated low-rank coal particles having a pelletized dp(50) of from about 90% to about 110% of the target dp(50), and a particle density of at least about 5% greater than the initial particle density, wherein the binder is selected from the group consisting of a water-soluble binder, a water-dispersible binder and a mixture thereof; and


(e) removing about 90 wt % or greater of

    • (i) particles larger than the upper end particle size, and
    • (ii) particles smaller than the lower end particle size,


from the free-flowing agglomerated low-rank coal particles to generate the free-flowing agglomerated low-rank coal feedstock.


In a second aspect, the present invention provides a process for gasifying a low-rank coal feedstock to a raw synthesis gas stream comprising carbon monoxide and hydrogen, the process comprising the steps of:


(A) preparing a low-rank coal feedstock of a specified particle size distribution;


(B) feeding into a fixed-bed gasifying reactor

    • (i) low-rank coal feedstock prepared in step (A), and
    • (ii) a gas stream comprising one or both of steam and oxygen;


(C) reacting low-rank coal feedstock fed into gasifying reactor in step (B), at elevated temperature and pressure, with the gas stream, to generate a raw gas comprising carbon monoxide and hydrogen; and


(D) removing a stream of the raw gas generated in the gasifying reactor in step (C) as the raw synthesis gas stream,


wherein the low-rank coal feedstock comprises a free-flowing agglomerate particulate low-rank coal feedstock, and step (A) comprises the steps of:


(a) selecting a specification for the particle distribution of the free-flowing agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock, the specification comprising

    • (i) a target upper end particle size of about 72600 microns of less,
    • (ii) a target lower end particle size of about 6350 microns or greater, and
    • (iii) a target dp(50) between the target upper end particle size and target lower end particle size;


(b) providing a raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock having an initial particle density;


(c) grinding the raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock to a ground dp(50) of from about 2% to about 50% of the target dp(50), to generate a ground low-rank coal feedstock;


(d) pelletizing the ground low-rank coal feedstock with water and a binder to generate free-flowing agglomerated low-rank coal particles having a pelletized dp(50) of from about 90% to about 110% of the target dp(50), and a particle density of at least about 5% greater than the initial particle density, wherein the binder is selected from the group consisting of a water-soluble binder, a water-dispersible binder and a mixture thereof; and


(e) removing at least about 90 wt % of (i) particles larger than the upper end particle size, and (ii) particles smaller than the lower end particle size, from the free-flowing agglomerated low-rank coal particles to generate the free-flowing agglomerated low-rank coal feedstock.


The processes in accordance with the present invention are useful, for example, for more efficiently producing higher-value products and by-products from various low-rank coal materials at a reduced capital and operating intensity, and greater overall process efficiency.


These and other embodiments, features and advantages of the present invention will be more readily understood by those of ordinary skill in the art from a reading of the following detailed description.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a general diagram of an embodiment of a process for preparing a free-flowing agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock in accordance with the first aspect present invention.



FIG. 2 is a general diagram of an embodiment of a gasification process in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention relates to processes for preparing feedstocks from low-rank coals that are suitable for use in certain gasification processes, and for converting those feedstocks ultimately into one or more value-added products. Further details are provided below.


In the context of the present description, all publications, patent applications, patents and other references mentioned herein, if not otherwise indicated, are explicitly incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes as if fully set forth.


Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control.


Except where expressly noted, trademarks are shown in upper case.


Unless stated otherwise, all percentages, parts, ratios, etc., are by weight.


Unless stated otherwise, pressures expressed in psi units are gauge, and pressures expressed in kPa units are absolute. Pressure differences, however, are expressed as absolute (for example, pressure 1 is 25 psi higher than pressure 2).


When an amount, concentration, or other value or parameter is given as a range, or a list of upper and lower values, this is to be understood as specifically disclosing all ranges formed from any pair of any upper and lower range limits, regardless of whether ranges are separately disclosed. Where a range of numerical values is recited herein, unless otherwise stated, the range is intended to include the endpoints thereof, and all integers and fractions within the range. It is not intended that the scope of the present disclosure be limited to the specific values recited when defining a range.


When the term “about” is used in describing a value or an end-point of a range, the disclosure should be understood to include the specific value or end-point referred to.


As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but can include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.


Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” and “and/or” refers to an inclusive and not to an exclusive. For example, a condition A or B, or A and/or B, is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).


The use of “a” or “an” to describe the various elements and components herein is merely for convenience and to give a general sense of the disclosure. This description should be read to include one or at least one and the singular also includes the plural unless it is obvious that it is meant otherwise.


The term “substantial”, as used herein, unless otherwise defined herein, means that greater than about 90% of the referenced material, preferably greater than about 95% of the referenced material, and more preferably greater than about 97% of the referenced material. If not specified, the percent is on a molar basis when reference is made to a molecule (such as methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide), and otherwise is on a weight basis (such as for carbon content).


The term “predominant portion”, as used herein, unless otherwise defined herein, means that greater than 50% of the referenced material. If not specified, the percent is on a molar basis when reference is made to a molecule (such as hydrogen, methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide), and otherwise is on a weight basis (such as for carbon content).


The term “depleted” is synonymous with reduced from originally present. For example, removing a substantial portion of a material from a stream would produce a material-depleted stream that is substantially depleted of that material. Conversely, the term “enriched” is synonymous with greater than originally present.


The term “carbonaceous” as used herein is synonymous with hydrocarbon.


The term “carbonaceous material” as used herein is a material containing organic hydrocarbon content. Carbonaceous materials can be classified as biomass or non-biomass materials as defined herein.


The term “biomass” as used herein refers to carbonaceous materials derived from recently (for example, within the past 100 years) living organisms, including plant-based biomass and animal-based biomass. For clarification, biomass does not include fossil-based carbonaceous materials, such as coal. For example, see US2009/0217575A1, US2009/0229182A1 and US2009/0217587A1.


The term “plant-based biomass” as used herein means materials derived from green plants, crops, algae, and trees, such as, but not limited to, sweet sorghum, bagasse, sugarcane, bamboo, hybrid poplar, hybrid willow, albizia trees, eucalyptus, alfalfa, clover, oil palm, switchgrass, sudangrass, millet, jatropha, and miscanthus (e.g., Miscanthus×giganteus). Biomass further include wastes from agricultural cultivation, processing, and/or degradation such as corn cobs and husks, corn stover, straw, nut shells, vegetable oils, canola oil, rapeseed oil, biodiesels, tree bark, wood chips, sawdust, and yard wastes.


The term “animal-based biomass” as used herein means wastes generated from animal cultivation and/or utilization. For example, biomass includes, but is not limited to, wastes from livestock cultivation and processing such as animal manure, guano, poultry litter, animal fats, and municipal solid wastes (e.g., sewage).


The term “non-biomass”, as used herein, means those carbonaceous materials which are not encompassed by the term “biomass” as defined herein. For example, non-biomass include, but is not limited to, anthracite, bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal, lignite, petroleum coke, asphaltenes, liquid petroleum residues or mixtures thereof. For example, see US2009/0166588A1, US2009/0165379A1, US2009/0165380A1, US2009/0165361A1, US2009/0217590A1 and US2009/0217586A1.


“Liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials” are viscous liquid or semi-solid materials that are flowable at ambient conditions or can be made flowable at elevated temperature conditions. These materials are typically the residue from the processing of hydrocarbon materials such as crude oil. For example, the first step in the refining of crude oil is normally a distillation to separate the complex mixture of hydrocarbons into fractions of differing volatility. A typical first-step distillation requires heating at atmospheric pressure to vaporize as much of the hydrocarbon content as possible without exceeding an actual temperature of about 650° F. (about 343° C.), since higher temperatures may lead to thermal decomposition. The fraction which is not distilled at atmospheric pressure is commonly referred to as “atmospheric petroleum residue”. The fraction may be further distilled under vacuum, such that an actual temperature of up to about 650° F. (about 343° C.) can vaporize even more material. The remaining undistillable liquid is referred to as “vacuum petroleum residue”. Both atmospheric petroleum residue and vacuum petroleum residue are considered liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials for the purposes of the present invention.


Non-limiting examples of liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials include vacuum resids; atmospheric resids; heavy and reduced petroleum crude oils; pitch, asphalt and bitumen (naturally occurring as well as resulting from petroleum refining processes); tar sand oil; shale oil; bottoms from catalytic cracking processes; coal liquefaction bottoms; and other hydrocarbon feedstreams containing significant amounts of heavy or viscous materials such as petroleum wax fractions.


The term “asphaltene” as used herein is an aromatic carbonaceous solid at room temperature, and can be derived, for example, from the processing of crude oil and crude oil tar sands. Asphaltenes may also be considered liquid heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks.


The liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials may inherently contain minor amounts of solid carbonaceous materials, such as petroleum coke and/or solid asphaltenes, that are generally dispersed within the liquid heavy hydrocarbon matrix, and that remain solid at the elevated temperature conditions utilized as the feed conditions for the present process.


The terms “petroleum coke” and “petcoke” as used herein include both (i) the solid thermal decomposition product of high-boiling hydrocarbon fractions obtained in petroleum processing (heavy residues—“resid petcoke”); and (ii) the solid thermal decomposition product of processing tar sands (bituminous sands or oil sands—“tar sands petcoke”). Such carbonization products include, for example, green, calcined, needle and fluidized bed petcoke.


Resid petcoke can also be derived from a crude oil, for example, by coking processes used for upgrading heavy-gravity residual crude oil (such as a liquid petroleum residue), which petcoke contains ash as a minor component, typically about 1.0 wt % or less, and more typically about 0.5 wt % of less, based on the weight of the coke. Typically, the ash in such lower-ash cokes predominantly comprises metals such as nickel and vanadium.


Tar sands petcoke can be derived from an oil sand, for example, by coking processes used for upgrading oil sand. Tar sands petcoke contains ash as a minor component, typically in the range of about 2 wt % to about 12 wt %, and more typically in the range of about 4 wt % to about 12 wt %, based on the overall weight of the tar sands petcoke. Typically, the ash in such higher-ash cokes predominantly comprises materials such as silica and/or alumina.


Petroleum coke can comprise at least about 70 wt % carbon, at least about 80 wt % carbon, or at least about 90 wt % carbon, based on the total weight of the petroleum coke. Typically, the petroleum coke comprises less than about 20 wt % inorganic compounds, based on the weight of the petroleum coke.


The term “coal” as used herein means peat, lignite, sub-bituminous coal, bituminous coal, anthracite, or mixtures thereof. In certain embodiments, the coal has a carbon content of less than about 85%, or less than about 80%, or less than about 75%, or less than about 70%, or less than about 65%, or less than about 60%, or less than about 55%, or less than about 50% by weight, based on the total coal weight. In other embodiments, the coal has a carbon content ranging up to about 85%, or up to about 80%, or up to about 75% by weight, based on the total coal weight. Examples of useful coal include, but are not limited to, Illinois #6, Pittsburgh #8, Beulah (ND), Utah Blind Canyon, and Powder River Basin (PRB) coals. Anthracite, bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal, and lignite coal may contain about 10 wt %, from about 5 to about 7 wt %, from about 4 to about 8 wt %, and from about 9 to about 11 wt %, ash by total weight of the coal on a dry basis, respectively. However, the ash content of any particular coal source will depend on the rank and source of the coal, as is familiar to those skilled in the art. See, for example, “Coal Data: A Reference”, Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels, U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/EIA-0064(93), February 1995.


The ash produced from combustion of a coal typically comprises both a fly ash and a bottom ash, as is familiar to those skilled in the art. The fly ash from a bituminous coal can comprise from about 20 to about 60 wt % silica and from about 5 to about 35 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the fly ash. The fly ash from a sub-bituminous coal can comprise from about 40 to about 60 wt % silica and from about 20 to about 30 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the fly ash. The fly ash from a lignite coal can comprise from about 15 to about 45 wt % silica and from about 20 to about 25 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the fly ash. See, for example, Meyers, et al. “Fly Ash. A Highway Construction Material,” Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-IP-76-16, Washington, D.C., 1976.


The bottom ash from a bituminous coal can comprise from about 40 to about 60 wt % silica and from about 20 to about 30 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the bottom ash. The bottom ash from a sub-bituminous coal can comprise from about 40 to about 50 wt % silica and from about 15 to about 25 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the bottom ash. The bottom ash from a lignite coal can comprise from about 30 to about 80 wt % silica and from about 10 to about 20 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the bottom ash. See, for example, Moulton, Lyle K. “Bottom Ash and Boiler Slag,” Proceedings of the Third International Ash Utilization Symposium, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Information Circular No. 8640, Washington, D.C., 1973.


A material such as methane can be biomass or non-biomass under the above definitions depending on its source of origin.


A “non-gaseous” material is substantially a liquid, semi-solid, solid or mixture at ambient conditions. For example, coal, petcoke, asphaltene and liquid petroleum residue are non-gaseous materials, while methane and natural gas are gaseous materials.


The term “unit” refers to a unit operation. When more than one “unit” is described as being present, those units are operated in a parallel fashion unless otherwise stated. A single “unit”, however, may comprise more than one of the units in series, or in parallel, depending on the context. For example, a cyclone unit may comprise an internal cyclone followed in series by an external cyclone. As another example, a pelletizing unit may comprise a first pelletizer to pelletize to a first particle size/particle density, followed in series by a second pelletizer to pelletize to a second particle size/particle density.


The term “free-flowing” particles as used herein means that the particles do not materially agglomerate (for example, do not materially aggregate, cake or clump) due to moisture content, as is well understood by those of ordinary skill in the relevant art. Free-flowing particles need not be “dry” but, desirably, the moisture content of the particles is substantially internally contained so that there is minimal (or no) surface moisture.


The term “a portion of the carbonaceous feedstock” refers to carbon content of unreacted feedstock as well as partially reacted feedstock, as well as other components that may be derived in whole or part from the carbonaceous feedstock (such as carbon monoxide, hydrogen and methane). For example, “a portion of the carbonaceous feedstock” includes carbon content that may be present in by-product char and recycled fines, which char is ultimately derived from the original carbonaceous feedstock.


The term “superheated steam” in the context of the present invention refers to a steam stream that is non-condensing under the conditions utilized, as is commonly understood by persons of ordinary skill in the relevant art.


The term “dry saturated steam” or “dry steam” in the context of the present invention refers to slightly superheated saturated steam that is non-condensing, as is commonly understood by persons of ordinary skill in the relevant art.


The term “HGI” refers to the Hardgrove Grinding Index as measured in accordance with ASTM D409/D409M-11ae1.


The term “dp(50)” refers to the mean particle size of a particle size distribution as measured in accordance with ASTM D4749-87(2007).


The term “particle density” refers to particle density as measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry in accordance with ASTM D4284-12.


When describing particles sizes, the use of “+” means greater than or equal to (e.g., approximate minimum), and the use of “−” means less than or equal to (e.g., approximate maximum).


Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure, suitable methods and materials are described herein. The materials, methods, and examples herein are thus illustrative only and, except as specifically stated, are not intended to be limiting.


General Feedstock Preparation Process Information


The present invention in part is directed to various processes for preparing free-flowing agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstocks suitable for certain fixed/moving bed gasification processes.


Typically, in fixed/moving bed gasification applications, a generally coarse particle is utilized but is constrained to upper and lower particles limits of about 72600 microns and about 6350 microns, respectively.


The present invention provides in step (a) the setting of the desired final particle size distribution for the end use of the ultimate free-flowing agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock, including the target dp(50), target upper end particle size (large or “bigs”) and target lower end particle size (small or “fines”). Typically, the target upper end particle size should be at least 200%, or at least three 300%, and in some cases up to 1000%, of the target dp(50); and the target lower end particle size should be no greater than 50%, or no greater than 33%, and in some cases no less than 10%, of the target dp(50).


A person of ordinary skill in the relevant end-use art will readily be able to determine the desired particle size profile for the desired end use. For example, the desired particle size profile for certain gasification processes is detailed below.


In step (b) the raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock is provided.


The term “low-rank coal” is generally understood by those of ordinary skill in the relevant art. Low-rank coals include typical sub-bituminous coals, as well as lignites and peats. Low-ranks coals are generally considered to be “younger” coals than high-rank bituminous coal and anthracite, and tend to have lower particle density, higher porosity, lower fixed carbon content, higher moisture content, higher volatile content and, in many cases, higher inorganic ash content than such high rank coals.


In one embodiment, a raw “low-rank coal” has an inherent (total) moisture content of about 25 wt % or greater (as measured in accordance with ASTM D7582-10e1), a heating value of about 6500 kcal/kg (dry basis) or less (as measured in accordance with ASTM D5865-11a), and a fixed carbon content of about 45 wt % or less (as measured in accordance with ASTM D7582-10e1).


Low-rank coals include typical sub-bituminous coals, as well as lignites and peats. Low-ranks coals are generally considered to be “younger” coals than high-rank bituminous coal and anthracite, and tend to have lower particle density, higher porosity, lower fixed carbon content, higher moisture content, higher volatile content and, in many cases, higher inorganic ash content than such high rank coals.


Typically, the raw low-rank particulate coal feedstocks will have an HGI of about 50 or greater. An embodiment of a low-rank coal for use in the present invention is a coal with an HGI of about 70 or greater, or from about 70 to about 130. In one embodiment, the low-rank coal is a lignite.


Typically, the raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock for use in the present processes will be substantially low-rank coal, or only low-rank coal. Mixtures of two or more different low-rank coals may also be used.


Mixtures of a predominant amount one or more low-rank coals with a minor amount of one or more other non-gaseous carbonaceous feedstocks may also be used as the raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock. Such other non-gaseous feedstocks include, for example, high-rank coals, petroleum coke, liquid petroleum residues, asphaltenes and biomass. In the event of a combination of a low-rank coal with another type of non-gaseous carbonaceous material, to be considered a “raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock” for the purposes of the present invention, the heating value from the low-rank coal component must be the predominant portion of the combination. Expressed another way, the overall heating value of the raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock is greater than 50%, or greater than about 66%, or greater than about 75%, or greater than about 90%, from a low-rank coal source.


As discussed in more detail below, certain other non-gaseous carbonaceous materials may be added at various other steps in the process. For example, such materials may be used to assist in the pelletizing (binding) of the ground low-rank coal feedstock, such as liquid petroleum residues, asphaltenes and certain biomasses such as chicken manure.


The raw low-rank coal feedstock provided in step (b) is then processed by the grinding to a small particle size, pelletizing to the desired end particle size and then a final sizing, an embodiment of which is depicted in FIG. 1.


In accordance with that embodiment, a raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock (10) is processed in a feedstock preparation unit (100) to generate a ground low-rank coal feedstock (32), which is combined with a binder (35), pelletized and finally sized in a pelletization unit (350), to generate the free-flowing agglomerated low-rank coal feedstock (32+35) in accordance with the present invention.


Feedstock preparation unit (100) utilizes a grinding step, and may utilize other optional operations including but not limited to a washing step to remove certain impurities from the ground low-rank, and a dewatering step to adjust the water content for subsequent pelletization.


In the grinding step, the raw low-rank coal feedstock (10) can be crushed, ground and/or pulverized in a grinding unit (110) according to any methods known in the art, such as impact crushing and wet or dry grinding to yield a raw ground low-rank coal feedstock (21) of a particle size suitable for subsequent pelletization, which is typically to dp(50) of from about 2%, or from about 5%, or from about 10%, up to about 50%, or to about 40%, or to about 33%, or to about 25%, of the ultimate target dp(50).


The particulate raw low-rank coal feedstock (10) as provided to the grinding step may be as taken directly from a mine or may be initially processed, for example, by a coarse crushing to a particle size sufficiently large to be more finely ground in the grinding step.


Unlike typical grinding processes, the ground low-rank coal feedstock (21) is not sized directly after grinding to remove fines, but is used as ground for subsequent pelletization. In other words, in accordance with the present invention, the raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock (10) is completely ground down to a smaller particle size then reconstituted (agglomerated) up to the target particle size.


The present process thus utilizes substantially all (about 90 wt % or greater, or about 95 wt % or greater, or about 98 wt % or greater) of the carbon content of the particulate raw low-rank coal feedstock (10), as opposed to separating out fine or coarse material that would otherwise need to be separately processed (or disposed of) in conventional grinding operations. In other words, the ultimate free-flowing agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock contains about 90 wt % or greater, or about 95 wt % or greater, or about 98 wt % or greater, of the carbon content of the raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock (10), and there is virtually complete usage of the carbon content (heating value) of the particulate raw low-rank coal feedstock (10) brought into the process.


In one embodiment, the particulate raw low-rank coal feedstock (10) is wet ground by adding an aqueous medium (40) into the grinding process. Examples of suitable methods for wet grinding of coal feedstocks are well known to those of ordinary skilled in the relevant art.


In another embodiment, an acid is added in the wet grinding process in order to break down at least a portion of the inorganic ash that may be present in the particulate raw low-rank coal feedstock (10), rendering those inorganic ash components water-soluble so that they can be removed in a subsequent wash stage (as discussed below). This is particularly useful for preparing feedstocks for hydromethanation and other catalytic processes, as certain of the ash components (for example, silica and alumina) may bind the alkali metal catalysts that are typically used for hydromethanation, rendering those catalysts inactive. Suitable acids include hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid and nitric acid, and are typically utilized in minor amounts sufficient to lower the pH of the aqueous grinding media to a point where the detrimental ash components will at least partially dissolve.


The raw ground low-rank coal feedstock (21) may then optionally be sent to a washing unit (120) where it is contacted with an aqueous medium (41) to remove various water-soluble contaminants, which are withdrawn as a wastewater stream (42), and generate a washed ground low-rank coal feedstock (22). The washing step is particularly useful for treating coals contaminated with inorganic sodium and inorganic chlorine (for example, with high NaCl content), as both sodium and chlorine are highly detrimental contaminants in gasification and combustion processes, as well as removing ash constituents that may have been rendered water soluble via the optional acid treatment in the grinding stage (as discussed above).


Examples of suitable coal washing processes are well known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art. One such process involves utilizing one or a series of vacuum belt filters, where the ground coal is transported on a vacuum belt while it is sprayed with an aqueous medium, typically recycle water recovered from the treatment of wastewater streams from the process (for example, wastewater stream (42)). Additives such as surfactants, flocculants and pelletizing aids can also be applied at this stage. For example, surfactants and flocculants can be applied to assist in dewatering in the vacuum belt filters and/or any subsequent dewatering stages.


The resulting washed ground low-rank coal feedstock (22) will typically be in the form of a wet filter cake or concentrated slurry with a water content that will typically require an additional dewatering stage (dewatering unit (130)) to remove a portion of the water content and generate a ground low-rank coal feedstock (32) having a water content suitable for the subsequent pelletization in pelletization unit (350).


Methods and equipment suitable for dewatering wet coal filter cakes and concentrated coal slurries in this dewatering stage are well-known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art and include, for example, filtration (gravity or vacuum), centrifugation, fluid press and thermal drying (hot air and/or steam) methods and equipment. Hydrophobic organic compounds and solvents having an affinity for the coal particles can be used to promote dewatering.


A wastewater steam (43) generated from the dewatering stage can, for example, be recycled to washing unit (120) and/or sent for wastewater treatment. Any water recovered from treatment of wastewater stream (43) can be recycled for use elsewhere in the process.


The result from feedstock preparation unit (100) is a ground low-rank coal feedstock (32) of an appropriate particle size and moisture content suitable for pelletization and further processing in pelletization unit (350).


Additional fines materials of appropriate particle size from other sources (not depicted) can be added into the feedstock preparation unit (100) at various places, and/or combined with ground low-rank coal feedstock (32). For example, fines materials from other coal and/or petcoke processing operations can be combined with ground low-rank coal feedstock (32) to modify (e.g., further reduce) the water content of ground low-rank coal feedstock (32) and/or increase the carbon content of the same.


Pelletization unit (350) utilizes a pelletizing step and a final sizing step, and may utilize other optional operations including but not limited to a dewatering step to adjust the water content for ultimate use.


Pelletizing step utilizes a pelletizing unit (140) to agglomerate the ground low-rank coal feedstock (32) in an aqueous environment with the aid of a binder (35) that is water-soluble or water-dispersible. The agglomeration is mechanically performed by any one or combination of pelletizers well known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art. Examples of such pelletizers include pin mixers, disc pelletizers and drum pelletizers. In one embodiment, the pelletization is a two-stage pelletization performed by a first type of pelletizer followed in series by a second type of pelletizer, for example a pin mixer followed by a disc and/or drum pelletizer, which combination allows better control of ultimate particle size and densification of the agglomerated low-rank coal particles.


Suitable binders are also well-known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art and include organic and inorganic binders. Organic binders include, for example, various starches, flocculants, natural and synthetic polymers, biomass such as chicken manure, and dispersed/emulsified oil materials such as a dispersed liquid petroleum resid.


Inorganic binders include mineral binders. In one embodiment, the binder material is an alkali metal which is provided as an alkali metal compound, and particularly a potassium compound such as potassium hydroxide and/or potassium carbonate, which is particularly useful in catalytic steam gasification and hydromethanation processes as the alkali metal serves as the catalyst for those reactions (discussed below). In those steam gasification and hydromethanation processes where the alkali metal catalyst is recovered and recycled, the binder can comprise recycled alkali metal compounds along with makeup catalyst as required.


The pelletizing step should result in wet agglomerated low-rank coal particles (23) having a dp(50) as close to the target dp(50) as possible, but generally at least in the range of from about 90% to about 110% of the target dp(50). Desirably the wet agglomerated low-rank coal particles (23) have a dp(50) in the range of from about 95% to about 105% of the target dp(50).


Depending on the moisture content of the wet agglomerated low-rank coal particles (23), those particles may or may not be free flowing, and/or may not be structurally stable, and/or may have too high a moisture content for the desired end use, and may optionally need to go through an additional dewatering stage in a dewatering unit (150) to generate a dewatered agglomerated low-rank coal feedstock (24). Methods suitable for dewatering the wet agglomerated low-rank coal particles (32) in dewatering stage are well-known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art and include, for example, filtration (gravity or vacuum), centrifugation, fluid press and thermal drying (hot air and/or steam). In one embodiment, the wet agglomerated low-rank coal particles (23) are thermally dried, desirably with dry or superheated steam.


A wastewater steam (44) generated from the dewatering stage can, for example, be recycled to pelletizing step (140) (along with binder (35)) and/or sent for wastewater treatment. Any water recovered from treatment of wastewater stream (44) can be recycled for use elsewhere in the process.


The pelletization unit (350) includes a final sizing stage in a sizing unit (160), where all or a portion of particles above a target upper end size (large or “bigs”) and below a target lower end particle size (fines or “smalls”) are removed to result in the free-flowing agglomerated low-rank coal feedstock (32+35). Methods suitable for sizing are generally known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art, and typically include screening units with appropriately sized screens. In one embodiment, at least 90 wt %, or at least 95 wt %, of either or both (desirably) of the bigs and smalls are removed in this final sizing stage.


In order to maximize carbon usage and minimize waste, the particles above the target upper end size are desirably recovered as stream (26) and recycled directly back to grinding unit (110), and/or may be ground in a separate grinding unit (170) to generate a ground bigs stream (27) which can be recycled directly back into pelletizing unit (140). Likewise, the particles below the target lower end size are desirably recovered as stream (25) and recycled directly back to pelletizing unit (140).


Other than any thermal drying, all operations in the feedstock preparation stage generally take place under ambient temperature and pressure conditions. In one embodiment, however, the washing stage can take place under elevated temperature conditions (for example, using heated wash water) to promote dissolution of contaminants being remove during the washing process.


The resulting free-flowing agglomerated low-rank coal feedstock (32+35) will advantageously have increased particle density as compared to the initial particle density of the raw particulate low rank feedstock. The resulting particle density should be at least about 5% greater, or at least about 10% greater, than the initial particle density of the raw particulate low rank feedstock.


In one embodiment, the resulting free-flowing agglomerated low-rank coal feedstock has a target dp(50)


Gasification Processes


Processes that can utilize the agglomerated low-rank coal feedstocks in accordance with the present invention include certain gasification processes.


As a general concept, gasification processes convert the carbon in a carbonaceous feedstock to a raw synthesis gas stream that will generally contain carbon monoxide and hydrogen, and may also contain various amounts of methane and carbon dioxide depending on the particular gasification process. The raw synthesis gas stream may also contain other components such as unreacted steam, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and other contaminants again depending on the particular gasification process, as well as any co-reactants and feedstocks utilized.


The raw synthesis gas stream is generated in a gasification reactor. Suitable gasification technologies are generally known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art, and many applicable technologies are commercially available.


Non-limiting examples of different types of suitable gasification processes are discussed below. These may be used individually or in combination. All synthesis gas generation process will involve a reactor, which is generically depicted as (180) in FIG. 2, where the free-flowing agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock (or a pyrolyzed or devolatized char thereof) will be reacted to produce the raw synthesis gas stream. General reference can be made to FIG. 2 in the context of the various synthesis gas generating processes described below.


In one embodiment, the gasification process is based on a thermal gasification process, such as a partial oxidation gasification process where oxygen and/or steam is utilized as the oxidant, such as a steam gasification process.


Gasifiers potentially suitable for use in conjunction with the present invention are, in a general sense, known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art and include, for example, those based on technologies available from Lurgi AG (Sasol) and others.


As applied to coal, and referring to FIG. 2, these processes convert an agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock (32+35), or a pyrolyzed or devolatized char thereof, in a reactor (180) such as an oxygen-blown gasifier or steam gasifier, into a syngas (hydrogen plus carbon monoxide) as a raw synthesis gas stream (195) which, depending on the specific process and carbonaceous feedstock, will have differing ratios of hydrogen:carbon monoxide, will generally contain minor amounts of carbon dioxide, and may contain minor amounts of other gaseous components such as methane, steam, tars, hydrogen sulfide, sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides.


Depending on the particular process, the agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock (32+35) may be fed into reactor (180) at one or more different locations optimized for the particular gasification process, as will be recognized by a person of ordinary skill in the relevant art.


In certain of these processes, air or an oxygen-enriched gas stream (14) is fed into the reactor (180) along with the agglomerated feedstock (32+35). Optionally, steam (12) may also be fed into the reactor (180), as well as other gases such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen, methane and/or nitrogen.


In certain of these processes, steam (12) may be utilized as an oxidant at elevated temperatures in place of all or a part of the air or oxygen-enrich gas stream (14).


The gasification in the reactor (180) will typically occur in a bed (182) of the agglomerated feedstock (32+35) which is contacted by air or oxygen-enrich gas stream (14), steam (12) and/or other gases (like carbon dioxide and/or nitrogen) that may be fed to reactor (180).


In one embodiment (the Lurgi process as mentioned below), gasification takes place in a bed (182), which is referred in the literature as a “fixed” bed or a “moving” bed, which is not fluidized in the sense of a fluidized-bed reactor.


Typically, thermal gasification is a non-catalytic process, so no gasification catalyst needs to be added to the agglomerated feedstock (32+35) or into the reactor (180); however, a catalyst that promotes syngas formation may be utilized.


Typically, carbon conversion is very high in thermal gasification processes, and any residual residues are predominantly inorganic ash with little or no carbon residue. Depending on reaction conditions, thermal gasification may be slagging or non-slagging, where a residue (197) is withdrawn from reactor (180) as a molten (slagging) or solid (non-slagging) ash or char (to the extent there is still appreciable carbon content in the residue). Typically the residue (197) is collected in a section (186) below bed (182) and a grid plate (188) and withdrawn from the bottom or reactor (180), but ash/char may also be withdrawn from the top (184) of reactor (180) along with raw synthesis gas stream (195).


The raw synthesis gas stream (195) is typically withdrawn from the top or upper portion of reactor (180).


The hot gas effluent leaving bed (182) of reactor (180) can pass through a fines remover unit (such as cyclone assembly (190)), incorporated into and/or external of reactor (180), which serves as a disengagement zone. Particles too heavy to be entrained by the gas leaving the reactor (180) can be returned to the reactor (180), for example, to bed (182).


Residual entrained fines are substantially removed by any suitable device such as internal and/or external cyclone separators (190) optionally followed by Venturi scrubbers to generate a fines-depleted raw product stream (193). At least a portion of these fines can be returned to bed (182) via recycle lines (192), (194) and/or (196), particularly to the extent that such fines still contain material carbon content (can be considered char). Alternatively, any fines or ash can be removed via lines (192) and (198).


These thermal gasification processes are typically operated under relatively high temperature and pressure conditions and, as indicated above, may run under slagging or non-slagging operating conditions depending on the process and carbonaceous feedstock.


For example, the Lurgi gasifier has a fixed/moving-bed section that operates at a temperature of from about 750° C. to about 1000° C. and a pressure of from about 150 psig (1136 kPa) to about 600 psig (4238 kPa). Suitable particle sizes are relatively coarse, ranging from about +6350 microns to about −76200 microns, with minimal amounts of particles −6350 microns present due to significant processing/fouling issues with smaller particles. The target dp(50) for the Lurgi process is between the target upper and lower particle sizes as discussed above. See, for example, WO2006/082543A1 and US2009/0158658A1.


Reaction and other operating conditions, and equipment and configurations, of the various reactors and technologies are in a general sense known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art, and are not critical to the present invention in its broadest sense.


Multi-Train Processes


In the processes of the invention, each process may be performed in one or more processing units. For example, one or more gasification reactors may be supplied with the feedstock from one or more feedstock preparation unit operations. Similarly, the raw product streams generated by one or more reactors may be processed or purified separately or via their combination at various downstream points depending on the particular system configuration.


In certain embodiments, the processes utilize two or more gasification reactors. In such embodiments, the processes may contain divergent processing units (i.e., less than the total number of gasification reactors) prior to the reactors for ultimately providing the carbonaceous feedstock to the plurality of reactors, and/or convergent processing units (i.e., less than the total number of hydromethanation reactors) following the reactors for processing the plurality of raw gas streams generated by the plurality of reactors.


When the systems contain convergent processing units, each of the convergent processing units can be selected to have a capacity to accept greater than a 1/n portion of the total feed stream to the convergent processing units, where n is the number of convergent processing units. Similarly, when the systems contain divergent processing units, each of the divergent processing units can be selected to have a capacity to accept greater than a 1/m portion of the total feed stream supplying the convergent processing units, where m is the number of divergent processing units.

Claims
  • 1. A process for preparing a free-flowing agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock of a specified particle size distribution, the process comprising the steps of: (a) selecting a specification for the particle size distribution of the free-flowing agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock, the specification comprising (i) a target upper end particle size of about 72600 microns of less,(ii) a target lower end particle size of about 6350 microns or greater, and(iii) a target dp(50) between the target upper end particle size and target lower end particle size;(b) providing a raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock having an initial particle density;(c) grinding the raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock to a ground dp(50) of from about 2% to about 50% of the target dp(50), to generate a ground low-rank coal feedstock;(d) pelletizing the ground low-rank coal feedstock with water and a binder to generate free-flowing agglomerated low-rank coal particles having a pelletized dp(50) of from about 90% to about 110% of the target dp(50), and a particle density of at least about 5% greater than the initial particle density, wherein the binder is selected from the group consisting of a water-soluble binder, a water-dispersible binder and a mixture thereof; and(e) removing about 90 wt % or greater of (i) particles larger than the upper end particle size, and(ii) particles smaller than the lower end particle size,
  • 2. The process of claim 1, wherein the raw low-rank particulate coal feedstock has a Hardgrove Grinding Index of about 50 or greater.
  • 3. The process of claim 2, wherein the raw low-rank particulate coal feedstock has a Hardgrove Grinding Index of about 70 or greater.
  • 4. The process of claim 3, wherein the raw low-rank particulate coal feedstock has a Hardgrove Grinding Index of from about 70 to about 130.
  • 5. The process of claim 1, wherein the grinding step is a wet grinding step.
  • 6. The process of claim 5, wherein an acid is added in the wet grinding step.
  • 7. The process of claim 1, wherein the process further comprises the step of washing the raw ground low-rank coal feedstock from the grinding step to generate a washed ground low-rank coal feedstock.
  • 8. The process of claim 7, wherein the raw ground low-rank coal feedstock is washed to remove one or both of inorganic sodium and inorganic chlorine.
  • 9. The process of claim 7, wherein the washed ground low-rank coal has a water content, and the process further comprises the step of removing a portion of the water content from the washed ground low-rank coal feedstock to generate the ground low-rank coal feedstock for the pelletizing step.
  • 10. The process of claim 1, wherein the pelletization is a two-stage pelletization performed by a first type of pelletizer followed in series by a second type of pelletizer.
  • 11. The process of claim 1, wherein the particle density of the free-flowing agglomerated low-rank coal particles is at least about 10% greater than the initial particle density.
  • 12. The process of claim 1, wherein the raw particulate low-rank coal feedstock is ground to a ground dp(50) of from about 5% to about 50% of the target dp(50).
  • 13. A process for gasifying a low-rank coal feedstock to a raw synthesis gas stream comprising carbon monoxide and hydrogen, the process comprising the steps of: (A) preparing a low-rank coal feedstock of a specified particle size distribution;(B) feeding into a fixed-bed gasifying reactor (i) low-rank coal feedstock prepared in step (A), and(ii) a gas stream comprising one or both of steam and oxygen;(C) reacting low-rank coal feedstock fed into gasifying reactor in step (B), at elevated temperature and pressure, with the gas stream, to generate a raw gas comprising carbon monoxide and hydrogen; and(D) removing a stream of the raw gas generated in the gasifying reactor in step (C) as the raw synthesis gas stream,wherein step (A) comprises the process as set forth in claim 1.
  • 14. The process of claim 13, wherein step (A) comprises the process as set forth in claim 2.
  • 15. The process of claim 14, wherein step (A) comprises the process as set forth in claim 3.
  • 16. The process of claim 15, wherein step (A) comprises the process as set forth in claim 4.
  • 17. The process of claim 15, wherein step (A) comprises the process as set forth in claim 10.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 61/708,104 (filed 1 Oct. 2012) and 61/775,775 (filed 11 Mar. 2013), the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein for all purposes as if fully set forth. This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/039,321, entitled AGGLOMERATED PARTICULATE LOW-RANK COAL FEEDSTOCK AND USES THEREOF), U.S. application Ser. No. 14/039,402, entitled AGGLOMERATED PARTICULATE LOW-RANK COAL FEEDSTOCK AND USES THEREOF), and U.S. application Ser. No. 14/040,058, entitled USE OF CONTAMINATED LOW-RANK COAL FOR COMBUSTION), all of which are concurrently filed herewith and incorporated by reference herein for all purposes as if fully set forth.

US Referenced Citations (383)
Number Name Date Kind
2605215 Coghlan Jul 1952 A
2694623 Welty, Jr. et al. Nov 1954 A
2791549 Jahnig May 1957 A
2813126 Tierney Nov 1957 A
2860959 Pettyjohn et al. Nov 1958 A
2866405 Benson et al. May 1959 A
3034848 King May 1962 A
3114930 Oldham et al. Dec 1963 A
3150716 Strelzoff et al. Sep 1964 A
3164330 Neidl Jan 1965 A
3351563 Negra et al. Nov 1967 A
3435590 Smith Apr 1969 A
3531917 Grunewald et al. Oct 1970 A
3544291 Schlinger et al. Dec 1970 A
3594985 Ameen et al. Jul 1971 A
3615300 Holm et al. Oct 1971 A
3689240 Aldridge et al. Sep 1972 A
3740193 Aldridge et al. Jun 1973 A
3746522 Donath Jul 1973 A
3759036 White Sep 1973 A
3779725 Hegarty et al. Dec 1973 A
3814725 Zimmerman et al. Jun 1974 A
3817725 Sieg et al. Jun 1974 A
3828474 Quartulli Aug 1974 A
3833327 Pitzer et al. Sep 1974 A
3847567 Kalina et al. Nov 1974 A
3876393 Kasai et al. Apr 1975 A
3904386 Graboski et al. Sep 1975 A
3915670 Lacey et al. Oct 1975 A
3920229 Piggott Nov 1975 A
3929431 Koh et al. Dec 1975 A
3958957 Koh et al. May 1976 A
3966875 Bratzler et al. Jun 1976 A
3969089 Moss et al. Jul 1976 A
3971639 Matthews Jul 1976 A
3972693 Wiesner et al. Aug 1976 A
3975168 Gorbaty Aug 1976 A
3985519 Kalina et al. Oct 1976 A
3989811 Hill Nov 1976 A
3996014 Muller et al. Dec 1976 A
3998607 Wesswlhoft et al. Dec 1976 A
3999607 Pennington et al. Dec 1976 A
4005996 Hausberger et al. Feb 1977 A
4011066 Bratzler et al. Mar 1977 A
4017272 Anwer et al. Apr 1977 A
4021370 Harris et al. May 1977 A
4025423 Stonner et al. May 1977 A
4044098 Miller et al. Aug 1977 A
4046523 Kalina et al. Sep 1977 A
4052176 Child et al. Oct 1977 A
4053554 Reed et al. Oct 1977 A
4057512 Vadovic et al. Nov 1977 A
4069304 Starkovish et al. Jan 1978 A
4077778 Nahas et al. Mar 1978 A
4091073 Winkler May 1978 A
4092125 Stambaugh et al. May 1978 A
4094650 Koh et al. Jun 1978 A
4100256 Bozzelli et al. Jul 1978 A
4101449 Noda et al. Jul 1978 A
4104201 Banks et al. Aug 1978 A
4113615 Gorbaty Sep 1978 A
4116996 Huang Sep 1978 A
4118204 Eakman et al. Oct 1978 A
4152119 Schulz May 1979 A
4157246 Eakman et al. Jun 1979 A
4159195 Clavenna Jun 1979 A
4162902 Wiesner et al. Jul 1979 A
4173465 Meissner et al. Nov 1979 A
4189307 Marion Feb 1980 A
4193771 Sharp et al. Mar 1980 A
4193772 Sharp Mar 1980 A
4200439 Lang Apr 1980 A
4204843 Neavel May 1980 A
4211538 Eakman et al. Jul 1980 A
4211669 Eakman et al. Jul 1980 A
4219338 Wolfs et al. Aug 1980 A
4223728 Pegg Sep 1980 A
4225457 Schulz Sep 1980 A
4235044 Cheung Nov 1980 A
4243639 Haas et al. Jan 1981 A
4249471 Gunnerman Feb 1981 A
4252771 Lagana et al. Feb 1981 A
4260421 Brown et al. Apr 1981 A
4265868 Kamody May 1981 A
4270937 Adler et al. Jun 1981 A
4284416 Nahas Aug 1981 A
4292048 Wesselhoft et al. Sep 1981 A
4298584 Makrides Nov 1981 A
4315753 Bruckenstein et al. Feb 1982 A
4315758 Patel et al. Feb 1982 A
4318712 Lang et al. Mar 1982 A
4322222 Sass Mar 1982 A
4330305 Kuessner et al. May 1982 A
4331451 Isogaya et al. May 1982 A
4334893 Lang Jun 1982 A
4336034 Lang et al. Jun 1982 A
4336233 Appl et al. Jun 1982 A
4341531 Duranleau et al. Jul 1982 A
4344486 Parrish Aug 1982 A
4347063 Sherwood et al. Aug 1982 A
4348486 Calvin et al. Sep 1982 A
4348487 Calvin et al. Sep 1982 A
4353713 Cheng Oct 1982 A
4365975 Williams et al. Dec 1982 A
4372755 Tolman et al. Feb 1983 A
4375362 Moss Mar 1983 A
4385905 Tucker May 1983 A
4397656 Ketkar Aug 1983 A
4400182 Davies et al. Aug 1983 A
4407206 Bartok et al. Oct 1983 A
4428535 Venetucci Jan 1984 A
4432773 Euker, Jr. et al. Feb 1984 A
4433065 Van Der Burgt et al. Feb 1984 A
4436028 Wilder Mar 1984 A
4436531 Estabrook et al. Mar 1984 A
4439210 Lancet Mar 1984 A
4443415 Queneau et al. Apr 1984 A
4444568 Beisswenger et al. Apr 1984 A
4459138 Soung Jul 1984 A
4462814 Holmes et al. Jul 1984 A
4466828 Tamai et al. Aug 1984 A
4468231 Bartok et al. Aug 1984 A
4478425 Benko Oct 1984 A
4478725 Velling et al. Oct 1984 A
4482529 Chen et al. Nov 1984 A
4491609 Degel et al. Jan 1985 A
4497784 Diaz Feb 1985 A
4500323 Siegfried et al. Feb 1985 A
4505881 Diaz Mar 1985 A
4508544 Moss Apr 1985 A
4508693 Diaz Apr 1985 A
4515604 Eisenlohr et al. May 1985 A
4515764 Diaz May 1985 A
4524050 Chen et al. Jun 1985 A
4540681 Kustes et al. Sep 1985 A
4541841 Reinhardt Sep 1985 A
4551155 Wood et al. Nov 1985 A
4558027 McKee et al. Dec 1985 A
4572826 Moore Feb 1986 A
4594140 Cheng Jun 1986 A
4597775 Billimoria et al. Jul 1986 A
4597776 Ullman et al. Jul 1986 A
4604105 Aquino et al. Aug 1986 A
4609388 Adler et al. Sep 1986 A
4609456 Deschamps et al. Sep 1986 A
4617027 Lang Oct 1986 A
4619864 Hendrix et al. Oct 1986 A
4620421 Brown et al. Nov 1986 A
4661237 Kimura et al. Apr 1987 A
4668428 Najjar May 1987 A
4668429 Najjar May 1987 A
4675035 Apffel Jun 1987 A
4678480 Heinrich et al. Jul 1987 A
4682986 Lee et al. Jul 1987 A
4690814 Velenyi et al. Sep 1987 A
4696678 Koyama et al. Sep 1987 A
4699632 Babu et al. Oct 1987 A
4704136 Weston et al. Nov 1987 A
4720289 Vaugh et al. Jan 1988 A
4747938 Khan May 1988 A
4781731 Schlinger Nov 1988 A
4803061 Najjar et al. Feb 1989 A
4808194 Najjar et al. Feb 1989 A
4810475 Chu et al. Mar 1989 A
4822935 Scott Apr 1989 A
4848983 Tomita et al. Jul 1989 A
4854944 Strong Aug 1989 A
4861346 Najjar et al. Aug 1989 A
4861360 Apffel Aug 1989 A
4872886 Henley et al. Oct 1989 A
4876080 Paulson Oct 1989 A
4892567 Yan Jan 1990 A
4960450 Schwarz et al. Oct 1990 A
4995193 Soga et al. Feb 1991 A
5017282 Delbianco et al. May 1991 A
5055181 Maa et al. Oct 1991 A
5057294 Sheth et al. Oct 1991 A
5059406 Sheth et al. Oct 1991 A
5074357 Haines Dec 1991 A
5093094 Van Kleeck et al. Mar 1992 A
5094737 Bearden, Jr. et al. Mar 1992 A
5132007 Meyer et al. Jul 1992 A
5223173 Jeffrey Jun 1993 A
5225044 Breu Jul 1993 A
5236557 Muller et al. Aug 1993 A
5242470 Salter et al. Sep 1993 A
5250083 Wolfenbarger et al. Oct 1993 A
5277884 Shinnar et al. Jan 1994 A
5388645 Puri et al. Feb 1995 A
5388650 Michael Feb 1995 A
5435940 Doering et al. Jul 1995 A
5536893 Gudmundsson Jul 1996 A
5566755 Seidle et al. Oct 1996 A
5616154 Elliott et al. Apr 1997 A
5630854 Sealock, Jr. et al. May 1997 A
5641327 Leas Jun 1997 A
5660807 Forg et al. Aug 1997 A
5669960 Couche Sep 1997 A
5670122 Zamansky et al. Sep 1997 A
5720785 Baker Feb 1998 A
5733515 Doughty et al. Mar 1998 A
5769165 Bross et al. Jun 1998 A
5776212 Leas Jul 1998 A
5788724 Carugati et al. Aug 1998 A
5855631 Leas Jan 1999 A
5865898 Holtzapple et al. Feb 1999 A
5968465 Koveal et al. Oct 1999 A
6013158 Wootten Jan 2000 A
6015104 Rich, Jr. Jan 2000 A
6028234 Heinemann et al. Feb 2000 A
6032737 Brady et al. Mar 2000 A
6090356 Jahnke et al. Jul 2000 A
6119778 Seidle et al. Sep 2000 A
6132478 Tsurui et al. Oct 2000 A
6180843 Heinemann et al. Jan 2001 B1
6187465 Galloway Feb 2001 B1
6379645 Bucci et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389820 Rogers et al. May 2002 B1
6419888 Wyckoff Jul 2002 B1
6506349 Khanmamedov Jan 2003 B1
6506361 Machado et al. Jan 2003 B1
6602326 Lee et al. Aug 2003 B2
6641625 Clawson et al. Nov 2003 B1
6653516 Yoshikawa et al. Nov 2003 B1
6692711 Alexion et al. Feb 2004 B1
6790430 Lackner et al. Sep 2004 B1
6797253 Lyon Sep 2004 B2
6808543 Paisley Oct 2004 B2
6830597 Green Dec 2004 B1
6855852 Jackson et al. Feb 2005 B1
6878358 Vosteen et al. Apr 2005 B2
6894183 Choudhary et al. May 2005 B2
6955595 Kim Oct 2005 B2
6955695 Nahas Oct 2005 B2
6969494 Herbst Nov 2005 B2
7056359 Somerville et al. Jun 2006 B1
7074373 Warren et al. Jul 2006 B1
7077202 Shaw et al. Jul 2006 B2
7100692 Parsley et al. Sep 2006 B2
7118720 Mendelsohn et al. Oct 2006 B1
7132183 Galloway Nov 2006 B2
7168488 Olsvik et al. Jan 2007 B2
7205448 Gajda et al. Apr 2007 B2
7220502 Galloway May 2007 B2
7299868 Zapadinski Nov 2007 B2
7309383 Beech, Jr. et al. Dec 2007 B2
7481275 Olsvik et al. Jan 2009 B2
7666383 Green Feb 2010 B2
7677309 Shaw et al. Mar 2010 B2
7758663 Rabovitser et al. Jul 2010 B2
7897126 Rappas et al. Mar 2011 B2
7901644 Rappas et al. Mar 2011 B2
7922782 Sheth Apr 2011 B2
7926750 Hauserman Apr 2011 B2
7976593 Graham Jul 2011 B2
8114176 Nahas Feb 2012 B2
8114177 Hippo et al. Feb 2012 B2
8123827 Robinson Feb 2012 B2
8163048 Rappas et al. Apr 2012 B2
8192716 Raman et al. Jun 2012 B2
8202913 Robinson et al. Jun 2012 B2
8268899 Robinson et al. Sep 2012 B2
8286901 Rappas et al. Oct 2012 B2
8297542 Rappas et al. Oct 2012 B2
8328890 Reiling et al. Dec 2012 B2
8349037 Steiner et al. Jan 2013 B2
8349039 Robinson Jan 2013 B2
8361428 Raman et al. Jan 2013 B2
8366795 Raman et al. Feb 2013 B2
8479833 Raman Jul 2013 B2
8479834 Preston Jul 2013 B2
8502007 Hippo et al. Aug 2013 B2
20020036086 Minkkinen et al. Mar 2002 A1
20030070808 Allison Apr 2003 A1
20030131582 Anderson et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030167691 Nahas Sep 2003 A1
20040020123 Kimura et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040023086 Su et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040123601 Fan Jul 2004 A1
20040180971 Inoue et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040256116 Olsvik et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050107648 Kimura et al. May 2005 A1
20050137442 Gajda et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050192362 Rodriguez et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050287056 Baker et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288537 Maund et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060149423 Barnicki et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060228290 Green Oct 2006 A1
20060231252 Shaw et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060265953 Hobbs Nov 2006 A1
20060272813 Olsvik et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070000177 Hippo et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070051043 Schingnitz Mar 2007 A1
20070083072 Nahas Apr 2007 A1
20070180990 Downs et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070186472 Rabovister et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070220810 Leveson et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070227729 Zubrin et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070237696 Payton Oct 2007 A1
20070277437 Sheth Dec 2007 A1
20070282018 Jenkins Dec 2007 A1
20080022586 Gilbert et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080141591 Kohl Jun 2008 A1
20080289822 Betzer Tsilevich Nov 2008 A1
20090012188 Rojey et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090048476 Rappas et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090090055 Ohtsuka Apr 2009 A1
20090090056 Ohtsuka Apr 2009 A1
20090165361 Rappas et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090165376 Lau et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090165379 Rappas Jul 2009 A1
20090165380 Lau et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090165381 Robinson Jul 2009 A1
20090165382 Rappas et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090165383 Rappas et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090165384 Lau et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090166588 Spitz et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090169448 Rappas et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090169449 Rappas et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090170968 Nahas et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090173079 Wallace et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090217575 Raman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217582 May et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217584 Raman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217585 Raman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217586 Rappas et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217587 Raman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217588 Hippo et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217589 Robinson Sep 2009 A1
20090217590 Rappas et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090218424 Hauserman Sep 2009 A1
20090220406 Rahman Sep 2009 A1
20090229182 Raman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090235585 Neels et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090236093 Zubrin et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090246120 Raman et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090259080 Raman et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090260287 Lau Oct 2009 A1
20090305093 Biollaz et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324458 Robinson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324459 Robinson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324460 Robinson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324461 Robinson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324462 Robinson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100018113 Bohlig et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100050654 Chiu et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100071235 Pan et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100071262 Robinson et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076235 Reiling et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100120926 Robinson et al. May 2010 A1
20100121125 Hippo et al. May 2010 A1
20100159352 Gelin et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168494 Rappas et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100168495 Rappas et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100179232 Robinson et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100287835 Reiling et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287836 Robinson et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100292350 Robinson et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110031439 Sirdeshpande et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110062012 Robinson Mar 2011 A1
20110062721 Sirdeshpande et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110062722 Sirdeshpande et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110064648 Preston et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110088896 Preston Apr 2011 A1
20110088897 Raman Apr 2011 A1
20110146978 Perlman Jun 2011 A1
20110146979 Wallace Jun 2011 A1
20110197501 Taulbee Aug 2011 A1
20110207002 Powell et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110217602 Sirdeshpande Sep 2011 A1
20110262323 Rappas et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110294905 Robinson et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120046510 Sirdeshpande Feb 2012 A1
20120060417 Raman et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120102836 Raman et al. May 2012 A1
20120102837 Raman et al. May 2012 A1
20120210635 Edwards Aug 2012 A1
20120213680 Rappas et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120271072 Robinson et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120305848 Sirdeshpande Dec 2012 A1
20130042824 Sirdeshpande Feb 2013 A1
20130046124 Sirdeshpande Feb 2013 A1
20130172640 Robinson et al. Jul 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (160)
Number Date Country
966660 Apr 1975 CA
1003217 Jan 1977 CA
1041553 Oct 1978 CA
1106178 Aug 1981 CA
1 125 026 Jun 1982 CA
1187702 Jun 1985 CA
1282243 Apr 1991 CA
1299589 Apr 1992 CA
1332108 Sep 1994 CA
2673121 Jun 2008 CA
2713642 Jul 2009 CA
1477090 Feb 2004 CN
101555420 Oct 2009 CN
2 210 891 Mar 1972 DE
2210891 Sep 1972 DE
2852710 Jun 1980 DE
3422202 Dec 1985 DE
100610607 Jun 2002 DE
0024792 Mar 1981 EP
0 067 580 Dec 1982 EP
102828 Mar 1984 EP
0 138 463 Apr 1985 EP
0 225 146 Jun 1987 EP
0 259 927 Mar 1988 EP
0473153 Mar 1992 EP
0 723 930 Jul 1996 EP
819 Apr 2000 EP
1001002 May 2000 EP
1004746 May 2000 EP
1136542 Sep 2001 EP
1 207 132 May 2002 EP
1 741 673 Jun 2006 EP
1768207 Mar 2007 EP
2058471 May 2009 EP
797 089 Apr 1936 FR
2 478 615 Sep 1981 FR
2906879 Apr 2008 FR
593910 Oct 1947 GB
640907 Aug 1950 GB
676615 Jul 1952 GB
701 131 Dec 1953 GB
760627 Nov 1956 GB
798741 Jul 1958 GB
820 257 Sep 1959 GB
996327 Jun 1965 GB
1033764 Jun 1966 GB
1448562 Sep 1976 GB
1453081 Oct 1976 GB
1467219 Mar 1977 GB
1467995 Mar 1977 GB
1 599 932 Jul 1977 GB
1560873 Feb 1980 GB
2078251 Jan 1982 GB
2154600 Sep 1985 GB
2455864 Jun 2009 GB
53-94305 Aug 1978 JP
53-111302 Sep 1978 JP
54020003 Feb 1979 JP
54-150402 Nov 1979 JP
55-12181 Jan 1980 JP
56-145982 Nov 1981 JP
56157493 Dec 1981 JP
60-35092 Feb 1985 JP
60-77938 May 1985 JP
62241991 Oct 1987 JP
62 257985 Nov 1987 JP
03-115491 May 1991 JP
2000290659 Oct 2000 JP
2000290670 Oct 2000 JP
2002105467 Apr 2002 JP
2004292200 Oct 2004 JP
2004298818 Oct 2004 JP
2006 169476 Jun 2006 JP
0018681 Apr 2000 WO
0043468 Jul 2000 WO
0240768 May 2002 WO
02079355 Oct 2002 WO
02103157 Dec 2002 WO
03018958 Mar 2003 WO
03033624 Apr 2003 WO
2004055323 Jul 2004 WO
2004072210 Aug 2004 WO
2006031011 Mar 2006 WO
2007005284 Jan 2007 WO
2007047210 Apr 2007 WO
2007068682 Jun 2007 WO
2007076363 Jul 2007 WO
2007077137 Jul 2007 WO
2007077138 Jul 2007 WO
2007083072 Jul 2007 WO
2007128370 Nov 2007 WO
2007143376 Dec 2007 WO
2008058636 May 2008 WO
2008073889 Jun 2008 WO
2008087154 Jul 2008 WO
2009018053 Feb 2009 WO
2009048723 Apr 2009 WO
2009048724 Apr 2009 WO
2009086361 Jul 2009 WO
2009086362 Jul 2009 WO
2009086363 Jul 2009 WO
2009086366 Jul 2009 WO
2009086367 Jul 2009 WO
2009086370 Jul 2009 WO
2009086372 Jul 2009 WO
2009086374 Jul 2009 WO
2009086377 Jul 2009 WO
2009086383 Jul 2009 WO
2009086407 Jul 2009 WO
2009086408 Jul 2009 WO
2009111330 Sep 2009 WO
2009111331 Sep 2009 WO
2009111332 Sep 2009 WO
2009111335 Sep 2009 WO
2009111342 Sep 2009 WO
2009111345 Sep 2009 WO
2009124017 Oct 2009 WO
2009124019 Oct 2009 WO
2009158576 Dec 2009 WO
2009158579 Dec 2009 WO
2009158580 Dec 2009 WO
2009158582 Dec 2009 WO
2009158583 Dec 2009 WO
2010033846 Mar 2010 WO
2010033848 Mar 2010 WO
2010033850 Mar 2010 WO
2010033852 Mar 2010 WO
2010048493 Apr 2010 WO
2010078297 Jul 2010 WO
2010078298 Jul 2010 WO
2010132549 Nov 2010 WO
2010132551 Nov 2010 WO
2011017630 Feb 2011 WO
2011029278 Mar 2011 WO
2011029282 Mar 2011 WO
2011029283 Mar 2011 WO
2011029284 Mar 2011 WO
2011029285 Mar 2011 WO
2011034888 Mar 2011 WO
2011034889 Mar 2011 WO
2011034890 Mar 2011 WO
2011034891 Mar 2011 WO
2011049858 Apr 2011 WO
2011049861 Apr 2011 WO
2011063608 Jun 2011 WO
2011084580 Jul 2011 WO
2011084581 Jul 2011 WO
2011106285 Sep 2011 WO
2011139694 Nov 2011 WO
2011150217 Dec 2011 WO
2012024369 Feb 2012 WO
2012033997 Mar 2012 WO
2012061235 May 2012 WO
2012061238 May 2012 WO
2012116003 Aug 2012 WO
2012145497 Oct 2012 WO
2012166879 Dec 2012 WO
2013025808 Feb 2013 WO
2013025812 Feb 2013 WO
2013052553 Apr 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (55)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,538, filed May 12, 2010, Robinson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,548, filed May 12, 2010, Robinson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,552, filed May 12, 2010, Robinson, et al.
Asami, K., et al., “Highly Active Iron Catalysts from Ferric Chloride or the Steam Gasification of Brown Coal,” ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 32, No. 8, 1993, pp. 1631-1636.
Berger, R. et al., “High Temperature CO2-Absorption: A Process Offering New Prospects in Fuel Chemistry,” The Fifth International Symposium on Coal Combustion, Nov. 2003, Nanjing, China, pp. 547-549.
Brown et al., “Biomass-Derived Hydrogen From a Thermally Ballasted Gasifier,” Aug. 2005.
Brown et al., “Biomass-Derived Hydrogen From a Thermally Ballasted Gasifier,” DOE Hydrogen Program Contractors' Review Metting, Center for Sustainable Environmental Technologies, Iowa State University, May 21, 2003.
Cohen, S.J., Project Manager, “Large Pilot Plant Alternatives for Scaleup of the Catalytic Coal Gasification Process,” FE-2480-20, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Contract No. EX-76-C-01-2480, 1979.
Euker, Jr., C.A., Reitz, R.A., Program Managers, “Exxon Catalytic Coal-Gasification-Process Development Program,” Exxon Research & Engineering Company, FE-2777-31, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Contract No. ET-78-C-01-2777, 1981.
Kalina, T., Nahas, N.C., Project Managers, “Exxon Catalaytic Coal Gasification Process Predevelopment Program,” Exxon Research & Engineering Company, FE-2369-24, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Contract No. E(49-18)-2369, 1978.
Nahas, N.C., “Exxon Catalytic Coal Gasification Process—Fundamentals to Flowsheets,” Fuel, vol. 62, No. 2, 1983, pp. 239-241.
Ohtsuka, Y. et al., “Highly Active Catalysts from Inexpensive Raw Materials for Coal Gasification,” Catalysis Today, vol. 39, 1997, pp. 111-125.
Ohtsuka, Yasuo et al, “Steam Gasification of Low-Rank Coals with a Chlorine-Free Iron Catalyst from Ferric Chloride,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 30, No. 8, 1991, pp. 1921-1926.
Ohtsuka, Yasuo et al., “Calcium Catalysed Steam Gasification of Yalourn Brown Coal,” Fuel, vol. 65, 1986, pp. 1653-1657.
Ohtsuka, Yasuo, et al, “Iron-Catalyzed Gasification of Brown Coal at Low Temperatures,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 1, No. 1, 1987, pp. 32-36.
Ohtsuka, Yasuo, et al., “Ion-Exchanged Calcium From Calcium Carbonate and Low-Rank Coals: High Catalytic Activity in Steam Gasification,” Energy & Fuels 1996, 10, pp. 431-435.
Ohtsuka, Yasuo et al., “Steam Gasification of Coals with Calcium Hydroxide,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 9, No. 6, 1995, pp. 1038-1042.
Pereira, P., et al., “Catalytic Steam Gasification of Coals,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 6, No. 4, 1992, pp. 407-410.
Ruan Xiang-Quan, et al., “Effects of Catalysis on Gasification of Tatong Coal Char,” Fuel, vol. 66, Apr. 1987, pp. 568-571.
Tandon, D., “Low Temperature and Elevated Pressure Steam Gasification of Illinois Coal,” College of Engineering in the Graduate School, Southern Illinois university at Carbondale, Jun. 1996.
Adsorption, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adsorption, pp. 1-8, (Oct. 17, 2007).
Amine gas treating, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid—gas—removal, pp. 1-4 (Oct. 21, 2007).
Coal, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal—gasification, pp. 1-8 (Oct. 29, 2007).
Coal Data: A Reference, Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric, and Alternate Fuels U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/EIA-0064(93), Feb. 1995.
Deepak Tandon, Dissertation Approval, “Low Temperature and Elevated Pressure Steam Gasification of Illinois Coal”, Jun. 13, 1996.
Demibras, “Demineralization of Agricultural Residues by Water Leaching”, Energy Sources, vol. 25, pp. 679-687, (2003).
Fluidized Bed Gasifiers, http://www.energyproducts.com/fluidized—bed—gasifiers.htm Oct. 2007, pp. 1-5.
Gas separation, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas—separation, pp. 1-2 (Feb. 24, 2007).
Gasification, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasification, pp. 1-6 (Oct. 29, 2007).
Gallagher Jr., et al., “Catalytic Coal Gasification for SNG Manufacture”, Energy Research, vol. 4, pp. 137-147, (1980).
Heinemann, et al., “Fundamental and Exploratory Studies of Catalytic Steam Gasification of Carbonaceous Materials”, Final Report Fiscal Years 1985-1994.
Jensen, et al. Removal of K and C1 by leaching of straw char, Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 20, pp. 447-457, (2001).
Mengjie, et al., “A potential renewable energy resource development and utilization of biomass energy”, http://www.fao.org.docrep/T4470E/t4470e0n.htm, pp. 1-8 (1994).
Meyers, et al. Fly Ash as a Construction Material for Highways, A Manual. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-IP-76-16, Washington, DC, 1976.
Moulton, Lyle K. “Bottom Ash and Boiler Slag”, Proceedings of the Third International Ash Utilization Symposium, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Information Circular No. 8640, Washington, DC, 1973.
Natural gas processing, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural—gas—processing, pp. 1-4 (Oct. 22, 2007).
Natural Gas Processing: The Crucial Link Between Natural Gas Production and Its Transportation to Market. Energy Information Administration, Office of Oil and Gas; pp. 1-11, (2006).
Prins, et al., “Exergetic optimisation of a production process of Fischer-Tropsch fuels from biomass”, Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 86, pp. 375-389, (2004).
Reboiler, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reboiler, pp. 1-4 (Nov. 11, 2007).
What is XPS?, http://www.nuance.northwestern.edu/KeckII/xps1.asp, 2006, pp. 1-2 (2006).
2.3 Types of gasifiers, http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0512e/T0512e0a.htm, pp. 1-6 (1986).
2.4 Gasification fuels, http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0512e/T0512e0b.htm#TopofPage, pp. 1-8 (1986).
2.5 Design of downdraught gasifiers, http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0512e/T0512e0c.htm#TopOfPage, pp. 1-8 (1986).
2.6 Gas cleaning and cooling, http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0512e0d.htm#TopOfPage, pp. 1-3 (1986).
A.G. Collot et al., “Co-pyrolysis and co-gasification of coal and biomass in bench-scale fixed-bed and fluidized bed reactors”, (1999) Fuel 78, pp. 667-679.
Wenkui Zhu et al., “Catalytic gasification of char from co-pyrolysis of coal and biomass”, (2008) Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 89, pp. 890-896.
Chiesa P. et al., “Co-Production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions”, (2005) International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 30, No. 7, pp. 747-767.
Chiaramonte et al, “Upgrade Coke by Gasification”, (1982) Hydrocarbon Processing, vol. 61 (9), pp. 255-257 (Abstract only).
Gerdes, Kristin, et al., “Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell Performance and Cost Assessment,” National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Mar. 27, 2009, pp. 1-26.
Ghosh, S., et al., “Energy Analysis of a Cogeneration Plant Using Coal Gasification and Solid Oxide Fuel Cell,” Energy, 2006, vol. 31, No. 2-3, pp. 345-363.
Jeon, S.K., et al., “Characteristics of Steam Hydrogasification of Wood Using a Micro-Batch Reactor,” Fuel, 2007, vol. 86, pp. 2817-2823.
Li, Mu, et al., “Design of Highly Efficient Coal-Based Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell Power Plants,” Journal of Power Sources, 2010, vol. 195, pp. 5707-5718.
Prins, M.J., et al., “Exergetic Optimisation of a Production Process of Fischer-Tropsch Fuels from Biomass,” Fuel Processing Technology, 2005, vol. 86, No. 4, pp. 375-389.
Hydromethanation Process, GreatPoint Energy, Inc., from World Wide Web <http://greatpointenergy.com/ourtechnology.php.> accessed Sep. 5, 2013.
Sigma-Aldrich “Particle Size Conversion Table” (2004); from World Wide Web <http:/www.sigmaaldrich.com/chemistry/learning-center/technical-library/particle-size-conversion.printview.html>.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140091259 A1 Apr 2014 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61708104 Oct 2012 US
61775775 Mar 2013 US