Electronic devices such as electronic book readers (“e-book readers”), cellular telephones, personal digital assistant (PDA), portable media players, tablet computers, netbooks, and the like, may display digital works such as electronic books or other electronic media content to a user. Users may include purchasers of the electronic media, prospective purchasers of the electronic media, or other consumers, for example, library patrons. As the quantity of available electronic media content continues grow, filtering of and providing access to portions of electronic media content considered relevant to users and communities of users has become more desirable. Such access may function as a community-driven reputation system for passages in the work, and may render information more easily accessible and further encourage sales of electronic media content.
The detailed description is set forth with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
As described above, as the quantity of digital works has grown, providing access to portions of electronic media content considered relevant to users has become more difficult. Facilitating such access for users may render information more easily accessible and further encourage sales of and use of a digital work.
This disclosure describes aggregation of highlights, in which commonly highlighted sections of digital works are identified and may be made available to the public and/or purchasers of the digital work. Users comprising a “community” may highlight a digital work. The community may also comprise those who view but do not create highlights. “Highlighting,” as used herein, is the selection of a portion of a digital work, considered to be of interest or relevance by a user. Highlights may either be made by a user selected portion, automatically by monitoring usage characteristics such as dwell time on a portion, physical highlights taken from a scanned physical document, etc. Highlights taken from scanned physical documents may be characterized by the nature of the highlight, i.e., different color highlights or underlining of a passage. These different characteristics of highlights in physical documents may be determined to represent different levels of importance, different individual highlighters, or a combination of these. Highlights from multiple users may be aggregated, leading to a “Wisdom of Crowds” effect where a selection of highlights by many may be more relevant or useful than highlights selected by a small number of users.
In one example, a server receives and consolidates these highlights. Minimum and/or maximum lengths for individual highlights or other thresholds may be pre-determined or dynamically adjusted. For example, non-fiction programming books might have a minimum highlight length greater than that of a fiction work. Thresholds may also be determined on the fly, taking into account some book-specific heuristics. For example, a book with a low Flesch-Kincaid readability score may have a minimum highlight length set lower than one a work with a high Flesch-Kincaid readability score. Where multiple versions or editions of a book are highlighted, highlights may be synchronized across versions. The server then determines the most commonly highlighted sections of the digital work and selects aggregated highlights corresponding to those sections according to one or more selection rules. The server may create a public version of aggregated highlights for a digital work and/or a purchase version. For example, the purchase version may be available for some remuneration, and provide more extensive or lengthy highlights than the public version. For instance, prospective customers or current licensees of a digital work may view the public version of the aggregated highlights to determine if a digital work is indeed what they wish to purchase. Likewise, a user with a license to consume a digital work may purchase the aggregated highlights. To protect rights of a digital work's owner, a maximum threshold for the quantity of a digital work displayed as aggregated highlights may be limited.
Once collected, a highlight user interface (HUI) may visually present aggregated highlights to a user on an electronic device. The HUI may indicate aggregated highlights and their relative ranking, for example, using different colors and/or intensities of color. Highlights may be displayed as a graph, with the relative height of each bar indicating a frequency for each elementary interval in the digital work. For example, the graph may be bar, line, or histogram style. A user may navigate through the digital work by selecting aggregated highlights presented in the HUI. In addition to the aggregated highlights, the HUI may present highlights entered by the user of the electronic device. The HUI could also present highlights entered by other users who have either have a particular role or significance (e.g., the author) or who have a particular relationship to the user. Statistics comparing the user's highlights with those of other users or communities may also be presented. For example, a user may see that a portion they have highlighted was also highlighted by 80% of the members of a community.
While aggregated highlighting is described in the context of highlighting textual content, the concepts described herein are also applicable to highlighting of sections of other digital works, such as audio recordings, video recordings, or the like. Also, while processes are described as being implemented using eBook reader devices, digital works may be highlighted and/or displayed by electronic devices of an eBook other than eBook reader devices, such as cellular telephones, PDAs, portable media players, tablet computers, netbooks, notebooks, desktop computers, and the like.
Aggregated Highlighting
Additionally or alternatively, a highlighter 110 may use a client 112 to highlight a digital work. The client 112 may comprise a personal computer, laptop, netbook, PDA, or other device capable of displaying a digital work, highlighting the digital work, and communicating those highlights to server 108 via network 106. Highlighter 110 has access rights to the digital work being highlighted, but may or may not have possessory rights. For example, a patron in a library may be permitted to highlight a digital work, but not access the digital work from their home.
A prospective customer 114 may use a client 116 to view a public version of aggregated highlights 118 for a digital work. The transfer of highlights may be initiated by device 104 (as a “pull” of data), by the server 108 (as a “push” of data), or a combination. The public version of aggregated highlights 118 may comprise a selected subset of highlights available for the digital work. This subset may have maximum size limitations, or content limitations. For example, a public version of the aggregated highlights may provide no more than a predetermined percentage (e.g., two percent) of a body of the digital work to comply with conditions set forth by the owner of intellectual property rights in the digital work. Alternatively, the owner of the digital work may choose to opt out of aggregated highlighting altogether.
In another example, aggregated highlights from a portion of a digital work may not be made public. For example, highlights in a last chapter of a mystery novel where a solution is presented may not be displayed, or be hidden until clicking to view a “spoiler” highlight. Prospective customer 114 may view the public version of the aggregated highlights 118 and decide that the digital work is of sufficient interest to warrant purchase or otherwise gain access to the digital work.
A purchaser 120 of a digital work, for example an electronic book, may acquire a purchase version of aggregated highlights 122 to view on their device 124. As above, the transfer of highlights may be initiated by device 104 (as a “pull” of data), by the server 108 (as a “push” of data), or a combination. This purchase version may contain the entire repertoire of aggregated highlights available, which have been selected as described below. For example, the purchaser 110 of the purchase version of aggregated highlights 122 would have access to view the highlights in the last chapter of the mystery novel described above. Additionally, the purchase version of the aggregated highlights 122 may not be subject to the same predetermined highlighting limit (e.g., two percent) as the public version. As above, a user may choose to not display hidden highlights, such as “spoilers,” unless selected.
The customer database 208 comprises information about users participating in the community. The digital items database 210 comprises digital works themselves, for example music, books, movies, etc. Digital works may be accessed in common. That is, each user with access to a particular work may access a common copy of that item, or each user may access their own discrete copy of an item stored in a digital locker. The highlight database 212 may comprise highlighted intervals of a digital work, a version or edition number of the digital work which the highlights are for, etc.
A highlight processing module 214 is also present within memory 204 and coupled to digital work collection module 206. The highlight processing module 214 comprises a highlight selection module 216 and a version creation module 218. The highlight processing module 214 processes highlights from highlighters to create versions of aggregated highlights for use by the community. The version creation module 218 may create different versions of aggregated highlights for distribution or use, such as a public version 220 and a purchase version 222. As described above, a public version 220 may comprise a subset of highlights available in the purchase version 222.
The highlight processing module 214 is in communication with a client 224. Client 224 may comprise a processor 226 and memory 228. Memory may include computer-readable storage media as described below. Stored in memory 228 is a highlight user interface (HUI) module 230. The HUI module 230 may present a public version 232 of aggregated highlights or a purchase version 234 of aggregated highlights stored in memory 228, as retrieved from server 108, depending on highlight viewing rights the user may have. Additionally, a user of the client 224 may have highlight submission rights, allowing the user to submit highlights to the server 108 for inclusion in the highlight database 212. When a user has highlighting rights, a highlight file 236 may be created when highlights are made of the digital work on the client 224. The highlight file 236 stored in memory 228 may be provided to server 108 for incorporation into highlight database 212.
Selecting Highlights
Highlights for the various editions are stored in highlight database 212. As described below, these highlights may be reconciled across the various editions.
At 402, highlights across multiple versions of a digital work are reconciled, when they are present. Reconciliation may comprise synchronization of versions 404 and consolidating the synchronized highlights 406. To aid synchronization of versions 404, a reference database (not shown) is provided that includes the multiple versions of the digital work, including a reference version of a digital work, for example, a first edition of a book. Internal reference points, for example chapter headings or individual words in an electronic book, may be used to align the multiple versions. Reconciliation may take place on a per-highlight basis. For example, if the contents of one highlight matches another highlight, the two may be reconciled as equivalent. Highlights may also be reconciled using statistically improbable phrases.
At 408, highlight selection rules, described below, are applied to the available highlights to create selected highlights. However, highlights may encompass more than the portion of the digital work of interest to the user. In an electronic book, for example, the e-book reader or other display device may constrain the user to highlight only entire lines of displayed text, rather than individual characters or words. Thus, a user may select more than the desired text when highlighting a phrase beginning in the middle of one highlighted line and ending in the middle of the next highlighted line. In this example, the resulting highlight incorporates the end of an earlier phrase and the beginning of the following phrase, which may not be relevant to the user. Where desired, a phrase breaking or detection process may be used to provide context comprising adjacent text preceding and/or following highlighted text. Thus a phrase breaking or detection process may strip out the incomplete phrases, leaving the modified highlight for further processing. Alternatively, the processing could provide the remainder of the phrase before and of the phrase after, and could optionally indicate for example through display mechanisms which part was included in the highlight and which was in the preceding phrase. The mechanisms for such a display could include but are not limited to hyperlinked ellipses, arrows, or text of different color or different background.
A phrase breaking or detection process may look to punctuation, spacing, capitalization, or a dictionary of words, etc. to determine when a phrase ends in an electronic book. Digital works comprising other formats, such as audio or video may incorporate a portion breaking or detection process using silence in an audio track, changes between video frames, metadata markers in the digital work, etc. to determine when a particular portion ends.
At 410, the selected highlights are produced and may be stored, displayed to a user, etc. In some implementations, these highlight selection rules may incorporate filters to remove attribution information of a particular highlight to a particular user, remove highlights which are not made by a minimum threshold of users, and so forth. However, highlights from a specially defined user, for example an author of a digital work, a professor or other educator, celebrity, etc, may be incorporated into highlights ultimately presented to the community, or viewed as separate highlights. A user may then toggle or otherwise select to view their own personal highlights, community highlights, highlights from the specially defined user, from other users who have read similar books, from others in the same geographic area, etc., or combinations thereof.
Highlights may then have contextual information, or context. Context may comprise portions of a work before and/or after selected highlights. At 412, context is added to the highlights. For example, where the digital work is an electronic book, context may be sentences immediately before and after the highlight. These sentences are added to the highlighted portion to create highlights with context.
Depicted in this initial raw highlight interval data 602 are the following intervals:
As illustrated in
The overlapping interval value may also be computed to include a source weight. The source weight may be tied to a particular highlighter or community of highlighters. For example, highlights from a digital work's author may be assigned a large source weight, giving each highlight by the author higher priority over highlights by others or even from an entire community of users.
Undesired highlight intervals may be removed next, leaving only desired highlight intervals. Undesired highlight intervals may include highlight intervals which are too long, for example those having a length greater than a pre-determined maximum length. Undesired highlight intervals may also include highlight intervals which are too short, for example those having a length less than a pre-determined minimum length. As described above, pre-determined minimum and maxima may be static or dynamic in response to highlight activity. In this example, the pre-determined maximum length is 16 and the pre-determined minimum length is 2. Thus, D(1-18) is removed as being too long (greater than 16) while A(10-11), B(10-11), and B(8-9) are removed for being too short (less than 2). While this example illustrates computing the overlapping interval value then removing undesired intervals, this order may be changed with the removing occurring before computing taking place.
The desired intervals are sorted in descending order by the overlapping interval value. Once sorted, a desired interval having the greatest number of overlapping intervals is selected, and desired intervals which overlap with the selected interval are eliminated. For example, C(1-5) is chosen first as it has the greatest overlapping interval value of 6. Intervals A(1-3), A(4-7), B(1-3) and B(4-6) are eliminated because they overlap with C(1-5). Interval C(6-9) is chosen next as it has the next highest overlapping interval value of 4. Note that A(4-7) having an overlapping interval value of 5 has previously been eliminated and is no longer in a set of desired intervals. A tie between A(12-15) and B(13-15) is present. In the case of a tie, an interval closer to a predetermined desired length may be selected. In this illustration, the predetermined desired length is 3. However, other predetermined desired lengths could alternatively be used. Thus, A(12-15) would be chosen and B(13-15) would be eliminated.
The intervals selected in the simple elimination method 600 of
As above, initial highlight intervals have overlapping interval values computed and displayed here at 804. An overlapping interval value is computed by counting the intersections of overlapping highlights. For example, C(1-5) intersects 6 distinct intervals: A(1-3), B(1-3), itself C(1-5), D1-18, A(4-7), and B(4-6). A(4-7) intersects 5 intervals, the intervals comprising: itself A(4-7), B(4-6), C(1-5), and C(6-9). D(1-18) spans the entire set of elements, and so intersects 13 intervals including itself.
Undesired highlight intervals may be removed next, leaving only desired highlight intervals. Undesired highlight intervals may include highlight intervals which are too long, for example those having a length greater than a pre-determined maximum length. Undesired highlight intervals may also include highlight intervals which are too short, for example those having a length less than a pre-determined minimum length. In this example, assume the pre-determined maximum length is 16 and the pre-determined minimum length is 2. Thus, D(1-18) is removed as being too long (greater than 16) while A(10-11), B(10-11), and B(8-9) are removed for being too short (less than 2). While this example illustrates computing the overlapping interval value then removing undesired intervals, this order may be changed with the removing occurring before computing taking place.
Next, desired highlight intervals are sorted in descending order by the overlapping interval value. An overlap is detected between a first desired highlight interval and a subsequent desired highlight interval. When detected, the overlapping subsequent desired highlight interval is truncated to the nearest non-overlapping interval. Minimum length requirements may then be reapplied to filter out any intervals not meeting the length requirements.
For example, continuing with the intervals after filtering 902, the following occurs: C(1-5) is chosen first as it has an overlapping interval value of 6. A(1-3) and B(1-3) are contained within C(1-5) and thus eliminated. B(4-6) intersects C(1-5) and is, therefore, truncated and replaced with B(5-6). B(5-6) is below the pre-determined minimum length of 2, and is eliminated. A(4-7) intersects C(1-5) and is, therefore, truncated and replaced with A(5-7).
Chosen next is interval A(5-7). Interval A(5-7) has an overlapping interval value of 5. C(6-9) intersects A(5-7), thus C(6-9) is truncated and replaced with C(7-9).
Chosen next is interval C(7-9) with an overlapping interval value of 4. A two way tie between A(12-15) and B(13-15) occurs. In this example, there is a predetermined preference for highlights closer to a desired length. In this example, the desired length is 1. However, other predetermined preferences could alternatively be used. Thus, in this example, B(13-15) is chosen as it is smaller. A(12-15) is truncated and replaced with A(12-13), and A(12-13) is then eliminated as it is below the pre-determined minimum length of 2.
The intervals selected in the truncation elimination method 800 of
Elementary highlight intervals comprising a start and an end point of all raw highlight intervals are generated. Elementary intervals may be generated by adding start and end values of all intervals to a list. The list is then sorted, and intervals are formed from the intervals in the list. For example, the sorted list of start and end values shown in 1002 would be 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, and 16. The following elementary intervals are then formed from pairs of start and end values: (1,3), (3-4), (4-5), (5-6), (6-7), (7-8), (8-9), (9-10), (10-11), (11-12), (12-13), (13-15), (15-16), and (16-18) (not shown) which has a value of 0, indicating no overlaps. As above, an overlapping interval value for the elementary highlight intervals is computed, and is shown at 1004. One implementation of computation includes inserting the original intervals into a data structure such as a segment tree.
Elementary highlight intervals are sorted in descending order by the overlapping interval value. Sorted elementary highlight intervals are then chosen. Choosing of elementary highlight intervals continues until reaching a predetermined highlight threshold. Chosen elementary highlight intervals are merged with adjacent intervals until the merged intervals meet or exceed a pre-determined minimum length, in this example 2.
In this illustration interval (1-3) is greater than the minimum length of 2 and retained. Interval (4-5) grows to (4-6). Interval (6-7) grows to (6-8). Interval (8-9) grows to (8-10) and interval (10-11) grows to (10-12). The resulting elementary intervals are shown at 1006. These intervals are (1-3), (3-4), (4-6), (6-8), (8-10), (10-12), (12-13), (13-15), and (16-17). Intervals (15-16) and (16-17) are not grown to meet the minimum size threshold as their overlapping interval values do not meet a minimum overlapping interval value threshold (OIVT), in this example the OIVT three. In another implementation, these intervals could be grown and then discarded in the next step.
Next, all un-chosen highlight intervals are discarded, such as those which are below the pre-determined minimum length of 2. Thus, (3-4) and (12-13), (15-16) and (16-17) are discarded in this example.
The intervals selected in the elementary interval accretion method 1000 are illustrated at 1008 and are (1-3), (4-6), (6-8), (8-10), and (13-15).
As described above relative to
Next, as described previously, all elementary highlight intervals are removed that meet or exceed a minimum OIVT. In this example the minimum overlapping interval value is 3, thus (3-4), (7-8), (9-10), (11-12), (12-13), (15-16), and (17-18) are removed, with results displayed at 1106. These results are thus the intervals to be truncated, and comprise the following intervals: (3-4), (7-8), (9-10), (11-12), (12-13), (15-16), (16-17), and (17-18) with a value of zero indicating no overlaps. While this example illustrates computing the overlapping interval value then removing undesired intervals, this order may be changed with the removing occurring before computing taking place.
In this illustration the following takes place with the intervals: C(1-5) is broken into C(1-3) and C(4-5). D(1-18) is broken into D(1-3) and D(4-18). C(6-9) is broken into C(6-7) and C(8-9). D(4-18) is broken into D(4-7) and D(8-18). D(8-18) is broken into D(8-9) and D(10-18). A(12-14) is truncated to A(13-14). D(10-18) is broken into D(10-11) and D(13-18). D(13-18) is broken into D(13-15) and D(16-18). A(16-17) and D(16-18) are discarded due to the truncation, as is (17-18) (not shown) which has a value of 0. This leaves the intervals depicted in 1202, which are:
An overlapping interval value for the elementary highlight intervals is computed and displayed at 1204.
Next, a process similar to that of the simple elimination described above takes place. Desired highlight intervals result after removing undesired highlight intervals. As described above, undesired highlight intervals may be removed next, leaving only desired highlight intervals. Undesired highlight intervals may include highlight intervals which are too long, for example those having a length greater than a pre-determined maximum length. Undesired highlight intervals may also include highlight intervals which are too short, for example those having a length less than a pre-determined minimum length. In this example, the pre-determined maximum length is 16 and the pre-determined minimum length is 2.
The desired highlight intervals are sorted in descending order by the overlapping interval value, and highlight intervals which duplicate an existing desired highlight interval are eliminated. In this illustration the following occurs: A(4-7) and D(4-7) is in a tie, and A (4-7) may be chosen. The choice in the case of a tie may be randomly, or by pre-determined method, such as retaining the first value. Intervals D(4-7) B(4-6), C(4-5) (previously dropped), and C(6-7) (also previously dropped), are eliminated. A(1-3) is chosen next, eliminating B(1-3), C(1-3) and D(1-3). A(13-15), B(13-15), and D(13-15) are in a tie. In this tie, D(13-15) is randomly chosen. This eliminated A(13-15) and B(13-15).
The intervals selected in the elimination/elementary interval hybrid 1100 are illustrated at 1304, and are A(1-3), A(4-7), and D(13-15).
Creating Public and Purchase Highlights
Displaying a Highlight User Interface (HUI)
A highlight viewing interface 1610 may present highlighted passages in a selected digital work. An indication of the highlighted passages 1612 and a highlight count may also be presented to the user. Instead of the highlight count, the HUI may display a metric pertaining to the highlight. For example, the metric may be order of appearance in the digital work, a page on which the passage appears, a count of the number of people who highlighted the particular passage displayed, or location within a work such as chapter, page, section, etc.
Displayed aggregated highlights may be sorted by the metrics pertaining to the aggregated highlights. In this illustration, highlighted passages are sorted in descending order of highlight count or frequency. For example, Passage 1614 “it is the east, and Juliet is the sun!” has been highlighted 45 times, and is listed at the top. Passage 1616 “and thou art wedded to calamity” has been highlighted 27 times and is listed next. Passage 1618 “in fair Verona, where we lay our scene” has been highlighted 15 times and is below passage 1616. Passage 1620 “myself condemned and myself excused” has been highlighted 12 times and is at the bottom of the list presented here.
Buttons to see more highlights 1622, purchase the book 1624, to purchase highlights 1626, to purchase the book and highlights 1628, purchase an e-book reader 1630, toggle highlights 1632, or show highlight context 1634 may also be presented to a user. Presentation of these buttons may be conditional based on the device used to access the digital work. For example, if a user is accessing this interface from an electronic book, they may be presented with the buttons to see more highlights 1622, purchase book 1624 with a single click, or purchase book and highlights 1628 with a single click. When a user has been determined to not have an e-book reader, the user may be presented with an option to purchase an e-book reader 1630. An additional option is a button to purchase the e-book reader, the digital work being displayed, and/or highlights with a single click.
The toggle highlights 1632 button allows a user to select displayed highlights. For example, a user may toggle to view only their personal highlights, highlights from others in their community, highlights from a community of all users, highlights from a person having a particular role or significance (e.g., the author), to show or hide highlights which contains spoilers, etc. Alternately, the user may be presented with a list, set of checkboxes, or other element presenting which highlights to display.
The show highlight context 1634 button allows presentation to the user of additional context comprising portions of the work surrounding the highlight. This additional context may be displayed as a highlight context 1636 pop-up, in this case illustrating the sentences before and after highlight 1614.
Where a user views a digital work in the interface which is not available in electronic form, highlighted passages may not be available. In this case, a message displaying that highlights are not available or a link to connect to a publisher of the digital work and requesting an electronic version may be presented.
This illustrative browser interface may also incorporate a graphic display showing the relative location of highlights within a representation of the work. This graphic display may be incorporate elements of the highlight user interface described next.
In this illustration of the HDI 1704, a beginning of the book is indicated by a left boundary 1706, while an end of the book is indicated by right boundary 1708, with the book being presented in a linear representation. Bands representing passages 1618, 1614, 1616, and 1620 may be distributed along the linear representation in the HDI 1704 according to their approximate location within a body of the book. Color of the bands and/or intensity of the color of the bands may be varied to indicate a correspondence to the metric pertaining to the highlight. For example, highlights with a high frequency of selection may be brilliant crimson, while highlights with a smaller number of highlights may be a dull green. A shape or icon associated with the highlight, for example, the bands in this illustration, may also be displayed with a size proportionate to the metric pertaining to the highlight. For example, highlights with a high frequency of selection may be presented as larger icons than highlights with a lower frequency. In this illustration, passage 1614 has the greatest number of highlights, and is indicated with a solid black band. Passage 1616 has fewer highlights, and is indicated with a medium gray band. Passage 1618 has still fewer highlights, and is indicated with a light gray band.
When the text viewing window 1702 displays text which is the subject of an aggregated highlight, the displayed text may be highlighted visually, such as with reverse video. Furthermore, the highlight which is currently being displayed such as passage 1614 in this illustration may be indicated in the HDI 1704. This indication may comprise an arrow 1710, changing the color of the band corresponding to the passage, blinking the band corresponding to the passage, etc.
A user may also navigate throughout the digital work using the HDI 1704. For example, a user may select a highlight from the HDI 1704, and the display window may be updated to show that portion of the digital work. The user may also use a movement scroll bar 1712 to move forward or backward through a digital work, and a zoom control scroll bar 1714 to increase or decrease the zoom of the HDI 1704 being presented, as described next in
Selection of which highlights to display in the HDI 1704 may proportional to a zoom level. For example, at a low zoom level only highlights having higher ranking metrics may be displayed. In this illustration, the HDI 1704 depicts the entire work, but only highlights having a highlight count greater than ten are shown at this zoom level.
As illustrated, a user has increased the setting of the zoom control scroll bar 1714. As a result of the zoom, the HDI 1704 now displays a beginning of the zoomed section indicated by a left boundary 1804, while an end of the zoomed section is indicated by right boundary 1806, while highlight 1802 showing the current highlight has increased in width to represent the same relative proportion of the zoom increase. As the zoom level is increased, highlights with ranking metrics pertaining to the highlight may be displayed which are lower than those displayed at lesser zoom levels. For example, the zoomed section showed here now displays additional highlights 1808. As the zoom level is decreased, display of a highlight in the HDI 1704 may be limited to highlights having higher ranking metrics pertaining to the highlight. As described above, the gray color of band 1616 on the HDI 1704, which is less intensive then the black band 1614 on the HDI 1704, may indicate that passage 1616 has been highlighted less frequently than passage 1614.
Although specific details of illustrative methods are described with regard to the figures and other flow diagrams presented herein, it should be understood that certain acts shown in the figures need not be performed in the order described, and may be modified, and/or may be omitted entirely, depending on the circumstances. As described in this application, modules and engines may be implemented using software, hardware, firmware, or a combination of these. Moreover, the acts and methods described may be implemented by a computer, processor or other computing device based on instructions stored on one or more computer-readable storage media.
The computer-readable storage media (CRSM) may be any available physical media that can be accessed by a computing device to implement the instructions stored thereon. CRSM may include, but is not limited to, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by a computing device.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2684955 | Knowles | Sep 1954 | A |
4622627 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4985697 | Boulton | Jan 1991 | A |
5418549 | Anderson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5495268 | Pearson et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5499359 | Vijaykumar | Mar 1996 | A |
5517407 | Weiner | May 1996 | A |
5544305 | Ohmaye et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5566098 | Lucente et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5600775 | King et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5623260 | Jones | Apr 1997 | A |
5630159 | Zancho | May 1997 | A |
5640553 | Schultz | Jun 1997 | A |
5659742 | Beattie et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661635 | Huffman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663748 | Huffman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5696982 | Tanigawa et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710922 | Alley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711922 | O'Brien et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5742905 | Pepe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5761485 | Munyan | Jun 1998 | A |
5765168 | Burrows | Jun 1998 | A |
5774109 | Winksy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5813017 | Morris | Sep 1998 | A |
5845278 | Kirsch et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845301 | Rivette et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847698 | Reavey et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5923861 | Bertram et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930026 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940846 | Akiyama | Aug 1999 | A |
5956048 | Gaston | Sep 1999 | A |
5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5973681 | Tanigawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991439 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6018575 | Gross et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6034839 | Hamming | Mar 2000 | A |
6037954 | McMahon | Mar 2000 | A |
6041335 | Merritt et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047189 | Yun et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049334 | Bates et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049796 | Siitonen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064980 | Jacobi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073148 | Rowe et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6113394 | Edgar | Sep 2000 | A |
6148340 | Bittinger et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154757 | Krause et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6164974 | Carlile et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6195698 | Lillibridge et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201771 | Otsuka et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226642 | Beranek et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233318 | Picard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6272461 | Meredith et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300947 | Kanevsky | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308320 | Burch | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313828 | Chombo | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331866 | Eisenberg | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331867 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335678 | Heutschi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351750 | Duga et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6385596 | Wiser et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401086 | Bruckner | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401239 | Miron | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442651 | Crow et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6449627 | Baer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457030 | Adams et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466951 | Birkler et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484212 | Markowitz et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487669 | Waring | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493734 | Sachs et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496803 | Ho et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6529920 | Arons et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535857 | Clarke, III et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542874 | Walker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559882 | Kerchner | May 2003 | B1 |
6560699 | Konkle | May 2003 | B1 |
6574658 | Gabber et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6629138 | Lambert et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631495 | Kato et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6642947 | Feierbach | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658623 | Schilit et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6685482 | Hopp et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687878 | Eintracht et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704733 | Clark et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721869 | Senthil | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724403 | Santoro et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725227 | Li | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726487 | Dalstrom | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735583 | Bjarnestam et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6744891 | Allen | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6744967 | Kaminski et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6801751 | Wood et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6803930 | Simonson | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6804489 | Stuppy et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6829594 | Kitamura | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847966 | Sommer et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6904449 | Quinones | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912398 | Domnitz | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6933928 | Lilienthal | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938076 | Meyer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947922 | Glance | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6948135 | Ruthfield et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6953343 | Townshend | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6966029 | Ahern | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6980652 | Braitberg et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985932 | Glaser et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6992687 | Baird et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6999565 | Delaney et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7007015 | Nayak | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7009596 | Seet et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010500 | Aarnio | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010751 | Shneiderman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020654 | Najmi | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020663 | Hay et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7054914 | Suzuki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7057591 | Hautanen et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062707 | Knauft et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7071930 | Kondo et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089292 | Roderick et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7092116 | Calaway | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103848 | Barsness et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107533 | Duncan et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111250 | Hayward et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7130841 | Goel et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7133506 | Smith | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7135932 | Quadir et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149776 | Roy et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7165217 | Kondo | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181502 | Incertis | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188085 | Pelletier | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191346 | Abe et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7209888 | Frid-Nielsen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216116 | Nilsson et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7237123 | LeVine et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7246118 | Chastain et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249046 | Katsurabayashi et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7249060 | Ling | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249324 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257577 | Fagin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7287068 | Eriksson et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7290285 | McCurdy et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298851 | Hendricks et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7304635 | Seet et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310629 | Mendelson et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7313759 | Sinisi | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7350704 | Barsness et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7355591 | Sugimoto | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7375649 | Gueziec | May 2008 | B2 |
7383505 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7386480 | Sarig | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7386804 | Ho et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398244 | Keith | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7401286 | Hendricks et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7454238 | Vinayak et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7461406 | Pelly et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7496767 | Evans | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7506246 | Hollander et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506356 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509270 | Hendricks et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7519278 | Ikeda et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533152 | Stark et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7539478 | Herley et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7562032 | Abbosh et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7562038 | Brumfield et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7574653 | Croney et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7631013 | Parsons et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634429 | Narin et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7656127 | Shutt et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7657459 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7657831 | Donahue | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680849 | Heller et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7716224 | Reztlaff, II et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720892 | Healey, Jr. et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7747949 | Incertis Carro | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760986 | Beuque | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7788369 | McAllen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792756 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7835989 | Hendricks et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7849393 | Hendricks et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7865405 | Hendricks et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7865567 | Hendricks et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7865817 | Ryan et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7870022 | Bous et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7890848 | Bodin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7900133 | Cragun et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908628 | Swart et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920112 | Kurihara et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7920320 | Watson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8018431 | Zehr et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8117128 | Ishibashi | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8131647 | Siegel et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8161198 | Kikuchi | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165998 | Semerdzhiev | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175925 | Rouaix | May 2012 | B1 |
8209623 | Barletta et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8260915 | Ashear | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8312096 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8341210 | Lattyak et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8370196 | Choi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8417772 | Lin et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429028 | Hendricks et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8452797 | Paleja et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8510247 | Kane, Jr. et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8601084 | Carlander | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8725565 | Ryan | May 2014 | B1 |
8793575 | Lattyak et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
20010007980 | Ishibashi et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010025302 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010026287 | Watanabe | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010027450 | Shinoda et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010027478 | Meier et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036822 | Mead et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037328 | Pustejovsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039493 | Pustejovsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049623 | Aggarwal et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010050658 | Adams | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053975 | Kurihara | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002540 | DeMello et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010707 | Chang et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010759 | Hitson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012134 | Calaway | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026443 | Chang et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035697 | McCurdy et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046261 | Iwata et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049717 | Routtenberg et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020054059 | Schneiderman | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057286 | Markel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059415 | Chang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069222 | McNeely | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069312 | Jones | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087532 | Barritz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090934 | Mitchelmore | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091584 | Clark et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092031 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095468 | Sakata | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101447 | Carro | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020103809 | Starzl et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120635 | Joao | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123336 | Kamada | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126140 | Gorbet et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129012 | Green | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138291 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138649 | Cartmell et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143822 | Brid et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147724 | Fries et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165707 | Call | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184319 | Willner et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194474 | Natsuno et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005002 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009459 | Chastain et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012216 | Novaes | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018720 | Chang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025731 | Chastain et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028395 | Rodgers et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040970 | Miller | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046233 | Ara et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030052928 | Williams | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058265 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065642 | Zee | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069812 | Yuen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076513 | Sugimoto et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090572 | Belz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093312 | Ukita et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093382 | Himeno et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097354 | Finlay et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097361 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105679 | Krishnan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110503 | Perkes | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126123 | Kodama | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030129963 | Nurcahya | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135495 | Vagnozzi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152894 | Townshend | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163399 | Harper et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030164844 | Kravitz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182551 | Frantz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030190145 | Copperman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191737 | Steele et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204496 | Ray et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212613 | Sarig | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040002943 | Merrill et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003344 | Lai et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003398 | Donian et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015467 | Fano | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023191 | Brown et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030686 | Cardno et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044723 | Bell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049743 | Bogward | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054499 | Starzyk et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068471 | Kato | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078273 | Loeb et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078757 | Golovchinsky et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040098350 | Labrou et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117189 | Bennett | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128359 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139400 | Allam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167822 | Chasen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040201633 | Barsness et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205457 | Bent et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210561 | Shen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212941 | Haas et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040229194 | Yang | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237033 | Woolf et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239703 | Angelica | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243613 | Pourheidari | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252692 | Shim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254013 | Quraishi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254917 | Brill et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267552 | Gilliam et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268253 | DeMello et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021464 | Lindauer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022113 | Hanlon | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050044148 | Son et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044224 | Jun et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050066219 | Hoffman et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069225 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069849 | McKinney et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076012 | Manber et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088410 | Chaudhri | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091604 | Davis | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097007 | Alger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102618 | Naito | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125222 | Brown et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132281 | Pan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138007 | Amitay | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138428 | McAllen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144221 | Shin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144895 | Grimes et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154601 | Halpern et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050176438 | Li | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177562 | Raciborski | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177567 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193330 | Peters | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195975 | Kawakita | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198070 | Lowry | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222977 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223315 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228836 | Bacastow et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250439 | Leslie | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256822 | Hollingsworth | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257261 | Shraim et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262258 | Kohno et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289394 | Arrouye et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004840 | Senda | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020469 | Rast | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031316 | Forstadius | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045470 | Poslinski et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047830 | Nair et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047844 | Deng | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060048184 | Poslinski et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053045 | Danielson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057960 | Tran | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060061595 | Goede et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069697 | Shraim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071754 | Tofts et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075205 | Martin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075444 | Dillen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077897 | Kotzin | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080261 | Christal | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095404 | Adelman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098900 | King et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101328 | Albornoz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109242 | Simpkins | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123053 | Scannell, Jr. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129618 | Maier | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129924 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143558 | Albornoz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060145950 | Tanaka | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156222 | Chi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161635 | Lamkin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060175983 | Crouse et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179137 | Jennings, III et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190489 | Vohariwatt et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190568 | Patterson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195431 | Holzgrafe et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209175 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060236240 | Lebow | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240799 | Kim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250994 | Sasaki et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253441 | Nelson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253458 | Dixon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253461 | de Bonet | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256083 | Rosenberg | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265518 | Owens et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271629 | MacDowell | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281058 | Mangoaela | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282797 | Barsness et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005616 | Hay et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005757 | Finger et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014404 | Cha | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016555 | Ito et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025704 | Tsukazaki et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070039023 | Kataoka | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050346 | Goel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055926 | Christiansen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061335 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061337 | Saito et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061803 | Barrett | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073596 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078273 | Hirota | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070079236 | Schrier et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070079383 | Gopalakrishnan | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094285 | Agichtein et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094351 | Kalish et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070105536 | Tingo, Jr. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112817 | Danninger | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118533 | Ramer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130109 | King et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136660 | Gurcan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136679 | Yang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142934 | Boercsoek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150456 | Lian et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162961 | Tarrance et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174545 | Okada et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185865 | Budzik et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189719 | Furumachi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219983 | Fish | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233562 | Lidwell et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233692 | Lisa et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234209 | Williams | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238077 | Strachar | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070240187 | Beach et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242225 | Bragg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250573 | Rothschild | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070282809 | Hoeber et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283173 | Webb et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288853 | Neil | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005097 | Kleewein et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005203 | Bots et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005664 | Chandra | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016064 | Sareday et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016164 | Chandra | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027933 | Hussam | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031595 | Cho | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040233 | Wildman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059702 | Lu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066155 | Abraham | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082518 | Loftesness | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082911 | Sorotokin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089665 | Thambiratnam et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080113614 | Rosenblatt | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115224 | Jogand-Coulomb et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120101 | Johnson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120280 | Iijima et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133479 | Zelevinsky et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154908 | Datar et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080163039 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164304 | Narasimhan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165141 | Christie | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168073 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208833 | Basmov | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222552 | Batarseh et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235351 | Banga et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243788 | Reztlaff, II et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243814 | Gurcan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243828 | Reztlaff, II et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259057 | Brons | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270930 | Slosar | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281058 | Araki | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080293450 | Ryan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294674 | Reztlaff, II et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295039 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298083 | Watson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301820 | Stevens | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090094528 | Gray et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094540 | Gray et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090181649 | Bull et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090228774 | Matheny et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090231233 | Liberatore | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241054 | Hendricks | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090263777 | Kohn | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267909 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296331 | Choy | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319482 | Norlander et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100023259 | Krumm et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100081120 | Nanjiani et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095340 | Ei et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125876 | Craner et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131385 | Harrang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100164888 | Okumura et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188327 | Frid et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100284036 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100328223 | Mockarram-Dorri et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110050591 | Kim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110050594 | Kim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110057884 | Gormish et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069073 | Unger | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110112671 | Weinstein | May 2011 | A1 |
20110191710 | Jang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110267333 | Sakamoto et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295926 | Battiston et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001923 | Weinzimmer et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016774 | Dicke et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036431 | Ito et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041941 | King et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120079372 | Kandekar et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120197998 | Kessel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120227001 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130219320 | SEET; Chern Hway; et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130246157 | Puppin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140218286 | Kim; John T. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1362682 | Aug 2002 | CN |
1841373 | Oct 2006 | CN |
101120358 | Feb 2008 | CN |
1197902 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1842150 | Oct 2007 | EP |
6274493 | Sep 1994 | JP |
07078139 | Mar 1995 | JP |
09179870 | Jul 1997 | JP |
10091640 | Apr 1998 | JP |
11074882 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2000501214 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001052016 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001052025 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001195412 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001236358 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002099739 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002197079 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002259718 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002536736 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003016104 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003122969 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003513384 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003516585 | May 2003 | JP |
2003517158 | May 2003 | JP |
2003186910 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2005056041 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006011694 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006107496 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006129323 | May 2006 | JP |
2006190114 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2008071334 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008516297 | May 2008 | JP |
2008527580 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008197634 | Aug 2008 | JP |
1020020020262 | Mar 2002 | KR |
WO9720274 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO9720274 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO0045588 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0045588 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0056055 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO0075840 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0142978 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0239206 | May 2002 | WO |
WO2004055647 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2006078728 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cafesoft.com, “Security Glossary”, dated Oct. 13, 2003, retrieved from the Wayback Machine on Jul. 2, 2009 at <<http://web.archive.org/web/20031013022218/http://cafesoft.com/support/security-glossary.html>>. |
European Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 20010 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, mailed on May 26, 2011, Reztlaff, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Jun. 13, 2011, Craig S. Griffin, “Display Dependent Markup Language”. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Jun. 9, 2011, Hilliard B. Siegel, “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,215, mailed on Jul. 18, 2011, Zagorie et al., “Device-Specific Presentation Control for Electronic Book Reader Devices”, 22 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, John Lattyak, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, filed Sep. 29, 2006, Thomas Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, filed Sep. 29, 2006, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item based on a Catalog Presentation of Items.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, filed Mar. 29, 2007, John Lattyak; John Kim; Steven Moy; Laurent An Minh Nguyen, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Craig Griffin; Steven Weiss, “Display Dependent Markup Language.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,339, filed Jun. 14, 2007, David Isbister; Marshall Willilams; Nicholas Vaccaro, “Power Management Techniques for a User Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, filed Jun. 14, 2007, James Reztlaff II; John Lattyak, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, filed Jun. 14, 2007, James Reztlaff II; Thomas Ryan, “Search Results Generation and Sorting.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak, Girish Bansil Bajaj, Kevin R. Cheung, Thomas Fruchterman, Robert L. Goodwin, Kenneth P. Kiraly, Richard Moore, Subram Narasimhan, Thomas A. Ryan, Michael V. Rykov, Jon Saxton, James C. Slezak, Beryl Tomay, Aviram Zagorie, Gregg Elliott Zehr, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,376, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Kenneth Kiraly; Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Notification of a User Device to Perform an Action.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin; Xiaotian Guo, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,381, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Selecting and Providing Items in a Media Consumption System.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Girish Bansilal Bajaj; Michael Rykov; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin,, “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Subram Narasimhan; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System .” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,393, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin,, “Incremental Updates of Items .” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin; James Reztlaff II, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System .” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, filed Dec. 21, 2007, Michael Rykov; Laurent An Minh Nguyen; Steven Moy, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,215, filed Dec. 11, 2008, Aviram Zagorie; Craig Griffin; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov, “Device-Specific Presentation Control for Electronic Book Reader Devices.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,629, filed Jan. 9, 2009, John Johnston; Weiping Dou; Steven Chase, “Antenna Placement on Portable Device .” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,663, filed Jan. 9, 2009, Chris Li; Steven Chase, “Surface Mount Clip for Routing and Grounding Cables.” |
Cleveland, Jr. et al., “Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” OET Bulletin 56, Fourth Edition, Aug. 1999, 38 pages. |
Cleveland, Jr., et al, “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, Aug. 1997, 84 pages. |
Means, et al., “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields”, OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01, Jun. 2001, 57 pages. |
OQO “A Full PC That Fits in Your Pocket” Retrieved on Sep. 22, 2008 at <<http://www.oqo.com/support/documentation.html>>. |
PCT Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US 08/57848, mailed Jul. 7, 2008 (9 pages). |
PCT Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US 08/64387, mailed Sep. 9, 2008 (2 pages). |
Navarro, et al., “Modern Information Retrieval, Chapter 8: Indexing and Searching”, Jan. 1, 1999, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, New York, pp. 191-228. |
BarnesandNoble.com, “Barnes and Noble Homepage”, retrieved on Aug. 2, 2001 http://web.archive.org/web/19981202183957/http://www.barnesandnoble.com/, Dec. 2, 1998. |
Cavanaugh, “EBooks and Accommodations”, Teaching Exceptional Children, vol. 35, No. 2, Copyright 2002 CEC, 6 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2011 for Japanese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 6 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Aug. 4, 2011, Agarwal et al., “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 39 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Aug. 19, 2011, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 13 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, mailed on Aug. 26, 2011, James R. Rezlaff II, “Search Results Generation and Sorting”, 10 pages. |
Beigbeder et al., “An Information Retrieval Model Using the Fuzzy Proximity Degree of Term Occurences”, 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1018-1022. |
Biskup, J., et al, “Towards a Credential-Based Implementation of Compound Access Control Policies” SACMAT '04, Proceedings of the ninth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, Jun. 4, 2004, NY, retrieved from the internet: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=990036.990042 (retrieved Nov. 9, 2010. |
Breu, M. et al., “The Medoc Distrubuted Electronic Library: Accounting and Security Aspects”, Electronic Publishing, New Models and Opportunities, Proceedings of an ICCC/IFIP Conference, Apr. 14, 1997, pp. 237-249. |
Gladney, H. M.: “Access Control for Large Collections”, NY, vol. 15, No. 2, Apr. 1, 1997, pp. 154-194. |
Henke, H. “Survey on Electronic Book Features”, Open eBook Forum, online, Mar. 20, 2002, pp. 1-14, retrieved from the internet: <http://www.openebook.org/doc—library/surveys/IDPF—eBook—Features—2002.pdf> retrieved Nov. 8, 2010. |
Ziviani, N ED, Baeza-Yates R. et at: “Modern Information Retrieval, Text Operations”, Jan. 1, 1999, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, NY, pp. 163-190. |
Zobel, J. et al., “Inverted Files for Text Search Engines” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, No. 2, Jul. 1, 2006, pp. 1-56, NY, NY. |
“A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace”, Jul. 2005, IETF, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 at http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4122.pdf. |
Bellwood, et al., “UDDI Version 2.04 API Specification UDDI Committee Specification, Jul. 19, 2002”, Oasis, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/20050314033213/www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/tcspecs.htm. |
PCT Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US10/22060, mailed Mar. 8, 2010 (7 pages). |
“Universal Unique Identifier”, dated Dec. 16, 2002. The Open Group, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/20021216070918/http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9629399/apdxa.htm. |
“Web Services Architecture: W3C Working Group Note Feb. 11, 2004”, Feb. 11, 2004, W3C, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/2004040205185/http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/277,894, filed Mar. 29, 2006, Jateen P. Parekh, Gregg E. Zehr, and Subram Narasimhan,“Reader Device Content Indexing”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, filed Jan. 27, 2009, Rajiv Kotesh Ghanta; Marcos Frid; Joseph J. Hebenstreit; John T. Kim, “Electronic Device With Haptic Feedback.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, filed Feb. 6, 2009, Scott Dixon; Eriel Thomas, “Bundled Digital Content.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, filed Mar. 31, 2009, Amit Agarwal; Zaur Kambarov; Tom Killalea, “Questions on Highlighted Passages.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/331,528, filed Jan. 27, 2009, Chris Green, “User Interface Cluster.” |
Bradley, “Plastic Shape Shifter”, retreived on May 7, 2009 at <<http://www.reactivereports.com/61/61—3.html>>, Chemistry WebMagazine, Issue No. 61, Dec. 2006, 2 pgs. |
Cavanaugh “EBooks and Accommodations”, Teaching Expectional Children vol. 35 No. 2 p. 56-61 Copyright 2002 CEC, pp. 56-61. |
Chi et al. “eBooks with Indexes that Reorganize Conceptually”, CHI2004, Apr. 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria ACM 1-58113-703-6/04/0004, pp. 1223-1226. |
Davison et al. “The Use of eBooks and Interactive Multimedia, as Alternative Forms of Technical Documentation” SIGDOC'05, Sep. 21-23, 2005, Conventry, United Kingdom, Copyright 2005 ACM 1-59593-175-9/05/0009, pp. 108-115. |
Elspass, et al., “Portable Haptic Interface with Active Functional Design”, In Proceedings SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, Newport Beach, California, vol. 3668, Mar. 1999, 926-932. |
“Haptic History—Machine Haptics (Expansion)” retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://hapticshistory.chc61.uci.cu/haptic/site/pages/Machine-Haptics-Became—5.php.>> from Google's cache, text-only version as webpage appeared on Apr. 16, 2009, 8 pgs. |
Jones, et al., “Development of a Tactile Vest”, IEEE Computer Society, In the Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Inerfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Mar. 27-28, 2004, pp. 82-89. |
Leutwyler, “Shape-shifting Polymer Gels”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=shape-shifting-polymer-ge&print=true>>, Scientific American, Nov. 9, 2000, 1 pg. |
Nakatani, et al., “3D Form Display with Shape Memory Alloy”, In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Teleexistence (ICAT), 2003, pp. 179-184. |
“Shape Memory Polymer”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape—Memory—Polymer>>, Wikipedia, 8 pgs. |
Sohn et al. “Development of a Standard Format for eBooks”, SAC2002, Madrid, Spain, 2002 ACM 1-58113-445-2/02/0, pp. 535-540. |
Wellman, et al., “Mechanical Design and Control of a High-Bandwidth Shape Memory Alloy Tactile Display”, Springer-Verlag, In the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, Barcelona, Spain, Jun. 1997, pp. 56-66, 12 pgs. |
Yoshikawa, et al., “Vertical Drive Micro Actuator for Haptic Display Using Shape Memory Alloy Thin Film”, IEE Japan, Papers of Technical Meeting on Micromachine and Sensor System, Journal Code L2898B, vol. MSS-05, No. 21-44, 2005, pp. 103-108. |
“Annotation Engine,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <http://cyber.law .harvard. edulproj ectsl annotate.html> [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
“Annotator Instructions,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/annotate/instructions.html>>, also found at <<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cite/instructions.html>>, [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
“Annotator Wishlist,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School r <http://cyber.law.harvard.edulcite/annotate.cgi ?action=print&markup ;center=; view=http%3A%2F%2Fcy . . . > [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
Roscheisen, M., et al., “Beyond Browsing: Shared Comments, SOAPs, Trails, and On-Line Communities,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 27:739-749, 1995. |
Canadian Office Action mailed Apr. 14, 2009 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2594573, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed May 9, 2008 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
Translated Chinese Second Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
Translated Chinese Third Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
Carter, S., et al., “Digital Graffiti: Public Annotation of Multimedia Content,” Proceedings o/the CHI2004, Vienna, Austria, Apr. 24-29, 2004, pp. 1207-1210. |
Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 22, 2009, issued in corresponding European Patent Application No. EP 06 71 8773.2, filed Jan. 18, 2006. |
European Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
European Search report mailed Dec. 22, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed Feb. 23, 2010, 15 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Jan. 25, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Apr. 28, 2011, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”. |
International Search Report mailed Sep. 9, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US/08/64387, filed May 21, 2008, 1 page. |
International Search Report mailed Aug. 15, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US07/89105, filed Dec. 28, 2007, 2 pages. |
International Search Report mailed Aug. 15, 2008, in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US08/57829, filed Mar. 21, 2008, 1 page. |
International Search Report mailed Jul. 7, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US08/57848, filed Mar. 31, 2008, 2 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US 08/64389, mailed on Jan. 28, 2009, 7 pgs. |
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2006/001752, mailed on Jul. 27, 2006, 8 pgs. |
“Say NO To Third Voice,” Worldzone.net, 1999-2004, <http://worldzone.netiinternetipixelsnttv/index.html> [retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
“The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School: Annotation Engine,” Harvard.Edu, 1999-2004, <http://cyber.iaw.harvard.eduJprojects/annotate.html> [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
Marshall, C.C., “The Future of Annotation in a Digital (Paper) World,” Proceedings o/the 35th Annual GSLIS Clinic, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, Urbana, 11, Mar. 22-24, 1998, pp. 1-19. |
Kumar, A., “Third Voice Trails off . . . ,” Wired News, 2004, <http://www.wired.comlnews/printIO. 1294,42803 ,00.html> [retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
Desmoulins et al., “Pattern-Based Annotations on E-books: From Personal to Shared Didactic Content”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless adn Mobile Techniques in Education, 2002, 4 pages. |
Leach et al, “A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace”, Jul. 2005, IETF, retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 at http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4122.pdf, 32 pgs. |
Card et al., “3Book: A 3D Electronic Smart Book”, AVI'04 May 25-28, 2004, Hallipoli, Italy, ACM 2004, pp. 303-307. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Oct. 10, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017259.X, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 7 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Aug. 25, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880024964.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 6 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 9 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2011 for Japanese patent application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 3 pages. |
Mercier et al., “Sphere of influence Model in Information retrieval”, IEEE 2005 International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 120-125. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Jan. 24, 2012, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No 12/414,914, mailed on Jan. 4, 2012, Agarwal et al., “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 41 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Oct. 14, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 38 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Oct. 24, 2011, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Nov. 10, 2011, James R. Retzalff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 16 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Nov. 25, 2011, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items,” 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Nov. 8, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, Thomas Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 10 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357 , mailed on Dec. 21, 2011, Reztlaff et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, mailed on Dec. 23, 2011, James R. Rezlaff II et al., “Search Results Generation and Sorting”, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on Dec. 29, 2011, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 21 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, dated Dec. 8, 2011, John Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, mailed on Sep. 12, 2011, James R. Retzlaff II, “Managing Status of Search Index Generation”, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, mailed on Sep. 26, 2011, Michael Rykov, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples”, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Sep. 27,2011, Thomas Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 17 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 17 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 24, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017259.X, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 5 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Jan. 4, 2012, 16 pgs. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374 mailed on Oct. 16, 2012, Ryan et al, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 13 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on Oct. 5, 2012, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 29 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No 11/763,374, mailed on Feb. 13, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,393, mailed on Feb. 16, 2012, John Lattyak et al., “Incremental Updates of Items”, 24 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Mar. 28, 2012, Tom Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Mar. 30, 2012, Scott Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 12 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed May 17, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9 a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 5 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed May 21, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Apr. 23, 2012, Siegel et al., “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Apr. 26, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on May 4, 2012, Hilliard B. Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed May 9, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 12 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Jun. 27, 2012, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 7 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Jun. 27, 2012, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 47 pages. |
On-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Jun. 6, 2012, James. R. Retzlaff II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369 mailed on Jun. 7, 2012, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 20 pages. |
Canadian Office Action mailed Jul. 6, 2012 for Canadian patent application No. 2594573, a counterpart foreign application of US patent application No. 8,131,647, 5 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office mailed Oct. 12, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 6 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Sep. 18, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,131,647, 4 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, mailed on Aug. 15, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 24 pages. |
US Pat. Pub. No. 2004081300 dated Apr. 29, 2004, corresponds to Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2002-259718, 14 pages. |
US Patent No. 7,340,436 dated Mar. 4, 2008, corresponds to Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2003-513384, 7 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Dec. 13, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 4 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 8 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Aciton mailed Feb. 1, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 19 pages. |
Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of US patent application No. 7,865,817, 4 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 6, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,378,979, 13 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Jul. 10, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,377, 8 pages. |
European Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2013 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 6 pages. |
Goodreads.com, “About goodreads”, 2006, 2 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 17, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-509529, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 7 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501124, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 6 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Apr. 12, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 5 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed May 24, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501124, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 7 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed May 31, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-509529, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 5 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 23, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 4 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Feb. 6, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Feb. 14, 2013, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 47 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Feb. 21, 2013, Inventor #1, “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 76 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Feb. 28, 2013, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 17 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Apr. 22, 2013, Ryan et al., “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 17 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Apr. 8, 2013, Bajaj et al, “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 7 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on May 14, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 24 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed on May 2, 2013,Ryan et al., “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 12 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Jun 4, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 26 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Jun. 6, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 27 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. 11/693,685, mailed on Aug. 15, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 24 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,376, mailed on Aug. 19, 2013, Kiraly et al., “Notification of a User Device to Perform an Action”, 16 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Aug. 27, 2013, Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 13 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Sep. 13, 2013, Agarwal et al, “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 35 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on Sep. 16, 2013, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 23 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Sep. 24, 2013, John Lattyak, “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 27 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Sep. 5, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 6 pages. |
Oki et al., “The Infomation Bus—An Architecture for Extensive Distributed Systems”, ACM, 1993, 11 pages. |
Palm Reader Handbook, Palm Inc., 2000, 56 pages. |
International Search Report mailed Sep. 9, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US08/64387, filed May 21, 2008, 1 page. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Nov. 5, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed on Oct. 30, 2013, Thomas A. Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 14 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Oct. 16, 2013, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”,18 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Oct. 8, 2013, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages. |
Canadian Office Action mailed May 29, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2684580, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 3 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5 , a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 13 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Jan. 6, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,378,979, 12 pages. |
Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,378,979, 9 pages. |
European Office Action mailed Apr. 7, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,131,647, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Feb. 10, 2014, Amit D. Agarwal, “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 40 pages. |
Homer, et al., “Instant HTML”, Wrox Press, 1997, pp. 76-79. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Jan. 14, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2011-548210, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,378,979, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Feb. 14, 2014, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 14 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Mar. 10, 2014, Craig S. Griffin, “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 42 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Mar. 14, 2014, Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, mailed on Mar. 24, 2014, John Lattyak, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 26 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, mailed on Mar. 27, 2014, James R. Retzlaff II, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Apr. 25, 2014, John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 4 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on May 14, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 21 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on May 2, 2014, James R. Retzlaff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 27 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Jun. 2, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 24 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,446, mailed on Jun. 24, 2014, Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 19 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,115, mailed on Jun. 4, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Invariant Referencing in Digital Works”, 11 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Jul. 2, 2014, Retzlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages. |
“Trilogy Definition”, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 1999, 2 pages. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
“Mastering to Become a True Manager, Well-selected commands for an efficient event log management, Part 1,” Windows Server World, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 86-96, IDG Japan, Japan, Feb. 1, 2004. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Dec. 17, 2013, James R. Retzlaff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 25 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Dec. 24, 2013, Thomas A. Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 16 pages. |
Canadian Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2684955, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 3 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 16, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 18 pages. |
Barnes & Noble, “Nook User Guide”, retrieved from the Internet Feb 5, 2013, 120 Pages. |
Kindle Community, Discussions—Screen Saver, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 06, 2009 at <<http://www.amazon.com/tag/kindle/forum?cdForum=Fx1D7SY3BVSESG&cdThread=Tx28QGUBE29L22J>>, 4 Pages. |
“Kobo Wireless eReader & Desktop Application User Guide”, Feb 2011, 170 Pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Jan. 15, 2015, Gilles Jean Roger Belin, “Cover Display”, 45 Pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Feb. 21, 2014, Gilles Jean Roger Belin, “Cover Display”, 36 Pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Feb. 25, 2014, Sailesh Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 11 Pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,984, mailed on Mar. 15, 2013, Kim, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readern”, 10 Pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on 7/25/13, Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 11 Pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Aug. 12, 2014, Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 6 Pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on 8/13/14, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 40 Pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Sep. 11, 2013, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 31 Pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,984, mailed on Sep. 27, 2012, John T. Kim, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Reader”, 9 Pages. |
Copy of the Canadian Office Action mailed Dec. 15, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2681754, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 5 Pages. |
Copy of the Mintues of the Oral Proceedings mailed on Nov. 27, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 8,131,647, 13 Pages. |
Copy of the European Office Action mailed Sep. 23, 2014 for European patent application No. 08732668.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 7 Pages. |
Copy of the European Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 8,131,647, 31 Pages. |
Malloy, et al., “Google Search”, retrieved on Sep. 17, 2014 at <<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GoogleSearch&oldid=118323867>>, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Mar. 27, 2007, 6 Pages. |
Translated Copy of the Japanese Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2011-548210, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, 4 Pages. |
Translated Copy of the Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,677, 2 Pages. |
Translated copy of the Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 7 Pages. |
Translated copy of the Korean Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2014 for Korean patent application No. Oct. 2009-7024280, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 10 Pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Jan. 6, 2015, Scott Dixon, “Bundled Digital Content”, 15 Pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Jan. 9, 2015, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 13 Pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. 13/722,961, mailed on Oct. 10, 2014, John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 8 Pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,446, mailed on Oct. 31, 2014, Linsey R. Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 17 Pages. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for Application U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Oct. 6, 2014, Lattyak et al., “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device ”, 16 Pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Oct. 7, 2014, Siegelet al., “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 Pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Nov. 6, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 29 Pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Aug. 28, 2014, Griffin et al., “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 52 Pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on Sep. 24, 2014, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 31 Pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on 9/4/14, Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 10 Pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Feb. 05, 2015, John Lattyak, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device”, 21 Pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Feb. 26, 2015, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 45 Pages. |
Copy of the Canadian Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2688002, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 5 Pages. |
Translated copy of the Chinese Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2015 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 10 Pages. |
Copy of the Japanese Office Action mailed Mar. 10, 2015 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 19 Pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Apr. 24, 2015, James R. Retzlaff II, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 10 Pages. |