This invention relates to the field of single and multi-phase ac power flow control systems, and more particularly to agile systems and methods comprising identical impedance injection modules that can be reconfigured and redeployed.
Transformerless power flow control systems have been developed, having reduced size and weight compared with systems containing isolation transformers. Equipment deployed in transformerless power flow control systems is comprised of highly complex and customized installations, including procurement of components that require long planning cycles and modification of protection systems prior to installation. Accordingly, there is a need in the art for agile power flow control systems having identical and standardized impedance injection modules for quick and efficient configuration, deployment, reconfiguration and redeployment. Preferably these systems will offer deployment flexibility with respect to power flow control level and current capacity; also, installation with minimal disturbance to existing fault monitoring systems.
Impedance injection module 10 includes a communication and control block 3 which comprises an antenna 4 for receiving and transmitting wireless signals 1, a transceiver 5 coupled to antenna 4, and a microprocessor 6 coupled to the transceiver 5 and to a memory 7. Memory 7 contains instructions executable by microprocessor 6 for operating impedance injection module 10, including transmission of configuration parameters to power switching assembly 8, to be further described in reference to
For highly efficient power transfer, and specifically to support the ability to transmit reactive power over power transmission lines, each of the impedance injection modules is configurable to adjust line reactance while having a smaller effect on line resistance.
Although many power flow control systems comprise three phases, the present invention may be described in reference to a generalized single or multi-phase system and can be used with any number of phases. Since the equipment installed in each phase is identical, only phase A 32 is described. Phase A includes XAU 33a, the upstream impedance of the transmission line, and carries an electric current IA 34, shown as a vector quantity having both magnitude and direction. XAD 33b is the downstream impedance of the transmission line. IA may be represented as a sine wave versus time, having an amplitude and an instantaneous phase angle. A bank 35 of impedance injection modules 10 is shown, configured as an m×n matrix of impedance injection modules, wherein each impedance injection module is capable of impressing a synthesized impedance to the current flowing on line A 32, IA 34. Each impedance injection module 10 impresses the synthesized impedance across terminals such as 21b and 22b in phase B of the figure, where terminals 21 and 22 are defined in reference to
For responding to potential faults in one or more impedance injection modules in a bank 35 of impedance injection modules, each bank 35 of impedance injection modules 10 may be augmented with a bypass switch 38, further described in cross-referenced patent application, Ser. No. 15/694,605. Alternatively, bypass switch 38 may be activated in response to a fault in a transmission line such as A, B, C, wherein the fault is external to the bank 35 of impedance injection modules 10.
Each impedance injection module 10 in each bank 35 of impedance injection modules 10 is identical, and this standardization leads to an agile power flow control system 30a, wherein the impedance injection modules 10 can be efficiently configured, reconfigured, and replaced if necessary. As used herein and in the claims to follow, “identical” as used with reference to identical impedance injection modules means of the same design and construction, though may incorporate parts supplied by more than one vendor. Obviously each identical impedance injection module will differ from the others in such ways as having a unique serial number and electronic identification, and normally will have programming that may differ from at least some other impedance injection modules in the same power flow control system. In that regard, the configuration and reconfiguration parameters may include parameters that include programming changes allowing the impedance injection modules to collectively be remotely coordinated to execute more than a single power flow control algorithm at different times.
Contributing to an agile power system having scalability along with minimum size, weight and cost, each of the plurality of impedance injection modules 10 is capable of providing an impedance injection level sufficient to optimize a reactive power transfer of at least 2 kVA per kilogram weight of the impedance injection module. Furthermore, in pursuit of a simplified yet capable power flow control system 30a, there are no shunt components connected between the phases: there is no requirement for shunt components, and shunt components are preferably omitted in all embodiments of the present invention. Also, in power flow control system 30a, when installed and in operation, the impedance injection modules 10 float with respect to ground and there is no requirement for a ground isolation transformer. In addition, the TL-SSSCs (transformerless converters) of the present invention do not require isolation from the transmission line voltage, even though the line voltage may be as high as 765 kV for example. Accordingly, transformers for either ground isolation or line voltage isolation are omitted in all embodiments of the present invention. In embodiments of the present invention, isolation from ground is achieved by spacing the line around 10 meters or more above ground, by shielding the impedance injection modules within metal enclosures, and by providing corona rings (curved annular surfaces) that limit the electric field emanating from an impedance injection module. This limited electric field is insufficient to create corona discharge.
It is an advantage of power flow control system 30a that it can be configured to avoid the creation of new sub-synchronous resonances arising from installation of the modular power flow control system; the power flow control system 30a can also be configured to lessen the severity of pre-existing sub-synchronous resonances. Sub-synchronous resonances occur at frequencies below the primary transmission frequency which is typically 60 Hz in the United States. Lessening the severity of pre-existing sub-synchronous resonances by the power flow control system 30a of the present invention can be achieved by simply tailoring the control of the impedance injections to also simultaneously add to the injections, waveforms counteracting the pre-existing sub-synchronous resonances with no change in the power control systems 30a themselves, thereby preserving the ability to use identical and standardized impedance injection modules.
The deployment and operation of an impedance injection module includes determining the values of m and n in the one or more banks of impedance injection modules to be deployed at a specified location. The value of m will depend on the line impedance and the total voltage injection desired. The value of n will be determined by the required current capacity of each phase, given the current capacity of the individual impedance injection modules 10. The advantage of splitting each phase into n legs and of placing m impedance injection modules in each leg instead of using a single leg and/or a single impedance injection module is to better facilitate the use of identical injection modules to satisfy multiple installation requirements in a much more efficient manner. In particular, the use of n legs allows the application of lower current capacity impedance injection modules to meet substantially any current requirements for all phases of high current transmission lines while not providing an excessive current capacity for lower current transmission lines. Similarly, the use of m injection modules for each leg allows the tailoring of the voltage injection capacity to the then present requirements, again without providing excessive capacity where such capacity is not needed. The foregoing provides an exemplary method for controlling power flow in a multi-phase power transmission system, wherein the impedance injection modules are installed in an m×n bank of impedance injection modules.
In the simplest case of AC injection onto a transmission line, a single injection module 10 may inject a pair of DC voltages to form a symmetric injection, with one pulse in each half cycle of the injection waveform. In this case, the fundamental frequency of the injected pair of positive and negative pulses will be asserted, with the remaining frequencies filtered out by the line reactance.
System 50 may be implemented as one or more mobile containers having the desired number of impedance injection modules set up inside, in addition to a bypass switch 38, according to a configuration determined by the support system 2, described in reference to
Since the mobile flow control system 50 of
Where possible, various systems and subsystems to be deployed can be pre-configured in the trailers, and to the extent that on-site assembly and/or interconnection is necessary, all jumpers and other hardware may be prefabricated, labeled and provided in the respective wheeled vehicle transporting the devices on which the hardware will be used. Similarly, all jumpers, etc. needed to interconnect devices on multiple wheeled vehicles, if not pre-assembled, may at least be pre-fabricated to properly interconnect such devices (trailers) once the trailers are parked in the desired positions, which positions are also pre-laid out. Thus, the time to deploy is greatly reduced, as is the time of debugging and verifying the system once deployed. Also, since fewer errors can be anticipated if the systems are configured and installed at the factory, the cost of system debug and verification, once deployed, is reduced. Not only is the time to deploy reduced, but the overall cost to deploy is also greatly reduced by minimizing on-site labor requirements, and even on-site labor skill level requirement, as on-site labor costs are much greater than in-factory labor costs.
Thus the present invention has a number of aspects, which aspects may be practiced alone or in various combinations or sub-combinations, as desired. While certain preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed and described herein for purposes of illustration and not for purposes of limitation, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the full breadth of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/622,441 filed Jan. 26, 2018, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. The disclosure of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/694,605 entitled “Modular FACTS Devices with External Fault Current Protection” is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3955657 | Bossi | May 1976 | A |
3959985 | Schulze, Sr. | Jun 1976 | A |
RE29994 | Bossi | May 1979 | E |
4167670 | Ingold | Sep 1979 | A |
4188536 | DallaPiazza | Feb 1980 | A |
4293902 | White | Oct 1981 | A |
4322817 | Kuster | Mar 1982 | A |
4355351 | Schwarz | Oct 1982 | A |
4683461 | Torre | Jul 1987 | A |
4823250 | Kolecki et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4908569 | Fest | Mar 1990 | A |
5149277 | LeMaster | Sep 1992 | A |
5216285 | Hilsenteger et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5231929 | Theurer et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5270913 | Limpaecher | Dec 1993 | A |
5340326 | LeMaster | Aug 1994 | A |
5741605 | Gillett et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5875235 | Mohajeri | Feb 1999 | A |
5892351 | Faulk | Apr 1999 | A |
5917779 | Ralson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5949148 | Wagner | Sep 1999 | A |
6061259 | DeMichele | May 2000 | A |
6075349 | Okayama | Jun 2000 | A |
6134105 | Lueker | Oct 2000 | A |
6198257 | Belehradek et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6296065 | Carrier | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6340851 | Rinaldi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356467 | Belehradek, Jr. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6397156 | Bachmann et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6460626 | Carrier | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6477154 | Cheong et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489694 | Chass | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6643566 | Lehr et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6675912 | Carrier | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6909943 | Lehr et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7141894 | Kraus | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7325150 | Lehr et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7440300 | Konishi et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7453710 | Baurle et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7466819 | Lehr et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469759 | Botzelmann | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7642757 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7729147 | Wong et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
8019484 | Korba et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8189351 | Chung et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8210418 | Landoll et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8249836 | Yoon et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8395916 | Harrison | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8434657 | Landoll et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8649883 | Lu et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8755184 | Peng et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8767427 | Wallmeier | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8867244 | Trainer et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9065345 | Rigbers et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9130458 | Crookes et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9241397 | Kaneko et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9325173 | Varma et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9331482 | Huang | May 2016 | B2 |
9332602 | Roberts et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9473028 | Hoyt | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9590424 | Grisenti et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9659114 | He et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9735702 | Hu et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9847626 | Mauri Lopez | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10141724 | Jung et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20020057342 | Yoshiyama et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20040049321 | Lehr et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040132497 | Weese | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050073200 | Divan et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050160682 | Quadrio | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169243 | Lehr et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050169297 | Lehr et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060127715 | Botzelmann | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070230094 | Carlson | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250217 | Yoon et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080103737 | Yoon et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080177425 | Korba et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080205088 | Chung et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090173033 | Baxter, Jr. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090202241 | Yu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100014322 | Harrison | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100094477 | Berggren et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20120024515 | Wei | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120085612 | Churchill | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120134107 | Peng et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120205981 | Varma et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120312862 | Landoll et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130068271 | Bqoor | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130094264 | Crookes et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130128636 | Trainer et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130155662 | Goschl | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169055 | Bats et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130256613 | Hyde et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130261821 | Lu et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130346571 | Putseyeu et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140129195 | He et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132229 | Huang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140246914 | Chopra et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140312859 | Ramsay et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150108897 | Kaneko et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150134137 | Perju et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150219554 | Hedges et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150236509 | Divan et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150293517 | Higgins | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160036341 | Jang et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160273211 | Brewer et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160369689 | Brewer et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170170660 | Hu et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170237255 | Inam et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180034280 | Pedersen | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180316163 | Jung | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190006835 | Inam et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005067117 | Jul 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 14, 2018; International Application No. PCT/US2018/034476”, Aug. 14, 2018. |
Albasri, Fadhel A. et al., “Performance Comparison of Distance Protection Schemes for Shunt—FACTS Compensated Transmission Lines”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 22, No. 4, Oct. 2007, pp. 2116-2125. |
Bhaskar, M. A. et al., “Impact of FACTS devices on distance protection in Transmission System”, 2014 IEEE National Conference on Emerging Trends in New & Renewable Energy Sources and Energy Management (NCET NRES EM), Dec. 16, 2014, pp. 52-58. |
Samantaray, S. R. , “A Data-Mining Model for Protection of FACTS-Based Transmission Line”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 28, No. 2, Apr. 2013, pp. 612-618. |
“Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2019; U.S. Appl. No. 15/694,605”, filed Sep. 12, 2019. |
“Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 9, 2019; European Patent Application No. 19153095.5”, dated Sep. 9, 2019. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 4, 2019; U.S. Appl. No. 16/035,976”, filed Apr. 10, 2019. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 27, 2020; U.S. Appl. No. 15/694,605”, filed Jan. 27, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190237971 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62622441 | Jan 2018 | US |