This application is the U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2008/003522, filed Apr. 30, 2008, which designated the United States and has been published as International Publication No. WO 2008/135225 and which claims the priority of German Patent Application, Serial No. 10 2007 021 056.8, filed May 4, 2007, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d).
The invention relates to an agitator which is particularly intended for abrasive media. Increased wear due to abrasion occurs when abrasive media are stirred, such as suspensions with high concentrations of solid matter which may occur, for example, when processing ore in, for example, oxidation autoclaves for refining gold and copper, so that the agitator has only relatively short operating times before it must be replaced.
Attempts have been made to apply coatings of abrasion-resistant materials, for example hard metals, metal carbides or the like, on the agitators for reducing abrasion. Such coatings are not only extremely expensive, but application of the coatings can also partially weaken the support material, which may cause additional problems. Extremely corrosive conditions are present particularly when processing ore using wet-chemical processes, which necessitates the use of particularly resistant materials, such as titanium compositions, for the support material. However, such coatings which improve the wear resistance frequently do not exhibit sufficient chemical resistance, so that they can be removed by corrosion.
So-called disk agitators represent one particular type of radially conveying agitator; disk agitators include a support disk to which several agitator blades are attached. The agitator blades are attached to the support disk in a substantially perpendicular and radial direction. The support disk in this type of disk agitator is oriented substantially horizontally, and the agitator blades are attached to the support disk at about half the blade height. Disk agitators having this design can have a different number of agitator blades and/or the agitator blades can have blade surfaces of different sizes.
It is an object of the invention to provide an agitator, in particular for abrasive media, with a support disk, wherein agitator blades are attached to the support disk in a substantially vertical and substantially radial direction relative to the support disk, and which has a hub for receiving an agitator shaft, wherein the agitator is designed to resist abrasion and has a longer operating time when used as designed.
According to the invention, an agitator, in particular for abrasive media, with a support disk is provided, to which agitator blades are attached in a substantially perpendicular and substantially radial direction relative to the support disk, and which has a hub for receiving an agitator shaft, wherein the agitator is characterized in that the sides of the agitator blades and/or the region of the blade attachment to the support disk are formed so as to substantially prevent vortex shedding.
With the agitator of the invention, the geometry of the agitator is selected and adjusted in the region of the support disk, of the agitator blade, of the agitator blade attachment and of the agitator hub or the like so as to reduce abrasion and improve the operating time, with the result that the wear characteristic due to abrasion can be significantly reduced or even completely eliminated even when the abrasive media have high concentrations of solid matter, a large applied agitator power and high circumferential speeds. The geometry of the agitator of the invention hereby is changed and optimized to attain agitators which have longer operating times, thus reducing maintenance and replacement intervals of the agitators, so that facility downtimes can be significantly shortened.
Preferably, for a design which effectively prevents vortex shedding, the respective agitator blade has a pitch angle β with respect to the radial direction from about 10° to 60°, preferably from about 20° to 50°. This prevents shedding of vortices on the agitator blades, thereby improving the flow pattern around the blades and hence also significantly improving the abrasion resistance of the agitator.
According to a preferred alternative embodiment of the invention, the geometry of the agitator blade is constructed so as to substantially prevent vortex shedding, i.e., the geometry of the agitator blade itself is optimized, particularly on the side facing away from the flow. This reduces or prevents impact and sliding abrasion on the trailing end of the agitator blades, so that such agitator becomes more wear resistant.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the respective agitator blade has a radius (R) in the region where the blade is attached to the support disk, with the radius facing the flow direction. This radius R has preferably a value of R=(0.1−1.0)×diameter of the agitator. Changing the shape of the respective agitator blades can more effectively prevent vortex shedding, wherein extremely advantageous and wear-resistant flow patterns around the blades are obtained particularly in combination with a corresponding pitch of the agitator blades in the radial direction having the aforementioned angular ranges.
According to an alternative or additional embodiment, the agitator blades of the agitator of the invention may be attached with one side on the support disk, so that the support disk protects the agitator blades against impact and sliding wear particularly in the trailing edge region. Optionally, not only the shape of the support disk can be altered in a suitable manner, but also the number of the support disk parts or support disk elements, whereby the support disk may preferably be designed to substantially prevent vortex shedding in the attachment region of the agitator blades, and/or the support disk may include several support disk parts.
According to an alternative or additional preferred embodiment of the invention, the support disk may include a recess on the side of the agitator blades facing away from the flow, for reducing the wear surface for the abrasive effects on the support disk and on the attachment location of the agitator blades.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, a flow around the agitator blades with unfavorable vortex formation can be prevented by arranging wing-shaped elements on the inner edge of the agitator blades.
Optionally, the agitator blade may be completely or at least partially coated with an abrasion-resistant material at those locations that are at risk of being abraded. This can further improve the operating time and the resilience of such agitator even under extremely severe operating conditions.
In summary, it is important for the agitator according to the invention that improvements are attained with the help of geometric means at those locations that are at risk of being abraded, e.g., the sides of the agitator blades facing away from the flow and/or in the regions where the blade is attached to the support disk, which result in a design that is substantially free from vortex shedding. With these measures, in particular impact and sliding wear can be substantially reduced when such agitator is used as intended, in particular a radial conveyor in form of a disk agitator, and the operating times of such agitator can be improved without requiring additional time-consuming and expensive measures on the agitator, such as coatings and the like. With the solutions according to the invention, in particular those measures are proposed which allow a reduction of vortex shedding which is detrimental for the wear characteristic and establish more advantageous flow conditions around the blades, without adversely affecting the basic efficiency of such agitator. The invention can suppress the wear mechanism by altering the shape of the agitator, producing an agitator with extended operating times and significant savings for maintenance and system downtimes. It will be understood that the agitator with the improved geometry should not have a lower efficiency.
The invention will now be described in more detail with reference to preferred embodiments which are not to be viewed as limiting, and with reference to the appended drawing. In the drawings, the embodiments of the agitators are illustrated in a corresponding FIG. in a top view and underneath in a side view. In the drawing:
The rotation direction of the agitator shaft and hence of the support disk are indicated in the figures of the drawings by an arrow.
In addition, if applicable, identical or similar elements are indicated in the figures of the drawings with identical reference symbols.
In the configuration of the agitator 1a according to the invention illustrated in
In the configuration of the agitator 1a according to
In the embodiment of the agitator 1e according to
In the modified embodiment according to
Accordingly,
As seen in
Although different, separate changes in the geometry of support disk 2a to 2h and/or changes in the design geometry of the agitator blades 3a to 3h were described above with reference to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 021 056 | May 2007 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/003522 | 4/30/2008 | WO | 00 | 11/3/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/135225 | 11/13/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1084210 | Howard | Jan 1914 | A |
3222141 | Donaldson | Dec 1965 | A |
3470265 | Sprow | Sep 1969 | A |
3526467 | Kime | Sep 1970 | A |
3920227 | Davis, Jr. | Nov 1975 | A |
5344235 | Weetman et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
6254335 | Ekholm et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6325532 | King et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6568907 | Horng et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6637926 | Auad | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6712582 | Lin et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
20050007874 | Roszczenko et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 795 244 | Sep 1959 | DE |
34 46 741 | Jul 1986 | DE |
36 35 642 | Apr 1988 | DE |
203 13 722 | Jan 2004 | DE |
102005058724 | Jun 2006 | DE |
1 776 999 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1 911 511 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2 034 187 | Jun 1980 | GB |
57-59625 | Apr 1982 | JP |
WO 0222247 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 2006057560 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007013415 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2008083673 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100118643 A1 | May 2010 | US |