Agricultural liquid application nozzle, system, and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6276617
  • Patent Number
    6,276,617
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 30, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 21, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A spraying nozzle, system, and associated methods for applying a liquid to foliage are provided. A container having an opening supplies liquid to be sprayed to a nozzle that includes a spray tip at an upstream end. The nozzle is made of an inert material, and a magnet is affixed adjacent the spray tip's orifice along the liquid pathway. The liquid is pumped out of the container, passing by and contacting the magnet, which affects the liquid droplets by orienting the dipoles of the molecules comprising the liquid. This serves to reduce the droplet size owing to mutual repulsion, creating a “cloud” of spray. The smaller droplets are better able to penetrate smaller spaces in the foliage such as insect habitats and difficult-to-access foliage pockets. The transient magnetization also increases the attraction of the droplets for the foliage, which thereby further increases the efficiency of spraying and coverage achieved.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to systems and methods for applying liquids to foliage and, more particularly, to such systems and methods employing liquids under pressure through a nozzle.




2. Description of Related Art




The spraying of crops and other foliage is known to be accomplished with the use of nozzles through which liquid under pressure is forced and directed to the desired target area, typically the leaves. Concentrate sprayers have difficulties owing to impingement and even distribution of spray particles throughout large target areas. Low-volume sprayers offered some promise in the reduction of the use of spray chemicals, but posed problems of drift and consequent potential contamination of crops, animals, and people. Electrostatic sprayers addressed the drift problem but have proved too complicated and impractical for grower use.




In order to optimize application efficiency, systems have been devised for sensing the location of the foliage and controlling the direction of the spray toward the sensed location. Such systems have lessened the amount of chemical required to be sprayed but still did not address the problem of drift, which can amount to 50% loss of sprayed chemical.




The charging of sprayed liquid has been disclosed by Ward (U.S. Pat. No. 3,195,264), Inculet et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,666,089 and 4,673,132), Burls et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,762,274), Lunzer (U.S. Pat. No. 5,080,289), and Wilson et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,228,621). A magnetic-field-generating nozzle for atomizing a molten metal stream into a particle spray is taught by Muench et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,925,103). The use of a permanent magnet to increase the efficiency of applying paint has been disclosed by Romanov (SU 1212-606-A). In this device the magnet is outside the spray nozzle and does not come into direct contact with the paint. Further, the sprayer components are not inert.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a spray nozzle for applying liquid to foliage.




It is an additional object to provide an agricultural spraying system incorporating such a nozzle.




It is a further object to provide a method for spraying foliage.




It is another object to provide a method of improving the efficiency of an agricultural spraying process.




It is yet an additional object to provide a nozzle for reducing the particle size of droplets emerging from a spraying apparatus.




It is yet a further object to provide a method for reducing the particle size of droplets emerging from a spraying apparatus.




It is yet another object to provide a spraying system having increased specificity for living foliage.




An additional object is to provide a method of reducing fouling of lines used to carry liquid to be sprayed.




Another object is to reduce the quantity of liquid required to achieve a desired coverage of foliage to be sprayed.




These objects and others are attained by the present invention, a spraying nozzle, system, and associated methods for applying a liquid to foliage. Throughout the word foliage is to be construed to include living plant material, including, but not limited to, leaves, stems, branches, and trunks. The system comprises a container that is adapted for holding a liquid. The container has an opening. The system also comprises a nozzle that includes a spray tip at an upstream end that has an orifice. The nozzle comprises an inert material and a magnet that is affixed adjacent the orifice along the liquid pathway.




A line having a lumen is affixable at an upstream end to the container and to the nozzle at a downstream end. The lumen is in communication with the container's opening and also with the to nozzle orifice.




Means are provided in the system for pumping liquid from the container through the line and out the nozzle orifice. The liquid, on its way out the nozzle orifice, passes by and contacts the magnet and is subject to the magnetic field, which affects the liquid droplets by orienting the dipoles of the molecules comprising the liquid, which serves to reduce the droplet size owing to mutual repulsion, creating a “cloud” of spray. The smaller droplets are better able to penetrate smaller spaces in the foliage such as insect habitats and difficult-to-access foliage pockets. The temporary magnetization also increases the attraction of the droplets for the foliage, which thereby further increases the efficiency of spraying and coverage achieved.




The features that characterize the invention, both as to organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages thereof, will be better understood from the following description used in conjunction with the accompanying drawing. It is to be expressly understood that the drawing is for the purpose of illustration and description and is not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. These and other objects attained, and advantages offered, by the present invention will become more fully apparent as the description that now follows is read in conjunction with the accompanying drawing.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic diagram of the agricultural spraying system of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is an exploded view of a first embodiment of the spray nozzle.





FIG. 3

is an exploded view of a second embodiment of the spray nozzle.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




A description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be presented with reference to

FIGS. 1-3

.




The agricultural spraying system


10


of the present invention in a preferred embodiment includes a vehicle


90


that is drivable adjacent rows of crops


91


, typically along pathways


92


between rows of crops such as trees


93


. This is not intended as a limitation, however, as individual plants, trees, or bushes can also be sprayed with the system


10


. Means


94


for sensing a location of foliage such as is known in the art may also be positioned on the vehicle


90


. Such means


94


may also be adapted to control the spraying nozzles to be described herein for preferentially spraying the sensed location of the crops


91


desired to be sprayed.




The vehicle


90


has removably affixed thereto a container


12


for holding the liquid


14


to be sprayed, which may comprise, for example, a biocide or a fertilizer. Preferably the container


12


comprises a magnetically inert material such as a plastic, and may contain means for agitating or stirring the container's contents, which may be desirable if, for example, the contents do not readily stay in solution.




The container


12


has an opening


16


into which is coupled a first line


18


leading to a pump


19


, which is mounted on the vehicle


90


. From the pump


19


lead a plurality of lines


20


for distributing liquid


14


to a plurality of nozzles


22


(


52


in a second embodiment, FIG.


3


), across which air is directed between vanes


23


by at least ore fan (not shown) for atomizing the liquid


14


. Fans such as are known in the art may be employed as desirable for a particular crop, such as fans ranging from 24 to 48 inches. It is preferred to provide entrained turbulent air at 100+ mph, although this is not intended as a limitation.




Each nozzle


22


,


52


in a first (

FIG. 2

) and a second embodiment (FIG.


3


), respectively, comprises a nozzle body


26


,


56


that has a coupler for coupling to a line


20


such as is well known in the art at an upstream end


27


,


57


and a lumen


28


,


58


. The upstream end exterior surface


29


,


59


may comprise, for example, a hex face. At the downstream end


30


,


60


are an external, male threaded portion


31


,


61


and an internal, female threaded portion


32


,


62


.




Threadable into the internal threaded portion


32


,


62


of the nozzle body


26


,


56


is a generally cylindrical strainer


33


,


63


having a lumen


34


,


64


that contains a filter such as a 100-mesh filter (not shown) for filtering liquid passing through the lumen


34


,


64


. The lumen


34


,


64


, when the strainer


33


,


63


is screwed into the nozzle body


26


,


56


, is in communication with the nozzle body's lumen


28


,


58


. The strainer


33


,


63


also has a head


35


,


65


at the downstream end.




A spray tip


36


,


66


is positionable with the strainer head


35


,


65


at an upstream end, and has a lumen


38


,


68


in communication with the strainer's lumen


34


,


64


leading to an orifice


39


,


69


configured to disperse liquid passing therethrough. The first embodiment of the spray tip


36


comprises a slotted member for producing a generally planar spray, while the second embodiment of the spray tip


66


includes a generally toroidal core


361


positionable in abutting relation to the strainer head


65


, followed downstream by a disc


362


positionable downstream of the core


361


. The lumina


363


,


68


of these members, respectively, are configured for producing a desired spray pattern, such as is offered by Precision Lumark Nozzles (Precision Fitting and Valve Co., Inc., Farmington, Minn.). Many such nozzles are known in the art, however, and these are not intended as limitations on the present invention.




A cap


40


,


70


anchors the spray tip


36


,


66


and strainer


33


,


63


in engagement with the nozzle body


26


,


56


and has a lumen


41


,


71


in communication with the spray tip's orifice


39


,


69


. The lumen's inner surface comprises a female threaded portion


42


,


72


for engaging the nozzle body's male threaded portion


31


,


61


. This portion of the lumen


41


,


71


is sufficiently large to encompass the strainer


33


,


63


and spray tip


36


,


66


and other intervening elements, and thus hold them in place when the threaded portions


42


,


72


;


31


,


61


are engaged.




Preferably the nozzle body


26


,


56


, strainer


33


,


63


, spray tip


36


,


66


, and cap


40


,


70


comprise an inert material, such as a ceramic, carbide, or polyglass, although these materials are not intended as limitations.




The nozzle


22


,


52


additionally comprises a magnet positionable adjacent the spray tip


36


,


66


. In the first embodiment


22


a plurality of bar magnets


43


are positionable in abutting relation to and within the strainer


33


. The bar magnets


43


each has a positive/negative axis, and the negative pole


44


faces in a common direction for all bar magnets


43


, preferably toward the spray tip's orifice


39


.




In the second embodiment


52


a toroidal magnet


73


is placed between the core


361


and the disc


362


, with the negative face


74


toward the spray tip's orifice


69


. Alternatively, the toroidal magnet may have an outer diameter dimensioned for placement within the strainer


63


upstream of the head


65


. The toroidal magnet


73


may also comprise a plurality of toroidal magnets


73


,


73


′,


73


″ stacked so that their polarities are aligned in a common direction. An exemplary toroidal magnet


73


comprises a neodymium ring (The Magnet Source, Miami, Fla.), such as a ⅜-in. “donut” magnet, although this is not intended as a limitation.




In addition to placing a magnet or plurality of magnets adjacent the nozzle, magnets


43


,


73


may also be placed in the lumen of the line(s)


20


, in the liquid container


12


upstream of the line(s)


20


, and/or also on the spray vanes. In any placement, however, it is preferred that the magnets are in direct contact with the liquid pathway.




Test Results




A controlled test was performed by the University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences at a fernery in Volusia County, Fla. As is shown in Table 1, which is a compilation of experiments undertaken over a six-week period, the percent of leaves infected has been reduced (29%) with the use of the system and method of the present invention. Even more dramatic is the reduction in average percent of leaf area damaged (73%).












TABLE 1











Data from Controlled Experiment on Results






of Spraying a Crop of Ferns with the System of the Present Invention

















Leaf area






Land area




Leaves sampled




Leaves infected (%)




damaged (%)

















Control




115




23.48




1.43






Expt.




167




24.55




0.75






Control




107




13.0




1.58






Expt.




123




16.9




0.66






Control




107




14.0




0.96






Expt.




128




7.03




0.17






Control




135




14.81




0.21






Expt.




129




14.73




0.46






Control




136




24.3




2.89






Expt.




127




11.02




0.31






Control




134




36.57




6.77






Expt.




129




15.50




1.35






Control (avg.)





21.03




2.31






Expt. (avg.)





14.96




0.62






Avg. dif. (%)





−29%




−73%














Table 2 shows results using the present invention as compared with other published data.












TABLE 2









Published Data on Agricultural Coverage






with Conventional Air Blast Sprayer vs. Present Invention
























Trees, 35′ high


a









Helicopter






FMC PTO




57%






FMC Engine




92%






Magnetic




93%






Ratio spray coverage, top to bottom of trees






Conventional air blast sprayer


b






51%






Magnetic




97%






Variation of control of fungi on avocadoes w. copper






Conventional


c






50%






Magnetic






Effect of growth regulators (Giberilum) - % increase over






control






Conventional


d






65%






Magnetic




130%






Percentage of droplet according to size found in insect






microhabitat


e








100 μm




0%






 50 μm




99%






 30 μm




98%






Savings on chemical over conventional sprayer




50-75%






Coverage efficiency






Conventional sprayer




44%






Magnetic




96%













a


University of California, Haire.












b


Guelph University, Frank.












c


University of Florida, McMillan.












d


FMC, Lane.












e


Michigan State University, Ayers.













It is believed that the transiently magnetized particles are attracted to the living portions of the plants toward which they are aimed, including the leaves, stems, and trunks. It is preferable to tailor the force field of the spray particles to the intended target, with 30 μm believed best for reaching microhabitats of insects.




Tests have been performed with the use of fluorescent dye incorporated in the sprayed liquid to determine coverage and drift. These tests resulted in a finding that 98% of the magnetized spray reaches and adheres to foliage surfaces, on both top and bottom surfaces thereof. A wind of 12 mph did not substantially affect spray drift. No spray was found on the ground, and the 2% not found on the target foliage could not be accounted for.




From the data collected in the tables it may be seen that the magnetic system and methods of the present invention confer a number of advantages that are economically and environmentally beneficial: coverage is increased, enabling a reduction in amount of chemical used; penetration into insect microhabitats is increased owing to a decrease in droplet size emitted by the magnetic sprayer; growth improvement is enhanced owing to increased coverage and penetration; sprayed substances are found primarily on foliage and not on the ground, as indicated by inclusion of fluorescent dye in the sprayed liquid.




In summary, then, the tests have proved that the magnetic spray is advantageous over conventional spraying apparatus owing to only 2% drift, 98% coverage, and 75% reduced chemical, resulting in better control of pests. Also, fewer spray applications are required, as field tests showed that the interval between spray applications can be increased without lessening the quality of the crop. Such an interval can be up to three times as long as typically used.




It may be appreciated by one skilled in the art that additional embodiments may be contemplated, including other orientations of a magnet or plurality of magnets on the nozzle or along other portions of the line.




In the foregoing description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clarity, and understanding, but no unnecessary limitations are to be implied therefrom beyond the requirements of the prior art, because such words are used for description purposes herein and are intended to be broadly construed. Moreover, the embodiments of the apparatus illustrated and described herein are by way of example, and the scope of the invention is not limited to the exact details of construction.




Having now described the invention, the construction, the operation and use of preferred embodiment thereof, and the advantageous new and useful results obtained thereby, the new and useful constructions, and reasonable mechanical equivalents thereof obvious to those skilled in the art, are set forth in the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A nozzle for applying liquid under pressure to foliage comprising:a nozzle body having means for coupling to a line at an upstream end and a lumen; a spray tip at a downstream end having an orifice; means for mating the nozzle body with the spray tip, the mating means comprising a strainer comprising a generally cylindrical portion having a strainer lumen in communication with the nozzle body lumen and the spray tip orifice and the strainer further comprising means for filtering liquid passing through the strainer lumen; and a magnet positionable adjacent the spray tip along a liquid pathway comprising a toroidal element dimensioned to fit within the strainer lumen; wherein the spray tip, the coupling means, and the nozzle body comprise a substantially inert material.
  • 2. The nozzle recited in claim 1, wherein the magnet comprises a plurality of toroidal elements, each having a negative face and a positive face, the hole extending therebetween, the negative faces all facing in a common direction.
  • 3. The nozzle recited in claim 1, further comprising a cap having means for anchoring the spray tip and strainer in engagement with the nozzle body and further having a lumen in communication with the spray tip orifice.
  • 4. The nozzle recited in claim 1, wherein the magnet comprises a generally toroidal element positionable between a downstream end of the strainer and an upstream end of the spray tip, the toroidal element having a hole therethrough in communication with the strainer lumen and the spray tip orifice.
  • 5. A nozzle for applying liquid under pressure to foliage comprising:a nozzle body having means for coupling to a line at an upstream end and a lumen; a spray tip at a downstream end having an orifice; means for mating the nozzle body with the spray tip, the mating means having a lumen and comprising a strainer having means for filtering liquid passing through the mating means lumen, the strainer further having a strainer lumen in communication with the nozzle body lumen and the spray tip orifice; and a plurality of bar magnets positionable adjacent the spray tip along a liquid pathway, each positionable within the strainer, the bar magnets each having a positive/negative axis, a negative pole facing in a common direction for all bar magnets. wherein the spray tip, the coupling means, and the nozzle body comprise a substantially inert material.
  • 6. A system for spraying foliage comprising:a container for holding liquid and having an opening; a nozzle comprising a spray tip at an upstream end and having an orifice and comprising an inert material and a magnet affixed adjacent the orifice along a liquid pathway; an additional magnet positionable adjacent the container opening; a line having a lumen and affixable at an upstream end to the container and affixable to the nozzle at a downstream end, the lumen in communication with the container opening and with the nozzle orifice; and means for pumping liquid from the container through the line and out the nozzle orifice.
  • 7. The system recited in claim 6, wherein the line comprises an inert material.
  • 8. A system for spraying foliage comprising:a container for holding liquid and having an opening; a nozzle comprising a spray tip at an upstream end and having an orifice and comprising an inert material and a magnet affixed adjacent the orifice along a liquid pathway; an additional magnet positionable within the line; a line having a lumen and affixable at an upstream end to the container and affixable to the nozzle at a downstream end, the lumen in communication with the container opening and with the nozzle orifice; and means for pumping liquid from the container through the line and out the nozzle orifice.
US Referenced Citations (12)
Number Name Date Kind
3195264 Ward, Jr. Jul 1965
4666089 Inculet May 1987
4673132 Inculet et al. Jun 1987
4762274 Burls et al. Aug 1988
4925103 Muench et al. May 1990
5052628 Wainwright et al. Oct 1991
5080289 Lunzer Jan 1992
5222324 O'Neall et al. Jun 1993
5228621 Wilson et al. Jul 1993
5585626 Beck et al. Dec 1996
5793035 Beck et al. Aug 1998
5833144 Kinter Nov 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
1212606 A Feb 1986 SU