This application is U.S. National Phase Application of and claims the benefit of priority to International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/024281, filed on Feb. 1, 2013, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Prior to connecting a well to a production pipeline, a well test is performed where the well is produced and the production evaluated. The product collected from the well (e.g., crude oil and gas) must be disposed of. In certain instances, the product is separated and a portion of the product (e.g., substantially crude) is disposed of by burning using a surface well test burner system. For example, on an offshore drilling platform, the well test burner system is often mounted at the end of a boom that extends outward from the side of the platform. As the well is tested, the crude is piped out the boom to the well test burner system and burned. Well test burner systems are also sometimes used on land-based wells.
The burning well product produces a large amount of heat. Therefore, well test burner systems typically have heat shields to reduce the amount of heat radiated back to the platform. The effectiveness of the heat shields depends on the shielding being between the flame of the burning well product and the platform. As wind shifts, it effects the direction of the flame and can blow the flame away from the heat shields, and in certain instances, back towards the platform. Thus, in setting up a well test burner system, the well test burner system is oriented to account for the wind direction.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
The well test burner system 10 includes a frame 12 that carries the other components of the well test burner system 10 and is adapted to be mounted to a boom or a skid. The frame 12 is shown as being tubular and defining a substantially cubic rectangular shape, but could be other configurations.
The frame 12 carries one or more burner nozzles 14 adapted to receive air and well product, combine the air and well product, and expel an air/well product mixture for burning through an outlet. The burner nozzles 14 are carried on a common air inlet pipe 18 attached to the frame 12. The air inlet pipe 18 extends horizontally from the back to the front of the well test burner system 10, and then turns vertical along vertical axis A-A. In the vicinity of the burner nozzles, the inlet pipe 18 is straight and vertical. Each of the burner nozzles 14 has an air inlet 36 (
The vertical portion of the air inlet pipe 18 includes a swivel joint 26 and the vertical portion of the well product inlet pipe 16 (below any split) includes a swivel joint 28. The swivel joints 26, 28 allow the vertical portion of the pipes 16, 18 (including any split portion of the pipes) to swivel or pivot about the vertical axis A-A. As the burner nozzles 14 are carried on the air inlet pipe 18, swiveling the pipes 16, 18 also changes the orientation of the burner nozzles 14 in unison relative to the frame 12 and the platform. The burner nozzles 14 swivel in unison. The swivel joints 26, 28 are of a type that include a seal that maintains a seal against leakage of the air or well product from the interior of the pipes 16, 18 to the exterior surroundings while swiveling. Such swivel joints 26, 28 enable the orientation of the burner nozzles 14 to be changed while the burner nozzles 14 are receiving air and well product and outputting the air/well product mixture. In certain instances, the swivel joints 26, 28 can include a bearing system (e.g., ball bearings) to facilitate swiveling the joint while under pressure of the air and well product supply.
As shown in the figures, the burner nozzles 14 can be arranged in a precise vertical column, within a reasonable manufacturing tolerance, with the outlet of each on a common precise vertical line. In other instances, the arrangement can be not precisely vertical, for example, with the column being tilted yet more vertical than horizontal and/or the outlets of some or all of the nozzles 14 not precisely on the same line. The vertical column arrangement, whether precise or not, is adapted to facilitate vertical cross-lighting between adjacent burner nozzles 14 in that the nozzles 14 are positioned so the flame produced by a lower burner nozzle 14 tends to travel upward and light or maintain lit at least the immediately adjacent, higher burner nozzle 14.
The flat flame produced by the burner nozzles 14 arranged in a column has a smaller surface area visible to the platform than a shape that projects more laterally. Therefore, the flat flame radiates less heat toward the boom and other components of the platform. The frame 12 further carries one or more heat shields to reduce transmission of heat from the burning product to components of the burner system 10, as well as to the boom and other components of the platform. In certain instances, a primary heat shield 26 is mounted together with the burner nozzles 14 and spans substantially the entire front of the frame 12. The heat shield 26, thus, swivels or pivots with the burner nozzles 14. In a configuration where the frame 12 is a cubic rectangular shape, the larger dimension of the rectangle can be aligned with the height of the flat flame. The resulting primary heat shield 26 can then block a larger portion of the radiative heat emitted from the flat flame toward the platform. The frame 12 can also include one or more secondary heat shields to further protect other components of the burner system 10. For example, a secondary heat shield 38 is shown surrounding a control box of the burner system 10. Fewer or more heat shields can be provided.
The frame 12 carries one or more pilot burners 24 that are coupled to receive a supply of pilot gas. Specifically, the pilot burners 24 are mounted to the air inlet pipe 18 to swivel with the pipe 18 and the burner nozzles 14. The pilot burners 24 burn the pilot gas to maintain a pilot flame that lights the air/product mixture expelled from burner nozzles 14. In certain instances, the pilot gas is not a gas collected from the well, but rather a separate supply of clean gas. Two pilot burners 24 are shown flanking the columns of burner nozzles 14. Each pilot burner 24 is positioned vertically between the vertically lowest burner nozzle 14 and an adjacent burner nozzle 14. In the configuration of
In certain instances, the well test burner system 10 can be provided with a linear actuator 34 that can swivel the burner nozzles 14 in response to a remote signal. The linear actuator 34, for example, can be controlled by and receive signals from a central control room on the platform and/or another controller apart from the well test burner system 10. The linear actuator 34 is attached between a leg 32 of the frame 12 and a moment arm 30 affixed to the vertical portion of the well product inlet pipe 16 above the swivel 28. When the linear actuator extends beyond a mid-extension, it swivels the burner nozzles 14 toward one side (
In operation, the burner nozzles 14 of the well test burner system 10 are swiveled to a specified initial orientation based, in part, on the wind direction, and the well test burner system 10 is started and subsequently operated to burn well product. If the wind direction changes, the burner nozzles 14 can be swiveled to a new specified orientation to account for the change in wind direction, for example, to reduce the amount the flame visible and radiating back to the platform. The burner nozzles 14 can be swiveled to the new specified orientation without interrupting the output of air/well product mixture, and thus without extinguishing the flame. In an instance having a linear actuator 34, the actuator can be signaled to swivel the burner nozzles 14 to the new specified orientation. The ability to re-orient the burner nozzles 14 while continuing to burn the well product saves time in shutdown and restart of the well test burner system when the wind changes. This also allows such quick response to wind adjustments that heat can be quickly mitigated if the wind direction causes it to increase.
A number of embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/024281 | 2/1/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/120237 | 8/7/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3185202 | Mitchell et al. | May 1965 | A |
3565562 | Drivet | Feb 1971 | A |
3894831 | Glotin | Jul 1975 | A |
3980416 | Goncalves | Sep 1976 | A |
4011995 | Krause, Jr. | Mar 1977 | A |
4270561 | Bjorklund | Jun 1981 | A |
4348171 | Issenmann | Sep 1982 | A |
4412811 | Pedrosa, Jr. | Nov 1983 | A |
4655706 | Bayh, III | Apr 1987 | A |
5044558 | Young et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5058808 | Young | Oct 1991 | A |
5096124 | Young | Mar 1992 | A |
5360334 | Kagi, Sr. | Nov 1994 | A |
5464344 | Hufton | Nov 1995 | A |
5636980 | Young | Jun 1997 | A |
5918670 | Coutts et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5993196 | Young et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6027332 | Glotin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036479 | Dubach et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
7566217 | Morsner | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20060127831 | Kagi, Sr. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070248920 | Morsner | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20100209862 | Hahn | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110226218 | Vongsateanchai | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130000693 | Waterhouse | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0454351 | Apr 1991 | EP |
04-225705 | Aug 1992 | JP |
11022915 | Jan 1999 | JP |
WO94-08178 | Apr 1994 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2013/024281, dated Aug. 13, 2015, 10 pages. |
“The Derwent Environmental Crude Oil Burner,” DPIR Ltd., Nicosia, Cyrpus, Jul. 2011, 3 pages. |
“Sea Emerald Burner System,” EXPRO, Jun. 2011, 2 pages. |
“EverGreen Burner Fallout-free and smokeless liquid hydrocarbon combustion,” Schlumberger, Apr. 2011, 2 pages. |
“Peacock Oil Burner,” Flare Industries, Inc., Apr. 2009, 2 pages. |
“Flare Systems,” John Zink Company LLC, 2001, 3 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2013/024281, dated Oct. 22, 2013, 14 pages. |
Cody et al., “Vertically Arranged Well Test Burner System”, PCT/US2013/024266, Feb. 1, 2013, 12 pages. |
Cody et al., “Signal Responsive Well Test Burner”, PCT/US2013/024275, Feb. 1, 2013, 15 pages. |
Cody, “Variable Air to Product Ratio Well Burner Nozzle”, PCT/US2013/024264, Feb. 1, 2013, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150354814 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |