This application relates to a seal shaft for supporting a seal in an air cycle machine and wherein the seal shaft is designed to eliminate variation in distance between seal shaft faces.
Air cycle machines are known and are often utilized in aircraft air supply systems, such as conditioning air for use in an aircraft cabin.
In an air cycle machine, a pair of turbine rotors are driven by pressurized air to, in turn, drive a shaft which drives a compressor and a fan. Air compressed by the compressor and moved by the fan is utilized for various operations on an associated aircraft.
In one type of air cycle machine, a first stage turbine rotor is positioned axially adjacent the compressor rotor. A disk shaped seal is fixed in the housing between the two rotors. A seal shaft rotates with the main shaft and radially inward of this disk seal. In the prior art, the seal shaft has sometimes had variation along axial edges. Even a small variation in the position of the edges on the seal shaft can result in a kinking between the two rotors. That is, if the seal shaft edges are not as desired, there may be a variation in the center of gravity of the rotors creating an imbalance, which can cause vibration.
A seal shaft for use in an air cycle machine has two axial edges. An axial distance is measured between contact faces at the axial edges, with a tolerance to the dimension. A greatest variation between the axial distance at a plurality of spaced locations on the edge faces is maintained with a ratio of the greatest variation to the tolerance being less than 0.2. A rotor assembly, an air cycle machine and a method are also disclosed.
These and other features may be best understood from the following drawings and specification.
An air cycle machine 20 is illustrated in
A disk seal 40 has seal faces 90 and 92 between the rotors 28 and 32, respectively. The disk seal 40 is supported on a seal shaft 42. The seal shaft 42 has axial edges 44 and 46, which are positioned between structure on an associated shaft portion 99. Seal shaft 42 rotates with rotors 28 and 32. The seal shaft 42 may be press-fit on the rotors 28 and 32.
As mentioned above, the seal shaft 42 must be precisely placed and supported, otherwise, there may be variation in the location of the disk seal 40 relative to one of the rotors 28 and 32.
The seal shaft 42 is better illustrated in
A distance d1 can be defined between the contact faces 100 and 102 along an axial center line X. In one embodiment, d1 was 0.770 inch (1.955 cm) plus or minus 0.002 inch (0.005 cm).
As is illustrated, there are a number of radially spaced locations on the contact faces 100 and 102 shown as A, B and C.
Applicant's current disclosure ensures that a difference between the distance d1 measured at A, B and C (and the other infinite distances) will be kept to less than 0.0003 inch. Stated another way, the variation allowed between the distances d1 at the distinct radial locations is kept relatively small and such that a ratio of the greatest variation between the distances A, B and C to the absolute value of the tolerance (here 0.002) is less than 0.2, preferably less than 0.175, and most desirably 0.15.
For purposes of defining the contact faces 100 and 102, chamfers 201 formed between a bore 111 and contact faces 100 and 102 are not part of the contact faces 100 and 102.
The variation may be measured utilizing known techniques.
As shown schematically in
A method as disclosed includes the steps of removing a seal shaft from a housing from a location intermediate a turbine rotor 28 and a compressor rotor 32. The removed seal shaft is replaced by a seal shaft 42 as disclosed above.
The method as mentioned above is somewhat simplified. In fact, to replace the seal shaft, the air cycle machine 20 generally has to be removed, including disassembling housings and the rotors. To remove the existing seal shaft, the press-fit would have to be broken. A new press-fit with a replacement seal shaft 42 may be achieved by cooling the rotors 28 and 32 in liquid nitrogen, prior to mating with the new seal shaft 42.
Although an embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3286335 | Di Pietra | Nov 1966 | A |
4625977 | Azibert | Dec 1986 | A |
5784894 | Army, Jr. et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5921683 | Merritt | Jul 1999 | A |
6058715 | Strang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6427471 | Ando et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6899520 | Habedank et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6957543 | Reznik | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7151909 | Nishi et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7779644 | Decrisantis et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8272139 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8333549 | Nims | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8347647 | McAuliffe et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20120156031 | Rosen et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140210167 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |