Patent Grant
10786774
The present invention relates to an air filtration media pack that can be used to form filter elements for cleaning air. The invention additionally relates to filter elements, air filtration media, and methods for manufacturing and using.
Fluid streams, such as air and liquid, carry contaminant material therein. In many instances, it is desired to filter some or all of the contaminant materials from the fluid stream. For example, air flow streams to engines for motorized vehicles or for power generation equipment, gas streams to gas turbine systems and air streams to various combustion furnaces, carry particulate contaminants therein that should be filtered. Also liquid streams in engine lube systems, hydraulic systems, coolant systems or fuel systems, can carry contaminants that should be filtered. It is preferred for such systems, that selected contaminant material be removed from (or have its level reduced in) the fluid. A variety of fluid filter (air or liquid filter) arrangements have been developed for contaminant reduction. In general, however, continued improvements are sought.
Z-media generally refers to a type of fluted filtering media where a fluid enters flutes on a first face of the media and exits from flutes at a second face of the media. In general, the faces on z-media are provided on opposite ends of the media. The fluid enters through open flutes on one face and exits through open flutes on the other face. At some point between the first face and the second face, the fluid passes from one flute to another flute to provide for filtration.
Early forms of z-media were often referred to as corrugated media because the characterization of the media was adopted from the corrugated box board industry. Corrugated box boards, however, were generally designed for carrying a load. Accordingly, flute designs can be modified away from the standards and sizes from the corrugated box board industry to provide improved media performance.
Various disclosures have been provided for modifying the form of the flutes in z-media. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,562,825 describes corrugation patterns which utilize somewhat semicircular (in cross section) inlet flutes adjacent narrow V-shaped (with curved sides) exit flutes are shown (see FIGS. 1 and 3, of U.S. Pat. No. 5,562,825). In U.S. Pat. No. 5,049,326 to Matsumoto et al., circular (in cross-section) or tubular flutes defined by one sheet having half tubes attached to another sheet having half tubes, with flat regions between the resulting parallel, straight, flutes are shown. See FIG. 2 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,049,326. U.S. Pat. No. 4,925,561 to Ishii et al. (FIG. 1) shows flutes folded to have a rectangular cross section, in which the flutes taper along their lengths. In WO 97/40918 (FIG. 1), flutes or parallel corrugations which have a curved, wave patterns (from adjacent curved convex and concave troughs) but which taper along their lengths (and thus are not straight) are shown. Also, in WO 97/40918 flutes which have curved wave patterns, but with different sized ridges and troughs, are shown.
An air filtration media pack is provided according to the present invention. The air filtration media pack includes a plurality of layers of single facer media. A layer of single facer media comprises a fluted sheet, a facing sheet, and a plurality of flutes extending between the fluted sheet and the facing sheet and having a flute length extending from a first face of the filtration media pack to a second face of the filtration media pack. A first portion of the plurality of flutes are closed to unfiltered air flowing into the first portion of the plurality of flutes, and a second portion of the plurality of flutes are closed to unfiltered air flowing out of the second portion of the plurality of flutes so that air passing into one of the first face and the second face of the media pack and out the other of the first face and the second face of the media pack passes through media to provide filtration of the air. The fluted sheet includes repeating internal peaks facing toward the facing sheet and repeating external peaks facing away from the facing sheet. In addition, the fluted sheet includes a repeating pattern of flutes comprising a flute having at least one ridge extending along at least a portion of the flute length between an internal peak and an adjacent external peak. Preferably, the repeating pattern of flutes comprises a flute having at least one ridge extending at least 50% of the flute length between an internal peak and adjacent external peak.
The repeating patter of flutes can comprise any number of flutes where the pattern repeats itself. The number of flutes can include one flute, two flutes, three flutes, four flutes, etc. At a location within the repeating pattern, there is at least one ridge extending between an internal peak and an adjacent external peak. It is possible that there is a ridge extending between every internal peak and adjacent external peak, but that is not necessary. A repeating pattern may include flutes or portions of flutes that do not include a ridge extending between an internal peak and an adjacent external peak. In the case where the fluted sheet includes a flute having a ridge extending between an internal peak and an adjacent external peak for a flute period, that flute period can be referred to as having a “low contact” shape. When the fluted sheet includes two ridges extending between an internal peak and an adjacent external peak for a flute period, the shape of the flute period can be referred to as “zero strain.” While it is desirable to provide a ridge extending between every adjacent peak, that is not necessary. It is possible that the repeating pattern has one or more ridge extending between adjacent peaks, and one or more area between adjacent peaks that do not include a ridge.
To obtain the benefit of having a ridge extend between adjacent peaks, it can be desirable to have the ridge extend a length of at least 20% of the flute length. Preferably, the ridge extends at least 40% of the flute length, at least 50% of the flute length, or at least 80% of the flute length.
An air filtration media pack is provided according to the present invention that can be characterized as z-media containing flutes wherein the flutes contain an enhanced amount of media between adjacent flutes. Techniques for characterizing the amount of filtration media between adjacent peaks include reference to a cord-media percentage and reference to a flute width height ratio. For a filtration media pack according to the invention, the cord-media percentage can be at least about 6.2% and the flute width height ratio can be greater than about 2.2 or less than about 0.45. In addition, the filtration media pack according to the invention can be characterized as having a volume on one side of the media pack that is greater than a volume on another side of the media pack by at least 10%, and wherein the flute width height ratio can be greater than about 2.2 or less than about 0.45.
A fluted media sheet is provided according to the present invention. The fluted media sheet includes a repeating pattern of flutes comprising internal peaks and external peaks. The repeating pattern of flutes includes at least one ridge extending along at least 50% of a flute length between an internal peak and an adjacent external peak. The media comprises a cellulose based media for fluid filtration.
Methods for forming the air filtration media pack and for using the air filtration media pack are provided.
Fluted Filtration Media
Fluted filtration media can be used to provide fluid filter constructions in a variety of manners. One well known manner is as a z-filter construction. The terms “z-filter construction” or “z-filter media” as used herein, is meant to refer to a filter construction in which individual ones of corrugated, folded, pleated, or otherwise formed filter flutes are used to define longitudinal filter flutes for fluid flow through the media; the fluid flowing along the flutes between inlet and outlet flow ends (or flow faces) of the media. Some examples of z-filter media are provided in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,820,646; 5,772,883; 5,902,364; 5,792,247; 5,895,574; 6,210,469; 6,190,432; 6,350,296; 6,179,890; 6,235,195; Des. 399,944; Des. 428,128; Des. 396,098; Des. 398,046; and, Des. 437,401; each of these fifteen cited references being incorporated herein by reference.
One type of z-filter media utilizes two media components joined together to form the media construction. The two components are: (1) a fluted (for example, corrugated) media sheet; and, (2) a facing media sheet. The facing media sheet is typically non-corrugated, however it can be corrugated, for example perpendicularly to the flute direction as described in International Publication No. WO 2005/077487, published Aug. 25, 2005, incorporated herein by reference. Alternatively, the facing sheet can be a fluted (for example, corrugated) media sheet and the flutes or corrugations may be aligned with or at angles to the fluted media sheet. Although the facing media sheet can be fluted or corrugated, it can be provided in a form that is not fluted or corrugated. Such a form can include a flat sheet. When the facing media sheet is not fluted, it can be referred to as a non-fluted media sheet or as a non-fluted sheet.
The type of z-filter media that utilizes two media components joined together to form the media construction wherein the two components are a fluted media sheet and a facing media sheet can be referred to as a single facer media. In certain z-filter media arrangements, the single facer media (the fluted media sheet and the facing media sheet), together, can be used to define media having parallel inlet and outlet flutes. In some instances, the fluted sheet and non-fluted sheet are secured together and are then coiled to form a z-filter media construction. Such arrangements are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,235,195 and 6,179,890, each of which is incorporated herein by reference. In certain other arrangements, some non-coiled sections of fluted media secured to flat media, are stacked on one another, to create a filter construction. An example of this is described in FIG. 11 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,820,646, incorporated herein by reference. In general, arrangements where the z-filter media is coiled can be referred to as coiled arrangements, and arrangements where the z-filter media is stacked can be referred to as stacked arrangements. Filter elements can be provided having coiled arrangements or stacked arrangements.
Typically, coiling of the fluted sheet/facing sheet combination (e.g., the single facer media) around itself, to create a coiled media pack, is conducted with the facing sheet directed outwardly. Some techniques for coiling are described in International Publication No. WO 2004/082795, published Sep. 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference. The resulting coiled arrangement generally has, as the outer surface of the media pack, a portion of the facing sheet, as a result.
The term “corrugated” used herein to refer to structure in media, is meant to refer to a flute structure resulting from passing the media between two corrugation rollers, i.e., into a nip or bite between two rollers, each of which has surface features appropriate to cause a corrugation affect in the resulting media. The term “corrugation” is not meant to refer to flutes that are formed by techniques not involving passage of media into a bite between corrugation rollers. However, the term “corrugated” is meant to apply even if the media is further modified or deformed after corrugation, for example by the folding techniques described in PCT WO 04/007054, published Jan. 22, 2004, incorporated herein by reference.
Corrugated media is a specific form of fluted media. Fluted media is media which has individual flutes (for example, formed by corrugating or folding or pleating) extending thereacross. Fluted media can be prepared by any technique that provides the desired flute shapes. Corrugating can be a useful technique for forming flutes having a particular size. When it is desirable to increase the height of the flutes (the height is the elevation between peaks), corrugating techniques might not be practical and it may be desirable to fold or pleat the media. In general, pleating of media can be provided as a result of folding the media. An exemplary technique for folding the media to provide pleats includes scoring and using pressure to create the fold.
Filter element or filter cartridge configurations utilizing z-filter media are sometimes referred to as “straight through flow configurations” or by variants thereof. In general, in this context what is meant is that the serviceable filter elements generally have an inlet flow end (or face) and an exit flow end (or face), with flow entering and exiting the filter cartridge in generally the same straight through direction. The term “straight through flow configuration” disregards, for this definition, air flow that passes out of the media pack through the outermost wrap of facing media. In some instances, each of the inlet flow end and outlet flow end can be generally flat or planar, with the two parallel to one another. However, variations from this, for example non-planar faces, are possible in some applications. Furthermore, the characterization of an inlet flow face and an opposite exit flow face is not a requirement that the inlet flow face and the outlet flow face are parallel. The inlet flow face and the exit flow face can, if desired, be provided as parallel to each other. Alternatively, the inlet flow face and the outlet flow face can be provided at an angle relative to each other so that the faces are not parallel. In addition, non-planar faces can be considered non-parallel faces.
A straight through flow configuration is, for example, in contrast to cylindrical pleated filter cartridges of the type shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,039,778, in which the flow generally makes a substantial turn as its passes through the serviceable cartridge. That is, in a U.S. Pat. No. 6,039,778 filter, the flow enters the cylindrical filter cartridge through a cylindrical side, and then turns to exit through an end face in a forward-flow system. In a reverse-flow system, the flow enters the serviceable cylindrical cartridge through an end face and then turns to exit through a side of the cylindrical filter cartridge. An example of such a reverse-flow system is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,613,992.
The filter element or filter cartridge can be referred to as a serviceable filter element or filter cartridge. The term “serviceable” in this context is meant to refer to a media containing filter cartridge that is periodically removed and replaced from a corresponding air cleaner. An air cleaner that includes a serviceable filter element or filter cartridge is constructed to provide for the removal and replacement of the filter element or filter cartridge. In general, the air cleaner can include a housing and an access cover wherein the access cover provides for the removal of a spent filter element and the insertion of a new or cleaned (reconditioned) filter element.
The term “z-filter media construction” and variants thereof as used herein, without more, is meant to refer to any or all of: a single facer media containing a fluted media sheet and a facing media sheet with appropriate closure to inhibit air flow from one flow face to another without filtering passage through the filter media; and/or, a single facer media that is coiled or stacked or otherwise constructed or formed into a three dimensional network of flutes; and/or, a filter construction including a single facer media; and/or, a fluted media constructed or formed (e.g., by folding or pleating) into a three dimensional network of flutes. In general, it is desirable to provide an appropriate flute closure arrangement to inhibit unfiltered air that flows in one side (or face) of the media from flowing out the other side (or face) of the media as part of the filtered air stream leaving the media. In many arrangements, the z-filter media construction is configured for the formation of a network of inlet and outlet flutes, inlet flutes being open at a region adjacent an inlet face and being closed at a region adjacent an outlet face; and, outlet flutes being closed adjacent an inlet face and being open adjacent an outlet face. However, alternative z-filter media arrangements are possible, see for example US 2006/0091084 A1, published May 4, 2006 to Baldwin Filters, Inc. also comprising flutes extending between opposite flow faces, with a seal arrangement to prevent flow of unfiltered air through the media pack. In many z-filter constructions according to the invention, adhesive or sealant can be used to close the flutes and provide an appropriate seal arrangement to inhibit unfiltered air from flowing from one side of the media to the other side of the media. Plugs, folds of media, or a crushing of the media can be used as techniques to provide closure of flutes to inhibit the flow of unfiltered air from one side of the media (face) to the other side of the media (face).
An alternative z-filter construction can be provided utilizing a fluted media sheet. For example, the fluted media sheet can be folded to create closures at the inlet flow face and exit flow face. An example of this type of arrangement can be seen in, for example, U.S. 2006/0151383 to AAF-McQuay Inc. and WO 2006/13271 to Fleetguard, Inc., that describe fluted media having folds or bends perpendicular to the flute direction to seal the ends of the flutes.
Referring to
In the context of fluted filtration media, and in particular the exemplary media 1, the troughs 7b and hills 7a can be characterized as peaks. That is, the highest point of the hills 7a can be characterized as peaks and the lowest points of the troughs 7b can be characterized as peaks. The combination of the fluted sheet 3 and the facing sheet 4 can be referred to as the single facer media 5. The peaks formed at the troughs 7b can be referred to as internal peaks because they face toward the facing sheet 3 of the single facer media 5. The peaks formed at the hills 7a can be characterized as external peaks because they face away from the facing sheet 3 forming the single facer media 5. For the single facer media 5, the fluted sheet 3 includes repeating internal peaks at 7b that face toward the facing sheet 4, and repeating external peaks at hills 7a that face away from the facing sheet 4.
The term “regular” when used to characterize a flute pattern is not intended to characterize media that can be considered “tapered.” In general, a taper refers to a reduction or an increase in the size of the flute along a length of the flute. In general, filtration media that is tapered can exhibit a first set of flutes that decrease in size from a first end of the media to a second end of the media, and a second set of flutes that increase in size from the first end of the media to the second end of the media. In general, a tapered pattern is not considered a regular pattern. It should be understood, however, that z-media can contain regions that are considered regular and regions that are considered non-regular along the flute length. For example, a first set of flutes may be considered regular along a distance of the flute length, such as, one quarter the distance to three quarters the distance, and then for the remaining amount of the flute length can be considered non-regular as a result of the presence of a taper. Another possible flute configuration is to have a tapered-regular-tapered arrangement where, for example, a flute tapers from a first face to a pre-selected location, the flute then can be considered regular until a second pre-determined location, and then the flute tapers to the second face. Another alternative arrangement can be provided as a regular-taper-regular arrangement, or as a regular-taper arrangement. Various alternative arrangements can be constructed as desired.
In the context of z-media, there are generally two types of “asymmetry.” One type of asymmetry is referred to as area asymmetry, and another type of asymmetry is referred to as volume asymmetry. In general, area asymmetry refers to an asymmetry in flute cross-sectional area, and can be exhibited by tapered flutes. For example, area asymmetry exists if a fluted area at one location along the length of a flute is different from the fluted area at another location along the length of the flute. The fluted area refers to the area between the fluted sheet and the facing sheet. Because tapered flutes exhibit a decrease in size from a first location, e.g., end, to a second location (e.g., end) of the media pack or an increase in size from a first location (e.g., end) to a second location (e.g., end) of the media pack, there is an area asymmetry. This asymmetry (e.g., area asymmetry) is a type of asymmetry resulting from tapering and, as a result, media having this type of asymmetry can be referred to as non-regular. Another type of asymmetry can be referred to as volume asymmetry, and will be explained in more detail. Volumetric asymmetry refers to a difference between a dirty side volume and a clean side volume within the filter media pack. Media exhibiting volume asymmetry can be characterized as regular if the wave pattern is regular, and can be characterized as non-regular if the wave pattern is non-regular.
Z-media can be provided where at least a portion of the flutes are closed to the passage of unfiltered air by a technique other than providing a plug of adhesive or sealant. For example, the ends of flutes can be folded or crushed to provide a closure. One technique for providing a regular and consistent fold pattern for closing flutes can be referred to as darting. Darted flutes or darting generally refers to the closure of a flute wherein the closure occurs by indenting the flute and folding the flute to create a regular fold pattern to collapse the flutes toward the facing sheet to provide a closure rather than by crushing. Darting generally implies a systematic approach to closing the ends of flutes as a result of folding portions of the flute so that the flute closures are generally consistent and controlled. For example, U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2006 0163150 A1 discloses flutes having a darted configuration at the ends of the flutes. The darted configuration can provide advantages including, for example, a reduction in the amount of sealant needed to provide a seal, an increased security in the effectiveness of the seal, and a desirable flow pattern over the darted end of the flutes. Z-media can include flutes having darted ends, and the entire disclosure of U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2006 0163150 A1 is incorporated herein by reference. It should be understood that the existence of darts at the ends of flutes does not render the media non-regular.
In the context of the characterization of a “curved” wave pattern, the term “curved” is meant to refer to a pattern that is not the result of a folded or creased shape provided to the media, but rather the apex of each hill 7a and the bottom of each trough 7b is formed along a radiused curve. Although alternatives are possible, a typical radius for such z-filter media would be at least 0.25 mm and typically would be not more than 3 mm. Media that is not curved, by the above definition, can also be useable. For example, it can be desirable to provide peaks having a radius that is sufficiently sharp so that it is not considered “curved.” The radius can be less than 0.25 mm, or less than 0.20 mm. In order to reduce masking, it can be desirable to provide the peak with a knife edge. The ability to provide a knife edge at the peak can be limited by the equipment used to form the media, the media itself, and the conditions under which the media is subjected. For example, it is desirable to not cut or tear the media. Accordingly, using a knife edge to create the peak can be undesirable if the knife edge causes a cut or tear in the media. Furthermore, the media can be too light or too heavy to provide a sufficiently non-curved peak without cutting or tearing. Furthermore, the humidity of the air during processing can be enhanced to help create a tighter radius when forming the peak.
An additional characteristic of the particular regular, curved, wave pattern depicted in
A characteristic of the particular regular, curved, wave pattern corrugated sheet 3 shown in
Referring to the present
In the example shown, adjacent edge 8 is provided sealant, in this instance in the form of a sealant bead 10, sealing the fluted sheet 3 and the facing sheet 4 together. Bead 10 will sometimes be referred to as a “single facer” bead, since it is a bead between the corrugated sheet 3 and the facing sheet 4, which forms the single facer media 5. Sealant bead 10 seals closed individual flutes 11 adjacent edge 8, to passage of air therefrom.
In the example shown, at adjacent edge 9 is provided sealant, in this instance in the form of a sealant bead 14. Sealant bead 14 generally closes flutes 15 to passage of unfiltered fluid therethrough, adjacent edge 9. Bead 14 would typically be applied as the media 2 is coiled about itself, with the corrugated sheet 3 directed to the inside. Thus, bead 14 will form a seal between a back side 17 of facing sheet 4, and side 18 of the fluted sheet 3. The bead 14 will sometimes be referred to as a “winding bead” since it is typically applied, as the strip 2 is coiled into a coiled media pack. If the media 2 is cut in strips and stacked, instead of coiled, bead 14 would be a “stacking bead.”
Referring to
In more general terms, z-filter media comprises fluted filter media secured to facing filter media, and configured in a media pack of flutes extending between first and second opposite flow faces. A sealant or seal arrangement is provided within the media pack, to ensure that air entering flutes at a first upstream face cannot exit the media pack from a downstream face, without filtering passage through the media. Alternately stated, a z-filter media is closed to passage of unfiltered air therethrough, between the inlet face and the outlet flow face, typically by a sealant arrangement or other arrangement. An additional alternative characterization of this is that a first portion of the flutes are closed or sealed to prevent unfiltered air from flowing into the first portion of flutes, and a second portion of the flutes are closed or sealed to prevent unfiltered air from flowing out of the second portion of flutes so that air passing into one of the first face and the second face of the media pack and out the other of the first face and the second face of the media pack passes through media to provide filtration of the air.
For the particular arrangement shown herein in
In general, the filter media is a relatively flexible material, typically a non-woven fibrous material (of cellulose fibers, synthetic fibers or both) often including a resin therein, sometimes treated with additional materials. Thus, it can be conformed or configured into the various fluted, for example corrugated, patterns, without unacceptable media damage. Also, it can be readily coiled or otherwise configured for use, again without unacceptable media damage. Of course, it must be of a nature such that it will maintain the desired fluted (for example corrugated) configuration, during use.
In the corrugation or fluting process, an inelastic deformation is caused to the media. This prevents the media from returning to its original shape. However, once the tension is released the flutes or corrugations will tend to spring back, recovering only a portion of the stretch and bending that has occurred. The facing sheet is sometimes tacked to the fluted sheet, to inhibit this spring back in the fluted (or corrugated) sheet.
Also, typically, the media can contain a resin. During the corrugation process, the media can be heated to above the glass transition point of the resin. When the resin then cools, it will help to maintain the fluted shapes.
The media of the fluted sheet 3, facing sheet 4 or both, can be provided with a fine fiber material on one or both sides thereof, for example in accord with U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,955,775, 6,673,136, and 7,270,693, incorporated herein by reference. In general, fine fiber can be referred to as polymer fine fiber (microfiber and nanofiber) and can be provided on the media to improve filtration performance. As a result of the presence of fine fiber on the media, it may be possible or desirable to provide media having a reduced weight or thickness while obtaining desired filtration properties. Accordingly, the presence of fine fiber on media can provide enhanced filtration properties, provide for the use of lighter media, or both. Fiber characterized as fine fiber can have a diameter of about 0.001 micron to about 10 microns, about 0.005 micron to about 5 microns, or about 0.01 micron to about 0.5 micron. Nanofiber refers to a fiber having a diameter of less than 200 nanometer or 0.2 micron. Microfiber can refer to fiber having a diameter larger than 0.2 micron, but not larger than 10 microns. Exemplary materials that can be used to form the fine fibers include polyvinylidene chloride, polyvinyl alcohol polymers and co-polymers comprising various nylons such as nylon 6, nylon 4, 6, nylon 6, 6, nylon 6, 10, and co-polymers thereof, polyvinyl chloride, PVDC, polystyrene, polyacrylonitrile, PMMA, PVDF, polyamides, and mixtures thereof.
Still referring to
From the above, it will be apparent that the exemplary fluted sheet 3 depicted is typically not secured continuously to the facing sheet, along the peaks where the two adjoin. Thus, air can flow between adjacent inlet flutes, and alternately between the adjacent outlet flutes, without passage through the media. However, unfiltered air which has entered a flute through the inlet flow face cannot exit from a flute through the outlet flow face without passing through at least one sheet of media, with filtering.
Attention is now directed to
The flute height J is the distance from the flat, facing sheet 44 to the highest point of the fluted sheet 43. Alternatively stated, the flute height J is the difference in exterior elevation between alternating peaks 57 and 58 of the fluted sheet 43. The peak 57 can be referred to as the internal peak (the peak directed toward the facing sheet 44), and the peak 58 can be referred to as the external peak (the peak directed away from the facing sheet 44). Although the distances D1, D2, and J are applied to the specific fluted media arrangement shown in
Another measurement can be referred to as the cord length (CL). The cord length refers to the straight line distance from the center point 50 of the peak 57 and the center point 45 of the peak 58. The thickness of the media and the decision where to begin or end a particular distance measurement can affect the distance value if the media thickness affects the distance value. For example, the cord length (CL) can have a different value depending upon whether the distance is measured from the bottom of the internal peak to the bottom of the external peak or whether it is measured from the bottom of the internal peak to the top of the external peak. This difference in distance is an example of how the media thickness affects the distance measurement. In order to minimize the effect of the thickness of the media, the measurement for cord length is determined from a center point within the media. The relationship between the cord length CL and the media length D2 can be characterized as a media-cord percentage. The media-cord percentage can be determined according to the following formula:
In the corrugated cardboard industry, various standard flutes have been defined. These include, for example, the standard E flute, standard X flute, standard B flute, standard C flute, and standard A flute.
Donaldson Company, Inc., (DCI) the assignee of the present disclosure, has used variations of the standard A and standard B flutes, in a variety of z-filter arrangements. The DCI standard B flute can have a media-cord percentage of about 3.6%. The DCI standard A flute can have a media-cord percentage of about 6.3. Various flutes are also defined in Table 1 and
In general, standard flute configurations from the corrugated box industry have been used to define corrugation shapes or approximate corrugation shapes for corrugated media. Improved performance of filtration media can be achieved by providing a flute configuration or structure that enhances filtration. In the corrugated box board industry, the size of the flutes or the geometry of the corrugation was selected to provide a structure suited for handling a load. The flute geometry in the corrugated box industry developed the standard A flute or B flute configuration. While such flute configurations can be desirable for handling a load, filtration performance can be enhanced by altering the flute geometry. Techniques for improving filtration performance include selecting geometries and configurations that improve filtration performance in general, and that improve filtration performance under selected filtration conditions. Exemplary flute geometries and configurations that can be altered to improve filtration performance include flute masking, flute shape, flute width height ratio, and flute asymmetry. In view of the wide selection of flute geometries and configurations, the filter element can be configured with desired filter element geometries and configurations in view of the various flute geometries and configurations to improve filtration performance.
Masking
In the context of z-media, masking refers to the area of proximity between the fluted sheet and the facing sheet where there is a lack of substantial pressure difference resulting in a lack of useful filtration media when the filtration media is in use. In general, masked media is not useful for significantly enhancing the filtration performance of filtration media. Accordingly, it is desirable to reduce masking to thereby increase the amount of filtration media available for filtration and thereby increase the capacity of the filtration media, increase the throughput of the filtration media, decrease the pressure drop of the filtration media, or some or all of these.
In the case of a fluted sheet arranged in a pattern with broad radii at the peaks as shown in
Attempts have been made to reduce the radii of contact between the fluted sheet and the facing sheet. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 6,953,124 to Winter et al. An example of reducing the radii is shown in
While it is desirable to reduce the radius of the peak (internal peak or external peak) to reduce masking, it is not necessary that all of the peaks have a reduced radius to decrease masking. Depending on the design of the media, it may be sufficient to provide the external peaks with a reduced radius or to provide the internal peaks with a reduced radius, or to provide both the external peaks and the internal peaks with a reduced radius in order to decrease masking.
Increasing the Surface Area of Media
Filtration performance can be enhanced by increasing the amount of filtration media available for filtration. Reducing masking can be considered a technique for increasing the surface area of media available for filtration. Now referring to
Now referring to
The configuration of the fluted media can be characterized by the flute width height ratio. The flute width height ratio is the ratio of the flute period length D1 to the flute height J. The flute width height ratio can be expressed by the following formula:
Measured distances such as flute period length D1 and the flute height J can be characterized as average values for the filtration media along the flute length within 20% of each flute end. Accordingly, the distances can be measured away from the ends of the flutes. It is typically the ends of the flutes that have a sealant or closure. The flute width height ratio calculated at a flute closure would not necessarily represent the flute width height ratio of the flute where the filtration is taking place. Accordingly, the measure of flute width height ratio can be provided as an average value over the flute length with the exception of the last 20% of the flute length near the ends of the flutes to remove the effects of flute closure when the flutes are closed near the ends. For “regular” media, it is expected that the flute period length D1 and the flute height J will be relatively constant along the flute length. By relatively constant, it is meant that the flute width height ratio can vary within about 10% over the length of the flute excluding the 20% length at each end when flute closure designs may effect the width height ratio. In addition, in the case of a non-regular media, such as, media having tapered flutes, the flute width height ratio can vary or remain about the same over the length of the flute. By adjusting the flute shape away from a theoretical equilateral triangle shape, the amount of media available for filtration can be increased. Accordingly, flutes having a flute width height ratio of at least about 2.2, at least about 2.5, at least about 2.7, or at least about 3.0 can provide an increased surface area of media available for filtration. In addition, providing a flute design having a width height ratio of less than about 0.45, less than about 0.40, less than about 0.37, or less than about 0.33 can provide increased media area available for filtration.
Flute Shape
The performance of the filtration media can be enhanced by modifying the flute shape. Providing a flute shape that increases the amount of filtration media available for filtration can increase performance. One technique for increasing the amount of filtration media available for filtration is by creating a ridge between adjacent peaks. As discussed previously, adjacent peaks refers to an internal peak (facing toward the facing sheet) and an external peak (facing away from the facing sheet).
Now referring to
The media 110, 120, and 140 can be arranged to provide filter elements for cleaning a fluid such as air. The filter elements can be arranged as coiled elements or stacked elements. Coiled elements generally include a fluted media sheet and a facing media sheet that is wound to provide the coiled construction. The coil construction can be provided having a shape that is characterized as round, obround, or racetrack. A stacked construction generally includes alternating layers of media comprising fluted media sheet adhered to facing media sheet. The media 110, 120, and 140 shown in
In
For the exemplary fluted sheet 112, the relatively flatter portion of the fluted media 118a can be seen in
The ridge 118 can be provided as a result of coining, creasing, bending, or folding along a length of the fluted sheet 112 during the formation of the fluted media 12. It may be desirable, but it is not necessary, during the step of forming the fluted media 112 to take the steps to set the ridge 118. For example, the ridge 118 can be set by heat treatment or moisture treatment or a combination thereof. In addition, the ridge 118 can exist as a result of coining, creasing, bending, or folding to form the ridge without an additional step of setting the ridge. Furthermore, the characterization of a ridge 118 is not to be confused with the fluted sheet external peaks 115 or 119 and the fluted sheet internal peaks 116 or 114. The characterization of a generally flatter portion 118a and a generally steeper portion 118b is intended as a way to characterize the presence of a ridge. In general, it is expected that the flatter portion 118a and the steeper portion 118b will exhibit a curve. That is, it is expected that the flatter portion 118a and the steeper portion 118b will not be completely planar, particularly as fluids such as air flows through the media during filtration. Nevertheless, the angle of the media can be measured from the ridge to the corresponding, adjacent peak to provide the average angle of that portion of the media.
The shape of the media depicted in
The presence of a ridge 118 can be detected by visual observation.
Now referring to
The characterization of the presence of a ridge should be understood to mean that the ridge is present along a length of the flute. In general, the ridge can be provided along the flute for a length sufficient to provide the resulting media with the desired performance. While the ridge may extend the entire length of the flute, it is possible that the ridge will not extend the entire length of the flute as a result of, for example, influences at the ends of the flute. Exemplary influences include flute closure (e.g., darting) and the presence of plugs at the ends of flutes. Preferably, the ridge extends at least 20% of the flute length. By way of example, the ridge can extend at least 30% of the flute length, at least 40% of the flute length, at least 50% of the flute length, at least 60% of the flute length, or at least 80% of the flute length. The ends of the flutes may be closed in some manner and that as a result of the closure, one may or may not be able to detect the presence of a ridge when viewing the media pack from a face. Accordingly, the characterization of the presence of a ridge as extending along a length of the flute does not mean that the ridge must extend along the entire length of the flute. Furthermore, the ridge may not be detected at the ends of the flute. Attention is directed to the photograph of
Now referring to
The ridge 128 can be characterized as the area where a relatively flatter portion of the fluted media 128a joins a relatively steeper portion of the fluted media 128b. In general, the relatively flatter portion of the fluted media 128a can be characterized as having an angle of less than 45° and preferably less than about 30° wherein the angle is measured for the media between the ridge 128 and the ridge 129 and relative to the facing sheet 123. The relatively steeper portion of the fluted media 128b can be characterized as having an angle of greater than 45° and preferably greater than about 60° wherein the angle is measured for the media from the peak 126 to the ridge 128 and relative to the facing sheet 123. The ridge 129 can be provided as a result of the intersection of the relatively flatter portion of the fluted media 129a and the relatively steeper portion of the fluted media 129b. In general, the relatively flatter portion of the fluted media 129a corresponds to the angle of the portion of the media extending from the ridge 128 to the ridge 129 and relative to the facing sheet 123. In general, the relatively flatter portion of the fluted media 129a can be characterized as having a slope of less than 45°, and preferably less than about 30°. The relatively steeper portion of the fluted media 129b can be characterized as that portion of the fluted media extending between the ridge 129 and the peak 125 and can be characterized as having an angle measure for the media between the ridge 129 and the peak 125 and relative to the facing sheet 123. In general, the relatively steeper portion of the fluted media 129b can be characterized as having an angle of greater than 45° and preferably greater than about 60°.
Now referring to
The ridges 148 and 149 can be characterized as the areas where a relatively flatter portion of the fluted sheet joins a relatively steeper portion of the fluted sheet. In the case of the ridge 148, a relatively flatter portion of the fluted sheet 148a joins a relatively steeper portion of the fluted sheet 148b. In the case of the ridge 149, a relatively flatter portion of the fluted sheet 149a joins a relatively steeper portion of the fluted sheet 149b. The relatively steeper portion of the fluted media can be characterized as having an angle of greater than 45° and preferably greater than about 60° when measured for that portion of the media relative to the facing sheet 143. The relatively flatter portion can be characterized as having a slope of less than 45° and preferably less than about 30° for that portion of the media relative to the facing sheet 143.
The fluted sheet 142 can be considered more advantageous to prepare relative to the fluted sheet 122 because the wrap angle of the fluted sheet 142 can be less than the wrap angle for the fluted sheet 122. In general, the wrap angle refers to the sum of angles resulting in media turns during the step of fluting. In the case of the fluted media 142, the media is turned less during fluting compared with the fluted media 122. As a result, by fluting to form the fluted sheet 142, the required tensile strength of the media is lower compared with the fluted sheet 122.
The fluted sheets 112, 122, and 142 are shown as relatively symmetrical from peak to peak. That is, for the fluted sheets 112, 122, and 142, the flutes repeat having the same number of ridges between adjacent peaks. Adjacent peaks refer to the peaks next to each other along a length of fluted media. For example, for the fluted sheet 112, peaks 114 and 115 are considered adjacent peaks. A period of media, however, need not have the same number of ridges between adjacent peaks, and the media can be characterized as asymmetrical in this manner. That is, the media can be prepared having a ridge on one half of the period and not having a ridge on the other half of the period.
By providing a single ridge or multiple ridges between adjacent peaks of the fluted media, the distance D2 can be increased relative to prior art media such as standard A and B flutes. As a result of the presence of a ridge or a plurality of ridges, it is possible to provide filtration media having more media available for filtration compared with, for example, standard A flutes and B flutes. The previously described measurement of media-cord percentage can be used to characterize the amount of media provided between adjacent peaks. The length D2 is defined as the length of the fluted sheet 112, 122, and 142 for a period of the fluted sheet 112, 122, and 142. In the case of the fluted sheet 112, the distance D2 is the length of the fluted sheet from the lower peak 114 to the lower peak 116. This distance includes two ridges 118. In the case of the fluted sheet 122, the length D2 is the distance of the fluted sheet 122 from the lower peak 124 to the lower peak 126. This distance includes at least four ridges 128 and 129. The existence of increased filtration media between adjacent peaks as a result of providing one or more ridge (or crease) between the adjacent peaks can be characterized by the media-cord percentage. As discussed previously, standard B flutes and standard A flutes have a media-cord percentage of about 3.6% and about 6.3%, respectively. In general, low contact flutes such as the flute design shown in
The filtration media 120 and 140 in
An advantage of using the filtration media 120 where the fluted sheet 122 contains ridges 128 and ridges 129 is the ability to taper the flutes without creating excessive strain, and the ability to use filtration media that need not exhibit a strain greater than 12%. In general, strain can be characterized by the following equation:
D2 min refers to the media distance where the media is relaxed or without strain, and D2 max refers to the media distance under strain at a point prior to tear. Filtration media that can withstand a strain of up to about 12% is fairly commonly used in the filtration industry. Commonly used filtration media can be characterized as cellulosic based. In order to increase the strain that the media can withstand, synthetic fibers can be added to the media. As a result, it can be fairly expensive to use media that must withstand a strain greater than 12%. Accordingly, it is desirable to utilize a flute configuration that provides for tapering of the flute while minimizing the strain on the media, and avoiding the necessity of using expensive media that can tolerate higher strains than 12%.
Now referring to
The flute shapes exemplified in
The single facer media configurations shown in
Flute Volume Asymmetry
Flute volume asymmetry refers to a volumetric difference within a filter element or filter cartridge between the upstream volume and the downstream volume. The upstream volume refers to the volume of the media that receives the unfiltered air, and the downstream volume refers to the volume of the media that receives the filtered air. Filter elements can additionally be characterized as having a dirty air side and a clean air side. In general, the dirty air side of filtration media refers to the volume of media that receives the unfiltered air. The clean air side refers to the volume of media that receives the filtered air that has passed via filtering passage from the dirty air side. It can be desirable to provide a media having a dirty air side or upstream volume that is greater than the clean air side or downstream volume. It has been observed that particulates in the air are deposited on the dirty air side and, as a result, the capacity of the filtration media can be determined by the volume of the dirty air side. By providing volume asymmetry, it is possible to increase the volume of the media available for receiving the dirty air side and thereby increase the capacity of the media pack.
Filtration media having the flute volume asymmetry exists when the difference between the upstream volume and the downstream volume is greater than 10%. Flute volume asymmetry can be expressed by the following formula:
Preferably, media exhibiting volume asymmetry has volume asymmetry of greater than about 20%, and preferably about 40% to about 200%. In general, it may be desirable for the upstream volume to be greater than the downstream volume when it is desirable to maximize the life of the media. Alternatively, there may be situations where it is desirable to minimize the upstream volume relative to the downstream volume. For example, in the case of a safety element, it may be desirable to provide a safety element having a relatively low upstream volume so that the media fills and prevents flow relatively quickly as an indicator that failure has occurred in an upstream filter element.
The volume asymmetry can be calculated by measuring the cross-sectional surface area of flutes from a photograph showing a sectional view of the flutes. If the flutes form a regular pattern, this measurement will yield the flute volume asymmetry. If the flutes are not regular (e.g., tapered), then one can take several sections of the media and calculate the flute volume asymmetry using accepted interpolation or extrapolation techniques.
Flute design can be adjusted to provide a flute asymmetry that enhances filtration. In general, flute asymmetry refers to forming flutes having narrower peaks and widened arching troughs, or vice versa so that the upstream volume and downstream volume for the media are different. An example of a symmetric flute is provided in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2003/0121845 to Wagner et al. The disclosure of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2003/0121845 is incorporated herein by reference.
Now referring to
Darted Flutes
An exemplary darting technique that can be used to close flutes in filtration media according to the invention is shown in
In general, darting can occur to provide closure after a facer bead 190 is applied for securing a fluted sheet 204 to a facing sheet 206. In general, and as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2006/0163150, an indenting or darting wheel can be used to form the flutes 200 as shown in
Attention is now directed to
Still referring to
In
The terms “upper” and “lower” as used in this context are meant specifically to refer to the fold 220, when viewed from the orientation of
Based upon these characterizations and review of
A third layer 228 can also be seen pressed against the second layer 224. The third layer 228 is formed by folding from opposite inner ends 230, 231 of the third layer 228. In certain preferred implementations, the facing sheet 206 will be secured to the fluted sheet 196 along the edge opposite from the fold arrangement 218.
Another way of viewing the fold arrangement 218 is in reference to the geometry of alternating peaks 204 and troughs 205 of the corrugated sheet 196. The first layer 222 includes the inverted peak 210. The second layer 224 corresponds to the double peak 216 that is folded toward, and in preferred arrangements, folded against the inverted peak 210. It should be noted that the inverted peak 210 and the double peak 216, corresponding to the second layer 224, is outside of the troughs 205 on opposite sides of the ridge 204. In the example shown, there is also the third layer 228, which extends from folded over ends 230, 231 of the double peak 216.
A process used to provide a dart according to
While the closure technique described in the context of
Plug Length and Flute Height
Z-media is sometimes characterized as having flutes extending from an inlet face to an outlet face and wherein a first portion of the flutes can be characterized as inlet flutes and a second portion of the flutes can be characterized as outlet flutes. The inlet flutes can be provided with a plug or seal near the outlet face, and the outlet flutes can be provided with a plug or seal near or adjacent the inlet face. Of course, alternatives of this arrangement are available. For example, the seals or plugs need not be provided at or adjacent the inlet face or outlet face. The seals or plugs can be provided away from the inlet face or the outlet face, as desired. In the case of hot melt adhesive being used as a seal or plug, it is often found that the plug has a length of at least about 12 mm. The applicants have found that by reducing the plug length, it is possible to increase desirable characteristics of the filtration media including capacity, lower initial pressure drop, reduced amount of media, or combinations thereof. It can be desirable to provide a plug length that is less than about 10 mm, preferably less than about 8 mm, and even more preferably less than about 6 mm.
The flute height (J) can be adjusted as desired depending upon filtration conditions. In the case where a filter element utilizing the media according to the present invention is used as a substitute for a conventional filter element that utilizes, for example, a standard B flute, the height J can be about 0.075 inch to about 0.150 inch. In the case where a filter element utilizing the media according to the present invention is used as a substitute for a conventional filter element that utilizes, for example, a standard A flute, the height J can be about 0.15 inch to about 0.25 inch.
Filter Elements
Now referring to
The air filtration media pack can be provided as part of a filter element containing a radial seal as described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,350,291, U.S. Patent Application No. US 2005/0166561, and International Publication No. WO 2007/056589, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. For example, referring to
The air filtration media pack can be provided as part of a filter element having a variation on the radial seal configuration. As shown in
The air filtration media pack can be provided as part of a filter element according to U.S. Pat. No. 6,235,195, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Now referring to
Now referring to
The handle arrangement 404 includes a center board 408, handles 410, and a hook construction 412. The single facer media can be wound around the center board 408 so that the handles 410 extend axially from a first face 414 of the media pack 402. The hook arrangement 412 can extend from the second face 416 of the media pack 402. The handles 410 allow an operator to remove the filter element 400 from a housing. The hook construction 412 provides for attachment to a cross brace or support structure 420. The hook construction 412 includes hook members 422 and 424 that engage the cross brace or support structure 420. The cross brace or support structure 420 can be provided as part of a seal support structure 430 that extends from the second face 416 and includes a seal support member 432. A seal 434 can be provided on the seal support member to provide a seal between the filter element 400 and a housing. The seal 434 can be characterized as a radial seal when the seal is intended to provide sealing as a result of contact of a radially facing seal surface 436 and a housing seal surface.
The air filtration media pack can be provided as part of a gas turbine system as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,348,085, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. An exemplary gas turbine filtration element is shown at reference number 450 in
Another filter element that can utilize the air filtration media pack is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,126, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Now referring to
The air filtration media pack can be provided as a stacked media pack arrangement according to International Publication No. WO 2006/076479 and International Publication No. WO 2006/076456, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Now referring to
The air filtration media pack can be provided as a stacked media pack arrangement according to International Publication No. WO 2007/133635, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Now referring to
It should be appreciated that, in view of exemplary
Filter elements having media containing various flute designs were compared using filter media performance modeling software. The filter elements were not constructed and tested for this example. Instead, the dimensions of the filter elements and the filter element components, the properties and characteristics of the filter elements and the filter element components, the conditions of use, and the characteristics of the air being filtered were inputted into a computer program that models filter media performance. The filter media performance modeling software was validated based upon tests run on actual Donaldson Company filter media. The results of the computer software modeling are expected to have an error within about 10%. For the purpose of evaluating different filter media design alternatives, it is believed that an error value of within about 10% is sufficiently low that the modeling software can be used to evaluate various design options.
Tables 2-5 include a characterization of the filter element and the computer generated results. The tables identify the size of the element evaluated using the filter media performance modeling software. The element size refers to the overall size of the element. In Tables 2, 4, and 5, the elements are stacked panel z-media elements having a size of 8 inches×12 inches×5 inches. In Table 3, the element is a coiled z-media element having a size of 17 inch diameter×12 inch depth.
The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the filtration media and filter element of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/198,246, filed Mar. 5, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/744,200, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,734,557, issued May 27, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/110,742, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,361,183, issued Jan. 29, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/012,785, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,959,702, issued Jun. 14, 2011, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/899,311 filed Feb. 2, 2007, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2058669 | Dollinger | Oct 1936 | A |
| 2410371 | Gordon | Oct 1946 | A |
| 2514505 | Morton | Jul 1950 | A |
| 2514506 | Mueller | Jul 1950 | A |
| 2599604 | Bauer et al. | Jun 1952 | A |
| 2908350 | Buckman | Oct 1959 | A |
| 2960145 | Ruegenberg | Nov 1960 | A |
| 2980208 | Neumann | Apr 1961 | A |
| 3025963 | Bauer | Mar 1962 | A |
| 3053309 | Saunders et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
| 3058594 | Hultgren | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3062378 | Briggs | Nov 1962 | A |
| 3077148 | Mumby | Feb 1963 | A |
| 3146197 | Getzin | Aug 1964 | A |
| 3198336 | Hyslop | Aug 1965 | A |
| 3372533 | Rummel | Mar 1968 | A |
| 3485485 | Faigle | Dec 1969 | A |
| 3531920 | Hart | Oct 1970 | A |
| 3799354 | Buckman et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3807150 | Maracle | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3948712 | Stannard | Apr 1976 | A |
| 4102792 | Harris | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4154688 | Pall | May 1979 | A |
| 4268290 | Barrington | May 1981 | A |
| 4290889 | Erickson | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4310419 | Nara et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4389315 | Crocket | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4410316 | Yoke | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4410427 | Wydeven | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4439321 | Taki et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4452619 | Wright et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4488966 | Schaeffer | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4537812 | Elbers | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4589983 | Wydevan | May 1986 | A |
| 4615804 | Wright | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4617072 | Merz | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4652286 | Takao | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4732678 | Humbert, Jr. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4735720 | Kersting | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4766453 | Shiokama et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4915878 | Fabry et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4925561 | Ishii et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4954249 | Gero et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 5002666 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5049326 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5066400 | Rocklitz et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5080790 | Widmann | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5089202 | Lippold | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5120296 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5128039 | Gabrielson | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5240540 | Matsumoto et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5262899 | Iizuka | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5274413 | Nomura et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5290447 | Lippold | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5346519 | Williams et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5419796 | Miller | May 1995 | A |
| 5435870 | Takagaki et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5487224 | Gabalda et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5522909 | Haggard et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5562825 | Yamada et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5591329 | Davidson | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5613992 | Engel | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5766289 | Haggard | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5772883 | Rothman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| D396098 | Gillingham | Jul 1998 | S |
| 5792247 | Gillingham et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| D398046 | Gillingham | Sep 1998 | S |
| 5804014 | Kahler | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5804073 | Horst | Sep 1998 | A |
| D399944 | Gillingham | Oct 1998 | S |
| 5820646 | Gillingham et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5851250 | Sugie et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5871641 | Davidson | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5882288 | Paul et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888262 | Kahler | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5895574 | Friedmann et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902364 | Tokar et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5904793 | Gorman et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5970609 | Shioda | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5987399 | Wegerich et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6039778 | Coulonvaux | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6048298 | Paul et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| D428128 | Gillingham | Jul 2000 | S |
| 6089761 | Sakurai et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6179890 | Ramos | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| D437401 | Ramos | Feb 2001 | S |
| 6190432 | Gieseke et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6202038 | Wegerich et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210469 | Tokar | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6235195 | Tokar | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6238561 | Liu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6348084 | Gieseke | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6348085 | Tokar | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6350291 | Gieseke | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6350296 | Warner | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6402800 | Rey | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6433748 | Ekelund | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6517598 | Anderson | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6544310 | Badeau et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6554503 | Imanari et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6582490 | Miller et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6598749 | Paul et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6610117 | Gieseke et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6610126 | Xu | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6620223 | Bloomer | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6673136 | Gillingham et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6685833 | Lippold | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6743270 | Oda et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6746518 | Gieseke et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6783565 | Gieseke et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6790397 | Richerson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6846342 | Mertz et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6848435 | Kitamura et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6893282 | Schadhauser | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6946012 | Miller | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6953124 | Winter et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6955775 | Chung et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6966940 | Krisko et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6986842 | Bortnik et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7070642 | Scott et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7122068 | Tate et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7149153 | Meylan | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7166216 | Woodard, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7213595 | Capon et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7235115 | Duffy | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7258719 | Miller et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7270693 | Chung et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7311747 | Adamek et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7329326 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7396375 | Nepsund et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7396376 | Schrage et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7425227 | Hutchison et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7438812 | Denton et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7488365 | Golden et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7556663 | Niakan | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7588619 | Chilton et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7622063 | Brandner et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7625419 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7661540 | Choi | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7754041 | Brandner et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7927393 | Sanami | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7959702 | Rocklitz et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7997425 | Golden et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8034145 | Boehrs et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8042694 | Driml et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8226786 | Risch et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8241384 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8268053 | Risch et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8277532 | Osendorf et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8292983 | Reichter et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8361183 | Rocklitz et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8397920 | Moy et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8409316 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8460442 | Risch et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8496723 | Osendorf et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8512499 | Golden et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8545589 | Rocklitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8673196 | Treier et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8685128 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8702830 | Muter | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8734557 | Rocklitz et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8814972 | Waibel et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8961722 | Murphy et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 9084957 | Rocklitz | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9103470 | Cik | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9433884 | Rocklitz et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9517430 | Rocklitz et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9808752 | Moe et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9855519 | Rocklitz | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 10058812 | Rocklitz | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10363513 | Moe | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 20020046654 | Bloomer | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020060183 | Paul et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020108359 | Powell | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174770 | Badeau et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030033952 | Tanner | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037675 | Gillingham et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030056479 | Lemaster | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030075500 | Kleingünther et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121845 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040060269 | Chung et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040060861 | Winter et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20050139544 | Choi | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144916 | Adamek et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050166561 | Schrage | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050217226 | Sundet et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050223687 | Miller et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050252182 | Golden et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060005518 | Duffy et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060021926 | Woodard | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060042209 | Dallas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060042210 | Dallas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060091066 | Driml et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060091084 | Merritt et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060117730 | Chung et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060151383 | Choi | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060163150 | Golden et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060246260 | Sundet et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060272305 | Morgan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070039296 | Schrage et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209343 | Cuvelier et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070251634 | Choi | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080022643 | Fox et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209875 | Treier et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080216654 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282890 | Rocklitz et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090102094 | Golden et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090127211 | Rocklitz et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090188219 | Sanami et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090211696 | Moe et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090302390 | Van Dal et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100032365 | Moe | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100078379 | Rocklitz | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20110186504 | Rocklitz | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110277431 | Rocklitz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120196733 | Moe et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120312167 | Wagner et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130228077 | Rocklitz et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140182251 | Rocklitz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140325946 | Rocklitz et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150375142 | Rocklitz | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20170028341 | Rocklitz et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20180214797 | Rocklitz | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20190054412 | Rocklitz | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 557255 | May 1958 | CA |
| 2676825 | Apr 2015 | CA |
| 1902384 | Jan 2007 | CN |
| 3815145 | Oct 1989 | DE |
| 8910110 | Feb 1990 | DE |
| 10113077 | Apr 2002 | DE |
| 60033469 | Oct 2007 | DE |
| 0504038 | Sep 1992 | EP |
| 0522692 | Jan 1993 | EP |
| 0783914 | Jul 1997 | EP |
| 1249261 | Oct 2002 | EP |
| 1410832 | Apr 2004 | EP |
| 1343573 | Mar 2005 | EP |
| 1595590 | Nov 2005 | EP |
| 1681087 | Jul 2006 | EP |
| 1785604 | May 2007 | EP |
| 2514504 | Oct 2012 | EP |
| 2829310 | Jan 2015 | EP |
| 3293833 | Mar 2018 | EP |
| 1477095 | Apr 1967 | FR |
| 1336841 | Nov 1973 | GB |
| 2395537 | Apr 2006 | GB |
| 1973004670 | Feb 1973 | JP |
| 1984006916 | Jan 1984 | JP |
| 5982919 | May 1984 | JP |
| 60071018 | Apr 1985 | JP |
| 61011921 | Apr 1986 | JP |
| S61200116 | Sep 1986 | JP |
| S64085109 | Mar 1989 | JP |
| 01128811 | May 1989 | JP |
| H01163410 | Jun 1989 | JP |
| 1-163408 | Nov 1989 | JP |
| 2-25009 | Feb 1990 | JP |
| 3229230 | Oct 1991 | JP |
| H06064709 | Mar 1994 | JP |
| 3006350 | Jan 1995 | JP |
| 8238413 | Sep 1996 | JP |
| 08309138 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| H08309138 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 1997507156 | Jul 1997 | JP |
| 01163410 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| 2002113798 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002303122 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2003166446 | Jun 2003 | JP |
| 2004089982 | Mar 2004 | JP |
| 5728525 | Apr 2015 | JP |
| 8400014 | Jan 1984 | WO |
| 9302769 | Feb 1993 | WO |
| 9517943 | Jul 1995 | WO |
| 9744128 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| 199740918 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| 9908771 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| 2002049741 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 2003033952 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| 2003047722 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| 2004007054 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| 2004039746 | May 2004 | WO |
| 2004082795 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| 2005077487 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| 2005082484 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2005123222 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2006014941 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006017790 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006076456 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2006076479 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2006132717 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| 2007056589 | May 2007 | WO |
| 2007133635 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 2008095196 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2009003119 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009100067 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| 2010011910 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2011017352 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| 2011091432 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510896382.5 dated Nov. 29, 2017 (14 pages) with English translation. |
| Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510507854.3 dated Feb. 13, 2017 (8 pages) with English translation. |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 09708023.8 dated Feb. 9, 2018 (4 pages). |
| Grounds for Opposition for European Patent Application No. 09790799.2 on behalf of Mann+Hummel International GmbH & Co. KG, filed Aug. 22, 2017 (23 pages). |
| Grounds for Opposition for European Patent Application No. 09790799.2 on behalf of Mann+Hummel International GmbH & Co. Kg, filed Aug. 23, 2017 (7 pages). |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,956 dated Mar. 26, 2018 (23 pages). |
| Response to Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/013,631 filed on Nov. 17, 2017 (11 pages). |
| Response to Final Rejection dated Dec. 13, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,956 submitted via EFS-Web on Mar. 9, 2018, 13 pages. |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 14166293.2 dated Jul. 20, 2017 (6 pages). |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/013,631 dated Aug. 17, 2017 (23 pages). |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,993 dated Aug. 14, 2017 (10 pages). |
| Notice of Opposition for European Patent Application No. 09790799.2 on behalf of MAHLE International GmbH, dated Sep. 15, 2017 (13 pages) with translation through Google Translate. |
| Notice of Opposition for European Patent Application No. 09790799.2 on behalf of Mann+Hummel International GmbH & Co. Kg, dated Sep. 15, 2017 (45 pages) with translation through Google Translate. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014114346, dated Aug. 4, 2017 (23 pages) with English translation. |
| Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510828027.4 dated Sep. 11, 2017 (15 pages) with English Translation. |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 10807046.7 dated Jan. 31, 2018 (5 pages). |
| Reconsideration Report for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-043876 dated Dec. 12, 2017 (2 pages), English translation. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,956 dated Dec. 13, 2017 (15 pages). |
| Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2012/001455 received by the associate Nov. 14, 2017 (5 pages) with English summary. |
| Decision of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-043876 dated Jun. 20, 2017 (4 pages) with English translation. |
| First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510896382.5 dated Mar. 27, 2017 (17 pages). |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,616 dated Jul. 6, 2017 (9 pages). |
| File History for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,993 (downloaded from USPTO Website Mar. 5, 2017), 243 pages. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-233484 dated Sep. 4, 2017 (7 pages) with English translation. |
| Final Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510507854.3 dated Oct. 9, 2017 (14 pages) with English translation. |
| CN Decision by Rexam Board for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131774.5 dated Apr. 21, 2017 (15 pages) no English translation available. |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 11703321.7 dated May 10, 2017 (5 pages). |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/708,993 dated Jun. 9, 2017 (15 pages). |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/013,631 dated May 2, 2017 (13 pages). |
| Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2012/001455 dated May 4, 2017 (3 pages), translation only. |
| Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2016202520 dated Nov. 21, 2016 (2 pages). |
| Examiner's Report for Canadian Application No. 2676825 dated Sep. 11, 2013, 3 pages. |
| Examiner's Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2691867 dated Jan. 30, 2015 (3 pages). |
| Figures 1-6 from Japanese Patent JP2-12923, dated Oct. 2002, 3 pages. |
| File History for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/215,718, (downloaded from USPTO Website Dec. 8, 2014), 214 pages. |
| File History for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/110,742 (downloaded from USPTO Website Dec. 8, 2014), 148 pages. |
| File History for Related U.S. Appl. No. 12/322,616 downloaded Feb. 22, 2017, 564 pages. |
| File History for Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,956 downloaded Feb. 22, 2017, 478 pages. |
| File History for Related U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,944 downloaded Feb. 2, 2017, 164 pages. |
| File History for Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/013,631 downloaded Feb. 22, 2017, 824 pages. |
| File History for Related U.S. Appl. No. 13/744,200 downloaded Feb. 22, 2017, 290 pages. |
| File History for Related U.S. Appl. No. 14/040,929 downloaded Feb. 22, 2017, 576 pages. |
| File History for Related U.S. Appl. No. 14/198,246 downloaded Feb. 22, 2017, 362 pages. |
| File History for Related U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,824 downloaded Feb. 22, 2017, 363 pages. |
| File History for Related European Application Serial No. 09790799.2-1371 downloaded from the EPO Register Feb. 22, 2017, 830 pages. |
| File History for Related European Application Serial No. 11703321.7-1370 downloaded from the EPO Register Feb. 22, 2017, 344 pages. |
| File History for Related European Application Serial No. 09708023.8-1370 downloaded from the EPO Register Feb. 22, 2017, 223 pages. |
| File History for Related European Application Serial No. 10807046.7-1370 downloaded from the EPO Register Feb. 22, 2017, 274 pages. |
| File History for related Application Serial No. 12/012,785 downloaded Dec. 8, 2014, 103 pages. |
| File History from related European Application Serial No. 08714184.2-2113, now Issued EP Patent No. 2117672, (downloaded from EPO Register Nov. 25, 2014), 152 pages. |
| File History from related European Application Serial No. 08781029.7-1365, now Issued EP Patent No. 2170488, (downloaded from EPO Register Nov. 25, 2014), 134 pages. |
| File History from related European Application Serial No. 12163091.7, (downloaded from EPO Register Feb. 3, 2015), 127 pages. |
| File History from related European Application Serial No. 12163098.2-1356, (downloaded from EPO Register Feb. 3, 2015), 132 pages. |
| File History from related European Application No. 12163105.5-1356, (downloaded from EPO Register Feb. 3, 2015), 130 pages. |
| File History from related European Application No. 14166293.2, (downloaded from EPO Register Feb. 3, 2015), 117 pages. |
| Final Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-114346 dated Aug. 5, 2016 (3 pages). |
| Final Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-043876 dated Nov. 8, 2016 (9 pages) with English translation. |
| Final Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-077921 dated Feb. 17, 2017 (5 pages) with English summary. |
| Final Rejection for Chinese Application No. 200980103965.0 dated May 14, 2013 (14 pages) including English translation. |
| Final Rejection for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080037254.0 dated Mar. 30, 2015 (15 pages) with English translation. |
| Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-232560 dated Jan. 5, 2016 (3 pages) with English Summary. |
| First Chinese Office Action Received First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200880006683.4, dated May 31, 2011, Including English translation, 7 pages. |
| First Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2011207507 dated Dec. 1, 2015 (3 pages). |
| First Examination Report for India Patent Application No. 283/KOLNP/2010 dated Dec. 30, 2014 (3 pages). |
| First Examination Report for India Patent Application No. 3070/KOLNP/2009 dated Aug. 7, 2014 (2 pages). |
| First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 3243/KOLNP/2010 dated Oct. 12, 2015 (2 pages). |
| First Examiner Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2014201109 dated Jul. 20, 2015 (3 pages). |
| First Examiner Report from Australian Application No. 2008268271, dated Feb. 24, 2012, 2 pages. |
| First Examiner's Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2013270543 dated Apr. 23, 2015 (3 pages). |
| First Office Action for Application U.S. Appl. No. 200980131774.5 dated Mar. 20, 2013, with English translation (14 pages). |
| First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200880104082.7 dated Aug. 9, 2013 (7 pages) with English translation. |
| First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200980103965.0, dated Jul. 20, 2012, (pp. 1-18) Including English translation. |
| First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201080037254.0 dated Oct. 29, 2013, with English translation (20 pages). |
| First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180011588.5 (with English translation) dated Mar. 4, 2014 (30 pages). |
| First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 20120181182.8 dated Feb. 21, 2014 (16 pages) with English translation. |
| First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210180467.X dated Jan. 28, 2014 (10 pages) with English translation. |
| First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210181810.2 dated Jan. 10, 2014 (8 pages) with English translation. |
| First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510507854.3 dated Jun. 28, 2016 (15 pages) with English translation. |
| First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510828027.4 dated Dec. 16, 2016 (14 pages) with English Translation. |
| First Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-077921 dated Jul. 4, 2016 (6 pages) with English Translation. |
| First Office Action Received for Australian Application No. 2008210304, dated Nov 23, 2011 (2 pages). |
| Fourth Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131774.5 dated Apr. 29, 2015 (14 pages) with English translation. |
| Fourth Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210180467.X dated Dec. 29, 2015 (10 pages) with English translation. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2009/032965 dated Aug. 19, 2010 (9 pages). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability from International Application No. PCT/US2008/068394, dated Jan. 14, 2010 (9 pages). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability from International Application No. PCT/US2010/044286, dated Feb 16, 2012, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/032965 dated May 18, 2009 (13 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2008/052961, dated Jun. 11, 2008 (13 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2008/068394, dated Oct. 7, 2008, (11 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2010/044286 dated Apr. 14, 2011, 10 pages. |
| Non Final Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210181810.2 dated on Feb. 10, 2015 (13 pages) with English translation. |
| Non-Final Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2011-520223 dated Jun. 4, 2013, with English translation (5 pages). |
| Non-Final Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-263546 dated Nov. 10, 2015 (5 pages) with English Summary. |
| Notification for Patent Reexamination for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131774.5 dated Nov. 18, 2016 (16 pages) with English translation. |
| Notification for Patent Reexamination for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080037254.0 dated Oct. 26, 2015 (9 pages) with English translation. |
| Office Action by the Appeal Examiner for Japanese Patent Application No. 2010545266 dated Dec. 11, 2015 (3 pages) with English Summary. |
| Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200880104082.7 dated Feb. 12, 2015 (6 pages) with English Translation. |
| Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2012-523711, with English translation, dated Jul. 1, 2014 (5 pages). |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-043876 dated Mar. 1, 2016 (6 pages) with English translation. |
| Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2012/001455 dated Apr. 7, 2016 (2 pages), translation only. |
| Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2012/001455 received by the associate Dec. 7, 2016 (2 pages), translation only. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2009/051670, dated Feb. 9, 2010, 26 pages. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2011/022446, dated Apr. 5, 2011, 15 pages. |
| PCT Notification Concerning Transmittal of Copy of International Preliminary Report on from International Application No. PCT/US2011/022446 dated Aug. 9, 2012, 12 pages. |
| PCT Notification Concerning Transmittal of Copy of International Preliminary Report on Patentability from International Application No. PCT/US2009/051670, dated Feb. 3, 2011, 15 pages. |
| Response to Chinese Office Action dated May 31, 2011 Filed in the Chinese Patent Office on Dec 15, 2011 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880006683.4, 12 pages., 12. |
| Response to Examiner's Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,691,867 dated and filed with the CIPO Jul. 30, 2015 (86 pages). |
| Response to First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 283/KOLNP/2010, filed with the IPO Dec. 28, 2015 (54 pages). |
| Response to First Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2010-515132, submitted Sep. 19, 2012, (11 pages) Including English translation of claim amendments. |
| Second Examiner's Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2691867 dated Nov. 2, 2015 (3 pages). |
| Second Non-Final Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180011588.5 dated Dec. 25, 2014 (9 pages) with English translation. |
| Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200880104082.7 dated Mar. 11, 2014 (49 pages) with English translation. |
| Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 2009801039650 dated Oct. 29, 2014 (6 pages) including English translation. |
| Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131774.5 dated Jan. 24, 2014 (12 pages) including English translation. |
| Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080037254.0 dated Nov. 15, 2014 (15 pages) with English translation. |
| Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210180467.X dated Nov. 2, 2014 (7 pages) with English translation. |
| Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210181182.8 dated Dec. 9, 2014 (6 pages) with English translation. |
| Second Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/000965 dated Nov. 6, 2014 (2 pages). |
| Third Non Final Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180011588.5 dated Jun. 15, 2015 (7 pages) with English translation. |
| Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131774.5 dated Jan. 16, 2015 (15 pages) with English translation. |
| Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210180467.X dated Jul. 6, 2015 (8 pages) with English translation. |
| Third Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/000965 dated Apr. 27, 2014 (2 pages). |
| Translation of Final Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011520223 dated Sep. 2, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Translation of Mexican Office Action Received, Mexican Application No. MX/a/2009/008242 dated Jun. 8, 2012, 1 page. |
| Translation of Office Action for Mexican Application No. MX/a/2010/008530 dated Jul. 10, 2014 (3 pages). |
| Translation of Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/2010/008530 dated on Jan. 30, 2015 (3 pages). |
| Translation of Office Action for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2010/008530 dated Dec. 3, 2013 (2 pages). |
| Translation of Office Action for Mexico Application No. MX/a/2010/008530 dated May 28, 2013 (3 pages). |
| Translation of Office Action for Mexico Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/000965 dated Apr. 28, 2015 (2 pages). |
| Translation of Office Action from Mexican Application No. MX/a/2009/014134 dated Apr. 19, 2012 (3 pages). |
| Type 101 Automatic Corrugator, Solent Technology Deep Pleating Equipment http://www.solentech.com/html/101_info.html Dec. 23, 2009, 1 page. |
| Type 102 Computerized Pleating System, Solent Technology Deep Pleating Equipment http://www.solentech.com/html/102_info.html Dec. 23, 2009, 1 page. |
| Type 103 Box Pleater, Solent Technology Deep Pleating Equipment http://www.solentech.com/html/103_info.html Dec. 23, 2009, 1 page. |
| Type 104 Blade Pleater, Solent Technology Deep Pleating Equipment http://www.solentech.com/html/104_info.html Dec. 23, 2009, 1 page. |
| Type 106 Dedicated Pleating System, Solent Technology Deep Pleating Equipment http://www.solentech.com/html/106_info.html Dec. 23, 2009, 1 page. |
| Type 202 Computerized Pleating System, Solent Technology Deep Pleating Equipment http://www.solentech.com/html/202_info.html Dec. 23, 2009, 1 page. |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 09708023.8 dated Feb. 9, 2017 (5 pages). |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 12163091.7 dated Aug. 2, 2016 (6 pages). |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 12163091.7 dated Jun. 23, 2017 (5 pages). |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 12163098.2 dated Jun. 30, 2017 (4 pages). |
| Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 14166293.2 dated Jul. 27, 2016 (4 pages). |
| Final Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-077921 dated Jun. 20, 2017 (8 pages) with English translation. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-233484 dated May 7, 2018 (10 pages) with English translation. |
| Response to Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,956, submitted via EFS-Web on Jun. 25, 2018, 13 pages. |
| Response to Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/013,631 filed on Apr. 16, 2018 (11 pages). |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,824 dated Sep. 28, 2018 (92 pages). |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-043876 dated Jun. 26, 2018 (15 pages) with English translation. |
| Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510896382.5 dated Jul. 12, 2018 (20 pages) with English translation. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,956 dated Oct. 24, 2018 (32 pages). |
| First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 2038/KOLNP/2012 dated Jul. 27, 2018 (6 pages). |
| First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 486/KOLNP/2012 dated Jun. 27, 2018 (9 pages). |
| Fourth Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510896382.5 dated Jan. 11, 2019 (18 pages) with English Translation. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-043876 dated Nov. 13, 2018 (2 pages), English translation. |
| Response to Final Rejection dated Oct. 24, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,956, submitted via EFS-Web on Dec. 23, 2018, 9 pages. |
| Response to Non-Final Rejection dated Sep. 28, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,824, submitted via EFS-Web on Dec. 28, 2018, 11 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 18164621.7 dated Nov. 20, 2018 (8 pages). |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/388,956 dated Mar. 12, 2019 (16 pages). |
| Notice of Opposition for European Patent Application No. 11703321.7 on behalf of MAHLE International GmbH, dated Feb. 1, 2019 (33 pages). |
| Technical Examination Report for Brazilian Patent Application No. 1120120185209 dated Jan. 29, 2019 (2 pages) English Translation Only. |
| Technical Examination Report for Brazilian Patent Application No. PI 0907653-0 dated Dec. 11, 2018 (6 pages) English Translation only. |
| Examiner's Pre-Review Report for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-233484 dated Apr. 19, 2019 (10 pages) with English Summary. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,824 dated Apr. 3, 2019 (19 pages). |
| First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201710616416.X dated Apr. 24, 2019 (15 pages) with English Translation. |
| First Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-203639 dated Feb. 4, 2019 (6 pages) with English Summary. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,021 dated Jul. 25, 2019 (52 pages). |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,824 dated Aug. 19, 2019 (9 pages). |
| Office Action for Brazilian Patent Application No. PI0915931-2 dated Jun. 4, 2019 (5 pages) English Translation Only. |
| Response to Final Rejection dated Apr. 3, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,824 submitted via EFS-Web on Jul. 3, 2019, 9 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170216758 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60899311 | Feb 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14198246 | Mar 2014 | US |
| Child | 15372944 | US | |
| Parent | 13744200 | Jan 2013 | US |
| Child | 14198246 | US | |
| Parent | 13110742 | May 2011 | US |
| Child | 13744200 | US | |
| Parent | 12012785 | Feb 2008 | US |
| Child | 13110742 | US |
