The present invention relates, in general, to top-supported doors, and more particularly to resilient doors suitable for cold storage rooms.
So-called horizontal sliding doors include at least one door panel that is suspended by a carriage that travels along an overhead track. The door panel may be manually or automatically moved from a blocking position to an unblocking position along the overhead track. Wider door openings are often spanned by having two bi-parting door panels. In some instances, the amount of overhead track required to extend beyond the door opening is reduced by having the door panel vertically divided into a number of coupled (e.g., over-lapped, hinged) vertically-separated leaves that take up less horizontal space when moved to the unblocking position.
Cold storage lockers are often accessed through a door opening closed by a sliding door. The panels for this purpose are typically transparent vinyl sheets, minimally insulated flexible panels or foam filled rigid panels. The transparent vinyl sheets are selected to reduce the likelihood of damage to the door. In particular, such doors are used in institutional (e.g., warehouse) setting wherein palletized cargo is moved in and out of a cold storage locker by forklift. Another advantage to these doors is that forklift operators can see what is on the other side of the door before opening the door. Although providing damage resistance, these types of panels have a very low insulation value and are too flexible to provide an effective air seal between the environments on either side of the opening. Because of the properties of the material, the transparent vinyl sheets may develop a warp that prevents a good seal. Air pressure differentials will cause leakage due to the lack of a compressive seal between the door panels and the doorframe. This will allow a significant amount of warm moist air to enter the cold storage locker and/or refrigerated air to be lost into an unrefrigerated space. Consequently, such door systems are less efficient to operate and can suffer from ice accumulation in the cold storage locker.
Rigid door panels are often used, especially in the United States, in order to reduce the operating costs of a cold storage locker. The rigid panel provides a consistent surface to seal to the doorframe. The thickness of the rigid door panel is selected to provide a specific amount of insulation. While these rigid door panels provide an effective closure, impact by a forklift can cause damage to the door system that would make them inoperative and limit access to the cold storage locker.
Attempts have been made to provide a damage resistant door panel for a sliding door system that also provides sufficient insulation. Resilient door panels have been suggested which have sufficient thickness to insulate like a rigid door panel, but yield to a degree when impacted by a forklift. While the panel itself achieves a degree of insulation, the insulation capability of the overall door system suffers from poor sealing between panels and poor sealing between a panel and the doorframe. Specifically, the stiffness of each door panel tends to be less than that of a rigid door panel, and thus presents less of a compressive contact to a doorframe gasket to achieve a seal. To achieve a seal with this type of panel different devices have been tried. Interlocking gaskets can be damaged as the door is pulled away from the casing. In addition they require rigid plates in the door panel for attachment which makes the panel heavier and less resilient. Others have used wall mounted guide tracks to pull the middle of the door back. This adds additional cost, makes installation more difficult and does not address sealing of the entire edge of the door; it only forces a seal at the top, bottom and middle. Because of the application it is difficult to add electrical wiring to the panel because it is flexible and could be torn open and damage or expose wiring. Condensation control on the panel is typically done using resistance wire but that will does not work because of the panel design. Others have tried using external heaters and blowers that are an inefficient means of controlling the condensation.
Consequently, a significant need exists for an improved door system that is suitable for institutional cold storage lockers by providing significant thermal insulation, efficient condensation control yet being resistant to damage from impacts.
The invention overcomes the above-noted and other deficiencies of the prior art by providing a resilient door panel for a sliding door system that achieves a good seal to a doorframe by attracting the door panel. The compressive seal is achieved without reliance upon a rigid back surface of the door panel, or upon the weight of the door panel. Therefore, materials and assembly methods may be selected for a desired resilience, insulation and economy of manufacture.
In one particular aspect of the invention, a resilient door panel is used in a closure system. A seal formed between a doorframe and the door panel is effectively achieved by attracting the door panel to the doorframe either pneumatically or magnetically. Eliminating the need for rigid components in the door panel enables the use of numerous manufacturing approaches, such as bagged foam sheets, bagged poured foam door panels, and even unbagged foam doors that self-skin. Thereby, the manufacturing steps are greatly reduced and thus the cost of each door panel.
In another aspect of the invention, an approach to keeping the door seals free of ice is provided that is particularly suitable to resilient door panels. In particular, since the resilient door panel readily flexes, it is desirable to eliminate electrical wiring in the door panel that may be damaged during impact. Thus, heating of a door panel periphery by electrical resistive heating is eliminated;
however, it is desirable to ensure that the seals between the doorframe/door panel, door panel/floor and door panel/door panel does not accumulate frost. Otherwise, the door system drive mechanism or the seal may be damaged in attempting to overcome a frozen seal. The door system may fail to open altogether if sufficiently stuck to stall the drive mechanism. Other problems associated with frost accumulation include achieving a poor seal with the resulting economic inefficiencies and safety and appearance issues related to accumulating ice and moisture.
In yet a further aspect of the invention, an automated door system includes a door position sensor that senses the door panel being in a closed position with a periphery of a door panel registered to a doorframe. A door positioning system responds to the door position sensor indicating that the door has been impacted by resetting the door panel to an open position, thereby mitigating possible damage to the door system.
Thus, in another aspect of the invention, a frost control system is incorporated into the closure system to warm the refrigerated air from the cold storage locker, which advantageously tends to contain less water vapor than air from the unrefrigerated side of the door. The warmed air is directed through an air passage to proximity of a periphery of the door panel and its seal to the doorframe. In particular versions of the invention, this air passage includes passing inside of the door panel.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention shall be made apparent from the accompanying drawings and the description thereof.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention, and, together with the general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the present invention.
Turning to the Drawings wherein like numbers denote like components throughout the several views, in
With particular reference to
With particular reference to
With particular reference to
In
In
In
Alternatively, a composite pad (not shown) may be formed from a rigid material of polyurethane insulation, typically used in rigid door panels, in place of the polyethylene slab 81. Flexibility is achieved by dividing the urethane insulation into a plurality of mosaic, tile-like pieces. The pieces are held in place between the neoprene sheets 78, 80. The size of the pieces may advantageously be chosen for the desired degree of flexibility. For example, the tile size may be reduced at lower portions more prone to impact. Moreover, for a given thickness, the urethane has a higher insulation value than polyethylene. Thus, if more flexibility is desired, the thickness of the panel may be reduced without sacrificing insulation. Alternatively, the same thickness of the panel may be maintained with a realized increase in economic efficiency.
It will be appreciated that a number of materials may be used depending upon the degree of insulation, flexibility, thickness, cost, chemical environment, etc. Additional examples include a silicone sheet, a bead board, cross linked polyethylene, etc.
In
In
In
In
An aluminum extruded guide 104 cradles two resistive electrical cables 106, 108 and is held in place between a ferrous strip 110 and a front surface 112 of the casing 98 by fasteners 114. A primary gasket 116 of PVC or other flexible reinforced fabric is bolted through a strip 117 to the front surface 112 and is wrapped over the ferrous strip 110 and a spacer block 118, over which a secondary gasket 120 is placed and held in place by an angled bracket 122. The secondary gasket 120 may alternatively be positioned outboard of the primary basket 116 as well as inboard at the door opening as depicted. Fasteners 124 pass through the bracket 122, secondary gasket 120, primary gasket 116, spacer block 118 to attach to an inner surface 126 of the casing 98. When the door panel 12 draws near its closed, blocking position, the magnets 82 draw the door panel 12 toward the ferrous strip 110
It will be appreciated that the door panel 12 may include a ferrous target (not shown) rather than a permanent magnet wherein the electromagnet 134 actively holds the door panel 12 closed and is deactivated when opening the door panel 12.
Returning to
In response to user actuation of an opening device, depicted as a door pull rope switch 142, the door controller 136 deactivates the frost control system 26 and may activate the electromagnet 134 (if present) (not shown in
In
Air recycling is shown with a return passage 154 from the door panel 12 to an upstream intake 156 of the blower fan 38. A check valve 158 may be included in the intake manifold 34 to prevent inadvertent porting of return air into the cold space 22. In addition, a pressure relief check valve 160 may advantageously be included in the return passage 154 to prevent damage to the door panel 12 such as during an impact.
In
In
In
In the illustrative embodiment, the restraining devices 208, 210 are rollers but could be any device protruding upwards on the front side of the panels 202, 204. These restraining devices 208, 210 may be attached to the floor or to the door casing. In the latter configuration, the restraining device may require that a bracket go under the door to hold the restraining device. It should be appreciated that the left and right restraining devices 208, 210 may have application in manually opened door systems as well as automatically opened door systems, especially when significant air pressure differential exist at times across the door opening or when the door pads 202, 204 are sufficiently flexible as to needing an urging at their lower portions to seal against the doorframe 212, 214. In some applications, the normal travel of the door panels 202, 204 may maintain the respective restraining device 208, 210 in contact, avoiding any damage when the leading edge of the door panels 202, 204 encounters the restraining device 208, 210 when closing. In other applications, the door panels 202, 204 at their most open position are not in contact with the restraining devices 208, 210. Thus, guides (not shown) may inwardly direct the leading edge of the door panels 202, 204 to counter any outward deflection of the lower portion of the door panel 202, 204.
Although the restraining devices 208, 210 advantageously assists in sealing the flexible door panels 202, 204, mitigating damage from impacts is enhanced by having the restraining devices 208, 210 sufficiently low as to allow an outwardly forced door panels to pop over the restraining device 208, 210. Sufficient lateral travel in the overhead carriage (not shown in
In some applications it is advantageous to retain a normal operation wherein the door remains at all times in contact with the restraining device 208, 210, avoiding impacts to the leading edge, while also providing for the resetting after the door panel 202, 204 is forced outward during an impact. Moreover, it is a further advantage for the door to begin to open when a forklift impacts the door panel 202, 204 to thereby minimize the amount of deflection required for the vehicle to pass through.
To that end, a capability for sensing that the door panels 202, 204 have achieved a fully closed position with an effective seal is provided by left and right sensors, depicted as left and right magnetic field transducers 220, 222 (e.g., Hall effect transducers) that sense the proximity respectively of left and right magnets 216, 218 in respective pads 202, 204. Signal lines 224, 226 to each transducer 220, 222 respectively communicate to a control system (not shown) that respond to the sensed position. It will be appreciated that sensing the magnets 216, 218 takes advantage of magnets that also assist in sealing the door panel 202, 204 to the doorframe 212, 214. However, other types of sensors may be used, such as mechanical limit switches, optical sensors, etc.
In
In
In
In
While the present invention has been illustrated by description of several embodiments and while the illustrative embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications may readily appear to those skilled in the art.
For example, while air warming of the entire periphery of a door panel may be advantageous, in some applications only one, two or three edges may be warmed. For instance, a upper edge and a trailing edge may rely solely on electrical warming in the doorframe as sufficient, whereas the leading edge and bottom edge are internally warmed by air.
While a magnetic attraction is depicted and described for advantageously compressively sealing the door panel to the doorframe, it will be appreciated that other approaches may be employed to attract the door panel to the doorframe. For example, pneumatic suction may created about the doorframe that is presented to pull in the periphery of the door panel.
While air warming of the door panel has been advantageously depicted, it should be appreciated that other warming techniques may be employed that do not rely upon electrical wiring in the door panel. For example, inductive targets may be embedded or affixed to the periphery of a door panel. A radiated electromagnetic signal from the doorframe may then be used to inductively couple power into the inductive targets to cause resistive heating in the door panel.
Air stiffening of the door panel 12 may also be provided separate from a frost control system. For example, separate air tubes dedicated for use as air stiffening bladders may be pressurized and left pressurized rather than recycling the air for heating.
Synergy exists between using these aspects of the invention together in a door system for a cold storage locker; however, it will be appreciated that aspects of the present invention may be used separate and apart from the other features. For instance, separating environments may be very desirable for soundproofing or preventing airborne particulates from passing through the doorway. Another example is coolers that are maintained above freezing. Consequently, the effective sealing of the door panel by attraction may be employed without the need for a frost control system. As a further example, the configuration of how the door panels is positioned may provide sufficient affirmative urging into sealing contact with the doorframe that an attraction capability is not required, although the elimination of frost at the sealing contact may still be desired.
It will be appreciated that aspects of the present invention have application to door systems that fold individual panels in an according fashion in order to require less lateral travel when opened. Furthermore, aspects of the present invention have application to door systems that are not supported from an overhead track.
In the illustrative embodiment of
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3215058 | Anderson | Nov 1965 | A |
3254503 | Rundell | Jun 1966 | A |
3449925 | Barroero | Jun 1969 | A |
3675377 | Suter | Jul 1972 | A |
3859502 | Heaney | Jan 1975 | A |
3869873 | Thomas | Mar 1975 | A |
4084347 | Brown | Apr 1978 | A |
4127765 | Heaney | Nov 1978 | A |
4223482 | Barroero et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4382461 | Schenker | May 1983 | A |
4516482 | Smith | May 1985 | A |
4588235 | Barroero | May 1986 | A |
4619975 | Matzner et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4831780 | Bockwinkel | May 1989 | A |
4855567 | Mueller | Aug 1989 | A |
4941289 | Rolek | Jul 1990 | A |
4950869 | Mueller | Aug 1990 | A |
5035085 | Mamelson et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5111618 | Kaspar et al. | May 1992 | A |
5129184 | Fish | Jul 1992 | A |
5143137 | West | Sep 1992 | A |
5203175 | Farrey et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5255473 | Kaspar et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5271236 | Sweetser | Dec 1993 | A |
5309680 | Kiel | May 1994 | A |
5329781 | Farrey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5418342 | Miller | May 1995 | A |
5584191 | Kwon | Dec 1996 | A |
5729989 | Sunaga et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5924298 | Yoo | Jul 1999 | A |
5927015 | Ghosn et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927095 | Lee | Jul 1999 | A |
5975664 | Banicevic et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6056383 | Banicevic et al. | May 2000 | A |
6144017 | Millett et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152208 | Kalempa et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6225904 | Jaffe et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6226995 | Kalempa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6301913 | Schulak et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330763 | Kern et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6360487 | Kern et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6408636 | Backes et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040134128 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |