None.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system for changing the sound output of an internal combustion engine air induction system by suppressing unwanted noise at selected frequencies and by increasing the emission of sound at desired, preselected frequencies.
2. Related Art
In the world of automotive internal combustion engines, psychoacoustics is important because the motorist's perception of a vehicle's roadworthiness is greatly influenced by the sound of the engine within a vehicle. In other words, motorists listen to their engine as an indication of not only the engine's health, but also the power output of the engine. Needless to say, it is disadvantageous to install a powerful engine in a car or truck, only to have poor sound quality which fails to adequately convey to the driver and passengers the engine's capabilities. And, in any event, it is desirable to suppress sound at certain frequencies to obtain a pleasing sound characteristic, or signature, for an engine. Automotive designers have used Helmholtz resonators in the past to obtain desired induction system tuning. However, such resonators were frequently branched from air induction pipes at odd locations, creating a very odd appearance, with structures which were difficult to package within the confines of the underhood environment of a vehicle.
It would be desirable to provide a noise treatment system for an air induction system of an internal combustion engine, particularly an automotive internal combustion engine, in which the various components of the system are packaged within a single housing which efficiently not only tunes induction sound by suppressing undesired frequencies, but also provides at least a portion of a system promoting desirable frequencies, while minimizing flow losses through the sound treatment device.
According to an aspect of the present invention, an air induction sound modification system for an internal combustion engine includes a multi-frequency sound suppression unit having a housing. An air induction passage extends through the housing, which is preferably constructed with two halves, akin to a clamshell. A number of Helmholtz resonators branch from the air induction passage in the housing. A first expansion chamber is also located within the clamshell housing, downstream from the Helmholtz resonators, with the expansion chamber having a number of quarter wave resonators. A sound generator, including a section of the central air induction passage, extends upstream from the expansion chamber, past the Helmholtz resonators to a second expansion chamber.
According to another aspect of the present invention, an air induction passage extends through the first expansion chamber at a position which, although generally centrally located with reference to the chamber, is, in the preferred embodiment, asymmetric with respect to the expansion chamber. This permits the expansion chamber to be configured with at least two quarter wave resonators which may be used to suppress separate frequencies of undesirable sound.
According to another aspect of the present invention, the central air induction passage enters the sound suppression unit housing at an acute angle and exits from the expansion chamber with an offset which minimizes impingement of the exiting induction air upon a wall of the central induction passage, whereby flow losses will be minimized.
According to another aspect of the present invention, the housing defines not only the first expansion chamber, but also the aforementioned Helmholtz resonators, with the housing having an upper portion and a lower portion, and with each of the Helmholtz resonators having a semi-cylindrical neck segment formed in each of the upper portion and the lower portion of the housing.
It is an advantage of a sound modification system according to the present invention that undesirable induction sounds, having several different frequencies, may be suppressed.
It is another advantage of an induction sound modification system according to the present invention that the majority of components of the system are housed within a single, compact housing.
It is yet another advantage of an induction sound modification system according to the present invention that desirable sound may be not only promoted, but also created by the present system.
Other advantages, as well as features of the present invention, will become apparent to the reader of this specification.
As shown in
Sound generator 18, as noted above, extends between multi-frequency sound suppression unit 14 and air cleaner box 22 (
The foregoing invention has been described in accordance with the relevant legal standards, thus the description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed embodiment may become apparent to those skilled in the art and fall within the scope of the invention. Accordingly the scope of legal protection afforded this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4846300 | Boda | Jul 1989 | A |
5134852 | Weeks | Aug 1992 | A |
5575249 | Mielke et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5756945 | Maeda et al. | May 1998 | A |
6009705 | Arnott et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6199657 | Misawa et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6415889 | Wyatt | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6435303 | Warnaka | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6792907 | Kostun et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6932189 | Helber et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7000583 | Kino et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7198017 | Vogt et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7353791 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7448353 | Shinada et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20080257346 | Lathrop et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090242323 | Densmore et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10-274117 | Oct 1998 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090236172 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |