1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an air intake apparatus for supplying an air to an engine, and in particular to an air intake apparatus enabling to suppress air suction noise. The present invention also relates to an air cleaner for filtering a sucked air to be led to an engine.
2. Description of the Related Art
A schematic view of the air intake apparatus is shown in
However, more noise reduction has been required over the whole range of the frequency of the noise to improve amenities of the inside of the car.
Further, a resonance peak D named as so-called low frequency heavy noise is not caused by each of members composing the intake apparatus 100. The resonance peak D is caused in the full length of the intake path 107 from the intake port 102 to the intake manifold 106. The intake apparatus 100 takes a pipe passage of one-side closed end where the intake port 102 is an opening end, while an intake valve (not shown) partitioning the intake manifold 106 and a combustion chamber 109 otherwise an upper face of a piston, are a closing end. Thus, the resonance peak D in the low frequency range is caused in the full length of the intake path 107. If the frequency of the resonance peak D agrees with an air pulsation transmitted from the side of the engine, the air suction noise radiated from the intake port 102 is made large. It is therefore difficult to lower the resonance peak D, that is, to suppress the low frequency heavy noise.
For suppressing the low frequency heavy noise, the intake duct 101 or the air cleaner 103 of the intake apparatus 100 is arranged with the resonator 110 of comparatively large capacity as around 2×10−3 to 10−2 m3.
There is often a case that a throttled part 111 is often arranged together with the resonator 110 of large capacity nearly the intake port 102 of the intake duct 101 for increasing acoustic mass and decreasing the air sucking noise.
But, as mentioned above, the resonator 110 for controlling the low frequency heavy noise is comparatively large in the capacity, and a whole of the intake apparatus 100 is made large accordingly, so that spaces for mounting other devices than the intake apparatus 100 are made narrow.
If the area of the intake path is throttled by the throttled part 1111 an air flow rate to be supplied to the combustion chamber 109 decreases. In particular, when the engine rotates at high speed, a desired air flow rate is not effected, and an engine output goes down.
It is accordingly an object of the invention to provide such an air intake apparatus capable of being reduced in size, securing the desired engine output, and suppressing the noise.
(1) For solving the above problems, the air intake apparatus of the invention comprises the air intake port opening outside, and the air intake path communicating the air intake port with the combustion chamber of an engine, and is characterized in that, for suppressing noise getting out from the air intake port, with respect to walls partitioning the air intake path, an opening is provided at the part of said walls corresponding to an antinode region of resonance mode of standing wave in the full length of the intake path, or at the part of noise pressure level being high in the intake path, and said opening is closed with a permeable member and a noise insulating wall is disposed outside the permeable member for suppressing emission of transmitting noise passing through the permeable member.
In short, the air intake apparatus of the invention is provided with the opening at the part of the walls corresponding to the antinode of resonance mode, or at the part of noise pressure level being high in the intake path, and this opening is closed with the permeable member. See Unexamined Japanese Patent Publication No. 2002-21660 and “Development of low noise intake system with unreflective duct (Part 2)” published on May 24, 2000 regarding the antinode of resonance mode and noise pressure level in the air intake apparatus.
With the permeable member disposed, the inner pressure of the intake path is released outside from the interior of the intake apparatus via the permeable member, so that a standing wave is thereby suppressed from occurrence. The permeable member has lots of fine pores, and energy of noise wave entering the fine pores is converted into heat energy owing to viscous friction between the air and a wall of the fine pole, so that it is possible to effectively reduce noises (called as “air transmitting noise” hereafter) getting out from the intake path to the outside of the permeable member by air transmission loss. By these actuations, depending on the intake apparatus of the invention, the noise from the intake port may be suppressed.
Further, by the air intake apparatus of the invention, any resonator of large capacity is unnecessary or it becomes possible to reduce the capacity of the resonator. Accordingly, the whole of the intake apparatus may be reduced in size. Disposing the resonator, noise having frequency around the noise demanded to be controlled might be in turn increased by anti-resonance. So, it is necessary to carry out a tuning of the capacity of the resonator. On the other hand, since the air intake apparatus of the invention suppresses the noise by the permeable member, there is no possibility to cause anti-resonance. Accordingly, by the intake apparatus of the invention, it is unnecessary to carry out the tuning for suppression of anti-resonance.
According to the intake apparatus of the invention, it would be possible to reduce the noise even in the case where the throttle part is not formed in the intake duct. Accordingly, the air flow rate for the combustion chamber does not go down, and the desired engine output can be easily secured.
The intake apparatus of the invention is furnished with a noise insulating wall outside of the permeable member for suppressing emission of the air transmitting noise passing through the permeable member. For reducing the sucking noise, the air transmitting noise is made large, but not only the air sucking noise but the air transmitting noise cause noises.
In this regard, the intake apparatus of the invention has the noise insulating wall outside of the permeable member for blocking the transmitting noise having passed through the permeable member from further getting out outside. Accordingly, by the intake apparatus of the invention, not only the sucking noise but the transmitting noise can be controlled. In addition, it is possible to prevent reduction of permeability due to adhering of moisture, foreign materials, or the like to the permeable member according to the intake apparatus of the invention. Accordingly, noise reduction effect can be maintained in the long term.
Furthermore, according to the intake apparatus of the invention, so-called low frequency heavy noise, which is not caused by each of members composing the intake apparatus, may be easily suppressed.
(2) The resonance frequency of said noise is 200 Hz or lower in general. The noise having the resonance peak in this frequency range is especially rasping. By the present structure, this rasping noise can be concentrically suppressed.
(3) In case there is present, in the air cleaner, the part of the walls corresponding to the antinode region of the resonance mode of the standing wave in the full length of the intake path, or the part of noise pressure level being high in the intake path, it is enough to determine the opening is provided in the air cleaner.
In short, the present structure disposes the permeable member and the noise insulating wall in the air cleaner. The wall part of the air cleaner has many planes of face-structure in comparison with wall parts of other members forming the intake apparatus. Accordingly, following this structure, the opening can be comparatively easily provided, and the permeable member is easily and cheaply disposed.
Desirably, since the permeable member is clogged when the water or dusts invade into the air cleaner from the side of the intake duct, so that it is difficult to release the air sucking pulsation pressure from the inside to the outside, the reducing effect of the desired air sucking noise cannot be obtained, and an opening is provided at another wall part than the bottom wall of the air cleaner for arranging the permeable member there.
(4) In case there is present, in a clean side of the air cleaner, the part of the walls corresponding to the antinode region of the resonance mode of the standing wave in the full length of the intake path, or the part of noise pressure level being high in the intake path, it is enough to determine the opening is provided in the clean side of the air cleaner.
The air cleaner is divided by an air filter into an upstream side communicating with the intake port, i.e., a dirty side and a downstream side communicating with the combustion chamber, i.e., the clean side. The sucked air is filtered by passing through the air filter. In this structure, the permeable member and the noise insulating wall may be disposed at the clean side.
(5) In case there is present, in a dirty side of the air cleaner, the part of the walls corresponding to the antinode region of the resonance mode of the standing wave in the full length of the intake path, or the part of noise pressure level being high in the intake path, it is enough to determine the opening is provided in the dirty side of the air cleaner.
(6) In case there is present, in the air cleaner hose, the part of the walls corresponding to the antinode region of the resonance mode of the standing wave in the full length of the intake path, or the part of noise pressure level being high in the intake path, it is enough to determine the opening is provided at least in the air cleaner hose.
The structure disposes the permeable member and the noise insulating wall in the air cleaner hose. The air cleaner hose is disposed at the downstream side of the air cleaner.
(7) In case there is present, in an intake duct, the part of the walls corresponding to the antinode region of the resonance mode of the standing wave in the full length of the intake path, or the part of noise pressure level being high in the intake path, it is enough to determine the opening is provided in the part of the intake duct.
(8) The permeable member preferably has a water repellent property. Following this structure, it is possible to suppress the amount of the moisture entering the inside of the intake path through the permeable member.
(9) Desirably, it is sufficient that the noise insulating wall is structured to have a vibration control member for the noise insulating wall not to cause face-vibration of the permeable member owing to the transmitting noise from the permeable member. When the air transmitting noise reaches the noise insulating wall, the noise insulating wall itself probably generates the face-vibration by the air transmitting noise, and by this face-vibration, a new noise might be caused as a noise source becoming the noise insulating wall itself.
In this point, the noise insulating wall of this structure has the vibration control member for the noise insulating wall. Accordingly, following the structure, the noise insulating wall is less to make the face-vibration, and the noise insulating wall itself is difficult to generate noises.
(10) For solving the above problems, the air intake apparatus of the invention comprises an air intake port, and an air intake path communicating with the air intake port and the combustion chamber of an engine, and is characterized in that, for suppressing noise emitted from the air intake port, with respect to walls partitioning the air intake path, the opening is provided at the part of said walls corresponding to the antinode region of resonance mode of standing wave in the full length of the intake path, or at the part of noise pressure level being high in the intake path, and said opening is closed with the permeable member and has a noise insulating wall for insulating transmitting noise passing through the permeable member, and has vibration control members for suppressing face-vibration of the permeable member and reducing radiant noise from the permeable member.
In short, the air intake apparatus of the invention has the permeable member and the vibration control member. As mentioned above, for lowering the air sucking noise, the transmitting noise is made large. But if an area of disposing the permeable member is enlarged, the permeable member itself probably produces the face-vibration, and by this face-vibration, a new noise might be caused as a noise source being the noise insulating wall itself.
In this point, the air intake apparatus of the invention has the vibration control member for suppressing the face-vibration of the permeable member. According to this structure, even if an area of disposing the permeable member is enlarged, the permeable member is less to make the face-vibration. Therefore, new noises caused by the permeable member itself can be suppressed.
Further, an air cleaner, enabling to suppress not only air suction noises but also air transmitting noises and decrease the number of parts is provided according to the present invention.
(11) For settling the above problems, an air cleaner of the invention comprises a case, an element partitioning the case into a dirty side and a clean side, and a permeable member sectioning a compartment room in the case, and this is characterized in that a noise insulating wall part is formed as one body within the case, said noise insulating wall part being provided with communicating holes for communicating the compartment room with the outside of the case.
In short, the air cleaner of the invention supports the permeable member within the case, and unifies the noise insulating wall to the case wall. The compartment room is partitioned with the permeable member and sectioned within the case. That is, in the case, an exterior and an interior of the compartment room are partitioned by the permeable member. The noise insulating wall part is disposed outside of the compartment room and has communicating holes through which the compartment room communicates with the exterior of the case.
Sound pressure runs along a passage of the exterior of the compartment room→the permeable member→the interior of the compartment room→the noise insulating wall part (communicating holes)→the outside of the case, and gets out from the interior to the exterior of the case. During getting out, a major part of sound pressure having transmitted the permeable member collides against other parts than the communicating holes of the noise insulating wall part, namely, the wall part. By this collision, the air transmitting noise is not directly released outside of the case, but acoustic mass is increased by the communicating holes so that the air transmitting noise can be suppressed.
According to the air cleaner of the invention, not only the air suction noise but the air transmitting noise can be suppressed. Accordingly, in case a noise insulating property is low in a part of installing the air cleaner (e.g., engine room), if installing the air cleaner of the invention, the suppression is especially effective. A reason therefor is because the air cleaner of the invention itself has the high noise insulating property and does not depend on a noise insulating property of the part of installing the air cleaner.
According to the air cleaner of the invention, the noise insulating wall part is formed as one body with the case. Therefore, in comparison with a case of forming the noise insulating wall part independently of the case, constituting parts may be reduced in number, a production cost may be saved accordingly and attachment of the air cleaner is made easy.
(12) Desirably, the noise insulating wall part is arranged at the dirty side of the case. If arranging the noise insulating wall part at the dirty side, even if dusts invade within the case of the air cleaner through the noise insulating wall part and the permeable member, dusts are filtered through the element. Therefore, it is easy to suppress dusts invading from the clean side of the case into a downstream side.
In the accompanying drawings:
Further explanation will be made to embodiments of the air intake apparatus according to the invention.
(1) First Embodiment
At first, the structure of the embodied intake apparatus will be referred to. A schematic view of the air intake apparatus of the embodiment is shown in
The intake duct 3 is made of a resin taking a cylindrical shape, and communicates with an outside of a vehicle via the intake port 30 provided at an upstream end. The resonator 4 for middle and high frequencies is generally made of the resin taking a box shape. The resonator 4 is branched and connected to the intake duct 3 at its middle part in this embodiment but it may be located in other fashions within the air intake apparatus. A capacity, a shape or a communicating part with the intake duct 3 of the resonator 4 are effected with tuning for lowering the resonance peak in the middle and high frequencies of the air sucking noise.
The air cleaner 5 has the dirty side case 50, the clean side case 51, and an element 52.
The clean side case 51 is made of the resin taking the box shape opening downward, mounted on the dirty side case 50 under a condition of turning over the opening, and projects a hose connecting cylinder 510 from a side wall 51 thereof. On an inside of the side wall of the clean side case 51 and an inside of an upper bottom wall, a plurality of U-shaped reinforcing ribs 53 stand following the insides. In the upper bottom wall of the clean side case 51, an oblong opening 80 is formed. A reason why the 80 is formed in the upper bottom wall of the clean side case 51 is because it has been proved by a preliminary simulation analysis that there is positioned an antinode region of the resonance secondary mode of the standing wave at one-side opening end. On the upper bottom wall of the clean side case 51 is included in the wall part of the invention. From the opening 80, the reinforcing ribs are seen in stripe.
The element 52 is a rectangular pleat-process PET non-woven fabric, secured between opening edges of the dirty side case 50 and the clean side case 51 and partitions a closed space defined between the dirty side case 50 and the clean side case 51 into upper and lower chambers.
The permeable member 8 is the PET non-woven fabric taking the rectangular shape. The permeable member 8 may be a woven fabric, a PP non-woven fabric, or the like as far as being permeable. The permeable member 8 closes the opening 80 under a condition that it is supported from the lower part by the reinforcing ribs. The reinforcing ribs 53 are included in the vibration control member of the invention. The permeable member 8 is secured to a periphery of the opening 80 and the reinforcing ribs 53 by known means such as inserting or fusing.
Turning to
Next, effects brought about by the air intake apparatus 1 of the embodiment will be referred to.
As shown, if disposing the permeable member, the resonance peak E of the low frequency heavy noise goes down. Practically, in case of t=1 mm, the resonance peak E lowers by about 3 dB, while in case of t=2 mm, it lowers by about 10 dB. In view of the resonance peak decreasing effect by the resonator being about 5 dB to 10 dB, it is seen that the permeable member has a substantially equivalent resonance peak decreasing effect to that of the resonator. From the fact that the decreasing rate of the resonance peak E is larger in t=2 mm than t=1 mm, it is seen that the larger is the thickness of the permeable member, the lower is the density, the larger is the resonance peak decreasing effect in sucking noise. Hereupon, by suppressing the compression amount of the raw member for the permeable member during the manufacturing process of the permeable member, the density of the permeable member can be lowered and its permeability is made higher. Further, it is seen that the resonance peak decreasing effect is large in the low frequency range of in particular more than 30 Hz to less than 150 Hz.
According to the intake apparatus 1 of the embodiment, any resonator of large capacity is unnecessary or it becomes possible to reduce the capacity of the resonator. The whole of the intake apparatus 1 can be therefore reduced in size. Further, according to the permeable member 8 in the intake apparatus 1 of the embodiment, there is no possibility of causing anti-resonance. The noise can be therefore more easily suppressed. Depending on the intake apparatus 1 of the embodiment, the noise can be effectively controlled without placing the throttle in the air intake duct 3. The desired engine output can be easily therefore secured.
The intake apparatus 1 of the embodiment is furnished with the reinforcing ribs 53 as the vibration control member. Therefore, even if the area of the air passing is large in the permeable member 8, possibility of the permeable member 8 causing the face-vibration is scarce. The reinforcing ribs 53 may be formed of the same material as that of the clean side case 51, i.e., the air cleaner case, may be formed at the same time as forming the air cleaner case, and may be formed by inserting the permeable member 8 when forming the air cleaner case so as to unify the air cleaner case and the permeable member 8 and concurrently unify the permeable member 8 and the reinforcing ribs 53. In addition, the permeable member 8 of the embodied air intake apparatus 1 may be placed at the clean side of the air cleaner case.
(2) Second Embodiment
A difference of this embodiment from the first embodiment is that the noise insulating wall is arranged outside of the permeable member.
At first, explanation will be made to a structural difference of the intake apparatus of this embodiment.
Next, explanation will be made to different effects of this embodied air intake apparatus from those in the first embodiment.
As shown, in the case of L=1 mm, comparing with a case of having the only permeable member and not having the noise insulating wall, the resonance peak E of the low frequency heavy noise its high. In the case of L=10 mm, comparing with the case of having the only permeable member and not having the noise insulating wall, the resonance peak E of the low frequency heavy noise is almost at the same height. From this fact, it is seen that the larger is the distance width L, the larger is the effect of reducing the air sucking noise.
As shown, in the case of L=1 mm, comparing with a case of having the only permeable member and not having the noise insulating wall, the resonance peak F of the low frequency heavy noise is low by around 5 dB. In the case of L=10 mm, comparing with the case of having the only permeable member and not having the noise insulating wall, the resonance peak F of the low frequency heavy noise is low by around 5 dB. Only, in view of the whole of the frequency distributions, each of the resonance peaks is lower in L=1 mm than L=10 mm. From this fact, it is seen that the smaller is the distance width L, the larger is the effect of reducing the transmitting noise.
From
Accordingly, depending on the air intake apparatus 1 of this embodiment, not only the air sucking noise but also the transmitting noise can be controlled. By changing the separating width L, the air sucking noise and the transmitting noise may be best balanced. That is, it is sufficient that the separating width L is set at an optimum value, taking, for example, noise interrupting property in the engine room or clog preventing effect of the permeable member into consideration. The noise insulating wall 81 itself may be a permeable member of lower permeability than that of the permeable member arranged in the air cleaner case.
(3) Third Embodiment
A difference of this embodiment from the second embodiment is that the permeable member and the noise insulating wall are arranged at the dirty side case. Therefore, this difference will be referred to herein.
At first, explanation will be made to a structural difference of the intake apparatus of this embodiment.
Next, explanation will be made to effects of this embodied intake apparatus.
As shown, if disposing the permeable member, the resonance peak E of the low frequency heavy noise goes down. Practically, in case of t=1 mm, the resonance peak E lowers by about 5 dB, while in case of t=2 mm, it lowers by about 10 dB. From this fact, it is seen that the permeable member 8 has an almost equivalent effect of decreasing the resonance peak to that of the resonator. In view that the decreasing rate of the resonance peak E is larger in t=2 mm than t=1 mm, it is seen that the larger is the thickness of the permeable member, that is, the higher is the permeability of the permeable member, the larger is the resonance peak decreasing effect. Further, it is seen that the resonance peak decreasing effect is large in the low frequency range of in particular more than 30 Hz to less than 150 Hz. Also in the intake apparatus of this embodiment, the noise may be suppressed.
(4) Fourth Embodiment
A difference of this embodiment from the second embodiment is that the permeable member and the noise insulating wall are arranged in the vicinity of the downstream of the intake duct. Therefore, this difference will be referred to herein.
At first, explanation will be made to a structural difference of the intake apparatus of this embodiment.
Next, explanation will be made to effects of this embodied intake apparatus.
As shown, it is seen that if disposing the permeable member, the resonance peak E of the low frequency heavy noise goes down. Further, the larger is the thickness of the permeable member, that is, the higher is the permeability of the permeable member, the larger is the resonance peak decreasing effect. Further, it is seen that the resonance peak decreasing effect is large in the low frequency range of in particular more than 30 Hz to less than 150 Hz. Also in the air intake apparatus of this embodiment, the noise may be suppressed.
(5) Fifth Embodiment
Differences of this embodiment from the second embodiment are that the noise insulating wall is shaped in cup, and the noise insulating wall is equipped with control ribs for the noise insulating wall. Therefore, the differences will be referred to herein.
According to the embodiment, the noise insulating wall 81 is shaped in cup. Therefore, the noise insulating property is heightened. Further, the noise insulating wall 81 is equipped with control ribs 811 for the noise insulating wall. Thus, there is less possibility to generate noises by vibration of the noise insulating wall 81 itself.
(6) Sixth Embodiment
A difference of this embodiment from the fifth embodiment is that non-woven fabric layer is disposed on the inside of the cup of the noise insulating wall in substitution for the vibration ribs for the noise insulating wall. Therefore, the difference will be referred to herein.
According to this embodiment, the non-woven fabric layer 812 may lower the transmitting noise getting out from the permeable member 8. Thus, the transmitting noise decreasing effect is high.
In the following, explanation will be made to embodiments focusing on the air cleaner of the invention.
(7) Seventh Embodiment
At first, the air cleaner and the structure of the air intake system incorporated with d the air cleaner will be referred to. A schematic view of the air intake apparatus of the embodiment is shown in
The intake duct 3 has the same structure as that in FIG. 1.
The air cleaner 5 has the dirty side case 50, the clean side case 51, and the element 52.
The clean side case 51 is made of the resin, taking the box shape opening downward, mounted on the dirty side case 50 under a condition of turning over the opening, and projects a hose connecting cylinder 510 from a side wall 51 thereof.
The element 52 has the same structure as that in
Next, effects brought about by the air cleaner of the embodiment will be referred to.
As shown, in the case of L=1 mm, comparing with a case of having the only permeable member and not having the noise insulating wall, the resonance peak E of the low frequency heavy noise is high. In the case of L=10 mm, comparing with the case of having the only permeable member and not having the noise insulating wall, the resonance peak E of the low frequency heavy noise is almost at the same height. From this fact, it is seen that the larger is the distance width L, the larger is the effect of reducing the air-sucking noise.
As shown, in the case of L=1 mm, comparing with a case of having the only permeable member and not having the noise insulating wall part, the resonance peak F of the low frequency heavy noise is low by around 5 dB. In the case of L=10 mm, comparing with the case of having the only permeable member and not having the noise insulating wall, the resonance peak F of the low frequency heavy noise is low by around 5 dB. Only, in view of the whole of the frequency distributions, each of the resonance peaks is lower in L=1 mm than L=10 mm. From this fact, it is seen that the smaller is the distance width L, the larger is the effect of reducing the transmitting noise.
From
Thus, depending on the air cleaner 5 of this embodiment, not only the air sucking noise but also the transmitting noise can be controlled. By changing the separating width L, the air sucking noise and the transmitting noise may be best balanced. That is, it is sufficient that the separating width L is set at an optimum value, taking, for example, noise interrupting property in the engine room or clog preventing effect of the permeable member into consideration.
According to the air cleaner 5 of this embodiment, the noise insulating wall part 57 is displaced at the dirty side case 50. Therefore, even if dusts invade into the dirty side case 50 through the noise insulating wall part 57 and the permeable member 54, the dusts may be filtered through the element 52, so that the dusts are controlled from invasion in the downstream side after the interior of the clean side case 51.
According to the air cleaner 5 of this embodiment, the noise insulating wall part 57 is formed as one body with the dirty side case 50. Therefore, comparing with a case where the noise insulating wall part 57 is formed independently of the dirty side case 50 or the clean side case 51, parts may be reduced in number, and production cost may be saved. In addition, the structure of the air cleaner 5 itself is made simple.
(8) Eighth Embodiment
A difference of this embodiment from the seventh embodiment is that the bottom part of the dirty side case does not project. Therefore, this difference will be referred to herein.
(9) Ninth Embodiment
A difference of this embodiment from the seventh embodiment is that the noise insulating wall part is disposed in the clean side case. Therefore, this difference will be referred to herein.
Depending on the embodied air cleaner 5, by disposing the noise insulating wall part 57, dusts from the outside of the case may be suppressed from directly adhering the permeable member 54, so that the permeable member 54 is less to be clogged by dusts in the sucked air.
(10) Other
As above mentioned, the explanations have been made to the practiced embodiments of the air intake apparatus and the air cleaner according to the invention. However, embodiments to be reduced to practice are by no means limited to the above mentioned modes, but may be served under various deformations or improved modifications made by those skilled in the technical field.
For example, in the above embodiments, the permeable member is disposed in the vicinity of the downstream of the air cleaner or the intake duct. However, in case other members correspond to the antinode region of the resonance mode of the standing wave, the permeable member may be arranged at, e.g., other members such as the air cleaner hose.
In addition, in the above embodiments, the single permeable member is disposed in the vicinity of the downstream of the air cleaner or the intake duct. However, a plurality of permeable members may be arranged in combination.
Further, in the above embodiments, the permeable member made of PET non-woven fabric is arranged. But, such permeable members are available as PP non-woven fabric, filter paper, or foaming resins as polyurethane foamed substance, polyethylene foamed substance, or polyvinylchloride foamed substance. In the third embodiment, if the air cleaner is mounted on the upper face of the cylinder head of the engine, the upper wall of the cylinder head may be utilized as the noise insulating wall. Then, the members are reduced in number.
In addition, the position, the number, or the shape of the communicating holes 530 are not especially limited in the noise insulating wall part 57. Only, desirably, the communicating holes 530 are disposed at the side wall part of the noise insulating wall part 57. The communicating holes 530 may be made by forming at the same time as the noise insulating wall part 53, or may be made by boring process in the formed noise insulating wall part 57.
It is preferable to determine the total air flow rate passing the communicating holes 530 to be larger than that passing the permeable member 54. The noise insulating wall part 57 may be set at both of the dirty side case 50 and the clean side case 51.
In addition, although the aforementioned various embodiments are explained independently, characteristics of each embodiment may be combined as freely as possible.
According to the invention, it is possible to offer the intake apparatus enabling miniaturization, to secure the desired engine output, and to suppress the noise. In accordance with the invention, it is possible to provide such an air cleaner, enabling to suppress not only air suction noise but also air transmitting noise and decrease the number of parts.
Although the invention has been described in its preferred form with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure of the preferred form can be changed in the details of construction and in the combination and arrangement of parts without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2002-141978 | May 2002 | JP | national |
2002-200361 | Jul 2002 | JP | national |
The present application is a division of application Ser. No. 10/438,935 filed on May 16, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,107,959 which is based on Japanese Patent Application Nos. 2002-141978 and 2002-200361, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4538556 | Takeda | Sep 1985 | A |
4539947 | Sawada et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
5002021 | Nakata et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5333576 | Verkleeren | Aug 1994 | A |
6155224 | Akihisa et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6205968 | Spannbauer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6386317 | Morohoshi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6494290 | Jessberger | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517595 | Kino et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6530984 | Stuart | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6609489 | Slopsema et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622680 | Kino et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6705267 | Westerbeke et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
20030062013 | Kino et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
A-2-118-245 | Oct 1983 | GB |
A-2000-110682 | Apr 2000 | JP |
A-2000-205068 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-220539 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001-193587 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002-106431 | Jan 2002 | JP |
A-2002-021660 | Jan 2002 | JP |
A-2002-21660 | Jan 2002 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050173186 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10438935 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 11098450 | US |