This application is a National Stage Application of PCT/IB2009/050732, filed 24 Feb. 2009, which claims benefit of Ser. No. TO2008A000142, filed 28 Feb. 2008 in Italy and which applications are incorporated herein by reference. To the extent appropriate, a claim of priority is made to each of the above disclosed applications.
The present invention relates generally to an air intake and more particularly to an air intake for an aircraft chaff dispenser.
Typically an aircraft chaff dispenser includes:
The packets of chaff ejected from the rear of the dispenser “explode” as a result of the air striking them and thus disperse the chaff into the air wake of the aircraft.
The main problem affecting the known aircraft chaff dispenser consists in that a negative pressure gradient is created between the front part of the housing (in which the driving mechanism is received) and the rear part of the housing (in which the packets of chaff are received and from which they are ejected), which negative pressure gradient causes the chaff ejected from the chaff dispenser to be sucked back into or recirculated inside it, with a consequent risk of faults both of a mechanical nature, such as seizing of the driving mechanism, and of an electronic nature, in particular problems of electromagnetic interference with the electronic control circuits of the dispenser and with the remaining aircraft defence circuitry and sensor equipment mounted on the housing of the dispenser. In order to overcome this problem it is known to provide air intakes on the front of the side walls of the dispenser housing, so as to increase the pressure at the front of the housing. The presence of lateral air intakes involves, however, the risk that the gases emitted by the missiles launched by the aircraft enter inside the dispenser and hit the packets of chaff contained inside it, damaging them irremediably and therefore negatively affecting the defence capacity of the aircraft.
The object of the present invention is therefore to provide an air intake which is able to overcome the drawbacks of the prior art discussed above.
By virtue of the fact that the air intake comprises a through-hole formed in a wall of a housing and a fence which is suitably shaped and suitably spaced from the hole, the pressure increase effect is maximized in the part of the housing in which the air intake is provided. If such an air intake is mounted on the front of the side walls of the housing of an aircraft chaff dispenser, the risk of the packets of chaff being sucked back into or recirculated inside the dispenser is therefore minimized and at the same time the risk of entry of the gases emitted by the missiles launched by the aircraft and therefore of damage to the packets of chaff contained inside the dispenser is minimized.
Moreover, owing to the small height of the fences of the lateral air intakes, both the aerodynamic drag and the radar visibility of the dispenser are reduced.
The characteristics and advantages of the invention will result more clearly from the following detailed description provided purely by way of non-limiting example, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
With reference initially to
The housing 12 has preferably a square or rectangular cross-section with a pair of vertical side walls 14 (only one of which is shown in the figures), in the front part of which (left-hand side when viewing
The shape of the fence 20 in the form of a horizontally lying V has the effect of causing the air flow to stop at the total pressure in the zone of the vertex of the V and therefore increasing the pressure at the front of the housing 12 of the dispenser, with consequent minimization of the risks of the ejected packets of chaff being sucked back inside the housing.
During tests it has been found that the best compromise between the need to supply air to the front of the dispenser housing in order to ensure a positive pressure gradient between the front and rear of the dispenser housing and the need to prevent entry of the gases emitted by the missiles launched by the aircraft and the consequent damage to the packets of chaff contained inside the dispenser is obtained by suitably defining the geometric characteristics of the lateral air intakes 16. In particular, it has been found that the geometric characteristics which most influence the performance of the lateral air intakes 16 are the three parameters indicated above, i.e. the diameter d of the hole 18, the distance 1 between the vertex of the fence 20 and the centre of the hole 18 and the height h of the fence 20 at its vertex. These parameters must be linked to each other by the following mutual relationships: the ratio h/1 must be between 0.8 and 1, while the ratio h/d must be between 1.5 and 2, with a diameter d between 8 and 12 mm. In the embodiment shown in
While the housing 12 of the chaff dispenser 10 is made of metallic material, the fences 20 are preferably made of plastic (allowing the weight of the dispenser to be kept low) and fixed to the housing 12 by means of gluing.
Naturally, the principle of the invention remaining unchanged, the embodiments and the constructional details may be widely varied with respect to those described and illustrated purely by way of non-limiting example, without thereby departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the accompanying claims.
For example, although the invention has been described and illustrated with reference to application of the air intakes to an aircraft chaff dispenser, it is clear that the invention is applicable to any housing in which the pressure must be increased by the flow of air through an air intake, while minimizing at the same time the entry of external air.
As regards more specifically the shape of the air intake, the hole 18 may have a shape other than a circular shape, in particular a polygonal shape which can be traced around a circumference, in which case the abovementioned diameter d is the diameter of the circumference inscribed within the polygonal perimeter of the hole.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
TO2008A0142 | Feb 2008 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2009/050732 | 2/24/2009 | WO | 00 | 8/26/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/107058 | 9/3/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2694357 | Lee | Nov 1954 | A |
2954948 | Johnson | Oct 1960 | A |
3099423 | Wilde et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
3578264 | Kuethe | May 1971 | A |
4095761 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4167008 | Blickenstaff | Sep 1979 | A |
4203566 | Lord | May 1980 | A |
4343506 | Saltzman | Aug 1982 | A |
4417709 | Fehrm | Nov 1983 | A |
4696442 | Mazzitelli | Sep 1987 | A |
4836473 | Aulehla et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5058837 | Wheeler | Oct 1991 | A |
5271523 | Nasvall et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5598990 | Farokhi et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5841079 | Parente | Nov 1998 | A |
6079667 | Gruensfelder | Jun 2000 | A |
6105904 | Lisy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6142417 | Figge, Sr. | Nov 2000 | A |
6247668 | Reysa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6349899 | Ralston | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6485093 | Reivers | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6527224 | Seidel | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6619178 | Fransson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6837465 | Lisy et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7334760 | Lisy et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7344107 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7469545 | Riley | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7600713 | Hein et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7600714 | Sheoran et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611093 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624944 | Parikh et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7665694 | Hein et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7849702 | Parikh | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7861968 | Parikh et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7975961 | Silkey et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8172178 | Bonnaud et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8256706 | Smith et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
20020134886 | Seidel | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20050204910 | Padan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060102779 | Campbell et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060163425 | Brown et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060196993 | Hein et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080099630 | Parikh et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080099631 | Parikh et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080179466 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080203218 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
779 655 | Apr 1935 | FR |
Entry |
---|
“Reducing aircraft drag by drilling holes in wings”, Design Engineering, Morgan-Grampian Ltd., London, GB, Mar. 1, 1995, p. 14. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100327117 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |