AIR PLASMA INDUCED LOW METAL LOSS

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20080136069
  • Publication Number
    20080136069
  • Date Filed
    October 11, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Published
    June 12, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
Even a very small amount of air plasma can reduce the dross during melting. A method and device is shown, whereby substantial saving in the cost of melting aluminum and the energy to melt aluminum is possible by the technique of introducing a small amount of air plasma in the melting environment. In this manner even though the air contains oxygen, and the common practice is presently directed at air being eliminated from the melting environment, an air plasma is able to very effectively be utilized.
Description
PATENTS CITED IN TEXT

U.S. Pat. No. 5,963,709 and pending patent application Ser. No. 10/725,6161


Other US Patents

U.S. Pat. No. 3,648,015.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,403,453.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,387,842.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,414,324.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,972.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,669,583.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,938,854.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,146,724.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,245,132.


Application:

The general physical and chemical characteristics of molten aluminum include: Aluminum melts combine with oxygen, moisture, or other oxidizing materials to form dross, and the tendency and ease with which this dross can be entrained in the melt affects the casting made from the melt. Other factors which affect the casting made from aluminum and its alloys are, the readiness with which the melt will absorb nascent hydrogen, and the evolution of hydrogen during solidification of the casting to form porosity (the principal source of hydrogen is moisture from the products of gas/oil combustion); the 3.5 to 8.5% contraction in volume which occurs when the melt solidifies and the low density of molten aluminum which results in low hydrostatic pressure in the mold. Good founding practice begins with good melting practice which is almost always dependent on the type of melt casting furnace used. As will be noted in the sections below the use of any electrically operated system for the melting of aluminum impacts favorably on dross formation as electrically heated systems minimize convection. When the aluminum melts react with the atmosphere or moisture, a dross of aluminum oxide and nitride is formed, which contains some mechanically entrained gas and metal. Since the dross is wetted by the aluminum melt and has about the same density, it often becomes entrained in the melt during melting, handling, or casting, and does not readily separate at the surface of the melt. It is commonly believed that the quantity of dross formed during melting increases with 1) the use of fine or badly weathered or corroded scrap; 2) the presence of magnesium in the alloys in the charge; 3) the increase in turbulence (such as from induction melting) which breaks the protective oxide surface of the melt in the furnace; and 4) the increase in the temperature of gases specially air and oxygen in contact with the surface. The oxide on the melt surface contains a considerable amount of liquid metal, causing the dross layer to be “wet.” Common experience has it therefore that high temperatures cause more dross and that wet dross is increased also by a higher temperature of melting. The melting/casting furnaces presently used in the aluminum industry can typically be classified into three types depending on the source to power the same. These are resistance-heated furnaces, induction-heated furnaces, and gas- or oil-fired furnaces. The common types and their advantages are tested in Table 1. Although each type of the existing melt furnaces have some advantages, they all suffer from several general drawbacks, namely high energy cost, high dross, harmful gas generation, low quality aluminum, and high operational noise, as individually discussed below:

    • Resistance-heated furnace—The resistor elements are inserted in protection tubes or otherwise suspended and installed in the furnace lining with heat transfer to the metal by radiation. The general temperature of operation of these furnaces is between 700 and 1000 C. The heating elements used are generally made of metallic wires (max temperature that these can normally reach is about 1050 C) or silicon carbide (maximum temperature they can reach is about 1500 C). Nevertheless the normal use of electric furnace to melt or contain aluminum is about 700 to 800 C. The costs for investment, maintenance, and operation of this type of furnace are high because of the cost of electricity and when silicon carbide elements are used which frequently are imbalanced because of aging.
    • Induction-heated furnaces—In addition to energy inefficiency, induction furnace are generally characterized by high maintenance and labor costs and therefore, the use of this kind of furnace is usually limited only to some very special applications. Induction furnaces also cause churning of the liquid leading to oxide (dross) inclusions. There is also a growing concern about electromagnetic fields (EMF) in the workplace. However, this issue remains controversial. Again when using induction furnaces the melt is kept at about 700 to 800 C.
    • Gas- or oil-fired furnaces—This type of furnace is more energy inefficient than the other two types of furnaces because of uncontrolled combustion flames inside the furnace. All gas- or oil-fired furnaces suffer from high noise due to the burning explosive process and serious environmental problem due to the release of harmful combustion product gases such as PAH, soot, sulfur dioxide, NOx, and CO. In addition, this type of furnace usually has low recovery rated because air is allowed into the furnace for the operation of the gas/oil burners which results in severe melt loss due to oxidation. Moisture in the gas often leads to hydrogen pick up in the melt.









TABLE 1







Typical operating parameters of common aluminum furnaces.











Dross
Energy Efficiency
Capital Cost














Indirect Fixed Crucible
5-15%
7-17%
low


Electric Induction
5-10%
low
Very high


Direct Flame
5-15%
Very low
Very low


Electric radiant
2-6%
70%
Medium


Sloping Dry Hearth
5-15%
18%
Medium









It is clearly noted from the chart above that conventional radiant electric heating is the most efficient and clean method of heating. The total metal melt loss in dross could be as high as 80% of the dross weight. In radiant rod furnaces, electric currents of up to 4000 to 5000 amperes are commonly used to heat silicon carbide resistance elements which radiate to the furnace load and walls (note however as described above such elements are not the most optimal). These furnaces are made to oscillate, thereby facilitating conduction to the melt from the furnace walls. Radiant rod furnaces require relatively low investment cost, but are primarily being used as holding furnace. Operating costs are impacted by dross formation and energy usage. Typical dross loss


The result of reduced dross is significant from our experiments. We find that even a small amount of air plasma in an aluminum heating furnace can substantially reduce dross.


It is common knowledge that nitrogen gas is used as a cover to reduce the oxidation (dross formation). There are several technologies which are also used to recover aluminum from dross by re-melting and cleaning means. Our invention will make possible substantial savings in melting costs because Nitrogen a gas often used during melting or holding aluminum to melt aluminum can be eliminated. The dross is often reclaimed by re-melting thus incurring energy and productivity penalties. Thus by using our invention the energy costs are reduced for aluminum processing and the productivity of aluminum melting can be enhanced. We anticipate that the product of the invention can be used to separate debris from aluminum where the debris can be sprues or dross or other contaminants.


EXPERIMENT # 1















Equipment:
(H23) Total 23 kW


Heating Elements:
Molybdenum disilicide


Plsama Airtorch ™ #:
BR


Power Rating:
10.0 KW


Inlet input to Plasma Airtorch ™:
Compressed air, ~3-4 CFM.


Exit dia of Plasma Airtorch ™:
¾″ diameter × 0.5″ length



exit nozzle


Target:
Furnace pouring spout/launder


Material of the Charge:
356 Aluminum alloy ingot



{Tliquidus = 615 C., Tsolidus = 555 C.}


Weight of Charge:
33 + 6 + 12.5 = 51.5 pounds

























Furnace temperature,






° C.
Furnace current,

Observations: Time



(B-type sensors)
Amps
Airtorch, ° C.
of start and finish













Time
Process
Over temp.
Primary
Secondary
(K-sensor)
pouring.
















3:08
RT
RT
0
0
RT



3:09
RT
RT
15.5
48.9
RT


3:45
RT
RT
23
75
RT
Start-up door opened


3:50
37

33
73
RT


3:55
94

37
84
RT
13.3 V, 71 A;








Increased from 45 to








50% power


4:00
198

36
84
RT


4:05
203

21
62


4:10
199

20
54
RT


4:15
201

18
51
RT


4:20
228

19
63
RT
60% power


4:25
254

22.9
76
RT


4:30
324

30
94
RT
Red glow started;








65% power


4:35
370

31
96
RT


4:40
400

31
97
RT


4:45
400

39
93
120


4:50
400

37
86
342


4:55
430

37
117
527
80% power;








SV = 1500 C., door








closed


5:00
541

49
151
682
100% power,








Pri = 188 V, Output








dropped to 95%


5:05
642

47
46
728


5:10
696

47
148
700


5:15
753

48
151
679


5:20
794
781
49
153
674


5:25
836
823
50
155
672


5:30
875
864
50
157
659
Soft metal


5:35
902
892
51
159
661
Soft; Gap bottom








closing


5:40
918
990
51
160
1019
Little quantity








dripped into








crucible. Shiny








liquid


5:42
923
918
52
161
1081
Metal started








pouring semi-








continuously








(shiny).


5:45
930
926
52
162
1123
Metal pouring








droplets;


5:47
940
935
50
155
1157
More close to








continuous pouring;








92% power


5:48
944
941
50
154
1173
Continuous pouring


5:50
954
951
50
156
1181
Continuous pouring


5:52
980
977
51
159
1188
Continuous pouring


5:54
1079
1080
50
156
1201
Stopped pouring


5:57
1142
1139
50
155
802
Door opened


5:59
1006
993



New ingot of 12.5








pounds charged


6:00
994
987
51
156
650
One more ingot of 6








pounds charged


6:00:30





Door closed


6:02
952
962
50
155
820
Heating


6:05
952
967
50
155
996
Heating; Click noise








twice inside furnace


6:10
980
993
51
158
1075
Tr. Hot; Two








droplets fell.


6:12
996
1010
52
161
1097
Metal pouring semi-








continuously


6:15
1013
1027
52
160
1106
Metal pouring more








continuously


6:17
1029
1039
51
160
1114
Metal pouring more








continuously


6:18
1040
1047
51
159
1117
Continuous almost


6:20
1052
1059
51
158
1119
Continuous almost


6:25
1091
1111
50
156
1125
Continuous almost


6:27
1101
1099



Door opened;








Furnace shutdown





Results:


Weight of dross = 200 grams.


Metal is shiny.


% Dross = 0.855






EXPERIMENT # 2















Equipment:
(H23) Total 23 kW


Heating Elements:
Molybdenum disilicide


Plasma Airtorch ™ #:
BR Power rating: 10.0 KW


Inlet Input to Plasma Airtorch ™:
Compressed air, ~3-4 CFM.


Exit:
¾″ diameter × 0.5″


Target:
Furnace pouring spout/launder


Material of the Charge:
Aluminum alloy ingot


Weight of Charge:
35 pounds

























Furnace temperature,






° C.
Furnace current,

Observations: Time



(B-type sensors)
Amps
Airtorch, ° C.
of start and finish













Time
Process
Over temp.
Primary
Secondary
(K-sensor)
pouring.





1:24
1500




Ingot charged into








furnace; ~1 minute








for loading


1:25
1200


1:30
1034


1:35
1007




Beginning to sag


1:40
1026




Began to flow; Slow








dripping








Furnace opened








brifely


1:45
1016



−900
Steady flow just








starting


1:48
1022




Good flow rate;








Steady stream


1:50
1059




Flow slowing -








ready to stop








flowing





Weight of dross = 134 grams. Metal is shiny.


% Dross = 0.84


Cumulative weight of dross of 2 melts (33 + 6 + 12.5 + 35 pounds) = 334 grams.


Cumulative % dross = 0.850






EXPERIMENT # 3















Equipment:
(H23) Total 23 kW


Heating Elements
Molybdenum diSilicide


Plasma Airtorch ™ #:
BR Power rating: 10.0 KW


Inlet Input to Plasma Airtorch ™:
Compressed air, ~3-4 CFM.


Exit:
¾″ diameter × 0.5″


Target:
Furnace pouring spout/launder


Material of the Charge:
Aluminum alloy ingot


Weight of Charge:
17 + 17.5 = 34.5 pounds

























Furnace temperature,






° C.
Furnace current,

Observations: Time



(B-type sensors)
Amps
Airtorch, ° C.
of start and finish













Time
Process
Over temp.
Primary
Secondary
(K-sensor)
pouring.
















3:15

590



Furnace started &




flashing



slowly taken to








1500 C.


3:30
1500
766
46.5

415
Ingot charged


3:32
1400
709
52

475
Some smoking


3:45
750
674
51.9

650
Controller confg








changed from K to B








type


3:50
808
729
53.3


Smoking door area


3:55
893
803
54.6


4:00
935
841
56.4

669
Melting


4:04
955
857
56.6

658
Dripping to flow


4:10
996
900
57


Starting to pour;








Good flow.


4:15
1074
981
55.3


Flow stopped








Aim: Take melter to








1500 C. and charge








new ingot;


4:58
1500
1411
47.8

772
17.5 pound Ingot








charged


5:00
1320
1187
51.8

775


5:08
1234
1085
53.1


First drip


5:10
1228
1079
52.9


Flowing steady


5:13
1279
1129
52.0


Flow slowing


5:14
1330
1200
50.9


Flow stopped





Weight of dross = 180 grams.


Metal is shiny.


% Dross = 1.149%






EXPERIMENT #4















Equipment:
(H23) Total 23 kW


Plasma Airtorch ™ #:
BR Power rating: 10.0 KW


Inlet Input to Plasma Airtorch ™:
Compressed air, ~3-4 CFM.


Exit:
¾″ diameter × 0.5″


Target:
Furnace pouring spout/launder


Material of the Charge:
356 Aluminum alloy ingot



{Tliquidus = 615 C., Tsolidus = 555 C.}


Weight of Charge:
33.5 Pounds

























Furnace temperature,






° C.
Furnace current,

Observations: Time



(B-type sensors)
Amps
Airtorch, ° C.
of start and finish













Time
Process
Over temp.
Primary
Secondary
(K-sensor)
pouring.
















10:25
274




Start up


10:35
444

31.0
131
784


10:48
743
749
421
123
799


10:55
920
924
45.8
122
814


11:10
1100
1103
39.7
115
821
Hold


11:25
1103
1103
33.1
90.7
822


11:55
1150
1150
31.2
146
822


12:05
1280
1254
44
111
822


12:10
1331


150


 1:03
1065
1081



Ingot charged


 1:14
1088
1100



Steady flow


 1:20
1077
1093



Steady flow


 1:25
1079




Stopped flow





Weight of dross = 400 grams (for expt # 4 & 5: 34 + 17.5 + 35.5 = 87 pounds total charge)


% Dross = 1.013.


Metal is shiny.






EXPERIMENT # 5















Equipment:
H23) Total 23 kW


Plasma Airtorch ™ #:
BR Power rating: 10.0 KW


Inlet Input to Plasma Airtorch ™:
Compressed air, ~3-4 CFM.


Exit:
¾″ diameter × 0.5″


Target:
Furnace pouring spout/launder


Material of the Charge:
380 Aluminum alloy ingot.


Weight of Charge:
27.5 pounds

























Furnace temperature,






° C.
Furnace current,

Observations: Time



(B-type sensors)
Amps
Airtorch, ° C.
of start and finish













Time
Process
Over temp.
Primary
Secondary
(K-sensor)
pouring.
















11:25
690

40
118
669



11:30
830

40
124


11:36
915

53
152
719


11:40
1000

55
159
719


11:45
1020

42
125
719


11:50
1045

42
121
722


11:55
1085

43
123
722


12:15
1125

35
102
722


12:30
1200

38
105
725


12:35
1265

46
133
724


12:40
1331

47
133
728


 1:05
1480

47
134
645


 1:10
1500

47
130
742


 1:20
1550


 1:25
1060

44
124
796
27.5 pounds ingot








charged


 1:30
1053

43
125

First drips


 1:35
1061

43
125

Steady drips


 1:37
1065

43
125
787
Steady stream


 1:39
1070

43
125
787
Stopped; Shutdown





Weight of dross = 125 grams.


Metal is shiny.


% Dross = 1.001%






EXPERIMENT # 6


















Equipment:
(H23) Total 23 kW



Plasma Airtorch ™ #:
BR Power rating: 10.0 KW



Inlet Input to Plasma Airtorch ™:
Compressed air, ~3-4 CFM.



Exit:
¾″ diameter × 0.5″



Target:
Furnace pouring spout/launder



Material of the Charge:
Copper



Weight of Charge:
1.35 pounds


























Furnace temperature,






° C.
Furnace current,

Observations: Time



(B-type sensors)
Amps
Airtorch, ° C.
of start and finish













Time
Process
Over temp.
Primary
Secondary
(K-sensor)
pouring.
















 9:22
RT

41


1600 C./1.5 h


 9:25
70

36


 9:30
164

38


 9:35
265

32


 9:40
339

28


 9:46
464

39


1600 C./1 hr


 9:50
600

46


 9:55
741

48


 9:57
822




Shutdown


10:15





Re-started


10:20
432

26


10:25
504

27


10:30
563
608
35


10:36
650
698
33


10:40
701
750
39


10:45
768
821
34


10:50
836
893
39


10:55
897
959
39


11:00
971
1034
38


11:09
1092
1157
40


11:15
1176
1243
50


11:20
1237
1307
49.5


11:25
1286
1356
49


11:27





Furnace shutdown








due to OVT SP was








at 1350; reset to








1720 C.


11:31
1099
1172
23


11:35
1158
1229
32


11:45
1297
1365
41


11:50
1361
1432
47


11:56
1419
1487
46


12:01
1452
525
46


12:05
1474
1548
45.1


12:10
1501
1577
45.1


12:29
1571
1656
44


12:35
1581
1673
44


12:40
1594
1684
44


12:43
1600
1689
40


12:47:00
1600
1690
40


1.35 pound ingot








charged


12:48:22





Started








pouring/leaking


12:48
1507
1611


12:49:00





Completed pouring


12:52
1569
1661



Shutdown


 1:53
1395
1475
47


Re-started for next








melt


 2:02
1453
1538
46


 2:15
1507
1600
45


 2:28
1542
1635
44


 2:40
1565
1667
44


 2:45
1577
1677
44


 3:01:00 to 3:01:30
1600
1701
43


5.0 pounds Cu ingot








charged in 30








seconds


 3;04:00
1459


 3:03:30





Pouring began








(Molten metal








leaked from bottom








hearth)









Summary of Rapid Copper Melting:





















Time for


Furnace temp,





melting
Time for
Furnace temp.
after charging




Time for
(beginning of
complete
at the time of
& closing


Run #
Charge, lbs
charging, M:S
pouring), M:S
pouring, M:S
charging, C.
door, C.







1
1:35
0:20
1:22 
0.38
1600
1507


2
5:00
0:30
2:00*

1600
1459





*Molten metal leaked through the hearth. Dross Very Low. Shiny.






From the results and the table 2 we note that in addition to dross reduction the energy and time required to melt aluminum is also low when even a small amount of air plasma is present. The heat transfer coefficient may have been increased because of the presence of even small amounts of plasma. In our experiments we estimate that that at least 5% of the total heat came from the plasma generator.


Most importantly the dross content is reduced substantially which is an unusual result and totally unexpected from common wisdom which is that as the temperature is higher then the dross increases especially in the presence of hot air. The reason for the low dross, we suspect possibly comes from the air nitrogen becoming partially ionized. However, this reasoning is only a speculation at this stage. Normally it would be expected that an Airtorch™ enhanced melting which uses hot air (i.e. hot oxygen) would show high dross but the experiments all appear to indicate that the dross in reality reduced substantially. As discussed below this is thought to occur because of the plasma content in the air, albeit small.


The surface of a metallic part especially if the surface is electrically conducting, i.e. where electrons are available in abundance, may give up electrons to the air plasma and also produce heat according to the reaction:





2N++2e=2N+E (approximately 1480 kJ/mole)





2N=N2+E


This is a manner in which nitrogen and heat automatically could be thought to deposit on the surface of aluminum thus increasing the energy transfer rate substantially as well as providing a cover of nitrogen gas which prevents oxidation. Typically ˜1 CFM of air plasma contains in excess of 1023 atoms and one percent ionization leads to nearly 1022 ions which can easily produce a layers of inert (non oxygen containing) atoms after absorbing electrons from the solid or liquid metal surface. The air plasma is expected to be mostly nitrogen plasma although the presence of oxygen plasma may not be ruled out because the first ionization energies of nitrogen and oxygen are very similar.


EXPERIMENT #7

A Plasma Airtorch™ with a ¾″ diameter nozzle system was used for melting small pieces of aluminum with the sample in proximity with the hot air plasma atmosphere generated by the Airtorch. During solidification and cooling the plasma Airtorch was powered down slowly. The melted and solidified product looked clean. The clean melt and resultant clean surface solid is presumably because of the ionized plasma which protected the aluminum from large oxidation even though the atmosphere contained mostly air. This is an example which shows that a air plasma can be used by itself providing all the heat required to melt aluminum.


The melting or holding environment comprises of the total atmosphere in the melting or holding device. When the plasma generator is a device of the type displayed in FIG. 2 (products of U.S. Pat. No. 5,963,709 and pending patent application Ser. No. 10/725,6161) the device can be retrofitted to any metal processing system such as a launder or flowing metal channels or molten metal pumps.


The typical devices which may used with the element to melt or contain liquid metal are furnaces (batch, continuous, holding, melting), crucibles, laddles, launder systems (channels for moving liquid metals), holding furnaces, melting furnaces, casting furnaces, transportation vessels for molten metals and other similar equipment.


EXPERIMENT #8

Several small batches about 50 gms of Aluminum alloy 356 were melted in different configurations for a comparative study of the melting surface on resolidification. One batch was heated with a Plasma Airtorch™. The result is shown as (A) in FIG. 1 (a composite photograph). A similar melt was made by heating a small quantity of aluminum in a regular metallic wire furnace with an air environment. Yet another sample was heated in a propane torch gas heating environment atmosphere. All the melts were made in a crucible and after the melts solidified, the aluminum was removed from the crucible by tilting the crucible and allowing the solid to fall out. Notice how much more shiny (A) is compared to the other two clearly indicating that the molybdenum disilicide melted material had low dross and was clean. The metal in (A) slid out much more easily from the crucible. The data conclusively indicates that the use of an Air Plasma in the heater configuration reduces the dross content and the metal loss in the dross. Air contains both nitrogen and oxygen as the predominant gasses. An air plasma is one that contains a nitrogen ions and electrons. Our experiments indicate that even a very small amount of air plasma in the air can substantially reduce the dross.


A typical device in which the method of air plasma melting can be done is shown in FIG. 2. In this device aluminum charge is introduced from one end into a chamber which has heating elements and a plasma Airtorch is placed on top. The chamber now has the environment of an air plasma. Clean liquid metal is discharged from the other end (i.e. a liquid with low dross content).


An air plasma can be created by the products of U.S. Pat. No. 5,963,709 and pending patent application Ser. No. 10/725,6161 (herein incorporated fully). Small amounts of thermal plasma may also be created in very high temperature environments. Very small amounts of thermal ionization are possible by high temperature heating elements such as molybdenum, tungsten and molybdenum disilicide materials. The type of useful plasma for the invention is one which can be employed at normal or high pressure as opposed to very low pressure plasma. Plasma can also created by RF means U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,648,015, 5,403,453, 5,387,842, 5,414,324, 5,456,972, 5,669,583, 5,938,854, 6,146,724, 6,245,132 all incorporated herein. Not all techniques can produce Air Plasma at normal pressures and not all techniques except for U.S. Pat. No. 5,963,709 and Ser. No. 10/725,6161 can be considered to produce substantial heat. Unless an air plasma is used, the cost benefits to melting aluminum from using air instead of a gas like nitrogen, helium or argon are difficult to realize. Of course gas plasmas may also be employed and their use is anticipated.


The best mode appears to be the use of even a small amount even as low as 0.5-1% (of the total environment) of air plasma in any existing or specially constructed device which holds or melts molten aluminum. In this manner even though the air contains oxygen and common practice would involve hot oxygen being removed from the environment, an air plasma is able to very effectively utilize hot air and yet provide beneficial melting. The environment also protects against oxidation in the solid cool down or solid heat up stage.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1. This is a color photograph (composite photograph). Samples A, B and C represent solidified melts of aluminum alloy 356 after melting and solidification. Note sample A is much more shiny than sample B or sample C. Sample A was melted using a Plasma Airtorch placed above a crucible containing the initial solid sample. Sample B was melted by placing in crucible and melting carried out conventionally with a wire wound electric heater furnace (max temperature 1000 C) and sample C was melted with a gas torch heater. Note, the shiny surface of sample A indicates less of an oxidized surface i.e. the clear difference in the oxide/dross levels. The samples B and C have clear wrinkled and non-shiny oxidized surfaces.



FIG. 2 shows a aluminum melting device consisting of a furnace box with stand 1.1, for melting and collecting liquid metal 1.2 in a crucible 1.3, through a pouring spout 1.4. The furnace environment is contained in the refractories (insulation) 1.5. Molybdenum disilicide heating elements 1.6 and the plasma Airtorches (plasma generator) 1.7 provide heat to the charge introduced from the port 1.10. The plasma and hot air from the plasma generator 1.7 arrive at the charge through a port 1.9. The Plasma generators 1.7 are held to the main furnace body by clamps 1.8. The metal charge 1.11 is introduced through the port 1.10 which can rotate (with the help of a motor 1.12). The molten metal 1.2 and any separated impurity (for example a entrained sprue filter) 1.13 are collected as shown. In this embodiment of the invention three plasma generators 1.7 are shown.





GLOSSARY

Charge: The ingot, or other parts made of metal which are melted or heated. The charge can include ingots, cut pieces of metal, metal chips, or metal waste, or mixed debris and metal.


Melting: All processes involving partial or fully molten metal whether in containment, direct melting or transfer configurations.


Dross: Oxide and complex oxide scale(s) formed on molten aluminum or other metals which can additionally contain trapped metal as well as fluxes.


Air-Plasma: The plasma obtained from the ionization of air. The air plasma may contain substantially hot air and a percentage of ionized air gases.

Claims
  • 1-10. (canceled)
  • 11. An apparatus for processing a metal comprising: a receptacle for containing the metal; andat least one plasma arrangement configured to provide a combination of a heated gas and an ionized gas over a free surface of the metal,wherein, when the plasma arrangement provides the combination over the free surface, a dross that is formed when an entire charge of the metal is melted comprises less than about 3% by weight of the entire charge.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the combination provides at least about five percent of the total heat used for melting of the entire charge.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the receptacle comprises a heating arrangement configured to provide heat to the entire charge.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the heating arrangement comprises a plurality of resistance heating elements.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the resistance heating elements comprise molybdenum disilicide.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the heated gas is air.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the heated gas comprises oxygen.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the combination comprises a small amount of the ionized gases.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the combination comprises less than about 1% of the ionized gases.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the combination comprises between about 0.5% and about 1% of the ionized gases.
  • 21. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the metal comprises aluminum.
  • 22. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the receptacle comprises at least one of a launder system or a molten metal transportation vessel.
  • 23. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the at least one plasma arrangement comprises a plurality of plasma arrangements.
  • 24. The apparatus of claim 11, further comprising an enclosure configured to provide an enclosed region above the receptacle, wherein the combination is provided into the enclosed region.
  • 25. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the receptacle comprises at least one of a furnace, a crucible, a holding furnace, a melting furnace, or a casting furnace.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10969053 Oct 2004 US
Child 11870591 US