The present invention relates to an air pollution control system and an air pollution control method both of which are for a coal combustion boiler that reduces mercury contained in flue gas from the boiler.
Due to the fact that flue gas emitted from a boiler, such as one that is a combustor in a thermal power plant, for example, contains highly toxic mercury, various systems for reducing mercury contained in the flue gas have been developed.
A boiler typically includes a wet-type desulfurizer for reducing sulfur contained in the flue gas. It is widely known that, in a flue gas control facility including such a boiler having the desulfurizer provided thereto as an air pollution control apparatus, if the amount of chlorine (Cl) contained in the flue gas increases, the ratio of divalent metallic mercury that is water soluble increases, and the desulfurizer can collect mercury more easily.
Various inventions related to a method or an apparatus for controlling metallic mercury by combining a NOx removing apparatus that removes NOx and the wet-type desulfurizer that uses an alkali absorbent as a SOx absorbent have been devised recently (Patent Document 1).
A reducing method using an adsorbent such as activated carbon or a selenium filter is commonly known as a method for controlling metallic mercury contained in flue gas. However, because such a method requires a special adsorbing-reducing unit, the method is not suited for controlling a large volume of flue gas from a power plant, for example.
As a method for controlling metallic mercury contained in a large volume of flue gas, a limestone-gypsum method using a gas-liquid contact type desulfurizer has been widely employed as a method for reducing SOx through reactions expressed by formulas (1) and (2) below:
SO2+CaCO3+1/2H2O→CaSO3.1/2H2O+CO2 (absorption) (1)
CaSO3.1/2H2O+3/2H2O+1/2O2→CaSO4.2H2O (oxidization) (2)
[Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Laid-open No. 2007-7612
In the gas-liquid contact type desulfurizer, mercury oxide (Hg2+) is adsorbed to and immobilized by gypsum slurry absorbent (hereinafter, also referred to as “slurry”) to reduce mercury. In this process, the speed of mercury (Hg) reduction generally depends on the speed of gypsum (CaSO4) generation.
Therefore, to increase the speed of mercury reduction, it is necessary to increase the speed of gypsum (CaSO4) generation; however, because the ratio of mercury (Hg) and sulfur (S) contained in a coal depends on the properties of the coal, it is difficult to increase only the speed of gypsum generation.
Therefore, if the amount of gypsum produced in the slurry containing gypsum-limestone is small when using a coal containing less sulfur (S) with respect to mercury (Hg), the performance of mercury (Hg) reduction might be insufficient.
In addition, air or oxygen-enriched air is added to keep the slurry oxidized, to prevent mercury oxide (Hg2+) from being reduced (Hg2+→Hg0 ), and to prevent the re-entrainment of zero-valent mercury (Hg0 to a gaseous phase.
However, if the flue gas contains a large volume of reducing substance, a predetermined level of oxidization (oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) of equal to or more than +150 millivolts) may not be maintained, and the re-entrainment of zero-valent mercury (Hg0 ) to the gaseous phase may not be suppressed. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce mercury contained in flue gas effectively by way of other countermeasures.
In consideration of the above, an object of the present invention is to provide an air pollution control system and an air pollution control method both of which are for a coal combustion boiler capable of effectively reducing mercury contained in flue gas emitted from the coal combustion boiler.
According to an aspect of the present invention, an air pollution control system for a coal combustion boiler includes: a NOx removing apparatus that removes nitrogen oxide contained in flue gas emitted from the coal combustion boiler; an air pre-heater that recovers heat in the gas after the nitrogen oxide is removed; a precipitator that reduces particulates from the gas after the heat is recovered; a liquid-gas contact type desulfurizer that removes sulfur oxide by way of a limestone-gypsum method and reduces mercury oxide in the gas after the particulates are reduced; and a stack that releases gas after SOx removal. A gypsum concentration in slurry is kept equal to or higher than 10 percent in the desulfurizer.
According to another aspect of the present invention, an air pollution control system for a coal combustion boiler, the air pollution control system includes: a NOx removing apparatus that removes nitrogen oxide contained in flue gas emitted from the coal combustion boiler; an air pre-heater that recovers heat in the gas after the nitrogen oxide is removed; a precipitator that reduces particulates from the gas after the heat is recovered; a liquid-gas contact type desulfurizer that removes sulfur oxide by way of a limestone-gypsum method and reduces mercury oxide in the gas after the particulates are reduced; a stack that releases gas after SOx removal; and a shear force applying unit that applies a shear force to limestone-gypsum containing slurry.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, an air pollution control system for a coal combustion boiler, the air pollution control system includes: a NOx removing apparatus that removes nitrogen oxide contained in flue gas emitted from the coal combustion boiler; an air pre-heater that recovers heat in the gas after the nitrogen oxide is removed; a precipitator that reduces particulates from the gas after the heat is recovered; a liquid-gas contact type desulfurizer that removes sulfur oxide by way of a limestone-gypsum method and reduces mercury oxide in the gas after the particulates are reduced; and a stack that releases gas after SOx removal. A sulfate-based compound is added to limestone-gypsum containing slurry.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, an air pollution control method for a coal combustion boiler using a liquid-gas contact type desulfurizer that removes sulfur oxide by way of a limestone-gypsum method and reduces mercury oxide contained in flue gas emitted from the coal combustion boiler, includes: keeping a gypsum concentration in slurry equal to or higher than 10 percent in the desulfurizer.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, an air pollution control method for a coal combustion boiler using a liquid-gas contact type desulfurizer that removes sulfur oxide by way of a limestone-gypsum method and reduces mercury oxide contained in flue gas emitted from the coal combustion boiler, includes: applying a shear force to limestone-gypsum containing slurry.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, an air pollution control method for a coal combustion boiler using a liquid-gas contact type desulfurizer that removes sulfur oxide by way of a limestone-gypsum method and reduces mercury oxide contained in flue gas emitted from the coal combustion boiler, includes: adding a sulfate-based compound to limestone-gypsum containing slurry.
According to the present invention, the contact efficiency between mercury contained in the flue gas and the gypsum can be improved, and adsorption/immobilization of the mercury can be promoted.
The present invention will now be explained in detail with reference to the drawings. An embodiment of the present invention disclosed herein is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any way. Furthermore, elements disclosed in the embodiment include elements that can be easily thought of by those skilled in the art and elements that are substantially identical.
An air pollution control system for a coal combustion boiler according to an embodiment of the present invention will now be explained with reference to the drawings.
As illustrated in
Furthermore, to adjust the gypsum concentration, a solid-liquid separator 22 for extracting limestone-gypsum containing slurry 21 from the desulfurizer 16 to the exterior and for performing solid-liquid separation may be included. Water 23 separated in the solid-liquid separator 22 is removed, and concentrated slurry 24 is sent to the lower portion of the desulfurizer 16 to keep the gypsum concentration in the slurry 25 equal to or higher than 10 percent in the desulfurizer 16.
In the drawing, the reference numeral 18 denotes air for oxidization, and the reference numeral 19 denotes an oxidation-reduction potential measuring meter (ORP meter).
The slurry 25 having a higher concentration of the gypsum in the desulfurizer 16 is supplied to the upper area of the desulfurizer 16 by way of a pump P and sprayed 25a by way of a spray, and a sulfur component and mercury contained in flue gas 26 is reduced through gas-liquid contact.
The air pollution control system further includes a gypsum separator 31 that extracts the limestone-gypsum containing slurry 21 from the desulfurizer 16 to the exterior and separates the gypsum 32 therefrom. The gypsum 32 is removed in the gypsum separator 31, and water 33 separated therefrom is sent back to the lower area of the desulfurizer 16. The water 33 is discharged to the exterior as required.
According to the embodiment, the gypsum concentration in the slurry 25 is increased in the desulfurizer 16 to improve the probability that the mercury (Hg) contained in the flue gas guided into the desulfurizer 16 contacts the gypsum (CaSO4). As a result, adsorption/immobilization of the mercury can be promoted.
It has been proven that there is a direct relationship between a higher gypsum concentration in the slurry 25 in the desulfurizer 16 and a higher mercury adsorbing efficiency as depicted in
Therefore, by keeping the gypsum concentration to 10 to 30 percent, the probability of the mercury (Hg) contained in the flue gas contacting the gypsum (CaSO4) can be increased. As a result, adsorption/immobilization of the mercury can be promoted, to improve the efficiency of reducing mercury contained in the flue gas.
Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the gypsum separator 31 and the solid-liquid separator 22 are arranged separately; however, the present invention is not limited thereto, and these separators may be formed in a single solid-liquid separator having two channels through which each of the separated water 23 and the concentrated slurry 24 is sent back to the desulfurizer 16 or discharged to the outside of the system. Thus, a single solid-liquid separating facility can be used to accommodate with an increase/decrease of the concentration. The concentrated slurry (dehydrated gypsum) is sent back to increase the slurry concentration, and the separated water 23 is sent back to decrease the concentration.
Furthermore, as an embodiment of the present invention, a gas-liquid contacting desulfurizer having a structure for jetting out the slurry, such as one illustrated in
In
In other words, in the gas-liquid contact type in which the slurry is sprayed down from the upper area of the apparatus such as one according to the first embodiment, fillers may be packed in the apparatus to improve the gas contact efficiency. In such a scenario, when the gypsum concentration in the slurry reaches about 30 percent, good slurry behavior cannot be achieved, resulting in clogging of the packed bed, whereby the contact efficiency between mercury and the slurry declines.
By using the liquid column-like slurry 25b such as the one according to the present embodiment, the discharging efficiency of the jet 29 rarely declines even if the gypsum concentration in the slurry increases, and good slurry behavior can be achieved. Thus, the contact efficiency between mercury and the slurry does not decline. Therefore, it can be said that, in comparison with the first embodiment, the present embodiment is more suitable for reducing the mercury contained in the flue gas when the gypsum concentration is high.
Furthermore, as an embodiment of the present invention, as illustrated in
The pressurizing tank 28 may be included as required, and the liquid column-like slurry 25b may be formed by way of a pump P1 via the jet 29.
In this manner, the probability of the mercury (Hg) contained in the flue gas contacting the gypsum (CaSO4) can be increased, and, as a result, adsorption/immobilization of the mercury can be promoted; thus, the efficiency of reducing the mercury contained in the flue gas can be improved.
Furthermore, as an embodiment of the present invention, as illustrated in
In this manner, the probability of the mercury (Hg) contained in the flue gas contacting the gypsum (CaSO4) can be increased, and as a result, adsorption/immobilization of the mercury can be promoted, whereby the efficiency of reducing the mercury contained in the flue gas can be improved.
Furthermore, as illustrated in
Reaction formulas for generating gypsum to increase the gypsum concentration are indicated as (3) to (5) below:
SO32−+Ca2+→CaSO3 (3)
CaSO3+1/2O2→CaSO4 (gypsum generated by way of oxidization) (4)
SO42−+Ca2+→CaSO4 (gypsum generation) (5)
The sulfated compound may be added in the gas-liquid contactor (40A), or to the absorbent on an upstream side (40B) or a downstream side (40C) of the gypsum separator 31.
As described above, according to the present invention, adsorption/immobilization of the mercury can be promoted by increasing the probability of the mercury contacting the gypsum.
Therefore, according to the embodiment, the amount of gypsum generated in the slurry can be increased by adding a sulfate-based compound, and adsorption/immobilization of the mercury can actively be promoted.
Furthermore, the first to the fifth embodiments can be combined as appropriate to further promote adsorption/immobilization of the mercury by way of such a combination.
As described above, in the air pollution control system and the air pollution control method according to the present invention, adsorption/immobilization of the mercury can be promoted by increasing the probability of the mercury contacting the gypsum. Accordingly, they are suitable for controlling air pollution when a restriction is imposed on the amount of an emission of mercury contained in the flue gas.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2008-010330 | Jan 2008 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2009/050770 | 1/20/2009 | WO | 00 | 7/16/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/093575 | 7/30/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3977890 | Jaunarajs et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3985860 | Mandelik et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4337238 | Cody et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4832936 | Holter et al. | May 1989 | A |
6638485 | Iida et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
20030170159 | Honjo et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
57-015822 | Jan 1982 | JP |
10-230137 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2000-015052 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2003-053142 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-236334 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004-313833 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2007-007612 | Jan 2007 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110052470 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |