This application claims priority to Belgium Application No. 2016/5457 filed Jun. 22, 2016, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In agricultural machines such as combine harvesters, air measurements can be taken by pressure or airflow sensors, for example in a cleaning system of the machine. In such airflow sensors, the measuring principle is important for the outcome of the measurements, and therefore the airflow through or into the sensor should be representative of the pressure or airflow that is to be measured.
Water and dust however can damage the sensor and thus should be prevented from reaching the sensor itself. In particular, if an operator cleans the machine with a high pressure washer, the high pressure water can damage the airflow sensor. In some examples, it may not be acceptable to place a protection plate before the airflow sensor because doing so can influence the pressure measurements due to air turbulence around the protection plate.
According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided an air sensor system comprising:
Use of such a filter can advantageously protect the pressure or airflow sensor from both dust and high pressure water.
The micro filter may comprise a sintered material filter. The micro filter can have openings of the order of 0.1 μm to 20 to μm. The micro filter may have a water entry pressure characteristic of the order of 0.1 bar.
The hydrophobic membrane may have a water entry pressure characteristic of the order of 1 to 10 bar.
The hydrophobic membrane may be a shorter distance away from the pressure or airflow sensor than the micro filter along the air flow path to the pressure or airflow sensor.
The micro filter and the hydrophobic membrane may cover substantially the entire cross-sectional area of the air flow path. The cross-section may be in a direction that is transverse to the direction of air flow through the filter.
The micro filter and the hydrophobic membrane may be adjacent to each other. The micro filter and the hydrophobic membrane may be in direct physical contact with each other.
The filter housing may have a recess. The filter may be located in the recess.
The air sensor system (100) may further comprise a seal, which may be located in the recess between the filter housing and a downstream surface of the filter. A thickness of the seal may define a tapering profile as it extends away from the filter. The seal may comprise one or more ribs that extend away from, and around, an outer surface of the seal, in order to engage with the filter housing.
An upstream surface of the filter may be flush with an outer surface of the filter housing.
The air sensor system may comprise a plurality of filters located in the filter housing. Downstream of each of the plurality of filters, there may be provided a filter-conduit that connects to a common sensor-conduit. The sensor-conduit may be in fluid communication with the pressure or airflow sensor.
The air sensor system may be for an agricultural machine.
There may be provided an agricultural machine comprising one or more of any of the air sensor systems disclosed herein. The agricultural machine may be a combine harvester, a forage harvester, a baler, a grape harvester, a seeder or a planter.
There may also be provided a filter for placing in an air flow path, wherein the filter comprises a micro filter and a hydrophobic membrane. The hydrophobic membrane may be configured to be located downstream of the micro filter in the air flow path. The filter may be provided independently of a sensor or any other components.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
In this example the air sensor system is an air pressure system 100 that includes an air pressure sensor, although in other examples the air sensor system may include a different type of air sensor, such as an airflow sensor.
The air pressure sensor system 100 includes a pressure sensor 102. The pressure sensor 102 can be any type of sensor, for example it may be a thermal mass flow sensor, a membrane sensor, a hot or cold wire sensor or a vortex sensor. The air pressure sensor system 100 also includes a filter housing 104, which defines an air flow path to the pressure sensor 102. A filter 106 is located in the air flow path. As will be discussed below, advantageously the filter 106 can protect the pressure sensor 102 from both dust and high pressure water.
The filter 106 includes a sintered material filter 108 and a hydrophobic membrane 110. The sintered material filter 108 is an example of a micro filter. The hydrophobic membrane 110 is downstream of the sintered material filter 108 such that airflow passes through the sintered material filter 108 before it passes through the hydrophobic membrane 110 on its way to the pressure sensor 102. In this way, the hydrophobic membrane 110 is a shorter distance away from the pressure sensor 102 than the sintered material filter 108, along the air flow path to the pressure sensor 102. Also, the sintered material filter 108 and the hydrophobic membrane 110 cover substantially the entire cross-sectional area of the air flow path, where the cross-section is in a direction that is transverse to the direction of air flow through the filter 106.
Any micro filter may be used, for example any filter that has openings/pores of the order of 20, 10, 5, 3, 1 or 0.1 μm. The micro filter may have a “water entry pressure” (WEP) characteristic that defines the pressure that is needed to make the water pass through the filter. The micro filter may have a WEP of the order of 0.1 bar. The micro filter may comprise a sintered material filter 108, in that it may be made from a sintered material such that is has the desired pore size. The sintered material filter may be a bronze sintered filter, sintered metal filter, or an HDPE filter (sintered polyethylene) as non-limiting examples.
In this example, the sintered material filter 108 comprises a metal that has openings that are 3 μm, and can reduce the pressure of high pressure water from 100 bar on an upstream surface of the sintered material filter 108, to less than 1 bar on a downstream surface of the sintered material filter 108. In such an example, any water that is temporarily retained in the sintered material filter 108 may have substantially left the filter 106 about 20 minutes after the high pressure water is removed. This can be considered quickly enough for some applications.
The hydrophobic membrane 110 may be made of Polyester, PTFE, nylon, polypropylene, hydrophobic and oleophobic materials, as non-limiting examples. Of course, other membrane materials can be used that have a satisfactorily high resistance to water, and a satisfactorily low resistance to air. In this example, the hydrophobic membrane 110 can withstand water that comes through the sintered material filter 108 at pressures of up to about 1 bar. That is, the hydrophobic membrane 110 may have a “water entry pressure” (WEP) characteristic of about 1 bar, which means that the surface tension of the membrane 110 is broken at 1 bar such that water at a higher pressure than this can get through the membrane 110. In other examples, a hydrophobic membrane 110 that can hold back water at pressures of up to 2, 5, 6, or 10 bar can be used, as non-limiting examples.
The hydrophobic membrane 110 in this example is defined with a flowrate of 261/min/cm2/bar. It will be appreciated that in some applications the hydrophobic membrane 110 should have as high a flow rate as possible, such that the pressure sensor 102 can take a more accurate reading.
The sintered material filter 108 can cope well with dust and water at low pressures, in that it can sufficiently impede or prevent the flow of dust and low pressure water through the sintered material filter 108. However, the sintered material filter 108 may allow high pressure water to pass through it, for example when an operator cleans his combine harvester with a high pressure washer. Nonetheless, the sintered material filter 108 may not be damaged by the impact of high pressure water, even if it does not completely hold the water back.
The hydrophobic membrane 110, in contrast, may not be able to cope with the impact of high pressure water (in that the impact may damage the membrane 110), although it can have a good resistance towards water ingress (especially under lower pressures).
By placing the hydrophobic membrane 110 behind the sintered material filter 108, as shown in
By combining the two different filter types (the sintered material filter 108 and the hydrophobic membrane 110) as shown in
In this example, the sintered material filter 108 and the hydrophobic membrane 110 are combined as a single filter element 106. After the filter element 116 is sprayed with water, it may take some time for the water to migrate out of the sintered material filter 108. This removal of water may be principally due to evaporation, and may be through an outer (upstream) surface of the sintered material filter 108 such that the water is still not able to reach the pressure sensor 102 as it is removed.
Advantageously, there is not a big volume/open space between the sintered material filter 108 and the hydrophobic membrane 110. In this example, the sintered material filter 108 and the hydrophobic membrane 110 are adjacent to each other such that they are in direct physical contact with each other. By pressing the hydrophobic membrane 110 against the sintered material filter 108, the volume of an open space between these two components can be minimized. Having a relatively small open space between the sintered material filter 108 and the hydrophobic membrane 110 can assist with reducing a dry out time of the filter 106. If there were a large open space, then that volume could fill up with water following cleaning with high pressure water, and it would likely take longer for the water to migrate out of the sintered material filter 108.
As shown in
The upstream surface of the filter 106, more particularly, the upstream surface of the sintered material filter 108, is flush with an outer surface of the filter housing 104 in this example. In this way, an accurate representation of air pressure can be measured because there will be limited interruptions to the airflow passing through the filter 106 to the pressure sensor 102. In contrast, if there were any discontinuities in the geometry of the outer surface of the air pressure sensor system 100, this could cause turbulence and could affect the accuracy of the pressure measurement taken by the pressure sensor 102.
In this example, the thickness of the seal 212 defines a tapering profile as it extends away from the hydrophobic membrane 210. In this way, the air flow path has an expanding profile as it extends downstream of the hydrophobic membrane 210. That is, the cross-sectional area of the seal 212 increases as the distance from the hydrophobic membrane 210 decreases. In this way, the surface area of the seal 212 that is to be fixed to the membrane can be sufficiently large.
The example of
One or more of the filters described herein may have a round/circular shape, when viewed from the top as they are shown in
The implementation of
It will be appreciated that the pressure sensor 302 need not be directly mounted to the filter housing 302. In some examples, the component labelled with reference 302 in
There may also be provided an agricultural machine, such as a combine harvester, a forage harvester, a baler, a grape harvester, a seeder and a planter that includes one or more of the air sensor systems described herein. The air sensor system may be located in a cleaning system, for example a first air pressure sensor system may be located on a first side of a sieve, and a second air pressure sensor system may be located on a second side of the sieve, such that a pressure differential across the sieve can be measured. It will be appreciated that any of the air sensor systems disclosed herein can be associated with any element or mechanical structure, and that it is not limited to use with sieves.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2016/5457 | Jun 2016 | BE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2747407 | Knoll | May 1956 | A |
4912981 | King | Apr 1990 | A |
5692637 | Hodge | Dec 1997 | A |
5992239 | Boehringer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6422085 | Hegner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6972115 | Ballard | Dec 2005 | B1 |
8122765 | Brechbuhl et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8915624 | Manahan | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9526211 | Murray et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20030005772 | Hegner et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040019313 | Childers | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20070151231 | Rinaldi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080269679 | Arnold | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100269583 | Jasnie | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120161596 | Manahan | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20150112265 | Tsoukalis | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150346174 | Beaulieu | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160059171 | Lukasavitz | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160146655 | Gardiner | May 2016 | A1 |
20170002821 | Claussen | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4235684 | Apr 1994 | DE |
202004001139 | Apr 2004 | DE |
102013213482 | Jan 2015 | DE |
1104231 | Feb 1968 | GB |
2130375 | May 1984 | GB |
20130375 | May 1984 | GB |
2008004862 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2013110639 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for EP17176696.7, dated Nov. 7, 2017 (8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170370959 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |