1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to low-NOx burners, and, in particular, to air-staged low-NOx burners.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) are produced from the burning of fuels during the normal operation of a typical burner. These oxides combine with hydrocarbons in the atmosphere, creating “smog”, which, when inhaled, may cause injury. Further, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, as well as state and local air pollution agencies, have passed certain environmental laws providing limitations and technological standards on the amount of NOx a facility may emit. These standards are continuing to become more and more stringent, creating a technological need for low-NOx burners.
Decreasing the NOx emissions from a burner is a well-known need. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,004,875 to Zink et al. (hereinafter “the Zink patent”) discloses a low-NOx burner concept that introduces secondary air to the hot face of the burner in addition to the primary air. In the Zink patent, primary air is provided in an amount that is insufficient to completely combust the fuel. The secondary air is introduced in a second stage to complete the combustion process. Overall, the use of staged air in this manner leads to reduced NOx emissions from the burner unit. Likewise, U.S. Pat. No. 4,347,052 to Reed et al. discloses the use of primary, secondary and tertiary air in predetermined stoichiometric proportions in order to stage combustion and, thus, reduce the production of NOx from the burner. Finally, U.S. Pat. No. 4,983,118 to Hovis et al. describes the use of air staging to reduce the production of NOx from a regenerative burner. The introduction of secondary or tertiary air in all of these burner concepts demonstrates the well-known usage of incomplete combustion to retard the production of NOx from the burner. This retardation occurs due to the overabundance of carbon dioxide, water vapor and methane in the burner mix at the initial stage.
As the environmental laws tighten, there is still considerable room in the art for technology that further reduces the production of NOx from industrial burners. While the above-referenced patents, among others, use incomplete combustion to reduce NOx, improvements over this design concept are in need.
The present invention uses staged air combustion to reduce the production of NOx from a burner and includes a burner body adjacent a port block. The present invention also includes a fuel passageway connecting a fuel source to a burner throat. Primary air jets are connected to an air source and inject air into a primary combustion region. This primary combustion region is in the burner throat. The primary air jets can be configured such that air is introduced into the primary combustion region in a swirling manner. A dish surface is located in the port block; the dish surface extending in an angle divergent with respect to a centerline extending through the burner throat. Finally, the present invention utilizes secondary air jets connected to an air source. These secondary air jets extend through the port block and inject secondary air into a secondary combustion region located downstream from the primary combustion region.
The present invention also includes a method of reducing NOx emissions from a burner, wherein fuel is taken from a fuel source and injected into a burner throat via a fuel passageway, and primary air is injected from an air source into a primary combustion region in the burner throat. Further, this primary combustion is conducted in a fuel-rich highly vitiated environment which consumes available oxygen, limiting flame temperature and thermal NOx. Fuel is fed into the burner and proceeds to the throat where the primary air and fuel mix together to form the initial stage of combustion. A combustion reaction is initiated in the burner throat. The preferable convergent, angled introduction of the air through the primary air jets creates a swirling cyclone pattern that hugs the walls of the port block and pulls and mixes the fuel and recirculated products of combustion into the cyclone. After the primary combustion step, the air/fuel mixture then enters a secondary combustion region. Air is introduced into the secondary combustion region so as to allow the combustion process to complete. Products of combustion are drawn into a vortex created by the swirling mixture of fuel and air during the combustion process. The overall NOx production is thereby reduced.
As seen in
The present invention is an apparatus and method directed to an air-staged low-NOx burner. The first embodiment is illustrated in
Due to the jet action and an angular orientation of the primary air jets 20, the air enters the throat 40 in a swirling manner, illustrated as line 21 in
The combustion process is initiated by spark, pilot flame or another suitable method. Upon ignition, combustion occurs in the primary combustion region 24. However, the fuel to primary air ratio is adjusted to ensure this combustion occurs under a highly vitiated fuel-rich condition. The fuel-rich condition allows the combustion process to consume all available oxygen, disallowing complete combustion and preventing creation of excess thermal NOx. Combustion under fuel-rich conditions, coupled with the recirculated products of combustion pulled through the vortex, limits flame temperature and reduces the amount of thermal NOx produced. Further, the “Coanda effect” causes the combusted mixture to continue along the surface of the burner throat 40, the cup 26, and along the dish surface 28. This also provides a uniform temperature and rotating flame within the port block 42. The dish surface 28 extends in a divergent manner with respect to a centerline 35 running through the longitudinal axis of the burner throat 40. Specifically, in the case of a planar or flat dish surface 28, this angle of divergence a between the dish surface 28 and centerline 35 may be between about 25° and 89° (i.e., ±5° on either end of the range) with the preferred angle α between about 25° and about 50° (i.e., ±5°).
It is also envisioned that the dish surface 28 may have a continuously shifting angle of divergence α, resulting in a trumpet-like shape to the dish surface 28. As shown in
As the combusted mixture rides out of the cup 26 and into the dish surface 28, the negative vortex continues to pull the products of combustion through the mixture from a furnace atmosphere into which the burner is firing. This mixture then encounters the secondary air jets 34, which open into the dish surface 28. In a preferred embodiment, these secondary air jets 34 are oriented in a divergent manner. As illustrated in
The primary air jets 20 and the secondary air jets 34 are controlled as to both velocity and air split ratio. Both of these characteristics control the flame geometry, combustion pattern and the amount of emissions emitted from the burner. Specifically, it is envisioned that the air split ratio be within the limits of 40/60 (primary air/secondary air) to 75/25 (primary air/secondary air). As shown in
Another embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
The third embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
While the current air supply of primary and secondary air is described as emanating from a common air source, it is also anticipated that a second air source can be used to supply the secondary air jets 34. For example, the air may be supplied through direct connections to passageways in the port block 42. Using alternate air supplies allow further control of the flame geometry and combustion characteristics through stoichiometric variation. As seen in
In another variation, the number and location of secondary air jets 34 may be changed, affecting the flame geometry and combustion process.
Another arrangement for adjusting flame stability is seen in
It will be evident to those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes and modifications may be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. For example, the swirling effect in the burner throat 40 could be accomplished by swirling the fuel, instead of swirling the primary combustion air, as described above. It is therefore intended that the invention be limited only by the attached claims, and equivalents thereof.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US00/41596 | 10/26/2000 | WO | 00 | 8/5/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/35022 | 5/17/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2250680 | Schlitt | Jul 1941 | A |
2398611 | Beggs | Apr 1946 | A |
3267984 | Reed et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3418062 | Hovis et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3424542 | Moore et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3758263 | Kissel | Sep 1973 | A |
3836315 | Shular | Sep 1974 | A |
3876362 | Hirose | Apr 1975 | A |
4004875 | Zink et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4220444 | Reed et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4347052 | Reed et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4348168 | Coulon | Sep 1982 | A |
4351632 | Nagai | Sep 1982 | A |
4357134 | Katsushige et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4439137 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4443182 | Wojcieson et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4475885 | Finke | Oct 1984 | A |
4741279 | Azuhata et al. | May 1988 | A |
4842509 | Hasenack | Jun 1989 | A |
4911637 | Moore et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4945841 | Nakamachi et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4983118 | Hovis et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5240410 | Yang et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5269679 | Syska et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5433600 | Jeng et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5658141 | Larquet et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5743723 | Iatrides et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5797738 | Wills | Aug 1998 | A |
5813846 | Newby et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5944507 | Feldermann | Aug 1999 | A |
6471508 | Finke et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4001378 | Jul 1991 | DE |
41 30 922 | Mar 1993 | DE |
0 040 526 | Nov 1981 | EP |
0 498 378 | Aug 1992 | EP |
0 736 732 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0 774 620 | May 1997 | EP |
0 774 620 | May 1997 | EP |
0 877 202 | Nov 1998 | EP |
2 094 464 | Sep 1982 | GB |
52-32132 | Mar 1952 | JP |
55-32132 | Mar 1977 | JP |
52-140920 | Nov 1977 | JP |
53-141931 | Dec 1978 | JP |
53-141932 | Dec 1978 | JP |
54-52339 | Apr 1979 | JP |
54-54340 | Apr 1979 | JP |
54-55825 | May 1979 | JP |
55-60109 | May 1980 | JP |
56-20908 | Feb 1981 | JP |
559-145405 | Aug 1984 | JP |
62-134410 | Jun 1987 | JP |
03-63401 | Mar 1991 | JP |
404009511 | Jan 1992 | JP |
6-193824 | Jul 1994 | JP |
07-318020 | Dec 1995 | JP |
08-94253 | Apr 1996 | JP |
8-128608 | May 1996 | JP |
08-178227 | Jul 1996 | JP |
08-226619 | Sep 1996 | JP |
09-133347 | May 1997 | JP |
9-217904 | Aug 1997 | JP |
09-229315 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10-89614 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-176809 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-176810 | Jun 1998 | JP |
WO 9609496 | Mar 1996 | WO |