Patent Grant
9149759
The disclosure relates generally to controlling contaminant emissions and particularly to introducing additives to contaminant-containing gases.
Injection of hydrated lime and other alkaline materials is a promising technology for control of acid, such as NOX (NO and NO2), HCl, and SOX (SO2 and SO3) from coal- and biomass-fired sources. Acid gas control is becoming obligatory due to the problems arising from increased corrosion, acid mist emissions and associated impacts to plant opacity, and the propensity of certain acid gases, such as SO3, to interfere with powdered activated carbon (“PAC”) used for mercury capture from these sources. Concerns with SO3 emissions have increased due to selective catalytic reduction reactors (“SCRs”) oxidizing sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide. SCRs are being installed on an increasing number of coal-fired sources for control of nitrogen oxides. SOX species are also present in flue gas at elevated levels when burning high sulfur coals. The presence of sulfur species and the ammonia reactants used for nitrogen oxide control can combine to form condensable compounds that foul or degrade air heater performance over time.
Injection of dry alkaline sorbents to control acid gas emissions continue to be used successfully at many coal-fired sources to chemically control emissions. When dry alkaline materials are injected into a gas stream for the purpose of controlling acid gases, the desired chemical reactions occur in the flue gas stream.
A major goal of any injection system is to maximize the desired reactions and minimize undesired reactions and/or interactions with the walls and mechanical systems downstream. As an example, one of the desired acid gas reactions between hydrated lime and SO3 is shown below:
Ca(OH)2+SO3→CaSO4+H2O
hydrated lime+sulfur trioxide=calcium sulfate+water
One of the major undesired reactions that occurs within the alkaline sorbent injection system is chemisorption of carbon dioxide by hydrated lime with carbon dioxide:
Ca(OH)2+CO2→CaCO3+H2O
hydrated lime+carbon dioxide=calcium carbonate+water
The rate of carbonate formation is believed to be a temperature-dependent process; that is, the higher the gas temperature the greater the rate of conversion of hydrate to carbonate. Calcium carbonate has been shown to be inversely soluble, therefore increasing temperature leads to greater carbonate deposition within the injection system. Managing the temperature of the injection system and lime carrier gas reduces the rate of formation and subsequently minimizes the deposition of calcium carbonate as a precipitate or scale. Due to the presence of air in the injection system, CO2 is always available for reaction in either the carrier gas or in the flue gas that contaminates the carrier gas through leakage or recirculation into the injection system. Therefore, thermal management of the injection system is employed to successfully moderate carbonate formation, reduce lime consumption, and increase system reliability.
A carrier gas treatment system 200 according to the prior art includes an optional dehumidifier 204 to reduce moisture levels (adsorption of moisture can result in caking, agglomeration and/or deposition of the sorbent within the feed, conveying, and injection components), a regenerative or positive displacement blower 208 (air having a pressure in the range of 3 to 25 psi), and a refrigerated air dryer 212 and/or after cooler 216. Other configurations and arrangements of the illustrated equipment are possible. This system 200 generally reduces the dew point of the conveying air to a temperature just above 32° F. Although the reaction of calcium hydroxide and carbon dioxide to air is slowed by the gas dehumidification and cooling, the degree of dehumidification and cooling is limited. Accordingly, conventional systems 200 generally experience debilitating issues with scaling, abrasion, plugging in the lines, lances, and other conveying surfaces in the system 200.
One prior approach is depicted in
While this system demonstrated significant reliability and pneumatic handling improvements, it can have limitations. Successful acid gas mitigation requires that the inherently high reactivity of hydrated lime be preserved. By first using the hydrated lime as a CO2 sorbent, this system converts expensive highly reactive hydrated lime to calcium carbonate and delivers the carbonate form mixed with degraded hydrated lime. The system introduces water to the stored sorbent in the silo originating from the carbonate reaction. Water can agglomerate the finely sized calcium hydroxide particles and ultimately impact the ability of this material to be subsequently metered from the silo and conveyed to and effectively dispersed within the duct.
The system has failed in operation. The time-to-failure can be described as the time required for the carbonate scale to form and occlude the system to the extent that material can no longer be conveyed, at which point a labor-intensive mechanical cleaning of the conveyance system internal surfaces or component replacement is required. Another limitation of the system is that the level of CO2 removed varies with the material level in the silo. Because the silo level changes over time, the delivered motive air quality will vary. In other words, the silo level is directly proportional to the contact time between the air and sorbent. Thus, lower silo levels result in lower contact times, thereby introducing variability to the CO2 concentration in the carrier gas.
These problems increase the necessity for time-consuming and expensive manual cleaning and maintenance of the introduction system due to precipitate and scale formation.
These and other needs are addressed by the various aspects, embodiments, and configurations of the present disclosure. The aspects, embodiments, and configurations are directed generally to the delivery of additives to contaminated gas streams.
In one aspect, a method includes the steps:
(a) compressing, by a compressor, a carrier gas to form a compressed carrier gas;
(b) contacting an additive with the compressed carrier gas to form an additive-containing fluid; and
(c) introducing the additive-containing fluid into a contaminated gas stream.
In another aspect, a system includes:
(a) a carrier gas treatment system to compress a carrier gas and form a treated carrier gas stream;
(b) a mixing system to contact additive particles with the treated carrier gas stream and form an additive-containing fluid; and
(c) a delivery system to introduce the additive-containing fluid into the contaminated gas stream.
The above aspects can address effectively additive clogging problems. Compressed gas, particularly when coupled with a downstream dryer, can remove moisture effectively, provide a low dew point, and maintain a relatively low gas temperature, thereby providing effective thermal and moisture management. Lowering the moisture content would lower the enthalpy of the conveyance air and improve conveyance performance through the elimination of heat. Moisture removal from compressed air can be much easier than moisture removal from air downstream of a positive displacement (PD) or regenerative (regen) blower. Thermal and moisture maintenance can minimize substantially water-based hydration interactions with alkaline materials, particularly lime, sodium bicarbonate, and trona, thereby leading to reduced agglomeration and/or caking of additive to conveyance system surfaces.
The compressor and compressed air dryer combination foot print can be much smaller than the footprint of a dehumidifier, blower, and after cooler combination.
A compressed air system can allow for easier system and component redundancy. For a given volume of air, the piping is smaller and easier to install valves to switch between other trains and/or compressors. It can have a simpler electrical and control layout. For example, it can avoid the need for supply breakers in a motor control center (MCC) for the dehumidifier, blower and refrigerated air dryer. Typically, only the compressor and air dryer are interlocked and controlled.
The compressor and dryer combination can require less power than the combination of a dehumidifier, blower, and refrigerated air dryer. Since the combination can require less equipment and less power is being consumed, an arrangement with a compressor and air dryer can also decrease the cooling load for a room containing this equipment.
In another aspect, a system includes one or more lances for receiving an additive-containing fluid and introducing the additive-containing fluid into a contaminated gas stream. The lance(s) extend into the contaminated gas stream. The contaminated gas stream has a temperature above about 95° F. The lance(s) is cooled by a cooling medium to maintain an interior of the at least one lance at a temperature below the temperature of the contaminated gas stream.
Thermal management in the lance can further reduce clogging and scaling problems from alkaline additives by providing a cool, dry, and expanded compressed air as the motive carrier gas even when ambient air is used as the source of the carrier gas. This results from controlling system temperature to hinder carbonate formation versus controlling the small amount of ambient CO2. As will be appreciated, the reaction kinetics for conversion of hydrate to carbonate is directly proportional to carrier gas temperature; therefore, higher carrier gas temperatures lead to increased formation of carbonates. Calcium carbonate is an inverse soluble salt; that is, as temperature increases, the formation and deposition of carbonate within the injection system also increases. Controlling the injection system and conveying fluid temperature can reduce the rate of carbonate formation and subsequently substantially minimize the deposition of calcium carbonate.
In another aspect, a system includes one or more lance(s) for receiving an additive-containing fluid and introducing the additive-containing fluid into a contaminated gas stream. The lance(s) comprises an eductor nozzle.
The eductor nozzle can provide a substantially uniform distribution of additive particles in the contaminated gas stream.
In another aspect, which may be used, independently or conjunctively, with the foregoing aspects, carbon dioxide is substantially removed or otherwise absent from the carrier gas. A carbon dioxide removal device can, for example, be positioned upstream or downstream of a carrier gas compressor.
More specifically, one method performs the following steps:
(a) compressing, by a compressor, a carrier gas including carbon dioxide to form a compressed carrier gas;
(b) removing most or all of the carbon dioxide from the compressed carrier gas to form a treated carrier gas;
(c) contacting an additive with the treated carrier gas to form an additive-containing fluid; and
(d) introducing the additive-containing fluid into a contaminated gas stream.
A system configuration can include the following:
(a) a carrier gas treatment system to compress and remove most or substantially all of the carbon dioxide from a carrier gas and form a treated carrier gas stream;
(b) a mixing system to contact additive particles with the treated carrier gas stream and form an additive-containing fluid; and
(c) a delivery system to introduce the additive-containing fluid into the contaminated gas stream.
Removal of carbon dioxide from the carrier gas source can be done by any number of techniques. For example, carbon dioxide removal may be done using sorbents either alone or in conjunction with a permeable and porous, fixed or fluidized sorbent bed or block, pressure/temperature swing process, carbon dioxide selective membrane, and/or cryogenic separator.
Removing carbon dioxide from the carrier gas can provide a number of benefits. Carbon dioxide can be removed on a reliable and affordable basis, particularly from compressed air systems. Such technologies may not be available for systems that use either regenerative or positive displacement blowers. Carbon dioxide removal can yield increased system reliability and gas conveyance system performance gain. Carbon dioxide is a necessary reactant for forming carbonates. While it may be advantageous to maintain air temperatures of less than 95° F., removing CO2 can prevent or inhibit the carbonate reaction, avoid dependence on maintaining this air temperature, and provide greater system operational flexibility. By contacting the carrier gas with the carbon dioxide separator upstream of the point of contact with the additive, the system can substantially preserve and maintain inherently high reactivity of hydrated lime with acid gas. Typically, the additive, upon injection into the contaminated gas stream is substantially free of carbonates, more typically no more than about 5 wt. %, even more typically no more than about 1 wt. %, more typically no more than about 0.5 wt. %, and even more typically no more than about 0.1 wt. % of the additive introduced by the additive introduction system into the contaminated gas stream are carbonates.
In another aspect, a method includes the steps:
(a) detecting, by a processor, a stimulus associated with cleaning of an additive introduction system, the additive introduction system delivering an additive into a contaminated gas stream;
(b) terminating, by the processor, a supply of additive while continuing to supply a carrier gas to the additive introduction system;
(c) determining, by the processor, whether a gas flow is acceptable;
(d) when the gas flow is not acceptable, terminating, by the processor, the supply of the carrier gas to the additive introduction system; and
(e) passing a purge gas through the additive introduction system to remove deposited additive or a derivative thereof.
In another aspect, a method includes the steps:
(a) detecting, by a processor, a stimulus associated with cleaning of an additive introduction system, the additive introduction system delivering an additive into a contaminated gas stream;
(b) terminating, by the processor, a supply of additive to the additive introduction system; and
(c) passing a chemical cleaner through the additive introduction system, the cleaner removing substantially deposits of the additive and/or an additive derivative from the additive introduction system.
An automated cleaning sequence can not only reliably and periodically clean the introduction system but also minimize substantially demands on personnel to perform manual system cleaning and maintenance.
These and other advantages will be apparent from the disclosure of the aspects, embodiments, and configurations contained herein.
“A” or “an” entity refers to one or more of that entity. As such, the terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more” and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein. It is also to be noted that the terms “comprising”, “including”, and “having” can be used interchangeably.
“Absorption” is the incorporation of a substance in one state into another of a different state (e.g. liquids being absorbed by a solid or gases being absorbed by a liquid). Absorption is a physical or chemical phenomenon or a process in which atoms, molecules, or ions enter some bulk phase—gas, liquid or solid material. This is a different process from adsorption, since molecules undergoing absorption are taken up by the volume, not by the surface (as in the case for adsorption).
“Adsorption” is the adhesion of atoms, ions, biomolecules, or molecules of gas, liquid, or dissolved solids to a surface. This process creates a film of the adsorbate (the molecules or atoms being accumulated) on the surface of the adsorbent. It differs from absorption, in which a fluid permeates or is dissolved by a liquid or solid. Similar to surface tension, adsorption is generally a consequence of surface energy. The exact nature of the bonding depends on the details of the species involved, but the adsorption process is generally classified as physisorption (characteristic of weak van der Waals forces) or chemisorption (characteristic of covalent bonding). It may also occur due to electrostatic attraction.
“Ash” refers to the residue remaining after complete combustion of the coal particles. Ash typically includes mineral matter (silica, alumina, iron oxide, etc.).
“At least one”, “one or more”, and “and/or” are open-ended expressions that are both conjunctive and disjunctive in operation. For example, each of the expressions “at least one of A, B and C”, “at least one of A, B, or C”, “one or more of A, B, and C”, “one or more of A, B, or C” and “A, B, and/or C” means A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A, B and C together. When each one of A, B, and C in the above expressions refers to an element, such as X, Y, and Z, or class of elements, such as X1-Xn, Y1-Ym, and Z1-Zo, the phrase is intended to refer to a single element selected from X, Y, and Z, a combination of elements selected from the same class (e.g., X1 and X2) as well as a combination of elements selected from two or more classes (e.g., Y1 and Zo).
“Biomass” refers to biological matter from living or recently living organisms. Examples of biomass include, without limitation, wood, waste, (hydrogen) gas, seaweed, algae, and alcohol fuels. Biomass can be plant matter grown to generate electricity or heat. Biomass also includes, without limitation, plant or animal matter used for production of fibers or chemicals. Biomass further includes, without limitation, biodegradable wastes that can be burnt as fuel but generally excludes organic materials, such as fossil fuels, which have been transformed by geologic processes into substances such as coal or petroleum. Industrial biomass can be grown from numerous types of plants, including miscanthus, switchgrass, hemp, corn, poplar, willow, sorghum, sugarcane, and a variety of tree species, ranging from eucalyptus to oil palm (or palm oil).
“Coal” refers to a combustible material formed from prehistoric plant life. Coal includes, without limitation, peat, lignite, sub-bituminous coal, bituminous coal, steam coal, waste coal, anthracite, and graphite. Chemically, coal is a macromolecular network comprised of groups of polynuclear aromatic rings, to which are attached subordinate rings connected by oxygen, sulfur, and aliphatic bridges.
A “compressor” is a mechanical device that compresses a gas (e.g., air or natural gas).
A “computer-readable medium” refers to any tangible storage and/or transmission medium that participate in providing instructions to a processor for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media, and transmission media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, NVRAM, or magnetic or optical disks. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as main memory. Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic medium, magneto-optical medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, a solid state medium like a memory card, any other memory chip or cartridge, a carrier wave as described hereinafter, or any other medium from which a computer can read. A digital file attachment to e-mail or other self-contained information archive or set of archives is considered a distribution medium equivalent to a tangible storage medium. When the computer-readable media is configured as a database, it is to be understood that the database may be any type of database, such as relational, hierarchical, object-oriented, and/or the like. Accordingly, the invention is considered to include a tangible storage medium or distribution medium and prior art-recognized equivalents and successor media, in which the software implementations of the present invention are stored.
A “dehumidifier” reduces the level of humidity in the air. Mechanical/refrigerative dehumidifiers, the most common type, usually work by drawing moist air over a refrigerated coil with a small fan and/or a desiccant material. Since the saturation vapor pressure of water decreases with decreasing temperature, the water in the air condenses, and drips into a collecting bucket. The air is then reheated by the warmer side of the refrigeration coil. Electronic dehumidifiers use a peltier heat pump to generate a cool surface for condensing the water vapor from the air.
An “eductor” is an aspirator, also called an eductor-jet pump or filter pump, is a device that produces vacuum by means of the Venturi effect. In an aspirator, fluid (liquid or gaseous) flows through a tube which then narrows. When the tube narrows, the fluid's speed increases, and because of the Venturi effect, its pressure decreases. Vacuum is taken from this point.
“High alkali coals” refer to coals having a total alkali (e.g., calcium) content of at least about 20 wt. % (dry basis of the ash), typically expressed as CaO, while “low alkali coals” refer to coals having a total alkali content of less than 20 wt. % and more typically less than about 15 wt. % alkali (dry basis of the ash), typically expressed as CaO.
“High iron coals” refer to coals having a total iron content of at least about 10 wt. % (dry basis of the ash), typically expressed as Fe2O3, while “low iron coals” refer to coals having a total iron content of less than about 10 wt. % (dry basis of the ash), typically expressed as Fe2O3. As will be appreciated, iron and sulfur are typically present in coal in the form of ferrous or ferric carbonates and/or sulfides, such as iron pyrite.
“High sulfur coals” refer to coals having a total sulfur content of at least about 3 wt. % (dry basis of the coal) while “medium sulfur coals” refer to coals having between about 1.5 and 3 wt. % (dry basis of the coal) and “low sulfur coals” refer to coals having a total sulfur content of less than about 1.5 wt. % (dry basis of the coal).
“Lime” refers to a caustic alkaline earth metal substance, such as calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2), calcium oxide, and mixtures thereof produced by heating limestone.
“Particulate” refers to fine particles, such as fly ash, unburned carbon, soot and fine process solids, typically entrained in a mercury-containing gas stream.
“Rotary valve,” “rotary airlock,” or rotary feeder refers to a device used to meter, enter, or extract material between two chambers of different pressures. Most often such a device is used as a measuring or metering device.
“Saltation velocity” refers to superficial operating gas velocity and is dependent on the physical characteristics of the solids being conveyed, the desired particle mass flow rate, the physical characteristics of the additive induction system, and the thermo-chemical environment of the conveying fluid.
“Particle slip velocity” refers to the difference in the particle velocity and the superficial operating gas velocity and is dependent on the physical characteristics of the solids being conveyed.
“Separating” and cognates thereof refer to setting apart, keeping apart, sorting, removing from a mixture or combination, or isolating. In the context of gas mixtures, separating can be done by many techniques, including electrostatic precipitators, baghouses, scrubbers, and heat exchange surfaces.
A “sorbent” is a material that sorbs another substance; that is, the material has the capacity or tendency to take it up by sorption.
“Sorb” and cognates thereof mean to take up a liquid or a gas by sorption.
“Sorption” and cognates thereof refer to adsorption and absorption, while desorption is the reverse of adsorption.
A “vortex cooler” is a mechanical device that separates a compressed gas into hot and cold streams. It typically has no moving parts. Pressurized gas is injected tangentially into a swirl chamber and accelerates to a high rate of rotation. Due to the conical nozzle at the end of the tube, only the outer shell of the compressed gas is allowed to escape at that end. The remainder of the gas is forced to return in an inner vortex of reduced diameter within the outer vortex.
The preceding is a simplified summary of the disclosure to provide an understanding of some aspects of the disclosure. This summary is neither an extensive nor exhaustive overview of the disclosure and its various aspects, embodiments, and configurations. It is intended neither to identify key or critical elements of the disclosure nor to delineate the scope of the disclosure but to present selected concepts of the disclosure in a simplified form as an introduction to the more detailed description presented below. As will be appreciated, other aspects, embodiments, and configurations of the disclosure are possible utilizing, alone or in combination, one or more of the features set forth above or described in detail below.
The accompanying drawings are incorporated into and form a part of the specification to illustrate several examples of the present disclosure. These drawings, together with the description, explain the principles of the disclosure. The drawings simply illustrate preferred and alternative examples of how the disclosure can be made and used and are not to be construed as limiting the disclosure to only the illustrated and described examples. Further features and advantages will become apparent from the following, more detailed, description of the various aspects, embodiments, and configurations of the disclosure, as illustrated by the drawings referenced below.
The current disclosure is directed to an additive introduction system to introduce additives to control contaminant emissions from contaminant evolving facilities, such as smelters, autoclaves, roasters, steel foundries, steel mills, cement kilns, power plants, waste incinerators, boilers, and other contaminated gas stream producing industrial facilities. Although any contaminant may be targeted by the additive introduction system, typical contaminants include acid gases (e.g., sulfur-containing compounds (such as sulfur dioxide and trioxide produced by thermal oxidation of sulfides), nitrogen oxides (such as nitrogen monoxide and dioxide), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and hydrofluoric acid (HF)), mercury (elemental and/or speciated), carbon oxides (such as carbon monoxide and dioxide), halogens and halides, particulates (e.g., fly ash particles and other types of unburned carbon), and the like. Although the contaminant is typically evolved by combustion, it may be evolved by other oxidizing reactions, reducing reactions, and other thermal processes such as roasting, pyrolysis, and autoclaving, that expose contaminated materials to elevated temperatures.
The feed material 100 is heated in thermal unit 104 to produce a contaminated gas stream 108. The thermal unit 104 can be any heating device, including, without limitation, a dry or wet bottom furnace (e.g., a blast furnace, puddling furnace, reverberatory furnace, Bessemer converter, open hearth furnace, basic oxygen furnace, cyclone furnace, stoker boiler, cupola furnace, a fluidized bed furnace, arch furnace, and other types of furnaces), boiler, incinerator (e.g., moving grate, fixed grate, rotary-kiln, or fluidized or fixed bed, incinerators), calciners including multi-hearth, suspension or fluidized bed roasters, intermittent or continuous kiln (e.g., ceramic kiln, intermittent or continuous wood-drying kiln, anagama kiln, bottle kiln, rotary kiln, catenary arch kiln, Feller kiln, noborigama kiln, or top hat kiln), or oven.
The contaminated gas stream 108 generally includes a number of contaminants. A common contaminated gas stream 108 includes mercury, particulates (such as fly ash), sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, hydrochloric acid (HCl), carbon oxides, and unburned carbon.
The contaminated gas stream 108 is optionally passed through the preheater 112 to transfer some of the thermal energy of the contaminated gas stream 108 to air input to the thermal unit 104. The heat transfer produces a common temperature drop in the contaminated gas stream 108 of from about 500° C. to about 300° C. to produce a cooled contaminated gas stream 116 temperature commonly ranging from about 100 to about 400° C.
The cooled contaminated gas stream 116 is next subjected to particulate removal device 120 to remove most of the particulates from the contaminated gas stream and form a treated gas stream 124. The particulate removal device 120 can be any suitable device, including a wet or dry electrostatic precipitator, particulate filter such as a baghouse, wet particulate scrubber, and other types of particulate removal device.
The treated gas stream 124 is emitted, via gas discharge 128, into the environment.
To control contaminant emissions in the treated gas stream 124, an additive 132 entrained in a carrier gas 134 is introduced into the thermal unit 104, contaminated gas stream 108, or cooled contaminated gas stream 116 by an additive introduction system 138. To entrain the additive particles effectively, the additive particles typically have a mean, median, and P90 size of no more than about 100 microns and even more typically ranging from about 2 to about 50 microns. The additive-containing fluid typically includes from about 0.10 to about 6.0 lbm material to lbm air (at standard temperature and pressure).
The additive employed depends on the contaminant targeted. By way of example, an alkaline material, such as lime or a bicarbonate, can be used to control emissions of sulfur oxides (SOx), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and hydrofluoric acid (HF). Powdered activated carbon (“PAC”) can be used to control a variety of contaminants, such as gaseous heavy metals dioxins, furans, mercury, and hydrocarbons. Sodium esquicarbonate (trona) can be used to control emissions of sulfur oxides (SOx), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and hydrofluoric acid (HF). Halogens and halides can be used to facilitate control mercury emissions. Metal oxides, such as magnesium oxide or magnesium hydroxide, can be used to control acid gas emissions. Sodium carbonate (“soda ash”) can be used to control particulate and acid gas emissions.
Although the carrier gas for the additive can be any substantially inert gas (relative to the additive), a common carrier gas is air. Typically, the carrier gas includes a minor amount, more typically no more than about 400 ppmv vol. %, and even more typically no more than about 390 ppmv of an additive reactive component, such as carbon dioxide, that reacts with the additive. For example, carbon dioxide reacts with lime to produce calcium carbonate.
While not wishing to be bound by any theory, for lime additives the formation of carbonate scale on a metal surface is believed to follow a specific sequence of stages. An induction period initiates the scale accumulation. “Induction” is the moment at which the carbonate starts to nucleate and the entrained carbonate particles start to deposit on the interiors surfaces of the additive introduction system. The deposition is affected by the level of carbonate in the carrier gas, surface temperature, material flow rate, surface configuration, and surface composition. For scale to form on the metal surfaces of the mixing and delivery systems 308 and 320, carbonate must impinge upon, stick to, and subsequently bond to the metal surfaces. Once attached to the surface, carbonate bonding will strengthen over time, significantly affected by the thermal environment, surface temperature, and carrier gas temperature. The scale can be subjected to dehydration, encouraged through conductive heating originating from the metal surfaces of the system.
It is believed that carbonate deposition in pneumatic conveying systems can be ameliorated by adherence to system-wide thermal management. Thermal management of the system can retard the growth and strengthening mechanisms of carbonate and reduce the potential for the system to foul. Thermal management of the system comprises thermal management of the carrier gas and the temperature of the mixing and delivery system components 312 and 320.
Thermal management by the additive introduction system 138 is discussed in detail below.
A number of design criteria are relevant to inhibiting or eliminating scaling. Preferably, the parts of the additive introduction system conveying the additive are maintained at a temperature of commonly less than about 95° F. and even more commonly less than about 90° F. to assure a relatively slow rate of carbonate formation, given the unavoidable presence of carbon dioxide in the carrier gas.
While not wishing to be bound by any theory, this temperature also determines the crystalline structure of any carbonate solids formed. The crystalline structure determines the abrasiveness of the carbonate solids and therefore the resulting wear on conveying surfaces in the additive introduction system. Other unique crystalline qualities encourage the adherence of the carbonate to additive introduction system components, material accumulation, and eventual system failure. The rhombohedral prismatic (calcite) crystal structure forms below a temperature in the range of about 90 to about 95° F. while the dendritic (aragonite) crystal structure forms above this temperature. The dendritic aragonite form adheres to surfaces more aggressively than calcite (which is a smooth crystal structure). Energy management can also be important. While not wishing to be bound by any theory, higher entrained additive particle velocities result in greater degrees of turbulence and areas of (unmanaged) impingement. Turbulence and impingement can generate localized heat. High velocity fluids can self-generate heat through surface friction. The resulting localized heating can accelerate carbonate particle and scale formation. To reduce localized heating, the additive introduction system should maintain laminar flow.
Referring to
The treated carrier gas 308 typically has a temperature typically below about 95° F., more typically in the range of from about 75 to about 125° F., more typically in the range of from about 85 to about 115° F., and even more typically in the range of from about 85 to about 95° F., a total pressure of at least about 25 psi, more typically of at least about 50 psi, and even more typically ranging from about 60 to about 200 psi, a relative humidity of no more than about 10%, more typically of no more than about 5%, and even more typically of no more than about 1%, and a dew point of less than about 30° F., more typically of no more than about 0° F., even more typically of no more than about −25° F., and even more typically of no more than about −40° F. As will be appreciated, the dew point is inversely proportional to the gas pressure. Higher gas pressures cause more moisture to condense.
The compressor 404 can be any type of gas compressor. The compressor 404 can be open, hermetic, or semi-hermetic. Suitable compressor types include positive displacement and dynamic compressors. Positive displacement compressors include reciprocating (e.g., single or double acting or diaphragm compressors) or rotary (e.g., lobe, liquid ring, screw, scroll, and vane compressors). The compressor can be an oil-free compressor, thereby eliminating the optional oil mist eliminator 408. The degree of compression of the carrier gas (air) relative to atmospheric pressure typically ranges from about 1.10:1 to about 1.60:1 and even more typically from about 1.20:1 to about 1.35:1. The after cooler 406 can be any suitable cooling device. Examples include air conditioner, gas cooler, heat exchanger (using a heat exchange medium), radiator (commonly with a fan), thermoelectric chiller, vortex cooled chiller, venturi vortex cooler, and other types of gas cooling devices or surfaces.
The oil mist eliminator or removal device 408 is used when the compressor experiences a significant amount of oil leakage or slip. The device 408 removes most, if not all, of the oil mist from the compressed carrier gas 405 to form a demisted carrier gas 409. An exemplary oil mist eliminator is a coalescent filter.
The compressed gas dryer 412 can be any suitable gas dryer, such as a single tower deliquescent dryer, refrigerated and regenerative compressed air dryer, natural gas and biogas dryer, dessicant, adsorbent and deliquescent desiccant, and dehumidifier.
The combination of a compressor 404 followed by a compressed gas dryer 412 to remove a significant percentage of the moisture from the carrier gas can provide unexpected and surprising benefits. The combination commonly removes most, if not all, more commonly at least about 75%, and even more commonly at least about 90% of the moisture in the carrier gas, thereby making the carrier gas less capable of retaining heat energy. Removal of the moisture therefore simplifies maintaining the compressed air in the desired temperature range.
The substantial benefit that can be realized from moisture removal is depicted in
An alternative carrier gas treatment system 304 is shown in
Referring to
The total pressure of the compressed carrier gas typically ranges from about 7.5 to about 9.6 bar.
The demisted gas 409 (which may alternatively be the compressed carrier gas 405 or cooled compressed carrier gas 407) is treated by the carbon dioxide separator 1600 to produce a treated carrier gas 1604 and carbon dioxide rich stream 1608. The carbon dioxide separator 1600 generally removes at least about 50%, more typically at least most, more typically at least about 75%, more typically at least about 85% and even more typically at least about 95% of the carbon dioxide from the demisted gas 409 (which may alternatively be the compressed carrier gas 405 or cooled compressed carrier gas 407) and concentrates the removed carbon dioxide in the carbon dioxide rich stream 1608. Commonly, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the treated carrier gas 1604 is less than the concentrations in the carbon dioxide rich stream 1608 and the gas 304, more commonly no more than about 175 ppm, more commonly no more than about 60 ppm, more commonly no more than about 30 ppm, and even more commonly no more than about 15 ppm. Stated another way, carbon dioxide has a partial vapor pressure in the treated carrier gas 1604 typically less than the carbon dioxide partial pressure in the carbon dioxide rich stream 1608 and the gas 304, typically of no more than about 0.015 bar, more typically from about 0.06 to about 0.015 bar, and even more typically from about 0.02 to about 0.006 bar. Commonly, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the carbon dioxide rich stream 1608 may be determined using conservation of mass relationships.
The carbon dioxide separator 1600 can be any suitable device for removing carbon dioxide from a gas stream, such as air. These devices can be used in the range of pressures over which most gas compressors deliver compressed gas (which pressure range is typically from about 6.5 to about 11.5 bar). As will be appreciated, by one of ordinary skill in the art, suitable devices generally fall into the two major categories of membrane- and desiccant-based systems. Exemplary devices include pressure swing adsorption devices, sorbent (e.g., desiccant) based systems, selective membranes for removing CO2 molecules from the gas stream, and/or cryogenic separation (which produces a substantially liquid carbon dioxide-rich stream). The carbon dioxide separator 1600 is commonly incorporated into the system as an inline CO2 removal device downstream of the motive air compressor 404 to remove typically most, if not all, of the CO2 prior to the compressed gas being expanded and contacted with the additive. The CO2-free treated carrier gas 1604 then conveys the additive 132 into the duct and, in the absence of CO2, cannot react to form carbonate scale in the additive introduction system 138 regardless of system moisture and temperature levels.
The efficacy of removing carbon dioxide from the compressed carrier gas 405 can obviate the need for one or more of the other components, namely the after cooler 406, oil mist eliminator 408, and even the gas compressor itself 404. In other words, a blower or other gas pressurizing device can be used to provide a motive force to the carrier gas.
The mixing system 312 includes a treated carrier gas 308 manifold inlet 600, additive-containing fluid 316 manifold outlet 604, additive particle hopper 608, feed metering mechanism 612, and manifold 624 and introduces additive particles 628 into the treated carrier gas 308 to form an additive-containing fluid 316. The metering mechanism, in one configuration, is a rotary valve but can be any suitable feeding mechanism, such as a screw feeder or rotary air lock.
The mixing system 312 uses adiabatic expansion of the compressed carrier gas to further cool and remove moisture from the carrier gas. Conventional additive introduction systems use large conveying lines that require more space and manual manipulation when switching gas streams. Compared to a conventional additive introduction system, the mixing system 312 uses a much smaller compressed air conduit 616 up to the point of metering. Typically, the diameter of the conduit 616 is no more than about 2 inches and even more typically ranges from about ½″ to about 1½″ inches. The cross-sectional area of the conduit 616 is commonly no more than about 3.14 in2 and even more commonly ranges from about 0.19 in2 to about 1.77 in2.
The conduit cross-sectional area normal to carrier gas flow gradually expands as a result of inclined or arcuate surface 620 to a much larger cross-sectional area. The gradual expansion inhibits turbulence in the gas flow. The expanded flow cross sectional area in the mixing system is selected to provide a flow velocity at the manifold outlet 604 sufficient to entrain the additive particles. The superficial operating gas flow velocity is typically at least the saltation velocity plus qualification for the particle slip velocity, more typically ranges from about −54% to about 154% of the saltation velocity plus qualification for the particle slip velocity, and even more typically ranges from about 115% to about 125% of the saltation velocity plus qualification for the particle slip velocity. By way of example, the target superficial gas flow velocity, for a desired particle mass flow rate of 2000 lb/hr for a 32 micrometer (um) particle being conveyed in a 3-inch ID pipe and a conveying fluid temperature of 90° F., ranges from about 828 fpm to about 2773 fpm, and more typically ranges from about 1980 fpm to about 2250 fpm. The pressure of the carrier gas in the manifold typically drops to a pressure of no more than about 15 psig and more typically ranging from about 2 to about 5 psig. The flow cross sectional expansion from inlet conduit 616 to outlet 604 is typically at least about 300%, more typically ranges from about 300% to about 1600. As a result of the flow area expansion, the carrier gas flow velocity decreases.
Referring to
Compared to conventional rotary valves in additive introduction systems, the rotary valve 700 has a longer length for a more uniform additive particle dispersion in the carrier gas. Referring to
The compartments 704 of the rotary valve 700 are differently configured than rotary valves of the prior art.
The compartments of a circular rotary valve are, as shown, typically triangular in shape. By decreasing the pocket volume (by modifying the void geometry to a parallelogram versus a triangle) additive particles are less likely to become packed and stuck in the vane since, as the parallelogram-shaped vane/pocket is evacuated, the additive particles are normal to the void and gravity facilitates additive particle movement.
Using a positive (or negative) pressure manifold at the exit of the rotary valve can inhibit the carrier gas from contacting the vanes. Air contact with the vane is disadvantageous because air mixed with additive particles can result in increased abrasion to the vanes as well as issues with additive particle packing (as is the case with a blow-through style rotary valve). Additionally, any moisture or oil impurities will also be in contact with the vane surface. Since the positive (or negative) pressure manifold is below the rotary valve it allows the additive particles to be removed by gravity.
Returning to
Referring to
Referring to
The use of a linear manifold for distribution to the lances reduces the amount of additive particle impingement while allowing sufficient material partitioning and minimizing substantially energy losses to the walls of the delivery system. The manifold 1000 begins at the first point of additive material partitioning. A low degree of branch at the wye splits, reducing localized thermal loading due to impingement of the solids carried by the additive-containing gas 316 on the center of the wye and subsequent energy transfer to the system components. Reduction in impingement and subsequent localized thermal increase combine to minimize carbonate buildup at this point in the system. The use of passive portioning or eccentric components to manipulate material flow, movement and/or distribution within the linear manifold and manifold system is also contemplated.
In one configuration, each of the lances 1004 has a cooling sheath to reduce and maintain the temperature of the lance interior and therefore the additive-containing fluid to acceptable levels. As noted above with lime additives, a fluid temperature greater than about 95° F. can accelerate carbonate formation. By maintaining the lances at air and surface temperatures less than about 95° F. formation of scale in the lances, which are exposed to duct temperatures (typically at least about 300° F.), can be substantially inhibited. The cooling sheath can have any suitable heat exchange configuration, such as that shown in
In one configuration shown in
In another embodiment, materials of construction are used by the additive introduction system to inhibit carbonate build-up. Materials of construction have been observed to have a direct effect on the control of carbonate build-up, which can lead to system fouling. Metallic cations (such as Zn(II)) have been observed to mitigate carbonate scale/crystallization fouling in industrial heat transfer applications. Use of specific materials or coatings, have been shown to be effective in reducing scale formation. The use of zinc plating, a coating of inert polymers, or a ceramic coating on internal additive introduction system surfaces suspected of being impinged by conveyed material is believed to lead to reduced carbonate formation.
Carbonate precipitates become harder over time. Regular pneumatic cleaning to remove small amounts of carbonate precipitates agglomerated additive deposits that have formed can prevent the precipitated or agglomerated material from becoming “scale” which would require mechanical or other type of cleaning. Conventional additive introduction systems use pinch valves to isolate injection array components. These types of valves show increased wear due to abrasion, resulting in increased maintenance and decreased system availability.
In one configuration, the cleaning system involves a short duration shutdown of additive particle delivery to the mixing and delivery systems 312 and 320, while the carrier gas remains in-service. During the additive conveyance shutdown, various portions of the injection array are isolated and preventatively cleared of substantially all of the residing material using compressed carrier gas. The cleaning system 320 uses manual and/or multiple motor operated valves (which are typically ball valves) in conjunction with an automated controller 1400 (
The configuration will now be discussed with reference to
In step 1500, the controller 1400 (which includes a processor and computer readable medium) identifies an instance of a stimulus. The stimulus can be, for example, passage of a selected time interval, a flow resistance measured across the mixing and/or delivery systems 312 and 320, and the like.
In response, the controller 1400, in step 1504, shuts off the additive supply (e.g., shuts off the rotary valve 612) while keeping the carrier gas “on” and flowing through the mixing and delivery systems 312 and 320. The carrier gas is flowed through the systems for a determined period of time to purge the systems.
In step 1508, the controller 1400 isolates a selected branch/lance of the delivery system 320. For example, lance 1004a is fluidly isolated by closing valves 1408, 1412, and 1436 while leaving valves 1404 and 1432 open.
In step 1512, the controller 1400 closes valves 1432 and 1444 and opens valve 1440 to place the selected lance 1004a in fluid communication with a first sensor 1452 (which is commonly open to the atmosphere). The first sensor 1452 then measures and provides to the controller 1400 the magnitude and/or direction of gas flow or the pressure differential of the duct draw (or ‘blow’ for positive pressure injection locations).
In decision diamond 1516, the controller 1400 determines whether the flow through the selected lance 1004a is acceptable. This can be done by comparing the duct draw measurement against historical measurements.
When the flow is not acceptable, the controller 1400, in step 1520, closes valve 1448 and opens valve 1444 to cause a determined amount of purge gas to pass, commonly in short bursts, through the second sensor 1456 and selected lance 1004a. The bursts can be formed by rapidly opening and closing a valve, such as valve 1444. The bursts can have a different characteristic (e.g., pressure, composition, temperature, and/or flow velocity) compared to the additive-containing fluid. The second sensor 1456 measures the purge gas flow volume through the lance 1004a. Valve 1444 is then closed and valve 1448 opened to measure the duct draw.
In decision diamond 1524, the controller 1400 determines whether the flow through the selected lance 1004a is acceptable.
When the flow is not acceptable, the controller 1400 returns to and repeats step 1516.
When the flow is acceptable, the controller 1400, in step 1528, selects a next branch/lance and returns to step 1508.
When each branch 1008 and 1012 and all lances 1004a-f have been cleaned, valve 1440 is closed and valves 1432, 1404, 1408, 1412, 1416, 1420, 1424, 1428, and 1436 are opened. The rotary valve 612 is activated, and the mixing and delivery systems returned to operation.
In another embodiment, the additive material collected in the mixing and delivery systems is removed chemically by a chemical cleaner. The chemical cleaner may be flowed through the mixing and delivery systems in the liquid or gas phases. Typically, the flow of the additive and carrier gas is terminated during chemical cleaning. In one configuration, the additive supply is terminated while the carrier gas supply is continued. The chemical cleaner is added to the flow of carrier gas, which removes the unwanted additive or additive derivative deposits. Over time and despite maintaining the mixing and delivery systems dry and cool, trace amounts of carbonate can form and ultimately may degrade the ability of the systems to convey material. These precipitates are typically removed by mechanical means, which most often requires manual cleaning. This requires maintaining a trained employed to serve in this capacity, or adding this function to an existing employee's job role. It also requires mechanical cleaning, which involves exposing a worker to alkaline materials and/or carbonates.
In this embodiment, a cleaning agent, such as a dilute mineral acid, is used to react with the carbonate formation to dissolve or remove it after some preset amount of plugging or reduced flow is discovered. The mineral acid could be a scrubbing solution, which contains dissolved acid gases, such as nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides. Since the process is typically a closed system and initiated only when necessary, it serves to alleviate system downtime and contributes to the overall availability of the additive introduction system. Since the process is preferably a closed system, there can be minimal contact with personnel, reducing the risk and training required to perform this function.
The following examples are provided to illustrate certain embodiments of the invention and are not to be construed as limitations on the invention, as set forth in the appended claims. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise specified.
An evaluation of the additive introduction system and other features disclosed herein was carried out on a coal-fired electric generating unit at full scale during a three-month period. The equipment employed during the evaluation was configured as disclosed herein and consisted primarily of a storage silo, a supplemental storage vessel, a compressed air motive package, modified rotary air lock, conveying structures, a linear distribution manifold with cleaning systems and injection lance array.
The evaluation was carried out to study the effectiveness of the additive induction system, the carrier gas treatment system, the mixing system, the delivery system and the cleaning system. The resulting efficiency and reliability of the disclosed components were evaluated in addition to the relative to effect of additive addition on air heater pressure drop, the effectiveness of the additive addition on particulate pollutant control, additive addition on heat transfer structure.
Additive addition was carried out initially at low mass feed rates (300-400 lb/hr) for limited duration (3-4 hours). As reliability of the disclosed components was established, additive addition rates were subsequently increased after verifying no adverse impacts on host unit operations (e.g., air heater pressure drop, particulate matter emissions, duct opacity, etc.). In the final phase of the evaluation, additive addition was increased to nearly 2000 lb/hour and sustained for 30 days. The duration of continuous, failure-free operations was 38 days.
A postmortem evaluation of disclosed components revealed that the system operated as conceived during design. Specific evaluation of typically high-failure areas showed no indication of wear, plugging or caking due to carbonate buildup.
A number of variations and modifications of the disclosure can be used. It would be possible to provide for some features of the disclosure without providing others.
For example in one alternative embodiment, external cooling or insulation is employed to substantially minimize the effects of heating from the surrounding environment (e.g., sun or some nearby process heat input). External cooling can be done by external cooling or insulation on the conveyance line.
In other embodiments, thermal management of the conveying system components is done by proximity to soil (earth) or installation in a trench or “covered pipe tray” to facilitate reduced thermal loading of system components.
In other embodiments, a venturi cooler is positioned downstream of the compressed gas dryer.
The present disclosure, in various aspects, embodiments, and configurations, includes components, methods, processes, systems and/or apparatus substantially as depicted and described herein, including various aspects, embodiments, configurations, subcombinations, and subsets thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand how to make and use the various aspects, embodiments, and configurations, after understanding the present disclosure. The present disclosure, in various aspects, embodiments, and configurations, includes providing devices and processes in the absence of items not depicted and/or described herein or in various aspects, embodiments, and configurations hereof, including in the absence of such items as may have been used in previous devices or processes, e.g., for improving performance, achieving ease and\or reducing cost of implementation.
The foregoing discussion of the disclosure has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the disclosure to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing Detailed Description for example, various features of the disclosure are grouped together in one or more, aspects, embodiments, and configurations for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. The features of the aspects, embodiments, and configurations of the disclosure may be combined in alternate aspects, embodiments, and configurations other than those discussed above. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed disclosure requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed aspects, embodiments, and configurations. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate preferred embodiment of the disclosure.
Moreover, though the description of the disclosure has included description of one or more aspects, embodiments, or configurations and certain variations and modifications, other variations, combinations, and modifications are within the scope of the disclosure, e.g., as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative aspects, embodiments, and configurations to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/645,138, filed Oct. 4, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,784,757, which (a) is a continuation-in-part under 35 USC 120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/045,076, filed Mar. 10, 2011 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,383,071 with an issue date of Feb. 26, 2013, which claims the benefits of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/542,972, filed Nov. 19, 2010, and Ser. No. 61/312,453, filed Mar. 10, 2010, and (b) claims the benefits of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/415,480, filed Oct. 4, 2011, which are each incorporated herein by this reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 174348 | Brown | Mar 1876 | A |
| 202092 | Breed | Apr 1878 | A |
| 208011 | Eaton | Sep 1878 | A |
| 224649 | Child | Feb 1880 | A |
| 229159 | McCarty | Jun 1880 | A |
| 298727 | Case | May 1884 | A |
| 346765 | McIntyre | Aug 1886 | A |
| 347078 | White | Aug 1886 | A |
| 367014 | Wandrey et al. | Jul 1887 | A |
| 537998 | Spring et al. | Apr 1895 | A |
| 541025 | Gray | Jun 1895 | A |
| 625754 | Garland | May 1899 | A |
| 647622 | Vallet-Rogez | Apr 1900 | A |
| 685719 | Harris | Oct 1901 | A |
| 688782 | Hillery | Dec 1901 | A |
| 700888 | Battistini | May 1902 | A |
| 744908 | Dallas | Nov 1903 | A |
| 846338 | McNamara | Mar 1907 | A |
| 894110 | Bloss | Jul 1908 | A |
| 896876 | Williams | Aug 1908 | A |
| 911960 | Ellis | Feb 1909 | A |
| 945331 | Koppers | Jan 1910 | A |
| 945846 | Hughes | Jan 1910 | A |
| 1112547 | Morin | Oct 1914 | A |
| 1167471 | Barba | Jan 1916 | A |
| 1167472 | Barba | Jan 1916 | A |
| 1183445 | Foxwell | May 1916 | A |
| 1788466 | Lourens | Jan 1931 | A |
| 1955574 | Benner et al. | Apr 1934 | A |
| 1984164 | Stock | Dec 1934 | A |
| 2016821 | Nelms | Oct 1935 | A |
| 2059388 | Nelms | Nov 1936 | A |
| 2089599 | Crecelius | Aug 1937 | A |
| 2511288 | Morrell et al. | Jun 1950 | A |
| 2844112 | Muller | Jul 1958 | A |
| 3004836 | Thompson | Oct 1961 | A |
| 3194629 | Dreibelbis et al. | Jul 1965 | A |
| 3288576 | Pierron et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3332755 | Kukin | Jul 1967 | A |
| 3437476 | Dotson et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3557020 | Shindo et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3599610 | Spector | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3628727 | Gjerde | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3662523 | Revoir et al. | May 1972 | A |
| 3725530 | Kawase et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3764496 | Hultman et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3803803 | Raduly et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3823676 | Cook et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
| 3838190 | Birke et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3849267 | Hilgen et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3849537 | Allgulin | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3896746 | Pirsh | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3907674 | Roberts et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3932494 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3947354 | Swanson et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3956458 | Anderson | May 1976 | A |
| 3961020 | Seki | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3970434 | Gasior et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3974254 | de la Cuadra Herrera et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4040802 | Deitz et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4042664 | Cardwell et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4051316 | Wing et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4057398 | Bennett | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4075282 | Storp et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4083783 | Wing et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4089507 | Arai et al. | May 1978 | A |
| 4094777 | Sugier et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4101631 | Ambrosini et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4115518 | Delmon et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4133759 | Ikeda et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4148613 | Myers | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4173454 | Heins | Nov 1979 | A |
| 4174373 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
| 4196173 | Dejong et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4226601 | Smith | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4230460 | Maust, Jr. | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4233274 | Allgulin | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4238329 | Zievers | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4272250 | Burk, Jr. et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4276431 | Schnegg et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4280817 | Chauhan et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4305726 | Brown, Jr. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4308241 | deVries | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4308242 | Horton | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4322218 | Nozaki | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4364818 | Schmid et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4372227 | Mahoney et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4377118 | Sadowski | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4377599 | Willard, Sr. | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4385891 | Ligotti | May 1983 | A |
| 4387653 | Voss | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4394354 | Joyce | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4420892 | Braun et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4427630 | Aibe et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4438709 | Borio et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4440100 | Michelfelder et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4472278 | Suzuki | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4474896 | Chao | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4498402 | Kober et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4500327 | Nishino et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4514256 | Kober et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4519807 | Nishino et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4519995 | Schrofelbauer et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4527746 | Molls et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4552076 | McCartney | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4555392 | Steinberg | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4564374 | Hofmann | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4572085 | Hepworth | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4577566 | Merrell | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4578256 | Nishino et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4582936 | Ashina et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4586443 | Burge et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4598652 | Hepworth | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4602918 | Steinberg et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4629721 | Ueno | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4668429 | Najjar | May 1987 | A |
| 4671804 | Najjar | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4693731 | Tarakad et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4706579 | Merrell | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4708853 | Matviya et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4716137 | Lewis | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4729882 | Ide et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4741278 | Franke et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4753632 | Hofmann et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4758418 | Yoo et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4764219 | Yan | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4765258 | Zauderer | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4784670 | Najjar | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4786483 | Audeh | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4796548 | Merrell et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4804521 | Rochelle et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4807542 | Dykema | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4824441 | Kindig | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4830829 | Craig, Jr. | May 1989 | A |
| 4831942 | Morimoto et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4843980 | Markham et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4873930 | Egense et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4886519 | Hayes et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4886521 | Khan | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4889698 | Moller et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4892567 | Yan | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4895603 | Semp et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4915818 | Yan | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4917862 | Kraw et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4919826 | Alzner | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4933158 | Aritsuka et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4936047 | Feldmann et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4940010 | Kubin et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4964889 | Chao | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5001994 | Morimoto et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5013358 | Ball et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5017135 | Meyer | May 1991 | A |
| 5022329 | Rackley et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5024171 | Krigmont et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5046265 | Kalb | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5049163 | Huang et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5052312 | Rackley et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5114578 | Sundstrom | May 1992 | A |
| 5116793 | Chao et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5124135 | Girrbach et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5126300 | Pinnavaia et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5137854 | Segawa et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5141724 | Audeh et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5162598 | Hutchings et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5179058 | Knoblauch et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5190566 | Sparks et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5196648 | Jones | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5202301 | McNamara | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5207164 | Breen et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5209062 | Vollenweider | May 1993 | A |
| 5238488 | Wilhelm | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5282430 | Nehls, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5288306 | Aibe et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5307743 | Jones | May 1994 | A |
| 5313915 | McDowell et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5320051 | Nehls, Jr. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5320817 | Hardwick et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5324336 | Child | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5328673 | Kaczur et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5333558 | Lees, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5336835 | McNamara | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342592 | Peter-Hoblyn et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5346674 | Weinwurm et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5350728 | Cameron et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5352647 | Suchenwirth | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5354363 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5357002 | Lezzi et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5364421 | Westby et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368617 | Kindig | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5372619 | Greinke et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5379902 | Wen et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5403548 | Aibe et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5409522 | Durham et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5435980 | Felsvang et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5447703 | Baer et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5460643 | Hasenpusch et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5505746 | Chriswell et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5505766 | Chang | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5569436 | Lerner | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571490 | Bronicki et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5575982 | Reiss et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5577910 | Holland | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5587003 | Bulow et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5607496 | Brooks | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613851 | Trawoger et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618508 | Suchenwirth et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5635150 | Coughlin | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5658487 | Carey et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5659100 | Lin | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5670122 | Zamansky et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672323 | Bhat et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5678959 | Griffard et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5679259 | Bolser | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5695726 | Lerner | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5733360 | Feldman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733516 | DeBerry | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5738834 | Deberry | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5741397 | Kraver | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5785932 | Helfritch | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5787823 | Knowles | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5795159 | Ralls et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797742 | Fraker | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5809911 | Feizollahi | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5810910 | Ludwig et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5819672 | Radway et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5827352 | Altman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5855649 | Durham et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5871703 | Alix et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5885076 | Ralls et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888256 | Morrison | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5893943 | Durham et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5894806 | Smyrniotis et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897688 | Voogt et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5899678 | Thomson et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5900042 | Mendelsohn et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5910292 | Alvarez, Jr. et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5972066 | Lehtinen | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5989506 | Markovs | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6022216 | Cattani | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6024931 | Hanulik | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027551 | Hwang et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027552 | Ruck et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6083289 | Ono et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6083306 | Cattani | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6117403 | Alix et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6132692 | Alix et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6136281 | Meischen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6136749 | Gadkaree et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139751 | Bogaert et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6165366 | Sarangapani | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6200543 | Allebach et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6206685 | Zamansky et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6221001 | Comer et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6240859 | Jones, Jr. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248217 | Biswas et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6250235 | Oehr et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6258334 | Gadkaree et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6258456 | Meyer | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267802 | Baldrey et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6284199 | Downs et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6284208 | Thomassen | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6328939 | Amrhein | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6368511 | Weissenberg et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6372187 | Madden et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6375909 | Dangtran et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6401449 | Hofmann et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6447740 | Caldwell et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6471506 | Zamansky et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6475451 | Leppin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6475461 | Ohsaki et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6484651 | Shepard, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6514907 | Tsutsumi et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6521021 | Pennline et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6524371 | El-Shoubary et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6528030 | Madden et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6533842 | Maes et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6547874 | Eck et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6558454 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6582497 | Maes et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6589318 | El-Shoubary et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6595848 | Robinson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6610263 | Pahlman et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6613110 | Sanyal | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6638347 | El-Shoubary et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6638485 | Iida et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6649082 | Hayasaka et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6719828 | Lovell et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6726888 | Lanier et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6729248 | Johnson et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6732055 | Bagepalli et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6737031 | Beal et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6773471 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6787742 | Kansa et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6790420 | Breen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6790429 | Ciampi | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6808692 | Oehr | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6827837 | Minter | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6841513 | El-Shoubary et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6848374 | Srinivasachar et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6864008 | Otawa et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6878358 | Vosteen et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6916762 | Shibuya et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6939523 | D'Alesandro | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6942840 | Broderick | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6945925 | Pooler et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6953494 | Nelson, Jr. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6960329 | Sellakumar | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6962617 | Simpson | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6969494 | Herbst | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6972120 | Holste et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6974562 | Ciampi et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6974564 | Biermann et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6975975 | Fasca | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7118720 | Mendelsohn et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7141091 | Chang | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7151199 | Martens et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7153481 | Bengtsson et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7156959 | Herbst | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7250387 | Durante et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7312300 | Mitchell | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7331533 | Bayer et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7332002 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7361209 | Durham et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7381380 | Herbst | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7381387 | Lissianski et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7384615 | Boardman et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7387719 | Carson et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7413719 | Digdon | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7416137 | Hagen et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7435286 | Olson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7452392 | Nick et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7473303 | Higgins et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7476324 | Ciampi et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7479215 | Carson et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7479263 | Chang et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7494632 | Klunder | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7507083 | Comrie | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7514052 | Lissianski et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7517445 | Carson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7517511 | Schofield | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7524473 | Lindau et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7531708 | Carson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7544339 | Lissianski et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7779777 | Shiobara et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7862646 | Carruthers et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 8124036 | Baldrey et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8221532 | Carruthers et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8372362 | Durham et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8383071 | Dillon et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8439989 | Baldrey et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8784757 | Dillon et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 20020068030 | Nolan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020114749 | Cole | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020121482 | Ciampi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030065236 | Vosteen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030079411 | Kansa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030164309 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030166988 | Hazen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030206843 | Nelson, Jr. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040013589 | Vosteen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040016377 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040129607 | Slater et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040208809 | D'Alesandro | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040256247 | Carson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050020828 | Therkelsen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050026008 | Heaton et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050039598 | Srinivasachar et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050056548 | Minter | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090379 | Shibuya et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132880 | Chang | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20060027488 | Gauthier | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060029531 | Breen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060051270 | Brunette | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060124444 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060185226 | McDonald et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060204418 | Chao et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060205592 | Chao et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060266391 | Wang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070051239 | Holmes et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156288 | Wroblewski et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167309 | Olson | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179056 | Baek et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070180990 | Downs et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184394 | Comrie | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20080060519 | Maly et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080069749 | Liu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107579 | Downs et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080115704 | Berry et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080121142 | Comrie et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080233238 | Roney et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090007785 | Kimura et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090031929 | Boardman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090047199 | Arrol et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081092 | Yang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090104097 | Dunson, Jr. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090117019 | Comrie | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090136401 | Yang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20100068111 | Walsh, Jr. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100221166 | Muggli | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110206586 | Mooney | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20130139683 | Hanson et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20140030178 | Martin | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140202497 | Kreis et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20150013603 | Morioka et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2003220713 | Feb 2004 | AU |
| 1140572 | Feb 1983 | CA |
| 2150529 | Dec 1995 | CA |
| 2418578 | Aug 2003 | CA |
| 2435474 | Jan 2004 | CA |
| 1052838 | Jul 1991 | CN |
| 2548845 | May 1976 | DE |
| 2713197 | Oct 1978 | DE |
| 2917273 | Nov 1980 | DE |
| 3615759 | Nov 1987 | DE |
| 3628963 | Mar 1988 | DE |
| 3711503 | Oct 1988 | DE |
| 3918292 | Apr 1990 | DE |
| 4218672 | Aug 1993 | DE |
| 4308388 | Oct 1993 | DE |
| 4422661 | Jan 1996 | DE |
| 19520127 | Dec 1996 | DE |
| 19850054 | May 2000 | DE |
| 10233173 | Jul 2002 | DE |
| 60019603 | Apr 2006 | DE |
| 0009699 | Apr 1980 | EP |
| 0115634 | Aug 1984 | EP |
| 0208036 | Jan 1987 | EP |
| 0220075 | Apr 1987 | EP |
| 0254697 | Jan 1988 | EP |
| 0433674 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 0433677 | Jun 1991 | EP |
| 0435848 | Jul 1991 | EP |
| 0628341 | Dec 1994 | EP |
| 0666098 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0709128 | May 1996 | EP |
| 0794240 | Sep 1997 | EP |
| 0908217 | Apr 1999 | EP |
| 1213046 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1199354 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 1271053 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 1386655 | Feb 2004 | EP |
| 1570894 | Sep 2005 | EP |
| 1671706 | Jun 2006 | EP |
| 1394547 | Apr 1965 | FR |
| 1394847 | Apr 1965 | FR |
| 1121845 | Jul 1968 | GB |
| 11-94234 | Jun 1905 | JP |
| 49-53590 | May 1974 | JP |
| 49-53591 | May 1974 | JP |
| 49-53592 | May 1974 | JP |
| 49-53593 | May 1974 | JP |
| 49-53594 | May 1974 | JP |
| 49-66592 | Jun 1974 | JP |
| 51-5586 | Jan 1976 | JP |
| 59-10343 | Jan 1984 | JP |
| 59-76537 | May 1984 | JP |
| 59-160534 | Sep 1984 | JP |
| 63-100918 | May 1988 | JP |
| 09-239265 | Sep 1997 | JP |
| 10-109016 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| 2000-197811 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| 2000-205525 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| 2001-347131 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2002-355031 | Dec 2002 | JP |
| 2003-065522 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2004-066229 | Mar 2004 | JP |
| 2005-230810 | Sep 2005 | JP |
| 2004-0010276 | Jan 2004 | KR |
| WO 8604602 | Aug 1986 | WO |
| WO 9109977 | Jul 1991 | WO |
| WO 9630318 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 9717480 | May 1997 | WO |
| WO 9815357 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 9958228 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO 0128787 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO 0138787 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 03093518 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 2005092477 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| 2003-05568 | Jul 2004 | ZA |
| Entry |
|---|
| “ADA-ES Tests New Boiler Product,” Coal Daily, Apr. 18, 2000, 1 page. |
| “Bromine” webpage, http://www2.gtz.de/uvp/publika/English/vo1318.htm, printed Sep. 14, 2006, 4 pages. |
| “Burning PRB Coals ADA Environmental Offers Flyash Solutions,” Western Coal Advisory, Summer/Autumn 1999, 1 page. |
| “Chlorine” webpage, http://www2.gtz.de/uvp/publika/English/vo1324.htm, printed Sep. 14, 2006, 4 pages. |
| “Cyclone Furnaces,” Chapter 10 of Steam/Its Generation and Use, Babcock & Wilcox, 1972, 38th Edition, pp. 10-1 to 10-8. |
| “DOE Announces Further Field Testing of Advanced Mercury Control Technologies, Six Projects Selected in Round 2 to Address Future Power Plant Mercury Reduction Initiatives,” TECHNews From the National Energy Technology Laboratory, Nov. 5, 2004, available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/TechNews/tn—mercury-control.html, printed on Jun. 3, 2009, pp. 1-2. |
| “DrägerSenor C12—68 08 865 Data Sheet,” Drager Product Information, Apr. 1997, pp. 1-6 (with English translation). |
| “Enhanced Mercury Control: KNX™ Coal Additive Technology,” Alstom Power Inc., printed Aug. 3, 2006, 1 page. |
| “Evaluation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control at Great River Energy Coal Creek Station,” ADA Environmental Solutions, Nov. 16-20, 2003 Final Report, Electric Power Research Institute, issued Mar. 3, 2004, 32 pages. |
| “File: Static Mixer Flow Division.png,” Wikipedia, Mar. 24, 2009, Attribution: Ambanmba at en.wikipedia, available at www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Static—Mixer—Flow—Division.png, 3 pages. |
| “Fuel Ash Effects on Boiler Design and Operation,” Chapter 21 of Steam/Its Generation and Use, Babcock & Wilcox Company, 2005, 41st Edition, pp. 21-1 to 21-27. |
| “Fuel-ash Effects on Boiler Design and Operation,” Chapter 15 of Steam/Its Generation and Use, Babcock and Wilcox Company, 1972, 38th Edition, pp. 15-1 to 15-26. |
| “Gas Phase Filtration,” Vaihtoilma White Air Oy, date unknown, 3 pages. |
| “Handling Hydrated Lime from a Lime Suppliers Perspective,” Workshop 25, 2010 APC Round Table & Expo Presentation, Reinhold Enviromental Ltd., Jul. 18-20, 2010, 33 pages. |
| “Impregnated Activated Carbon,” Products and Technologies Website, as early as 1999, available at http://www.calgoncarbon.com/product/impregnated.html, printed on Dec. 18, 1999, p. 1. |
| “Incineration: Taking the heat out of complex waste,” Bayer Industry Services website, as early as 2005, available at http://web.archive.org/web/20060318115553/www.entsorgung.bayer.com/index.cfm?PAGE—ID=2 99, pp. 1-2, printed on Jun. 4, 2009. |
| “Iron- and Steelmaking,” date unknown, pp. 646-660. |
| “Protecting Human Health. Mercury Poisoning,” US EPA Website, as early as Oct. 8, 1999, available at http://www.epa.gov/region02/health/mercury/, printed on Feb. 5, 2002, pp. 1-4. |
| “Static Mixer,” Wikipedia, 2013, available at www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static—mixer, 3 pages. |
| “Static Mixer (Engineering Design Guideline),” KLM Technology Group, 2012, available at www.klmtechgroup.com, 24 pages. |
| “Texas Genco, EPRI, and URS Corporation Test Innovative Mercury Control Method at Limestone Station—Technology Aims to Capture More Mercury from Power Plant Exhaust,” News Release, Jan. 11, 2005, available at http://amptest.epri.com/corporate/discover—epri/news/2005/011105—mercury.html, printed on Apr. 24, 2009, pp. 1-2. |
| Aldrich Chemical Catalog, Aldrich Chemical Co., Inc., 1996, pp. 863-866. |
| Anders et al., “Selenium in Coal-Fired Steam Plant Emissions,” Environmental Science & Technology, 1975, vol. 9, No. 9, pp. 856-858. |
| Bansal et al., Active Carbon, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1989, pp. 1-3, 24-29, 391-394, 457. |
| Benson et al., “Air Toxics Research Needs: Workshop Findings,” Proceedings of the 1993 So2 Control Symposium, U.S. EPA, vol. 2, Session 6A, Aug. 24-27, 1993, pp. 1-17, Boston, MA. |
| Biswas et al., “Control of Toxic Metal Emissions from Combustors Using Sorbents: A Review,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., Feb. 1998, vol. 48, pp. 113-127. |
| Biswas et al., “Introduction to the Air & Waste Management Association's 29th Annual Critical Review,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Jun. 1999, pp. 1-2. |
| Bloom, “Mercury Speciation in Flue Gases: Overcoming the Analytical Difficulties,” presented at EPRI Conference, Managing Hazardous Air Pollutants, State of the Arts, Washington D.C., Nov. 1991, pp. 148-160. |
| Brown et al., “Mercury Measurement and Its Control: What We Know, Have Learned, and Need to Further investigate,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc, pp. 1-97 (Jun. 1999). |
| Buschmann et al., “The KNX™ Coal Additive Technology a Simple Solution for Mercury Emissions Control,” Alstom Power Environment, Dec. 2005, pp. 1-7. |
| Bustard et al., “Full-Scale Evaluation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control on Coal-Fired Power Plants” Air Quality III, ADA Environmental Solutions, LLC (Arlington, VA) (Sep. 12, 2002). |
| Calgon Carbon product and bulletin webpages, 11 pages (undated). |
| Carey et al., “Factors Affecting Mercury Control in Utility Flue Gas Using Activated Carbon,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., Dec. 1998, vol. 48, pp. 1166-1174. |
| De Vito et al., “Sampling and Analysis of Mercury in Combustion Flue Gas,” Presented at the Second International Conference on Managing Hazardous Air Pollutants, Washington, DC, Jul. 13-15, 1993, pp. VII39-VII-65. |
| Declaration of Richard Schlager; Sep. 18, 2002. |
| Donnet et al., eds., Carbon Black: Science and Technology, 2nd Edition, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1993, pp. 182-187, 218-219. |
| Dunham et al., “Investigation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control in Coal-Fired Boilers,” Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota (Sep. 10, 1998). |
| Durham et al., “Full-Scale Evaluation of Mercury Control by Injecting Activated Carbon Upstream of ESPS,” Air Quality IV Conference, ADA Environmental Solutions (Littleton, Colorado) (Feb. 10, 2003). |
| Edwards et al., “A Study of Gas-Phase Mercury Speciation Using Detailed Chemical Kinetics,” in Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, vol. 51, Jun. 2001, pp. 869-877. |
| Fabian et al., “How Bayer incinerates wastes,” Hydrocarbon Processing, Apr. 1979, pp. 183-192. |
| Felsvang et al., “Activated Carbon Injection in Spray Dryer/ESP/FF for Mercury and Toxics Control” (Feb. 10, 1993). |
| Felsvang, K. et al., “Air Toxics Control by Spray Dryer,” Presented at the 1993 SO2 Control Symposium, Boston, MA, Aug. 24-27, 1993, 16 pages. |
| Felsvang, K. et al., “Control of Air Toxics by Dry FGDSystems,” Power-Gen '92 Conference, 5th International Conference & Exhibition for the Power Generating Industries, Orlando, FL, Nov. 17-19, 1992, pp. 189-208. |
| Galbreath et al., “Mercury Transformations in Coal Combustion Flue Gas,” Fuel Processing Technology, 1999, vol. 65-66, pp. 291-292. |
| Gale et al., “Mercury Speciation as a Function of Flue Gas Chlorine Content and Composition in a 1 Mw Semi-Industrial Scale Coal-Fired Facility,” In Proceedings of the Mega Symposium and Air & Waste Management Association's Specialty Conference, Washington, DC, May 19-22, 2003, Paper 28, 19 pages. |
| Gale, “Mercury Adsorption and Oxidation Kinetics in Coal-Fired Flue Gas,” Proceedings of the 30th International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization & Fuel Systems, 2005, pp. 979-990. |
| Gale, “Mercury Control with Calcium-Based Sorbents and Oxidizing Agents,” Final Report of Southern Research Institute, Jul. 2005, 137 pages. |
| Gale, “Mercury Control with Calcium-Based Sorbents and Oxidizing Agents,” Southern Research Institute, Mercury Control Technology R&D Program Review Meeting, Aug. 12-13, 2003, 25 pages. |
| Geiger et al, “Einfluβ des Schwefels auf Die Doxin—and Furanbuilding bei der Klarschlammverbrennung,” VGB Kraftwerkstechnik, 1992, vol. 72, pp. 159-165. |
| Ghorishi et al., “Effects of Fly Ash Transition Metal Content and Flue Gas HCl/SO2 Ratio on Mercury Speciation in Waste Combustion,” in Environmental Engineering Science, Nov. 2005, vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 221-231. |
| Ghorishi et al., “In-Flight Capture of Elemental Mercury by a Chlorine-Impregnated Activated Carbon,” presented at the Air & Waste Management Association's 94h Annual Meeting & Exhibition, Orlando, FL, Jun. 2001, pp. 1-14. |
| Granite et al., “Novel Sorbents for Mercury Removal from Flue Gas,” National Energy Technology Laboratory (Apr. 10, 2000). |
| Griffin, “A New Theory of Dioxin Formation in Municipal Solid Waste Combustion,” Chemosphere, 1986, vol. 15, Nos. 9-12, pp. 1987-1990. |
| Gullet, B.K. et al, “The Effect of Sorbent Injection Technologies on Emissions of Coal-Based, Based, Metallic Air Toxics,” Proceedings of the 1993 SO2 Control Symposium, vol. 2, U.S. EPA (Research Triangle Park, NC) Session 6A, Boston, MA, Aug. 24-27,1993, 26 pages. |
| Gullett, B. et al., “Bench-Scale Sorption and Desorption of Mercury with Activated Carbon,” Presented at the 1993 International Conference on Municipal Waste Combustion, Williamsburg, VA, Mar. 30-Apr. 2, 1993, pp. 903-917. |
| Gullett, B. et al., “Removal of Illinois Coal-Based Volatile Tracy Mercury,” Final Technical Report, Sep. 1, 1996 through Aug. 31, 1997. |
| Guminski, “The Br-Hg (Bromine-Mercury) System,” Journal of Phase Equilibria, Dec. 2000, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 539-543. |
| Hall et al., “Chemical Reactions of Mercury in Combustion Flue Gases,” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 56:3-14,1991. |
| Hein, K.R.G. et al., Research Report entitled, “Behavior of Mercury Emission from Coal Sewage Sludge Co-combustion Taking into Account the Gaseous Species,” Förderkennzeichen: PEF 398002, Apr. 2001 (English Abstract). |
| Henning et al., “Impregnated activated carbon for environmental protection,” Gas Separation & Purification, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., vol. 7, No. 4 (Feb. 9, 1993). |
| Hirschberg, “Static mixers for flue gas treatment applications,” Sulzer Chemtech, 2011, 11 pages. |
| Ismo et al., “Formation of Aromatic Chlorinated Compounds Catalyzed by Copper and Iron,” Chemosphere vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 2649-2662 (1997). |
| Jozewicz et al., “Bench-Scale Scale Investigation of Mechanisms of Elemental Mercury Capture by Activated Carbon,” Presented at the Second International Conference on Managing Hazardous Air Pollutants, Washington, D.C., Jul. 13-15,1993, pp. VII-85 through VII-99. |
| Kellie et al., “The Role of Coal Properties on Chemical and Physical Transformation on Mercury in Post Combustion,” presented at Air Quality IV Conference, Arlington, VA, Sep. 2003, pp. 1-14. |
| Kilgroe et al., “Fundamental Science and Engineering of Mercury Control in Coal-Fired Power Plants,” presented at Air Quality IV Conference, Arlington, VA, Sep. 2003. |
| Kobayashi, “Japan EnviroChemicals, Ltd. Overview,” Feb. 3, 2002, 3 pages. |
| Kramlich, “The Homogeneous Forcing of Mercury Oxidation to Provide Low-Cost Capture,” Abstract, University of Washington, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mar. 25, 2004, available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/04/UCR-HBCU/abstracts/Kramlich.pdf, pp. 1-2. |
| Krishnan et al., “Mercury Control by Injection of Activated Carbon and Calcium-Based Based Sorbents,” Solid Waste Management: Thermal Treatment and Waste-to-Energy Technologies, U.S. EPA and AWMA, Washington, DC, Apr. 18-21, 1995, pp. 493-504. |
| Krishnan et al., “Mercury Control in Municipal Waste Combustors and Coal Fired Utilities,” Environmental Progress, ProQuest Science Journals, Spring 1997, vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 47-53. |
| Krishnan et al., “Sorption of Elemental Mercury by Activated Carbons,” Environmental Science and Technology, 1994, vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 1506-1512. |
| Lee et al., “Mercury Control Research: Effects of Fly Ash and Flue Gas Parameters on Mercury Speciation,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Risk Management Research Laboratory and ARCADIS, as early as 1998, Geraghy & Miller, Inc., pp. 221-238, Research Triangle Park, NC. |
| Lemieux et al., “Interactions Between Bromine and Chlorine in a Pilot-Scale Hazardous Waste Incinerator,” paper presented at 1996 International Incineration Conference, Savannah, GA, May 6-10, 1996. |
| Linak et al., “Toxic Metal Emissions from Incineration: Mechanisms and Control” Progress in Energy & Combustion Science, 1993, vol. 19, pp. 145-185. |
| Lissianski et al., “Effect of Coal Blending on Mercury Removal,” presented at the Low Rank Fuels Conference, Billings, MT, Jun. 24-26, 2003, pp. 1-9. |
| Livengood et al “Enhanced Control of Mercury Emissions Through Modified Speciation,” for Presentation at the Air & Waste Management Association's 90th Meeting & Exhibition, Jun. 8-13, 1997, 14 pages. |
| Livengood et al., “Development of Mercury Control Techniques for Utility Boilers,” for Presentation at the 88th Air & Waste Management Association Annual Meeting & Exhibit, Jun. 18-23, 1995, pp. 1-14. |
| Livengood et al., “Investigation of Modified Speciation for Enhanced Control of Mercury,” Argonne National Laboratory, 1998, available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/97/97ps/ps—pdf/PS2B-9.pdf, pp. 1-15. |
| Luijk et al., “The Role of Bromine in the De Novo Synthesis in a Model Fly Ash System,” Chemosphere, 1994, vol. 28, No. 7, pp. 1299-1309. |
| Martel, K., “Brennstoff-und lastspezifische Untersuchungen zum Verhalten von Schwermetallen in Kohlenstaubfeuerungen [Fuel and load specific studies on the behavior of heavy metals in coal firing systems ],” Fortschritt-Berichte Vdi, Apr. 2000, pp. 1-240. |
| McCoy et al., “Full-Scale Mercury Sorbent Injection Testing at DTE Energy's St. Clair Station,” Paper #97, DTE Energy, as early as 2004, pp. 1-9. |
| Mills Jr., “Techline: Meeting Mercury Standards,” as early as Jun. 18, 2001, available at http://www.netl.doe/publications/press/2001/tl—mercuryel2.html, printed on Feb. 5, 2002, pp. 1-3. |
| Niksa et al., “Predicting Mercury Speciation in Coal-Derived Flue Gases,” presented at the 2003 Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium, Washington, D.C., May 2003, pp. 1-14. |
| Nucon International, Inc., “Nusorb Mersorb Family of Adsorbents for Mercury Control,” As early as Jan. 2002, 3 pages. |
| Oberacker et al., “Incinerating the Pesticide Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)—A field-Scale Trail Burn Evaluation of Environmental Performance,” Report EPA /600/D-88/198, Oct. 1988, pp. 1-11. |
| Olson et al., “An Improved Model for Flue Gas-Mercury Interactions on Activated Carbons,” presented at Mega Symposium May 21, 2003, Energy & Environmental Research Center publication, Paper # 142, pp. 1-8. |
| Olson et al., “Oxidation Kinetics and the Model for Mercury Capture on Carbon in Flue Gas,” presented at Air Quality V Conference, Sep. 21, 2005, pp. 1-7. |
| Oppenheimer et al., “Thermische Entsorgung von Produktionsabfallen,” Entsorgungs-Praxis, 2000, vol. 6, pp. 29-33. |
| Pavlish et al., “Status Review of Mercury Control Options for Coal-Fired Power Plants,” Fuel Processing Technology, Aug. 2003, vol. 82, pp. 89-165. |
| “RBHG 4 Combats Mercury Pollution,” Know-How, Norit, vol. 6(2), 2003, 3 pages. |
| Revised Declaration of Richard Schlager, Aug. 19, 2003. |
| Richardson et al., “Chemical Addition for Mercury Control in Flue Gas Derived from Western Coals,” presented at the 2003 Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium, Washington D.C., May 2003, Paper # 63, pp. 1-16. |
| Sage et al., “Relationship of Coal-Ash Viscosity to Chemical Composition,” Journal of Engineering for Power, Apr. 1960, pp. 145-155. |
| Samaras et al., “PCDD/F Prevention by Novel Inhibitors: Addition of Inorganic S- and N-Compounds in the Fuel before Combustion,” Environmental Science and Technology, 2000, vol. 34, No. 24, pp. 5092-5096. |
| Senior et al., “Gas-Phase Transformations of Mercury in Coal-Fired Power Plants,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 63, 2000, pp. 197-213. |
| Senior, “Behavior of Mercury in Air Pollution Control Devices on Coal-Fired Utility Boilers,” Power Production in the 21st Century: Impacts of Fuel Quality and Operations, Engineering Foundation Conference, Snowbird, UT (Oct. 28-Nov. 2, 2001). |
| Singer, J., ed., “Development of Marine Boilers,” Combustion Fossil Power, Combustion Engineering, Inc., Windsor, CT, 1991, Ch. 3, pp. 10-4-10-14. |
| Sjostrom et al., “Full-Scale Evaluation of Mercury Control at Great River Energy's Stanton Generating Station Using Injected Sorbents and a Spray Dryer/Baghouse,” Air Quality III Conference, Session A3b (Feb. 10, 2002). |
| Sjostrom et al., “Full-Scale Evaluation of Mercury Control by Injecting Activated Carbon Upstream of a Spray Dryer and Fabric Filter,” Presented at the 2004 combined power plant air pollutant control mega symposium, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2004, 18 pages. |
| Sjostrom, “Evaluation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control,” ADA-ES, Inc. Topical Report for Basin Electric Power Cooperative's Laramie River Station, Jan. 16, 2006, 49 pages. |
| Sjostrom, “Evaluation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control,” Topical Report for Sunflower Electric's Holcomb Station, U.S. DOE Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC26-03NT41986, Topical Report No. 41986R07, Jun. 2005, 85 pages. |
| SKC, “The Essential Reference for air sampling,” 1997 Comprehensive Catalog & Air Sampling Guide (4 pages). |
| Sliger et al., “Towards the Development of a Chemical Kinetic Model for the Homogeneous Oxidation of Mercury by Chlorine Species,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 65-66, 2000, pp. 423-438. |
| Starns et al., “Full-Scale Evaluation of TOXECON II™ on a Lignite-Fired Boiler” presented at US EPA/DOE/EPRI Combiner Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Symposium: The Mega Symposium, Washington, DC (Aug. 30-Sep. 2, 2004). |
| Steele “Dense-Phase Pneumatic Conveying Systems,” Powder/Bulk solids, Jan. 2007, 5 pages. |
| Sudhoff, “Anticipated Benefits of the TOXECON Retrofit for Mercury and Multi-Pollutant Control Technology,” National Energy Technology Laboratory, Nov. 19, 2003, available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/cctc/pubs/Benefits—TOXECON—111903.pdf, pp. 1-20. |
| Teller et al., “Mercury Removal from Incineration Flue Gas,” Air and Water Technologies Co., for presentation at the 84th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Vancouver, British Columbia, Jun. 16-21, 1991. |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Study of Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions from Electric Tility Steam Generating Units,” Report to Congress, vol. 1-2, EPA-453/R-98-004a&b, Feb. 1998, pp. 1-165. |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-452/R-97-010, “Mercury Study Report to Congress' vol. VIII—An Evaluation of Mercury Control Technologies and Costs,” Dec. 1997. |
| Urabe et al., “Experimental Studies on Hg Vapour Removal Using Corona Discharge for Refuse Incinerator,” Chemical Abstracts, Oct. 1997, vol. 109, 37 pages (includes translation). |
| Urano, S., “Studies on Bleaching Powder, VII. The Decomposition of Calcium Hypochlorite by Heat in the Presence of Calcium Chloride,” Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry of Japan, vol. 31, 1928, pp. 46-52 (no translation). |
| Verhulst et al., “Thermodynamic behaviour of metal chlorides and sulfates under the conditions of incineration furnaces,” Environmental Science & Technology, 1996, vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 50-56. |
| Vidic et al., “Uptake of Elemental Mercury Vapors by Activated Carbons;,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1996, vol. 46, pp. 241-250. |
| Vidic et al., “Vapor-phase elemental mercury adsorption by activated carbon impregnated with chloride and cheltinq agents,” Carbon, 2001, vol. 39, pp. 3-14. |
| Vosteen et al., “Bromine Enhanced Mercury Abatement from Combustion Flue Gases—Recent Industrial Applications and Laboratory Research,” VGB PowerTech, International Journal for Electricity and Heat Generation, 2006, vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 70-75. |
| Vosteen, et al, “Mercury-Related Chemistry in Waste Incineration and Power Generation Flue Gases,” Sep. 2003, Air Quality IV, pp. 1-8. |
| Wanke et al., “The influence of flame retarded plastic foams upon the formation of Br containing dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in a MSWI,” Organohalogen Compounds, 1996, vol. 28, pp. 530-535. |
| “Speciality Impregnated Carbons,” Waterlink/Barnebey Sutcliff, copyright 2000, 5 pages. |
| Weber et al., “The Role of Copper(II) Chloride in the Formation of Organic Chlorine in Fly Ash,” Chemosphere, 2001, vol. 42, pp. 479-582. |
| White et al., “Field Test of Carbon Injection for Mercury Control at Camden County Municipal Waste Combustor,” EPA-600/R-93-181 (NTIS PB94-101540), Sep. 1993, pp. 1-11. |
| Working project report for period Oct. 1, 1999 to Sep. 30, 2001 from Institut fur Verhrenstechnik and Dampfkesselwessen (IVD), Universitat Stuttgart, dated Mar. 28, 2002, pp. 14-38. |
| Zygarlicke et al., “Flue gas interactions of mercury, chlorine, and ash during coal combustion,” Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization and Fuel Systems, Clearwater, Florida, Mar. 9-13, 1998, pp. 517-526 (ISBN 0-03206602302). |
| International Search Report for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US11/27968, mailed May 5, 2011. |
| Written Opinion for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US11/27968, mailed May 5, 2011. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/027968, mailed Sep. 20, 2012 8 pages. |
| Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/045,076, mailed Jun. 4, 2012 10 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/045,076, mailed Oct. 12, 2012 7 pages. |
| Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/645,138, mailed Apr. 19, 2013, 7 pages. |
| Final Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/645,138, mailed Aug. 7, 2013 7 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/645,138, mailed Mar. 11, 2014 pages. |
| Background of the invention for the above captioned application (previously provided), 2014. |
| Extended Search Report for European Patent Application No. 11754107.8, dated Jul. 29, 2014 13 pages. |
| Niessen, Combustion and Incineration Processes, 2002, Marcel Dekker, 3rd Edition, p. 25. |
| Speight, ed., The Chemistry and Technology of Coal, CRC Press, 1994, pp. 152-155. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140260966 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61415480 | Nov 2010 | US | |
| 61312453 | Mar 2010 | US | |
| 61542972 | Oct 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13645138 | Oct 2012 | US |
| Child | 14294506 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13045076 | Mar 2011 | US |
| Child | 13645138 | US |
