This application is a 371 U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/SE2012/051450, filed Dec. 20, 2012, and published in English as WO 2013/095283 Al on Jun. 27, 2013, which claims priority to German Patent Application No. 102011011464.9, filed Dec. 24, 2011. The entire disclosures of the above applications are incorporated by reference herein.
The invention is concerned with an airbag comprising two chambers being connected by a gas flow channel and a valve being located in said gas flow channel.
Especially from so-called curtain airbags it is known to provide two chambers serving for the protection of the passengers, wherein the two chambers are connected via a hose type gas flow channel. For example, the first chamber serves for protecting a passenger in the front and the second chamber serves for protecting a passenger in the rear of the vehicle.
In some applications it can be desired to provide a one way valve in the gas flow channel such that gas can stream unthrottled through the gas flow channel if the pressure inside the first chamber is higher than the pressure in the second chamber, but the gas stream through the gas flow channel is blocked or at least throttled if the pressure in the second chamber is larger than in the first chamber.
Such a valve is described in the generic U.S. Pat. No. 6,402,190 B1. Here, a two-layered inlay is provided inside the gas flow channel. A circumferential seam is provided at one end of the inlay which connects the two layers of the inlay to the two side walls of the gas flow channel. So, gas can stream unthrottled from the first end of the valve to its second end. In this case the two-layered inlay is inflated towards the side walls of the gas flow channel. In the opposite case the two-layered inlay collapses and blocks the gas flow.
A similar concept is shown in the DE 10 2009 005 834 A1.
Starting from this the invention sets itself the problem to improve the valve of a generic airbag. Especially the manufacture of the airbag should be very easy and the valve should be constructed in a way that allows the possibility of a defined throttling of the gas flow in the gas flow direction opposite to the unthrottled gas flow direction.
This problem is solved by an airbag according to claim 1.
As in the generic U.S. Pat. No. 6,402,190 B1 the valve is comprised of a two-layered inlay extending from a first end pointing towards the first chamber to a second end pointing towards the second chamber. But in contrast to the prior art, there is no circumferential seam such that a connection free area exists in which at least one layer of the two-layered inlay is not connected to the gas flow channel. Further, the two layers of the two-layered inlay are at least partially connected to each other in the area of the first end. Consequently, the gas flows between at least one layer of the two layered inlay and a side wall of the gas flow channel when flowing from the first to the second chamber, instead between the two layers of the two-layered inlay as is the case in the prior art.
As one will see from the description of the preferred embodiments, the assembly of the airbag is very easy and the additional work necessary in relation to an airbag without a valve is very minor. Additionally, one will see that it is very easy to “tune” the valve such that in the blocking/throttling direction a defined throttled gas flow can pass through the valve.
The invention will now be explained in detail by means of preferred embodiments in view of the accompanying figures. The figures show:
As can be seen from
The
One can see that the two layers 21, 22 of the two-layered inlay of the valve are not connected to the side walls of the gas flow channel 16 between the closing lines 17a, 17b, which also constitute the connecting lines between the two-layered inlay and the gas flow channel 16. So, there exists a connection free area, in which both layers 21, 22 of the two-layered inlay are not connected to the side walls of the gas flow channel 16.
If the pressure inside the first chamber 12 is higher than in the second chamber 14, gas flows through the gas flow channel 16 and passes the valve 20 unthrottled, namely between the first layer 21 of the two-layered inlay and the first side wall 16a of the gas flow channel and between the second layer 22 of the two-layered inlay and the second side wall 16b of the gas flow channel 16. By doing so, the two layers of the two-layered inlay are pressed together. Of course, there is a slight throttling due to a slightly higher flow resistance, but in the definitions chosen here, this state is referred to as being unthrottled.
In the other case, this is if the gas pressure inside the second chamber 14 is higher than in the first chamber 12 (this can for example occur, if a vehicle passenger in the rear of the vehicle hits the second chamber 14, but the first chamber 12 is not hit by a passenger) the valve being formed of the two-layered inlay blocks the gas flow as is shown in
The
The
The advantage of the presence of the positioning seams 40a, 40b is that in the passing state (
The
Although not shown in the figures, it is possible to combine the embodiment shown in
The invention has been described by ways of a curtain airbag which is the preferred application, but it should be pointed out that the invention might also be applied to other types of airbags, especially to seat mounted or car body/door mounted side airbags.
10 curtain airbag
12 first chamber
14 second chamber
16 gas flow channel
16
a first side wall
16
b second side wall
17
a first closing line
17
b second closing line
18 accommodation area for gas generator
20 valve
21 first layer
22 second layer
23 fold
25
a,b hole
30 first cutting
32 second cutting
34 third cutting
36 edge seam
40
a,b positioning seam
42 stiffening seam
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 122 464 | Dec 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2012/051450 | 12/20/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/095283 | 6/27/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3822720 | Souza | Jul 1974 | A |
6213499 | Khoudari | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6402190 | Heudorfer | Jun 2002 | B1 |
7637530 | Yamaji et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7819424 | Toda | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8696021 | Yamamoto | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8757657 | Hotta | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8770620 | Hotta | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8915519 | Hotta | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9120457 | Kino | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20060175809 | Yamaji et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20090322062 | Bauer et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100244418 | Honda | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110272927 | Feller et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110298200 | Taniguchi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20140210192 | Hotta | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19930155 | Jan 2001 | DE |
102009005834 | Jun 2009 | DE |
1595751 | Nov 2005 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA, ISA/EP, Stockholm, mailed Mar. 22, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150298644 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |