This application is a Nonprovisional Patent Application of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/737,653, entitled “Airborne Component Extractor”, filed Dec. 14, 2012; and Provisional Application No. 61/611,885, entitled “Fume Extractor”, filed Mar. 16, 2012, which are herein incorporated by reference.
The present disclosure relates generally to systems for extracting airborne components from air streams, such as in welding, cutting, metal working, wood working, and other applications.
A wide range of industrial, commercial, hobby and other applications result in airborne components that can be removed with proper extraction and filtering. Metal working operations, for example, range from cutting, welding, soldering, assembly, and other processes that may generate smoke and fumes. In smaller shops it may be convenient simply to open ambient air passages or to use suction or discharge air from fans to maintain air spaces relatively clear. In other applications, cart-type fume extractions are used. In industrial settings, more complex fixed systems may be employed for extracting fumes from specific works cells, metal working locations, and so forth. In other settings, such as machine shops, woodworking shops, worksites where cutting, sanding and other operations are performed, dust, fumes, particulate and other types of airborne components may be generated that it may be desirable to collect and extract from work areas and controlled spaces.
A number of systems have been developed for fume extraction, and a certain number of these are currently in use. In general, these use suction air to draw fumes and smoke from the immediate vicinity of the metal working operation, and to filter the fumes and smoke before returning the air to the room or blowing the air to an outside space. Further improvements are needed, however, in fume extraction systems. For example, it would be useful to increase the effective ability of the systems to draw the fumes and smoke from the metal working workspace. Moreover, it would be useful to increase the distance and expand the volume over which the fume extractor can effectively remove fumes and smoke.
The present disclosure provides improvements to extractors designed to respond to such needs. The techniques are based upon the use of a positive airflow in conjunction with a suction airflow that draws airborne components out of the workspace for filtration. The innovations set forth in the disclosure have a number of different facets, and may be used in conjunction with one another to obtain particular synergies and advantages, or separately in some cases.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present disclosure will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
Turning now to the drawings, and referring first to
It should be noted that while in certain embodiments described in the present disclosure a stand-alone base unit 16, and in one presently contemplated embodiment a cart-type unit is described, the present techniques is not limited to any particular physical configuration. More generally, innovations provided by and described in the present disclosure may be implemented into fixed or semi-fixed installations, such as those used in industrial, commercial, hobby, and other settings. That is, certain of the components of the base unit described herein may serve multiple workspaces, work cells, weld cells, work locations and areas, and so forth, by common conduits that direct positive-pressure air to and channel air and airborne components from multiple workspaces. Operator controls, where provided as described below, may be positioned remotely from these workspaces, or within the workspaces for control of flow to and from the particular workspace.
It should be noted that the “airborne components” discussed in the present disclosure may include any substance that is borne by, suspended in or otherwise carried by the air, or more generally the fluid present in the area considered. Depending upon the application, the airborne components may be in an aerosol form, such as solid, liquid or gaseous phase particles that are suspended in air. Such airborne components may form smoke, fumes (including chemical fumes), of clouds present or given off by an operation ongoing in the area, whether or not visible to the human operators. In other applications, the airborne components may be at least temporarily airborne but not suspended in the air, such as in the case of larger particulate, such as droplets, mist (e.g., from oils, coolants, and so forth), dust (e.g., from drywall, grain, minerals, cements, or other dust sources), chips, debris, and so forth. The present techniques are directed to collecting and extracting any such airborne components in the manners described. Similarly, reference is made in this disclosure to “air” or “airborne”, although the fluid in which the airborne components are found and that is circulated by the system may be, more generally, a gaseous substance that need not contain the same constituents, or in the same ratios as found in atmospheric air. Such gasses are intended nevertheless be included in the term “air” or “airborne”. Moreover, it is presently contemplated that the same principles of fluid dynamics and borne component removal may be applied to other “fluids” than air or gasses (including liquids), and to that extent the teachings of the present disclosure are intended to extend to those applications.
Returning to
In the illustrated embodiments conduits 18 extending between the base unit 16 and the hood 20 comprise a positive pressure air conduit 32 and a return air conduit 34. In general, the positive pressure air conduit 32 provides air to the hood, while the return air conduit 34 is under a negative or slight suction pressure to draw air containing the airborne components from the workspace. The air returning from the hood in conduit 34 may be directed through a suction filter 38 before being re-introduced into the blower 22. As described below, the system may also include components designed to allow for adjustment of the individual or relative flow rates of one or both of the positive and negative pressure air streams.
In the embodiment illustrated in
As noted above, the present techniques may allow for adjustment of the positive pressure air flow and/or the return air flow to optimize operation of the system. Several different techniques are presently contemplated for such adjustment. For example, in the embodiment illustrated in
It should also be noted that a system may be adapted to exchange data with other system components, such as a welding/plasma cutting or other system 62. In the illustrated embodiment, the system 62 may comprise, for example, welding or plasma cutting power supplies, wire feeders, shielding gas supplies, and so forth. In other metal working settings, the system may include various other manual and machine tools. In still other settings, the system may include various robots, production lines, power tools (e.g., saws, workstations, etc.). These will typically be coupled to the operation to accomplish the desired task on a workpiece 64. Certain of these systems may be capable of providing control signals to the extraction system to allow for turning the extraction system on and off, regulating speeds and air flows, and so forth. Such communications may be provided via suitable cabling 66 or by other means by wireless communications. An exemplary system designed to control operation of a fume extractor is described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/356,160, filed on Jan. 23, 2012, by Mehn et al., and entitled “Fume Extractor for Welding Applications”, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Here again, it should be noted as well that although separate adjustment mechanisms are described in connection with certain embodiments, a single adjustment could be provided that allows for simply adjusting the ratio of the flow rates, such as via a single knob or input at a base unit, at the hood, or at any convenient location.
Moreover, other and additional components and functionalities may be built into the system. For example, it is presently contemplated that at least one of the components described above, or additional components may provide for temperature regulation of the positive pressure air stream. For example, due to the significant assist offered by the positive pressure region for airborne component removal, the operator may desire to discontinue use of other fans, blowers and so forth in the work area. The positive pressure airstream may be cooled by one or more components of the base unit (or centralized system) to provide not only the desired region surrounding the work area for component removal, but also cooling for the operator. Heating in a similar manner may also be provided.
As mentioned above, the present techniques may be employed in systems and arrangements other than carts or systems and base units that are local to a work location.
Still further,
It should be noted that the hood provided in all of these implementations may include a single flange for directing the positive pressure air radially outwardly, thereby significantly facilitating manufacture of the hoods and reducing their weight. In certain presently contemplated embodiments, for example, the outer and inner components of the hood are molded or otherwise formed separately, and then assembled by simply inserting the inner component into the outer and securing it in place, with the single flange spaced from the lower periphery of the outer component.
It should also be noted that the adjustability of the volumetric or mass flow rates of positive and negative pressure air streams provides a significant improvement over other fume and smoke or more generally, airborne component extractors. It has been found that the ability to strike a balance between the flow of positive pressure air into the region surrounding the work area and the flow of negative pressure air drawn from the work area results in an extremely flexible system that can be adapted to the needs of the user, while providing enhanced component removal at greater distances from the work than previous systems.
There are several ways in which the best ratio or balance between positive and negative pressure air flows may be qualified, with this ratio being adjustable by adjustment of the air flow parameters. For example, the ratio provided by:
has been found to provide a good indication of the effectiveness of fume evacuation. The positive pressure airstream velocity may be measured, for example, at the region between the lower periphery of the outer shroud and the peripheral flange of the inner shroud. The negative pressure airstream velocity may be measured, for example, at the inlet (lower opening) of the inner shroud. Such locations offer a convenient and standard place to compare air movement parameters. In presently contemplated embodiments, the ratio R is advantageously between about 0.25 and 100, and it is believed that the ratio is particularly advantageously between about 0.6 and 10.
It should also be noted that particularly good performance has been found to result from particular ratios of mass or volumetric flow rates of the positive and negative pressure airstreams. For example, in currently contemplated embodiments, these airstreams may have mass or volumetric flow ratios (positive-to-negative airstream ratios) of between approximately 1:1 and 0.5:1, with a ratio of approximately 0.8:1 being used in a present configuration. As disclosed above, these flow rates may be obtained by system design (e.g., the sized of the conduits), but also by intaking additional air to the blower from the environment, or expelling air from the blower, each of which may, where desired, be adjustable.
Performance may be improved as compared to conventional evacuation systems, and optimized in the current techniques by appropriate selection and sizing of the system components, particularly of the conduits used to convey the airstreams to and from the work area. For example, in a currently contemplated design based on co-axial conduits, described below, an inner conduit has a nominal diameter of 7 inches, or a cross-sectional area of approximately 38 in2, while the outer conduit has a nominal diameter of 10 inches, or a cross-sectional area of approximately 79 in2, such that the annular area for the outgoing airstream has a cross-sectional area of approximately 41 in2. It is believed that a ratio of the outgoing flow area to the return flow area of between approximately 4:1 and 0.7:1 may be particularly optimal for obtaining the best airborne component removal. In a present configuration, the ratio is between approximately 1:1 and 1.5:1. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the flow areas selected may contribute significantly to the total static head required of the blower or blowers, and this may be one of the design factors leading to the ratios specified.
Further, it has been found that for a single-flange hood of the type discussed, certain dimensional relationships may provide for optimal component removal.
As discussed above, various configurations of conduits, numbers of conduits and so forth may be envisaged.
It should be noted that, while reference has been made to a single nozzle having inner and outer shrouds, certain adaptations may be made to the system without deviating from the techniques discussed in the present disclosure. For example,
In the embodiment of
Within the cart, return flow enters a filter box 154 where it is filtered to remove fine and larger particulate matter and other components borne by the airstream. The assembly may be designed for pressure cleaning, in a process that may direct pressurized air against one or more filter elements to promote the release of the captured particulate. From the filter box 154, air is drawn into the blower 22 which is driven by a motor 24 as described above. The blower discharges to a turn or elbow 156 that directs outgoing flow to the manifold and support assembly 152. It should be noted that in some embodiments, one or more motors and/or blowers may be employed. For example, one motor and blower set may be used for the outgoing or positive air stream, while another motor and blower set may be used for the return or negative air stream.
It is believed that greatly enhanced performance is obtained by the design of the cart in which as few as possible turns are provided in the incoming and outgoing flows. That is, as best illustrated in
As described herein, a “bend” within the base unit corresponds to a change in direction of between 25° and 180°, and in a particular embodiment a change in direction of approximately 90°. With this definition in mind, the only bend that occurs within the base unit is essentially at turn or elbow 156. That is, within the filter box 154, although the air is redirected to the blower inlet, air within the filter box may be considered essentially static. Air within the manifold and support assembly 152 is carefully directed by a volute structure as described below. In this sense, the base unit may be considered below. In this sense, the base unit may be considered to have a single bend. Depending upon the design of the components, the unit may be considered to have two or three bends (or more) within the filter box 154, within the turn 156, which again in the presently contemplated embodiment is a smooth elbow that efficiently directs air, and within the manifold or support assembly 152. The redirection performed by blower is considered differently insomuch as the blower is the source of the static and dynamic head imparted on the airstream. Again, it is believed that by minimizing the bends or necessary redirection of the flow within the cart, greatly enhanced performances obtained with minimal head loss. The cart may best be designed with a small and highly efficient drive motor on the blower. By way of example, current designs provide airflow with a total head across the blower on the order of 14 in H2O. Depending upon the condition of the air filter, the total static head of the system may vary between 10 in H2O and 18 in H2O. With such reductions in power requirements, current designs with an airstream volumetric flow of 900 CFM may utilize a motor having a power rating of 5 Hp. However, a presently contemplated range of between 3 and 7.5 Hp motors may provide excellent operation, particularly in an industrial context. Other power ratings and sized may, of course, be used. As noted above, in some embodiments, more than one motor and/or blower, fan or compressor may be used. Similarly the motor or motors may be fixed or variable speed.
In currently contemplated embodiments, the system may be designed such that the electrical requirements of the motor or motors, and other components may be supplied by a 460 V, 3 phase power source. In other embodiments, the system may be designed to receive 230 V, 1 phase power. In still other embodiments, the system may designed for 115 V, 1 phase power. It is also contemplated, that, in addition to “professional” and “commercial” implementations, the techniques may be employed for hobbyist and other applications. Indeed, it is contemplated that original equipment or even retrofits may be made to equipment such as shop vacuum systems, existing evacuation installations, and so forth. It is also contemplated that structures and teachings based on those set forth in the present disclosure may be utilized in specific settings to provide airborne component collection to enhanced effect. For example, smaller systems may be based on a 1 Hp or smaller motors, with short positive and negative pressure conduits, such as for desk or table-top use. Such systems may be particularly useful at workbenches, for smaller applications, for commercial and hobbyists, and so forth.
Moreover, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, in general, the head provided by the system will typically be a function of such factors as the flow areas involved (and their relative sizes), the number of bends in the system (and the nature of these—smooth and controlled versus more turbulent or tight), the nature of surfaces in the system, the length of the components (e.g., the arm), and so forth. The power required, then, will typically be a function of this head, and other factors, such as the flow rates, the type of air mover (e.g., fan, blower, or compressor), and the number of these. It is contemplated that the motor, air mover, components and so forth will be selected and set (or adjustable with ranges) to maintain efficient use of the components, particularly to maintain the air mover within a proper portion of its performance curve.
This structure is shown in exploded view in
A flow illustration of the air handler 170 is provided in
It may be noted that still other adaptations and improvements may also be envisaged for the system. For example, lights, flow sensors, or other components may be provided on the hood to assist in the work performed or in the evaluation or control of the evacuation system. Where such sensors are provided, closed-loop control of motor speeds, valve or louver positions, flow rates, and so forth may be based upon sensed parameters.
It has been found that the foregoing techniques allow for greatly enhanced capture of airborne components, such as particulate matter, smoke, fumes, gases and so forth as compared to existing technologies. In particular, for a given flow rate of gas a target velocity that is useful in capturing such components may be provided in a larger area and further from the nozzle than previously possible. In particular, in a presently contemplated embodiment, a target gas velocity in a capture region was approximately 100 ft/min, for a gas flow rate of approximately 900 CFM. Tests indicated that such velocities could be realized at approximately 3 ft from the nozzle inlet. It is believed that approximately 50 ft/min was achieved at 5 ft from the nozzle inlet. These results were realized with the system described above operating with a 5 Hp motor.
While only certain features of the disclosure have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2185919 | Kurth | Jan 1940 | A |
2210458 | Keilholtz | Aug 1940 | A |
2289474 | Anderson | Jul 1942 | A |
2367104 | Demuth | Jan 1945 | A |
RE24637 | Wulle | Apr 1959 | E |
2910558 | Engelhardt | Oct 1959 | A |
3318227 | Nelson | May 1967 | A |
3364664 | Doane | Jan 1968 | A |
3430551 | Hauville | Mar 1969 | A |
3487767 | Kristiansen | Jan 1970 | A |
4016398 | Herrick | Apr 1977 | A |
4043257 | Aaberg | Aug 1977 | A |
4158462 | Coral | Jun 1979 | A |
4160407 | Duym | Jul 1979 | A |
4163650 | Watson et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4450756 | Kling | May 1984 | A |
4493970 | Rieppel | Jan 1985 | A |
4502375 | Hignite et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4552059 | Potter | Nov 1985 | A |
4607614 | Higashino | Aug 1986 | A |
4717805 | Miyagawa | Jan 1988 | A |
4905716 | Hubbard | Mar 1990 | A |
5058490 | Sodec | Oct 1991 | A |
5069197 | Wisting | Dec 1991 | A |
5223005 | Avondoglio | Jun 1993 | A |
5263897 | Kondo | Nov 1993 | A |
5281246 | Ray et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5395410 | Jang | Mar 1995 | A |
5410120 | Taylor | Apr 1995 | A |
5427569 | Plymoth | Jun 1995 | A |
5540214 | Boudreault | Jul 1996 | A |
5713346 | Kuechler | Feb 1998 | A |
5718219 | Boudreault | Feb 1998 | A |
5890484 | Yamada | Apr 1999 | A |
6037725 | Tolbert, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
6099607 | Haslebacher | Aug 2000 | A |
6332837 | Wilk et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6358137 | Threlfall | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6607573 | Chaurushia et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616720 | Smith | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6620038 | Kikuchi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632132 | Kikuchi et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6780213 | Chang et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7000634 | Lindborg | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7959696 | Martic et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8176766 | Ruiz | May 2012 | B1 |
8211194 | Takayanagi | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8312873 | Gagas et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8460417 | Reid et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8892222 | Simms | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20020039881 | Coral | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030181158 | Schell et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050170767 | Enzenroth | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050204582 | Rossi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060157048 | Heilman | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080305731 | Reid et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090088060 | Arnold | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090321403 | Brenneke | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100206799 | Leavitt | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100282728 | Cole | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120193334 | Mehn | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130122795 | Hammers | May 2013 | A1 |
20130162177 | Hofsdal | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140213164 | Leisner | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214213 | Rockenfeller | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
637737 | Jun 1993 | AU |
682512 | Sep 1993 | CH |
2146665 | Nov 1993 | CN |
2225253 | Apr 1996 | CN |
2413708 | Jan 2001 | CN |
1384909 | Dec 2002 | CN |
200984583 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101327109 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101332392 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101526239 | Sep 2009 | CN |
201609707 | Oct 2010 | CN |
202087569 | Dec 2011 | CN |
102483240 | May 2012 | CN |
102699002 | Oct 2012 | CN |
1604293 | Sep 1970 | DE |
3412204 | Oct 1985 | DE |
4413600 | Nov 1995 | DE |
10020736 | Oct 2001 | DE |
20221100 | Jan 2005 | DE |
102005016721 | Oct 2006 | DE |
102005033224 | Jul 2007 | DE |
102006055001 | May 2008 | DE |
102009030220 | Dec 2010 | DE |
0511576 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0536871 | Apr 1993 | EP |
1227283 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1967796 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2368646 | Sep 2011 | EP |
2422865 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2613551 | Oct 1988 | FR |
2911520 | Jul 2008 | FR |
546878 | Aug 1942 | GB |
1069868 | May 1967 | GB |
2030825 | May 1980 | GB |
2032825 | May 1980 | GB |
S54147647 | Nov 1979 | JP |
H01179841 | Jul 1989 | JP |
H04063183 | Feb 1992 | JP |
H06292970 | Oct 1994 | JP |
H10288371 | Oct 1998 | JP |
0048752 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0184054 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2004088812 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005022046 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005045323 | May 2005 | WO |
2005106337 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2008032571 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report & Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/022599 mailed May 2, 2012. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2012/064081 dated Feb. 14, 2013, 12 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2013/031237 dated Jul. 23, 2013, 11 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2013/031261 dated Jul. 25, 2013, 13 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2013/030694 dated Aug. 20, 2013, 15 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2013/031246 dated Aug. 9, 2013, 13 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2013/031251 dated Aug. 6, 2013, 15 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2013/030697 dated Jul. 30, 2013, 13 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2014/036956, dated Aug. 29, 2014, 14 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2014/044119, dated Sep. 10, 2014, 10 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2014/011860, dated Apr. 24, 2015, 10 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130244556 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61737653 | Dec 2012 | US | |
61611885 | Mar 2012 | US |