Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The present invention relates generally to a system and method for engine-bay cooling in a turbojet aircraft engine along with cycle flow matching. More particular, the present invention utilizes the structure of a decoupled third stream inlet duct on a decoupled third stream annulus (“DTSA”) aircraft gas turbine engine to modulate intake airflow between the inlet decoupled inlet duct and an engine bay cooling stream.
Supersonic aircraft endure extreme high temperatures caused by propulsion systems and in-flight engine cooling is required. Many aircraft engine cooling systems employ the use of external apertures to intake cooling airflow from one or more parts of the aircraft. Such external apertures are not desirable for achieving a low observable (“LO”) signature for the aircraft. Furthermore, the use of additional apertures increase complexity, cost and weight of the aircraft requiring additional mechanical systems such as additional flow paths and mechanism to draw the cooling external airflow to an engine bay.
Furthermore, variable geometries for inlets systems for cycle matching are common in supersonic aircraft. The objective of the variable geometries are to vary the airflow intake to match the airflow the engine requirements at varying speeds, engine loads and altitudes. Such variable geometries add weight, cost and complexity to the intake system. In many fixed geometry intake systems, in order to reduce weight and complexity, such systems may operate in a preferred range of cruising altitude and Mach number. In off-design operating conditions, however, the aircraft suffers from performance penalties caused by spillage drag of supplying too little or too much airflow to the aircraft engine.
As such, there is a great need in the art for an aircraft engine airflow management system that can provide engine bay cooling while maximizing the LO of the aircraft. In addition there is a great need in the art for an engine intake airflow management system that provides a simplified cycle matching that reduces the weight and complexity of existing systems.
The present invention relates to a system and method of LO airflow modulation that utilizes existing engine inlet geometry to provide engine bay cooling airflow without the need for superfluous external apertures and the mechanical systems that accompany such airflow cooling intakes. In addition to the engine bay cooling, the system and method provides a means for varying the airflow into the engine inlet to increase the mass flow ratio and reducing the drag effects of off-design range of flight by properly matching the engine airflow with the inducted inlet flow.
The present invention provides an airflow modulation system for use in aircraft DTSA engines. The DTSA engine is positioned within an aircraft fuselage, and with said engine positioned within an aircraft engine bay. The DTSA engine is a gas turbine variety formed with a generally cylindrical housing with a turbine fan positioned within the housing. A second DTSA turbine fan is provided with the blades exposed outside of the cylindrical housing. The second DTSA turbine fan has it own dedicated decoupled air inlet duct, or fan duct that is formed co-centrically about the housing. The decoupled air inlet duct is formed on the interior by the wall of the center turbine cylinder, and on the exterior by a duct wall. The duct wall terminates downstream from the inlet, and an airflow modulator member is positioned in the duct to form the duct wall when the modulator is in a closed position. The Modulator member is pivotally connected to the duct wall, and is movable by an actuator to a second open position that allows airflow to escape the third stream duct, or fan duct, and provide airflow to both the DTSA fan blades as well as engine bay or cooling duct. The airflow to the engine bay or cooling duct provides for cooling of the engine or otherwise modulates the amount of airflow to the DTSA turbine. The actuator is controlled by on-board electronics that monitor, among other things, temperature, speed, engine load and altitude. An on board processor, based upon one or more of these factors, provides instructions to the modulator actuators to provide an efficient amount of airflow to the DTSA turbine and/or the engine bay for efficient operation and cooling.
The method of the present invention provides airflow modulation to an aircraft employing a DTSA engine, said method including the receiving of airflow from a supersonic aircraft intake; sensing a number of parameters, including, but not limited to aircraft speed, temperature, engine load and/or altitude. Calculating an efficient amount of airflow to provide to the DTSA turbine blades thorough a decoupled airstream; and directing movement of a modulator vane located in the intake duct to vary airflow to the DTSA turbine. The method can provide engine cooling as well as cycle matching of the airflow to maximize efficiency of operation.
These and other features and advantages of the various embodiments disclosed herein will be better understood with respect to the following description and drawings, in which like numbers refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
Referring to
Referring particularly to
The vane 30 is moved from an open position to a close position by externally mounted actuators 31. The engine requires different amounts of airflow, and the different degrees of cooling depending on different stages of flight operation. The vane 30 of the present invention improves efficiency over an entire flight regime as opposed to most conventional propulsion systems which are optimized for cruise flight conditions. The vane 30 allows varying amounts of airflow to the DTSA turbine blades as well as varying amounts of cooling airflow to the engine bay 38. The vane 30 may be controlled through actuators 31 interconnected to a computer based system which would regulate the opening and closing of the vane 30 based upon a number of parameters, including but not limited to, the engine power setting, air speed or mach number and/or altitude. Actuators 31 will include an array of actuators 31 that interface an array of circumferentially positioned vanes 30 (as shown in
Referring particularly to
Referring particularly to
Referring particularly to
The above description is given by way of example, and not limitation. Given the above disclosure, one skilled in the art could devise variations that are within the scope and spirit of the invention disclosed herein. Further, the various features of the embodiments disclosed herein can be used alone, or in varying combinations with each other and are not intended to be limited to the specific combination described herein. Thus, the scope of the claims is not to be limited by the illustrated embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2846844 | O'Rourke | Jan 1956 | A |
2958188 | Leitner et al. | Aug 1957 | A |
3199810 | Stroud et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3418808 | Rich | Dec 1968 | A |
3483881 | Pike et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
3495605 | Gunnarson et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3797233 | Webb et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3841091 | Sargisson | Oct 1974 | A |
3974648 | Kepler | Aug 1976 | A |
3979903 | Hull et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4010608 | Simmons | Mar 1977 | A |
4163366 | Kent | Aug 1979 | A |
4175384 | Wagenknecht et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4295332 | Steyer et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4351150 | Schulze | Sep 1982 | A |
4934632 | Kim | Jun 1990 | A |
5214914 | Billig et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5251435 | Pauley | Oct 1993 | A |
5351476 | Laborie et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5357742 | Miller | Oct 1994 | A |
5402638 | Johnson | Apr 1995 | A |
5404713 | Johnson | Apr 1995 | A |
5406787 | Terrier | Apr 1995 | A |
5417056 | Johnson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5655359 | Campbell et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5809772 | Giffin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5867980 | Bartos | Feb 1999 | A |
6206631 | Schilling | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6705569 | Sanders et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6901739 | Christopherson | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6942181 | Dionne | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7048229 | Sanders et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7188467 | Johnson | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7216474 | Bulman et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7216475 | Johnson | May 2007 | B2 |
7246484 | Giffin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7364117 | Dionne | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7395657 | Johnson | Jul 2008 | B2 |
8082727 | Roberge | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8127528 | Roberge | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8161728 | Kupratis | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8205432 | Sheridan | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20070119150 | Wood et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070264133 | Schwarz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080141676 | Johnson | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090000265 | Kupratis | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090000270 | Kupratis | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090000271 | Kupratis | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090090096 | Sheridan | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100162682 | Lerg | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180572 | Wadia et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100313591 | Lents et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110150627 | Baughman | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167784 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110171007 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110262265 | Avenell | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120272658 | Murphy | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130177392 | Rupp et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110138814 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |