The present invention relates generally to aircraft enclosures, and more particularly relates to an aircraft cabin enclosure, such as a lavatory, an aircraft closet, or an aircraft galley, for example, including an aircraft cabin structure having an aft portion with a substantially vertically extending exterior aft surface that is substantially not flat in a vertical plane.
Aircraft lavatories, closets and other full height enclosures commonly have forward walls that are flat in a vertical plane. Structures such as passenger seats installed forward of such aircraft lavatories, closets and similar full height enclosures often have shapes that are contoured in the vertical plane. The juxtaposition of these flat walled enclosures and contoured structures renders significant volumes unusable to both the function of the flat walled lavatory or enclosure and the function of the contoured seat or other structure. Additionally, due to the lack of a provision for structural load sharing, conventional aircraft lavatories require a gap between the lavatory enclosures and adjacent structures, resulting in a further inefficiency in the use of space.
Aircraft bulkheads, typically separating passenger cabin areas or classes of passenger service, are in common use, and typically have a contour permitting passengers seated behind the bulkhead to extend their feet modestly under the premium seats immediately forward of the bulkhead. These provide a comfort advantage to passengers seated behind the bulkhead, but provide no increased efficiency in the use of space, in that they do not enable the seats fore and aft of the bulkhead to be placed more closely together. Short, floor-mounted stowage boxes, typically no taller than the bottom cushion of a passenger seat, are often positioned between the flat wall of current lavatories or other enclosures and passenger seats. These provide no improvement to the utility or spatial efficiency of the lavatory or other enclosure. While they do provide some useful stowage for miscellaneous items, they do not provide sufficient additional stowage to provide more space for passenger seating.
It would be desirable to provide an aircraft lavatory or other enclosure that can reduce or eliminate the gaps and volumes of space previously required between lavatory enclosures and adjacent structures to allow an adjacent structure such as passenger seating installed forward of the lavatory or other enclosure to be installed further aft, providing more space forward of the lavatory or enclosure for passenger seating or other features than has been possible in the prior art. Alternatively, the present invention can provide a more spacious lavatory or other enclosure with no need to move adjacent seats or other structures forward.
It would also be desirable to provide an aircraft lavatory or other enclosure with a wall to bear loads from an adjacent passenger seating or other structure, permitting elimination of a required gap between the lavatory or other enclosure and the adjacent passenger seating or other structure, making more space available for other uses. In addition, enabling a lavatory or other enclosure to bear loads from an adjacent structure can reduce the combined weight of the lavatory or other enclosure and the adjacent structure.
It also would be desirable to provide an aircraft lavatory or other enclosure that can reduce or eliminate the gaps and volumes of space previously required between lavatory enclosures and adjacent structures, to allow the installation of an increased number of passenger seats, to increase the value of the aircraft. The present invention meets these and other needs.
Briefly, and in general terms, the present invention provides for an enclosure, such as a lavatory, an aircraft closet, or an aircraft galley, for example, for a cabin of an aircraft including a structure having an aft portion with a substantially vertically extending exterior aft surface that is substantially not flat in a vertical plane. The enclosure structure permits a combination of the enclosure with the structure in a manner that permits significant saving of space in the aircraft, which in turn permits more seats to be installed, or more space to be offered per seat, increasing the value of the aircraft.
Accordingly, in one presently preferred aspect, the present invention provides for an enclosure unit for a cabin of an aircraft including an aircraft cabin structure having an aft portion with an exterior aft surface that is substantially not flat in a vertical plane. The enclosure unit can be a lavatory, an aircraft closet, or an aircraft galley, for example. In one presently preferred aspect, the enclosure unit includes one or more walls that are taller than an adjacent aircraft cabin structure, the one or more walls defining an interior enclosure space and having a forward wall portion. The forward wall portion is configured to be disposed immediately aft of and adjacent to or abutting the exterior aft surface of the aircraft cabin structure, and the forward wall portion is shaped to substantially conform to the shape of the exterior aft surface of the aircraft cabin structure.
In another presently preferred aspect, the enclosure unit includes an enclosure stall unit, and the aircraft cabin structure is a passenger seat installed immediately forward of the enclosure stall unit. In another presently preferred aspect, the forward wall portion of the enclosure unit is configured to accept loads from the aircraft passenger seat. In another presently preferred aspect, the forward wall portion includes a forward projection configured to project over an aft portion of the adjacent passenger seat immediately forward of the enclosure stall unit.
In another presently preferred aspect, the enclosure is a lavatory, including a lavatory stall unit with one or more walls having a forward wall portion. The one or more walls define an interior lavatory space, and the forward wall portion is configured to be disposed immediately aft of and adjacent to or abutting an aircraft cabin structure having an exterior aft surface having a shape that is substantially not flat in a vertical plane. In a presently preferred aspect, the forward wall portion is shaped to substantially conform to the shape of the exterior aft surface of the aircraft cabin structure.
In another presently preferred aspect, the aircraft cabin structure is a passenger seat installed immediately forward of the lavatory stall unit, and the forward wall portion of the lavatory stall unit is configured to accept loads from the passenger seat. In another presently preferred aspect, the forward wall portion includes a forward projection configured to project over an aft portion of the adjacent passenger seat immediately forward of the lavatory stall unit. In another presently preferred aspect, the forward wall portion defines a secondary space in the interior lavatory space in an area forward of an aft-most portion of the forward wall portion. The secondary space can provide an amenity stowage space inside the lavatory stall unit in the area forward of an aft-most portion of the forward wall portion, and can include design elements providing visual space inside the lavatory in the area forward of an aft-most portion of the forward wall portion.
In another presently preferred aspect, the present invention provides for an assembly of an aircraft enclosure unit and an aircraft cabin structure for an aircraft cabin, the assembly in combination including an aircraft cabin structure having an exterior aft surface having a shape that is substantially not flat in a vertical plane, and an aircraft enclosure unit including at least one wall having a forward wall portion. The one or more walls define an interior enclosure space, the forward wall portion is disposed immediately aft of and adjacent to the aircraft cabin structure, and the forward wall portion is shaped to substantially conform to the shape of the exterior aft surface of the aircraft cabin structure. In another presently preferred aspect, the aircraft cabin structure is a passenger seat installed immediately forward of the aircraft enclosure unit. In another presently preferred aspect, the forward wall portion is configured to accept loads from the aircraft passenger seat. In another presently preferred aspect, the forward wall portion includes a forward projection configured to project over an aft portion of the adjacent passenger seat immediately forward of the aircraft enclosure unit.
In another presently preferred aspect, the aircraft enclosure unit is a lavatory stall, and the one or more walls define an interior lavatory space. In another presently preferred aspect, the forward wall portion defines a secondary space in the interior lavatory space in an area forward of an aft-most portion of the forward wall portion.
In another presently preferred aspect, the present invention provides for an assembly of an aircraft lavatory unit and an aircraft cabin structure for an aircraft cabin, in which the assembly in combination includes an aircraft cabin structure having an exterior aft surface having a shape that is substantially not flat in a vertical plane, and an aircraft lavatory stall unit including one or more walls having a forward wall portion. In another presently preferred aspect, the one or more walls define an interior lavatory space, the forward wall portion is disposed immediately aft of and adjacent to the aircraft cabin structure, and the forward wall portion is shaped to substantially conform to the shape of the exterior aft surface of the aircraft cabin structure. In another presently preferred aspect, the aircraft cabin structure is a passenger seat installed immediately forward of the aircraft lavatory stall unit, and wherein the forward wall portion of the aircraft lavatory stall unit is configured to accept loads from the passenger seat. In another presently preferred aspect, the forward wall portion includes a forward projection configured to project over an aft portion of the adjacent passenger seat immediately forward of the aircraft lavatory stall unit. In another presently preferred aspect, the forward wall portion defines a secondary space in the interior lavatory space in an area forward of an aft-most portion of the forward wall portion.
These and other aspects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings, which illustrate by way of example the features of the invention.
Referring to the drawings, which are provided by way of example, and not by way of limitation, the present invention provides for an enclosure 10, such as a lavatory for a cabin 12 of an aircraft (not shown), although the enclosure may also be an aircraft closet, or an aircraft galley, or similar enclosed or structurally defined spaces, for example. As is illustrated in
In another presently preferred aspect, the forward wall portion defines a secondary space 36 in the interior lavatory space in an area 38 forward of an aft-most portion 40 of the forward wall portion, and the forward wall portion includes a forward projection 42 configured to project over the aft portion of the adjacent passenger seat back 44 immediately forward of the lavatory stall unit. The secondary space can include an amenity stowage space 46 inside the lavatory stall unit in the area forward of the aft-most portion of the forward wall portion, and the secondary space can include design elements providing visual space, such as a visual perception of space, inside the lavatory in the area forward of an aft-most portion of the forward wall portion.
It will be apparent from the foregoing that while particular forms of the invention have been illustrated and described, various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited, except as by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 15/141,494 filed Apr. 28, 2016, which is a continuation of and claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Ser. No. 14/709,378, filed May 11, 2015, issued on Jun. 14, 2016 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,365,292, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/043,500, filed on Oct. 1, 2013, issued on Jul. 7, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,073,641, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 13/089,063, filed on Apr. 18, 2011, issued on Nov. 26, 2013 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,590,838, which claims priority from Provisional Application No. 61/326,198, filed Apr. 20, 2010, and Provisional Application No. 61/346,835, filed May 20, 2010, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2650368 | Evans | Sep 1953 | A |
2760443 | Gobrecht | Aug 1956 | A |
2914001 | Murphy | Nov 1959 | A |
3738497 | Betts et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
4055317 | Greiss | Oct 1977 | A |
4884767 | Shibata | Dec 1989 | A |
5150863 | Hozumi et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5333416 | Harris et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340059 | Kanigowski | Aug 1994 | A |
5482230 | Bird et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5529265 | Sakurai | Jun 1996 | A |
5577358 | Franke | Nov 1996 | A |
5611503 | Brauer | Mar 1997 | A |
5716026 | Pascasio et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6000659 | Brauer | Dec 1999 | A |
6079669 | Hanay et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6237872 | Bar-Levav | May 2001 | B1 |
6520451 | Moore | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6615421 | Itakura | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6742840 | Bentley | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6822812 | Brauer | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6874731 | Brauer et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6889936 | Pho et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
D508173 | Guard et al. | Aug 2005 | S |
D516496 | Guard et al. | Mar 2006 | S |
D533129 | Guard et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
7156345 | Brauer et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7222820 | Wentland et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7252267 | Young et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7284287 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7331545 | Young et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7448574 | Young et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7448575 | Cheung et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7469860 | Young et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7516919 | Young et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
D606923 | Young et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
D617254 | Guard et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
7871039 | Fullerton et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7934679 | Bock et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8087613 | Fullerton et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8096502 | Bock et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8109469 | Breuer et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8162258 | Joannis et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8167244 | Johnson et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8177163 | Wilcynski et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8590838 | Cook et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
D705909 | Koyama et al. | May 2014 | S |
20030193220 | Jensen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20060192050 | Cheung et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070164157 | Park | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070170310 | Bock et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070241232 | Thompson | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070295863 | Thompson | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090050738 | Breuer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090050783 | Roberts | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090065642 | Cheung et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090146004 | Plant | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090200422 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090255437 | Hachet et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100059625 | Saint-Jalmes et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100181425 | Guering et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110121134 | Schotte et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110139930 | Sutthoff et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110210205 | Bock et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110253835 | Cook et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120025018 | France et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120112505 | Breuer et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120253752 | Brauer | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120273614 | Ehlers et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120325964 | Hawkins et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130206906 | Burrows et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140014774 | Pozzi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027572 | Ehlers et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027574 | Obadia et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150363656 | Brauer | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1867485 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101218149 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101351384 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101588966 | Nov 2009 | CN |
101765541 | Jun 2010 | CN |
694 22 723 | Jun 2000 | DE |
697 25 542 | Apr 2004 | DE |
102007009863 | Sep 2008 | DE |
0 722 404 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0 850 834 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1281614 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1 685 023 | Aug 2006 | EP |
H05246355 | Sep 1993 | JP |
2007523002 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2009513419 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2003026495 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2005014395 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005080196 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2007006938 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007013164 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2009073244 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2014024046 | Feb 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Petition for Post Grant Review of U.S. Design Patent No. D764,031 filed Apr. 10, 2017 and assigned PGR No. PGR2017-00019. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,365,292 filed Apr. 13, 2017 and assigned IPR No. IPR2017-01274. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,073,641 filed Apr. 13, 2017 and assigned IPR No. IPR2017-01275. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,440,742 filed Apr. 13, 2017 and assigned IPR No. IPR2017-01276. |
Final Written Decision in IPR2014-00727 under 35 U.S.C. § 318; 37 C.F.R. § 42.73. |
Declaration of Alan Anderson Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.68. |
Rendering of the KLM Crew Rest. |
Declaration of Paul Sobotta executed Apr. 2, 2015 and submitted in IPR2014-00727. |
Image of B/E Aerospace “Spacewall,” available at <http://beaerospace.com/products/structures-and-integration/737-advanced-lavatory/>. |
Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Motion for Preliminary Injunction in B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. Zodiac Aerospace, et al., No. 2:14-cv-210, Dkt. 47 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 6, 2014). |
Voluntary Dismissal in B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. Zodiac Aerospace, et al., No. 2:14-cv-210, Dkt. 50 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 19, 2014). |
Patent Owner's Opening Brief in Federal Circuit Appeal Nos. 16-1496, 16-1497. |
Declaration of Scott Savian, dated Mar. 20, 2017, including Exhibits A-E thereto. |
Declaration of Vince Huard, dated Mar. 10, 2017, including Exhibits A-I thereto. |
McDonnell Douglas DC-10 Customer Configuration Summary (a/k/a Orange Book), revised Oct. 1978 (the “Orange Book”). |
Declaration of Ronald Kemnitzer executed Apr. 10, 2017 and submitted in PGR2017-00019. |
B/E Aerospace Press Release regarding Investor Day Webcast dated Mar. 12, 2012. |
Letters from Petitioner, C&D Zodiac, Inc. to Patent Owner, B/E Aerospace, Inc. regarding Prior Art. |
B/E Aerospace Investor Day Presentation dated Mar. 12, 2012. |
“New aircraft lay sees B/E Aerospace flushed with success,” Apex Editor's Blog Article dated Apr. 19, 2013. |
SEC Exhibit 99.1—B/E Aerospace News Release—“B/E Aerospace Wins Exclusive Boeing Award; Program Estimated Value in Excess of $800 Million.” |
B/E Aerospace's Complaint for Patent Infringement in B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. Zodiac Aerospace, Inc. et al., No. 2:14-cv-01417 (E.D. Tex., Dec. 15, 2016). |
Declaration of R. Klaus Brauer, submitted during prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,378. |
Declaration of Mitchell Freeman, submitted during prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,378. |
Screen capture from website of Tony Bravetti, available at <http://www.tonybravetti.com/my-work-edited>. |
B/E Aerospace News Release—“Boeing Delivers First of 100 Next-Generation 737s to Delta Air Lines Configured with Numerous B/E Aerospace Systems and Products.” |
Slide Deck, B/E Aerospace, Spacewall Technology, Examiner Interview, Feb. 24, 2016, 53 pages. |
International Search Report, dated Sep. 15, 2011, 8 pages. |
McDonnel Douglas, DC-10 Customer Configuration, Oct. 1978, 177 pages. |
C&D Zodiac, Inc.'s proposal to Scandinavian Airlines System to manufacture S4 Storage Unit, Aug. 23, 2001, 17 pages. |
C&D Zodiac, Inc.'s drawings with a leading page entitled “MD90,” 27 pages. |
Photographs of C&D Zodiac, Inc.'s S4 storage unit, 5 pages. |
C&D Zodiac, Inc.'s Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,590,838 (including Exhibits tabs 1-9), May 2, 2014, 856 pages. |
Technical Proposal by FSI to Air France regarding a Door 4 overhead crew rest station for the Boeing 747, Aug. 3, 1994, 10 pages. |
Rendering and photographs of Boeing 747 overhead crew station, 3 pages. |
B/E Aerospace, Inc.'s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, May 16, 2014, 25 pages. |
Greg Chamitoff Declaration in support of B/E Aerospace, Inc.'s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, May 14, 2014, 39 pages. |
International Search Report, dated Jan. 27, 2015, 5 pages, from PCT/US2013/050342 published as WO 2014/014780 on Jan. 23, 2014. |
Final Written Decision, Case IPR2014-00727, Paper No. 65 (PTAB Oct. 26, 2015). |
StartupBoeing, DC-10 presentation, copyright 2007. |
Letter from Flight Structures, Inc. to Air France, Aug. 3, 1994, re “B747-400M Door 4 Crew Rest”, and enclosures. |
Flight Structures, Inc., 747 Door 4 Overhead Crew Rest rendering. |
Chinese Search Report, dated Aug. 5, 2014, 1 pages, from Chinese application No. 2011800202050. |
Final Written Decision in IPR 2017-01276 under 35 U.S.C. 318; 37 U.S.C. 42 dated Sep. 28, 2018. 51 pages. |
Office Action on Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-523145 dated Jun. 5, 2017. 6 pages. |
R. Klaus Brauer, Affidavit Submitted in Related Case U.S. Appl. No. 14/709,378, signed Mar. 31, 2016, pp. 1-19. |
Office Action on Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-523145 dated Nov. 29, 2017. 4 pages. |
Office Action on Canadian Patent Application No. 2879022 dated Jul. 12, 2017. 3 pages. |
Office Action on Canadian Patent Application No. 2879022 dated Apr. 16, 2018. 3 pages. |
Office Action on European Patent Application No. 13819463 dated Dec. 12, 2017. 4 pages. |
Office Action on Canadian Patent Application No. 2796589 dated Jan. 11, 2017. 4 pages. |
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review in case IPR2017-01274 dated Oct. 31, 2017. 14 pages. |
Request for reconsideration of decision denying institution of inter partes review in case IPR2017-01274 dated Nov. 29, 2017. 15 pages. |
Decision pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42.71(d) in case IPR2017-01274 dated Mar. 9, 2018. 7 pages. |
C&D Zodiac, Inc's Notice of Appeal in case IPR2017-01274 dated Mar. 19, 2018. 28 pages. |
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review in case IPR2017-01273 dated Oct. 31, 2017. 11 pages. |
Request for Reconsideration of Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review in case IPR2017-01273 dated Nov. 29, 2017. 15 pages. |
Decision pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42.71(d) in case IPR2017-01273 dated Mar. 8, 2018. 6 pages. |
C&D Zodiac, Inc's Notice of Appeal in case IPR2017-01273 dated Mar. 19, 2018. 24 pages. |
Decision Instituting Inter Partes Review in case IPR2017-01275 dated Oct. 31, 2017. 24 pages. |
B/E Aerospace, Inc.'s Response in case IPR2017-01275 dated Jan. 31, 2018. 52 pages. |
C&D Zodiac, Inc's Reply in case IPR2017-01275 dated May 1, 2018. 35 pages. |
Judgment Inter Partes Review in cases IPR2017-01275 and IPR2017-01276 dated Jul. 5, 2018. 4 pages. |
B/E Aerospace, Inc.'s Response in case PGR2017-00019 dated Jan. 31, 2018. 48 pages. |
C&D Zodiac, Inc.'s Reply in case PGR2017-00019 dated May 1, 2018. 32 pages. |
Decision in Institution of Post-Grant Review in case PGR2017-00019 dated Oct. 31, 2017. 27 pages. |
Decision in Institution of Inter Partes Review in case IPR2017-01276 dated Oct. 31, 2017. 28 pages. |
B/E Aerospace, Inc.'s Response in case IPR2017-01276 dated Jan. 31, 2018. 61 pages. |
C&D Zodiac, Inc.'s Reply in case IPR2017-01276 dated May 1, 2018. 35 pages. |
Final Written Decision in case IPR2017-01276 dated Sep. 28, 2018. 51 pages. |
Request for rehearing following final written decision in case IPR2017-01276 dated Oct. 12, 2018. 18 pages. |
Order on petition for rehearing En Banc in case IPR2014-00727 dated Dec. 7, 2017. 2 pages. |
Petition for rehearing En Banc in case IPR2014-00727 dated Nov. 11, 2017. 46 pages. |
Office Action on Australian Patent Application No. 2011242901 dated Aug. 25, 2015. 3 pages. |
Office Action on Australian Patent Application No. 2016219635 dated Aug. 31, 2016. 3 pages. |
Search on Chinese Patent Application No. 201180020205.0 dated Jul. 28, 2014. 1 page. |
First Office Action on Chinese Patent Application No. 201180020205.0 dated Aug. 5, 2014. 17 pages. |
Search on Chinese Patent Application No. 201380037324.6 dated Nov. 3, 2015. 2 pages. |
First Office Action on Chinese Patent Application No. 201380037324.6 dated Nov. 16, 2015. 15 pages. |
Second Office Action on Chinese Patent Application No. 201380037324.6 dated Jul. 13, 2016. 16 pages. |
Office Action on Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-506240 dated Oct. 1, 2013. 4 pages. |
Office Action on Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-506240 dated Jun. 24, 2014. 4 pages. |
Office Action on Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-506240 dated Feb. 24, 2015. 4 pages. |
Office Action on Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-523145 dated Mar. 1, 2016. 6 pages. |
Office Action on Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-523145 dated Oct. 18, 2016. 6 pages. |
Examination Report on Australian Application No. 2017221822 dated Nov. 12, 2018. 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170233077 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61346835 | May 2010 | US | |
61326198 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15141494 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 15258529 | US | |
Parent | 14709378 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 15141494 | US | |
Parent | 14043500 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 14709378 | US | |
Parent | 13089063 | Apr 2011 | US |
Child | 14043500 | US |