Environmental concerns and noise certification regulations have driven the significant reduction in jet engine noise in airplanes. As result, airframe noise has emerged has a leading component of aircraft noise during the final approach phase of a landing. One of the main contributors to this airframe noise in a landing configuration is the landing gear. In particular, on larger airplanes the landing gear is becoming the dominant source of noise. Landing gear systems have complex, non-streamlined geometries and generate highly turbulent wakes. Vortices shed from one component of the landing gear tend to impinge on other elements, thus generating noise. Furthermore, it is common practice to mount non-load bearing (non-structural) elements of the landing gear, such as hydraulic pipes, electric cables and locking springs, on the external surface of the load bearing structural elements, such as the telescopic struts and side stays. As a consequence the airflow over the landing gear is further disrupted. This is also exacerbated by the non-streamlined cross-section of some of the load bearing elements of the landing gear, such as the side-stays.
Initial efforts to reduce the noise generated by the landing gear when deployed have been focused on encompassing the existing landing gear structures in various streamlined fairings. Examples of this approach are disclosed in United States Patent Application US2009/0176078 and International Patent Application WO2004/089742. However, this approach adds weight and complexity, and hence cost, because the aerodynamic fairings are merely introduced in addition to the existing landing gear structures.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided an aircraft landing gear including at least one load bearing longitudinal structural element wherein said longitudinal element is hollow and is arranged to have at least one non-structural element located inside.
The longitudinal structural element preferably has an external surface arranged to streamline the airflow around it when in use. The external cross-section, and hence the overall shape, of the longitudinal element may vary along its length.
The longitudinal structural element may include at least one area of local reinforcement. This may comprise an area of increased wall thickness of the hollow longitudinal element.
In at least one embodiment of the present invention the longitudinal structural element comprises a side stay, whilst the non-structural element may, either in addition or in other embodiments, comprise one or more springs.
Some embodiments of the present invention are described below, by way of non-limiting illustrative examples only, with reference to the accompanying figures, of which:
Referring to
A cross-section through the lower stay 16 and pair of springs 18 is shown in
As illustrated in
An advantage of locating the non-structural elements of the landing gear within the hollow load bearing element is that the non-structural elements are removed from the air stream and therefore do not contribute to the turbulence and noise generated by the landing gear as a whole. In addition, by streamlining the external surface of the load bearing structural element a further reduction in turbulence and noise generated by the load bearing element itself is achieved. As illustrated in
Conventional materials, such as metal alloys or fibre reinforced plastic composites, may be used for the manufacture of the landing gear elements according to embodiments of the present invention. The internal and external geometry of the load bearing element can be varied to provide the desired strength and weight characteristics of the load bearing element. For example, a local reinforcement in particular areas may be provided, as illustrated in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0918337.7 | Oct 2009 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2010/050715 | 4/30/2010 | WO | 00 | 6/8/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/048393 | 4/28/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1819414 | Gruss | Aug 1931 | A |
1955142 | Minshall et al. | Apr 1934 | A |
2326210 | Falk et al. | Aug 1943 | A |
2692739 | Martin et al. | Oct 1954 | A |
2866633 | Schnitzer | Dec 1958 | A |
3473369 | Garrison | Oct 1969 | A |
3822048 | Hartel | Jul 1974 | A |
3826450 | Currey et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
4405119 | Masclet et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
20070108344 | Wood | May 2007 | A1 |
20090176078 | Seror et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100017052 | Luce | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101279645 | Oct 2008 | CN |
2085445 | Jul 1997 | RU |
WO-2004089742 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report in PCT/GB2010/050715 mailed Dec. 1, 2010. |
Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/GB2010/050715 mailed Dec. 1, 2010. |
First Office Action in Russian Application No. 2012120293/11(030542) dated Mar. 18, 2014. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201080047976.4 dated Jan. 28, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120241558 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |