The present disclosure relates generally to sensor systems, and more particularly, to a system and a method of transmission control.
Portable electronic devices are prolific and increasingly used outside the proximity of humans. One application includes Active RFID and similar technologies (such as cell phone based triangulation or Wi-Fi/Wi-MAX) often track shipments throughout the freight transportation system or supply chain. Wireless communication circuitry may include RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) tags when the entity using the tags wants to track the geographical position of the tags through the additional use of GPS (global positioning system) or other location determining circuitry.
If such tags are attached to items being shipped by air, the wireless communication circuitry portion of these tags must be deactivated or otherwise modified while in the presence of operational aircraft. If such deactivation requires human intervention, there is a likelihood that such deactivation (or reactivation) may be overlooked. Thus it would be desirable to have circuitry that can detect a situation such as the presence of operational aircraft and automatically deactivate at least the wireless communication circuitry signal transmission capability while the tag remains in the immediate vicinity of operational aircraft.
Automated deactivation/activation may utilize proprietary technology that incorporates sensor input from a number of sources that are used in algorithms to predict when the device is on an aircraft. The sensors may detect the aircraft radio transponder, an accelerometer, a barometric pressure sensor, or an ultrasonic frequency sensor to detect the noise from the jet engine, and possibly others. These sensed parameters are then used to disable a radio frequency (RF) transmitter to comply with airline requirements. These methods may be relatively effective but are centered on measuring pressure altitude or motion that necessarily relies on aircraft movement.
An aircraft proximity sensor system according to one disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can includes a control module in communication with a transceiver module and an aircraft proximity sensor module, the control module operable to disable transmission by the transceiver module in response to the aircraft proximity sensor module.
A further embodiment of the present disclosure may include, wherein the aircraft proximity sensor system is incorporated within a radio frequency transmission device.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the radio frequency transmission device includes a data logger.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the transceiver module is operable to transmit a cellular signal.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the aircraft proximity sensor module includes an aircraft/tower radio communication sensor.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor is operable to detect transmission between 118.000-136.975 MHz.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor is operable to detect transmission at 120.000 MHz.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor is operable to detect transmission on an Air Traffic Control Frequency.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor is operable to detect transmission on a Company Airlines Operational Control Frequency.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor is operable to detect transmission on at least one of a Unicom, multicom, Flight Services, and Traffic Advisory (CTAF) frequency for an uncontrolled airport.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the control module is operable to disable transmission by the transceiver module in response to the aircraft proximity sensor module being proximate a stationary aircraft.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the aircraft proximity sensor module includes a tri-axis electromagnet field sensor.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the tri-axis electromagnet field sensor is operable to detect electromagnetic fields generated by an aircraft.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the tri-axis electromagnet field sensor is operable to detect electromagnetic fields at 400 Hz.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the control module is operable to disable transmission by the transceiver module in response to the aircraft proximity sensor module being proximate an aircraft with inactive jet engines.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein the aircraft proximity sensor module includes an aircraft/tower radio communication sensor and a tri-axis electromagnet field sensor.
A method of transmission control for a data logger, the method according to another disclosed non-limiting embodiment of the present disclosure can include detecting a proximity to an aircraft; and disabling transmission from a data logger in response to the proximity.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein detecting the proximity includes detecting the proximity to a stationary aircraft.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein detecting the proximity includes detecting the proximity while the jet engines of the aircraft are inactive.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein detecting the proximity includes detecting aircraft/tower radio communication.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein detecting the proximity includes detecting radio transmission between 118.000-136.975 MHz.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein detecting the proximity includes detecting aircraft power system operation.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein detecting the proximity includes detecting electromagnetic fields generated by an aircraft.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein detecting the proximity includes detecting electromagnetic fields at 400 Hz.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein detecting the proximity includes detecting aircraft power system operation and detecting aircraft/tower radio communication.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, wherein detecting the proximity includes detecting aircraft power system operation and detecting aircraft/tower radio communication.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, cycling the detection thereof in a periodic manner to confirm the absence of aircraft/tower radio communication.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, cycling the detection continuously to confirm the absence of aircraft/tower radio communication.
A further embodiment of any of the embodiments of the present disclosure may include, enabling transmission from the data logger in response to the proximity subsequent to the disabling.
The foregoing features and elements may be combined in various combinations without exclusivity, unless expressly indicated otherwise. These features and elements as well as the operation thereof will become more apparent in light of the following description and the accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however, the following description and drawings are intended to be exemplary in nature and non-limiting.
Various features will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the disclosed non-limiting embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
In one embodiment, the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 includes a control module 20 with a processor 22, a memory 24, and an interface 26. The processor 22 can include any type of microprocessor having desired performance characteristic. The memory 24 can include any type of computer readable medium that stores the data and control processes disclosed herein. That is, the memory 24 is an example computer storage media that can have embodied thereon computer-useable instructions such as a process that, when executed, can perform a desired method. The interface 26 of the control module 20 can facilitate communication between the control module 20 and other systems and or modules such as the transceiver module 14 and an aircraft proximity sensor module 30.
In one example aircraft proximity sensor module 30, an aircraft/tower radio communication sensor 32 is operable to detect radio communications between an aircraft 40 and a control tower 42 when the aircraft is within the immediate vicinity of an airport 44 or other environment where such communication is typically utilized (
It should be appreciated that a tower controller is typically responsible for aircraft in the immediate area around the airport (typically up to 3000 feet and 5 miles from the airport). Once the aircraft leaves the airspace of the airport, the aircraft is handed off to a controller at a Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) or an Air Route Traffic Control Centers (ARTCC Center), commonly referred to as Air Traffic Control which operates on different frequencies (
In this embodiment, the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor 32 need be but a relatively uncomplex radio operable at, for example, 120 MHz. Since this sensing scheme is passive, there is no local oscillator such that no interference can be generated. Further, since this sensing scheme requires a relatively strong signal and operates only over a very limited distance, application thereof is advantageous in this application. The aircraft/tower radio communication sensor 32 is thereby readily operable to passively detect when the aircraft is proximate the airport 44. It should be appreciated that terms such as proximity, are indicative of a relative position to an aircraft or a geographical location whereby RF transmissions from the radio frequency transmission device 12 may be prohibited such as airport 44 (
In another example aircraft proximity sensor module 30, a tri-axis electromagnet field sensor 34 is operable to detect electromagnetic fields generated by an aircraft. For example, aircraft typically utilize power supplies of 115 volts (V) AC at 400 Hertz (Hz) to generate, regulate and distribute electrical power throughout the aircraft 40 due to the benefits of relatively smaller and lighter transformers (
It should be appreciated that the tri-axis electromagnet field sensor 34 may be utilized independently or in combination with the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor 32 to determine whether the transceiver module 14 requires a change of state in response to a situation such as whether the aircraft is operating in an environment where the transmission of such RF signals could potentially interfere with electronics onboard the aircraft such as takeoff or landing.
Still other sensors 36A, 36B, 36n such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, GPS, etc., or combinations thereof, with an integrated control algorithm, may be utilized in combination with the aircraft proximity sensor module 30, to further delineate whether the transceiver module 14 requires a change of state. For example, the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 is passively operable to detect that the aircraft is proximate an environment in which the radio frequency transmission device 12 is to be disabled before any motion is initiated, such as before the airplane pushes back from a gate and/or before the engines are started.
With reference to
Initially, the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 may be associated with cargo or other airborne equipment transported or contained within the aircraft (step 102).
Next, should the aircraft proximity sensor module 30 identify that the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 is proximate an aircraft (step 104), the control module 20 responds by disabling transmissions from the radio frequency transmission device 12 (step 106). In one embodiment, the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 includes the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor 32 to detect communications either from the aircraft associated with the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 or other communications proximate thereto such as that associated with other aircraft at the airport that indicates the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 is proximate aircraft.
In this example, the control module 20 may again enable transmissions from the radio frequency transmission device 12 once the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 is no longer regulatory restricted, e.g., greater than 3000 feet and 5 miles from the airport (step 108) as, for example, communications detectable by the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor 32 are no longer utilized. That is, aircraft/tower radio communication is not utilized in flight.
In another example, the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 includes the tri-axis electromagnet field sensor 34 to identify that the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 is proximate an operational aircraft (step 104). That is, the tri-axis electromagnet field sensor 34 may be utilized alone or in combination with the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor 32. In this example, the tri-axis electromagnet field sensor 34 is operable to identify that the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 is proximate an operational aircraft irrespective of the aircraft operational conditions. That is, if the aircraft power supplies are operating, the tri-axis electromagnet field sensor 34 may be utilized to disable transmissions from the radio frequency transmission device 12.
In still another example, the tri-axis electromagnet field sensor 34 may be utilized in combination with the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor 32 to identify that the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 is aboard an aircraft, but that aircraft is outside a range detectable by the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor 32 (step 108). That is, the aircraft is in flight but not proximate an airport, e.g., not landing, taking off, taxing, etc. The control module 20 may thereby accordingly enable or disable the radio frequency transmission device 12 as programmed.
The method 100 for operation of the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 may cycle, e.g., continuously or periodically, to identify that the aircraft proximity sensor system 10 is aboard an aircraft, but that aircraft is outside a range detectable by the aircraft/tower radio communication sensor 32 (step 108) such that, for example, the control module 20 may more specifically enable or disable the radio frequency transmission device 12 as programmed. In other words, the more specific proximity determination increases the utilization of the radio frequency transmission device 12 and thus the data therefrom.
Alternatively, or in addition, one or more other sensors 36A, 36B, 36n (
These sensing schemes can thereby advantageously detect their presence near or on an aircraft even before any motion starts, allowing the cellular or other transmitter to be disabled even prior to movement and/or engine operation of the aircraft.
The elements described and depicted herein, including in flow charts and block diagrams throughout the figures, imply logical boundaries between the elements. However, according to software or hardware engineering practices, the depicted elements and the functions thereof may be implemented on machines through computer executable media having a processor capable of executing program instructions stored thereon as a monolithic software structure, as standalone software modules, or as modules that employ external routines, code, services, and so forth, or any combination of these, and all such implementations may be within the scope of the present disclosure.
The use of the terms “a,” “an,” “the,” and similar references in the context of description (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or specifically contradicted by context. The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context (e.g., it includes the degree of error associated with measurement of the particular quantity). All ranges disclosed herein are inclusive of the endpoints, and the endpoints are independently combinable with each other.
Although the different non-limiting embodiments have specific illustrated components, the embodiments of this invention are not limited to those particular combinations. It is possible to use some of the components or features from any of the non-limiting embodiments in combination with features or components from any of the other non-limiting embodiments.
It should be appreciated that like reference numerals identify corresponding or similar elements throughout the several drawings. It should also be appreciated that although a particular component arrangement is disclosed in the illustrated embodiment, other arrangements will benefit herefrom.
Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present disclosure.
The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Various non-limiting embodiments are disclosed herein, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that various modifications and variations in light of the above teachings will fall within the scope of the appended claims. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the disclosure may be practiced other than as specifically described. For that reason the appended claims should be studied to determine true scope and content.
This application claims the benefit of provisional application Ser. No. 62/181,324, filed Jun. 18, 2015.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3564493 | Hicklin | Feb 1971 | A |
5485634 | Weiser et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5615132 | Horton et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5815407 | Huffman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6011973 | Valentine et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6085096 | Nakamura | Jul 2000 | A |
6246891 | Isberg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6265975 | Zimmerman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6343213 | Steer et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6421622 | Horton et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438385 | Heinonen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448906 | Nachtsheim et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6490455 | Park et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496703 | da Silva | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6643517 | Steer | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6687497 | Parvulescu et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721572 | Smith et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6782266 | Baer et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6799052 | Agness et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6832093 | Ranta | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6885288 | Pincus | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6917291 | Allen | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922059 | Zank et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6990338 | Miller et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993329 | Cho et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7003330 | Moles | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7142877 | Lipovski | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7176808 | Broad et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7181229 | Singh et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194278 | Cook | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7233247 | Crossno et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7248054 | Kalokitis et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7355505 | Bonner et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7460863 | Steelberg et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7460866 | Salkini et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7475806 | Crossno et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7493565 | Parupudi et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7538681 | Sharma et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7554299 | Broad | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7574220 | Purkayastha et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7647070 | Shah | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7652576 | Crossno et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7742745 | Twitchell, Jr. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7791455 | MacLean, III et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7796038 | Batra | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7798400 | Skaaksrud et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7933235 | Lott et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7986269 | Kling et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8000692 | Abel et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8061607 | Crossno et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8078124 | Kling et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8126445 | Kennedy | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8169299 | Sharma | May 2012 | B2 |
8214370 | Turon et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8239169 | Gregory et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8295858 | Fox et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8299920 | Hamm et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301082 | Twitchell, Jr. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8315617 | Tadayon et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8353006 | Lynch et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8374623 | Vellanki et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8473238 | Miller et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8502672 | Crossno | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8521428 | Liccardo et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8576064 | Mitchell | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8626193 | Crossno et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8655378 | Crossno et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8731538 | Cook et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8824360 | Muller et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8825436 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8832792 | Mikan | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20020017989 | Forster et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020039896 | Brown | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020145536 | Clise | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030132853 | Ebert | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040098060 | Ternes | May 2004 | A1 |
20040192188 | Dieudonne | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050170850 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060152357 | Hyde | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060160562 | Davis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176175 | Evans et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060258376 | Ewell, Jr. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070285238 | Batra | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004040 | Bogart | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015801 | Sharma | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045200 | Skinner et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090117919 | Hershenson | May 2009 | A1 |
20090315704 | Rosing et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325566 | Bell et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100231164 | Yang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100255858 | Juhasz | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100267375 | Lemmon et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100279626 | Bradley et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110078089 | Hamm et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110256884 | Kazmi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110283235 | Kling et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110314490 | Keen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120161958 | Turon et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120212323 | Skaaksrud et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120214506 | Skaaksrud et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216252 | Skaaksrud et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232847 | Horton et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130214909 | Meijers et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130295904 | Putman | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130346336 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140125452 | Josefiak | May 2014 | A1 |
20140330737 | Williams et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0641137 | Mar 1995 | EP |
2329794 | Mar 1999 | GB |
9857518 | Dec 1998 | WO |
9918745 | Apr 1999 | WO |
0060556 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0131960 | May 2001 | WO |
2004064003 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2010003151 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2012009738 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012171943 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013044399 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013131072 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 6,768,414, 07/2004, Heinrich et al. (withdrawn) |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160374001 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62181324 | Jun 2015 | US |