None.
None.
The technology herein relates to electronic controllers used for windshield or window heating systems e.g., in aircraft.
Window anti-icing, deicing, and defogging systems are used to keep windshield areas free of ice, frost, and fog. These can be electric, pneumatic, or chemical depending on the type and complexity of the aircraft.
High performance and transport category aircraft windshields are typically made of laminated glass, polycarbonate, or similar ply material 110, 114, 118 of
Whether resistance wires or a laminated conductive film is used, aircraft window heat systems often have transformers to supply power and feedback mechanisms, such as thermistors, to provide a window heat control unit with information used to keep operating temperature within acceptable limits. Some systems are automatic while others are controlled by cockpit switches. Separate circuits for pilot and co-pilot are common to ensure visibility in case of a malfunction. See Ice and Rain Protection, https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aircraft/amt_airfra me_handbook/media/ama_Chl 5.pdf
While much work has been done in the past, further improvements are possible.
The following detailed description of exemplary non-limiting illustrative embodiments is to be read in conjunction with the drawings of which:
In case of an AC system, the window heater element is often made of a thin and uniform film 112 embedded within the transparent material. See
The heater controller unit for a DC system aircraft often provides two different types of control: ON-OFF, and variable Pulse Width Modulation:
1) ON-OFF: the controller is designed to keep the heater temperature within two temperature limits, there being a significant temperature difference between the two temperature limits. However, this temperature difference is enough to cause, under some flight conditions, an optical diffraction in the windshield, due to the temperature gradient made by external temperature and heater temperature. This effect occurs until the window temperature stabilizes, but it may disturb the pilot's vision for a few seconds.
2) Pulse width modulation (PWM): the controller delivers to the heater a switched power, with the signal width (i.e., the width of a period power signal) being controlled according to the heater temperature. Using PWM, the heater temperature tends to be constant. A drawback of this solution is that often, depending on the size of the windshield and the heat output of the heater, a high power (large current) needs to be switched. Periodically switching a high power potentially generates excessive electromagnetic interference to other aircraft systems.
The example non-limiting technology herein provides an alternative way to control window heater temperature by delivering to the heater a DC voltage with variable level.
As shown in
The input voltage to the controller must be within 20-30 VDC range (see
The duty cycle of the PWM signal may vary from 0% to 100%, this percentage will be controlled by Control Law circuit 310. The output from Control Law circuit is a 0-1 V signal that controls a PWM circuit 308, which will generate a PWM signal with a duty cycle proportional to this input signal. The Control Law circuit 308 receives the temperature reading signal and calculates the error compared to a reference temperature (38° C.). The temperature reading is made by a proper analog conditioning circuit 316, giving a signal proportional to the temperature sensor resistance. However, this temperature signal is monitored by a dedicated circuit 312 in order to detect if it is still in valid range or unwanted value (overheat). Also, this circuit 312 monitors the output current and input voltage, in order to avoid operating in failure conditions.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/BR2018/000030 | 6/6/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/232598 | 12/12/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4357524 | Apfelbeck | Nov 1982 | A |
4434358 | Apfelbeck | Feb 1984 | A |
5072098 | Matthews | Dec 1991 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0991301 | May 1993 | EP |
1 318 697 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1318697 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1 432 862 | Apr 1976 | GB |
2 261 333 | May 1993 | GB |
2261333 | May 1993 | GB |
H10144455 | May 1998 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/BR2018/000030 mailed Feb. 19, 2019, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/BR2018/000030 mailed Feb. 19, 2019, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210229793 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |