This invention relates to aircraft wing assemblies, and more specifically, to aircraft wing assemblies having both composite and metal panels.
Wing assemblies of conventional modern commercial aircraft generally include a wing box made from aluminum panels, spars, and ribs. Although desirable results have been achieved using prior art wing assemblies, there may be room for improvement. For example, the reduction of structural weight of an aircraft generally equates to better airplane performance. With respect to commercial aircraft, such improved performance has value in the marketplace. Composite materials have been examined as an alternative to aluminum, however, composite materials are generally expensive in comparison with aluminum, and may not be well suited for carrying high compressive loads experienced in certain circumstances.
The present invention is directed to aircraft wings having both composite and metal panels. Embodiments of methods and systems in accordance with the present invention may advantageously provide substantial weight savings, more robust lightning/EME protection characteristics, better discreet source damage tolerance characteristics, and improved cost over competing prior art wing assemblies.
In one embodiment, a wing assembly includes a support structure having a first end portion adapted to be coupled to an aircraft, an upper panel assembly formed from a metal material and coupled to the support structure, and a lower panel assembly formed from a composite material and coupled to the support structure. The metal material may be aluminum, titanium, or any other suitable metal, and the composite material may be a carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) material or other suitable composite material. In an alternate embodiment, the upper panel assembly includes a downwardly depending first web portion positioned proximate the first end portion of the support structure, and the lower panel assembly includes an upwardly depending second web portion, the second web portion being proximate the first web portion, the wing assembly further comprising an interface member of an isolating material disposed between the first and second web portions, and at least one fastener coupling the second web portion, the interface member, and the first web portion to the support structure.
Preferred and alternate embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings.
The present invention relates to wing assemblies for aircraft having both composite and metal panels. Many specific details of certain embodiments of the invention are set forth in the following description and in
In general, embodiments of the present invention provide wing assemblies having both composite and aluminum panels. Certain composite materials, including carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) materials, perform well in tension and resist fatigue damage. Aluminum has relatively good compression properties but relatively lower tensile and fatigue performance. Thus, wing assemblies that include composite panels in areas that primarily experience tensile loads, and aluminum panels in other areas that primarily experience compression loads, may provide substantial weight reduction in comparison with prior art wing assemblies, and may provide a wing assembly that is lighter than either a fully aluminum built wing assembly or a full CFRP wing assembly.
A number of distinct complexities are encountered in the development of embodiments of wing assemblies having both CFRP panels and aluminum panels, including 1) galvanic corrosion at CFRP/aluminum interfaces, 2) different rates of thermally induced expansion and 3) incompatible strain limits of aluminum and CFRP. These areas of concern are addressed in the present disclosure, and have been at least partially mitigated by embodiments of the present invention, as described more fully below.
As shown in
A pair of interface portions 120 situated at opposing ends of the support structure 110 couple each of the upper spar chords 104 to the lower spar chords 114. More specifically, as best shown in
In one particular embodiment, to prevent galvanic corrosion of the metallic upper spar chord 104, the following features are incorporated: (1) the interface member 126 isolates the web portion 115 of the lower spar chord 114 from the web portion 105 of the upper spar chord 104, (2) the upper spar chord 104 is coated with one or more coats of a non-electrically conducting material, (3) the interface portion 120 is coated with a thin layer of sealant, and (4) the fasteners 124 are installed with a wet sealant, with insulative collars (not shown) on the side proximate the upper spar chord 104. In a further embodiment, the heads of the fasteners 124 may be cap sealed and the collars may be self-sealing. By ensuring that the composite materials are physically isolated from the metal materials, and by preventing the ingress of moisture at the interfaces, the threat of galvanic corrosion may be reduced or eliminated. Furthermore, the location of the interface portion 120 in an upper portion of the wing assembly 100 may serve to keep the joint out of any pooling moisture.
Composite materials (e.g. CFRP materials) and metal materials (e.g. aluminum) may exhibit significantly different rates of thermally-induced strain. Thus, a metallic upper panel assembly 102 attached to a composite material lower panel assembly 112 subject to thermal cycling will exhibit bending strains (tip up when cooled and tip down when heated). Swept wing aircraft will also experience wing twist as a geometric result of the thermal bending. This wing twist can be mitigated with non-swept wing configurations. The thermal loading must be accounted for in both static and fatigue evaluation of the wing box. These loads are generally additive to the mechanical loads.
Embodiments of the present invention may provide advantages over the prior art. For example, by configuring a wing box as described above, substantial weight savings may be realized. In some embodiments, it may be possible to achieve a weight savings such that embodiments of the present invention are lighter than an entirely-composite material (e.g. CFRP) wing box, and approximately 20% lighter than an all aluminum wing box. Additional benefits may include providing more robust lightning/EME protection characteristics than an entirely-composite material wing designs, and better discreet source damage tolerance than competing entirely-composite material concepts. Integration of the nacelle, side of body and main landing gear may also be simplified using embodiments of the present invention compared with an entirely-composite material design. An additional benefit is the cost advantage of the embodiments of the present invention compared to an entirely-composite material wing box design.
Embodiments of wing assemblies in accordance with the present invention may be used in a wide variety of different flight vehicles. For example,
Although the aircraft 300 shown in
While preferred and alternate embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of these preferred and alternate embodiments. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4542866 | Caldwell et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4749155 | Hammer et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4836470 | Criswell | Jun 1989 | A |
4880189 | Day | Nov 1989 | A |
5154370 | Cox et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5216799 | Charnock et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5332178 | Williams | Jul 1994 | A |
5496002 | Schutze | Mar 1996 | A |
5735486 | Piening et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5806798 | Gillandt et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5829716 | Kirkwood et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5924649 | Piening et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6190484 | Appa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6237873 | Amaoka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6375120 | Wolnek | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6475320 | Masugi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6513757 | Amaoka et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6638466 | Abbott | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6745979 | Chen | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6776371 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6849323 | Benson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20020195524 | Amaoka et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030226935 | Garratt et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040124311 | Kordel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0732262 | Sep 1996 | EP |
1070661 | Jan 2001 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080023585 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |