The invention relates generally to methods for controlling the operation of an multiple-displacement internal combustion engine, for example, used to provide motive power for a motor vehicle.
The prior art teaches equipping vehicles with “variable displacement,” “displacement on demand,” or “multiple displacement” internal combustion engines in which one or more cylinders may be selectively “deactivated,” for example, to improve vehicle fuel economy when operating under relatively low-load conditions. Typically, the cylinders are deactivated through use of deactivatable valve train components, such as the deactivating valve lifters as disclosed in U.S. patent publication no. US 2004/0244751 A1, whereby the intake and exhaust valves of each deactivated cylinder remain in their closed positions notwithstanding continued rotation of their driving cams. Combustion gases are thus trapped within each deactivated cylinder, whereupon the deactivated cylinders operate as “air springs” to reduce engine pumping losses.
When vehicle operating conditions are thereafter deemed to require an engine output torque greater than that achievable without the contribution of the deactivated cylinders, as through a heightened torque request from the vehicle operator based upon a detected intake manifold air pressure representing a current engine load, the deactivatable valve train components are returned to their nominal activated state to thereby “reactivate” the deactivated cylinders. More specifically, under one prior art approach, a torque request or torque demand signal, as determined, for example, from current accelerator pedal position and current engine speed, is compared to a mapped value for available engine torque at that engine speed. A value for a torque “reserve” representing an output torque “cushion” during a subsequent transition to a full-cylinder-activation mode with no more than a negligible torque disturbance (generally imperceptible to the vehicle operator) is also calculated or provided. When the torque request exceeds the mapped threshold value less the reserve threshold, the engine control module initiates a “slow” transition out of the cylinder-deactivation engine operating mode. These “slow” transitions, intended to feature only those transition torque disturbances that are generally imperceptible to the vehicle operator, are to be distinguished from “fast” transitions that are typically triggered in response, for example, a torque request that well exceeds the available engine torque, under which conditions a noticeable torque disturbance is perhaps even desirable as feedback to the vehicle operator.
Unfortunately, because the prior art “trigger” for such “slow” transitions back to a full-displacement engine operating mode is based upon detected manifold air pressure, it will be appreciated that the prior art approach may specify continued engine operation in a partial-displacement mode that might otherwise generate unacceptable levels of vehicle noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) determinations. Further, such prior art approaches necessarily require corrections to the detected manifold air pressure, for example, for ambient barometric pressure and temperature, thereby increasing the complexity of the calculations from which a maximum engine output torque in partial-displacement mode is derived, while further requiring such additional engine hardware as a barometric pressure sensor.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a method for estimating an output torque generated by a multi-displacement internal combustion engine operating in a partial-displacement mode, for example, for use in controlling a “slow” reactivation of a given deactivated engine cylinder, includes providing a first measure representing a mass air flow through the engine's intake manifold based, for example, on detected instantaneous values for engine speed and manifold air pressure. Alternatively, the first measure is representative of a maximum mass air flow that can be achieved during partial-displacement engine operation, for example, based on engine speed, manifold air pressure, and at least one of a detected or inferred value for the barometric pressure, an inlet air temperature, an engine coolant temperature, and an exhaust oxygen content, as represented by an output of an exhaust oxygen sensor.
The method further includes determining a mass-air-flow-to-torque conversion factor and a mass-air-flow-to-torque offset based on the engine speed data. While the invention contemplates determining the conversion factor and the offset in any suitable manner, in an exemplary computer-executable process in accordance with the invention, respective calibratable values for the conversion factor and the offset are retrieved from a pair of lookup tables based on an averaged value for engine speed. In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the first measure is determined based on a calculation of a maximum mass air flow through the intake manifold in a full-displacement engine operating mode, multiplied by a partial-displacement correction factor that preferably reflects both the absence of the deactivated cylinders and the any effects of cylinder deactivation on airflow through the intake manifold (which may, for example, be optimized for full-displacement engine operation rather than partial-displacement engine operation).
The method further includes multiplying the first measure representing an instantaneous or maximum mass air flow by the conversion factor to obtain a second measure representing an instantaneous or maximum pre-offset base indicated torque, respectively; and summing the second measure with the torque offset to obtain a third measure representing an instantaneous or maximum base indicated potential torque. The instantaneous or maximum base indicated potential torque measure is thereafter multiplied with a torque-based efficiency conversion factor to thereby obtain a third measure representing an instantaneous or maximum efficiency-corrected indicated potential torque measure. It will be appreciated that the invention contemplates using a torque-based efficiency measure that preferably represents the product of a variety of efficiency measures impacting the instantaneous and maximum engine output torque when the engine operates in the partial-displacement mode, for example, a partial-displacement spark efficiency measure (e.g., based on the delta spark from MBT), a fuel-air-ratio efficiency measure (e.g., based on an average fuel-air-ratio where LBT is considered as 1.0), and an exhaust gas recirculation efficiency measure (e.g., based on an EGR fraction).
Preferably, and in accordance with another aspect of the invention, the method includes summing the third measure with a torque-based frictional loss measure to thereby obtain the desired estimate of instantaneous or maximum engine output torque that is generated at the engine's flywheel. While the invention contemplates determining the frictional loss measure in any suitable manner, in a preferred embodiment, the frictional loss measure at least includes torque-based values representing temperature- and load-based mechanical friction losses, pumping losses, and short-term losses from the “negative work” associated with the compression of the intake charge trapped in the deactivated cylinders (which short-term losses preferably “ramp down” to a zero value after several engine cycles).
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that the invention provides an air-flow-based measure representing one or both of an instantaneous engine output torque and a maximum engine output torque during engine operation in a partial-displacement mode, each of which is advantageously utilized in making a torque-based determination whether a transition to full-displacement engine operation is desirable. Further, output torque determinations in accordance with the invention inherently corrects for the NVH effects of lower engine speed operation through use of the speed-based conversion factor and torque offset, thereby providing desired transitions to full-displacement engine operation before reaching the NVH levels tolerated by prior art manifold-pressure-based transition algorithms.
Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated upon a review of the subsequent description of the preferred embodiment and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings.
A method 10 for estimating an output torque generated by a multi-displacement internal combustion engine operating in a partial-displacement mode that is, for example, particularly well-suited for use in controlling a “slow” reactivation of a given deactivated engine cylinder, is generally illustrated in
As seen in
It will also be appreciated that the invention contemplates determining the first measure provided at block 12, representing an instantaneous or maximum mass air flow through the engine's intake manifold, in any suitable manner. In the exemplary embodiment, for example, the first measure is determined using a speed-density model, based on engine speed, manifold air pressure, and at least one of a detected or inferred values for barometric pressure, inlet air temperature, engine coolant temperature, and exhaust oxygen content (the latter being derived, for example, from an output of an exhaust oxygen sensor).
Referring again to
As seen at block 16 of
And, at block 22 of
Referring to
While the above description constitutes the preferred embodiment, it will be appreciated that the invention is susceptible to modification, variation and change without departing from the proper scope and fair meaning of the subjoined claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5111788 | Washino | May 1992 | A |
5408974 | Lipinski et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5568795 | Robichaux et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5806012 | Maki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5839409 | Denz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5970943 | Robichaux et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6311670 | Constancis | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6360713 | Kolmanovsky et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6615804 | Matthews et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6655353 | Rayl | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687602 | Ament | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6736108 | Rayl et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6752121 | Rayl et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6782865 | Rayl et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6843752 | Bolander | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7000589 | Matthews et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013866 | Prucka et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
20020157640 | Matthews et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162540 | Matthews et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040244744 | Falkowski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244751 | Falkowski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |