The present disclosure relates in general to wind turbine rotor blades, and more particularly to improved airfoil configurations for wind turbine rotor blades.
Wind power is considered one of the cleanest, most environmentally friendly energy sources presently available, and wind turbines have gained increased attention in this regard. A modern wind turbine typically includes a tower, a generator, a gearbox, a nacelle, and a rotor having a rotatable hub with one or more rotor blades. The rotor blades capture kinetic energy of wind using known airfoil principles. The rotor blades transmit the kinetic energy in the form of rotational energy so as to turn a shaft coupling the rotor blades to a gearbox, or if a gearbox is not used, directly to the generator. The generator then converts the mechanical energy to electrical energy that may be deployed to a utility grid.
Each rotor blade extends from the hub at a root of the blade and continues to a tip. A cross-section of the blade is defined as an airfoil. The shape of an airfoil may be defined in relationship to a chord line. The chord line is a measure or line connecting the leading edge of the airfoil with the trailing edge of the airfoil. The shape may be defined in the form of X and Y coordinates from the chord line. The X and Y coordinates generally are dimensionless. Likewise, the thickness of an airfoil refers to the distance between the upper surface and the lower surface of the airfoil and is expressed as a fraction of the chord length.
The inboard region, i.e., the area closest to the hub, generally requires the use of relatively thick foils (30%≤t/c≤40%). The aerodynamic performance of conventional airfoil designs, however, degrades rapidly for thicknesses greater than 30% of chord largely due to flow separation concerns. For thicknesses above 40% of chord, massive flow separation may be unavoidable such that the region of the blade may be aerodynamically compromised.
In some instances, flatback airfoils may be used in the inboard region to allow for higher lift of thick airfoils but at reduced chords. Traditional flatback designs, however, can be extremely costly and complicated to manufacture.
Roundback airfoils are substantially less expensive and less complicated to manufacture than flatback airfoils. Although roundback airfoils allow the airflow to “feel” a larger trailing edge thickness (and hence the potential for increased lift performance), such airfoils can create flow separation on the curved surface that is sensitive to small details in the inflow. As such, the separation location and hence the lift from the roundback airfoil can fluctuate to an unacceptable extent.
Thus, there is a need for a new and improved airfoil configuration for a wind turbine rotor blade that addresses the aforementioned issues. More specifically, an airfoil that provides improved aerodynamic performance particularly with respect to the inboard region would be advantageous.
Aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
In one aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a rotor blade assembly for a wind turbine. The rotor blade assembly includes a rotor blade having exterior surfaces defining a pressure side, a suction side, a leading edge, and a trailing edge each extending in a generally span-wise direction between an inboard region and an outboard region. The inboard region includes a blade root that is typically characterized by a rounded trailing edge. Further, the rotor blade assembly further includes at least one airflow separation element mounted to either or both of the pressure or suction sides of the rotor blade within the inboard region and adjacent to the rounded trailing edge. In addition, the at least one airflow separation element corresponds to a contour of the pressure side or the suction side of the rotor blade. As such, an edge of the at least one airflow separation element is configured to provide a fixed airflow separation location in the inboard region during standard operation.
In one embodiment, the rotor blade assembly includes opposing airflow separation elements, wherein one of the airflow separation elements is configured on the pressure side and the other airflow separation element is configured on the suction side. In certain embodiments, the airflow separation element(s) may include any one of or combination of the following: one or more airflow separation anchors, one or more airflow separation plates, a non-structural fairing, and/or similar.
In certain embodiments, the one or more airflow separation anchors include a proximal end and a distal end, with the proximal and distal ends being fixed to at least one of the pressure side or the suction side of the rotor blade. As such, the rounded trailing edge extends beyond the airflow separation anchor(s) in a generally chord-wise direction. Further, in particular embodiments, the airflow separation anchors may include a wedge-shaped cross-section configured to separate airflow from a corresponding surface.
In additional embodiments, the one or more airflow separation plates may include a proximal end and a distal end with the proximal end being fixed to at least one of the pressure side or the suction side of the rotor blade. In further embodiments, the distal end of the airflow separation plate is configured to align with the rounded trailing edge of the rotor blade in a generally chord-wise direction. In an alternative embodiment, the distal ends of the airflow separation plates are configured to extend beyond the rounded trailing edge of the rotor blade in a generally chord-wise direction. As such, the distal ends of the airflow separation plates create a void at the rounded trailing edge so as to mimic a flatback airfoil.
In particular embodiments, the rotor blade assembly may also include at least one structural component configured between the airflow separation plate and a corresponding surface of the rotor blade. As such, the structural component is configured to provide support to the airflow separation plate(s).
In further embodiments, the non-structural fairing may include a straight portion configured between a first end and a second end. As such, when the first end is mounted to the pressure side and the second end is mounted to the suction side of the rotor blade, the straight portion creates a flatback trailing edge of the rotor blade.
In another embodiment, the airflow separation element(s) are located from about 90% chord to about 95% chord from the leading edge of the rotor blade.
In another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a wind turbine. The wind turbine includes a plurality of rotor blades, with each blade having exterior surfaces defining a pressure side, a suction side, a leading edge and a trailing edge each extending in a generally span-wise direction between an inboard region and an outboard region. The inboard region includes a blade root that is typically characterized by a rounded trailing edge. Further, the rotor blade assembly further includes at least one airflow separation element mounted to either or both of the pressure or suction sides of the rotor blade within the inboard region and adjacent to the rounded trailing edge. In addition, the at least one airflow separation element corresponds to a contour of the pressure side or the suction side of the rotor blade. As such, an edge of the at least one airflow separation element is configured to provide a fixed airflow separation location at a predetermined airflow separation line in the inboard region during standard operation. It should be appreciated that the airflow separation elements of the wind turbine may further include any of the features as described herein.
In yet another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to an airflow separation kit for an inboard or blade root portion of a rotor blade in a wind turbine. The airflow separation kit includes a plurality of airflow separation elements. Each of the airflow separation elements includes a proximal end and a distal end. The proximal end is configured to mount to at least one of the pressure side or the suction side of the rotor blade within the inboard region thereof and adjacent to the rounded trailing edge. In addition, each of the airflow separation elements corresponds to a contour of the pressure side or the suction side of the rotor blade. As such, each of the airflow separation elements are configured to provide a fixed airflow separation location (e.g. at an edge thereof) in the inboard region during standard operation. It should be appreciated that the airflow separation kit may further include any of the features as described herein.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
Reference now will be made in detail to embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Generally, the present disclosure is directed to a rotor blade assembly for a wind turbine having an improved airfoil configuration. More specifically, the rotor blade assembly includes a rotor blade having exterior surfaces defining a pressure side, a suction side, a leading edge, and a trailing edge each extending in a generally span-wise direction between an inboard region and an outboard region. The inboard region includes the blade root and the outboard region includes the blade tip. The blade root generally includes a rounded trailing edge, i.e. a roundback airfoil, and one or more airflow separation elements attached to one or more of the blades' surfaces. As such, an edge of the at least one airflow separation element is configured to provide a fixed airflow separation location in the inboard region during standard operation. Accordingly, the combination of the roundback airfoil and the airflow separation element(s) mimic airflow of a flatback trailing edge.
The present disclosure provides many advantages not present in the prior art. For example, the combination of the roundback airfoil with the airflow separation elements significantly reduces the manufacturing difficulty and cost associated with traditional flatback airfoils. Further, the rotor blade assembly of the present disclosure reduces blade cost and weight and improves blade strength.
Referring now to the drawings,
As such, the present disclosure is directed to a roundback airfoil as generally illustrated in
Referring particularly to
One or more structural components may also be included within the rotor blade 22 to provide structural support to the rotor blade 22. For example,
As illustrated in
The airflow separation element(s) 102 may include any suitable elements configured to separate airflow from a surface of the blade 22. For example, in certain embodiments, the airflow separation element(s) 102 may include one or more airflow separation anchors 104, one or more airflow separation plates 106, or a non-structural fairing 110. For example, as shown in
Referring to
In addition, as shown, the airflow separation anchors 104 typically include a wedge-shaped cross-section having a substantially flat distal end 107. As such, when mounted to the rotor blade 22, the airflow separation anchors 104 are configured to mimic a flatback airfoil.
In additional embodiments, as shown in
Further, as shown in
In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
In particular embodiments, the rotor blade assembly 100 may also include at least one structural component 114 configured between the airflow separation plate(s) 106 and the corresponding surface 23, 24 of the rotor blade 22. The structural component 114 may be, for example, rods, wedges, or webs, or any other suitable components that provide structural support. For example, as shown in
In still further embodiments, as shown in
Each airflow separation element(s) 102 according to the present disclosure may be formed from any suitable materials. For example, the material utilized to form the airflow separation element(s) 102 may preferably be lightweight, and may further preferably be suitably rigid to maintain its structure during use in a wind turbine 10. More specifically, the airflow separation element(s) 102 may be formed from fiberglass, aluminum, or any other suitable material.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they include structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
175355 | King | Mar 1876 | A |
573562 | Wittram | Dec 1896 | A |
1861065 | Poot | May 1932 | A |
RE19412 | Zaparka | Jan 1935 | E |
2071012 | Adams | Feb 1937 | A |
2126813 | Reid | Aug 1938 | A |
2225312 | Mason | Dec 1940 | A |
2238749 | Peltier | Apr 1941 | A |
D131271 | Colura | Feb 1942 | S |
2312219 | Sensenich | Apr 1943 | A |
2469167 | Little | May 1949 | A |
2899128 | Vaghi | Aug 1959 | A |
4089618 | Patel | May 1978 | A |
4204629 | Bridges | May 1980 | A |
4618313 | Mosiewicz | Oct 1986 | A |
4720244 | Kluppel et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4962826 | House | Oct 1990 | A |
5088665 | Vijgen et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5320491 | Coleman et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328329 | Monroe | Jul 1994 | A |
5492448 | Perry et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5522266 | Nicholson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533865 | Dassen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5819357 | Gould | Oct 1998 | A |
6352601 | Ray | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6491260 | Borchers et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6729846 | Wobben | May 2004 | B1 |
6733240 | Gliebe | May 2004 | B2 |
6779978 | Camargo | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6789769 | Mau et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6830436 | Shibata et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6910867 | Corten | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6966758 | Grabau et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7059833 | Stiesdal et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7328770 | Owens et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351041 | Uselton et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7413408 | Tafoya | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7458777 | Herr | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7604461 | Bonnet | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7632068 | Bak et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637721 | Driver et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7740206 | Eaton et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7828523 | Bonnet | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7883324 | Standish et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7976276 | Riddell et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7976283 | Huck | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8011887 | Fisher et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8052394 | Petsche | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083488 | Fritz | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083491 | Garcillan Rueda | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8182231 | Corten | May 2012 | B2 |
8192161 | Baker et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8226368 | Standish et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8267657 | Huck et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8317479 | Vronsky et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8376703 | Carroll et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8430633 | Carroll et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8834127 | Giguere et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9303621 | Fuglsang | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20010008032 | Llewellyn-Jones et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20030175121 | Shibata et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040253114 | Gunneskov et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070025858 | Driver et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041823 | Miller | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070065290 | Herr | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077150 | Llorente Gonzalez | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070294848 | Dumler | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001363 | Bhate | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080061192 | Sullivan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080977 | Bonnet | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080107540 | Bonnet | May 2008 | A1 |
20080166241 | Herr et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187442 | Standish et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080298967 | Gil et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090016891 | Parsania et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090074585 | Koegler et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090097976 | Driver et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090104038 | Grabau | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090126131 | Delaere et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090274559 | Petsche et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100028161 | Vronsky et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100068042 | Bruck et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100101037 | Gross et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100104436 | Herr et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100329879 | Presz, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110018282 | Hayashi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110042524 | Hemmelgarn et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110142637 | Riddell et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142666 | Drobietz et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110223030 | Huck et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120027588 | Carroll | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120027590 | Bonnet | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120134836 | Carroll | May 2012 | A1 |
20140093380 | Drobietz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140328692 | Riddell | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140334938 | Riddell | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102006043462 | Mar 2008 | DE |
0 652 367 | May 1995 | EP |
2028366 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2053240 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2138714 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2141358 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2216545 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2253838 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2270312 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2343451 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2514961 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2000120524 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2003254225 | Sep 2003 | JP |
WO 9821091 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 2004088130 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2008035149 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008113349 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008131800 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009025549 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2014016326 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014025252 | Feb 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report & Opinion issued in connection with corresponding EP Application No. 16165310.0 dated Aug. 17, 2016. |
Risoe National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, “Controllable Rubber Trailing Edge Flap May Ease Stress on Wind Turbine Blades”. Renewable Energy World.com, pp. 1-3, Feb. 17, 2010. |
Risoe National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, “Successful Wind Tunnel Test of Controllable Rubber Trailing Edge Flap for Wind Turbine Blades”. Science Daily, pp. 1-2, Feb. 19, 2010. |
Risoe National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, The Technical University of Denmark, “Flexible Trailing Edge Flap for Blades to Make Wind Power Cheaper”. Science Daily, pp. 1-2, Apr. 7, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160305398 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |