1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to building ventilation and, more particularly, to a damper used in a wall of a building to control air movement through the building.
2. Description of the Related Art
In large buildings, such as agricultural or industrial buildings, there are often employed large electric fans to move air through the building. Louvers, shutters or dampers are installed in the walls of the buildings adjacent the large fans. The damper is open when the fan is on to allow air movement through the damper and closed when the fan is off, thereby preventing hot or cold exterior air from entering the building.
These conventional dampers are opened and closed by electric motors to coordinate with the on/off operation of the electric fans. Of course, the need for electric motors requires extra maintenance for the motor, extra cost for the motor and the electrical system for the motor, extra use of electricity to power the motor, etc.
Accordingly, it is a purpose of the present invention to provide a damper which is more economical, cost-effective, and reliable, and which can open and close automatically without the need for an electric motor.
It is another purpose of the present invention to provide a damper that does not require electric motor operation.
It is another purpose of the present invention to provide a damper that helps prevent hot or cold air from penetrating through a closed damper.
It is another purpose of the present invention to provide a damper using hollow blades that have a relatively high “R” (insulation) value for energy efficiency.
It is still another purpose of the present invention to provide a damper providing a superior seal between the blades, and between the blades and a frame for the blades.
It is another purpose of this invention to provide a blade that has seals along the trailing edge thereof to provide a tight seal when the damper is in the closed position.
It is another purpose of the present invention to provide damper blades in an airfoil shape to help provide lift to open the damper via a change in air pressure.
It is further a purpose of the present invention to provide a blade that has a pivot point closer to a leading edge of the blade, which allows a pressure differential across the damper to help the damper open on its own, without the need for motorization.
It is yet another purpose of the present invention to provide a ladder bar to connect each blade to all other blades of the damper to create more uniform opening and closing motions.
Finally, it is another purpose of the present invention to provide blades that have end caps with an extension on a leading edge side thereof, and weights on the extensions which must be counteracted by the air pressure in order to open the damper.
To achieve the foregoing and other purposes of the present invention there is provided a damper having an open frame in which is arranged a plurality of aerodynamic vanes or blades that move together automatically based on air pressure changes.
The blades move from an open position, wherein the blades are spaced from each other and air moves through the damper between the blades, to a closed position, wherein the top and bottom edges of adjacent blades (except the uppermost and lowermost blades) overlap via seals, and the sides of the frame are sealed, so that air is essentially prevented from moving through the damper. With the uppermost blade, an upper (leading) edge is received by the top of the frame and a lower (trailing) edge overlaps the next adjacent blade upper edge. With the lowermost blade, a lower (trailing) edge is received by the bottom of the frame and an upper (leading) edge overlaps the next adjacent blade lower (trailing) edge.
Plural such dampers can be arranged adjacent to each other to provide a larger amount of airflow and/or to provide selective opening and closing of respective dampers.
The damper is part of a ventilation system which minimizes air leakage and energy loss relative to conventional ventilation systems incorporating dampers.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters designate the same or similar parts throughout the figures thereof.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
In the embodiment shown, there is one damper 10 having two side-by-side sets 30a and 30b of blades 30. Of course, only one set of blades 30 may be used in a damper 10, there may be more than two sets of blades 30 per damper 10, or a plurality of dampers 10 can be located throughout a building, each frame having one or more sets of blades.
The one or more dampers 10 are a part of a larger ventilation system employing one or more conventional electric fans 14. The one or more dampers 10 minimize air leakage when respective associated fans 14 to which the one or more dampers 10 are attached are off and allow for low energy losses when the associated fans 14 are operating.
Plural such dampers 10 can be arranged adjacent to each other in the wall 12 to provide a larger amount of airflow and/or to provide selective opening and closing of respective dampers 10.
The damper 10 generally includes a support or frame 20 and one or more vanes or blades 30 arranged horizontally within the frame 20.
As described below, the damper 10 also includes pivot mechanisms 60 having blade end pieces or end caps 70, 71 and ballast brackets 80, 81, as well as counter-weights 100, and a ladder bar 110.
The frame 20 is preferably rectangular and defines an opening 16 between top, bottom and right and left side portions 20a-20d, respectively. The two vertical sides 20c and 20d may be longer than the horizontal bottom/top.
In the embodiment shown in
The frame 20 should have outer dimensions like a traditional building wall damper and is intended to replace such a traditional damper to provide improved energy efficiency, ease of operation and maintenance. Of course, the damper 10 of this invention can be used in new building construction, in addition to replacement of conventional motor operated dampers.
The blades 30 move together in the frame 20, like a shutter, via the pivot mechanisms 60 and ladder bars 110 described below.
As shown in
An exemplary number of holes, i.e., fourteen, is shown in
The frame 20 is preferably metal, such as aluminum, but could be plastic or wood. In any case, the material must be durable, as the damper will likely be exposed to the elements, and should be structurally sturdy so as to be able to support reliably the other components of the damper 10 described herein, and to be attached to the wall 12.
As shown in
The seals 50 preferably include fiber seals or strips 54, such as a felt material. Of course, other materials could be used, such as a brush-like or rubber seal. In any case, the material used should help prevent air and light movement across the interface, not impede rotation of the blades 30 relative to the frame 20, and be durable enough to withstand many opening and closing cycles of the damper 10.
As also shown in
As noted above, these seals 50 seal against the end caps 70, 71 of the blades 30 described below, and edges 31, 32 of the blades 30 to reduce air and light leakage and improve energy efficiency. Thus, in addition to the improved thermal efficiency of the damper 10 due to the construction of the blades 30 discussed below, such efficiency is further enhanced by the use of these seals 50 between the blades 30 and the frame 20.
As shown in
More particularly, each blade 30 is an elongated member with first and second longitudinal edges, i.e., the leading edge 31 and the trailing edge 32, extending between two opposite ends, left end 33 and right end 34, a top 35 and a bottom 36. A seal 42, discussed below, is included in the trailing edge 42.
The blade 30 has a hollow core 37 with a central rib 45 extending longitudinally along the blade 30, as described further below.
The following dimensions are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the invention. The blade 30 may about 4.337 inches wide from the leading edge 31 to the trailing edge 32, and about 0.414 inches thick from the top 35 to the bottom 36 along a middle 38 thereof. A radius of the top 35 is about 7.496 inches and a radius of the bottom is about 21.453 inches. The thickness of the wall 39 making up the blade 30 is about 0.024 of an inch. The radius of the leading edge 31 is about 0.15 inches At the trailing edge 32, upper and lower corners 40 and 41 have a radius of about 0.041. The overall length of a blade 30, from end to end, may be about 60 inches.
This airfoil-shapes blade 30 allows air to flow through the opening 16 defined by the frame 20, when the blades 30 are not parallel with the frame 20, but doesn't allow the air flow through the opening 16, when the blades 30 are parallel with the frame 20.
When air pressure on a discharge side of the damper 10 is greater than the air pressure on an inlet side of the damper 10, the blades 30 close, preventing any movement of air across the sealed damper 10. When the pressure on the inlet side (leading edges 31 of the blades 30) becomes greater than the pressure on the discharge side, the airfoil shape of the blades allows the blades 30 to begin to rotate open (against the counter-weights 100 discussed below) and allow the air to flow through the damper 10. That is, as the air flow velocity across the blades 30 increases, the air enveloping each blade 30 starts to create a lifting force that begins opening the blades 30 until equilibrium is achieved between the lifting force of the air and the gravitational forces on the blade 30.
More particularly, air pressure “A” moving against the leading edge 31 of each blade 30 causes the blade 30 to rotate (see arrow “B”) from a closed, overlapping, essentially vertical state (see
No motorization is usually necessary to open/close the blades 30, as the damper 10 opens and closes automatically due to air pressure differences. Nonetheless, the damper 30 can be motorized, if desired, e.g., when used for air supply instead of air exhaust.
As best shown in
The two seal parts 43, 44 can be made of, e.g., a low durometer rubber or nylon, and are preferably co-extruded with the blade 30. Alternatively, the seals 43, 44 can be formed individually, or together, and attached to the trailing edge 32 of the blade 30 via a channel (not shown) formed in the trailing edge, or by adhesive, rivets, screws, etc.
Preferably one of the ribs 45 extends approximately along the central axis “C” of the elongated blade 30 and a pair of the ribs 46 extends along at least one edge of the blade 30, preferably the leading edge 31.
As shown in
As shown in
Since each blade 30 has a pivot point defined by the projecting pivot piece 74 that is closer to the leading edge 31 of the blade 32, this allows for a pressure differential across the damper 10 to help the blades 30 begin to open on their own under air pressure, as described herein, along the axis “D” parallel with the leading 31 and trailing 32 edges of the blade 30. Thus, unlike the conventional dampers, no electric motor is required to open and close the blades 30 on the damper 10, according to the present invention.
The end cap 70 may also include holes 75 to connect the end cap 70 to a ballast bracket discussed below.
Each end cap 70, 71 is preferably separately injection molded from plastic and inserted into the hollow opposite ends 33 and 34 of each blade 30 to close the hollow blade 30. That is, as shown particularly in
The end caps 70, 71 may be held to the blades 30 by ribs 68 formed on the outside of walls forming the projecting portions 76, 77. These ribs 68 provide outward force on the inside of the walls 39 of the blade 30. That is, the end caps 70, 71 can be attached to the open ends 33, 34 of the blades 30 via an interference fit between the ribs 68 and receptacles 86, as described below. Basically, each end cap 70, 71 is merely inserted and snapped into the open ends 33, 34 of the blade 30. Alternatively, other attachments, e.g., an industrial adhesive, or sonic welding can be used to connect the end caps 70, 71 to the blades 30.
These hollow and closed or capped blades 30 have a relatively high “R” (insulation) value for energy efficiency. That is, each blade's R value might be about 1.6 or 1.7, as an example only.
As shown in
More particularly,
At the first end 82 there is a hole 84 that receives a removable connector 102 to secure the weight 100 to the ballast bracket 80. The connector 102 may be, e.g., a bolt/nut, rivet, etc. At the second end 83 there is an opening 85 to receive the projecting portion 76 of the end cap 80 therethrough. As shown in
The weights 100 are preferably made of metal and serve to facilitate easy movement of the blades 30 and avoid the need for an electric motor to return the blades 30 to a closed position from the open position, once the air pressure stops. Instead, the weights could be plastic molded members with, e.g., metal therein, to provide the weight.
The weight 100 can be removably connected to the bracket 80, 81. Alternatively, a weight 110 could be molded as part of the pivot mechanism 60 and would not be removable, as discussed below.
The end caps 70, 71/ballast brackets 80, 81/weights 100 can be configured to accommodate the mass distribution of a given blade 30 length. In this regard, in a preferred embodiment, each weight will be about 2.25 grams. However, the formula for determining the size of the weight or ballast for a particular size of blade is “Ballast=0.335 (g/in)×length of the blade.” It is this weight that needs to be overcome in order to open the blade 30. In this regard, the airfoil design of the blade 30 facilitates the opening of the blade via changing air pressure against the effect of the weight.
As can be seen from the embodiment shown in
Rivets, screws, etc., can also be used at the holes 75, if desired, to further secure the brackets 80, 91 to the end caps 70, 71.
Alternatively, and preferably, as shown in
As shown in
Again, the air pressure “A” must be sufficient to overcome the weighted extension 64 in order to allow the blade 30 to open. Of course, inset molding can be used, wherein the pivot mechanism 60 is molded around a weight 100, which may be a multiple of weights, or material of different weights used for the body 62 and the extension 64.
The entire pivot mechanism 60 can be formed as one piece, with the weight 100 being included therein. Alternatively, any of the components described above, e.g., the blades, end caps, seals, weights, etc., can be formed individually and mechanically combined or any number of the components can be combined as one-piece.
As noted above, the damper 10 utilizes a counterweight system to assist in the opening of the blades 30. In this regard, a pre-calculated set of weights 100 is attached to the leading edge 31 sides of the blades 30.
Thus, the present invention provides blades 30 that have pivot mechanisms 60, each with an extension on each leading edge 31 side to allow for the reception of the counter weights 100 to assist in the opening motion of the damper 10 under air pressure A.
As shown in
One or more ladder bars 110 may be used. In the embodiment shown in
Also, the ladder bar 110 can be used for “lock down” of the damper 10, e.g., during a winter season, when the fans won't be operating and the damper will not be opened, and/or for security reasons at any time of the year.
Bushings, washers, lubricants, etc., can be provided at all pivot points, where necessary. Same facilitates movement of the damper 10 and reduces friction, especially over long-term use.
Any of the components noted above, especially the preferably plastic components like the blades 30 and end caps 70, 71, can be black for aesthetic purposes as well as to prevent light infiltration through the damper 10, when desired.
As described above, and as shown particularly in
The blades 30 are usually oriented vertically relative to the frame 20, with the leading edge 31 of the uppermost blade 30″ against the top 20a of the frame 20, and the trailing edge 32 of the uppermost blade 30″ sealed against the leading edge 31 of the next lower blade 30 via the seal 42, and the trailing edge 32 of the next lower blade 30 against the leading edge 31 of the next lower blade 30, and so on, until the trailing edge 32 of the lowest most blade 30′ seals against the wall 24. The ends of the blades 30 are sealed relative to the sides 20c and 20d of the frame by the felt seals 50. In this orientation, the damper 10 seals out air and light. Also, each weight 100 is positioned above the pivot point 74 near the frame 20.
When the air pressure A increases and moves against the airfoil shape of the blades 30, and is of an amount sufficient to counteract the weights, the blades 30 move from the vertical, overlapping orientation described above, wherein the weights 100 are near the frame 20, to a horizontal position, wherein the weights 100 are spaced from the frame 20 and the ladder bar 110 and relatively co-planar with the corresponding horizontal blade 30 to which it is attached. In the horizontal position, the air A is allowed to move between the spaced blades 30. As long as the air pressure is of an amount sufficient to overcome the affect of the weights, the airfoil blades stay in the relatively horizontal spaced position. When the air pressure A falls below this amount, the blades return to the original, vertical, overlapping position due to the weights.
In summary of the above, the present invention, in at least one embodiment, basically provides a damper that includes a frame and a plurality of hollow airfoil blades. Each blade has a leading edge, a trailing edge, a seal formed on the trailing edge, preferably by co-extrusion molding, and a pivot mechanism on either end of each blade. Each pivot mechanism includes an extension that includes a weight, either attached thereto or more preferably integrally formed therewith. A secondary seal is positioned between the pivot mechanisms and the sides of the frame. A ladder bar connects the pivot mechanisms so that the blades move in unison. At a significant enough change in air pressure, such as when a fan is turned on, and due to the airfoil shape, the affect of the weights is overcome, and the blades are caused to move from a first, closed, overlapping position relative to the frame, whereupon the seal on the trailing edge of a relatively upper blade seals against the leading edge of an adjacent relatively lower blade, and the secondary side frame seal seals against the pivot mechanisms, to a second, open position. The airfoil blades will stay in the second, open position as long as the air pressure is enough to overcome the affect of the weights. When the air pressure decreases below the amount of air pressure needed to overcome the affect of the weights, the blades return to the first, closed, overlapping position.
Based on the above-described structure and operation, the damper 10 according to the present invention saves energy due to less leakage of hot/cold air through the damper 10, improved insulation and the lack of any need for electricity to run a damper motor. Also, by not needing a motor, the construction is simpler, less costly to purchase and maintain, and more reliable. Further, the blades 30, each being a hollow but sealed member and being made from plastic, provide improved thermal insulation across the entire damper. The blades 30, along with the double seal 42 along the trailing edge 32 and the frame seals 50, reduce thermal, air and light leakage. Moreover, because each blade 30 is essentially removably mounted on the frame, it is easy to replace a damaged blade 30, change a weight 100, etc., if necessary.
While a preferred embodiment describes the use of a weight 100 on each pivot mechanism, the present invention should not be limited thereto. A weight 100 on only one of the end caps of each blade, weight(s) on every other blade end cap, or multiple weights on each end cap, may be suitable.
Further, while a preferred embodiment is described herein wherein a fan 14 is adjacent the damper 10, the invention is not limited thereto. That is, the damper 10 may be in one wall of a building and the fan(s) 14 may be in another wall, particularly is some horticultural or agricultural applications. In these cases, when the fan(s) is turned on, the damper 10 opens, as described above. Moreover, while the damper of this invention is described above for use in a building wall, the damper could be located elsewhere, e.g., in the roof of a building.
Moreover, while a preferred embodiment described above indicates the damper 10 is used with an electric fan, the damper according to the present invention provides benefits when there are changes in air pressure at the damper, e.g., from changing weather conditions, that are not caused by a fan. In this case, if the air pressure changes are adequate, the damper 10 still opens reliably. Thus, the present damper may be used whenever there is a desire to have a damper open when air pressure thereat changes enough pressure to open the damper blades against the weights 100, e.g., during tornado weather conditions. In any case, the airfoil design and counterweight system allows the blades to move under air pressure changes without an electric motor.
The foregoing is considered illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described. Accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to that fall within the scope of the invention and the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119 of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 62/235,985, filed Oct. 1, 2015, entitled “Airfoil Damper”, and of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 62/247,982, filed Oct. 29, 2015, entitled “Airfoil Damper”, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties into this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1706280 | Dyer | Mar 1929 | A |
1793802 | Hinton | Feb 1931 | A |
1973997 | Roberts | Sep 1934 | A |
2623581 | Nelson | Dec 1952 | A |
2697487 | Nelson | Dec 1954 | A |
2716786 | Moore | Sep 1955 | A |
3110936 | Berard | Nov 1963 | A |
3698429 | Lowe | Oct 1972 | A |
4083150 | Smith | Apr 1978 | A |
4189121 | Harper et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4263842 | Moore | Apr 1981 | A |
4334389 | Visser | Jun 1982 | A |
4341344 | Russell | Jul 1982 | A |
4516354 | Dugan | May 1985 | A |
RE32339 | Jones et al. | Jan 1987 | E |
4709506 | Lukaszonas | Dec 1987 | A |
4736677 | Smith | Apr 1988 | A |
4744290 | Josephson | May 1988 | A |
5001864 | Truscott | Mar 1991 | A |
5159783 | Rossiter | Nov 1992 | A |
5179802 | Higton | Jan 1993 | A |
5183390 | Amos | Feb 1993 | A |
5191735 | Ross | Mar 1993 | A |
5238453 | Heil | Aug 1993 | A |
5293920 | Vagedes | Mar 1994 | A |
5303507 | Oille | Apr 1994 | A |
5560147 | Ashida et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572831 | Rafiqui | Nov 1996 | A |
5630295 | Neiman | May 1997 | A |
5778598 | Ohanesian | Jul 1998 | A |
5794380 | Guardia | Aug 1998 | A |
5887386 | Alexanian et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5915960 | Check et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921028 | Marocco | Jul 1999 | A |
5924255 | Vagedes | Jul 1999 | A |
5941021 | Valls, Jr. et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6030179 | McCabe | Feb 2000 | A |
6039533 | McCabe | Mar 2000 | A |
6041547 | Marocco | Mar 2000 | A |
6098340 | Francis | Aug 2000 | A |
6190122 | McCabe | Feb 2001 | B1 |
D442272 | Gabriele | May 2001 | S |
6226922 | Swapp | May 2001 | B1 |
D443701 | Gabriele | Jun 2001 | S |
D445511 | Gabriele | Jul 2001 | S |
6263632 | Cadorette | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6386828 | Davis et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401391 | Gabriele | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6418665 | Gabriele | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6536162 | LaMay | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6601353 | Gabriele | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6602014 | Lee | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6616404 | Davis et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6655091 | Iwasaki | Dec 2003 | B1 |
D498000 | Griffiths | Nov 2004 | S |
6810621 | Ricci | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6810620 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6863245 | Gessler et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6953320 | Davis et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7018289 | Heil et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7082719 | Regnery | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104010 | Winner | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7354246 | Malone et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363748 | Gabriele | Apr 2008 | B2 |
D569994 | Platta et al. | May 2008 | S |
7510778 | Bernard et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7716884 | Jaycox | May 2010 | B2 |
7921602 | Ohanesian | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7963071 | Alexander et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8082693 | Marocco | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8091281 | Blachley | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8156688 | Tan | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8161682 | Marocco | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8281518 | Marocco | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8312676 | Maciulewicz | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8336256 | Jeffrey et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8371813 | Tsai et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8418967 | Hemmelgarn et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8474187 | Marocco | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8533996 | Stone | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8650801 | Ayshford et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8672649 | Smith et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678324 | Hemmelgarn et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8782951 | Dickison | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8783741 | Marocco | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8826593 | Baek | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8857106 | Colson | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8974184 | Becker et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9011099 | Wortman et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9021743 | Piermee | May 2015 | B2 |
9033283 | Hemmelgarn et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
20020076325 | Fink et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20060275626 | Bernard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286924 | Milana | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090084131 | Reifel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090193657 | Wilson, Jr. et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090252608 | Metivier | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100024340 | Claywell et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120273617 | Jensen | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130142681 | Bacon et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130145753 | Becker et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20150135696 | Becker et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Greenheck, “Actuators for Commercial HVAC Dampers (DA/101-02),” http://www.greenheck.com/library/articles/39, Jun. 1, 2002, printed Sep. 9, 2016, 5 pages. |
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”), “Shape Effects on Lift”, Glenn Research Center https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/shape.html, “last updated Apr. 5, 2018”, downloaded Sep. 7, 2018, 3 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Airfoil”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airfoil, Jul. 18, 2018, downloaded Aug. 3, 2018, 8 pages. |
NASA, NACA Airfoils, https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/langley/100/naca-airfoils, dated Jul. 31, 2017, downloaded Aug. 7, 2017, 2 pages. |
Google Images, “nasa airfoil”, https://www.google.com/search?g=nasa+airfoil&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwibjfLu1tvcAhVFeawKHaWFARAQsAR6BAgDEAE&biw=1600&bih=732, downloaded Aug. 7, 2018, 6 pages. |
Declaration of inventor Jan Cermak with Exhibits A-C, dated Aug. 7, 2018, 26 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170097171 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62247982 | Oct 2015 | US | |
62235985 | Oct 2015 | US |