This invention generally relates to an airfoil such as is utilized in an axial flow turbine. More particularly, this invention relates to a particular airfoil profile that reduces the stagnation heat transfer coefficient on the airfoil's surface.
Turbine airfoils utilized in axial flow turbines can operate at extreme temperatures. These elevated temperatures can lead to undesired oxidation and degradation of both the airfoil and platforms. For this reason, a cooling system is typically integrated into the airfoil to reduce the transfer of heat to the turbine airfoil. Known cooling systems focus on reducing heat transfer to all surfaces of the turbine airfoil to provide an overall reduction in airfoil metal temperature.
The region of largest heat transfer coefficient is located about the airfoil's stagnation point located on the leading edge of the airfoil. High temperature core gas encountering the leading edge of an airfoil will diverge around a suction and pressure side of the airfoil. Some of the high temperature core gas will impinge on the leading edge. The point on the airfoil where the velocity of the flowing gas approaches zero is the stagnation point. There is a stagnation point at every spanwise position along the leading edge collectively referred to as the stagnation line.
The heat transfer coefficient near the stagnation point of the airfoil is proportional to the local curvature of the airfoil surface. Therefore, the smaller the curvature or larger the radius of the airfoil section's surface, the smaller the heat transfer coefficient, and the lower the temperature along the airfoil. However, increasing the leading edge radius thereby reducing the local curvature about the stagnation point can undesirably affect aerodynamic performance.
Accordingly, it is desirable to develop and design an airfoil that reduces the surface temperatures of the airfoil at the leading edge while minimizing impact to aerodynamic performance.
An example airfoil includes a leading edge surface that features a non-continuous curvature distribution tailored to minimize heat transfer in a stagnation region of the airfoil.
The example airfoil includes a continuous surface with separate segments having different curvatures. A first segment includes the stagnation region and includes a first curvature that is less then a second and third curvature disposed within corresponding second and third segments disposed on either side of the first segment. The lower curvature of the first segment reduces the rate of heat transfer to the airfoil in the stagnation region without undesirably altering the aerodynamic performance of the airfoil.
The airfoil includes a fourth and fifth segment outboard of corresponding second and third segments. The forth and fifth segments include corresponding forth and fifth curvatures that are both less than the curvatures of the corresponding adjacent second and third segments.
Accordingly, the continuous surface includes a curvature that decreases at the stagnation region to reduce heat transfer into the airfoil.
These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
Referring to
Referring to
The amount of heat transfer from the airflow 15 into the leading edge 14 is determined in part by the shape and profile of the surface 20. In the stagnation region 21, heat transfer between the airflow 15 and the leading edge 14 can be reduced with a lower surface curvature. The curvature relates to the cross-sectional radius of a segment of the surface 20. The lower the curvature, the greater the radius. The curvature of the airfoil surface 20 in the stagnation region is related to the radius according to the relationship:
where k is the curvature of a surface; and
r is a radius of curvature of the surface.
The region of the leading edge surface 20 near the stagnation region includes very small changes in radius of curvature so the above relationship represents the curvature being proportional to the inverse of the radius of the surface 20. In other words, as the radius decreases over a portion of the surface 20 the curvature increases.
Reducing the overall curvature of the surface 20, and thereby increasing the radius can have an undesirable impact on aerodynamic performance of the airfoil 11. Accordingly, reducing the leading edge curvature by increasing the leading edge radius and in turn making the entire airfoil 11 cross-section larger is not always desirable.
Heat transfer from the airflow 15 into the leading edge 14 can be closely estimated by assuming that airflow about the leading edge 14 behaves much like airflow around a cylinder having a diameter d. Heat transfer of a cylinder in cross flow is a function of both the diameter of the cylinder and the reference angle θ in the stagnation region. Accordingly, heat transfer into the leading edge 14 can be accurately estimated by a simplified relationship for a cylinder in air flow according to the relationship:
Where hCyl is the heat transfer coefficient near the leading edge 14;
θ is a reference angle that is equal to 0 at the stagnation point 21;
d is the diameter of a cylinder.
Because of the relationship between curvature and heat transfer illustrated by the above relationship, an increase in curvature in regions adjacent to stagnation region 21 reduces heat transfer in the stagnation region 21 because the reference angle θ cubed is either decreasing faster than or equal to the rate that curvature is increasing along the surface 20.
The fourth segment 22 includes a fourth curvature. The fifth segment 26 includes a fifth curvature. The fourth and fifth segments 22, 26 are farthest from the stagnation region 21. The fourth curvature and the fifth curvature are similar to that of a conventional airfoil leading edge surface. The second segment 23 and the third segment 25 are located on either side of the first segment 24 and include a curvature that is greater than the fourth and fifth curvatures. Further, the curvatures of the second segment 23 and the third segment 25 are greater than the curvature of the first segment 24. The first segment 24 includes a reduced curvature relative to the adjacent second and third segments 23, 25.
The increased curvature of the first segment 24 is disposed over a width 27 to accommodate the stagnation region 21 and any movement of the stagnation region caused by changes in operational parameters.
The reduced curvature of the first segment tailors the surface 20 to the stagnation region 21 to reduce heat transfer to the airfoil 11. First and second segments 23 and 25 contain curvatures that are greater than the curvatures of the fourth and fifth segments 22 and 26 to provide for the creation of the lower curvature within the first segment 24 and the stagnation regions 21.
The resulting profile of continuous non-interrupted surface 20 includes a non-continuous curvature distribution that provides a relatively lower curvature within the stagnation region 21. The non-continuous curvature distribution tailors local curvature across the surface 20 to provide the desired localized heat transfer properties without substantially affecting desired aerodynamic performance.
Referring to
Although a preferred embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
This invention was made with government support under Contract No.: N00019-02-C-3003 awarded by the Air Force, Navy and Marines. The government therefore may have certain rights in this invention
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2788569 | Stalker | Apr 1957 | A |
2960305 | Stalker | Nov 1960 | A |
5035578 | Tran | Jul 1991 | A |
5117626 | North et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5337568 | Lee et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351917 | Bulman | Oct 1994 | A |
5383766 | Przirembel et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5711650 | Tibbott et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5779437 | Abdel-Messeh et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6050777 | Tabbita et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6099251 | LaFleur | Aug 2000 | A |
6139258 | Lang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6164912 | Tabbita et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6183197 | Bunker et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210112 | Tabbita et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6375126 | Sakurai et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6595748 | Flodman et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6609894 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6629817 | Shelton et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6669447 | Norris et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6994521 | Liang | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7018176 | Mongillo et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0924384 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1013877 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1262631 | Dec 2002 | EP |
Entry |
---|
W.F.N. Santos. “Leading-edge Bluntness Effects on Aerodynamic Heating and Drag of Power Law body in Low-Density Hypersonic Flow.” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. XXV11, No. 3, Jul. 2005, Sep. 2005, pafes 236-242, XP002670941, Rio de Janeiro. |
W.F.N. Santos: “Leading-edge Bluntness Effects on Aerodynamic Heating and Drag of Power Law Body in Low-Density Hypersonic Flow”, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. XXVII, No. 3, Jul. 2005, Sep. 2005, pp. 236-242, XP002670941, Rio de Janeiro. |
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 26, 2012 for EP Application No. 08253201.1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090148299 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |