Patent Grant
7438527
This invention relates generally to cooling of airfoils and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for cooling the trailing edges of gas turbine airfoils.
A well developed field exists regarding the investment casting of internally-cooled turbine engine parts such as blades and vanes. In an exemplary process, a mold is prepared having one or more mold cavities, each having a shape generally corresponding to the part to be cast. An exemplary process for preparing the mold involves the use of one or more wax patterns of the part. The patterns are formed by molding wax over ceramic cores generally corresponding to positives of the cooling passages within the parts. In a shelling process, a ceramic shell is formed around one or more such patterns in well known fashion. The wax may be removed such as by melting in an autoclave. This leaves the mold comprising the shell having one or more part-defining compartments which, in turn, contain the ceramic core(s) defining the cooling passages. Molten alloy may then be introduced to the mold to cast the part(s). Upon cooling and solidifying of the alloy, the shell and core may be mechanically and/or chemically removed from the molded part(s). The part(s) can then be machined and treated in one or more stages.
The ceramic cores themselves may be formed by molding a mixture of ceramic powder and binder material by injecting the mixture into hardened steel dies. After removal from the dies, the green cores are thermally post-processed to remove the binder and fired to sinter the ceramic powder together. The trend toward finer cooling features has taxed core manufacturing techniques. The fine features may be difficult to manufacture and/or, once manufactured, may prove fragile. Commonly-assigned co-pending U.S. Pat. No. 6,637,500 of Shah et al. discloses general use of a ceramic and refractory metal core combination. There remains room for further improvement in such cores and their manufacturing techniques.
The currently used ceramic cores limit casting designs because of their fragility and because cores with thickness dimensions of less than about 0.012-0.015 inches cannot currently be produced with acceptable casting yields.
The trailing edge cut-back geometry is one of the most utilized cooling configurations in airfoil design. This preferred application stems from two practical standpoints. First, the aerodynamic losses associated with such a blade attain the lowest values due to a thinner trailing edge. Second, airfoil high pressure side heat load to the part is reduced by using film cooling at the trailing edge pressure side.
Smaller trailing edge thickness leads to a lower pressure difference between the pressure and the suction sides of the airfoil. Trailing edge configurations without cut-back, known as centerline cooling tailing edges, with a pressure-to-suction side pressure ratio of about 1.35, results in trailing edge thickness in the order of 0.050 in. For these centerline discharge designs, the total pressure loss at 50 percent radial span could be as high as 3.75 percent. This relatively high pressure loss leads to undesirable high aerodynamic losses. A practical way to reduce these losses, is to use a pressure side ejection trialing edge configuration with a cut-back length. In such a configuration, the trailing edge can attain a thickness as low as 0.030 in. to reduce the aerodynamic losses. Typical of such a cut-back design is that shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,601,638, assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein by reference.
In this context, there are several internal cooling design features that control the heat transfer at the trailing edge. These can be summarized as follows: (1) size of the cooling passage; (2) internal cooling features inside the cooling passage; (3) trailing edge thickness distributions; (4) pressure side trailing edge lip thickness; (5) pressure side land roughness, and (6) slot film cooling coverage. It should be noted that only elements (1) and (2) can be used effectively for centerline discharge tailing edge designs; whereas all elements (1) through (6) can be used for the pressure side ejection design with a cut-back trailing edge. In the pressure side ejection designs, the thermal-mechanical fatigue and creep life will also improve with improved metal temperature distributions for the entire trailing edge region.
In general, the external thermal load on the airfoil pressure side is about two times that of the suction side, and therefore, there is a greater potential for pressure side fatigue to occur on the airfoil pressure side. Under cyclic conditions, crack nucleation may also occur sooner on the pressure side.
Since the airfoil trailing edge responds faster than the rest of the airfoil due to its lower thermal mass; these areas are particularly prone to fatigue failure. Crack nucleation leads to linkage with thermal-mechanical fatigue cracking, originating and propagating from the trailing edge. As cracks propagate, load shakedown will occur throughout the blade as the load is redistributed to other portions of the trailing edge. This is particularly true for rotating blades as the centrifugal load remains constant. Load shakedown leads to overload conditions, or conditions where the stresses in the blade may be above yield stress of the material as the load bearing blade area has decreased due to cracking. The material will start deforming plastically even at colder parts of the airfoil. This is an irreversible effect leading in all likelihood to blade liberation and failure. Thus, selection of the trailing edge pressure side ejection design for cooling a blade trailing edge region becomes crucial.
At the trailing edge regions, internal impingement configurations have been used in the gas turbine airfoil design. In general, cooling air is allowed to pass through rib cross-over openings leading to jet impingement onto subsequent ribs and surrounding walls. The flow acceleration is high through these cross-over impingement openings. The coolant flow Mach number profile follows that of the coolant static pressure profile in that it assumes an almost step-wise profile at these openings. The step-wise profiles are undesirable as they lead to relatively high peaks in internal heat transfer coefficients at the walls of the blade. In other words, there are regions in the airfoil trailing edge wall, which attain areas of relatively lower metal temperatures with high internal heat transfer coefficients. Meanwhile, other areas with lower internal convective heat transfer coefficients lead to relatively higher metal temperatures. These metal temperature differences lead to high thermal strains, which in conjunction with transient thermal stresses in the airfoil during take-off, in turn, lead to undesirable thermal-mechanical fatigue problems in the airfoil trailing edge.
Briefly, in accordance with one aspect of the invention, a trailing edge cooling design is provided for improving the internal profiles for Mach number, static pressure drop, and internal heat transfer coefficient distribution along the airfoil trailing edge.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a plurality of relatively small pedestals are formed, by the use of refractory metal cores, in an internal channel between the walls of the airfoil near the trailing edge so as to thereby provide improved cooling characteristics and avoid step wise profiles and their associated high thermal strains and mechanical fatigue problems in the airfoil trailing edge.
By yet another aspect of the invention, the internal surface of the suction side wall aft of the pressure side lip is made rough to enhance the coolant heat transfer coefficient at that location. In one form, a plurality of dimples are formed on that surface for that purpose.
In the drawings as hereinafter described, a preferred embodiment is depicted; however, various other modifications and alternate constructions can be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
a-5c shows a refractory metal core that is processed to obtain dimples on the trailing edge of a blade in accordance with the present invention.
The use of refractory metal core (RMC) casting techniques offer certain advantages over the prior art approach of casting with ceramic molds. Such a process is described in U.S. Patent Publication US2003/0075300 A1 assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein by reference.
One of the advantages of this RMC casting technology as recognized by the applicants, is that individual elements can be made much smaller than with conventional casting technologies and the features can be customized to almost any shape. Accordingly, the applicants have employed this technology to produce a refined and improved trailing edge cooling channel.
Referring to
Also shown in
The first row of pedestals as shown at 19 in
Moving downstream from the first two rows of pedestals, there is an array of relatively small, closely packed pedestals in several rows as indicated at 22, 23, 24 and 26. These pedestals are formed by corresponding rows of openings of the RMC core 11. The use of smaller, higher density pedestals is intended to provide for a smooth transition and pressure drop, resulting in a more continuous heat transfer coefficient distribution. In this regard, a comparison with the size and density of pedestals made with conventional core casting is appropriate. With conventional core casting, the diameter of a cylindrical pedestal is limited to diameters greater than 0.020 inches, and the gap between pedestals is limited to dimensions greater than 0.020 inches. In practice, because of low yield rates, both these dimensions would be substantially greater because of the fragility of the cores. In contrast, with the use of RMC castings, the diameter of cylindrical pedestals can be substantially below 0.020 inches and can be as small as 0.009 inches. Similarly, with RMC castings, the gap between pedestals can be reduced substantially below 0.020 inches, and can be reduced down to about 0.010 inches. With these reduced diameters and spacings, it is possible to obtain substantially improved uniform profiles of pressure, Mach number and heat transfer coefficients.
Although the pedestals are shown as being circular in cross section they can just as well be oval, racetrack, square, rectangular, diamond, clover leaf or similar shapes as desired.
In respect to the spacing between adjacent pedestals, it may be recognized that the closest spacing between pedestals is within a single row, such as shown in
In order to reduce aerodynamic losses, which degrade turbine efficiency, it is desirable to make the trailing edge of a turbine airfoil as thin as possible. One successful approach for doing is shown in
As will be understood, the
In addition to the small diameter of the pedestals as discussed hereinabove, the use of RMCs also facilitates the formation of the channel or slot 34 of significantly reduced dimensions. This, of course, results from the use of substantially thinner RMC than can be accomplished with the conventional core casting. That is, by comparison, a typical trailing edge pedestal array using conventional casting technology would have a considerably thicker core with larger features in order to allow the ceramic slurry to fully fill the core die when creating the core, in order to keep the ceramic core from breaking during manufacturing processes. Using conventional technology, the final cast part would have a wider flow channel through the trailing edge and larger features in the flow channel. This would result in high trailing edge cooling airflow with less convective cooling effectiveness. To be more specific, the slot width W (i.e. the thickness of a casting core) using conventional core casting, would necessarily be greater than 0.014 inches after tapering to the thinnest point, whereas with RMC casting use, the width W of the channel 34 can be in the range of 0.010-0.014 inches over its entire length. Such a reduction in slot size can significantly enhance the effectiveness of internal cooling airflow in the cooling of the trailing edge of an airfoil.
The description of the pedestals and slots as described above is related to the blade internal passageways for conducting the flow of cooling air toward the trailing edge of the blade. Another feature of the present invention will now be discussed in respect to an external area closer to the trailing edge of the blade.
As will be understood, the only cooling mechanism for the extreme trailing edge 32 of the airfoil is the convective heat transfer between the cooling air and metal on the suction side wall 35 near the trailing edge 32. This cooling can be made more effective by 1) increasing the trailing edge flow, which is typically not desirable, 2) decreasing the temperature of the trailing edge flow, which is dependent of the internal cooling circuit upstream of the suction side wall 35, or 3) increasing the convective heat transfer coefficient at the suction side wall 35 near the trailing edge 32. It is this third option which is accomplished by creating roughness in the form of positive dimples or similar features in the cut-back portion 35 of the suction side wall 33. Based on experimental studies, it is estimated that this roughness can increase the convective heat transfer by a factor of about 1.5.
Shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The result is shown in
As an example of the potential benefits of using dimples on a trailing edge slot roughness, consider the trailing edge cooling of a typical commercial high pressure turbine first blade. If the convective heat transfer at the suction side wall of the slot increases by a factor of 1.5 due to the additional positive dimples, the metal temperatures at the extreme trailing edge would be reduced by 60° F., given the same amount of cooling air flow. This is a very significant potential for reducing cooling air flow for increasing part life.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred mode as illustrated in the drawing, it will be understood by one skilled in the art that various changes in detail may be effected therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4180373 | Moore et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4601638 | Hill et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 6974308 | Halfmann et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 20050053459 | Cunha et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060239819 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |
