The present disclosure is directed to an airship and features therefor.
The present invention relates to an airship including aerodynamic, floatation, and deployable structures. Each of U.S. Pat. No. 7,866,601, issued Jan. 11, 2011, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/957,989 filed Dec. 1, 2010, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/222,355, filed Aug. 7, 2008, U.S. Pat. No. D583,294, issued Dec. 23, 2008, U.S. Design patent application Ser. No. 29/366,163, filed Jul. 20, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/366,125, filed Jul. 20, 2010 discloses subject matter related to the present invention and the contents of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Aerostatic lighter-than-air airships have seen substantial use since 1783 following the first successful manned flight of the Montgolfier brothers' hot air balloon. Numerous improvements have been made since that time, but the design and concept of manned hot air balloons remains substantially similar. Such designs may include a gondola for carrying a pilot and passengers, a heating device (e.g., a propane torch), and a large envelope or bag affixed to the gondola and configured to be filled with air. The pilot may then utilize the heating device to heat the air until the buoyant forces of the heated air exert sufficient force on the envelope to lift the balloon and an attached gondola. Navigation of such an airship has proven to be difficult, mainly due to wind currents and lack of propulsion units for directing the balloon.
To improve on the concept of lighter-than-air flight, some lighter-than-air airships have evolved to include propulsion units, navigational instruments, and flight controls. Such additions may enable a pilot of such an airship to direct the thrust of the propulsion units in such a direction as to cause the airship to proceed as desired. Airships utilizing propulsion units and navigational instruments typically do not use hot air as a lifting gas (although hot air may be used), with many pilots instead preferring lighter-than-air lifting gases such as hydrogen and helium. These airships may also include an envelope for retaining the lighter-than-air gas, a crew area, and a cargo area, among other things. The airships are typically streamlined in a blimp- or zeppelin-like shape, which, while providing reduced drag, may subject the airship to adverse aeronautic effects (e.g., weather cocking, a.k.a. wind cocking).
Airships other than traditional hot air balloons may be divided into several classes of construction: rigid, semi-rigid, non-rigid, and hybrid type. Rigid airships typically possess rigid frames containing multiple, non-pressurized gas cells or balloons to provide lift. Such airships generally do not depend on internal pressure of the gas cells to maintain their shape. Semi-rigid airships generally utilize some pressure within a gas envelope to maintain their shape, but may also have frames along a lower portion of the envelope for purposes of distributing suspension loads into the envelope and for allowing lower envelope pressures, among other things. Non-rigid airships typically utilize a pressure level in excess of the surrounding air pressure in order to retain their shape and any load associated with cargo carrying devices is supported by the gas envelope and associated fabric. The commonly used blimp is an example of a non-rigid airship.
Hybrid airships may incorporate elements from other airship types, such as a frame for supporting loads and an envelope utilizing pressure associated with a lifting gas to maintain its shape. Hybrid airships also may combine characteristics of heavier-than-air airship (e.g., airplanes and helicopters) and lighter-than-air technology to generate additional lift and stability. It should be noted that many airships, when fully loaded with cargo and fuel, may be heavier than air and thus may use their propulsion system and shape to generate aerodynamic lift necessary to stay aloft. However, in the case of a hybrid airship, the weight of the airship and cargo may be substantially compensated for by lift generated by forces associated with a lifting gas such as, for example, helium. These forces may be exerted on the envelope, while supplementary lift may result from aerodynamic lift forces associated with the hull.
A lift force (i.e., buoyancy) associated with a lighter-than-air gas may depend on numerous factors, including ambient pressure and temperature, among other things. For example, at sea level, approximately one cubic meter of helium may balance approximately a mass of one kilogram. Therefore, an airship may include a correspondingly large envelope with which to maintain sufficient lifting gas to lift the mass of the airship. Airships configured for lifting heavy cargo may utilize an envelope sized as desired for the load to be lifted.
Hull design and streamlining of airships may provide additional lift once the airship is underway, however, previously designed streamlined airships, in particular, may experience adverse effects based on aerodynamic forces because of such hull designs. For example, one such force may be weather cocking, which may be caused by ambient winds acting on various surfaces of the airship. The term “weather cocking” is derived from the action of a weather vane, which pivots about a vertical axis and always aligns itself with wind direction. Weather cocking may be an undesirable effect that may cause airships to experience significant heading changes based on a velocity associated with the wind. Such an effect may thereby result in lower ground speeds and additional energy consumption for travel. Lighter-than-air airships may be particularly susceptible to weather cocking and, therefore, it ray be desirable to design a lighter-than-air airship to minimize the effect of such forces.
On the other hand, airships having a hull shape with a length that is similar to the width may exhibit reduced stability, particularly at faster speeds. Accordingly, the aspect ratio of length to width (length:width) of an airship may be selected according to the intended use of the airship.
Landing and securing a lighter-than-air airship may also present unique problems based on susceptibility to adverse aerodynamic forces. Although many lighter than-air airships may perform “vertical take off and landing” (VTOL) maneuvers, once such an airship reaches a point near the ground, a final landing phase may entail ready access to a ground crew (e.g., several people) and/or a docking apparatus for tying or otherwise securing the airship to the ground. Without access to such elements, the airship may be carried away by wind currents or other uncontrollable forces while a pilot of the airship attempts to exit and handle the final landing phase. Therefore, systems and methods enabling landing and securing of an airship by one or more pilots may be desirable.
In addition, airships may include passenger and/or cargo compartments, typically suspended below the hull of the airship. However, such placement of a passenger/cargo compartment can have an adverse affect on aerodynamics and, consequently, performance capabilities of the airship. For example, an externally-mounted compartment increases drag in both fore-aft and port-starboard directions, thus requiring more power to propel the airship, and rendering the airship more sensitive to cross-winds. Further, because an externally-mounted compartment is typically on the bottom of the airship, the compartment is offset from the vertical center of the airship and, therefore, may lead to instability as the added drag due to the compartment comes in the form of forces applied substantially tangential to the outer hull of the airship, causing moments that tend to twist and/or turn the airship undesirably. Such adverse moments require stabilizing measures to be taken, typically in the form of propulsion devices and/or stabilizing members (e.g., wings). However, propulsion devices require power, and stabilizing members, while providing stability in one direction, may cause instability in another direction. For example, a vertically oriented stabilizer can provide lateral stability but may causes increased fore-aft drag, and may also render the airship more susceptible to cross winds. It would be advantageous to have an airship with a configuration that can carry passengers/cargo but does not cause the adverse affects typically associated with externally-mounted compartments and/or stabilizers mentioned above.
In addition, it may be desirable to be able to land an airship on water. However, externally mounted pontoons may exhibit excess drag, possibly causing instability. Accordingly it would be advantageous to have an airship with floatation structures that do not cause such excess drag.
Further, it may be desirable to be able to deploy various types of industrial apparatus from an airship. However, as noted above, any externally mounted apparatus may cause excess drag, and thus, instability. Therefore, it would be advantageous to have an airship with deployable apparatuses that do not cause excess drag as such.
The present disclosure is directed to addressing one or more of the desires discussed above utilizing various exemplary embodiments of an airship.
In one exemplary aspect, the present disclosure is directed to an airship. The airship includes a hull configured to contain a gas, at least one propulsion assembly coupled to the hull and including a propulsion device, and at least one aerodynamic component including a plurality of fairing structures including one or more slats, wherein the at least one aerodynamic component is associated with the hull and is configured to direct airflow around the airship.
In another exemplary aspect, the present disclosure is directed to an airship. The airship includes a hull configured to contain a gas, at least one propulsion assembly coupled to the hull and including a propulsion device, and at least one floatation structure configured to support the airship during a water landing.
In a further exemplary aspect, the present disclosure is directed to an airship. The airship includes a hull configured to contain a gas, at least one propulsion assembly coupled to the hull and including a propulsion device, and at least one deployable apparatus housed within the hull and deployable from the hull for operation unrelated to the flight control or landing of the airship.
Reference will now be made in detail to the drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
The accompanying figures depict exemplary embodiments of an airship 10. Airship 10 may be configured for VTOL as well as navigation in three dimensions (e.g., X, Y, and Z planes). As shown in
Throughout this discussion of various embodiments, the terms “front” and/or “fore” will be used to refer to areas within a section of airship 10 closest to forward travel, and the term “rear” and/or “aft” will be used to refer to areas within a section of airship 10 closest to the opposite direction of travel. Moreover, the term “tail” will be used to refer to a rear-most point associated with hull 12, while the term “nose” will be used to refer to the forward-most point within the front section of hull 12.
The accompanying figures illustrate various axes relative to the exemplary airship 10 for reference purposes. For example, as shown in
Hull
Hull 12 may include a support structure 20 (see
To maximize a lifting capacity associated with airship 10, it may be desirable to design and fabricate support structure 20 such that weight associated with support structure 20 is minimized while strength, and therefore resistance to aerodynamic forces, for example, is maximized. In other words, maximizing a strength-to-weight ratio associated with support structure 20 may provide a more desirable configuration for airship 10. For example, one or more of frame members 22 may be constructed from light weight, but high strength, materials including, for example, a substantially carbon-based material (e.g., carbon fiber) and/or aluminum, among other things.
Hull 12 may be configured to retain a volume of lighter-than-air gas. In some embodiments, hull 12 may include at least one envelope 282 sewn or otherwise assembled of fabric or material configured to retain a lighter-than-air gas, as shown in
Lighter-than-air lifting gasses for use within envelope 282 of hull 12 may include, for example, helium, hydrogen, methane, and ammonia, among others. The lift force potential of a lighter-than-air gas may depend on the density of the gas relative to the density of the surrounding air or other fluid (e.g., water). For example, the density of helium at 0 degrees Celsius and 101.325 kilo-Pascals may be approximately 0.1786 grams/liter, while the density of air at 0 degrees C. and 101.325 kilo-Pascals may be approximately 1.29 g/L. Neglecting the weight of a retaining envelope, equation (1) below illustrates a simplified formula for calculating a buoyant force, Fbuoyant, based on volume of a lighter-than-air gas, where Df is a density associated with an ambient fluid, Dlta is a density associated with the lighter-than-air gas, gc is the gravity constant, and V is the volume of the lighter-than-air gas.
Fbuoyant=(Df−Dlta)*gc*V (1)
Simplifying the equation based on a volume of helium suspended within air at 0 degrees C. and 101.325 kilo-Pascals, a buoyant force may be determined to be approximately Fbouyant/gc=1.11 grams per liter (i.e., approximately 1 kg per cubic meter of helium). Therefore, based on the lighter-than-air gas chosen, an internal volume of first envelope 282 associated with hull 12 may be selected such that a desired amount of lift force is generated by a volume of lighter-than-air gas. Equation (2) below may be utilized to calculate such a desired volume for aerostatic lift, taking into account the mass, M, of airship 10.
V>M/(Df−Dlta) (2)
In addition, in some embodiments, hull 12 may be formed of a self-sealing material. One or more layers of hull 12 may be selected from known self-sealing materials, e.g., a viscous substance.
Hull 12 of airship 10 may have a three-dimensional shape that is selected according to intended functionality and use of the airship. Factors that may be considered in selecting an airship shape may include the size, weight, and/or placement of the intended payload, speed of travel, range, longevity, maneuverability, etc. According to these and other factors, a number of design variables, many having an influence on hull shape, may be considered and balanced in arriving at a hull shape. Such variables may include, for example, volume/capacity of lighter than air gas, drag coefficient (including frontal, side, and vertical drag), weight, stability, etc.
In some embodiments, hull 12 of airship 10 may be “lenticular” in shape, i.e., substantially an oblate spheroid having a length, a width, and a height, wherein the length and the width have approximately the same dimension. (See
In other embodiments, hull 12 of airship 10 may be substantially oblong. That is, hull 12 may have a length, a width, and a height, wherein an aspect ratio between the length and the width is greater than 1 to 1 (1:1). For example, in some embodiments the aspect ratio of hull length to hull width may be between approximately 4:3 and 2:1. Particularly, in some embodiments, the aspect ratio may be approximately 4:3, as shown in
In addition to aerostatic lift generated by retention of a lighter-than-air gas, hull 12 may be configured to generate at least some aerodynamic lift when placed in an airflow (e.g., airship 10 in motion and/or wind moving around hull 12) based on the aerodynamic shape of hull 12 and/or on an associated angle of attack and airflow velocity relative to airship 10.
As shown in
Propulsion Assemblies
As shown in
Power conversion unit 415 may be adjustable such that an angle of attack of power conversion unit 415 may be modified. This may allow for modification to thrust intensity and direction based on the angle of attack associated with power conversion unit 415. For example, where power conversion unit 415 is configured as an adjustable airfoil (e.g., variable-pitch propellers), power conversion unit 415 may be rotated through 90 degrees to accomplish a complete thrust reversal. Power conversion unit 415 may be configured with, for example, vanes, ports, and/or other devices, such that a thrust generated by power conversion unit 415 may be modified and directed in a desired direction. Alternatively (or in addition), direction of thrust associated with power conversion unit 415 may be accomplished via manipulation of propulsion unit mount 430.
As shown in
According to some embodiments, propulsion unit mount 430 may include pivot assemblies configured to allow a rotation of propulsion assemblies 31 about one or more axes (e.g., axes 465 and 470) in response to a control signal provided by, for example, computer 600 (see, e.g.,
Functions associated with propulsion system 30 may be divided among a plurality of propulsion assemblies 31 (e.g., five propulsion assemblies 31). For example, propulsion assemblies 31 may be utilized for providing a lift force for a vertical take-off such that the forces of the lighter-than-air gas within first envelope 282 are assisted in lifting by a thrust force associated with the propulsion assemblies 31. Alternatively (or in addition), propulsion assemblies 31 may be utilized for providing a downward force for a landing maneuver such that the forces of the lighter-than-air gas within first envelope 282 are counteracted by a thrust force associated with the propulsion assemblies 31. In addition, horizontal thrust forces may also be provided by propulsion assemblies 31 for purposes of generating horizontal motion (e.g., flying) associated with airship 10.
It may be desirable to utilize propulsion assemblies 31 for controlling or assisting in control of yaw, pitch, and roll associated with airship 10. For example, as shown in
In other exemplary embodiments, for example, where it is desired to cause a pitching motion associated with airship 10, fore propulsion assembly 532 may be rotated such that a thrust force associated with fore propulsion assembly 532 may be directed parallel to yaw axis and toward the ground (i.e., down) or toward the sky (i.e., up), based on the desired pitch. Upon operation of fore propulsion assembly 532, airship 10 may then be caused to pitch in reaction to the directed thrust associated with fore propulsion assembly 532.
According to still other embodiments, for example, where it is desired to cause a rolling motion associated with airship 10, starboard propulsion assembly 533 may be rotated such that a thrust force associated with starboard propulsion assembly 533 may be directed parallel to yaw axis 7 and toward the ground (i.e., down) or toward the sky (i.e., up) based on the desired roll, and/or port propulsion assembly 534 may be rotated such that a thrust force associated with port propulsion assembly 534 may be directed in a direction opposite from the direction of the thrust force associated with starboard propulsion assembly 533. Upon operation of starboard propulsion assembly 533 and port propulsion assembly 534, airship 10 may then be caused to roll in reaction to the directed thrusts. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that similar results may be achieved using different combinations and rotations of propulsion assemblies 31 without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
Fore, starboard, and port propulsion assemblies 532, 533, and 534 may also be configured to provide thrust forces for generating forward or reverse motion of airship 10. For example, starboard propulsion unit 533 may be mounted to propulsion mount 430 and configured to pivot from a position in which an associated thrust force is directed in a downward direction (i.e., toward the ground) to a position in which the associated thrust force is directed substantially parallel to roll axis 5 and toward the rear of airship 10. This may allow starboard propulsion unit 533 to provide additional thrust to supplement thrusters. Alternatively, starboard propulsion unit 534 may be rotated from a position in which an associated thrust force is directed substantially parallel to roll axis 5 and toward the rear of airship 10, to a position where the associated thrust force is directed along pitch axis 6 such that an adverse wind force may be counteracted.
In addition to fore, starboard, and port propulsion assemblies 532, 533, and 534, respectively, propulsion system 30 may include one or more starboard thrusters 541 and one or more port thruster 542 configured to provide horizontal thrust forces to airship 10. Starboard and port thrusters 541 and 542 may be mounted to keel hoop 120, lateral frame members 122, horizontal stabilizing members 315, or any other suitable location associated with airship 10. Starboard and port thrusters 541 and 542 may be mounted using an operative propulsion unit mount 430 similar to that described above, or, alternatively, starboard and port thrusters 541 and 542 may be mounted such that minimal rotation or pivoting may be enabled (e.g., substantially fixed). For example, starboard and port thrusters 541 and 542 may be mounted to keel hoop 120 at an aft location on either side of vertical stabilizing member 310 (e.g., at approximately 160 degrees and negative 160 degrees, as shown in
In some embodiments, thrust from starboard and port thrusters 541 and 542 may be directed along a path substantially parallel to roll axis 5. Such a configuration may enable thrust forces associated with starboard and port thrusters 541 and 542 to drive airship 10 in a forward or reverse direction based on the thrust direction.
In some embodiments, thrust from starboard and port thrusters 541 and 542 may be configurable based on a position of associated propulsion unit mount 430. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional configurations for starboard and port thrusters 541 and 542 may be utilized without departing from the scope of this disclosure.
Power Supply System
As shown in
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize the requirements of solar panels suitable for the applications disclosed herein. Further, the disclosed configurations and placement of solar panels shown and discussed herein are not intended to be limiting, and persons of ordinary skill in the art will understand that additional embodiments are possible.
Solar panels 1010 may be operatively coupled to one or more electric motors 1020, and configured to supply power to one or more electric motors 1020 for driving power conversion units 415. In addition, power supply system 1000 may include one or more batteries 1030 operatively coupled to solar panel 1010 and configured to receive and store electrical energy supplied by solar panel 1010, and may further be operatively coupled to electric motors 1020 to supply power to electric motors 1020.
Batteries 1030 may each be located within an outer envelope of airship 10 defined by hull 12 of airship 10. Batteries 1030 may be disposed in respective positions providing ballast.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize suitable operative connections between solar panel 1010, batteries 1030, and electric motors 1020, according to the arrangements described above.
Cargo System
As used herein, the term “cargo” is intended to encompass anything carried by airship 10 that is not a part of airship 10. For example, the term “cargo,” as used herein, refers to freight, as well as passengers. Further, the term “passengers” is intended to encompass not only persons along for the ride, but also pilots and crew.
As shown in
Although the figures show cargo compartments 1110 generally disposed in the bottom portion of airship 10 and having a lower surface that conforms to, or is substantially continuous with, the envelope defined by hull 12, cargo compartments 1110 may have any suitable shape. Further, cargo compartments 1110 may be disposed in a location other than the bottom of airship 10. For example, embodiments are envisioned that include a passenger compartment disposed near the top portion of hull 12. Such embodiments may be practical, for example, if the passenger compartment is relatively small, e.g., to only hold a flight crew and/or several passengers.
In some embodiments, cargo compartments 1110 may be relatively small compared to the overall size of airship 10, as shown in
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the size, shape, and location may be selected according to numerous parameters related to the intended operation of the airship, such as weight, ballast, desired lifting gas volume (since the internally-located cargo compartments come at the expense of lifting gas volume), etc. For example, in some embodiments one or more of cargo compartments 1110 may be disposed at a location such that a static equilibrium associated with airship 10 may be maintained. In such embodiments, a cargo compartment 1110 may be mounted, for example, at a location along roll axis 5, such that a moment about pitch axis 6 associated with the mass of the cargo compartment (or the mass of the cargo compartment including contents having a predetermined mass) substantially counteracts a moment about pitch axis 6 associated with the mass of empennage assembly 25. Furthermore, the placement of cargo compartments 1110 within the envelope of hull 12, places the mass of cargo compartments 1110 and any contents therein closer to both roll axis 5 and pitch axis 6, thus reducing moments associated with placement of such mass at distances from these axes. Similarly, positioning of cargo compartments 1110 relative to yaw axis 7 may also be taken into consideration.
In some embodiments, cargo compartments 1110 may include a suitable means of access, such as a ladder, stairs, or ramp. In other embodiments, at least one cargo compartment 1110 of airship 10 may include a transport system 1140 configured to lower and raise at least a portion of cargo compartment 1110 to facilitate loading and unloading of cargo compartment 1110.
Bladders
Airship 10 may include one or more bladders 1200 inside hull 12 for containing a lighter-than-air gas, as shown in
In some embodiments, bladders 1200 may be formed of a self-sealing material. As discussed above with respect to hull 12, persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize self-sealing technologies suitable for implementation in bladders 1200.
As an alternative to, or in addition to, multiple bladders 1200, envelope 282 associated with hull 12 may be divided by a series of “walls” or dividing structures (not shown) within envelope 282. These walls may create separated “compartments” that may each be filled with a lighter-than-air lifting gas individually. Such a configuration may mitigate the consequences of the failure of one or more compartments (e.g., a leak or tear in the fabric) such that airship 10 may still possess some aerostatic lift upon failure of one or more compartments. In some embodiments, each compartment may be in fluid communication with at least one other compartment, and such walls may be fabricated from materials similar to those used in fabrication of envelope 282, or, alternatively (or in addition), different materials may be used. According to some embodiments, envelope 282 may be divided into four compartments using “walls” created from fabric similar to that used to create envelope 282. One of skill in the art will recognize that more or fewer compartments may be utilized as desired.
One or more of the compartments or bladders 1200 within envelope 282 may include one or more fill and/or relief valves (not shown) configured to facilitate inflation, while minimizing the risk of over-inflation of envelope 282 and/or bladders 1200. Such valves may be designed to allow entry of a lighter-than-air gas as well as allowing escape of lighter-than-air gas upon an internal pressure reaching a predetermined value (e.g., about 150 to 400 Pascals). One of skill in the art will recognize that more or fewer fill/relief valves may be used as desired and that relief pressures may be selected based on materials associated with envelope 282 and/or bladders 1200, among other things.
Airship 10 may also include a second envelope 283 (see
Empennage Assembly
According to some embodiments, as shown in
Vertical stabilizing member 310 may be pivotally affixed to a point on empennage assembly 25. During operation of airship 10, vertical stabilizing member 310 may be directed substantially upward from a mounting point of empennage assembly 25 to support structure 20 while the upper-most point of vertical stabilizing member 310 remains below or substantially at the same level as the uppermost point on the top surface of hull 12. Such a configuration may allow vertical stabilizing member 310 to maintain isotropy associated with airship 10. Under certain conditions (e.g., free air docking, high winds, etc.), vertical stabilizing member 310 may be configured to pivot about a pivot assembly within a vertical plane such that vertical stabilizing member 310 comes to rest in a horizontal or downward, vertical direction, and substantially between horizontal stabilizing members 315. Such an arrangement may further enable airship 10 to maximize isotropy relative to a vertical axis, thereby minimizing the effects of adverse aerodynamic forces, such as wind cocking with respect to vertical stabilizing member 310. In some embodiments consistent with the present disclosure, where hull 12 includes a thickness dimension of 7 meters and where empennage assembly 25 is mounted to keel hoop 120 and longitudinal frame member 124, vertical stabilizing member 310 may have a height dimension ranging from about 3 meters to about 4 meters.
Vertical stabilizing member 310 may also include one or more vertical control surfaces 350 configured to manipulate airflow around vertical stabilizing member 310 for purposes of controlling airship 10. For example, vertical stabilizing member 310 may include a rudder configured to exert a side force on vertical stabilizing member 310 and thereby, on empennage mount 345 and hull 12. Such a side force may be used to generate a yawing motion about yaw axis 7 of airship 10, which may be useful for compensating for aerodynamic forces during flight. Vertical control surfaces 350 may be operatively connected to vertical stabilizing member 310 (e.g., via hinges) and may be communicatively connected to systems associated with a pilot cockpit (e.g., operator pedals) or other suitable location. For example, communication may be established mechanically (e.g., cables) and/or electronically (e.g., wires and servo motors 346 and/or light signals) with the cockpit or other suitable location (e.g., remote control). In some embodiments, vertical control surfaces 350 may be configured to be operated via a mechanical linkage 351. In some cases, mechanical linkage 351 may be operably connected to one or more servo motors 346, as shown in
Horizontal stabilizing members 315 associated with empennage assembly 25 may be configured as airfoils and may provide horizontal stability and assistance in pitch control of airship 10. Horizontal stabilizing members 315 may include a leading edge, a trailing edge, one or more spars, and one or more horizontal control surfaces 360 (e.g., elevators).
In some embodiments, horizontal stabilizing members 315 may be mounted on a lower side of hull 12 in an anhedral (also known as negative or inverse dihedral) configuration. In other words, horizontal stabilizing members 315 may extend away from vertical stabilizing member 310 at a downward angle relative to roll axis 5. The anhedral configuration of horizontal stabilizing members 315 may allow horizontal stabilizing members 315 to act as ground and landing support for a rear section of airship 10. Alternatively, horizontal stabilizing members 315 may be mounted in a dihedral or other suitable configuration.
According to some embodiments, horizontal stabilizing members 315 may be operatively affixed to empennage mount 345 and/or vertical stabilizing member 310 independent of hull 12. Under certain conditions (e.g., free air docking, high winds, etc.) empennage assembly 25 may be configured to allow vertical stabilizing member 310 to pivot within a vertical plane, such that vertical stabilizing member 310 comes to rest substantially between horizontal stabilizing members 315.
Horizontal stabilizing members 315 may also include one or more horizontal control surfaces 360 (e.g., elevators) configured to manipulate airflow around horizontal stabilizing members 315 to accomplish a desired effect. For example, horizontal stabilizing members 315 may include elevators configured to exert a pitching force (i.e., up or down force) on horizontal stabilizing members 315. Such a pitching force may be used to cause motion of airship 10 about pitch axis 6. Horizontal control surfaces 360 may be operatively connected to horizontal stabilizing members 315 (e.g., via hinges) and may be mechanically (e.g., via cables) and/or electronically (e.g., via wires and servo motors 347 and/or light signals) controlled from a pilot cockpit or other suitable location (e.g., remote control). In some embodiments, horizontal control surfaces 360 may be configured to be operated via a mechanical linkage 349. In some cases, mechanical linkage 349 may be operably connected to one or more servo motors 347, as shown in
Empennage mount 345 may include pins, hinges, bearings, and/or other suitable devices to enable such a pivoting action. In some embodiments, vertical stabilizing member 310 may be mounted on a swivel pin (not shown) associated with empennage mount 345 and may include a latching mechanism (not shown) configured to operatively connect vertical stabilizing member 310 to keel hoop 120 and/or other suitable location. Latching mechanism (not shown) may include hawksbill latches, slam latches, spring loaded pins, striker plates, hydraulic actuators, and/or any other combination of suitable mechanisms. Control of latching mechanism (not shown) and pivoting of vertical stabilizing member 310 may be achieved utilizing mechanical (e.g., via cables) and/or electrical (e.g., via control signals and servo motors), or any other suitable control methods (e.g., via hydraulics).
Rear Landing Gear
When, for example, horizontal stabilizing members 315 are configured in an anhedral arrangement (i.e., angled downward away from hull 12) and are connected to a lower side of airship 10, horizontal stabilizing members 315 may function as ground and landing support for a rear section of airship 10. Accordingly, empennage assembly 25, specifically horizontal stabilizing members 315 may provide support for rear landing gear assembly 377.
Rear landing gear assembly 377 may be operatively connected to each airfoil associated with horizontal stabilizing members 315 (e.g., as shown in
In some embodiments, rear landing gear assembly 377 may include a single wheel mounted on an axle operatively connected via oleo-pneumatic shock-absorbers to horizontal stabilizing members 315 at an outer-most tip of each airfoil. Such a configuration may allow rear landing gear assembly 377 to provide a damping force in relation to an input (e.g., forces applied during touchdown and landing). Horizontal stabilizing member 315 may further assist in such damping based on configuration and materials used. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that rear landing gear assemblies 377 may include more or fewer elements as desired.
Rear landing gear assembly 377 may be configured to perform other functions including, for example, retracting and extending (e.g., with respect to horizontal stabilizing members 315), and/or adjusting for a load associated with airship 10. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that numerous configurations may exist for rear landing gear assembly 377 and any such configuration is meant to fall within the scope of this disclosure.
Front Landing Gear
According to some embodiments, support structure 20 may be configured to provide support as well as an operative connection to front landing gear assembly 777 (see
In some embodiments, front landing gear assembly 777 may be mounted on passenger compartment 1120, and may be deployed by virtue of the extension/lowering of passenger compartment 1120, as shown in
According to some embodiments, front landing gear assembly 777 may be configured to perform other functions including, for example, steering airship 10 while on the ground, retracting, extending, adjusting for load, etc. For example, front landing gear assembly 777 may include an operative connection to passenger compartment 1120 such that front landing gear assembly 777 may be turned to cause airship 10 to head in a desired direction while moving on the ground. Such a connection may include a rack and pinion, a worm gear, an electric motor, and/or other suitable devices for causing front landing gear assembly 777 to turn in response to a steering input.
According to some embodiments, front landing gear assembly 777 may include an operative connection to a steering control associated with a yoke in passenger compartment 1120. An operator may turn the yoke causing a signal indicative of a steering force to be sent to computer 600. Computer 600 may then cause an electric motor associated with front landing gear assembly 777 to cause front landing gear assembly 777 to turn in a direction indicated by the steering force input from the operator. Alternatively, steering may be accomplished via a mechanical connection (e.g., cables, hydraulics, etc.) or any other suitable method. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that a steering control may be linked to flight controls, a dedicated steering control, and/or other suitable control without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
Aerodynamic Components
According to some embodiments, hull 12 may include one or more aerodynamic components 2000 to provide stabilization of airship 10. Aerodynamic components 2000 may be associated with hull 12 and may be configured to direct airflow along airship 10. For example, in some embodiments, as shown in
In some embodiments, multiple aerodynamic components 2000 may be disposed separately on hull 12, as shown for example in
Alternatively, or additionally, two or more aerodynamic components 2000 may abut one another and/or overlap one another, as shown in
Aerodynamic component 2000 may be configured to minimize the susceptibility of airship 10 to winds passing over airship 10 off-axis with respect to aerodynamic component 2000, that is, in a direction that is not aligned (i.e., not parallel) with slats 2010. For example, in some embodiments, slats 2010 may be integrated into hull 12, such that the surface shape of hull 12 remains unchanged, and aerodynamic component 2000 may be exposed to airflow by a relatively small opening in hull 12, as shown in
Slats 2010 may be made of any suitable material. In some embodiments, slats 2010 may be formed of a rigid material, such as plastic, carbon fiber, aluminum, titanium, etc. Some embodiments may alternatively, or additionally, include slats 2010 formed of a flexible material, such as a fabric, e.g., the same fabric that may be used to form hull 12, Slats 2010 may have a uniform cross sectional shape along the length thereof, e.g., a thin-walled partition. Some embodiments may include slats 2010 having a non-uniform cross-sectional shape. For example, slats 2010 may have an airfoil shape (e.g., in a fore-aft direction), or a modified airfoil shape, such as a kamm tail.
In some embodiments, slats 2010 may be parallel, as shown in
Aerodynamic components 2000 may include inside wall surfaces of airflow passages 2020 that may be substantially planar, or may be curved. In some embodiments, as shown in
Flotation Structures
According to some embodiments, airship 10 may include at least one floatation structure 4000 configured to support airship 10 for floatation on water during a water landing. In some embodiments, hull 12 may include a floatation structure. For example, as shown in
In some embodiments, airship 10 may include multiple sets of floatation structures 4000. For example, as shown in
As shown in
Deployable pontoons may be formed with surface aspects of a hydrofoil. In some embodiments, outboard pontoons 4010, main pontoons 4020, deployable main pontoons 4040, and/or deployable outboard pontoons 4050 may be formed with a cross-sectional shape similar to catamaran-style hydroplane race boat hulls, as shown, for example, in
Deployable Apparatus
According to some embodiments, airship 10 may include a deployable apparatus 5000. Deployable apparatus 5000 may be housed within hull 12 and deployable from hull 12 for operation unrelated to the flight control or landing of airship 10. For example, as shown in
Flight control systems of airship 10 may be configured to maintain airship 10 stationary and stable during drilling operations. In some embodiments, airship 10 may include anchor-like devices (not shown), which may fix airship 10 to the sea floor, either via a tether or a more rigid attachment. In some embodiments, airship 10 may be maintained stationary via operation of the flight control system and/or using sea floor fixation, in such a manner to facilitate oil and/or natural gas drilling operations, or operations to harvest other natural resources.
In some embodiments, airship 10 may be suited for relatively shallow water drilling. Further, deployable apparatus 5000 may also be incorporated in an embodiment of airship 10 equipped for ground landing (as opposed to water landing). Also, in some embodiments, airship 10 may be configured for drilling shallow holes. For example, a suitable application may include drilling of holes for installation and/or construction of support pylons. Other types of apparatus may be deployable from airship 10. Such apparatuses may include, for example, construction equipment, demolition equipment, firefighting equipment, lifting and transportation equipment (e.g., a forklift-type apparatus), aircraft and/or watercraft refueling equipment, water removal/pumping equipment, weather monitoring equipment, etc.
The disclosed airship 10 may be implemented for use in a wide range of applications. For example, in some embodiments, airship 10 may be configured to perform functions involving traveling from one location to another. For instance, airship 10 may be configured to perform a function associated with at least one of lifting objects (e.g., construction lifting), elevating a platform, transporting items (e.g., freight), displaying items (e.g., advertisement), transporting humans (e.g., passenger carriage and/or tourism), and/or providing recreation.
Exemplary applications for disclosed airship 10 may include transporting equipment and/or supplies, such as construction equipment or budding components. For example, airship 10 may be used to transport oil pipeline construction equipment, as well as the piping itself. Airship 10 may be applicable for use in connection with building, operating, and/or maintaining pipelines, as well as logging and transportation of timber. Such applications may have particular use in remote areas, e.g., without transportation infrastructure, such as roads or airstrips, e.g., in Alaska, Canada, the Australian outback, the middle east, Africa, etc. Exemplary such areas may include tundra, desert, glaciers, snow and/or ice-covered land bodies, etc.
Another exemplary use of airship 10 may include crop dusting. Embodiments of airship 10 having engine configurations as disclosed herein may be capable of high levels of accuracy with respect to delivery of crop treatments. Advantages of such high accuracy may include the ability to dust crops in one plot of land without resulting in drift of sprayed chemicals onto neighboring plots. This may be advantageous when nearby plots include differing types of crops and/or if the nearby plots are, for example, maintained as organic.
In some embodiments, airship 10 may be configured to perform functions wherein the airship remains in substantially stationary flight. For example, airship 10 may be configured to perform a function including at least one of assembly of a structure, conducting cellular communications, conducting satellite communications, conducting surveillance, advertising, conducting scientific studies, and providing disaster support services. Airship 10 may include a platform or other cargo carrying structure configured to suspend communications equipment (e.g., satellite relay/receiver, cell tower, etc.) over a particular location. Because airship 10 may utilize, for example, associated control surfaces, propulsion assemblies 31, and its shape to remain suspended and substantially stationary over a given location, airship 10 may operate as a communications outpost in desired areas. Further, airship 10 may be employed for military or other reconnaissance/surveillance operations (e.g., for border patrol).
Operation of airship 10 may be performed by remotely controlling and/or utilizing manned flights of airship 10. Alternatively, or additionally, airship 10 may be operated by preprogrammed automated controls, particularly for applications involving stationary flight.
In some embodiments, airship 10 may be configured to fly at altitudes of 30,000 feet or more. Capability of flying at such altitudes may facilitate various aforementioned operations, such as surveillance, communications, scientific studies, etc. In addition, high altitude flight such as this may enable airship 10 to take advantage of jet streams, and also fly above adverse weather conditions and/or turbulence that may otherwise be present at lower altitudes. In addition, flying at high altitudes, above clouds, may expose solar panel 1010 to more sunlight. Further, at higher altitudes, sunlight may be more intense, further enhancing collection of solar energy.
In some embodiments, airship 10 may be configured for use at extreme high altitudes, e.g. as a replacement for satellites. Such embodiments of airship 10 may be configured for stationary or mobile flight at altitudes of more than 60,000 feet. Certain embodiments may be capable of normal operation at altitudes of more than 100,000 feet.
In some contemplated applications, airship 10 may be flown using solar energy during daylight hours and batteries at night and/or while flying beneath cloud cover. During flight in which airship 10 may be flown completely using solar energy, airship 10 may store any excess solar energy collected by using it to charge batteries 1030.
Certain embodiments of airship 10 disclosed herein may be equipped for water landing. Such embodiments may be applicable for landing in water of any depth. Therefore, airship 10 may be configured to land on a lake or ocean, airship 10 may also be configured to land on a swamp or other marshy site. Such airships may be used for applications at, or on, the water site. In addition, such airships may use the body of water/swamp as a landing site in an area that otherwise does not provide a landing place. For example, in order to travel to a heavily wooded area that does not provide a suitable landing site, an airship configured for water landing may land, for example, on a pond near the heavily wooded area. Airships equipped for water landing may be used, for example, to conduct research on a body of water, to perform construction, or to merely deliver materials and/or people to a location.
Some disclosed embodiments of airship 10 may include at least one deployable apparatus. As noted above, the deployable apparatus may be any of a number of different types of equipment. Airship 10 may be configured to implement the use of such equipment.
Whether configured for manned, un-manned, and/or automated flight, airship 10 may, according to some embodiments, be controlled by a computer 600. For example, propulsion assemblies 31 and control surfaces, among other things, may be controlled by a computer 600.
In this exemplary embodiment, disk 610, input device 615, MFD 620, optional external device 625, and interface 630 are connected to processor 605 via I/O unit 655. Further, disk 610 may contain a portion of information that may be processed by processor 605 and displayed on MFD 620. Input device 615 includes the mechanism by which a user and/or system associated with airship 10 may access computer 600. Optional external device 625 may allow computer 600 to manipulate other devices via control signals. For example, a fly-by-wire or fly-by-light system may be included allowing control signals to be sent to optional external devices, including, for example, servo motors associated with propulsion unit mounts 430 and control surfaces associated with horizontal and vertical stabilizing member 310 and 315. “Control signals,” as used herein, may mean any analog, digital, and/or signals in other formats configured to cause operation of an element related to control of airship 10 (e.g., a signal configured to cause operation of one or more control surfaces associated with airship 10). “Fly-by-wire,” as used herein, means a control system wherein control signals may be passed in electronic form over an electrically conductive material (e.g., copper wire). Such a system may include a computer 600 between the operator controls and the final control actuator or surface, which may modify the inputs of the operator in accordance with predefined software programs, “Fly-by-light,” as used herein, means a control system where control signals are transmitted similarly to fly-by-wire (i.e., including a computer 600), but wherein the control signals may transmitted via light over a light conducting material (e.g., fiber optics).
According to some embodiments, interface 630 may allow computer 600 to send and/or receive information other than by input device 615. For example, computer 600 may receive signals indicative of control information from flight controls 720, a remote control, and/or any other suitable device. Computer 600 may then process such commands and transmit appropriate control signals accordingly to various systems associated with airship 10 (e.g., propulsion system 30, vertical and horizontal control surfaces 350 and 360, etc.). Computer 600 may also receive weather and/or ambient condition information from sensors associated with airship 10 (e.g., altimeters, navigation radios, pitot tubes, etc.) and utilize such information for generating control signals associated with operating airship 10 (e.g., signals related to trim, yaw, and/or other adjustments).
According to some embodiments, computer 600 may include software and/or systems enabling other functionality. For example, computer 600 may include software allowing for automatic pilot control of airship 10. Automatic pilot control may include any functions configured to automatically maintain a preset course and/or perform other navigation functions independent of an operator of airship 10 (e.g., stabilizing airship 10, preventing undesirable maneuvers, automatic landing, etc.). For example, computer 600 may receive information from an operator of airship 10 including a flight plan and/or destination information. Computer 600 may use such information in conjunction with autopilot software for determining appropriate commands to propulsion units and control surfaces for purposes of navigating airship 10 according to the information provided. Other components or devices may also be attached to processor 605 via I/O unit 655. According to some embodiments, no computer may be used, or other computers may be used for redundancy. These configurations are merely exemplary, and other implementations will fall within the scope of the present disclosure.
According to some embodiments, it may be desirable for computer 600 to transmit in-flight signals configured to, for example, correct course heading and/or assist in stabilizing airship 10 independent of an operator of airship 10. For example, computer 600 may calculate, based on inputs from various sensors (e.g., altimeter, pitot tubes anemometers, etc.), a wind speed and direction associated with ambient conditions surrounding airship 10. Based on such information, computer 600 may determine a set of operational parameters that may maintain stability of airship 10. Such parameters may include, for example, propulsion unit parameters, control surface parameters, ballast parameters, etc. Computer 600 may then transmit commands consistent with such parameters assisting in maintaining stability and/or control of airship 10. For example, computer 600 may determine that as airship 10 gains altitude, the ballonet should be pressurized to prevent over-pressurization of first envelope 282. In such a situation, computer 600 may cause air pumps to activate, thereby pressurizing the ballonet to a desirable pressure. It should be noted that data associated with wind and other various effects on airship 10 (e.g., aerodynamic stresses) may be determined empirically and/or experimentally, and stored within computer 600. This may allow computer 600 to perform various actions consistent with safely navigating airship 10.
As noted above, according to some embodiments, once aloft, it may be desired to hold airship 10 substantially stationary over a desired area and at a desired altitude. For example, computer 600 and/or an operator may transmit control signals to propulsion system 30, vertical and horizontal control surfaces 350 and 360, the ballonet, and/or other systems associated with airship 10, such that airship 10 remains substantially stationary even where wind currents may cause airship 10 to be exposed to aerodynamic forces.
Although, for purposes of this disclosure, certain disclosed features are shown in some figures but not in others, it is contemplated that, to the extent possible, the various features disclosed herein may be implemented by each of the disclosed, exemplary embodiments. Accordingly, differing features disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as being mutually exclusive to different embodiments unless explicitly specified herein or such mutual exclusivity is readily understood, by one of ordinary skill in the art, to be inherent in view of the nature of the given features.
While the presently disclosed device and method have been described with reference to the specific embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the scope of the disclosure. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation, material, composition of matter, process, process step, or steps to the objective, spirit, and scope of the present invention. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only.
This is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/058,410, filed Oct. 21, 2013, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/430,010, filed on Mar. 26, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,596,571), which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/470,025 filed Mar. 31, 2011, entitled “AIRSHIP INCLUDING AERODYNAMIC, FLOATATION, AND DEPLOYABLE STRUCTURES,” the entire content of all the above-referenced applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1027590 | Bucher | May 1912 | A |
1350211 | Corson, Jr. | Aug 1920 | A |
1685458 | Lidback | Sep 1928 | A |
1944467 | Sabin | Jan 1934 | A |
2286014 | Rowe | Jun 1942 | A |
2365827 | Liebert | Dec 1944 | A |
2379355 | Hodgdon | Jun 1945 | A |
2563263 | Nicholl | Aug 1951 | A |
2935275 | Grayson | May 1960 | A |
3176937 | Labrecque | Apr 1965 | A |
3321158 | Di Stasi | May 1967 | A |
3337845 | Hart | Aug 1967 | A |
3395877 | McFadden et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3432120 | Guerrero | Mar 1969 | A |
D213731 | Hsi | Apr 1969 | S |
3467343 | Violleau | Sep 1969 | A |
3477168 | Trodglen, Jr. | Nov 1969 | A |
3529283 | Emerson et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3580636 | Setto | May 1971 | A |
3706433 | Sonstegaard | Dec 1972 | A |
3820744 | Denton | Jun 1974 | A |
RE28454 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Jun 1975 | E |
3946364 | Codomo et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3970270 | Pittet, Jr. | Jul 1976 | A |
3971533 | Slater | Jul 1976 | A |
3976265 | Doolittle | Aug 1976 | A |
4085912 | Slater | Apr 1978 | A |
4269375 | Hickey | May 1981 | A |
4298175 | Earl | Nov 1981 | A |
4326681 | Eshoo | Apr 1982 | A |
4461436 | Messina | Jul 1984 | A |
D274999 | Reeves | Aug 1984 | S |
D280194 | Bothe | Aug 1985 | S |
4583094 | Mosier | Apr 1986 | A |
4685640 | Warrington et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
D305418 | Blake | Jan 1990 | S |
4901948 | Panos | Feb 1990 | A |
D307131 | Kramer | Apr 1990 | S |
4914976 | Wyllie | Apr 1990 | A |
D307884 | Ninkovich | May 1990 | S |
D309887 | Ninkovich | Aug 1990 | S |
5096141 | Schley | Mar 1992 | A |
5170963 | Beck, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5240206 | Omiya | Aug 1993 | A |
5281960 | Dwyer | Jan 1994 | A |
5348251 | Ferguson | Sep 1994 | A |
5351911 | Neumayr | Oct 1994 | A |
5368256 | Kalisz et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5516060 | McDonnell | May 1996 | A |
5614897 | Durnford | Mar 1997 | A |
5675327 | Coirier et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5755402 | Henry | May 1998 | A |
5823468 | Bothe | Oct 1998 | A |
5906335 | Thompson | May 1999 | A |
D418804 | Glasgow et al. | Jan 2000 | S |
6010093 | Paulson | Jan 2000 | A |
6019312 | Blenn | Feb 2000 | A |
D424508 | Hankinson et al. | May 2000 | S |
6164589 | Kallsz | Dec 2000 | A |
6196498 | Eichstedt et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6231007 | Schafer | May 2001 | B1 |
6286783 | Kuenkler | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302357 | Kalisz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311925 | Rist | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315242 | Eichstedt et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328257 | Schafer | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6439508 | Taylor | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6549179 | Youngquist et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6565037 | Tonkovich | May 2003 | B1 |
6577929 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6648272 | Kothmann | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6659838 | Anderson | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6702229 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6880783 | Munk | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885313 | Selk et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6892118 | Feyereisen | May 2005 | B1 |
6966523 | Colting | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7040572 | Munk | May 2006 | B2 |
7055777 | Colting | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7108228 | Marshall | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7137592 | Barocela et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7156342 | Heaven, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7159817 | VanderMey et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7216069 | Hett | May 2007 | B2 |
D583294 | Balaskovic | Dec 2008 | S |
7825830 | Joyner | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7866601 | Balaskovic | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8177161 | Morehead et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8286909 | Lee | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8286910 | Alavi | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8336810 | Brutoco | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8342442 | Dancila | Jan 2013 | B1 |
20010002686 | Yokomaku et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020003189 | Kuenkler | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020109045 | Beach et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030001044 | Munk | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023355 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030127557 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030234320 | Colting | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040162000 | Anderson | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050277359 | Anderson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060016930 | Pak | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060060695 | Walden et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060065777 | Walden et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060151666 | VanderMey et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060227013 | Harvison et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060261213 | Lavan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060284002 | Stephens et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070034740 | Li | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070075184 | Marimon et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070295859 | Colvin | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080087762 | Holloman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080179454 | Balaskovic | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090109064 | Joyner | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090189012 | Liggett | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090200416 | Lee | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090321557 | Colting | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100044506 | Smith | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100067118 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076628 | Boorman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100102164 | Brutoco | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100252687 | Hogan | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100276546 | Im | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100320314 | Balaskovic | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110051041 | Yashiro | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110163200 | Balaskovic | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110174922 | Berman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120018571 | Goelet | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120199693 | Regas | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120212228 | Cho et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140231580 | Goelet | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1054124 | May 1979 | CA |
210003 | May 1909 | DE |
26 40 433 | Apr 1977 | DE |
3508101 | Sep 1986 | DE |
10011319 | Sep 2001 | DE |
20116152 | Feb 2002 | DE |
10058072 | Jun 2002 | DE |
20204023 | Jul 2002 | DE |
10120232 | Oct 2002 | DE |
10121854 | Nov 2002 | DE |
10139877 | Feb 2003 | DE |
10143589 | Apr 2003 | DE |
10148590 | Apr 2003 | DE |
10201133 | Jul 2003 | DE |
10210541 | Sep 2003 | DE |
10210542 | Sep 2003 | DE |
10216480 | Oct 2003 | DE |
10226868 | Dec 2003 | DE |
10228048 | Jan 2004 | DE |
10252695 | May 2004 | DE |
10252896 | May 2004 | DE |
10252908 | May 2004 | DE |
10252909 | May 2004 | DE |
10252910 | May 2004 | DE |
10252911 | May 2004 | DE |
10 2005 013529 | Jun 2007 | DE |
0 095 763 | Dec 1983 | EP |
0 282 425 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0 291 355 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0 503 801 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 619 792 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 714 362 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 729 423 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0 745 045 | Dec 1996 | EP |
1 070 008 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 160 156 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1 292 474 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1 294 608 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1 451 063 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 529 726 | May 2005 | EP |
1 770 009 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2 630 397 | Oct 1989 | FR |
2830838 | Apr 2003 | FR |
2 055 728 | Mar 1981 | GB |
2 197 276 | May 1988 | GB |
2 250 007 | May 1992 | GB |
2 275 036 | Aug 1994 | GB |
2 278 815 | Dec 1994 | GB |
2 300 010 | Oct 1996 | GB |
2 359 534 | Aug 2001 | GB |
2 366 274 | Mar 2002 | GB |
52 145999 | Dec 1977 | JP |
37568 | Oct 1993 | RU |
2009073 | Mar 1994 | RU |
40822 | Jan 1995 | RU |
2028249 | Feb 1995 | RU |
2070136 | Dec 1996 | RU |
2092381 | Oct 1997 | RU |
2098318 | Dec 1997 | RU |
2111146 | May 1998 | RU |
2111147 D1 | May 1998 | RU |
20114027 | Jun 1998 | RU |
2141911 | Nov 1999 | RU |
2196703 | Jan 2003 | RU |
2249536 | Apr 2005 | RU |
2250122 | Apr 2005 | RU |
1799335 | Feb 1993 | SU |
10870 | Dec 1996 | UA |
32397 | Dec 2000 | UA |
55928 | Apr 2003 | UA |
WO 9206002 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO 9313979 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9324364 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 9505307 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9514607 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9522486 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9527652 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9532893 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9532894 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9638340 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9715492 | May 1997 | WO |
WO-9749606 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9828188 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9829303 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9831589 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9967131 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0048902 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0073142 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0142082 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0168447 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0194172 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 03021291 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03047967 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03055745 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03055746 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03074356 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03097450 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 03097451 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004000642 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004074091 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004087499 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005002960 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005007508 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2006061617 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006085919 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006137880 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007036038 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007037932 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007045091 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007065649 | Jun 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
21st Century Airships Web Site, accessed Jun. 22, 2007, http://www.21stcenturyairships.com (1 page). |
ALA-40 proof-of-concept—Thermoplane, Photos from “Janes—All the World's Aircraft,” 1997 (2 pages). |
Ben lonnatta, “Spy Blimps and Heavy Lifters: The Latest Thing in Airships,” Air & Space Smithsonian, Sep. 2007, (2 pages). |
Blimp Europs N2A Web Site, accessed Oct. 11, 2006, machine translated Jun. 25, 2007, http://www.blimp-n2a.com/cl5alpha.htm (3 pages). |
CargoLifter Web Site, accessed Jun. 19, 2007, http://cargolifter.info (2 pages). |
Daniel P. Raymer, “Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach,” 4th Ed., 2006, pp. 652-659, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Reston, Virginia (11 pages). |
Demonstrator Alpha, Lenticular Aircraft of Air Photoraphy, accessed Oct. 11, 2006, machine translated Jun. 25, 2007, http://perso.orange.fr/balaskovic/actu-texte.html (2 pages). |
Dynalifter Web Site, accessed Jun. 22, 2007, http://www.dynalifter.com (7 pages). |
“Lift Equations.” derived from “The Non-Rigid Airstrip Test and Evaluation Manual,” U.S. Navy, 1940 (2 pages). |
Michael A. Dornhelm, “Skunks Working,” Aviation Week, Feb. 6, 2006, accessed Jun. 22, 2007, http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story—generic.jsp?channel=awst&id=news/020606p2.xml (2 pages). |
Gabriel A. Khoury and J. David Gillett, “Lenticular Mathematics,” an excerpt from “Airship Technology,” Cambridge University Press, 1999 (6 pages). |
Lord Ventry and Eugene Kolesnik, Excerpt from “Jane's Pocket Book of Airships,” Collier Books, 1977, pp. 94-96. |
Edwin Mowforth, “lenticular history,” an excerpt from “An Introduction to the Airship,” Second Edition. 2001, (6 pages). |
Operation-LTA Web Site, accessed Oct. 11, 2006, http://web.archive.org/web/20040405173243/www.operation-lta.com (5 pages). |
Stepharie Doncieux and Jean-Arcady Meyer, “Evolving Neural Networks for the Control of a Lenticular Blimp,” AnimatLab—LIP6. 2003 France, http://animatlab.lip6.fr (12 pages). |
Thomas F. Norton, “Now There's a ‘Personal Blimp:’ Unique Foldable Frame Makes it Practical as a Second Century Aircraft,” General Aviation News, Jan. 19, 2007, p. 18-19, 59th year, No. 2, Flyer Media, Inc., Lakewood, WA (2 pages). |
Worldwide Aeros Corporation Web Site, accessed Jun. 22, 2007, http://www.aerosml.com (4 pages). |
Yu. Boiko and V.A. Turian, “Dreamboat of Centuries,” Moscow, Machine Buuilding, p. 52, Jun. 13, 1991 (2 pages). |
U.S. Army Advanced Materiel Concepts Agency, “Aerial Very Heavy Lift Concepts for the 1990 Army vol. I”, Basic Report, Nov. 1969 (41 pages). |
U.S. Army Advanced Materiel Concepts Agency, “Aerial Very Heavy Lift Concepts for the 1990 Army vol. III,” Academic and Industrial Presentations, Nov. 1, 1969 (200 pages). |
Boeing Vertol Company for NASA Ames., “Feasibility Study of Modern Airships”, Final Report, vol. 1, May 1975 (478 pages). |
P.A. Mackrodt, “Further Studies in the Concept of Delta-Winged Hybrid Airships”, J. Aircraft, Oct. 1, 1980, pp. 734-740. |
Mark D. Ardema, “Missions and Vehicle Concepts for Modern, Propelled, Lighter-Than-Air Vehicles”, Agard. Nato, Feb. 1985 (50 pages). |
Dr. R.S. Ross et al., “New Air Transport for Heavy Bulky Cargo” (Advanced Copy), Apr. 20, 1962 (35 pages). |
W.L. Marcy, “Parametric Design Study of Fully-Buoyant Naval Air Vehicles”, NADC, Nov. 30, 1976 (85 pages). |
Stepier, Richard M., “Return to Lighter Than Air Transportation for Military and Civilian Application”, Defense Systems Management School, Fort Belvoir, VA, Nov. 1973 (56 pages). |
“Types of Ligher-Than-Air Aircraft,” Author unknown, Publication date unknown (34 pages). |
Mark D. Ardema, “Vehicle Concepts and Technology Requirements for Buoyant Heavy-Lift Systems”, NASA, 1979 (36 pages). |
Mark D. Ardema, “Vehicle Concepts and Technology Requirements for Bouyant Heavy-Lift Systems”, NASA Technical Paper, 1981 (18 pages). |
David Bailey and William Mueller, “North Warning Airship Program, Final Overview,” Naval Air Development Center, Apr. 6, 1987 (223 pages). |
“Preliminary Design Investigation for Payload and Ground Handling Concepts for Airships Operating in Remote Arctic Regions, Final Report,” Naval Air Development Center, Mar. 31, 1986 (224 pages). |
Capt. J. Arvi et al., “North Warning Program Airship Feasibility Tests, Final Report,” Naval Air Development Center, Feb. 20, 1987 (41 pages). |
Capt. J. Arvi et al., “North Warning System Familliarisation, Feasibility and Operational Demonstration, Final Report,” Naval Air Development Center, Apr. 19, 1986 (126 pages). |
Douglas Botting, “The Giant Airships,” Time-Life Books, Alexandria, VA 1980 (186 pages). |
E. Udartsev and E. Tyan, “Dirigible of a New Generation in Kiev”, available at http://www.aviajournal.com/sections/journal/arh/magazine/200112/index.html. 2001 (9 pages). |
Edwin Mowforth, “An Introduction to the Airship,” Third Edition, The Airship Association, Sep. 2007 (158 pages). |
PCT report of partial international search regarding PCT/US2007/021962, Dec. 2, 2008. |
Construction Cost Management Co., “With Us, Future Comes Faster,” available at http://www.buildcostcontrol.com/Airship/tabld/640/Default.aspx, (1 page). |
Future Flight?. Leslie Deane, Ballooning, The Journal of the Balloon Federation of America, Jul./Aug. 2008, pp. 26-32. |
PCT Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search re PCT/US2008/009453, mailed Feb. 4, 2009. |
Repoulias et al., “Dynamically Feasible Trajectory and Open-Loop Control Design for Unmanned Airships,” 2007 Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Jul. 27, 2007, XP002511581, Athens, Greece. |
Nagabhushan et al., “Directional control of an advanced airship,” AIAA Lighter-Than-Air Systems Technology Conference, 11th, Clearwater Beach, FL, May 15-18, 1995, Technical Papers (A95-30317 07-01), Washington, DC, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, May 15, 1995, pp. 107-116. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion re PCT/US2008/009453, mailed Apr. 3, 2009. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion re PCT/US2007/021962, mailed Apr. 3, 2009. |
http://dynalifter.com/, accessed Dec. 1, 2009 (23 pages). |
http://www.hybridairvehicles.net/index.html, accessed Dec. 1, 2009 (16 pages). |
http://www.skylifter.com.au/, accessed Dec. 1, 2009 (17 pages). |
Luffman, “Aeroraft the Alternative Aircraft for Heavy Lift Transport or Crane Use,” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA's 3rd Annual Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Tech, Nov. 17-19, 2003, Denver, Colorado, AIAA 2003-6754, pp. 1-13. |
Ahmed Ghanmi and Abderrahmane Sokri, “Airships for military logistics heavy lift: A performance assessment for Northern operation applications,” Defence R&D Canada—CORA, Technical Memorandum, Jan. 2010 (63 pages). |
European Examination Report from EP Application No. 08 827 387.5-1254, Jun. 1, 2010. (4 pages). |
European Examination Report from EP Application No. 07 673 610.1-2422, dated Aug. 16, 2010. (4 pages). |
Office Action dated Sep. 3, 2009, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/907,883. (16 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2010, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/907,883, (13 pages). |
Advisory Action dated Aug. 3, 2010, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/907,883. (3 pages). |
Amendment After Final dated Aug. 17, 2010, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/907,883. (28 pages). |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 1, 2010, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/907,883. (4 pages). |
L. Balls Crema et al., “Some Trends in Airship Technology Developments,” NATO, Apr. 10-15, 1983 (14 pages). |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion mailed on Oct. 8, 2012 in counterpart International Application No. PCT/US2012/030562, 24 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160355248 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61470025 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14058410 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 15242223 | US | |
Parent | 13430010 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14058410 | US |