The present invention pertains generally to load containment devices. More particularly, the present invention pertains to cargo containers that will resist the blast effect of an explosive detonation inside the cargo container. The present invention is particularly, but not exclusively, useful for containing luggage and other cargo during transport by aircraft.
Aircraft are attractive targets for political terrorists. Specifically, terrorists have placed bombs aboard aircraft to murder passengers and crewmembers that are also aboard the aircraft, and to cause further damage to persons and structures on the ground. This form of terrorist act often provokes an intense public reaction that has a substantial political impact.
Despite the use of extremely tight security procedures and sophisticated explosive detecting equipment, terrorists have still been able to place bombs aboard aircraft. One method used by terrorists to place a bomb aboard an aircraft is to hide the bomb in a passenger's luggage or in other items that are stored and carried in the cargo compartment of the aircraft. Terrorists have been able to use this method because small bombs cannot be easily detected through ordinary screening methods. One approach to solving this problem is to institute elaborate and intrusive screening methods. Another way to deal with this problem is to mitigate the potential damage that could be caused by a small bomb detonating aboard the aircraft.
In the airline industry, it is a standard practice to place cargo into a containment device, which is commonly referred to as Unit Load Devices (ULDs). The shape, size and weight of a ULD for a given type aircraft has been fairly well standardized due to practical considerations and regulatory requirements. Consequently, a typical ULD is in the shape of a box having sloped surfaces that conform the ULD to the aircraft's fuselage when the ULD is placed in the aircraft's cargo compartment. The ULD is often made of several panels, which are joined together at their edges to surround a cargo hold. Additionally, the ULD has an opening to provide access to the cargo hold, and a door for covering the opening. Cargo is placed into, or removed from, the cargo hold through the opening.
A ULD designed to withstand an explosive blast in the cargo hold should also conform to these practical considerations and regulatory requirements. Additionally, a blast resistant ULD may include other structures, or be formed from particular materials, to resist an explosive blast. For example, the panels in a blast resistant ULD may be structured to resist tensile stresses that are directed toward the plane of the panel. In response to an internal explosion, these panels tend to bulge outwardly from the explosive source but are effective in resisting rupture.
Stress analysis performed on existing ULDs show that the highest tension stress concentrations caused by an explosive blast within the cargo hold will occur at the edges where the panels have been joined together and at the door around the opening. Consequently, more material is often added to ULDs at these points of highest tension stress concentration to better contain an internal explosion. This additional material, however, adds cost and additional weight to the ULD, and may reduce the size of the cargo hold.
In light of the above, it is an object of the present invention to provide a containment device that is able to resist an internal explosive blast without rupturing the device. Another object of the present invention is to provide a containment device that reduces tension stress concentrations caused by an internal explosive blast. Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a containment device that meets the regulatory standards for the use of such devices in air transport operations. Still another object of the present invention is to provide a containment device that allows relatively easy access to a cargo hold located inside the cargo container. Another object of the present invention is to provide a containment device that is easy to use, relatively easy to manufacture, and comparatively cost effective.
In accordance with the present invention, an explosion resistant containment device is provided for containing luggage and other cargo during air transport. The device includes a container formed by joining panels in a unitary construction to reduce tension stress concentrations on the container that may be caused by an explosive denotation in the cargo hold. Additionally, the container includes interior surfaces surrounding a cargo hold. The interior surfaces include a top surface and a bottom surface that are substantially parallel to each other, a back surface and a front surface that are substantially parallel to each other, and a left surface and a right surface that are substantially parallel to each other.
The container also includes an opening defined by an edge for providing access to the cargo hold. A flange extends inwardly from the edge of the opening to establish a seat between the flange and the portion of the container surrounding the opening. The flange is continuous with the portion of the container surrounding the opening and is part of the unitary construction of the container.
An internally retracting door for covering the opening includes a substantially flat door panel having a front side circumscribed by edges forming a border. The edges of the door panel are substantially perpendicular to the front side of the door panel. Additionally, the door includes a bite on the front side of the panel at the border, which extends away from the front side of the panel in a substantially perpendicular direction. A core formed in the bite may be either hollow or solid. The door is dimensioned so that the bite can be juxtaposed with the flange to cover the opening with the panel when the bite is positioned against the seat. Furthermore, the panel and the bite are constructed with a composite material having a high strength to weight ratio.
The door also includes one or more handles mounted to the front side of the panel, and may include one or more handles mounted to edges of the door. The handles can be used for moving the door while opening and closing the door. When the door is being opened, the door retracts into the interior of the container. When the door is being closed, the door is retrieved from the interior of the container and the bite is positioned against the seat to cover the opening with the door panel. Additionally, the flange and the bite each have a number of corresponding bolt holes that line up with each other when the bite is positioned against the seat. When the bite is positioned against the seat, a bolt may be inserted into each pair of corresponding bolt holes to hold the door over the opening.
As a result of an explosive detonation in the cargo hold, an explosive force is exerted against the door panel and the container. The explosive force is transferred from the door panel to the bite and subsequently to the container at the seat. Optionally, a seal may be affixed to the seat. If used, the seal will transfer the explosive force to the container at the seat. Additionally, the bite minimizes door warping that may be caused by the explosive force on the door.
When used, the seal establishes an air-tight lock between the bite and the container in response to an internal pressure in the cargo container. Specifically, an explosion in the cargo hold creates sufficient internal pressure in the interior of the cargo container to press the bite against the seal to form the airtight lock. When the container is sealed, gasses are prevented from escaping the cargo hold and gasses are also prevented from entering the cargo hold.
In one embodiment of the containment device, a top cradle is mounted to the top surface of the container and a bottom cradle is mounted to the bottom surface of the container. The door is positioned between the top cradle and the bottom cradle to guide the door while the door is being opened or closed. Additionally, the bottom cradle includes a plate for supporting the door.
In an alternate embodiment of the containment device, the door includes a right surface and a left surface that are substantially parallel to each other. Axels are mounted to the left and right edges of the door and rollers are mounted to the axels. Additionally, guide rails are mounted to the left and right sides of the container to guide the rollers while the door is being opened or closed.
The novel features of this invention, as well as the invention itself, both as to its structure and its operation, will be best understood from the accompanying drawings, taken in conjunction with the accompanying description, in which similar reference characters refer to similar parts, and in which:
Referring initially to
For purposes of the present invention, the opening 16 provides access to the cargo hold 17 for placing luggage and cargo into the container 15. The opening 16, which is preferably located in the front panel 26, is defined by an edge 30. A flange 32 surrounds the opening 16 and extends into the cargo hold 17 from the edge 30 of the opening 16. The flange 32 is substantially perpendicular to the front panel 26 and is formed to be continuous with the container 15 in a unitary construction. For purposes of the present invention, bolt holes 34 are formed through the flange 32 in a direction substantially parallel to the front panel 26 of the container 15. The bolt holes 34 are formed to accommodate corresponding bolts 36 that may be included in the containment device 14. Additionally, bolt brackets 38 are mounted to an exterior surface 40 of the front panel 26 near the bolt holes 34. Each bolt bracket 38 includes a bolt hole 39 (
As shown in
As shown in
More details of the door 41 are shown in
As shown in
When the door 41 is covering the opening 16, one end of the bolt 36, which preferably has a U-shape construction, is positioned into the bolt hole 34 of the flange 32 and into the bolt hole 62 of the bite 50. As shown in
Alternatively, the seal 66 may be absent from the front panel 26 of the container 15. In this situation, the bite 50 is pressed against the seat 70 and the door panel 42 is pressed against the end 68 of the flange 32 when the door 41 is covering the opening 16 and the bolts 36 are positioned in the bolt holes 34, 39 and 62. Preferably, a gap 72 exists between the bite 50 and the seat 70 and another gap 74 exists between the door panel 42 and the end 68 of the flange 32 when the bite 50 is pressed against the seat 70. Referring to
More details of the door 41 are shown in
Referring to
A containment device 14 in which the door 41 interacts with the container 15 in a substantially lateral direction is shown in
As shown in
A containment device 14 in which the door 41 interacts with the container 15 in a substantially upright direction is shown in
As shown in
Referring to
The guide rails 110a and 110b can be described in greater detail with reference to
For the operation of the containment device 14, the door 41 is retracted into the cargo hold 17 to uncover the opening 16, as shown in
Operation of a containment device 14 in which the door 41 interacts with the container 15 in a substantially lateral direction is best described with reference to
The operator then pushes the door 41 in a substantially lateral direction toward the left panel 22 until the top cradle 102 and the frame 100 of the bottom cradle 92 that are near the left bracket 84 restrict further movement of the door 41, as shown in
To close the door 41, the operator pulls on the door handle 48 or the optional side handle 64 to move the door 41 in a substantially lateral direction toward the right panel 24 of the container 15 until portions of the top cradle 102 and the frame 100 of the bottom cradle 92 that are near the right bracket 86 restrict further movement of the door 41. The operator then pulls on the door handle 48 to move the door 41 in a substantially lateral direction toward the front panel 26 of the container 15 until the bite 50 of the door 41 presses against the seal 66, as shown in
Operation of a containment device 14 in which the door 41 interacts with the container 15 in a substantially upright direction is best described with reference to
The operator then pushes the door 41 in a substantially upright direction toward the top panel 18 (
To close the door 41, the operator pulls on the door handles 48 or the optional side handle 64 in a substantially downward direction to move the door 41 toward the bottom panel 20 of the container 15 until the door 41 contacts the bottom panel 20. The operator then pulls on the door handles 48 to move the door 41 in a substantially lateral direction toward the front panel 26 of the container 15 until the bite 50 of the door 41 presses against the seal 66. If the seal 66 is absent, the bite 50 instead presses against the flange 32 or seat 70. In either case, the door panel 42 covers the opening 16, and the bolt holes 34 in the flange 32 are lined up to be coaxial with the holes 39 in the bite 50. The operator then places the bolts 36 into the respective bolt holes 34, 39 and 62 of the flange 32, bolt bracket 38 and bite 50 of the door 41.
Should an explosive detonation occur in the cargo hold 17, a resultant explosive force on the door panel 42 will be transferred to the bite 50 and cause the bite 50 to press against the seal 66 to form an airtight seal between the bite 50 and the container 15. It is important for the present invention that the bolts 36 not prevent the bite 50 from pressing against the seal 66 when the seal 66 is present. For example, the bolts 36 may be constructed to shear when an explosive force on the door panel 42 is transferred to the bite 50 and which forces the bite 50 against the seal 66 or the seat 70. It is also possible to form the bolt holes 62 of the bite 50 to have a larger size than is necessary to accommodate the bolts 36. In this situation, the bolts 36 will not shear but will move relative to the bolt holes 62 when the bite 50 is forced against the seal 66 or the seat 70.
When the bite 50 is pressed into the seal 66, the seal 66 prevents gasses from flowing into, or flowing out of, the cargo hold 17. For example, the seal 66 will prevent leakage of hazardous or toxic materials from the cargo hold 17, and will also prevent ambient air from entering the container 15, which may promote deflagration in the cargo hold 17. Additionally, the seal 66 transfers the explosive force from the bite 50 to the front panel 26 of the container 15 and uniformly distributes the explosive force to the container 15 at the seat 70. If the optional seal 66 is absent from the seat 70, the bite 50 instead transfers the explosive force from the door panel 42 to the container 15 and uniformly distributes the explosive force to the container 15 at the seat 70.
Whether or not the seal 66 is present, the bite 50 prevents the door 41 from warping as a result of the explosive blast while uniformly distributing the explosive force to the container 15. Furthermore, the bite 50 bonds tightly to the seat 70 in response to an explosive force in the cargo hold 17 to balance the in-plane tension stresses in all directions on the door panel 42. Because the container 15 is formed of a unitary construction, a concentration of tension stresses from the explosive force are reduced in the container 15. Accordingly, the door panel 42 and the container 15 will resist rupturing when subjected to tension stresses caused by the explosive blast.
While the particular blast resistant containment device and method as herein shown and disclosed in detail is fully capable of obtaining the objects and providing the advantages herein before stated, it is to be understood that it is merely illustrative of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention and that no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown other than as described in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
718878 | Reynolds et al. | Jan 1903 | A |
900696 | Baum | Oct 1908 | A |
1259153 | Standish | Mar 1918 | A |
2739730 | Jonas | Mar 1956 | A |
2884296 | Meilinger | Apr 1959 | A |
3180697 | Mulch | Apr 1965 | A |
3490824 | Bartlett et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3915327 | Lovich et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4187758 | Petty | Feb 1980 | A |
4216927 | Byrd | Aug 1980 | A |
4478350 | Ohlsson | Oct 1984 | A |
4542545 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4878415 | Foster et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4998634 | Nessfield | Mar 1991 | A |
5195701 | Willan | Mar 1993 | A |
5267665 | Sanai | Dec 1993 | A |
5312182 | Mlakar et al. | May 1994 | A |
5360129 | Lee | Nov 1994 | A |
5390580 | Gibbons, Jr. et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5413410 | Mlakar | May 1995 | A |
5435641 | Dumon Dupuis et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5595431 | Mlakar | Jan 1997 | A |
5599082 | Mlakar et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5645184 | Rowse et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5769257 | Fleisher et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6019237 | Durham et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
20010017508 | Caldwell et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
139537 | May 1985 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040123783 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |