Al-Ni-Mn casting alloy for automotive and aerospace structural components

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6783730
  • Patent Number
    6,783,730
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 20, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 31, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
There is claimed an Al—Ni—Mn based alloy for die casting, squeeze casting, permanent mold casting, sand casting and/or semi-solid metal forming. The composition of this alloy includes, by weight percent: about 2-6% Ni, about 1-3% Mn, less than about 1% Fe, less than about 1% Si, the balance Al, incidental elements and impurities. It is suitable for aerospace and automotive cast parts.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to the field of aluminum-based casting alloys. It further relates to automotive and aerospace parts made from such alloys.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Most aluminum casting alloys need to be solution heat treated, quenched, and artificially aged to achieve adequate properties for automotive and aerospace structural applications. The processes of solution heat treating and quenching not only increase operational and capital costs but also induce part distortion, which then requires adding a straightening step to the overall manufacturing process. That straightening step is time-consuming and a high cost operation that greatly limits the applications of cast Al alloys.




Recently, some non-heat treatable (or “NHT”) alloys were developed and implemented in production. Those alloys can be used in either an F-temper or T5 condition. Unfortunately, those alloys tend to have much less castability than alloys required in a T6-type temper.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention consists of an Al—Ni—Mn based alloy for die casting, squeeze casting, permanent mold casting, sand casting and/or semi-solid metal forming. Preferred embodiments of this alloy include the following compositional additions, all in weight percent; about 2-6% Ni, about 1-3% Mn, less than about 1% Fe, less than about 1% Si, the the balance Al, incidental elements and impurities. On a more preferred basis, this alloy composition consists essentially of about 3.5-4.5% Ni, about 1.5-2.5% Mn, less than about 0.1% Fe, less than about 0.1% Si, less than about 0.15% Ti, and less than about 0.03% B, the balance Al and incidentals.











DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




When referring to any numerical range of values herein, such ranges are understood to include each and every number and/or fraction between the stated range minimum and maximum. A range of about 0.5-6 wt. % nickel, for example, would expressly include all intermediate values of about 0.6, 0.7 and 0.9% Ni, all the way up to and including 5.95, 5.97 and 5.99 wt. % nickel. The same applies to each other numerical property and/or elemental range set forth herein.




The invention alloy decribed herein has the following benefits: (a) excellent castability including high fluidity and low hot cracking tendency, properties which are not found in other NHT Al alloys; and (b) good tensile properties without any heat treatments. The alloy composition of this invention eliminates the need for SHT, quench and aging processes, while also showing good fracture toughness in the as-cast condition.




Several alloy compositions were comparatively cast, using permanent mold castings, from which the following properties were measured:












TABLE 1











Mechanical Properties (Tensile), Hardness (HB) and Hot Cracking






Index (HCI) for Several Al-Ni-Mn Alloys in As-Cast Condition

















Samp





UTS




YS




%





HCI,






#




Composition




(Mpa)




(Mpa)




Elong




HB




mm




















1




Al-2Ni-2Mn-0.1Ti-0.02B




159




82




24




56




4






2




Al-2.5Ni-2Mn0.3Zr-0.3Cr




180




100




17




65




4






3




Al-4Ni-2Mn-0.1Ti-0.02B




208




129




16




62




<4














Another set of alloy compositions was comparatively cast and evaluated. The results of Kahn Tear tests performed thereon were as follows:












TABLE 2











Kahn Tear testing of Two Preferred Embodiments













Alloy




Composition




UPE (KJ/m2)
















1




Al-3.85 Ni-1.91 Mn-0.02 Ti-0.002B




90






2




Al-3.88 Ni-1.98 Mn-0.1 Ti-0.02B




115














From this table, it was concluded that lower titanium and/or boron contents had a negative impact on Kahn Tear properties.




The influence of nickel on hot cracking index (HCI) and mechanical properties of several individually cast compositions containing 2% Mn (as-cast) was then mapped for comparison. Also included were representative samples of cast alloy A356 (Aluminum Association designation).












TABLE 3











Ni content effect on Hot Cracking Index (HCI) and






Mechanical Properties (Tensile) and % Elongation














Before corrosion test




After corrosion test


















UTS




Elong




UTS




Elong






% Ni




HCI, mm




MPa




%




MPa




%



















0




12




98




36




101











0.5




4




121




 9
















1




4




146




13




141




16






2




4




170











4




4




201




 8




191




 7






A356.0




4




186









169




 6














From this table, it can be seen that a minimum of around 0.5 wt. % Ni is needed to achieve good castability (HCI=4 mm). In addition, this table showed that overall corrosion resistance does not appear to be significantly affected by total Ni content.




The role of ancillary elements on the mechanical properties (tensile testing) of Al—4Ni—2Mn alloy samples was next evaluated. For this comparison, all samples were machined from 22 mm diameter cast specimens.















TABLE 4













Before corrosion test




After corrosion test






















UTS,




TYS,




Elong.,




UTS,




YS,




Elong,






Alloy




Composition




##




MPa




MPa




%




MPa




MPa




%






















A356.0




7Si 0.3Mg




1




193




98




5.7




184




96




5.0








2 F temp




193




106




5.7




170




112




4.0








3 F temp




192




105




6.0




164




103




4.7








4 F temp




185




94




6.7




168




98




4.7








avg




191




101




6.0




172




102




4.6






A




2Ni2Mn0.1Ti(B)




1




157




82




20.0




148




79




17.0








2 F temp




154




81




20.7




151




84




22.7








3 F temp




152




79




24.3




154




83




20.7








4 F temp




153




79




20.7




152




84




19.7








avg




154




80




21.4




151




83




20.0






B




4Ni2Mn0.1Ti(B)




1




174




103




17.3




170




98




15.0








2 F temp




173




97




18.0




171




95




17.3








3 F temp




177




95




15.6




169




91




13.0








4 F temp




172




95




15.0




170




101




16.0








avg




174




98




16.5




170




96




15.3






C




2Ni2Mn0.1Ti(B) +




1




168




81




18.3




159




79




15.3







0.2Fe0.1Si








2 F temp




163




81




18.3




159




94




17.7








3 F temp




168




84




19.7




153




82




13.3








4 F temp




159




81




16.0




155




81




15.7








avg




165




82




18




157




84




16














From this data, it was observed that higher strengths can be achieved via higher Ni contents but that no significant change in overall corrosion resistance was found.












TABLE 5











Effect of Ancillary elements in 4% Ni, 2% Mn Invention alloys





























UPE











TYS




UTS




Elong




HCI




KJ/






Comp.




Fe




Si




Ti




B




MPa




MPa




%




mm




m2























A-1




<0.05




<0.05




0.0




0.0



















4







2




<0.05




<0.05




0.05




0.01



















4






3




<0.05




<0.05




0.1




0.02




99




199




16




4




80






4




<0.05




0.1




0.1




0.02




96




201




15




6




62






5




<0.05




0.3




0.1




0.02




96




209




13




6




46






6




<0.05




0.5




0.1




0.02




98




217




12




10




40






7




<0.05




0.7




0.1




0.02




93




181




5




14




34






8




<0.05




0.9




0.1




0.02




93




201




7




>16




32






B-1




0.1




<0.05




0.1




0.02




100




201




11




4






2




0.2




<0.05




0.1




0.02




94




193




15




<6






3




0.2




0.1




0.1




0.02







4






4




0.3




0.1




0.1




0.02







4






5




0.3




0.2




0.1




0.02







6






6




0.5




0.2




0.1




0.02







<6






7




0.7




0.2




0.1




0.02







6






8




0.9




0.2




0.1




0.02







10














From this data, it was interpreted that hot cracking tendencies (as evidenced by larger HCI values) tended to increase with increasing Si content. Hot cracking tendencies are relatively less sensitive to Fe contents, as compared to Si levels. Finally, the elongation and propagation energy values decrease with increasing Si content.




A more preferred alloy composition according to this invention consists essentially of: about 3.7-4.2 wt. % Ni, about 1.7-2.2 wt. % Mn, up to about 0.1 wt % Fe and up to about 0.1 wt. % Si, about 0.08-0.15 wt. % Ti, about 0.01-0.03 wt. % B, the balance aluminum.




Having described the presently preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention may be otherwise embodied within the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. An aluminum casting alloy composition that includes: about 2-6 wt % Ni, about 1-3 wt. % Mn, less than about 1 wt. % Fe, less than about 1 wt. % Si, with incidental elements and impurities.
  • 2. The alloy composition of claim 1 which contains about 3.5-4.5 wt. % Ni.
  • 3. The alloy composition of claim 2 which contains about 3.7-4.2 wt. % Ni.
  • 4. The alloy composition of claim 1 which contains about 1.5-2.5 wt. % Mn.
  • 5. The alloy composition of claim 4 which contains about 1.7-2.2 wt. % Mn.
  • 6. The alloy composition of claim 1 which contains less than about 0.3 wt. % Ti.
  • 7. The alloy composition of claim 1 which contains less than about 0.06 wt. % B.
  • 8. The alloy composition of claim 1 which contains up to about 0.25 wt % Fe.
  • 9. The alloy composition of claim 8 which contains up to about 0.1 wt % Fe.
  • 10. The alloy composition of claim 1 which contains up to about 0.25 wt. % Si.
  • 11. The alloy composition of claim 10 which contains up to about 0.1 wt. % Si.
  • 12. An aerospace structural component cast from an alloy composition that includes: about 2-6 wt. % Ni, about 1-3 wt. % Mn, less than about 1 wt. % Fe, less than about 1 wt. % Si, the balance aluminum, incidental elements and impurities.
  • 13. The aerospace component of claim 12 wherein said composition contains about 3.5-4.5 wt. % Ni, about 1.5-2.5 wt. % Mn, up to about 0.25 wt. % Fe, up to about 0.25 wt. % Si, about 0.08-0.15 w. % Ti, up to about 0.05 wt. % B, the balance aluminum, incidental elements and impurities.
  • 14. The aerospace component of claim 13 wherein said composition contains about 3.7-4.2 wt. % Ni, about 1.7-2.2 wt. % Mn, up to about 0.1 wt. % Fe, up to about 0.1 wt. % Si, about 0.08-0.15 wt. % Ti, about 0.01-0.03 wt. % B, the balance aluminum, incidental elements and impurities.
  • 15. An automotive structural component cast from an alloy composition that includes: about 2-6 wt. % Ni, about 1-3 wt. % Mn, less than about 1.0 wt. % Fe, less than about 1.0 wt. % Si, the balance aluminum, incidental elements and impurities.
  • 16. The automotive component of claim 15 wherein said composition contains about 3.5-4.5 wt. % Ni, about 1.5-2.5 wt. % Mn, up to about 0.25 wt. % Fe, up to about 0.25 wt. % Si, about 0.08-0.15 wt. % Ti, and up to about 0.05 wt. % B, the balance aluminum, incidental elements and impurities.
  • 17. The automotive component of claim 15 wherein said composition contains about 3.7-4.2 wt. % Ni, about 1.7-2.2 wt. % Mn, up to about 0.1 wt. % Fe, up to about 0.1 wt. % Si, about 0.08-0.15 wt. % Ti and about 0.01-0.03 wt. % B, the balance aluminum, incidental elements and impurities.
  • 18. The aerospace structural component of claim 12 wherein said composition contains less than about 0.3 wt. % Ti, and less than about 0.06 wt. % B.
  • 19. The automotive structural component of claim 15 wherein said composition contains less than about 0.3 wt. % Ti and less than about 0.06 wt. % B.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/345,182 filed on Dec. 21, 2001 and entitled “An Al—Ni—Mn Casting Alloy for Automotive and Aerospace Structural Components”, the disclosure of which is fully incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
6306342 Koch et al. Oct 2001 B2
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
“ASM Specialty Handbook: Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys”, ASM International, 1993, p. 41.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/345182 Dec 2001 US