Patent Grant
7666267
The invention relates to a wrought Al—Zn—Mg—Cu aluminium type (or 7000- or 7xxx-series aluminium alloys as designated by the Aluminum Association). More specifically, the present invention is related to an age-hardenable, high strength, high fracture toughness and highly corrosion resistant aluminium alloy and products made of that alloy. Products made from this alloy are very suitable for aerospace applications, but not limited to that. The alloy can be processed to various product forms, e.g. sheet, thin plate, thick plate, extruded or forged products.
In every product form, made from this alloy, property combinations can be achieved that are outperforming products made from nowadays known alloys. Because of the present invention, the uni-alloy concept can now be used also for aerospace applications. This will lead to significant cost reduction in the aerospace industry. Recycleability of the aluminium scrap produced during the production of the structural part or at the end of the life-cycle of the structural part will become significant easier because of the uni-alloy concept.
Different types of aluminium alloys have been used in the past for forming a variety of products for structural applications in the aerospace industry. Designers and manufacturers in the aerospace industry are constantly trying to improve fuel efficiency, product performance and constantly trying to reduce the manufacturing and service costs. The preferred method for achieving the improvements, together with the cost reduction, is the uni-alloy concept, i.e. one aluminium alloy that is capable of having improved property balance in the relevant product forms.
The alloy members and temper designations used herein are in accordance with the well-known aluminium alloy product standards of the Aluminum Association. All percentages are in weight percents, unless otherwise indicated.
State of the art at this moment is high damage tolerant AA2x24 (i.e. AA2524) or AA6x13 or AA7x75 for fuselage sheet, AA2324 or AA7x75 for lower wing, AA7055 or AA7449 for upper wing and AA7050 or AA7010 or AA7040 for wing spars and ribs or other sections machined from thick plate. The main reason for using different alloys for each different application is the difference in the property balance for optimum performance of the whole structural part.
For fuselage skin, damage tolerant properties under tensile loading are considered to be very important, that is a combination of fatigue crack growth rate (“FCGR”), plane stress fracture toughness and corrosion. Based on these property requirements, high damage tolerant AA2x24-T351 (see e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,213,639 or EP-1026270-A1) or Cu containing AA6xxx-T6 (see e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 4,589,932, U.S. Pat. No. 5,888,320, US-2002/0039664-A1 or EP-1143027-A1) would be the preferred choice of civilian aircraft manufacturers.
For lower wing skin a similar property balance is desired, but some toughness is allowably sacrificed for higher tensile strength. For this reason AA2x24 in the T39 or a T8x temper are considered to be logical choices (see e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,865,914, U.S. Pat. No. 5,593,516 or EP-1114877-A1), although AA7x75 in the same temper is sometimes also applied.
For upper wing, where compressive loading is more important than the tensile loading, the compressive strength, fatigue (SN-fatigue or life-time) and fracture toughness are the most critical properties. Currently, the preferred choice would be AA7150, AA7055, AA7449 or AA7x75 (see e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,221,377, 5,865,911, 5,560,789 or U.S. Pat. No. 5,312,498). These alloys have high compressive yield strength with at the moment acceptable corrosion resistance and fracture toughness, although aircraft designers would welcome improvements on these property combinations.
For thick sections having a thickness of more than 3 inch or parts machined from such thick sections, a uniform and reliable property balance through thickness is important. Currently, AA7050 or AA7010 or AA7040 (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,027,582) or C80A (see US-2002/0150498-A1) are used for these types of applications. Reduced quench sensitivity, that is deterioration of properties through thickness with lower quenching speed or thicker products, is a major wish from the aircraft manufactures. Especially the properties in the ST-direction are a major concern of the designers and manufactures of structural parts.
A better performance of the aircraft, i.e. reduced manufacturing cost and reduced operation cost, can be achieved by improving the property balance of the aluminium alloys used in the structural part and preferably using only one type of alloy to reduce the cost of the alloy and to reduce the cost in the recycling of aluminium scrap and waste.
Accordingly, it is believed that there is a demand for an aluminium alloy capable of achieving the improved proper property balance in every relevant product form.
The present invention is directed to an AA7xxx-series aluminium alloy having the capability of achieving a property balance in any relevant product that is better than property balance of the variety of commercial aluminium alloys (AA2xxx, AA6xxx, AA7xxx) nowadays used for those products.
A preferred composition of the alloy of the present invention comprises or consists essentially of, in weight %, about 6.5 to 9.5 zinc (Zn), about 1.2 to 2.2% magnesium (Mg), about 1.0 to 1.9% copper (Cu), about 0 to 0.5% zirconium (Zr), about 0 to 0.7% scandium (Sc), about 0 to 0.4% chromium (Cr), about 0 to 0.3% hafnium (Hf), about 0 to 0.4% titanium (Ti), about 0 to 0.8% manganese (Mn), the balance being aluminium (Al) and other incidental elements. Preferably (0.9Mg−0.6)≦Cu≦(0.9Mg+0.05).
A more preferred alloy composition according to the invention consists essentially of, in weight %, about 6.5 to 7.9% Zn, about 1.4 to 2.10% Mg, about 1.2 to 1.80% Cu, and preferably wherein (0.9Mg−0.5)≦Cu≦0.9Mg, about 0 to 0.5% Zr, about 0 to 0.7% Sc, about 0 to 0.4% Cr, about 0 to 0.3% Hf, about 0 to 0.4% Ti, about 0 to 0.8% Mn, the balance being Al and other incidental elements.
A more preferred alloy composition according to the invention consists essentially of, in weight %, about 6.5 to 7.9% Zn, about 1.4 to 1.95% Mg, about 1.2 to 1.75% Cu, and preferably wherein (0.9Mg−0.5)≦Cu≦(0.9Mg−0.1), about 0 to 0.5% Zr, about 0 to 0.7% Sc, about 0 to 0.4% Cr, about 0 to 0.3% Hf, about 0 to 0.4% Ti, about 0 to 0.8% Mn, the balance being aluminium and other incidental elements.
In a more preferred embodiment, the lower limit for the Zn-content is 6.7%, and more preferably 6.9%.
In a more preferred embodiment, the lower limit for the Mg-content of 1.90%, and more preferably 1.92%. This lower-limit for the Mg-content is in particular preferred when the alloy product is being used for sheet product, e.g. fuselage sheet, and when used for sections made from thick plate.
The above mentioned aluminium alloys may contain impurities or incidental or intentionally additions, such as for example at most 0.3% Fe, preferably at most 0.14% Fe, at most 0.2% silicon (Si), and preferably at most 0.12% Si, at most 1% silver (Ag), at most 1% germanium (Ge), at most 0.4% vanadium (V). The other additions are generally governed by the 0.05-0.15 weight % ranges as defined in the Aluminium Association, thus each unavoidable impurity in a range of <0.05%, and the total of impurities <0.15%.
The iron and silicon contents should be kept significantly low, for example not exceeding about 0.08% Fe and about 0.07% Si or less. In any event, it is conceivable that still slightly higher levels of both impurities, at most about 0.14% Fe and at most about 0.12% Si may be tolerated, though on a less preferred basis herein. In particular for the mould plates or tooling plates embodiments hereof, even higher levels of at most 0.3% Fe and at most 0.2% Si or less, are tolerable.
The dispersoid forming elements like for example Zr, Sc, Hf, Cr and Mn are added to control the grain structure and the quench sensitivity. The optimum levels of dispersoid formers do depend on the processing, but when one single chemistry of main elements (Zn, Cu and Mg) is chosen within the preferred window and that chemistry will be used for all relevant product forms, then Zr levels are preferably less than 0.11%.
A preferred maximum for the Zr level is a maximum of 0.15%. A suitable range of the Zr level is a range of 0.04 to 0.15%. A more preferred upper-limit for the Zr addition is 0.13%, and even more preferably not more than 0.11%.
The addition of Sc is preferably not more than 0.3%, and preferably not more than 0.18%. When combined with Sc, the sum of Sc+Zr should be less then 0.3%, preferably less than 0.2%, and more preferably at a maximum of 0.17%, in particular where the ratio of Zr and Sc is between 0.7 and 1.4.
Another dispersoid former that can be added, alone or with other dispersoid formers is Cr. Cr levels should be preferable below 0.3%, and more preferably at a maximum of 0.20%, and even more preferably 0.15%. When combined with Zr, the sum of Zr+Cr should not be above 0.20%, and preferably not more than 0.17%.
The preferred sum of Sc+Zr+Cr should not be above 0.4%, and more preferably not more than 0.27%.
Also Mn can be added alone or in combination with one of the other dispersoid formers. A preferred maximum for the Mn addition is 0.4%. A suitable range for the Mn addition is in the range of 0.05 to 0.40%, and preferably in the range of 0.05 to 0.30%, and even more preferably 0.12 to 0.30%. A preferred lower limit for the Mn addition is 0.12%, and more preferably 0.15%. When combined with Zr, the sum of Mn+Zr should be less then 0.4%, preferably less than 0.32%, and a suitable minimum is 0.14%.
In another embodiment of the aluminium alloy product according to the invention the alloy is free of Mn, in practical terms this would mean that the Mn-content is <0.02%, and preferably <0.01%, and more preferably the alloy is essentially free or substantially free from Mn. With “substantially free” and “essentially free” we mean that no purposeful addition of this alloying element was made to the composition, but that due to impurities and/or leaching from contact with manufacturing equipment, trace quantities of this element may, nevertheless, find their way into the final alloy product.
In a particular embodiment of the wrought alloy product according to this invention, the alloy consists essentially of, in weight percent:
In another particular embodiment of the wrought alloy product according to this invention, the alloy consists essentially of, in weight percent:
The alloy product according to the invention can be prepared by conventional melting and may be (direct chill, D.C.) cast into ingot form. Grain refiners such as titanium boride or titanium carbide may also be used. After scalping and possible homogenisation, the ingots are further processed by, for example extrusion or forging or hot rolling in one or more stages. This processing may be interrupted for an inter-anneal. Further processing may be cold working, which may be cold rolling or stretching. The product is solution heat treated and quenched by immersion in or spraying with cold water or fast cooling to a temperature lower than 95° C. The product can be further processed, for example by rolling or stretching, for example at most 8%, or may be stress relieved by stretching or compression at most about 8%, for example, from about 1 to 3%, and/or aged to a final or intermediate temper. The product may be shaped or machined to the final or intermediate structure, before or after the final ageing or even before solution heat treatment.
The design of commercial aircraft requires different sets of properties for different types of structural parts. An alloy when processed to various product forms (i.e., sheet, plate, thick plate, forging or extruded profile etc.) and to be used in a wide variety of structural parts with different loading sequences in service life and consequently meeting different material requirements for all those product forms, must be unprecedentedly versatile.
The important material properties for a fuselage sheet product are the damage tolerant properties under tensile loads (i.e. FCGR, fracture toughness and corrosion resistance).
The important material properties for a lower wing skin in a high capacity and commercial jet aircraft are similar to those for a fuselage sheet product, but typically a higher tensile strength is wished by the aircraft manufactures. Also fatigue life becomes a major material property.
Because the airplane flies at high altitude where it is cold, fracture toughness at minus 65° F. is a concern in new designs of commercial aircrafts. Additional desirable features include age formability whereby the material can be shaped during artificial aging, together with good corrosion performance in the areas of stress corrosion cracking resistance and exfoliation corrosion resistance.
The important material properties for an upper wing skin product are the properties under compressive loads, i.e. compressive yield strength, fatigue life and corrosion resistance.
The important material properties for machined parts from thick plate depend on the machined part. But, in general, the gradient in material properties through thickness must be very small and the material properties like strength, fracture toughness, fatigue and corrosion resistance must be a high level.
The present invention is directed at an alloy composition when processed to a variety of products, such as, but not limited to, sheet, plate, thick plate etc, will meet or exceed the desired material properties. The property balance of the product will out-perform the property balance of the product made from nowadays commercially used alloys.
It has been found very surprisingly a chemistry window within the AA7000 window, unexplored before, that does fulfil this unique capability.
The present invention resulted from an investigation on the effect of Cu, Mg and Zn levels, combined with various levels and types of dispersoid former (e.g. Zr, Cr, Sc, Mn) on the phases formed during processing. Some of these alloys were processed to sheet and plate and tested on tensile, Kahn-tear toughness and corrosion resistance. Interpretations of these results lead to the surprising insight that an aluminium alloy with a chemical composition within a certain window, will exhibit excellent properties as well as for sheet as for plate as for thick plate as for extrusions as for forgings.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a method of manufacturing the aluminium alloy product according to the invention. The method of manufacturing a high-strength, high-toughness AA7000-series alloy product having a good corrosion resistance, comprising the processing steps of:
The alloy products of the present invention are conventionally prepared by melting and may be direct chill (D.C.) cast into ingots or other suitable casting techniques. Homogenisation treatment is typically carried out in one or multi steps, each step having a temperature preferably in the range of 460 to 490° C. The pre-heat temperature involves heating the rolling ingot to the hot-mill entry temperature, which is typically in a temperature range of 400 to 460° C. Hot working the alloy product can be done by one or more methods selected from the group consisting of rolling, extruding and forging. For the present alloy hot rolling is being preferred. Solution heat treatment is typically carried out in the same temperature range as used for homogenisation, although the soaking times can be chosen somewhat shorter.
In an embodiment of the method according to the invention the artificial ageing step i.) comprises a first ageing step at a temperature in a range of 105° C. to 135° C. preferably for 2 to 20 hours, and a second ageing step at a temperature in a range of 135° C. to 210° C. preferably for 4 to 20 hours. In a further embodiment a third ageing step may be applied at a temperature in a range of 105° C. to 135° C. and preferably for 20 to 30 hours.
A surprisingly excellent property balance is being obtained in whatever thickness is produced. In the sheet thickness range of at most 1.5 inch the properties will be excellent for fuselage sheet, and preferably the thickness is at most 1 inch. In the thin plate thickness range of 0.7 to 3 inch the properties will be excellent for wing plate, e.g. lower wing plate. The thin plate thickness range can be used also for stringers or to form an integral wing panel and stringer for use in an aircraft wing structure. More peak-aged material will give an excellent upper wing plate, whereas slightly more over-ageing will give excellent properties for lower wing plate. When processed to thicker gauges of more than 2.5 inch up to about 11 inch or more excellent properties will be obtained for integral parts machined from plates, or to form an integral spar for use in an aircraft wing structure, or in the form of a rib for use in an aircraft wing structure. The thicker gauge products can be used also as tooling plate or mould plate, e.g. moulds for manufacturing formed plastic products, for example via die-casting or injection moulding. When thickness ranges are given hereinabove, it will be immediately apparent to the skilled person that this is the thickness of the thickest cross sectional point in the alloy product made from such a sheet, thin plate or thick plate. The alloy products according to the invention can also be provided in the form of a stepped extrusion or extruded spar for use in an aircraft structure, or in the form of a forged spar for use in an aircraft wing structure. Surprisingly, all these products with excellent properties can be obtained from one alloy with one single chemistry.
In the embodiment whereby structural components, e.g. ribs, are made from the alloy product according to the invention having a thickness of 2.5 inch or more, the component increased elongation compared to its AA7050 aluminium alloy counterpart. In particular the elongation (or A50) in the ST testing direction is 5% or more, and in the best results 5.5% or more.
Furthermore, in the embodiment whereby structural components are made from the alloy product according to the invention having a thickness of 2.5 inch or more, the component has a fracture toughness Kapp in the L-T testing direction at ambient room temperature and when measured at S/4 according to ASTM E561 using 16-inch centre cracked panels (M(T) or CC(T)) showing an at least 20% improvement compared to its AA7050 aluminium alloy counterpart, and in the best examples an improvement of 25% or more is found.
In the embodiment where the alloy product has been extruded, preferably the alloy products have been extruded into profiles having at their thickest cross sectional point a thickness in the range of up to 10 mm, and preferably in the range of 1 to 7 mm. However, in extruded form the alloy product can also replace thick plate material which is conventionally machined via high-speed machining or milling techniques into a shaped structural component. In this embodiment the extruded alloy product has preferably at its thickest cross sectional point a thickness in a range of 2 to 6 inches.
The ranges can also be identified by using the corner-points A, B, C, D, E, and F of a hexagon box. Preferred ranges are identified by A′ to F′, and more preferred ranges by A″ to F″. The coordinates are listed in Table 1. In
On a laboratory scale alloys were cast to prove the principle of the current invention and processed to 4.0 mm sheet or 30 mm plate. The alloy compositions are listed in Table 2, for all ingots Fe <0.06, Si <0.04, Ti 0.01, balance aluminium. Rolling blocks of approximately 80 by 80 by 100 mm (height×width×length) were sawn from round lab cast ingots of about 12 kg. The ingots were homogenised at 460±5° C. for about 12 hrs and consequently at 475±5° C. for about 24 hrs and consequently slowly air cooled to mimic an industrial homogenisation process. The rolling ingots were pre-heated for about 6 hrs at 410±5° C. At an intermediate thickness range of about 40 to 50 mm the blocks were re-heated at 410±5° C. Some blocks were hot rolled to the final gauge of 30 mm, others were hot rolled to a final gauge of 4.0 mm. During the whole hot-rolling process, care was taken to mimic an industrial scale hot rolling. The hot-rolled products were solution heat treated and quenched. Most were quenched in water, but some were also quenched in oil to mimic the mid and quarter-thickness quenching-rate of a 6-inch thick plate. The products were cold stretched by about 1.5% to relieve the residual stresses. The ageing behaviour of the alloys was investigated. The final products were over-aged to a near peak aged strength (e.g. T76 or T77 temper).
Tensile properties have been tested according EN10.002. The tensile specimens from the 4 mm thick sheet were flat EURO-NORM specimen with 4 mm thickness. The tensile specimens from the 30 mm plate were round tensile specimens taken from mid-thickness. The tensile test results in Table 1 are from the L-direction. The Kahn-tear toughness is tested according to ASTM B871-96. The test direction of the results on Table 2 is the T-L direction. The so-called notch-toughness can be obtained by dividing the tear-strength, obtained by the Kahn-tear test, by the tensile yield strength (“TS/Rp”). This typical result from the Kahn-tear test is known in the art to be a good indicator for true fracture toughness. The unit propagation energy (“UPE”), also obtained by the Kahn-tear test, is the energy needed for crack growth. It is believed that the higher the UPE, the more difficult to grow the crack, which is a desired feature of the material.
To qualify for a good corrosion performance, the exfoliation corrosion resistance (“EXCO”) when measured according to ASTM G34-97 must be at least “EA” or better. The inter-granular corrosion (“IGC”) when measured according MIL-H-6088 is preferable absent. Some pitting is acceptable, but preferably should be absent also.
In order to have a promising candidate alloy suitable for a variety of products, it had to fulfil the following requirements on lab-scale: A tensile yield strength of at least 510 MPa, an ultimate strength of at least 560 MPa, a notch toughness of at least 1.5 and a UPE of at least 200 kJ/m2. The results for the various alloys as function of some processing are listed in Table 2 also.
In order to meet all those desired material properties, the chemistry of the alloy has to be carefully balanced. According to the present results, too high values for Cu, Mg and Zn contents were found to be detrimental to toughness and corrosion resistance. Whereas too low values were found to be detrimental for high strength levels.
But, very surprisingly, a higher Zn-level is increasing the toughness and crack growth resistance. Therefore, it is desirable to use higher Zn level and combine these with lower Mg and Cu levels. It has been found that the Zn-content should not be below 6.5%, and preferably not below 6.7%, and more preferably not below 6.9%.
Mg is required to have acceptable strength levels. It has been found that a ratio of Mg/Zn of about 0.27 or lower seems to give the best strength-toughness combination. However, Mg levels should not exceed 2.2%, and preferably not exceed 2.1%, and even more preferably not exceed 1.97%, with a more preferred upper level of 1.95%. This upper-limit is lower than in the conventional AA-windows or ranges of presently used commercial aerospace alloys like AA7050, AA7010 and AA7075.
In order to have a desirably very high crack growth resistance (or UPE) Mg levels must be carefully balanced and should preferably be in the same order or slightly more than the Cu levels, and preferably (0.9×Mg−0.6)≦Cu≦(0.9×Mg+0.05). The Cu-content should not be too high. It has been found that the Cu-content should not be higher than 1.9%, and preferably should not exceed 1.80%, and more preferably not exceed 1.75%.
The dispersoid formers used in AA7xxx-series alloys are typically Cr, as in e.g. AA7x75, or Zr, as in e.g. AA7x50 and AA7x10. Conventionally, Mn is believed to be detrimental for toughness, but much to our surprise, a combination of Mn and Zr shows still a very good strength-toughness balance.
A batch of full-size rolling ingots with a thickness of 440 mm thick on an industrial scale were produced by a DC-casting and having the chemical composition (in wt. %): 7.43% Zn, 1.83% Mg, 1.48% Cu, 0.08% Zr, 0.02% Si and 0.04% Fe, balance aluminium and unavoidable impurities. One of these ingots was scalped, homogenised at 12 hrs/470° C.+24 hrs/475° C.+air cooled to ambient temperature. This ingot was pre-heated at 8 hrs/410° C. and then hot rolled to about 65 mm. The rolling block was then turned 90 degrees and further hot rolled to about 10 mm. Finally the rolling block was cold rolled to a gauge of 5.0 mm. The obtained sheet was solution heat treated at 475° C. for about 40 minutes, followed by water-spray quenching. The resultant sheets were stress relieved by a cold stretching operation of about 1.8%. Two ageing variants have been produced, variant A: for 5 hrs/120° C.+9 hrs/155° C., and variant B: for 5 hrs/120° C.+9 hrs/165° C.
The tensile results have been measured according to EN 10.002. The compression yield strength (“CYS”) has been measured according to ASTM E9-89a. The shear strength has been measured according to ASTM B831-93. The fracture toughness, Kapp, has been measured according to ASTM E561-98 on 16-inch wide centre cracked panels [M(T) or CC(T)]. The Kapp has been measured at ambient room temperature (RT) and at −65° F. As reference material a high damage tolerant (“HDT”) AA2x24-T351 has been tested as well. The results are listed in Table 3.
The exfoliation corrosion resistance has been measured according ASTM G34-97. Both variant A and B showed EA rating.
The inter-granular corrosion measured according to MIL-H-6088 for variant A was about 70 μm and for variant B about 45 μm. Both are significantly lower than the typical 200 μm as measured for the reference AA2x24-T351.
From Table 3 it can be seen that there is a significant improvement with the alloy according to the invention. A significant increase in strength at comparable or even higher fracture toughness levels. Also the alloy according to the invention at a low temperature of minus 65° F., outperforms the nowadays standard high damage tolerant fuselage alloy AA2x24-T351. Note that also the corrosion resistance of the inventive alloy is significant better than the AA2x24-T351.
The fatigue crack growth rate (“FCGR”) has been measured according to ASTM E647-99 on 4-inch wide compact tension panels [C(T)] with an R-ratio of 0.1. In Table 3 the da/dn per cycle at a stress range of ΔK=27.5 ksi.in0.5 (=about 30 MPa.m0.5) of the inventive alloy has been compared with the reference high damage tolerant AA2x24-T351.
It can be clearly seen from the results in Table 4 that the crack growth of the inventive alloy is better than that of the high damage tolerant AA2x24-T351.
Another full-scale ingot taken from the batch DC-cast from Example 2 was produced into a plate of 6-inch thickness. Also this ingot was scalped, homogenised at 12 hrs/470° C.+24 hrs/475° C.+air cooled to ambient temperature. The ingot was pre-heated at 8 hrs/410° C. and then hot rolled to about 152 mm. The obtained hot-rolled plate was solution heat treated at 475° C. for about 7 hours followed by water-spray quenching. The plates were stress relieved by a cold stretching operation of about 2.0%. Several different two-step ageing processes have been applied.
The tensile results have been measured according to EN 10.002. The specimens were taken from the T/4-position. The plane strain fracture toughness, Kq, has been measured according to ASTM E399-90. If the validity requirements as given in ASTM E399-90 are met, these Kq values are a real material property and called K1c. The K1chas been measured at ambient room temperature (“RT”). The exfoliation corrosion resistance has been measured according to ASTM G34-97. The results are listed in Table 5. All ageing variants as shown in Table 5 showed “EA” rating.
In
Furthermore, also the elongation of our inventive alloy is superior to that disclosed in U.S. 2002/0150498-A1, Table 2. The overall property balance of alloy according to the present invention when processed to 6-inch thick plate is better than that disclosed in U.S.-2002/0150498-A1. In
Another full-scale ingot taken from the batch DC-cast from Example 2 was produced to plates of respectively 63.5 mm and 30 mm thickness. The cast ingot was scalped, homogenised at 12 hrs/470° C.+24 hrs/475° C.+air cooled to ambient temperature. The ingot was pre-heated at 8 hrs/410° C. and then hot rolled to respectively 63.5 and 30 mm. The obtained hot-rolled plates were solution heat treated (SHT) at 475° C. for about 2 to 4 hrs followed by water-spray quenching. The plates were stress relieved by a cold stretching operation of respectively 1.7% and 2.1% for the 63.5 mm and 30 mm plates. Several different two-step ageing processes have been applied.
The tensile results have been measured according to EN 10.002. The plane strain fracture toughness, Kq, has been measured according to ASTM E399-90 on CT-specimens. If the validity requirements as given in ASTM E399-90 are met, these Kq values are a real material property and called K1C. The K1C has been measured at ambient room temperature (“RT”). The EXCO exfoliation corrosion resistance has been measured according to ASTM G34-97. The results are listed in Table 6. All ageing variants as shown in Table 6 showed “EA”-rating.
In Table 7 the values are given of nowadays state of the art commercial upper wing alloys, and are typical data according to the supplier of that material (Alloy 7150-T7751 plate & 7150-T77511 extrusions, Alcoa Mill products, Inc., ACRP-069-B).
In
Another full-scale ingot taken from the batch DC-cast from Example 2 (hereinafter in Example 5 “Alloy A”) was produced to plates of 20 mm thickness. Also one other casting was made (designated “Alloy B” for this example) with a chemical composition (in wt. %): 7.39% Zn, 1.66% Mg, 1.59% Cu, 0.08% Zr, 0.03% Si and 0.04% Fe, balance aluminium and unavoidable impurities. These ingots were scalped, homogenised at 12 hrs/470° C.+24 hrs/475° C.+air cooled to ambient temperature. For further processing, three different routes were used.
Thus, four variants were produced and identified as: A1, A2, B1 and B3. The resultant plates were solution heat treated at 475° C. for about 2 to 4 hrs followed by water-spray quenching. The plates were stress relieved by a cold stretching operation of about 2.1%. Several different two-step ageing processes have been applied, whereby for example “120-5/150-10” means 5 hrs at 120° C. followed by 10 hrs at 150° C.
The tensile results have been measured according to EN 10.002. The plane strain fracture toughness, Kq, has been measured according to ASTM E399-90 on CT specimens. If the validity requirements as given in ASTM E399-90 are met, these Kq values are a real material property and called K1C or KIC. Note that most of the fracture toughness measurement in this example failed the meet the validity criteria on specimen thickness. The reported Kq values are a conservative with respect to K1C, in other words, the reported Kq values are in fact generally lower than the standard K1C values obtained when specimen size related validity criteria of ASTM E399-90 are satisfied. The exfoliation corrosion resistance has been measured according to ASTM G34-97. The results are listed in Table 8. All ageing variants as shown in Table 8 showed “EA”-rating for the EXCO resistance.
The results of Table 8 have are shown graphically in
On an industrial scale two alloys have been cast via DC-casting with a thickness of 440 mm and processed into sheet product of 4 mm. The alloy compositions are listed in Table 9, whereby alloy B represents an alloy composition according to a preferred embodiment of the invention when the alloy product is in the form of a sheet product.
The ingots were scalped, homogenized at 12 hrs/470° C.+24 hrs/475° C. and then hot rolled to an intermediate gauge of 65 mm and final hot rolled to about 9 mm. Finally the hot rolled intermediate products have been cold rolled to a gauge of 4 mm. The obtained sheet products were solution heat treated at 475° C. for about 20 minutes, followed by water-spray quenching. The resultant sheets were stress relieved by a cold stretching operation of about 2%. The stretched sheets have been aged thereafter for 5 hrs/120° C.+8 hrs/165° C. Mechanical properties have tested analogue to Example 1 and the results are listed in Table 10.
The results of this full-scale trial confirm the results of Example 1 that the positive addition of Mn in the defined range significantly improves the toughness (both UPE and Ts/Rp) of the sheet product resulting in a very good and desirable strength-toughness balance.
On an industrial scale two alloys have been cast via DC-casting with a thickness of 440 mm and processed into a plate product having a thickness of 152 mm. The alloy compositions are listed in Table 11, whereby alloy C represents a typical alloy falling within the AA7050-series range and alloy D represents an alloy composition according to a preferred embodiment of the invention when the alloy product is in the form of plate, e.g. thick plate.
The ingots were scalped, homogenized in a two-step cycle of 12 hrs/470° C.+24 hrs/475° C. and air cooled to ambient temperature. The ingot was pre-heated at 8 hrs/410° C. and then hot rolled to final gauge. The obtained plate products were solution heat treated at 475° C. for about 6 hours, followed by water-spray quenching. The resultant plates were stretched by a cold stretching operation for about 2%. The stretched plates have been aged using a two-step ageing practice of first 5 hrs/120° C. followed by 12 hrs/165° C. Mechanical properties have been tested analogue to Example 3 in three test directions and the results are listed in Table 12 and 13. The specimens were taken from S/4 position from the plate for the L- and LT-testing direction and at S/2 for the ST-testing direction The Kapp has been measured at S/2 and S/4 locations in the L-T direction using panels having a width of 160 mm centre cracked panels and having a thickness of 6.3 mm after milling. These Kapp measurements have been carried out at room temperature in accordance with ASTM E561. The designation “ok” for the SCC means that no failure occurred at 180 MPa/45 days.
From the results of Tables 12 and 13 it can be seen that the alloy according to the invention in comparison with AA7050 has similar corrosion performance, the strength (yield strength and tensile strength) are comparable or slightly better than AA7050, in particular in the ST-direction. But more importantly the alloy of the present invention shown significantly better results in elongation (or A50) in the ST-direction. The elongation (or A50), in particular the elongation in ST-direction, is an important engineering parameter of amongst others ribs for use in an aircraft wing structure. The alloy product according to the invention further shows a significant improvement in fracture toughness (both Kic and Kapp).
On an industrial scale two alloys have been cast via DC-casting with a thickness of 440 mm and processed into a plate product having a thickness of 63.5 mm. The alloy compositions are listed in Table 14, whereby alloy F represents an alloy composition according to a preferred embodiment of the invention when the alloy product is in the form of plate for wings.
The ingots were scalped, homogenized in a two-step cycle of 12 hrs/470° C.+24 hrs/475° C. and air cooled to ambient temperature. The ingot was pre-heated at 8 hrs/410° C. and then hot rolled to final gauge. The obtained plate products were solution heat treated at 475° C. for about 4 hours, followed by water-spray quenching. The resultant plates were stretched by a cold stretching operation for about 2%. The stretched plates have been aged using a two-step ageing practice of first 5 hrs/120° C. followed by 10 hrs/155° C.
Mechanical properties have been tested analogue to Example 3 in three test directions are listed in Table 15. The specimens were taken from T/2 position. Both alloys had a EXCO test result of “EB”.
From the results of Table 15 it can be seen that the positive addition of Mn results in an increase of the tensile properties. But most importantly the properties, and in particular the elongation (or A50), in the ST-direction are significantly improved. The elongation (or A50) in the ST-direction is an important engineering parameter for structural parts of an aircraft, e.g. wing plate material.
Having now fully described the invention, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as hereon described.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03076048 | Apr 2003 | EP | regional |
This claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/469,829 filed May 13, 2003 and European patent application No. 03076048.2 filed Apr. 10, 2003, both incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3791880 | Hunsicker et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3794531 | Markworth et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3857973 | McKee et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3881966 | Staley et al. | May 1975 | A |
| 4140549 | Chia et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4305763 | Quist et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4477292 | Brown | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4589932 | Park | May 1986 | A |
| 4828631 | Ponchel et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4927470 | Cho | May 1990 | A |
| 4946517 | Cho | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4954188 | Ponchel et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4976790 | McAuliffe et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4988394 | Cho | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5108520 | Liu et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5186235 | Ward, Jr. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5213639 | Colvin et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5221377 | Hunt, Jr. et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5312498 | Anderson | May 1994 | A |
| 5356495 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5496423 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5496426 | Murtha | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5560789 | Sainfort et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5593516 | Cassada, III | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5624632 | Baumann | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5681405 | Newton et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5718780 | Bryant et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5833775 | Newton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5858134 | Bechet et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5865911 | Miyasato et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5865914 | Karabin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5888320 | Dorward | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5938867 | Dorward et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6027582 | Shahani et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6120623 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6224992 | Delbeke et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6315842 | Shahani et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6337147 | Haszler et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6543122 | Perkins et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6562154 | Rioja et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6569542 | Warner et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6602361 | Warner et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6652678 | Marshall et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6743308 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6790407 | Fridlyander et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6972110 | Chakrabarti et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7060139 | Senkov et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7250223 | Miyachi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 20020121319 | Chakrabarti et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20040007295 | Lorentzen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040101434 | Fridlyander et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 68927149 | Apr 1997 | DE |
| 102004010700 | Oct 2004 | DE |
| 10392805 | Jun 2005 | DE |
| 0368005 | May 1990 | EP |
| 0377779 | Jul 1990 | EP |
| 0587274 | Mar 1994 | EP |
| 0605947 | Jul 1994 | EP |
| 0799900 | Oct 1997 | EP |
| 0829552 | Mar 1998 | EP |
| 1026270 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1114877 | Jul 2001 | EP |
| 1143027 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1170394 | Jan 2002 | EP |
| 1231290 | Aug 2002 | EP |
| 1306455 | May 2003 | EP |
| 0925956 | May 1963 | GB |
| 2114601 | Aug 1983 | GB |
| 61049796 | Mar 1986 | JP |
| 62122744 | Jun 1987 | JP |
| 62122745 | Jun 1987 | JP |
| 63319143 | Dec 1988 | JP |
| 1039340 | Feb 1989 | JP |
| 1208438 | Aug 1989 | JP |
| 2047244 | Feb 1990 | JP |
| 6228691 | Aug 1994 | JP |
| 2002241882 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2044098 | Sep 1995 | RU |
| 1 625 043 | Oct 1995 | RU |
| 2165996 | Apr 2001 | RU |
| 664 570 | May 1979 | SU |
| 9526420 | Oct 1995 | WO |
| 9628582 | Sep 1996 | WO |
| 9629440 | Sep 1996 | WO |
| 9722724 | Jun 1997 | WO |
| 9837251 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| 0054967 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| 0210468 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| 02052053 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| 02075010 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO 02100468 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 03076677 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| 03085145 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 04001080 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050189044 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60469829 | May 2003 | US |
