At the present time, most cutting inserts comprise substrates made from cemented carbides because cemented carbides have a high degree of toughness and good wear resistance. However, the use of cutting tools and cutting inserts (“ceramic tools”) having ceramic substrates is increasing. These ceramic tools find use in a wide range of high-speed finishing operations and for the machining of difficult-to-machine materials at a high removal rate. The increase in use of ceramic tools may be due to improvements in alloyed ceramics and ceramic-matrix composites, as well as with the advances in ceramic processing technology. The ceramics used in cutting tools are typically inorganic, nonmetallic materials.
The production of ceramic tools typically involves the consolidation and sintering of powdered ceramics. Sintering provides the necessary densification of the consolidated powder and may optionally be performed under pressure. In pressureless sintering, the powder is first shaped into a green, or unsintered, body which may then be sintered to achieve the necessary densification. Hot pressing of ceramics involves heating along with simultaneous uniaxial pressing of the powder in a die. Although hot-pressed ceramics are more expensive, they may be prepared with a finer grain size, a higher density and higher transverse rupture strength than cold-pressed materials.
The ceramics currently used in cutting tools are based either on aluminum oxide (alumina, Al2O3) or silicon nitride (Si3N4). Other ceramics, such as, magnesia, yttria, zirconia, chromium oxide, and titanium carbide may be used as additives to aid sintering or to form alloyed ceramics with improved thermo-mechanical properties.
A ceramic tool comprising an aluminum oxide substrate may be used in metal machining with high cutting speed due to the chemical inertness and great strength of the aluminum oxide substrate. Commercially significant aluminum oxide ceramic tools were basically fine grained (less than 5 μm) Al2O3 with magnesia added as a sintering aid and grain growth inhibitor. Aluminum oxide ceramics may also be alloyed with suboxides or titanium or chromium to form solid solutions. The three main commercially available aluminum oxide based tool materials are Al2O3/Ti, Al2O3/ZrO2, and Al2O3 reinforced with silicon carbide (SiC) whiskers. Other Al2O3 base ceramics may have additives of TiN, TiB2, Ti(C,N), and Zr(C,N).
Alumina-zirconia (Al2O3/ZrO2) is an alloyed ceramic. The addition of zirconium oxide increases the higher fracture toughness and thermal shock resistance of an aluminum oxide substrate. The toughening of aluminum oxide with zirconium oxide exploits a specific crystallographic change, a martensitic type transformation, that results from an energy absorbing mechanism. The presence of metastable tetraorthoganol ZrO2 provides the potential for transformation under stress into a stable monoclinic structure. The transformation acts as a stress absorber and prevents, even when cracks exist, further cracking.
Typically, the zirconia oxide particles are concentrated at the aluminum oxide grain boundaries. Although fracture is intergranular, the presence of these particles is believed to provide additional toughness before failure can occur by fracture. The three most popular compositions contain 10, 25, and 40 weight % (wt. %) ZrO2 with the remainder being aluminum oxide. The 40 wt. % ZrO2 composition is close to the eutectic concentration. The higher ZrO2 compositions are less hard but tougher.
Cutting inserts may be coated to increase their resistance to wear. Single or multiple layers of coatings by chemical vapor deposition (“CVD”) or physical vapor deposition (“CVD”) may be applied to cutting tool. Titanium nitride (TiN), titanium carbon nitride (TiCN) and aluminum oxide (Al2O3) are among the most popular CVD coating materials for carbide-based cutting tools. Thin coatings (2 μm to 5 μm) on ceramic substrates have been developed primarily to limit chemical interactions between the tool and the work material and improve wear resistance. Examples of the very recent research efforts in applying the latest CVD coating technologies to ceramic cutting inserts include coated reinforced ceramic cuffing tools, U.S. Pat. No. 6,447,896; coated silicon nitride ceramic cutting tools, United States Patent Application No. 2002/0076284; coated composite ceramic cutting inserts containing a hard phase dispersed with an alumina matrix phase, Published United States Patent Application No. 2002/0054794.
There is a need to develop new coating technologies for ceramic tools in order to further improve the wear and chemical resistance of ceramic tools to meet the ever-increasing demands on machining productivity.
In at least one aspect, the present invention is directed to cutting tools comprising a substrate, wherein the substrate comprises aluminum oxide and zirconium oxide and a diffusion bonding enhanced layer. The present invention is also directed to methods of forming a diffusion bonding enhanced layer on a substrate. A diffusion bonding enhanced layer increases the adherence of a wear resistant coating applied to the cutting tool. The diffusion bonding enhanced layer comprises the reaction products between a mixture comprising nitrogen and aluminum chloride, and at least the zirconium oxide present in the substrate.
In another aspect, the present invention is directed to a cutting insert comprising a substrate, wherein the substrate comprises aluminum oxide and zirconium oxide, an intermediate layer comprising nitrides of zirconium, zirconium oxide and nitrides of aluminum, and at least one wear resistant coating.
An embodiment of the method of the present invention comprises exposing an substrate to aluminum chloride and nitrogen, wherein the substrate comprises alumina and zirconia; and coating the substrate by at least one of chemical vapor deposition process or pressure vapor deposition process. The substrate may comprise, by weight, from 0.5 to 45% zirconium oxide of the total weight of the substrate. The method may include exposing the substrate to a gaseous mixture comprising aluminum chloride and nitrogen.
The coating on the substrate may be applied by CVD or PVD, as well as other means. Each coating may independently comprise at least one of a metal carbide, a metal nitride, a metal silicon, and a metal oxide of a metal oxide of a metal selected from Groups IIIA, IVB, VB, and VIB of the periodic table, such as, but not limited to at least one of titanium nitride (TiN), titanium carbonitride (TiCN), titanium aluminum nitride (TiAlN), titanium aluminum nitride plus carbon (TiAlN═C), aluminum titanium nitride (AlTiN), aluminum titanium nitride plus carbon (AlTiN═C), titanium aluminum nitride plus tungsten carbide/carbon (TiAlN═WC/C), aluminum titanium nitride plus tungsten carbide/carbon (AlTiN═WC/C), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), titanium diboride (TiB2), tungsten carbide carbon (WC/C), chromium nitride (CrN) and aluminum chromium nitride (AlCrN).
The reader will appreciate the foregoing details and advantages of the present invention, as well as others, upon consideration of the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention. The reader also may comprehend such additional details and advantages of the present invention upon making and/or using embodiments within the present invention.
The features and advantages of the present invention may be better understood by reference to the accompanying figures in which:
The present invention relates cutting tools comprising a substrate comprising aluminum oxide and zirconium oxide, and a diffusion bonding enhanced layer. The diffusion bonding enhanced layer results from the reaction between reagents and at least one of the zirconium oxide and aluminum oxide in the substrate. The diffusion bonding enhanced layer may comprise nitrides of zirconium and nitrides of aluminum and the presence of these compounds enhances the adhesion of subsequent coatings. Therefore, the diffusion bonding enhanced layer may be used as an intermediate layer between the substrate and a wear resistant coating. The presence of a diffusion bonding enhanced layer may significantly improve the tool life of coated Al2O3 ceramic cutting inserts. An embodiment of the present invention results in a chemical reaction between at least one of the aluminum oxide and the zirconium oxide of the substrate and a mixture of nitrogen (N2) and aluminum chloride (AlCl3) in a surface region. The reaction may be between a gaseous mixture of N2 and AlCl3 and the components of the substrate. Single or multiple wear resistant coatings may be applied by a known coating means, including, but not limited to, CVD and PVD.
The thickness of the diffusion bonded enhanced layer depends on the diffusion of the reactants into the substrate. Diffusion is the process by which molecules intermingle as a result of their kinetic energy of random motion, or in other words, it is the result of random motion of the individual atoms in a surface region of the substrate, i.e. the aluminum oxide with zirconium oxide ceramic substrate in this invention. At a relatively high temperature, the rate of diffusion increases and, therefore, certain reactants may be chemically bonded to a surface region at a certain depth into the substrate. The diffusion bonding enhanced layer does not intend to function as a wear resistant coating, rather as an intermediate layer between the ceramic substrate and the refractory metals-based CVD coatings to increase adherence. Experiments have shown consistently that the direct application of CVD coatings on the aluminum oxide with zirconium oxide ceramic substrate often does not result in good adhesion. The coatings typically peel and crack during the machining process resulting in a short service life of the ceramic tool.
The diffusion bonding enhanced layer provided in this invention may be relatively uniform, stable and highly adherent layer to the ceramic substrate. It is believed that the diffusion bonding enhanced layer comprises the products of a reaction between nitrogen and aluminum chloride, and the zirconium oxide present in the substrate. The thickness of the diffusion bonding enhanced layer may be controlled by adjusting at least one of the temperature, pressure, reaction time, surface roughness of the substrate, as well as other parameters to produce the desired thickness of the coating.
Embodiments of the cutting tool of the present invention comprise a substrate comprising aluminum oxide and zirconium oxide. Typically, such presently commercially available substrates comprise, by weight, from 0.5 to 45% zirconium oxide. In certain embodiments, such as where a harder substrate may be desired, the substrate may comprise, by weight, from 0.5 to 26% zirconium oxide or preferably, from 2 to 26% zirconium oxide, or more preferably from 9 to 11% zirconium oxide.
Embodiments of the cutting tool may comprise single or multiple wear resistant or chemical resistant coatings, together referred to herein as “wear resistant coatings.” The single or multiple wear resistant coatings on a diffusion enhanced bonding layer as a bonding interface intermediate the first wear resistant coating and coatings and the substrate, results in enhanced adhesive performance of coating and the aluminum oxide with zirconium oxide ceramic substrate is enhanced. The cutting tool may comprise any coating capable of being deposited by CVD or PVD. More particularly, the wear resistant coatings may independently comprise at least one of a metal carbide, a metal nitride, a metal carbonitride, a metal silicon and a metal oxide of a metal selected from groups IIIA, IVB, VB, and VIB of the periodic table or combination thereof, such as, but not limited to, titanium nitride (TiN), titanium carbonitride (TiCN), titanium aluminum nitride (TiAlN), titanium aluminum nitride plus carbon (TiAlN═C), aluminum titanium nitride (AlTiN), aluminum titanium nitride plus carbon (AlTiN═C), titanium aluminum nitride plus tungsten carbide/carbon (TiAlN═WC/C), aluminum titanium nitride plus tungsten carbide/carbon (AlTiN═WC/C), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), titanium diboride (TiB2), tungsten carbide carbon (WC/C), chromium nitride (CrN) and aluminum chromium nitride (AlCrN). A typical commercial multilayer coating for a cutting tool may comprise, for example, a first wear resistant coating of titanium nitride, a second wear resistant coating of titanium carbonitride, and the third wear resistant coating of titanium nitride.
The thickness of each wear resistant coating may be any thickness desired for the specific machining application or the material to be machined. The total thickness of the coating on the surface of the substrate will typically be from about 1 to about 20 micrometers or more typically from 1 to 5 micrometers. Individual wear resistant coatings, typically, may have a thickness of from 0.25 to 2 micrometers.
Embodiments of the cutting tools of the invention may also comprise a substrate, wherein the substrate comprises aluminum oxide and zirconium oxide, an intermediate layer comprising nitrides of zirconium, zirconium oxide and nitrides of aluminum, and at least one wear resistant coating.
The present invention also relates to a method of coating a cutting tool. Embodiments of the method comprise exposing an substrate to aluminum chloride and nitrogen, wherein the substrate comprises aluminum oxide and zirconium oxide, and coating the substrate by at least one process selected from CVD and PVD. Embodiments of the method of the present invention include a substrate comprising, by weight, from 0.5 to 45% zirconium oxide. In certain embodiments where a harder substrate may be desired, the substrate comprises, by weight, from 0.5 to 26% zirconium oxide or preferably, by weight, from 2 to 26% zirconium oxide, or more preferably, by weight, from 9 to 11% zirconium oxide.
The substrate may be exposed to a gaseous mixture comprising aluminum chloride and nitrogen. The gaseous mixture may comprise an aluminum chloride concentration from 25% to 99% by weight or more preferably, from 75% to 99% by weight. The gaseous mixture may contain other components that are inert or essentially inert, by “essentially inert” is meant that the additional components do not interfere with formation of a diffusion bonding enhanced layer. When a gaseous mixture comprising aluminum chloride and nitrogen is used to form the diffusion bonding enhanced layer any pressure may be used although higher pressures will allow more interaction between the gaseous phase and the solid phase. The pressure of gaseous mixture used in the diffusion process may be used to control the reaction for forming the diffusion enhanced layer. A higher pressure may promote a higher level of reactivity between the zirconium oxide and nitrogen. Therefore, to provide the appropriate control, it may be preferable to maintain a pressure from 200 millibar to 1500 millibar or even a pressure from 400 millibar to 1000 millibar.
Diffusion may occur in a solid at any temperature. Either the gaseous mixture or the substrate may be heated to increase the rate of diffusion. Higher temperatures may result in a higher rate of diffusion but the operating temperatures should not be so high as to cause any undesired changes in the solid substrate. Therefore, for substrates comprising aluminum oxide and zirconium oxide, it may be preferred that the gaseous mixture or the substrate is at a temperature from 50° C. to 1400° C. or from 50° C. to 1200° C. More narrow temperature ranges may be desired to maintain a commercially acceptable rate of diffusion and not affect the substrate, therefore, it may be desired to have a temperature of the gaseous mixture or the substrate from 500° C. to 1200° C. or more preferably from 1000° C. to 1200° C.
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, time, temperatures, and so forth used in the present specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, may inherently contain certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements.
The following examples demonstrate the formation of diffusion bonding enhanced layer on the substrate comprising aluminum oxide and zirconium oxide and the increased adherence of the wear resistant coatings on the substrate. The ceramic substrate of this example comprised in weight percentage, 90% Al2O3 and 10% ZrO2. The substrate had a density of 4.0 g/cm3, a hardness of 1800 HV, a toughness of 4.5 MN/m3/2, and a heat transfer coefficient of 0.07 cal/cm sec ° C.
The substrate was exposed to a gaseous mixture comprising aluminum chloride and nitrogen under a pressure of 500 millibar. The substrate was heated to a temperature of approximately 1020° C. The ratio of AlCl3/N2 in the gaseous mixture was approximately 7.
Testing of Coated Cutting Tools
Scratch Test
Performance tests were conducted to determine whether a cutting tool comprising a diffusion bonding enhanced layer intermediate to the substrate and the first wear resistant coating would provide a strong adherence for the CVD or PVD coatings (single or multiple layers). Two cutting tools were prepared one with a multiple wear resistant coatings applied directly to the substrate and a second with a diffusion enhanced bonding layer intermediate to the substrate and the multiple wear resistant coatings formed by the method described above. Both cutting inserts were similarly coated with TiN—TiCN—TiN with three micrometers in thickness by CVD.
Machining Tests
A series of comparative machining tests was carried out under various cutting conditions and with various work materials to demonstrate the advantages of a cutting tool comprising an intermediate diffusion bonding enhanced layer and multiple wear resistant coatings.
Three Al2O3/ZrO2 ceramic cutting tools were selected for the comparative machining test—as shown in Table 1. All the cutting inserts have the same style and geometry, designated as SNEN120412, which denotes a square shape with an inscribed diameter of 12 mm, a thickness of 4.76 mm, and a corner nose radius of 1.20 mm according to the ISO standard. The cutting inserts of Case 1 have a single T-Land around the cutting edges.
The machining tests of Case 1 were performed under the following cutting conditions:
Insert designated C1B was coated directly on the substrate while insert designated C1C was coated accordingly to the method of the present invention, as described above. The test results are shown in
Three Al2O3/ZrO2 ceramic cutting tools were selected for the comparative machining test, as shown in Table 2. All the cutting inserts have the same style and geometry, designated as RCGX251200, which denotes a round shape with a diameter of 25 mm, a side clearance angle of 7 degrees, and a thickness of 12.7 mm, according to the ISO standard. The cutting inserts of Case 2 were prepared with double T-Lands around the cutting edges.
The machining tests of Case 2 were performed under the following test conditions:
The machining test results of Case 2 are shown in
It is to be understood that the present description illustrates those aspects of the invention relevant to a clear understanding of the invention. Certain aspects of the invention that would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art and that, therefore, would not facilitate a better understanding of the invention have not been presented in order to simplify the present description. Although embodiments of the present invention have been described, one of ordinary skill in the art will, upon considering the foregoing description, recognize that many modifications and variations of the invention may be employed. All such variations and modifications of the invention are intended to be covered by the foregoing description and the following claims.
This non-provisional application is a divisional application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/848,776, entitled Al2O3 CERAMIC TOOLS WITH DIFFUSION BONDING ENHANCED LAYER, which was filed on May 19, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,581,906.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3640689 | Glaski et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3854971 | Conley et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3900592 | Kennedy et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
4101703 | Schintlmeister | Jul 1978 | A |
4268569 | Hale | May 1981 | A |
4269899 | Fuyama et al. | May 1981 | A |
4282289 | Kullander et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4399168 | Kullander et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4409003 | Sarin et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4463062 | Hale | Jul 1984 | A |
4490191 | Hale | Dec 1984 | A |
4497874 | Hale | Feb 1985 | A |
4501786 | Hale | Feb 1985 | A |
4525415 | Porat | Jun 1985 | A |
RE32111 | Lambert et al. | Apr 1986 | E |
4608098 | Hale | Aug 1986 | A |
4610931 | Nemeth et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4619866 | Smith et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4714660 | Gates, Jr. | Dec 1987 | A |
4830886 | Cho et al. | May 1989 | A |
5204167 | Saijo et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5232318 | Santhanam et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5236740 | Peters et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5325747 | Santhanam et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336292 | Weinl | Aug 1994 | A |
5364209 | Santhanam et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368938 | Holtz et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370944 | Omori et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372873 | Yoshimura et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5374471 | Yoshimura et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380408 | Svensson | Jan 1995 | A |
5415674 | Feistritzer | May 1995 | A |
5419927 | Dietrich | May 1995 | A |
5436071 | Odani et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5451469 | Gustafson et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5478634 | Setoyama et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484468 | Ostlund et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5494635 | Bennett | Feb 1996 | A |
5560839 | Bennett | Oct 1996 | A |
5567526 | Peters et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571616 | Phillips et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5624766 | Moriguchi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5635256 | Olson | Jun 1997 | A |
5674620 | Puiia | Oct 1997 | A |
5700518 | Lee | Dec 1997 | A |
5713133 | Bhat | Feb 1998 | A |
5718948 | Ederyd et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5750247 | Bryant et al. | May 1998 | A |
5786069 | Ljungberg et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5891522 | Olson | Apr 1999 | A |
5900288 | Kuhman | May 1999 | A |
5920760 | Yoshimura et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5958569 | Leverenz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6056999 | Narasimhan | May 2000 | A |
6080477 | Narasimhan | Jun 2000 | A |
6214247 | Leverenz et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6358428 | Leverenz et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6447890 | Leverenz et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447896 | Augustine | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6827975 | Leverenz et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6929851 | Leverenz et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6939607 | Kato et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7581906 | Fang et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20020054794 | Kato et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020076284 | Kato | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20050260454 | Fang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20080057327 | Fang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0186831 | Dec 1985 | EP |
0459865 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0678594 | Oct 1995 | EP |
1413648 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1198609 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1291387 | Oct 1972 | GB |
1291388 | Oct 1972 | GB |
56-9365 | Jan 1981 | JP |
60-127905 | Jul 1985 | JP |
3-87368 | Apr 1991 | JP |
04-289002 | Oct 1992 | JP |
05-16031 | Jan 1993 | JP |
6-57429 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6-108254 | Apr 1994 | JP |
WO 9220841 | Nov 1992 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100227160 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10848776 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 12400007 | US |