Patent Grant
8093431
1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments of this invention relates to a novel and dependable process for preparing effective aldehyde-amine products, e.g., certain embodiments being formaldehyde-amine products, usable as noxious sulfur scavengers.
More particularly, embodiments of this invention relates to a novel and dependable process for preparing effective aldehyde-amine products, e.g., certain embodiments being formaldehyde-amine products, usable as noxious sulfur scavengers, where the process efficiently produces aldehyde-amine adduct products that do not form solids or gels upon exposure to fluids or gases containing noxious sulfur species, in the case of formaldehyde-amine adducts, are substantially or completely formaldehyde free (no detectable formaldehyde), are cost effective, and are non-foaming. The lack of solids reduces the plugging of production equipment or the plugging of pipe lines, which is not only undesirable, but can also be hazardous.
2. Description of the Related Art
In prior art, stepwise addition of formaldehyde to desired moles of amine has been taught in U.S. Pat. No. 5,030,762 and references cited therein. Sterically hindered amines have also been employed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,112,052. Aldehyde adducts of polymers like polyacylamide are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,230,608; polyimines in U.S. Pat. No. 5,128,049, direct use of trithianes are additional examples of alternative teachings available in prior art.
Even though many aldehyde-amine and formaldehyde-amine adducts have been disclosed, many of these adducts form solids or gels, especially when exposed to fluids or gases containing noxious sulfur containing species, contain free formaldehyde or generate free formaldehyde upon exposure to fluids or gases containing noxious sulfur containing species, when formaldehyde is the aldehyde, form foams, and are cost ineffective. Thus, there is a need in the art for an effective process for preparing commercially effective aldehyde-amine adduct products that are formaldehyde free, when formaldehyde is the aldehyde, efficient, non-foaming, and non-solid forming and/or gel forming.
Embodiments of this invention provides a new process for the preparation of aldehyde-amine adduct products that is reproducible, producing a unique and effective aldehyde-amine products. The method utilizes an amine to aldehyde ratio of approximately 1:2 (or 0.5) reacted in the presence of an alcohol at a temperature and for a time sufficient to produce an aldehyde-amine product having a specific gravity so that the product has a scavenging activity greater than a scavenging activity of a composition prepared using a higher or lower amine to formaldehyde ratio. In certain embodiment, the ratio is between about 0.8 and about 0.45. In certain embodiments, the scavenging activity at least one fold higher than a product prepared with a higher or lower amine to aldehyde ratio.
Embodiments of this invention provides a new process for the preparation of formaldehyde-amine adduct products that is reproducible, producing a unique and effective formylated product. The method utilizes an amine to formaldehyde ratio of approximately 1:2 in the presence of an alcohol at a temperature and for a time sufficient to achieve a desired specific gravity, where the formylated products have scavenging activities nearly threefold higher than compositions prepared using a higher amine to formaldehyde ratio. i.e., ratios greater than about 0.5. In certain embodiment, the ratio is between about 0.8 and about 0.45.
Embodiments of this invention provides a formaldehyde-amine adduct or formylated product prepared by the reaction of an amine and formaldehyde at a ratio of about 1:2 in the presence of an alcohol at a temperature and for a time sufficient to achieve a desired specific gravity. In certain embodiment, the ratio is between about 0.8 and about 0.45.
Embodiments of this invention provides a method for reducing noxious sulfur containing fluids or gases comprising adding an effective aldehyde-amine adduct product, certain embodiments a formaldehyde-amine adduct product, prepared by the reaction of an amine and formaldehyde at a ratio of about 1:2 in the presence of an alcohol at a temperature and for a time sufficient to produce a product having a specific gravity and characterized by having a higher scavenging activity compared to a product produced with a higher or lower amine to aldehyde ratio to the fluid or gases, where the effective amount is sufficient to reduce the amount of noxious sulfur containing components in the fluid or gas. In certain embodiment, the ratio is between about 0.8 and about 0.45. Usage is dependent on operation conditions (e.g., crude composition, level of H2S, temperature, flow rate or the like); however, about 3.5 moles of the gas is completely removed per liter of the adduct under laboratory screening conditions.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following detailed description together with the appended illustrative drawings in which like elements are numbered the same:
The inventors have found that formulations of aldehyde-amine adducts can be prepared with optimal sour gas scavenging capacity. The inventors have also found a reproducible process for manufacturing the formulations. The inventors have also found that specific gravity can be used to control the manufacturing process. The inventors have also found that the addition of alcohols during the amine-formaldehyde reaction mixtures give rise to alcoholic adducts which cooperate in the scavenging propensity of the formulations of this invention. The products are characterized in that the specific gravity of the product be between 3% and 7% less than the specific gravity of the true mixture of starting materials and that the reaction time is less than about 12 hours. In certain embodiments, the products are characterized in that the specific gravity of the product be between 4% and 6% less than the specific gravity of the true mixture starting materials. Additionally, the adducts are characterized by having a number ofpeaks in their GC/MS chromatogram between about 16 minutes and about 31 minutes. In other embodiments, the adducts are characterized by a sharp peak and trailing shoulder in its GC/MS chromatogram appearing at between about 21 minutes and about 31 minutes for a dibutyl amine/formaldehyde product. The process efficiently produces aldehyde-amine adduct products that do not form solids or gels upon exposure to fluids or gases containing noxious sulfur species, in the case of formaldehyde-amine adducts, are substantially or completely formaldehyde free (no detectable formaldehyde), are cost effective, and are non-foaming. The lack of solids reduces the plugging of production equipment or the plugging of pipe lines, which is not only undesirable, but can also be hazardous. The term substantially means that the amount of detectable formaldehyde is below the acceptable levels set by governmental agencies.
A new process for the preparation of aldehyde-amine adduct products has been developed. The process is reproducible, producing a unique and effective formulation. Surprisingly, an amine to aldehyde ratio of approximately 1:2 was established as optimal. In prior art teaching, alcohol has been added as a reaction solvent and/or to help stabilize reaction product. However, alcohol present during the amine-aldehyde reaction was found to result in the formation of highly effective adduct formulations. Scavenging capacity test results were surprisingly impressive with activities in certain embodiments nearly threefold those of prior art or current commercial formulations. Thus, adduct products produced with greater amine to aldehyde ratios >0.5 or lower amine to aldehyde ratios <0.5 give inferior products. In certain embodiment, the inventors have found amine to aldehyde ratios between about 0.8 and about 0.45. In other embodiments, the inventors have found amine to aldehyde ratios between about 0.75 and 0.45. The process efficiently produces aldehyde-amine adduct products that do not form solids or gels upon exposure to fluids or gases containing noxious sulfur species, in the case of formaldehyde-amine adducts, are substantially or completely formaldehyde free (no detectable formaldehyde), are cost effective, and are non-foaming. The lack of solids reduces the plugging of production equipment or the plugging of pipe lines, which is not only undesirable, but can also be hazardous. In certain embodiments, the reaction time is between about 5 and about 12 hours. In other embodiments, the reaction time is between about 8 and about 12 hours. In other embodiments, the reaction time is between about 9 and about 12 hours. In other embodiments, the reaction time is between about 9.5 and 12 hours.
Embodiments of this invention broadly relates to a new process for the preparation of formaldehyde-amine adduct products that is reproducible, producing a unique and effective formulation, using an amine to aldehyde (e.g., formaldehyde) ratio of approximately 1:2 in the presence of an alcohol at a temperature and for a time sufficient to achieve a desired specific gravity, where the formulation has a higher scavenging activity than compositions prepared with higher or lower ratios. In certain embodiments, the formulations of this invention can be nearly threefold higher than compositions prepared using a higher or lower amine to formaldehyde ratios. In certain embodiment, the inventors have found amine to aldehyde ratios between about 0.8 and about 0.45. In other embodiments, the inventors have found amine to aldehyde ratios between about 0.75 and 0.45. The process efficiently produces aldehyde-amine adduct products that do not form solids or gels upon exposure to fluids or gases containing noxious sulfur species, in the case of formaldehyde-amine adducts, are substantially or completely formaldehyde free (no detectable formaldehyde), are cost effective, and are non-foaming.
Embodiments of this invention also broadly relates to a formaldehyde-amine adduct product prepared by the reaction of an amine and formaldehyde at a ratio of about 1:2 in the presence of an alcohol at a temperature and for a time sufficient to achieve a desired specific gravity, where the formulation has a higher scavenging activity than compositions prepared with higher or lower ratios. In certain embodiment, the inventors have found amine to aldehyde ratios between about 0.8 and about 0.45. In other embodiments, the inventors have found amine to aldehyde ratios between about 0.75 and 0.45. The aldehyde-amine adduct products do not form solids or gels upon exposure to fluids or gases containing noxious sulfur species, in the case of formaldehyde-amine adducts, are substantially or completely formaldehyde free (no detectable formaldehyde), are cost effective, and are non-foaming.
Embodiments of this invention also broadly relates to a method for reducing noxious sulfur containing of fluids or gases comprising adding an effective a formaldehyde-amine adduct product prepared by the reaction of an amine and formaldehyde at a ratio of about 1:2 in the presence of an alcohol at a temperature and for a time sufficient to achieve a desired specific gravity, where the formulation has a higher scavenging activity than compositions prepared with higher or lower ratios, to the fluid or gases, where the effective amount is sufficient to reduce the amount of noxious sulfur containing components in the fluid or gas. In certain embodiment, the inventors have found amine to aldehyde ratios between about 0.8 and about 0.45. In other embodiments, the inventors have found amine to aldehyde ratios between about 0.75 and 0.45. The aldehyde-amine adduct products do not form solids or gels upon exposure to fluids or gases containing noxious sulfur species, in the case of formaldehyde-amine adducts, are substantially or completely formaldehyde free (no detectable formaldehyde), are cost effective, and are non-foaming.
Result & Discussion
I. Chemistry
I.1. Reagents
In the current practice, for an amine: formaldehyde adduct product, an amine to formaldehyde molar equivalent ratio of 1:1.33 (0.75:1) is used to prepare a formylated N,N-dibutylamine (DBA) product. This product is currently sold as Sulfa Clear 8849 or WFT 9809 available from Weatherford International of Houston, Tex., USA. Table 1 tabulates data on two current formulations of this formylated N,N-dibutylamine (DBA) product. Paraformaldehyde is the formaldehyde (FM) source used in these formylation process examples.
Starting with the current reagent formula as set forth in Table 1, the inventors varied the DBA to FM ratio and varied the reaction temperature in the presence or absence of n-butanol (BT) to determine whether a repeatable method and a reproducible product could be designed to overcome the problems associated with the current product and its manufacturing.
I.1.a. N,N-Dibutylamine to Paraformaldehyde Ratio
N,N-Dibutylamine (DBA) to paraformaldehyde (FM) molar ratios of 1:1, 1:2, 1:2.5, 1:3,2:1, 1.5:2 were studied in preparations of formylated adducts and tested for H2S scavenging capacity. The scavenging capacity for each formulation (in terms of breakthrough time in minutes) of resultant reaction products were tested and the results are tabulated in Table2 including initial observations.
1[DBA]: Concentration of N,N-dibutylamine, DBA.
2[FM]: Concentration of formaldehyde, FM.
3Corrected
From the results tabulated in Table 2, a DBA to FM ratio of 1:2 produced a formulation with the highest effective H2S scavenging capacity. Next, process conditions were optimized to reproducibly produce products with the same and/or better scavenging capacity or effectiveness than found in current products or products prepared with different amine-aldehyde mole ratios.
I.1.b. Reaction with and without n-Butanol
The inventors also found that adding an alcohol such as n-butanol at the onset of reaction rather than after the reaction produced products having scavenging capacities higher than products prepared in the absence of alcohol. In the former, a breakthrough time of 112 minutes was achieved; whereas in the latter, a breakthrough time of 86 minutes was achieved as tabulated in Table 2. In addition to acting as an adduct stabilizing solvent, in prior art, addition of alcohol is known to yield ether-amine adducts. However, the beneficial effect of such amine derivatives has not been taught to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, in certain embodiments, an alcohol such as n-butanol is present during the reaction to yield adducts that are believed to include amine-aldehyde (e.g., amine-formaldehyde) adducts and amine-aldehyde-alcohol (e.g., amine-formaldehyde-alcohol) adducts.
I.2. Temperature
The amine-aldehyde reaction is known to be temperature dependent, but is not the only variable to effect resulting product composition and properties. For instance, choice of catalyst was also found to have an effect on product composition and properties. Catalysts can be acids or bases. The inventors have found that the nature and concentration of catalyst have been explored in preparing target molecules or fortuitously found to produce unique derivatives. Linear or cyclic (Calixarenes) products of phenol-formaldehyde reactions are representative of cases well know in the art. As depicted in Table 2, the inventors have found that derivatives formed in high temperature reactions (e.g., 4 h reflux) is more active (52 min) than derivatives formed at lower temperature (e.g., 40 min, ˜86° C.). Still, reaction temperature is beneficial to some point. However, when the temperature is raised too high, derivatives had poorer performance.
I.3. Suitable Reagents
Suitable sources of formaldehyde include, without limitation, 37% formaldehyde in water, paraformaldehyde, formaldehyde donors, or mixtures or combinations thereof.
Suitable alcohols include, without limitation, linear or branched alcohols having from one to 20 carbon atoms, where one or more carbon atoms can be replaced by one or more hetero atoms selected from the group consisting of boron, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, sulfur or mixture or combinations thereof and where one or more of the hydrogen atoms can be replaced by one or more single valence atoms selected from the group consisting of fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine or mixtures or combinations thereof. The oxygen replacements can be in the form of ether moieties; the nitrogen replacements can be in the form of tertiary amine or amide moieties.
Suitable amine for use in this invention include, without limitation, primary amines, secondary amines or mixtures or combinations thereof. Exemplary amines include, without limitation, R1R2NH, where R1 and R2 are hydrogen atoms or carbyl groups, where R1 and R2 cannot both be hydrogen. The carbyl groups are groups having between 1 and 20 carbon atoms where one or more carbon atoms can be replaced by one or more hetero atoms selected from the group consisting of boron, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, sulfur or mixture or combinations thereof and where one or more of the hydrogen atoms can be replaced by one or more single valence atoms selected from the group consisting of fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine or mixtures or combinations thereof. The oxygen replacements can be in the form of ether moieties; the nitrogen replacements can be in the form of tertiary amine or amide moieties.
Noxious sulfur species include, without limitation, all sulfur containing compounds that cause gas or oil to be sour. Exemplary examples including hydrogen sulfide (H2S), low molecular weight thiols (RSH, where R is a carbyl groups having between 1 and about 6 carbon atoms or equivalents thereof). Sulfur scavengers react with these sulfur species to form high molecular weight sulfur containing compounds having reduced volatility and reduced harmful properties toward metals and other downstream equipment, e.g., pipelines, separators, strippers, refinery equipment, etc.
II. Process Development
Understanding reaction progress and when to halt reaction is of considerable economic importance and the ability to reproducibly manufacture a product is equally important. To gain insight into the progression of formylation of N,N-dibutylamine (DBA), a representative example of an amine-aldehyde adduct sulfur scavenger, the process was monitored and a quality control method was developed on the basis of changes observed in physical properties during the reaction.
II.1. Reaction Progress
Upon the realization that different formylated products are obtainable overtime and at different reaction temperatures, attempts were made to monitor reaction progress using chromatography. A GC/MS method was chosen for the analysis of liquid formylation products. Referring now to
Using the chromatogram as a reference, aliquots of various reactions at scheduled times were probed. Consequently, optimum temperature, reaction time and target formulation were established for a 1 to 2 amine to formaldehyde product. Referring to
Albeit, running a GC/MS in the course of a reaction process for the prime purpose of proper reaction termination point is risky. The risk here is associated with transformation of a desirable formulation into an undesirable formulation (referred to as “excessive transformation” as shown in
II.2. Quality Control
In order to minimize the risk of losing a reaction batch because of “excessive reaction” (
II.3. Specific Gravity
Specific gravity was tested as a product quality control metric by measuring the specific gravity of aliquots withdrawn from the reaction at time intervals between 30 min or 1 h after all the paraformaldehyde had dissolved or the optimal reaction temperature of between about 86° C. and about 96° C. (about 170° F. and about 200° F.) was attained. The resulting measured specific gravities are tabulated in Table 3.
1[DBA]: Concentration of N,N-Dibutylamine, DBA.
2[FM]: Concentration of Formaldehyde, FM.
3Corrected
Then, a reaction of the 1:2 ratio formaldehyde product was carried out, with aliquots of the reaction at different reaction times were withdrawn and their corresponding specific gravity (SG) and GC/MS chromatograms were recorded. The specific gravity data are tabulated in Table 4 and graphed in
SG and sulfur scavenging effectiveness data for pilot plant runs and the timed run 1 compared to the top performing formulation VI and the standard formulation IV are tabulated in Table 5). The data demonstrated conclusively that specific gravity is a dependable method for following the reaction and for quality control of resultant product.
In light of the 100% efficiency of the standard formula, IV, a SG of between 0.8280 and 0.8600 is a metric for producing product embodiments with generally optimized scavenging activities. The inventors have found that SG is an ideal primary QC standard or measure, while in certain embodiments, MS/GC represents a secondary QC measure, where the desirable products show a primary sharp peak with a trailing shoulder at about 26 minutes in the MS/CG chromatogram.
1Corrected
IV. Pilot Plant Glass Reactor Unit Process
To a 55 gallon reactor, add paraformaldehyde (76.71 lb), N,N-dibutyl amine (166 lb) and n-butanol (29.74 lb). Upon agitation, initial reaction temperature reached about 65° C. Then, reaction temperature was gradually raised to 90° C. and maintained at a temperature between about 90° C. and about 92° C. with intermittent cooling/heating as needed. Pressure was also maintained under 50 psi by venting reactor to scrubber. Samples were collected at 30 min interval and corresponding specific gravity (SG) and density determined. Reaction was stopped when SG of adduct measured 0.8422 and 1.3 times more effective scavenging capacity than the standard, IV (see lot samples SA09080804 and SA09080805 in
All references cited herein are incorporated by reference. Although the invention has been disclosed with reference to its preferred embodiments, from reading this description those of skill in the art may appreciate changes and modification that may be made which do not depart from the scope and spirit of the invention as described above and claimed hereafter.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2196042 | Timpson | Apr 1940 | A |
| 2390153 | Kern | Dec 1945 | A |
| 3059909 | Wise | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3163219 | Wyant et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3301723 | Chrisp | Jan 1967 | A |
| 3301848 | Halleck | Jan 1967 | A |
| 3303896 | Tillotson et al. | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3317430 | Priestley et al. | May 1967 | A |
| 3565176 | Wittenwyler | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3856921 | Shrier et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3888312 | Tiner et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3933205 | Kiel | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3937283 | Blauer et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3960736 | Free et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3965982 | Medlin | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3990978 | Hill | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4007792 | Meister | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4052159 | Fuerst et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4067389 | Savins | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4108782 | Thompson | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4112050 | Sartori et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4112051 | Sartori et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4112052 | Sartori et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4113631 | Thompson | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4378845 | Medlin et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4461716 | Barbarin et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4479041 | Fenwick et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4506734 | Nolte | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4514309 | Wadhwa | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4541935 | Constien et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4549608 | Stowe et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4561985 | Glass, Jr. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4623021 | Stowe | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4654266 | Kachnik | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4657081 | Hodge | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4660643 | Perkins | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4683068 | Kucera | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4686052 | Baranet et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4695389 | Kubala | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4705113 | Perkins | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4714115 | Uhri | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4718490 | Uhri | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4724905 | Uhri | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4725372 | Teot et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4739834 | Peiffer et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4741401 | Walles et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4748011 | Baize | May 1988 | A |
| 4779680 | Sydansk | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4795574 | Syrinek et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4817717 | Jennings, Jr. et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4830106 | Uhri | May 1989 | A |
| 4846277 | Khalil et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4848468 | Hazlett et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4852650 | Jennings, Jr. et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4869322 | Vogt, Jr. et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4892147 | Jennings, Jr. et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4926940 | Stromswold | May 1990 | A |
| 4938286 | Jennings, Jr. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4978512 | Dillon | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5005645 | Jennings, Jr. et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5024276 | Borchardt | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5030762 | Brake | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5067556 | Fudono et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5074359 | Schmidt | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5074991 | Weers | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5082579 | Dawson | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5106518 | Cooney et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5110486 | Manalastas et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5169411 | Weers | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5224546 | Smith et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5228510 | Jennings, Jr. et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5246073 | Sandiford et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5259455 | Nimerick et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5330005 | Card et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5342530 | Aften et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5347004 | Rivers et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5363919 | Jennings, Jr. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5402846 | Jennings, Jr. et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5411091 | Jennings, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
| 5424284 | Patel et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5439055 | Card et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5462721 | Pounds et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5465792 | Dawson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5472049 | Chaffe et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5482116 | El-Rabaa et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5488083 | Kinsey, III et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5497831 | Hainey et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5501275 | Card et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5551516 | Norman et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5624886 | Dawson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5635458 | Lee et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5649596 | Jones et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5669447 | Walker et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5674377 | Sullivan, III et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5688478 | Pounds et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5693837 | Smith et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5711396 | Joerg et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5722490 | Ebinger | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5744024 | Sullivan, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5755286 | Ebinger | May 1998 | A |
| 5775425 | Weaver et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5787986 | Weaver et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5806597 | Tjon-Joe-Pin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5807812 | Smith et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5833000 | Weaver et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5853048 | Weaver et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5871049 | Weaver et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5877127 | Card et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5908073 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5908814 | Patel et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5964295 | Brown et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5979557 | Card et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980845 | Cherry | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6016871 | Burts, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6035936 | Whalen | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6047772 | Weaver et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6054417 | Graham et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6059034 | Rickards et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6060436 | Snyder et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6069118 | Hinkel et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6123394 | Jeffrey | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6133205 | Jones | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6147034 | Jones et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6162449 | Maier et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6162766 | Muir et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169058 | Le et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6228812 | Dawson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6247543 | Patel et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6267938 | Warrender et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6283212 | Hinkel et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6291405 | Lee et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6330916 | Rickards et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6725931 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6756345 | Pakulski et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6793018 | Dawson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6832650 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6875728 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7140433 | Gatlin et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7268100 | Kippie et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7350579 | Gatlin et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 20020049256 | Bergeron, Jr. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165308 | Kinniard et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030220204 | Baran, Jr. et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20050045330 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050092489 | Welton et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137114 | Gatlin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050153846 | Gatlin | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050250666 | Gatlin et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060194700 | Gatlin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070032693 | Gatlin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070129257 | Kippie et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070131425 | Gatlin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070173413 | Lukocs et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070173414 | Wilson, Jr. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20080039345 | Kippie et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2007965 | Aug 1990 | CA |
| 2125513 | Jan 1995 | CA |
| 4027300 | Mar 1992 | DE |
| 0730018 | Sep 1996 | EP |
| 775376 | May 1957 | GB |
| 816337 | Jul 1959 | GB |
| 1073338 | Jun 1967 | GB |
| 08151422 | Jun 1996 | JP |
| 10001461 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| 10110115 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| 2005194148 | Jul 2005 | JP |
| WO 9819774 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 9856497 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100197968 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |
