Alien crosstalk suppression with enhanced patch cord

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9601239
  • Patent Number
    9,601,239
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 24, 2015
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 21, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods for decreasing alien crosstalk use enhanced patch cords for introducing additional attenuation. The enhanced patch cords are preferably shielded to reduce alien crosstalk down their lengths and also attenuate signals passing therethrough to a greater extent than standard communication patch cords. The interaction of two enhanced patch cords results in two suppression steps for alien crosstalk and only one suppression step for intended signal passing through a communication cable.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to communications systems and more specifically relates to systems and methods for suppressing alien crosstalk in communications.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Suppression of crosstalk in communication systems is an increasingly important practice for improving systems' reliability and the quality of communication. As the bandwidth of a communication systems increases, so does the importance of reducing or eliminating signal crosstalk.


In wired communication systems, crosstalk is caused by electromagnetic interference within a communication cable or between multiple cables. Crosstalk resulting from interaction between cables is known as alien crosstalk.


While crosstalk resulting from signals running within a single cable interfering with signals within the same cable can be managed using electronic crosstalk reduction methods, alien crosstalk poses additional problems because the qualities of the interfering or disturbing signal(s) are not known. Alien crosstalk has proven problematic in implementations such as 10 Gbps Ethernet communication over an installed base of Cat 6 or Cat 5e cable. In such cables, alien crosstalk can significantly hamper communication performance. Specially-designed cabling could be used to decrease alien crosstalk, but replacing existing cabling with newly-designed cabling entails significant expense.


Thus, there exists a need for alien crosstalk suppression methods and systems that may be used with installed cable.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to one embodiment of the present invention, an improved patch cord having increased attenuation improves performance of an installed cabling system.


According to another embodiment of the present invention, alien crosstalk between communication cables is decreased by a method of using attenuating patch cables connected to the communication cables.


According to another embodiment of the present invention, cabling systems employ an improved patch cord to decrease alien crosstalk between communication cables.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a plan view of a communication system according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a cabling installation with improved patch cords for providing alien crosstalk suppression;



FIG. 3 is a graph showing the increased signal-to-noise ratio in a communication system using an enhanced patch cord according to the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view showing a conductor and lossy conductor insulation according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of stranded wires having a lossy conductive coating;



FIG. 6 is a detail view of the detail “A” of FIG. 5;



FIGS. 7a and 7b are cross-sectional views showing the comparison of two cable pairs, with the cable pair of FIG. 7b having increased distance between crosstalk pairs;



FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of a cable having a surrounding shield;



FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of a cable having a modified surrounding shield;



FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of a cable having shielding surrounding each wire pair;



FIG. 11 is a cross-sectional view of a cable having a conductive spline;



FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating varying cable lays along the length of a cable.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENTS

Turning now to FIG. 1, a communication system 10 is shown. In the communication system 10, a network device such as the 10 Gb/s Ethernet switch 12 is connected to a plurality of devices, such as personal computers (“PCs”) 14 and 16 by first and second communication cables 18 and 20, respectively. It is to be understood that while FIG. 1 shows the communication cables 18 and 20 extending from a single network device to two devices, systems and methods according to the present invention will allow for the suppression of alien crosstalk between communication cables regardless of the types of devices to which the cables are connected.


Generally, alien crosstalk resulting from the interaction between the communication cables 18 and 20 will be coupled along the entire lengths of the cables 18 and 20. The cables 18 and 20 act to suppress signal travelling through them to some degree, such that alien crosstalk occurring between the cables closer to the Ethernet switch 12 will be attenuated somewhat at the PCs 14 and 16.


Crosstalk suppression is enhanced in the system of FIG. 1 by the use of first and second enhanced patch cords 22 and 24. The enhanced patch cords 22 and 24 are designed to suppress crosstalk along their lengths, for example by providing additional shielding. In addition, the enhanced patch cords 22 and 24 attenuate communications signals and noise, such as crosstalk, travelling through them. Attenuation in the patch cords 22 and 24 may be accomplished in a number of ways. For example, attenuation may be increased by the use of finer-gauge wire within the enhanced patch cords 22 and 24 or by increasing the number of twists per inch in wires contained within the patch cords 22 and 24.


The strength of alien crosstalk is dependent upon the strength of the interfering or disturbing signal. Thus, increased attenuation provided by the first enhanced patch cord 22 will reduce the signal level in the first communication cable 18. As a result, the alien crosstalk coupled into the second communication cable 20 from the first communication cable will be reduced due to attenuation by the first enhanced patch cord 22. Because the alien crosstalk caused by the first communication cable 18 in the second communication cable 20 will travel in both directions in the second communication cable 20, the alien crosstalk will also be subjected to suppression in the second enhanced patch cord 24.


For example, if a signal leaves the Ethernet switch 12 having a signal strength of 1 volt peak-to-peak, and the first enhanced patch cord 22 attenuates to 10% of the initial strength, the signal going from the Ethernet switch 12 to the first PC 14 will have a signal strength of 0.1 volt peak-to-peak. If 10% of that signal couples as alien crosstalk to the second communication cable 20, the alien crosstalk in the second cable will have a signal strength of 0.01 volt peak-to-peak. If the second enhanced patch cord 24 also has attenuating properties that reduce signals to 10% of the initial strength, the alien crosstalk will be suppressed in the second communication cable 20 to 0.001 volt peak-to-peak. Thus, the alien crosstalk has been subjected to the effects of two enhanced patch cords 22 and 24, and the signal from the Ethernet switch 12 through the second communication cable 20 has been subjected only to the effects of the second enhanced patch cord 24. Optional enhanced patch cords 26 have been shown for connection to the PCs 14 and 16 and similarly operate to reduce alien crosstalk at the user side of the communication connection.


Enhanced patch cords according to the present invention may be integrated into a number of connections, as shown by FIG. 2, in which a horizontal cable plant 28 having multiple cables is enhanced by enhanced patch cords 30 and 32 provided at first and second ends of the communication path.


The enhancement of signal-to-noise ratio using enhanced patch cords according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 3. The dotted line shows the reduced signal and noise resulting from the enhanced patch cords across the communication frequencies. Because the noise due to alien crosstalk is attenuated to a greater degree than the signal, both the available bandwidth and the signal-to-noise ratio are improved in systems employing enhanced patch cords according to the present invention.


Attenuation may be introduced into patch cords and other communication cabling using a variety of methods. There are two design parameters to consider in the design of a lossy patch cord. One parameter is the amount of insertion loss to include in the cable, and the second is the amount of alien crosstalk suppression or susceptibility to have in the cable. Both parameters are preferably addressed in a cable design.


Dielectric loss may be increased as shown in FIG. 4 by providing a conductor 34 within lossy conductor insulation 36 or 38. Dielectric loss can also be increased by using such methods as: (a) cable jacket dielectric lossy material; (b) cable spline dielectric lossy material; and (c) a wire pair shield (which concentrates the E&M field through the wire insulation).


The use of a less conductive wire (for example, aluminum wire instead of copper wire) will also increase conductor loss. As mentioned above, conductor loss can also be increased by decreasing the conductor wire diameter or increasing the twist per unit length. Increasing the amount of twisting increases the effective length of the cord and hence increases the conductor loss.


Conductor loss can also be increased by “tinning” a metal wire. A less-conductive coating on the circumference of the wire will increase the conductor loss because the current density congregates near the surface (via the skin effect) and will experience a higher loss through the tinned material. The use of stranded wire can also increase conductor loss, with an increase of loss by roughly 20% for comparable wire gauges. FIG. 5 shows a cross-sectional view of a cable 40 employing tinning and stranded wire. In the embodiment of FIG. 5, stranded copper conductors 42 are provided within a tin skin 44. FIG. 6 is a detail view of the detail “A” of FIG. 5. The skin is provided at a depth ds.


The use of wire with a roughened surface can also increase the conductor loss through the wire.



FIGS. 7a and 7b illustrate a technique to decrease the susceptibility of a cable by increasing the physical distance between crosstalk pairs. First and second cables 46 and 48 are placed in an abutting relationship. When the cable jacket material 50 is increased in thickness—for example, to jacket 52, as shown in FIG. 7b—the distance between crosstalk pairs is increased from d1 shown in FIG. 7a to d2 shown in FIG. 7b. According to one embodiment, the cable jacket material 50 is a foamed jacket material. Cable separators may also be used to increase separation between neighboring cables.


Metallic shielding can also be used to reduce susceptibility of alien signals into a signal cable pair. FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view showing a technique to decrease the susceptibility of a cable by the incorporation of a conductive shield. In FIG. 8, conductive pairs 52 are provided within an overall conductive shield 54. The conductive shield 54, in turn, is provided within a jacket 56. As shown in FIG. 9 (which incorporates a detail view), in another embodiment a layer of overall shielding 54 may be provided between first and second layers 58 and 60 of jacketing material.



FIG. 10 shows another embodiment, in which individual shielding 62 surrounds each wire pair.


Another embodiment is shown in FIG. 11, which illustrates the use of a conductive spline 64 or conductive pair separator used to decrease susceptibility.


In another embodiment, crosstalk may be reduced by modifying the lay of a cable along its length. The lay of a cable refers to the twisting of a cable along its length. In this embodiment, fixed twisted pair lengths are provided along the length of a cable. Four or more cable lay values providing a four-pair cable with twisted pair lengths over the length of the cable meeting the proposed 10 Gb/s Ethernet Near-End Crosstalk (NEXT) requirement are selected. Any four or more cable lay values are chosen at random, with the selection process being described as follows:


1. Cable lays A, B, C, D, . . . ) are selected, with each of the lays meeting the 10 Gb/s Ethernet NEXT requirement.


2. Any of the four cable lays are selected without replacement during the cable lay process.


3. The selected cable lay is provided over a uniform or random length of cable less than or equal to ten meters.


4. Any of the three or more remaining cable lays are selected and applied, to the cable construction as described in step 3.


5. The process is repeated until all cable lays have been assigned.


A diagram of a cable length employing random distances between cable lay transitions and using four different cable lays is shown in FIG. 12.


While particular embodiments and applications of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations may be apparent from the foregoing descriptions without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A communication cable comprising a plurality of twisted pairs wherein at least one twisted pair of the plurality of twisted pairs has a first cable lay over a first length of the cable, a second cable lay over a second length of the cable, and a third cable lay over a third length of the cable and further wherein the first, second, and third cable lays are not equal and are all selected from a finite list of cable lay values.
  • 2. The communication cable of claim 1 further comprising a fourth cable lay over a fourth length of the cable, the fourth cable lay not being equal to the first, second, or third cable lay.
  • 3. The communication cable of claim 2 wherein the lengths are equal to ten meters or less.
  • 4. The communication cable of claim 1 wherein the first second and third lengths vary randomly.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/539,947, filed Jul. 2, 2012; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/788,891, filed May 27, 2010, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,217,268 on Jul. 10, 2012; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/468,848, filed Aug. 31, 2006, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,728,228 on Jun. 1, 2010; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/887,718 filed Jul. 9, 2004, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,109,424 on Sep. 19, 2006; which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/486,683, entitled “Alien Crosstalk Suppression with Enhanced Patch Cord Design,” filed on Jul. 11, 2003; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/488,566, entitled “Alien Crosstalk Suppression With Enhanced Patch Cord,” filed on Jul. 18, 2003; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/565,464, entitled “Alien Crosstalk Suppression with Enhanced Patch Cord,” filed on Apr. 26, 2004. These provisional applications are further incorporated herein in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (152)
Number Name Date Kind
483285 Guilleaume Sep 1892 A
1883269 Yonkers Oct 1932 A
1976847 Gordon et al. Oct 1934 A
2125869 Atkinson Aug 1938 A
2455773 Johnson Dec 1948 A
2538019 Lee Jan 1951 A
2583026 Swift Jan 1952 A
RE24154 Krueger May 1956 E
2804494 Fenton Aug 1957 A
2847499 Peterson Aug 1958 A
3005739 Lang et al. Oct 1961 A
3086557 Peterson Apr 1963 A
3102160 Glaze Aug 1963 A
3131469 Gilmore May 1964 A
3622683 Roberts et al. Nov 1971 A
3649434 Mortenson Mar 1972 A
3649744 Coleman Mar 1972 A
3650862 Burr Mar 1972 A
3715458 Bayes et al. Feb 1973 A
3761842 Gandrud Sep 1973 A
3803340 Jachimowicz et al. Apr 1974 A
3881052 Britz et al. Apr 1975 A
3885380 Hacker May 1975 A
3911200 Simons et al. Oct 1975 A
3921381 Vogelsberg Nov 1975 A
4010213 Naegeli Mar 1977 A
4034148 Lang Jul 1977 A
4041237 Stine et al. Aug 1977 A
4081602 Paniri et al. Mar 1978 A
4085284 Olszewski et al. Apr 1978 A
4102117 Dornberger Jul 1978 A
4131690 Jukes et al. Dec 1978 A
4165442 Gabriel et al. Aug 1979 A
4218581 Suzuki Aug 1980 A
4234759 Harlow Nov 1980 A
4319940 Arroyo et al. Mar 1982 A
4340771 Watts Jul 1982 A
4356345 Gonia Oct 1982 A
4368214 Gillette Jan 1983 A
4393582 Arnold, Jr. et al. Jul 1983 A
4394705 Blachman Jul 1983 A
4412094 Dougherty et al. Oct 1983 A
4449012 Voser May 1984 A
4453031 Justiss Jun 1984 A
4467138 Brorein Aug 1984 A
4468089 Brorein Aug 1984 A
4481379 Bolick, Jr. et al. Nov 1984 A
4486619 Trine et al. Dec 1984 A
4487992 Tomita Dec 1984 A
4500748 Klein Feb 1985 A
4515993 MacKenzie May 1985 A
4541980 Kiersarsky et al. Sep 1985 A
4550559 Thomson Nov 1985 A
4588852 Fetterolf et al. May 1986 A
4595793 Arroyo et al. Jun 1986 A
4605818 Arroyo et al. Aug 1986 A
4697051 Beggs et al. Sep 1987 A
4711811 Randa Dec 1987 A
4755629 Beggs et al. Jul 1988 A
4767890 Magnan Aug 1988 A
4777325 Siwinski Oct 1988 A
4800236 Lemke Jan 1989 A
4873393 Friesen et al. Oct 1989 A
4933513 Lee Jun 1990 A
4941729 Hardin et al. Jul 1990 A
4963609 Anderson et al. Oct 1990 A
5010210 Sidi et al. Apr 1991 A
5015800 Vaupotic et al. May 1991 A
5103067 Aldissi Apr 1992 A
5132488 Tessier et al. Jul 1992 A
5142100 Vaupotic Aug 1992 A
5162609 Adriaenssens et al. Nov 1992 A
5202946 Hardin et al. Apr 1993 A
5205762 Carney Apr 1993 A
5245134 Vana, Jr. et al. Sep 1993 A
5253317 Allen et al. Oct 1993 A
5283390 Hubis et al. Feb 1994 A
5286923 Prudhon et al. Feb 1994 A
5298680 Kenny Mar 1994 A
5342991 Xu et al. Aug 1994 A
5367971 Carpenter et al. Nov 1994 A
5376758 Kimber Dec 1994 A
5393933 Goertz Feb 1995 A
5399813 McNeill et al. Mar 1995 A
5401908 Rodeghero Mar 1995 A
5424491 Walling et al. Jun 1995 A
5434354 Baker et al. Jul 1995 A
5448669 Dunn et al. Sep 1995 A
5493071 Newmoyer Feb 1996 A
5514837 Kenny et al. May 1996 A
5525757 O'Brien Jun 1996 A
5541361 Friesen et al. Jul 1996 A
5544270 Clark et al. Aug 1996 A
5574250 Hardie et al. Nov 1996 A
5606151 Siekierka et al. Feb 1997 A
5734126 Siekierka et al. Mar 1998 A
5742002 Arredondo et al. Apr 1998 A
5744757 Kenny et al. Apr 1998 A
5767441 Brorein et al. Jun 1998 A
5770820 Nelson et al. Jun 1998 A
5789711 Gaeris et al. Aug 1998 A
5834697 Baker et al. Nov 1998 A
5900588 Springer et al. May 1999 A
5932847 Mayfield Aug 1999 A
5936205 Newmoyer Aug 1999 A
5944535 Bullivant et al. Aug 1999 A
5952607 Friesen et al. Sep 1999 A
5952615 Prudhon Sep 1999 A
5956445 Deitz, Sr. et al. Sep 1999 A
5969295 Boucino et al. Oct 1999 A
5990419 Bogese, II Nov 1999 A
6037546 Mottine et al. Mar 2000 A
6066799 Nugent May 2000 A
6101305 Wagman et al. Aug 2000 A
6153826 Kenny et al. Nov 2000 A
6194663 Friesen et al. Feb 2001 B1
6211467 Berelsman et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222129 Siekierka et al. Apr 2001 B1
6248954 Clark et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255593 Reede Jul 2001 B1
6285653 Koeman et al. Sep 2001 B1
6288340 Arnould Sep 2001 B1
6318062 Doherty Nov 2001 B1
6323427 Rutledge Nov 2001 B1
6353177 Young Mar 2002 B1
6433272 Buhler et al. Aug 2002 B1
6452105 Badii et al. Sep 2002 B2
6465737 Bonato et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476326 Fuzier et al. Nov 2002 B1
6506976 Neveux, Jr. Jan 2003 B1
6534715 Maunder et al. Mar 2003 B1
6545222 Yokokawa et al. Apr 2003 B2
6566605 Prudhon May 2003 B1
6566607 Walling May 2003 B1
6570095 Clark et al. May 2003 B2
6573456 Spruell et al. Jun 2003 B2
6618774 Dickens et al. Sep 2003 B1
6624359 Bahlmann et al. Sep 2003 B2
6639152 Glew et al. Oct 2003 B2
6743983 Wiekhorst et al. Jun 2004 B2
6770819 Patel Aug 2004 B2
6812408 Clark et al. Nov 2004 B2
6998537 Clark et al. Feb 2006 B2
7109424 Nordin et al. Sep 2006 B2
7214880 Wiekhorst et al. May 2007 B2
7382375 Ford et al. Jun 2008 B2
7728228 Nordin et al. Jun 2010 B2
8217268 Nordin Jul 2012 B2
20020079126 Valenzuela Jun 2002 A1
20030106704 Isley et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030121695 Wiebelhaus et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040118593 Augustine et al. Jun 2004 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
1185630 Jun 1998 CN
1250276 Apr 2000 CN
697378 Oct 1940 DE
0302162 Aug 1989 EP
694100 Nov 1930 FR
147264 Jul 1920 GB
977833 Dec 1964 GB
1390152 Apr 1975 GB
06349344 Dec 1994 JP
H07134917 May 1995 JP
H10308125 Nov 1998 JP
2002354114 Dec 2002 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (10)
Entry
Testing Local Area Network Cabling for High Speed Communications; Henriecus Koeman, Fluke Corporation; ISBN# 0/-803-3277-6; 6 pages.
Premises Wiring Gets the Standard Treatment; Data Communications International; 10 pages; Nov. 1992.
Commercial Building Telecommunications Cabling Standard; TIA/EIA Standard; 92 pages; Oct. 6, 1995.
Patch Cord Information Sheet; Anixter International; 2 pages; Jul. 22, 2002.
AMP Netconnect Category 6 Cable 219560-X, 219567-X Specification Sheet; Tyco Electronics; 2 pages; May 2001.
Alien Crosstalk Measurements; IEEE802.3 Interim 10GBASE-T; Larry Cohen; Solarflare Communications; 12 pages; Jan. 2003.
Structure Cabling Systems Catalog; Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.; 141 pages; 2001.
Amp Netconnect Catalog; Tyco Electronics; 220 pages; 2001.
Systimax® Structured Connectivity Solutions Hot Products Ordering Guide; Avaya Communications; 68 pages; 2001.
Delivery Systems Product Guide; Hubbell Wiring Systems; 180 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150332808 A1 Nov 2015 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
60565464 Apr 2004 US
60488566 Jul 2003 US
60486683 Jul 2003 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 13539947 Jul 2012 US
Child 14808323 US
Parent 12788891 May 2010 US
Child 13539947 US
Parent 11468848 Aug 2006 US
Child 12788891 US
Parent 10887718 Jul 2004 US
Child 11468848 US