The present invention relates generally to communications systems and more specifically relates to systems and methods for suppressing alien crosstalk in communications.
Suppression of crosstalk in communication systems is an increasingly important practice for improving systems' reliability and the quality of communication. As the bandwidth of a communication systems increases, so does the importance of reducing or eliminating signal crosstalk.
In wired communication systems, crosstalk is caused by electromagnetic interference within a communication cable or between multiple cables. Crosstalk resulting from interaction between cables is known as alien crosstalk.
While crosstalk resulting from signals running within a single cable interfering with signals within the same cable can be managed using electronic crosstalk reduction methods, alien crosstalk poses additional problems because the qualities of the interfering or disturbing signal(s) are not known. Alien crosstalk has proven problematic in implementations such as 10 Gbps Ethernet communication over an installed base of Cat 6 or Cat 5e cable. In such cables, alien crosstalk can significantly hamper communication performance. Specially-designed cabling could be used to decrease alien crosstalk, but replacing existing cabling with newly-designed cabling entails significant expense.
Thus, there exists a need for alien crosstalk suppression methods and systems that may be used with installed cable.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, an improved patch cord having increased attenuation improves performance of an installed cabling system.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, alien crosstalk between communication cables is decreased by a method of using attenuating patch cables connected to the communication cables.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, cabling systems employ an improved patch cord to decrease alien crosstalk between communication cables.
a and 7b are cross-sectional views showing the comparison of two cable pairs, with the cable pair of
Turning now to
Generally, alien crosstalk resulting from the interaction between the communication cables 18 and 20 will be coupled along the entire lengths of the cables 18 and 20. The cables 18 and 20 act to suppress signal travelling through them to some degree, such that alien crosstalk occurring between the cables closer to the Ethernet switch 12 will be attenuated somewhat at the PCs 14 and 16.
Crosstalk suppression is enhanced in the system of
The strength of alien crosstalk is dependent upon the strength of the interfering or disturbing signal. Thus, increased attenuation provided by the first enhanced patch cord 22 will reduce the signal level in the first communication cable 18. As a result, the alien crosstalk coupled into the second communication cable 20 from the first communication cable will be reduced due to attenuation by the first enhanced patch cord 22. Because the alien crosstalk caused by the first communication cable 18 in the second communication cable 20 will travel in both directions in the second communication cable 20, the alien crosstalk will also be subjected to suppression in the second enhanced patch cord 24.
For example, if a signal leaves the Ethernet switch 12 having a signal strength of 1 volt peak-to-peak, and the first enhanced patch cord 22 attenuates to 10% of the initial strength, the signal going from the Ethernet switch 12 to the first PC 14 will have a signal strength of 0.1 volt peak-to-peak. If 10% of that signal couples as alien crosstalk to the second communication cable 20, the alien crosstalk in the second cable will have a signal strength of 0.01 volt peak-to-peak. If the second enhanced patch cord 24 also has attenuating properties that reduce signals to 10% of the initial strength, the alien crosstalk will be suppressed in the second communication cable 20 to 0.001 volt peak-to-peak. Thus, the alien crosstalk has been subjected to the effects of two enhanced patch cords 22 and 24, and the signal from the Ethernet switch 12 through the second communication cable 20 has been subjected only to the effects of the second enhanced patch cord 24. Optional enhanced patch cords 26 have been shown for connection to the PCs 14 and 16 and similarly operate to reduce alien crosstalk at the user side of the communication connection.
Enhanced patch cords according to the present invention may be integrated into a number of connections, as shown by
The enhancement of signal-to-noise ratio using enhanced patch cords according to the present invention is shown in
Attenuation may be introduced into patch cords and other communication cabling using a variety of methods. There are two design parameters to consider in the design of a lossy patch cord. One parameter is the amount of insertion loss to include in the cable, and the second is the amount of alien crosstalk suppression or susceptibility to have in the cable. Both parameters are preferably addressed in a cable design.
Dielectric loss may be increased as shown in
The use of a less conductive wire (for example, aluminum wire instead of copper wire) will also increase conductor loss. As mentioned above, conductor loss can also be increased by decreasing the conductor wire diameter or increasing the twist per unit length. Increasing the amount of twisting increases the effective length of the cord and hence increases the conductor loss.
Conductor loss can also be increased by “tinning” a metal wire. A less-conductive coating on the circumference of the wire will increase the conductor loss because the current density congregates near the surface (via the skin effect) and will experience a higher loss through the tinned material. The use of stranded wire can also increase conductor loss, with an increase of loss by roughly 20% for comparable wire gauges.
The use of wire with a roughened surface can also increase the conductor loss through the wire.
a and 7b illustrate a technique to decrease the susceptibility of a cable by increasing the physical distance between crosstalk pairs. First and second cables 46 and 48 are placed in an abutting relationship. When the cable jacket material 50 is increased in thickness—for example, to jacket 52, as shown in
Metallic shielding can also be used to reduce susceptibility of alien signals into a signal cable pair.
Another embodiment is shown in
In another embodiment, crosstalk may be reduced by modifying the lay of a cable along its length. The lay of a cable refers to the twisting of a cable along its length. In this embodiment, fixed twisted pair lengths are provided along the length of a cable. Four or more cable lay values providing a four-pair cable with twisted pair lengths over the length of the cable meeting the proposed 10 Gb/s Ethernet Near-End Crosstalk (NEXT) requirement are selected. Any four or more cable lay values are chosen at random, with the selection process being described as follows:
1. Cable lays (A, B, C, D, . . . ) are selected, with each of the lays meeting the 10 Gb/s Ethernet NEXT requirement.
2. Any of the four cable lays are selected without replacement during the cable lay process.
3. The selected cable lay is provided over a uniform or random length of cable less than or equal to ten meters.
4. Any of the three or more remaining cable lays are selected and applied to the cable construction as described in step 3.
5. The process is repeated until all cable lays have been assigned.
A diagram of a cable length employing random distances between cable lay transitions and using four different cable lays is shown in
While particular embodiments and applications of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations may be apparent from the foregoing descriptions without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/887,718 filed Jul. 9, 2004 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/486,683, entitled “Alien Crosstalk Suppression with Enhanced Patch Cord Design,” filed on Jul. 11, 2003; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/488,566, entitled “Alien Crosstalk Suppression With Enhanced Patch Cord,” filed on Jul. 18, 2003; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/565,464, entitled “Alien Crosstalk Suppression with Enhanced Patch Cord,” filed on Apr. 26, 2004. These provisional applications are further incorporated herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
483285 | Guilleaume | Sep 1892 | A |
1883269 | Yonkers | Oct 1932 | A |
1976847 | Gordon at al. | Oct 1934 | A |
2125869 | Atkinson | Aug 1938 | A |
2455773 | Johnson | Dec 1948 | A |
2538019 | Lee | Jan 1951 | A |
2583026 | Swift | Jan 1952 | A |
RE24154 | Krueger | May 1956 | E |
2804494 | Fenton | Aug 1957 | A |
2847499 | Peterson | Aug 1958 | A |
3005739 | Lang et al. | Oct 1961 | A |
3086557 | Peterson | Apr 1963 | A |
3102160 | Cook at al. | Aug 1963 | A |
3131469 | Glaze | May 1964 | A |
3234722 | Gilmore | Feb 1966 | A |
4165442 | Gabriel et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3622683 | Mortenson | Nov 1971 | A |
3649434 | Mortenson | Mar 1972 | A |
3649744 | Coleman | Mar 1972 | A |
3650862 | Burr | Mar 1972 | A |
3715458 | Bayes at al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3761842 | Gandrud | Sep 1973 | A |
3803340 | Jachimowicz et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3881052 | Britz et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3911200 | Simons et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3921381 | Vogelsberg | Nov 1975 | A |
4010213 | Naegeli | Mar 1977 | A |
4034148 | Lang | Jul 1977 | A |
4041237 | Stine et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4081602 | Paniri et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4085284 | Olszewski et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4131690 | Jukes et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4218581 | Suzuki | Aug 1980 | A |
4234759 | Harlow | Nov 1980 | A |
4319940 | Arroyo et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4340771 | Watts | Jul 1982 | A |
4356345 | Gonia | Oct 1982 | A |
4368214 | Gillette | Jan 1983 | A |
4393582 | Arnold, Jr. et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4394705 | Blachman | Jul 1983 | A |
4412094 | Dougherty et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4449012 | Voser | May 1984 | A |
4453031 | Justiss | Jun 1984 | A |
4467138 | Brorein | Aug 1984 | A |
4468089 | Brorein | Aug 1984 | A |
4481379 | Bolick, Jr. et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4486619 | Trine et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4487992 | Tomita | Dec 1984 | A |
4500748 | Klein | Feb 1985 | A |
4515993 | MacKenzie | May 1985 | A |
4541980 | Kiersarsky et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4550559 | Thomson | Nov 1985 | A |
4588852 | Fetterolf et al. | May 1986 | A |
4595793 | Arroyo et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4605818 | Arroyo et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4697051 | Beggs et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4711811 | Randa | Dec 1987 | A |
4755629 | Beggs et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4767890 | Magnan | Aug 1988 | A |
4777325 | Siwinski | Oct 1988 | A |
4800236 | Lemke | Jan 1989 | A |
4873393 | Friesen et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4933513 | Lee | Jun 1990 | A |
4941729 | Hardin et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4963609 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5010210 | Sidi et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5015800 | Vaupotic et al. | May 1991 | A |
5103067 | Aldissi | Apr 1992 | A |
5132488 | Tessier et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5142100 | Vaupotic | Aug 1992 | A |
5162609 | Adriaenssens et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5202946 | Hardin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5245134 | Vana, Jr. et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253317 | Allen et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5283390 | Hubis et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5286923 | Prudhon et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5298680 | Kenny | Mar 1994 | A |
5342991 | Xu et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5367971 | Carpenter et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5376758 | Kimber | Dec 1994 | A |
5393933 | Goertz | Feb 1995 | A |
5399813 | McNeill et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5401908 | Rodeghero | Mar 1995 | A |
5424491 | Walling et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5434354 | Baker et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5448669 | Dunn et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5493071 | Newmoyer | Feb 1996 | A |
5514837 | Kenny et al. | May 1996 | A |
5525757 | O'Brien | Jun 1996 | A |
5541361 | Friesen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544270 | Clark et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5574250 | Hardie et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5606151 | Siekierka et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5734126 | Siekierka et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742002 | Arredondo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744757 | Kenny et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5767441 | Brorein et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770820 | Nelson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5789711 | Gaeris et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5834697 | Baker et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5900588 | Springer et al. | May 1999 | A |
5932847 | Mayfield | Aug 1999 | A |
5936205 | Newmoyer | Aug 1999 | A |
5952607 | Friesen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5952615 | Prudhon | Sep 1999 | A |
5956445 | Deitz, Sr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5969295 | Boucino et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5990419 | Bogese, II | Nov 1999 | A |
6037546 | Mottine et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066799 | Nugent | May 2000 | A |
6101305 | Wagman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6153826 | Kenny et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6194663 | Friesen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211467 | Berelsman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222129 | Siekierka et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248954 | Clark et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255593 | Reede | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288340 | Arnould | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6323427 | Rutledge | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6353177 | Young | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6433272 | Buhler et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452105 | Badii et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6465737 | Bonato et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476326 | Fuzier et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506976 | Neveux, Jr. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6534715 | Maunder et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6545222 | Yokokawa et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6566605 | Prudhon | May 2003 | B1 |
6566607 | Walling | May 2003 | B1 |
6570095 | Clark et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6573456 | Spruell et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6624359 | Bahlmann et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6639152 | Glew et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6743983 | Wiekhorst et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770819 | Patel | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6812408 | Clark et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7109424 | Nordin et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20010032448 | Doherty | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020079126 | Valenzuela | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030106704 | Isley et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121695 | Wiebelhaus et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030217863 | Clark et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040035603 | Clark et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055777 | Wiekhorst et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055779 | Wiekhorst et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040118593 | Augustine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
697378 | Oct 1940 | DE |
0302162 | Feb 1989 | EP |
694100 | Nov 1930 | FR |
1390152 | Apr 1975 | GB |
6-349344 | Dec 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070004268 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60486683 | Jul 2003 | US | |
60488566 | Jul 2003 | US | |
60565464 | Apr 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10887718 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 11468848 | US |