1. Field of Disclosure
This disclosure generally relates to an alignment device for aligning a structural member, such as a bushing, as the structural member is being radially expanded and installed into a workpiece.
2. Description of the Related Art
Structural members, such as conventional bushings with radial flanges, are commonly installed into openings of workpieces for a variety of reasons. For example, the body of the bushing typically reinforces or structurally supports the region around the opening. In addition, the radial flange of the bushing may operate as a washer to transmit the fastener clamp-up loads into the workpiece and/or structural joint, define a bearing surface for bolts, define a wear surface, and the like.
One method for installing bushings, especially in components that will undergo repetitive load cycles and/or may be susceptible to accumulating fatigue damage, is the FORCEMATE® installation method developed by Fatigue Technology, Inc. The FORCEMATE® installation method utilizes an expansion mandrel received in an installation tool. The mandrel is passed through a passage in the bushing after the bushing has been placed in the opening of the workpiece. The mandrel radially expands the bushing into the opening to obtain a controlled, but consistently higher, interference fit than would be achievable by other installations methods, such as shrink or press fitting methods. In addition, the FORCEMATE® installation method may induce beneficial residual compressive stresses into the structural material surrounding the opening, which may advantageously extend the fatigue and damage tolerance (i.e., crack growth) life of the component, assembly, and/or installation. The FORCEMATE® installation method, as well as other cold-working methods, tooling, and the like, such as the BUSHLOC®, FORCETEC®, and FLEXMATE® methods are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,566,662; 3,892,121; 4,187,708; 4,423,619; 4,425,780; 4,471,643; 4,524,600; 4,557,033; 4,809,420; 4,885,829; 4,934,170; 5,083,363; 5,096,349; 5,405,228; 5,245,743; 5,103,548; 5,127,254; 5,305,627; 5,341,559; 5,380,136; 5,433,100; and in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/603,857; 10/726,809 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,100,264); 10/619,226 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,024,908); and 10/633,294 (US/2005/0025601). Other techniques for radially expanding the structural member into the workpiece may use a hydraulic or a pneumatic actuated installation tool that is capable of moving the expansion mandrel through the structural member with a large amount of force.
One drawback with at least some of the aforementioned installation techniques and/or tools is that the weight of the installation tool may influence the alignment of the expansion mandrel relative to the structural member and/or the opening in the workpiece. In addition, the mandrel pulling force generated by the tool to pull the mandrel through the structural member has nothing to react against the pulling force until an expansion portion of the mandrel contacts and actually begins to expand the structural member. If such initial contact occurs when the structural member is misaligned in the opening of the workpiece, then the large pulling force, which may be 20,000 pounds or greater, tends to radially expand the structural member into the workpiece in the misaligned orientation.
As a result, gaps may occur between the radial flange of the structural member and the corresponding surface of the workpiece. The gaps may adversely affect the ability of the radial flange of the bushing to transmit the fastener clamp-up loads into the workpiece. Further, the gaps may result in the structural member failing to meet specific flushness requirements. Thus, the gaps may require that a post-installation seating process be performed on the structural member to properly seat the radial flange against the workpiece. If the gaps are too big, the installed structural member may have to be removed from the opening and replaced with another structural member, which may require re-drilling and oversizing the opening in the workpiece. Additionally or alternatively, residual stresses that may be intended to be induced into the workpiece during the radial expansion of the structural member may be non-uniform, or even non-existent, in some regions across the thickness of the workpiece.
Based on the foregoing, it would be desirable to have an alignment device that can be used with an installation tool to more predictably install the structural member while overcoming at least some of the aforementioned drawbacks.
At least one embodiment generally relates to an alignment device that can be used with a standard mandrel of an installation tool, where the alignment device operates to sufficiently co-axially align the mandrel and a structural member relative to an opening in a workpiece. In one embodiment, the alignment device is a nylon disk having a passageway extending through the disk, where the passageway is sized to be slightly smaller than a major diameter of an expansion portion of the mandrel. As an expansion portion of the mandrel radially expands the disk, a nose section of the installation tool is urged into tight contact with a radial flange of the structural member. In addition, the pull force of the mandrel urges a contacting surface of the alignment device against a back surface of the workpiece. The cooperation of the alignment device and the installation tool is sufficient to seat or clamp the radial flange of the structural member against a front surface of the workpiece while aligning the structural member in the workpiece. Hence, subsequent operations to “seat” the flange onto the workpiece are not necessary.
In one aspect, an alignment device to be used with a mandrel of an installation tool to seat a radial flange of a structural member against a first surface of a workpiece, the radial flange is located at a first end of the structural member and the alignment device includes an outer surface; an inner surface forming an opening through the alignment device, the inner surface having an inner diameter sized to be at least slightly smaller than a major diameter of an expansion portion of the mandrel; and a contacting surface extending substantially from the inner surface to the outer surface, the contacting surface sized to abut at least a portion of an end surface of the structural member and at least a portion of a second surface of the workpiece, the second surface of the workpiece opposing the first surface of the workpiece, the end surface of the structural member opposing the first end of the structural member with the radial flange.
In another aspect, a method of installing a structural member into an opening in a workpiece includes pulling an expansion portion of a mandrel through an alignment device, the alignment device positioned against a first surface of the workpiece, the alignment device having an inner surface forming an opening therethrough, the opening having an inner diameter that is at least slightly smaller than a major diameter of an expansion portion of the mandrel; seating a radial flange of the structural member tightly against a second surface of the workpiece as the expansion portion of the mandrel is pulled through the opening of the alignment device, the second surface of the workpiece opposing the first surface of the workpiece; aligning the structural member with the workpiece as the expansion portion of the mandrel is pulled through the opening of the alignment device; and pulling the expansion portion of the mandrel through the structural member to radially expand and secure the structural member to the workpiece.
In yet another aspect, a method of installing a structural member into an opening in a workpiece includes moving a first portion of a mandrel through an alignment device, the alignment device having an inner surface forming an opening through the alignment device, the opening having an inner diameter that is at least slightly less than a major diameter of an expansion portion of the mandrel; moving the first portion of the mandrel through a passage formed in the structural member after the structural member is located in the opening of the workpiece; engaging the mandrel in the installation tool, the tool located on an opposite side of the workpiece from the alignment device; abutting a nose section of the installation tool against at least a portion of a radial flange located on a first end of the structural member; and activating the installation tool to pull the expansion portion of the mandrel through the opening in the alignment device, where an amount of force necessary to pull the expansion portion of the mandrel through the opening in the alignment device is reacted by the nose section of the installation tool, and where the nose section applies an amount of pressure to the radial flange of the structural member to seat the radial flange tightly against a first surface of the workpiece, the first surface located on the opposite side of the workpiece.
In the drawings, identical reference numbers identify similar elements or acts. The sizes and relative positions of elements in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. For example, the shapes of various elements and angles are not drawn to scale and some of these elements are arbitrarily enlarged and positioned to improve drawing legibility. Further, the particular shapes of the elements as drawn are not intended to convey any information regarding the actual shape of the particular elements and have been solely selected for ease of recognition in the drawings.
In the following description, certain specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of various disclosed embodiments. However, one skilled in the art will understand that the embodiments may be practiced without these details. In other instances, well-known structures and methods associated with cold working and/or installing a bushing, sleeve, liner, or other similar component into an opening in a workpiece may not be shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring descriptions of the disclosed embodiments. It is appreciated and understood that the process of installing the component into the opening of the workpiece may or may not result in the creation of an annular zone of residual compressive stress in the workpiece or workpieces.
In the following description and for purposes of brevity, reference shall be made to cold working and/or radial expanding of the workpiece. This reference is not intended to limit or otherwise narrow the scope of the disclosure. The process of cold expansion is to be broadly interpreted as any process that radially expands at least some of the material surrounding the opening in the workpiece, even if the expansion is for the purpose of impeding the growth of a fatigue crack. It is further understood that cold expanding the opening of the workpiece may or may not induce beneficial compressive residual stresses and may or may not produce fatigue-enhancing benefits in the workpiece.
Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification and claims which follow, the word “comprise” and variations thereof, such as “comprises” and “comprising,” are to be construed in an open, inclusive sense, that is as “including, but not limited to.”
The headings provided herein are for convenience only and do not interpret the scope or meaning of the claimed invention.
The following description relates to an alignment device for aligning a structural member with an opening in a workpiece before and/or during radial expansion of the structural member into the workpiece. The structural member may be, but is not limited to, a bushing, sleeve, liner, or other component.
During the installation process of radially expanding the structural member 102 in the workpiece 104, the expansion mandrel 106 should be sufficiently co-axially aligned with the structural member 102, which in turn should be co-axially aligned with the opening 108 in the workpiece 104. This co-axial alignment, when achieved, permits a more uniform distribution of the compressive residual stresses induced into the workpiece 104 and results in a workpiece contact face 105 of a radial flange 107 of the structural member 102 being placed in tight contact with the corresponding workpiece surface 109.
However, just before an expansion portion 114 of the mandrel 106 enters the structural member 102, the structural member 102 may or may not be adequately aligned in the workpiece 104. Several parameters may cause misalignment of the structural member 102 with respect to the workpiece 104, such as a first amount of clearance 116 between an outer perimeter of the pre-installed structural member 102 and the workpiece 104, a second amount of clearance 118 between the guide members 110 of the installation tool 112 and a first portion 120 of the mandrel 106, or the like. The first and second amount of clearance 116, 118 may occur due to part tolerances. Optionally, the second amount of clearance 118 between the guide members 110 and the first portion 120 of the mandrel 106 may arise or increase after repeated use of the installation tool 112. The clearances 116, 118 may permit some amount of radial play or float of the mandrel 106 and/or the structural member 102, as indicated by the arrows 122.
Further, the weight W of the tool 112 may also factor into the amount of misalignment because often times the structural members 102 are installed with the tool 112 being supported by only one installer or mechanic, without any sort of alignment aid. In
An end 215 of the structural member 202 may be spaced from an outer surface 217 of the workpiece 204. In some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment of
The illustrated alignment device 300 of
The alignment disk 300 can be formed, in whole or in part, of plastics, polymers, rubbers, elastomers, and the like. In some embodiments, the alignment disk 300 is formed of nylon, or similar material. The number and type of materials forming the alignment disk 300 can be selected based on various installation parameters, such as the mandrel configuration, desired clamp-up forces, installation tolerances, or the like.
Generally, the alignment device 412 can help reduce, limit, or substantially eliminate unwanted misalignment of the expansion mandrel 408 attributable to the factors noted above, or other factors that may contribute to mandrel misalignment. When the alignment device 412 is pulled against the workpiece 404, the alignment device 412 biases the expansion mandrel 408 towards a desired position. For example, the illustrated alignment device 412 keeps the expansion mandrel 408 generally perpendicular to both a midplane of the alignment device 412 and a midplane of the workpiece 404. As such, the alignment device 412 can urge the mandrel 408 towards a concentric position with respect to an opening 423 in the structure member 402 and/or the opening 415 in the workpiece 404.
As the expansion portion 406 of the mandrel 408 begins to radially expand an inner perimeter 407 of the alignment device 412, the alignment device 412 is pulled into tight contact with the second surface 409 of the workpiece 404. A nose-cap section 416 of an installation tool 418 can urge the radial flange 414 into tight contact with the first surface 411 of the workpiece 404. The radial flange 414 and the alignment device 412 can compress the workpiece 404 while the mandrel 408 is moved into proper alignment.
The opening 410 can be smaller than at least a portion of the mandrel 408. For example, the opening 410 can have a diameter that is smaller than the major diameter of the mandrel 408 such that the mandrel 408 expands the opening 410 when the mandrel 408 is moved through the opening 410. In some embodiments, inner perimeter 407 and a region located adjacent the inner perimeter 407 of the alignment device 412 are elastically resilient when radially expanded by the major diameter the mandrel 408. In some embodiments, the inner perimeter 407 and a region located adjacent the inner perimeter 407 of the alignment device 412 are plastically deformed when radially expanded by the major diameter of the expansion portion of the mandrel.
The force resistance provided by the alignment device 412, when located against the second surface 409 of the workpiece 404, allows mandrel pull force 420 generated by the tool 418 to respectively align the structural member 402, the workpiece 404, and the mandrel 408, thus overcoming some of the problems and/or drawbacks discussed in the Description of the Related Art. For example, the alignment device 412 can be pulled against the workpiece 404 without damaging the workpiece 404 because of the alignment device 412 being made of a somewhat soft material as compared to the workpiece 404. The flange 414 can be parallel to and abut the first surface 411.
With continued reference to
The alignment device 412 can significantly improve the alignment of the installed structural member 402 as compared to a structural member installed without the aid of the alignment device, such as the structural member 202 of
The receiving region 610 can surround and is adjacent an opening 650, which extends through the alignment device 600. In some embodiments, the receiving region 610 is a recess, counterbore, pocket, or other feature that provides a desired amount of clearance between the structural member 620 and the alignment device 600. The illustrated receiving region 610 is a recess that extends radially outward from the opening 650 past the end 624 of the structural member 620. In some embodiments, the receiving region 610 can have a surface 643 that is frusto-conical, partially spherical, stepped, or with any other suitable configuration selected based the configuration of the structural member 620.
Other portions of a structural member can also be received by a receiving region of an alignment device.
The alignment device 730 also includes a receiving region 755 opposing the receiving region 740. An inner surface 757 of the alignment device 730 extends between the receiving regions 740, 755. The receiving regions 740, 755 can be used to receive different portions of structural members. For example, the receiving region 755 can receive an end of a structural member (similar to the receiving region 610 of
Alignment devices can be used to install structural members without flanges, conventional bushings, sleeves, liners, or the like.
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. All of the above U.S. patents, patent applications and publications referred to in this specification as well as U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,566,662; 3,892,121; 4,187,708; 4,423,619; 4,425,780; 4,471,643; 4,524,600; 4,557,033; 4,809,420; 4,885,829; 4,934,170; 5,083,363; 5,096,349; 5,405,228; 5,245,743; 5,103,548; 5,127,254; 5,305,627; 5,341,559; 5,380,136; 5,433,100; and in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/603,857; 10/726,809 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,100,264); 10/619,226 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,024,908); and 10/633,294 (US/2005/0025601) are incorporated herein by reference. Aspects can be modified, if necessary, to employ devices, features, and concepts of the various patents, applications, and publications to provide yet further embodiments.
These and other changes can be made in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all types of structural members that are installable in an opening of a workpiece and that operate in accordance with the claims. Accordingly, the invention is not limited by the disclosure, but instead its scope is to be determined entirely by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/796,544, filed Apr. 27, 2007, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,617,712 on Nov. 17, 2009, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/796,171 filed Apr. 27, 2006, which applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
295593 | Thayer | Mar 1884 | A |
810430 | Pfluger et al. | Jan 1906 | A |
1081496 | Gillmor | Dec 1913 | A |
1106964 | Pahler | Aug 1914 | A |
1226090 | Ludlum | May 1917 | A |
1297142 | Gibbons | Mar 1919 | A |
1480298 | Pearson | Jan 1924 | A |
1881867 | Nelson | Oct 1932 | A |
1979686 | Hall et al. | Nov 1934 | A |
2092358 | Robertson | Sep 1937 | A |
2146461 | Bettington | Feb 1939 | A |
2150361 | Chobert | Mar 1939 | A |
2188596 | Hobert | Jan 1940 | A |
2275451 | Maxwell | Mar 1942 | A |
2357123 | Maxwell | Aug 1944 | A |
2385294 | Lowy | Sep 1945 | A |
2405399 | Bugg et al. | Aug 1946 | A |
2430554 | Bugg et al. | Nov 1947 | A |
2433425 | Burckle | Dec 1947 | A |
2468985 | Krotz | May 1949 | A |
2528180 | Roehl | Oct 1950 | A |
2661182 | Kipp | Dec 1953 | A |
2672175 | Howard | Mar 1954 | A |
2695446 | Meyer | Nov 1954 | A |
2700172 | Rohe | Jan 1955 | A |
2808643 | Weatherhead, Jr. | Oct 1957 | A |
2943667 | Ewing et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
3128999 | Schmitt | Apr 1964 | A |
3137887 | Mannino et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
3149860 | Hallesy | Sep 1964 | A |
3164054 | Biesecker | Jan 1965 | A |
3244034 | Severdia | Apr 1966 | A |
3252493 | Smith | May 1966 | A |
3345730 | Laverty | Oct 1967 | A |
3358492 | Richter | Dec 1967 | A |
3434746 | Watts | Mar 1969 | A |
3498648 | Hallesy | Mar 1970 | A |
3537163 | Steidl | Nov 1970 | A |
3566662 | Champoux | Mar 1971 | A |
3674292 | Demler, Sr. | Jul 1972 | A |
3693247 | Brown | Sep 1972 | A |
3778090 | Tobin | Dec 1973 | A |
3787945 | Pasek et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3820297 | Hurd | Jun 1974 | A |
3835525 | King, Jr. | Sep 1974 | A |
3875649 | King, Jr. | Apr 1975 | A |
3892121 | Champoux et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3895409 | Kwatonowski | Jul 1975 | A |
3915052 | Ruhl | Oct 1975 | A |
3934325 | Jaffe | Jan 1976 | A |
3949535 | King, Jr. | Apr 1976 | A |
3997193 | Tsuda et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4143580 | Luhm | Mar 1979 | A |
4164807 | King, Jr. | Aug 1979 | A |
4187708 | Champoux | Feb 1980 | A |
4249786 | Mahoff | Feb 1981 | A |
4355612 | Luksch | Oct 1982 | A |
4386515 | Starke | Jun 1983 | A |
4397061 | Kanzaka | Aug 1983 | A |
4405256 | King, Jr. | Sep 1983 | A |
4423619 | Champoux | Jan 1984 | A |
4425780 | Champoux | Jan 1984 | A |
4447944 | Mohrman | May 1984 | A |
4471643 | Champoux et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4482089 | Lindahl et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4522378 | Nelson | Jun 1985 | A |
4524600 | Champoux et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4530527 | Holmberg | Jul 1985 | A |
4557033 | Champoux | Dec 1985 | A |
4583388 | Hogenhout | Apr 1986 | A |
4597282 | Hogenhout | Jul 1986 | A |
4640479 | Shely et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4665732 | Hogenhout | May 1987 | A |
4699212 | Andersson et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4759237 | Fauchet et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4787793 | Harris | Nov 1988 | A |
4809420 | Landy et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4869091 | Shemeta | Sep 1989 | A |
4885829 | Landy | Dec 1989 | A |
4905766 | Dietz et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4934038 | Caudill | Jun 1990 | A |
4934170 | Easterbrook et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4985979 | Speakman | Jan 1991 | A |
4999896 | Mangus et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5038596 | Noonan et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5069586 | Casey | Dec 1991 | A |
5083363 | Ransom et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5093957 | Do | Mar 1992 | A |
5096349 | Landy et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5103548 | Reid et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5110163 | Benson et al. | May 1992 | A |
5127254 | Copple et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5129253 | Austin et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5207461 | Lasko | May 1993 | A |
5218854 | Jarzebowicz et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5245743 | Landy et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253773 | Choma et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5305627 | Quincey et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5341559 | Reid et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5380111 | Westrom | Jan 1995 | A |
5380136 | Copple et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390808 | Choma et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5405228 | Reid et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5433100 | Easterbrook et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5466016 | Briody et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5478122 | Seabra | Dec 1995 | A |
5607194 | Ridenour | Mar 1997 | A |
5609434 | Yehezkieli et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5713611 | Kurimoto et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722312 | Kristensen | Mar 1998 | A |
5806173 | Honma et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5885318 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5943898 | Kuo | Aug 1999 | A |
5947326 | O'Hern et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6058562 | Satou et al. | May 2000 | A |
6131964 | Sareshwala | Oct 2000 | A |
6217082 | Orcutt et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266991 | Kuo | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289577 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6328513 | Niwa et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347663 | Hunzinger et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6488460 | Smith et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499926 | Keener | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6623048 | Castel et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6651301 | Liu | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6705149 | Cobzaru et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6761380 | Pachciarz et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773039 | Muenster et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6796765 | Kosel et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6826820 | Denham et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
RE38788 | Satou et al. | Sep 2005 | E |
7024908 | Poast et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047596 | Sucic et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7059816 | Toosky | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7100264 | Skinner et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7375277 | Skinner et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7406777 | Grover et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7448652 | Poast et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20040111864 | Skinner et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070110541 | Rawlins et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070289351 | Glenn | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005887 | Glenn et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034831 | Glenn | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080066518 | Glenn et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080250603 | Skinner et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2203217 | Jul 1973 | DE |
33 01 849 | Jul 1984 | DE |
3545554 | Jul 1987 | DE |
89 01 317 | Mar 1989 | DE |
0 054 592 | Jun 1982 | EP |
0 140 516 | May 1985 | EP |
0 248 122 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0 891 007 | Jan 1999 | EP |
0 945 919 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1166951 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 202 458 | May 2002 | EP |
1525952 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1611976 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1 903 221 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2645052 | Oct 1990 | FR |
593607 | Oct 1947 | GB |
1395009 | May 1975 | GB |
2 239 917 | Jul 1991 | GB |
57137031 | Aug 1982 | JP |
60238046 | Nov 1985 | JP |
61157846 | Jul 1986 | JP |
632463 | Nov 1978 | SU |
8400120 | Jan 1984 | WO |
2007082077 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007121932 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100236048 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60796171 | Apr 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11796544 | Apr 2007 | US |
Child | 12590990 | US |