The present disclosure is generally related to the technical field of vehicle suspension components. More particularly, the disclosure relates to present to the field of aligning suspension components. Most particularly, the disclosure relates to a locking cam for securing the alignment adjustments in a vehicle.
Adjusting cams are often used in automotive vehicle suspensions to provide adjustment between respective suspension components associated with wheel alignment. In various vehicles, such cams are used to adjust one or more of camber, caster, and/or toe angles in the vehicle.
Typically, the system includes a bolt, at least one adjusting cam, and a nut that secured the bolt in the desired position. The bolt is received through slotted holes in a frame component of the vehicle. In some systems there is a first adjusting cam fixed for rotation with the bolt adjacent the bolt head, and a second adjusting cam fixed for rotation with the bolt near the nut. Because the bolt and the cam surfaces are eccentrically arranged, rotation of the bolt adjusts a position of a longitudinal axis of the bolt within the slotted holes of the frame member. Accordingly, positional adjustment of a control arm or other suspension component secured to the frame member by the bolt can be made by rotating the bolt. Once a desired position of the suspension component is achieved, the nut is then tightened to secure the bolt in position.
Maintaining a properly tightened bolt arrangement is required to maintain a set position of the suspension component under vehicle usage. Under some conditions, such a vehicle wheel strikes a curb or pothole, or during off-road driving, slippage within the slotted holes can cause the suspension component to be moved from the desired position and, consequently, the vehicle can go out of alignment.
While conventional adjusting cams can offer satisfactory performance under most normal operating conditions, there is still a need for improved adjusting cams that are more resistant to slipping.
The present solution to the prior art problem provides a locking cam with a non-planar that is textured to form a gripping surface that abuts against a vehicle frame member and locks the alignment bolt in place.
The Detailed Description will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings in which:
Reference will now be made to the drawings wherein like reference numerals identify the same or similar features of a preferred locking cam.
For purposes of illustration, and not by way of a limitation, an exemplary suspension is shown in
The adjustment components of the assembly 10 generally include a bolt 22, first and second adjustment cams 26, and a nut 28. The bolt 22 includes a head 30 and a shank 32 that is received through the bushing 34 of the control arm 18 and the vehicle frame member 14 in accordance with the application. Typically, the bolt 22 is rotated to adjust an alignment. Once the desired alignment is achieved, as indicated by the position of pin 52, the nut 28 is tightened against the locking cam 26 to secure the bolt 22 in position.
As shown, the preferred locking cam is formed of a suitable metal, such as steel or another metallic alloy, and is heat treated to a Rockwell Hardness greater than 30 HRC. The locking cam body 36 in
As illustrated in
As noted previously, the locking cam body 36 includes an arcuate lobe 48 that includes an arcuate slot 50 for receiving a pin 52, see
With reference to
In a preferred embodiment shown in
A typical original equipment manufacturer's specification for torqueing the alignment group after it is set is about 140 ft-lbs. This has been determined to be sufficient to engage the serrations with the vehicle frame
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2525217 | Glitsch | Oct 1950 | A |
D243714 | Younger | Mar 1977 | S |
5129669 | Specktor | Jul 1992 | A |
5775719 | Holden | Jul 1998 | A |
6350094 | Shiokawa | Feb 2002 | B1 |
D472190 | McCoy et al. | Mar 2003 | S |
6659479 | Raidel, II | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6732982 | Messinger | May 2004 | B1 |
6908254 | Atwater | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7125026 | Genick, II | Oct 2006 | B2 |
D544032 | Shimada et al. | Jun 2007 | S |
D556842 | Webber | Dec 2007 | S |
7370868 | Genick, II | May 2008 | B2 |
7661916 | Downey | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7857565 | Martinson | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7891679 | Svartz et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
D697574 | McPherson | Jan 2014 | S |
D755683 | Goodlow | May 2016 | S |
D842258 | Somers | Mar 2019 | S |
10940731 | Tiramani | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11584160 | Wharram | Feb 2023 | B2 |
D1004657 | Verbowski | Nov 2023 | S |
D1010502 | Hatcher | Jan 2024 | S |
20020015628 | Hartmann | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20120104713 | Frens | May 2012 | A1 |
20170231797 | LeCursi et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180127028 | McIntyre | May 2018 | A1 |
20210276386 | Verbowski | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2774711 | Jun 2011 | CA |
1467135 | Oct 2004 | EP |
4286247 | Dec 2023 | EP |
202100019331 | Jan 2023 | IT |
2021127789 | Sep 2021 | JP |
WO-2010006363 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240326914 A1 | Oct 2024 | US |