All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates generally to imaging techniques, and more particularly to ultrasound imaging, and still more particularly to systems and methods for calibration and quality assurance measurement of ultrasound probes, particularly probes having multiple apertures.
In conventional (scanline-based) ultrasonic imaging, a focused beam of ultrasound energy (a scanline) is transmitted into body tissues to be examined and echoes returning along the same scanline are detected and plotted. A complete image may be formed by combining multiple scanlines. While ultrasound has been used extensively for diagnostic purposes, conventional scanline-based ultrasound has been greatly limited by depth of scanning, speckle noise, poor lateral resolution, obscured tissues and other problems.
Significant improvements have been made in the field of ultrasound imaging with the creation of multiple aperture imaging, some examples of which are shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,439 titled “Method and Apparatus to Produce Ultrasonic images Using Multiple Apertures,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/029,907, filed Feb. 18, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,146,313, titled “Point Source Transmission and Speed-Of-Sound Correction Using Multiple-Aperture Ultrasound Imaging, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/760,375, filed Apr. 4, 2010, titled “Universal Multiple Aperture Medical Ultrasound Probe,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/760,327, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,473,239, titled “Multiple Aperture Ultrasound Array Alignment Fixture,” all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Multiple aperture imaging methods and systems allow for ultrasound signals to be both transmitted and received from separate apertures.
Ultrasound probes constructed to perform multiple aperture ultrasound imaging typically contain multiple separate transducer arrays. During construction of such a probe, the multiple arrays need to be aligned in a common imaging plane and in a desired orientation relative to one another. Some methods of performing such alignment and construction are shown and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/760,327, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,473,239. Room for further improvement remains.
In one embodiment, a method of building a multiple aperture ultrasound probe is provided, the method comprising the steps of forming a gasket with a first flowable solidifying material on a lower surface of a precision alignment element, securing the precision alignment element to a back surface of a transducer array with the gasket, evaluating and adjusting alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element, and injecting a second flowable solidifying material through at least one hole in the precision alignment element to secure the transducer array to the precision alignment element.
In some embodiments, the injecting step comprises filling a volume defined by the back surface of the transducer array, the lower surface of the precision alignment element, and an inner surface of the gasket with the second flowable solidifying material.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises allowing the second flowable solidifying material to solidify, and mounting the precision alignment element to a probe alignment bracket.
In alternative embodiments, the method further comprises placing the probe alignment bracket into a probe housing, and injecting a third flowable solidifying material into a space between the transducer array and the probe housing.
In other embodiments, the injected third flowable solidifying material surrounds at least a portion of the precision alignment element or the probe alignment bracket.
In one embodiment, evaluating alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element comprises imaging a target with the transducer array and comparing a resulting image of the target with known information defining a geometry of the target.
In some embodiments, the target comprises a plurality of pins oriented in a known configuration relative to the precision alignment element.
In other embodiments, each of the pins has a flat surface substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the pins, the longitudinal axis being substantially perpendicular to an ultrasound wavefront transmitted from a single element of the transducer array and arriving at the pins.
In some embodiments, adjusting alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element comprises adjusting at least one set screw to mechanically move the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises allowing the first flowable solidifying material to solidify prior to evaluating and adjusting alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element.
In additional embodiments, the first flowable solidifying material and the second flowable solidifying material are the same material.
In one embodiment, the pins are oriented with longitudinal axes that intersect at a single point.
A method of evaluating an alignment of an ultrasound transducer array relative to a precision alignment element is also provided, the method comprising the steps of flexibly securing the ultrasound transducer array to the precision alignment element, mounting the precision alignment element in a fixed, known position and orientation relative to a target, the target having a plurality of reflectors in known reflector positions, imaging the reflectors of the target with the array, comparing imaged reflector positions with known reflector positions, and identifying a corrective adjustment based on the comparing step.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises comparing a brightness of the reflectors with expected brightness values.
In other embodiments, the method further comprises visually comparing imaged reflector positions with known reflector positions using a graphical user interface in which a first image comprising the imaged reflector positions is displayed simultaneously with a second image comprising the known reflector positions.
In alternative embodiments, the graphical user interface further comprises a graphical representation of a brightness of imaged reflectors within a predetermined radius of the known reflector positions.
An ultrasound probe alignment system is provided, comprising a tank assembly comprising an ultrasound conducting material, an array affixing and adjusting assembly at least partially within the tank assembly, the array affixing and adjusting assembly supporting a precision alignment element in a known position and orientation relative to a target assembly, the target assembly being disposed in the tank assembly and comprising at least one reflector configured to reflect an ultrasound signal.
Some embodiments further comprise a height adjustment assembly configured to adjust a distance between the array affixing and adjusting assembly and the target assembly.
In other embodiments, the target assembly comprises a plurality of pins arranged so as to be coincident with a precisely aligned imaging plane of the ultrasound probe alignment system.
In some embodiments, the pins are arranged so as to be displaced from one another in two dimensions in the imaging plane of the ultrasound probe alignment system.
In one embodiment, the pins vary in length so as to lie on multiple different points of the imaging plane of the ultrasound probe alignment system.
In alternative embodiments, the plurality of pins comprises a center pin and at least one pair of pins equidistant from the center pin.
In other embodiments, the array affixing and adjusting assembly comprises structures for adjusting an orientation of an ultrasound transducer array relative to the precision alignment element.
A multiple aperture ultrasound probe is provided, comprising a probe housing, a first transducer array secured to a first precision alignment element by a layer of a solidified polymer material, the first precision alignment element comprising a first plate secured to a back surface of the first transducer array, the first precision alignment element being secured to a probe bracket of the probe housing, a second transducer array secured to a second precision alignment element by a layer of a solidified polymer material, the second precision alignment element comprising a second plate secured to a back surface of the second transducer array, the second precision alignment element being secured to the probe bracket of the probe housing, and a filler solidified polymer material disposed in a space between the first and second transducer arrays and the probe housing.
In some embodiments, the first and second arrays are precisely aligned relative to the first and second precision alignment elements, respectively.
In other embodiments, the first precision alignment element comprises a plate having at least one hole through which a quantity of solidified polymer material extends.
In one embodiment, the plate comprises two holes, at least one of which has a quantity of solidified polymer material extending therethrough.
In some embodiments, the first precision alignment element is secured to a single surface of the first transducer array.
In additional embodiments, the first precision alignment element is secured to the probe bracket by a plurality of mechanical fasteners.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
The following disclosure provides embodiments of systems and methods for constructing accurately aligned multiple aperture ultrasound probes. Some embodiments provide systems and methods for checking, adjusting, and securing the alignment of an individual array relative to a precision alignment element (PAE). Some embodiments provide systems and methods for mechanically aligning and affixing multiple transducer arrays in a desired alignment relative to one another and relative to a probe housing.
It is important that ultrasound probes to be used in high resolution multiple aperture ultrasound imaging be precisely constructed such that each of a plurality of transducer arrays be precisely aligned along a common imaging plane. It is further important that such arrays be mounted within a probe housing at a precise angle, orientation and position relative to each other and relative to the probe housing itself.
As used herein, references to the “exact” or “precise” position of transducer elements (and similar terms) may imply a relatively tight tolerance. For example, in some embodiments ultrasound probe calibration systems and methods may provide information describing the acoustic position of each transducer element in an array to within a distance of a fraction of a wavelength of ultrasound being used. In some embodiments, the acoustic position of transducer elements may be determined to within 1/10 of a wavelength. In other embodiments, the acoustic position of transducer elements may be determined to within a tolerance of less than 1/10 of a wavelength. In some embodiments, such as for calibrating a standard (i.e., single aperture) ultrasound probe, much looser tolerances may also be used, provided that such tolerances meet the needs of a particular system.
Conventional ultrasound (or “scanline based” ultrasound as used herein) utilizes a phased array controller to produce and steer a substantially linear transmit waveform groups. In order to produce a B-mode image, a sequence of such linear waveform groups (or “scanlines”) may be produced and steered so as to scan across a region of interest. Echoes are received along each respective scanline in a process known as receive beamforming. The echoes received along the individual scanlines may then be combined to form a complete image.
In a ping-based imaging process, an unfocused circular wavefront is transmitted from a point source transmitter, and the echoes are received by a plurality of receive transducers. The received echoes may then be beamformed using a ping-based beamforming process in order to determine a display location for each reflector that returns an echo. Beamforming is generally understood to be a process by which imaging signals received at multiple discrete receptors are combined to form a complete coherent image. The process of ping-based beamforming is consistent with this understanding.
Embodiments of ping-based beamforming generally involve determining the position of reflectors corresponding to portions of received echo data based on the path along which an ultrasound signal may have traveled, an assumed-constant speed of sound and the elapsed time between a transmit ping and the time at which an echo is received. In other words, ping-based imaging involves a calculation of distance based on an assumed speed and a measured time. Once such a distance has been calculated, it is possible to triangulate the possible positions of any given reflector. This distance calculation is made possible with accurate information about the relative positions of transmit and receive transducer elements. Further details of ping-based imaging are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/029,907, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,146,313, referenced above.
Embodiments of Alignment Array Fixtures and Assemblies
In general, it may be desirable for a flowable solidifying material to have properties in its solid state that are similar to properties of a medium to be imaged and similar to a lens material attached to a manufactured transducer array (which may also be specified for particular applications). RTV silicone is well-suited to medical applications while more rigid materials, such as hard-curing epoxies or a metal-impregnated epoxies may be well-suited to non-destructive testing applications. In still further embodiments, a flowable solidifying material may be a phase-changing material. For example, a molten plastic may be flowed as needed, and then allowed to solidify by cooling to a temperature below a melting point.
In various alternative embodiments, multiple aperture probes may be constructed with 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more individual transducer arrays in a common housing. In some embodiments, all transducer arrays in a probe may be oriented in a common imaging plane. In other embodiments, some arrays may be aligned in multiple imaging planes so as to facilitate 3D or 4D imaging. Generally, multiple aperture probes are designed with relatively tight tolerances for the position and orientation of arrays within the probe housing. In order to meet these tolerances while assembling a probe, an alignment and affixing process may be needed.
In the illustrated embodiment, the PAE 60 may be secured to the assembly 54 by arms 57. In alternative embodiments, any number of other structures may also be used depending on the shape and configuration of the PAE and other portions of the alignment assembly 50. In other embodiments, the PAE 60 may also include further structures and features designed to enable precise alignment of the PAE 60 with components of the assembly 54. An Adjustment cover 61 may also be provided to surround the array 62, and to provide structure for a plurality of adjustment screws 63.
In some such embodiments, the alignment assembly 50 of
In some embodiments, all or part of the assembly 50 may be mounted relative to a tank containing a liquid bath such that at least the target assembly 56 and the emitting surface of the transducer array 62 may be submerged in a liquid medium with a known consistent speed of sound (e.g., water, gel, oil or other material as described in further detail below). In various embodiments, the tank-affixing section 52 may include any structure for affixing the assembly 50 relative to a water tank such that at least the array transducers 60 and the target 56 are submerged.
In other embodiments, the water tank may be omitted. For example, a target assembly 56 may be encased within a solid material with a known consistent speed-of-sound (e.g., RTV silicone, ballistic gelatin, or any other solid elastic material suitable for use in ultrasound phantoms), and the transducer array 60 to be aligned may be acoustically coupled to a surface of the target assembly by an acoustic coupling gel or a conformable bladder containing a liquid or gel. In such embodiments, the material in which the target is encased may be selected based on the frequency and style of array under test. For example, whereas medical transducers are designed in the 1 to 18 MHz area, ideal target-encasing materials may have similar characteristics to human tissue. On the other hand, a transducer to be used in non-destructive testing (NDT) of industrial materials may be designed to operate at substantially higher frequencies in order to evaluate metals and composites. Some NDT arrays may also be air-coupled, doing its job without ever touching the work surface. Such devices typically work at much lower frequencies. A coupling medium is a bridge to allow energy of an appropriate frequency to travel back and forth from the testing array to the object under test (e.g., a phantom containing an alignment target). In the case of medical arrays and some low frequency NDT arrays, a coupling medium may include compatible gels, lotions, oils or water depending on the materials to be imaged. Higher frequency NDT arrays might use water, oil or a combination of liquids as a coupling medium. In some embodiments, a coupling medium may comprise a flexible bladder or pad of a material with suitable properties.
As best seen in
In some embodiments, target pins may be arranged in a common imaging plane and oriented at angles such that longitudinal axes of the pins intersect at a single point near the transducer array (e.g., above the transducer array's transmitting surface in some embodiments). For example, in some embodiments, pins furthest from a center pin (the end pins) may be oriented such that, with the target positioned at a minimum distance from the array, the end pins lie at a desired angle relative to the precision alignment element. For example, the end pins may be oriented at an angle of about 30 degrees relative to a line perpendicular to the precision alignment element in the imaging plane. Larger or smaller angles may be desirable depending on an angle of sensitivity of transducer elements in transducer arrays to be aligned.
When imaged by a transducer array to be aligned, each pin may appear as a dot. In this target configuration, each pin may appear as a dot in a known location on a display when the target is imaged by an aligned array supported in the array holder assembly.
In some embodiments, a target 56 may include a plurality of reflectors positioned so as to evaluate the array's alignment at various discrete distances from the target. For example, a target may include a center pin 66T and a plurality of pairs 66A-66D of pins laterally spaced equal distances from the center pin 66T. In various embodiments, a target may include any number of pairs of laterally-spaced pins. In some embodiments, the pairs of pins may be provided in a range of different lengths, meaning that some pairs of pins are closer to the transducer array than others. In various embodiments, alignment of an array may be evaluated at various distances from the target. In some embodiments, pin lengths may be calculated so as to place the faces of each pair of pins and the center pin 66T coincident with an arc of a transmitted wavefront at a selected depth.
In some embodiments, different reflectors of the target 56 may be configured and used for evaluating the array's alignment at different distances from the target 56 and/or for evaluating the array transmitting at different frequencies. For example, the target shown in
In further alternative embodiments, the target 56 may include phantom structures with reflectors made of any suitable ultrasonically-reflecting material in a variety of alternative configurations. For example, the target may comprise a plurality of small sphere-shaped reflectors embedded in a solid material. Generally, a target may include any number of reflectors made of an appropriate echogenic material, as determined by the frequency and array style, that provides a small reflective surface relative to the wave length of the sound being used. Such reflective objects may be encased in precisely known locations in a sonolucent material. The sonolucent material to be used may be selected to be similar to conditions to be experienced by the array in an intended application. As such, in some cases, a sonolucent material may or may not offer attenuation. Reflectors in a target assembly need not be arranged in a symmetrical pattern, but preferably include multiple points at multiple different known locations such that alignment may be evaluated. The target may generally include any pattern of reflectors which may be supported within a solid, liquid or gaseous medium (depending on the intended use application). In some embodiments, a target may also include one or more “holes”—regions or objects that substantially absorb and do not reflect significant ultrasound signals. In some embodiments it may be desirable for reflectors or holes to be aligned in a single plane that is may be aligned with the ideal imaging plane.
In some alternative embodiments, a target may include any substantially static object that may be imaged with an ultrasound probe. For example, any number of phantoms designed for sonographer training are widely commercially available from various suppliers of medical equipment. Some commercially available phantoms are made to mimic the imaging characteristics of objects to be imaged such as specific or generic human tissues. Such properties may or may not be used in combination with various embodiments described herein. An object need not be purpose-built as a phantom to be used as a phantom for the alignment processes described herein.
As shown in
In alternative embodiments, a precision alignment element may be provided in a variety of different structures, and may include any suitable features to ensure and/or to verify accurate and precise positioning of the PAE 60 relative to the target 56. For example, the PAE may include holes, pins, recesses or other structures configured to engage (or to be engaged by) corresponding structures on a holder assembly. In general, a precision alignment element (or PAE) may be any structure that may be mounted in a known precise position relative to a target in an alignment test assembly. Similarly, alternative holder assembly structures may include clamps, screws, pins, holes, recesses and various other mechanical structures configured to engage corresponding portions of a PAE and to hold a PAE in a consistent known position and orientation relative to a target.
In some embodiments, precision alignment features may be integrated into a probe alignment bracket (such as that described below with reference to
As shown in
In some embodiments, a jig 82, such as that shown in
It is generally desirable for the gasket to secure the PAE to the array while remaining somewhat flexible, allowing a small degree of movement between the PAE and the array during the alignment and adjustment process. Such flexibility may be achieved through selection of an appropriate flowable solidifying material and/or selecting a gasket thickness and width that allows sufficient flexibility. Alternatively, flexibility of the gasket may be achieved by performing the adjustment process before a hardening material completely cures.
In some embodiments, the PAE 60 and array 62 may be held within the jig 82 for a sufficient time for the gasket material to cure. Once cured, the PAE 62 will be temporarily secured to the back surface 80 of the transducer array 62 by the gasket, while allowing a small range of movement between the PAE 60 and the array 62. Although the use of a jig may provide a certain degree of precision to the assembly, the actual acoustic position of the transducer elements may not necessarily be precisely consistent with the physical back surface 80 of the transducer array 62 simply due to inevitable manufacturing variability.
In some embodiments, the PAE 60 may also include features and structures configured to facilitate precise alignment of the PAE 60 and an attached transducer array 62 with elements of a final probe assembly. For example, as shown in
In some embodiments, the PAE 60 may include one or more injection holes 94 through which a flowable solidifying material may be injected once the transducer array is determined to be perfectly aligned with the PAE (as will be described in further detail below with reference to
In various embodiments, ribbon connectors extending from the array may be electrically connected to a controller in order to transmit and/or receive ultrasonic signals using the transducer array. Any suitable connector may be used for achieving such electrical connections.
Alignment Imaging Controller Embodiments
As shown in
The controller 200 may contain software and hardware elements configured to control an imaging process. In various embodiments of the alignment methods described herein, any imaging method (e.g., ping-based imaging, scanline-based imaging or any other available ultrasound imaging method) may be used for imaging the target assembly. Due to the use of transducer element position in ping-based beamforming methods, such methods may be particularly suited for an alignment evaluation process.
The transmission of ultrasound signals from elements of the array 62 may be controlled by a transmit controller 204. Upon receiving echoes of transmit signals, the transducer elements may generate time-varying electric signals corresponding to the received ultrasound vibrations. Signals representing the received echoes may be output from the array 62 and sent to a receive subsystem 210. In some embodiments, the receive subsystem may include multiple channels (e.g., one channel for each transducer element in some embodiments). Each channel may include an analog front-end device (“AFE”) 212 and an analog-to-digital conversion device (“ADC”) 214. In some embodiments, each channel of the receive subsystem 210 may also include digital filters and data conditioners (not shown) after the ADC 214. In some embodiments, analog filters prior to the ADC 214 may also be provided. In some embodiments, the output of each ADC 214 may be directed into a raw data memory device 220. Notably, the controller 200 need not include a scan converter for systems configured to use a ping-based imaging method.
In some embodiments, raw echo data may be stored in a raw data memory device 220 prior to any beamforming or image formation. In some embodiments, echo data may be passed directly from a receive subsystem 210 to an image formation sub-system 230.
The image formation sub-system 230 may include a beamformer 232 and an image layer combiner (“ILC”) 234. If needed, image data may be temporarily stored in an image buffer memory device 236. In some embodiments, the image formation subsystem may retrieve stored echo data from the raw data memory device rather than receiving real-time echo data from the receive sub-system. The beamformer 232 may include or may have logical access to a memory device 238 containing transducer element position data. In the case of a new un-aligned and un-calibrated transducer array, such transducer element position data may be based on an idealized case for transducer arrays of a particular type. Alternatively, the transducer element position data may be based on calibration analysis of a plurality of previously-aligned arrays.
An alignment overlay subsystem 235 may include stored data including information describing known positions of reflectors in the target 56. In some embodiments, such an alignment overlay sub-system may include information for several targets which may be selectable by a user depending on which target is to be used. The alignment overlay subsystem may also include hardware and software for forming an image of expected reflector positions and additional information for assisting in assessing the alignment of a transducer array under examination.
The controller 200 may be further configured to output image data to a display sub-system 240. A display subsystem 240 may include a video processor 242 for performing various digital video image processing steps, a video memory 246 for storing “cine loop” data (e.g., processed video clips), and a display controller 244 configured to output image pixels to a display device.
Array Alignment Testing and Adjustment Method Embodiments
Thus, returning to the process diagram of
Because the position of the pin tips 66 may be known with a high degree of precision, the expected image produced by a perfectly-aligned array may be predicted with a high degree of precision. Thus, the actual obtained image may be compared with the theoretically ideal image, and the alignment of the array may be quantitatively and/or qualitatively evaluated. In some embodiments, such a qualitative comparison may be performed visually by a user. In order to assist in visually comparing the actual image with the theoretical image, a software layer may be configured to overlay a schematic representation of the theoretical image with the actual image. In some embodiments, the two images may be displayed in contrasting colors to further aid in distinguishing the actual image from the theoretical image.
In the example of
Misalignment due to rotation about the longitudinal axis 102 may be detected by recognizing that the images of all of the pins 110A-110C (or at least the center pin image 110C) is not as bright as expected. Such misalignment may be corrected by adjusting either the front screws 74D, 74C in the PAE or the rear PAE screws 74A, 74B depending on the suspected direction of misalignment about the longitudinal axis. In some cases, similar adjustments may be made my adjusting screws 63A-63C in the adjustment cover 61.
Misalignment about the vertical axis 106 may result in the images of pins further from the center being progressively less bright than the center pin image 110C. Such misalignment about the vertical axis may be corrected by tightening one or more of the adjustment screws 63A or 63C in the front plate 61 of the adjustment assembly 54.
In some embodiments, an assessment of the alignment of an array under test may be made based primarily on the imaged position of the center pin 110C and a single pair of pins equidistant from the center pin 110C. For example, the degree and direction of any misalignment of the array may be determined by evaluating the imaged position of only the center pin 110C and the two next-closest pins 110B and 110D relative to the expected positions of those pins.
In some embodiments, the step 26 (in the process of
With reference to
In various embodiments, some or all of the process of testing and adjusting alignment of a transducer array may be automated. For example, software may be provided and configured for evaluating misalignment of an array and selecting a suitable corrective adjustment as described above. Furthermore, robotic elements may be provided and configured to adjust the various set screws in order to automatically apply a corrective adjustment selected by a software agent. A robotic element may also be provided for injecting a quantity of a flowable solidifying material into the space between the PAE and the array.
Probe Assembly Method Embodiments
Once a sufficient number of arrays have been aligned to their respective PAEs, the aligned arrays may be mounted to a probe alignment bracket 120 such as that shown in
In some embodiments, the probe alignment bracket 120 may also include attachment flanges 128 for securing an electronic connection board (not shown). An electronic connection board may be configured with a plurality of connectors configured for electrical connection to the flex connectors extending from each transducer array. In some embodiments, the connector board may further include traces connecting the transducer array connections to a common connector that may be configured for connection to a cable. Details of some embodiments of such connector boards and cabling assemblies may be seen in Applicants' U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/272,098 titled “Multiple Aperture Probe Internal Apparatus and Cable Assemblies,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
The probe internal assembly including the probe alignment bracket 120, connector board and aligned array-PAE assemblies may then be inserted into a probe housing 14 as shown in
Once the internal assembly is fully inserted into a probe housing 14, the aligned arrays 12A-12C and the probe alignment bracket 120 to which they are mounted may be permanently potted by injecting a flowable solidifying material 130 such as RTV silicone into the shell housing, surrounding at least portions of the arrays 12A-12C. In some embodiments, a flowable solidifying material 130 may also be injected further into the probe housing 14 so as to surround all or portions of the probe alignment bracket 12. In some embodiments, the flowable solidifying material may be used to substantially fill the space between the arrays and the sides of the probe housing 14. The solidifying material may also be smoothed out so as to provide a substantially consistent surface with the front surfaces of the arrays 12A-12C.
Embodiments of Completed Probe Assemblies
In various embodiments, a final probe assembled using the systems and methods described above may have some unique characteristics, some of which are illustrated in
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. Various modifications to the above embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
In particular, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. Furthermore, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, unless explicitly stated otherwise, the term “or” is inclusive of all presented alternatives, and means essentially the same as the commonly used phrase “and/or.” It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/210,015, filed Mar. 13, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,510,806, which application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/780,366, filed Mar. 13, 2013, titled “Alignment of Ultrasound Transducer Arrays and Multiple Aperture Probe Assembly”, the contents of each application incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3174286 | Erickson | Mar 1965 | A |
3895381 | Kock | Jul 1975 | A |
3974692 | Hassler | Aug 1976 | A |
4055988 | Dutton | Nov 1977 | A |
4072922 | Taner et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4097835 | Green | Jun 1978 | A |
4105018 | Greenleaf et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4180792 | Lederman et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4259733 | Taner et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4265126 | Papadofrangakis et al. | May 1981 | A |
4271842 | Specht et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4325257 | Kino et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4327738 | Green et al. | May 1982 | A |
4333474 | Nigam | Jun 1982 | A |
4339952 | Foster | Jul 1982 | A |
4452084 | Taenzer | Jun 1984 | A |
4501279 | Seo | Feb 1985 | A |
4511998 | Kanda et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4539847 | Paap | Sep 1985 | A |
4566459 | Umemura et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4567768 | Satoh et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4604697 | Luthra et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4662222 | Johnson | May 1987 | A |
4669482 | Ophir | Jun 1987 | A |
4682497 | Sasaki | Jul 1987 | A |
4781199 | Hirama et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4817434 | Anderson | Apr 1989 | A |
4831601 | Breimesser et al. | May 1989 | A |
4893284 | Magrane | Jan 1990 | A |
4893628 | Angelsen | Jan 1990 | A |
4990462 | Sliwa, Jr. | Feb 1991 | A |
5050588 | Grey et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5141738 | Rasor et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5161536 | Vilkomerson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5197475 | Antich et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5226019 | Bahorich | Jul 1993 | A |
5230339 | Charlebois | Jul 1993 | A |
5269309 | Fort et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5278757 | Hoctor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5293871 | Reinstein et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299576 | Shiba | Apr 1994 | A |
5301674 | Erikson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305756 | Entrekin et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5339282 | Kuhn et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340510 | Bowen | Aug 1994 | A |
5345426 | Lipschutz | Sep 1994 | A |
5349960 | Gondo | Sep 1994 | A |
5355888 | Kendall | Oct 1994 | A |
5398216 | Hall et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5409010 | Beach et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5442462 | Guissin | Aug 1995 | A |
5454372 | Banjanin et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5503152 | Oakley et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515853 | Smith et al. | May 1996 | A |
5515856 | Olstad et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522393 | Phillips et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526815 | Granz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544659 | Banjanin | Aug 1996 | A |
5558092 | Unger et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5564423 | Mele et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568812 | Murashita et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570691 | Wright et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581517 | Gee et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5625149 | Gururaja et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628320 | Teo | May 1997 | A |
5673697 | Bryan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675550 | Ekhaus | Oct 1997 | A |
5720291 | Schwartz | Feb 1998 | A |
5720708 | Lu et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5744898 | Smith et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769079 | Hossack | Jun 1998 | A |
5784334 | Sena et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785654 | Iinuma et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795297 | Daigle | Aug 1998 | A |
5797845 | Barabash et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798459 | Ohba et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5820561 | Olstad et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838564 | Bahorich et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850622 | Vassiliou et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862100 | VerWest | Jan 1999 | A |
5870691 | Partyka et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876342 | Chen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891038 | Seyed-Bolorforosh et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892732 | Gersztenkorn | Apr 1999 | A |
5916169 | Hanafy et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919139 | Lin | Jul 1999 | A |
5920285 | Benjamin | Jul 1999 | A |
5930730 | Marfurt et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940778 | Marfurt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951479 | Holm et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964707 | Fenster et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969661 | Benjamin | Oct 1999 | A |
5999836 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007499 | Martin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013032 | Savord | Jan 2000 | A |
6014473 | Hossack et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6048315 | Chiao et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049509 | Sonneland et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050943 | Slayton et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056693 | Haider | May 2000 | A |
6058074 | Swan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077224 | Lang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092026 | Bahorich et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6122538 | Sliwa, Jr. et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123670 | Mo | Sep 2000 | A |
6129672 | Seward et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135960 | Holmberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6138075 | Yost | Oct 2000 | A |
6148095 | Prause et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162175 | Marian, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166384 | Dentinger et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166853 | Sapia et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6193665 | Hall et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196739 | Silverbrook | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200266 | Shokrollahi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210335 | Miller | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213958 | Winder | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221019 | Kantorovich | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231511 | Bae | May 2001 | B1 |
6238342 | Feleppa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246901 | Benaron | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251073 | Imran et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264609 | Herrington et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266551 | Osadchy et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278949 | Alam | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289230 | Chaiken et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299580 | Asafusa | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304684 | Niczyporuk et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309356 | Ustuner et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324453 | Breed et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345539 | Rawes et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361500 | Masters | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363033 | Cole et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370480 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374185 | Taner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394955 | Perlitz | May 2002 | B1 |
6423002 | Hossack | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436046 | Napolitano et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449821 | Sudol et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450965 | Williams et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6468216 | Powers et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471650 | Powers et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475150 | Haddad | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6480790 | Calvert et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487502 | Taner | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6499536 | Ellingsen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508768 | Hall et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508770 | Cai | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517484 | Wilk et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526163 | Halmann et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6543272 | Vitek | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547732 | Jago | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551246 | Ustuner et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565510 | Haider | May 2003 | B1 |
6585647 | Winder | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604421 | Li | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614560 | Silverbrook | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6620101 | Azzam et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6652461 | Levkovitz | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6668654 | Dubois et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6672165 | Rather et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6681185 | Young et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690816 | Aylward et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692450 | Coleman | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695778 | Golland et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702745 | Smythe | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719693 | Richard | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728567 | Rather et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6752762 | DeJong et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755787 | Hossack et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6780152 | Ustuner et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790182 | Eck et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6837853 | Marian | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6843770 | Sumanaweera | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847737 | Kouri et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6854332 | Alleyne | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6932767 | Landry et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7033320 | Von Behren et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7087023 | Daft et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104956 | Christopher | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7217243 | Takeuchi | May 2007 | B2 |
7221867 | Silverbrook | May 2007 | B2 |
7231072 | Yamano et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7269299 | Schroeder | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7283652 | Mendonca et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285094 | Nohara et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7313053 | Wodnicki | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7366704 | Reading et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7402136 | Hossack et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410469 | Talish et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7415880 | Renzel | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7443765 | Thomenius et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444875 | Wu et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7447535 | Lavi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7448998 | Robinson | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7466848 | Metaxas et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469096 | Silverbrook | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7474778 | Shinomura et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7481577 | Ramamurthy et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7491171 | Barthe et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497828 | Wilk et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7497830 | Li | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510529 | Chou et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514851 | Wilser et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7549962 | Dreschel et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7574026 | Rasche et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7625343 | Cao et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637869 | Sudol | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7668583 | Fegert et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7674228 | Williams et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682311 | Simopoulos et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7699776 | Walker et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7722541 | Cai | May 2010 | B2 |
7744532 | Ustuner et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7750311 | Daghighian | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7785260 | Umemura et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787680 | Ahn et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7806828 | Stringer | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819810 | Stringer et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822250 | Yao et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824337 | Abe et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7833163 | Cai | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837624 | Hossack et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7846097 | Jones et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850613 | Stribling | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7862508 | Davies et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7876945 | Lötjönen | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7887486 | Ustuner et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901358 | Mehi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914451 | Davies | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919906 | Cerofolini | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926350 | Kröning et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927280 | Davidsen | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7972271 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7984637 | Ao et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7984651 | Randall et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002705 | Napolitano et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8007439 | Specht | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8057392 | Hossack et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057393 | Yao et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8079263 | Randall et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8079956 | Azuma et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8088067 | Vortman et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8088068 | Yao et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8088071 | Hwang et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105239 | Specht | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8135190 | Bae et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8157737 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8182427 | Wu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8202219 | Luo et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8277383 | Specht | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8279705 | Choi et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8412307 | Willis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8419642 | Sandrin et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8473239 | Specht et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478382 | Burnside et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8532951 | Roy et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8582848 | Funka-Lea et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8602993 | Specht et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8627724 | Papadopoulos et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8634615 | Brabec | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8672846 | Napolitano et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8684936 | Specht | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9072495 | Specht | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9146313 | Specht et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9192355 | Specht et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9220478 | Smith et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9247926 | Smith et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9265484 | Brewer et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9282945 | Smith et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9339256 | Specht et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9420994 | Specht | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9510806 | Smith et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9526475 | Specht et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20020035864 | Paltieli et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020087071 | Schmitz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111568 | Bukshpan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138003 | Bukshpan | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161299 | Prater et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030013962 | Bjaerum et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028111 | Vaezy et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040669 | Grass et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030228053 | Li et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040054283 | Corey et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068184 | Trahey et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100163 | Baumgartner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111028 | Abe et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122313 | Moore et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122322 | Moore et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127793 | Mendlein et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138565 | Trucco | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144176 | Yoden | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040236217 | Cerwin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236223 | Barnes et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004449 | Mitschke et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050053305 | Li et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054910 | Tremblay et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090743 | Kawashima et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090745 | Steen | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111846 | Steinbacher et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113689 | Gritzky | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113694 | Haugen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124883 | Hunt | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131300 | Bakircioglu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147297 | McLaughlin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165312 | Knowles et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050203404 | Freiburger | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215883 | Hundley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240125 | Makin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252295 | Fink et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281447 | Moreau-Gobard et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288588 | Weber et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060062447 | Rinck et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074313 | Slayton et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074315 | Liang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074320 | Yoo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079759 | Vaillant et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079778 | Mo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079782 | Beach et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094962 | Clark | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111634 | Wu | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122506 | Davies et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173327 | Kim | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060262961 | Holsing et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270934 | Savord et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016022 | Blalock et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016044 | Blalock et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070036414 | Georgescu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055155 | Owen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078345 | Mo et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088213 | Poland | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070138157 | Dane et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161898 | Hao et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070161904 | Urbano | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167752 | Proulx et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167824 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070232914 | Chen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238985 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242567 | Daft et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080110261 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080110263 | Klessel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112265 | Urbano et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114241 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114245 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114246 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114247 | Urbano et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114248 | Urbano et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114249 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114250 | Urbana et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114251 | Weymer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114252 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114253 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114255 | Schwartz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125659 | Wilser et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080181479 | Yang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183075 | Govari et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188747 | Randall et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188750 | Randall et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194957 | Hoctor et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194958 | Lee et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194959 | Wang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208061 | Halmann | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080242996 | Hall et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249408 | Palmeri et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255452 | Entrekin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269604 | Boctor et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269613 | Summers et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275344 | Glide-Hurst et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285819 | Konofagou et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287787 | Sauer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294045 | Ellington et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294050 | Shinomura et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294052 | Wilser et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306382 | Guracar et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306386 | Baba et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319317 | Kamiyama et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090010459 | Garbini et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012393 | Choi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016163 | Freeman et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018445 | Schers et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024039 | Wang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036780 | Abraham | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043206 | Towfiq et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048519 | Hossack et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069681 | Lundberg et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069686 | Daft et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069692 | Cooley et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099483 | Rybyanets | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112095 | Daigle | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090131797 | Jeong et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143680 | Yao et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148012 | Altmann et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150094 | Van Velsor et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182237 | Angelsen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198134 | Hashimoto et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090203997 | Ustuner | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090208080 | Grau et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090259128 | Stribling | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264760 | Lazebnik et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090306510 | Hashiba et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326379 | Daigle et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010354 | Skerl et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016725 | Thiele | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063397 | Wagner | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063399 | Walker et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069751 | Hazard et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069756 | Ogasawara et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106431 | Baba et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109481 | Buccafusca | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121193 | Fukukita et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121196 | Hwang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130855 | Lundberg et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100168566 | Bercoff et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168578 | Garson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174194 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191110 | Insana et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217124 | Cooley | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100228126 | Emery et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100240994 | Zheng | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249570 | Carson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249596 | Magee | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256488 | Kim et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262013 | Smith et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100266176 | Masumoto et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268503 | Specht | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100286525 | Osumi | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286527 | Cannon et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100310143 | Rao et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324418 | El-Aklouk et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324423 | El-Aklouk et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100329521 | Beymer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110005322 | Ustuner | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016977 | Guracar | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110021920 | Shafir et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110021923 | Daft et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110033098 | Richter et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044133 | Tokita | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066030 | Yao | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110098565 | Masuzawa | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110112400 | Emery et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112404 | Gourevitch | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125017 | Ramamurthy et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110270088 | Shiina | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301470 | Sato et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306886 | Daft et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319764 | Okada et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120004545 | Ziv-Ari et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120035482 | Kim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036934 | Kröning et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120085173 | Papadopoulos et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095347 | Adam et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101378 | Lee | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120114210 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116226 | Specht | May 2012 | A1 |
20120121150 | Murashita | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137778 | Kitazawa et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120141002 | Urbano et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165670 | Shi et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179044 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120226201 | Clark et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120235998 | Smith-Casem et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120243763 | Wen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253194 | Tamura | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265075 | Pedrizzetti et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277585 | Koenig et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130070062 | Fouras et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076207 | Krohn et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079639 | Hoctor et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130083628 | Qiao et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088122 | Krohn et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130116561 | Rothberg et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131516 | Katsuyama | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144165 | Ebbini et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130144166 | Specht et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130204136 | Duric et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204137 | Roy et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130253325 | Call et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130258805 | Hansen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130261463 | Chiang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140043933 | Belevich et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058266 | Call et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140073921 | Specht et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140086014 | Kobayashi | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140243673 | Anand et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150045668 | Smith et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150080727 | Specht et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160095579 | Smith et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160135783 | Brewer et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160157833 | Smith et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160256134 | Specht et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160354059 | Specht | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1781460 | Jun 2006 | CN |
101116622 | Feb 2008 | CN |
101190134 | Jun 2008 | CN |
102018533 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102123668 | Jul 2011 | CN |
1949856 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2058796 | May 2009 | EP |
2101191 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2182352 | May 2010 | EP |
2198785 | Jun 2010 | EP |
1757955 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2325672 | May 2011 | EP |
1462819 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2356941 | Aug 2011 | EP |
1979739 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2385391 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2294400 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2453256 | May 2012 | EP |
1840594 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2514368 | Oct 2012 | EP |
1850743 | Dec 2012 | EP |
1594404 | Sep 2013 | EP |
2026280 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2851662 | Aug 2004 | FR |
54-44375 | Apr 1979 | JP |
S55-103839 | Aug 1980 | JP |
57-31848 | Feb 1982 | JP |
58-223059 | Dec 1983 | JP |
59-101143 | Jun 1984 | JP |
59-174151 | Oct 1984 | JP |
60-13109 | Jan 1985 | JP |
60-68836 | Apr 1985 | JP |
2-501431 | May 1990 | JP |
03126443 | May 1991 | JP |
04017842 | Jan 1992 | JP |
4-67856 | Mar 1992 | JP |
05-042138 | Feb 1993 | JP |
6-125908 | May 1994 | JP |
7-051266 | Feb 1995 | JP |
7-204201 | Aug 1995 | JP |
08-252253 | Oct 1996 | JP |
9-103429 | Apr 1997 | JP |
9-201361 | Aug 1997 | JP |
2777197 | May 1998 | JP |
10-216128 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11-089833 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11-239578 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2001-507794 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001-245884 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002-209894 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-253548 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-253549 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2004-167092 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-215987 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004-337457 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2004-351214 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-152187 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-523792 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-526539 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006051356 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006-61203 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-122657 | May 2006 | JP |
2006130313 | May 2006 | JP |
2007-325937 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008-122209 | May 2008 | JP |
2008-513763 | May 2008 | JP |
2008132342 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008522642 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-259541 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2008279274 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2010-5375 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010124842 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2010526626 | Aug 2010 | JP |
100715132 | Apr 2007 | KR |
1020090103408 | Oct 2009 | KR |
WO9218054 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO9800719 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO0164109 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO2005009245 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO2006114735 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2007127147 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2009060182 | May 2009 | WO |
WO2010095094 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO2010139519 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO2011004661 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO2011057252 | May 2011 | WO |
WO2011064688 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO2011100697 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO2011123529 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO2012028896 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO2012049124 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012049612 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012078639 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO2012091280 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO2012112540 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO2012131340 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO2012160541 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO2013059358 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO2013109965 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO2013116807 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013116809 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013116851 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013116854 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013116866 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013128301 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Belevich et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/400,826 entitled “Calibration of multiple aperture ultrasound probes,” filed Jan. 6, 2017. |
Davies et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/418,534 entitled “Ultrasound imaging with sparse array probes,” filed Jan. 27, 2017. |
Call et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/500,933 entitled “Network-based ultrasound imaging system,” filed Feb. 1, 2017. |
Abeysekera et al.; Alignment and calibration of dual ultrasound transducers using a wedge phantom; Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; 37(2); pp. 271-279; Feb. 2011. |
Arigovindan et al.; Full motion and flow field recovery from echo doppler data; IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging; 26(1); pp. 31-45; Jan. 2007. |
Capineri et al.; A doppler system for dynamic vector velocity maps; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology; 28(2); pp. 237-248; Feb. 28, 2002. |
Carson et al.; Measurement of photoacoustic transducer position by robotic source placement and nonlinear parameter estimation; Biomedical Optics (BiOS); International Society for Optics and Photonics (9th Conf. on Biomedical Thermoacoustics, Optoacoustics, and Acousto-optics; vol. 6856; 9 pages; Feb. 28, 2008. |
Chen et al.; Maximum-likelihood source localization and unknown sensor location estimation for wideband signals in the near-field; IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing; 50(8); pp. 1843-1854; Aug. 2002. |
Chen et al.; Source localization and tracking of a wideband source using a randomly distributed beamforming sensor array; International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications; 16(3); pp. 259-272; Fall 2002. |
Cristianini et al.; An Introduction to Support Vector Machines; Cambridge University Press; pp. 93-111; Mar. 2000. |
Dunmire et al.; A brief history of vector doppler; Medical Imaging 2001; International Society for Optics and Photonics; pp. 200-214; May 30, 2001. |
Du et al.; User parameter free approaches to multistatic adaptive ultrasound imaging; 5th IEEE International Symposium; pp. 1287-1290, May 2008. |
Feigenbaum, Harvey, M.D.; Echocardiography; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia; 5th Ed.; pp. 482, 484; Feb. 1994. |
Fernandez et al.; High resolution ultrasound beamforming using synthetic and adaptive imaging techniques; Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging; Washington, D.C.; pp. 433-436; Jul. 7-10, 2002. |
Gazor et al.; Wideband multi-source beamforming with array location calibration and direction finding; Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP—95; Detroit, MI; vol. 3 IEEE; pp. 1904-1907; May 9-12, 1995. |
Haykin, Simon; Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation (2nd Ed.); Prentice Hall; pp. 156-187; Jul. 16, 1998. |
Heikkila et al.; A four-step camera calibration procedure with implicit image correction; Proceedings IEEE Computer Scociety Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; San Juan; pp. 1106-1112; Jun. 17-19, 1997. |
Hendee et al.; Medical Imaging Physics; Wiley-Liss, Inc. 4th Edition; Chap. 19-22; pp. 303-353; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) © 2002. |
Hsu et al.; Real-time freehand 3D ultrasound calibration; CUED/F-INFENG/TR 565; Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; 14 pages; Sep. 2006. |
Jeffs; Beamforming: a brief introduction; Brigham Young University; 14 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://ens.ewi.tudelft.nl/Education/courses/et4235/Beamforming.pdf); Oct. 2004. |
Khamene et al.; A novel phantom-less spatial and temporal ultrasound calibration method; Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI (Proceedings 8th Int. Conf.); Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Palm Springs, CA; pp. 65-72; Oct. 26-29, 2005. |
Kramb et al,.; Considerations for using phased array ultrasonics in a fully automated inspection system. Review of Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 23, ed. D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, pp. 817-825, (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 2004. |
Ledesma-Carbayo et al.; Spatio-temporal nonrigid registration for ultrasound cardiac motion estimation; IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging; vol. 24; No. 9; Sep. 2005. |
Leotta et al.; Quantitative three-dimensional echocardiography by rapid imaging . . . ; J American Society of Echocardiography; vol. 10; No. 8; pp. 830-839; Oct. 1997. |
Li et al.; An efficient speckle tracking algorithm for ultrasonic imaging; 24; pp. 215-228; Oct. 1, 2002. |
Morrison et al.; A probabilistic neural network based image segmentation network for magnetic resonance images; Proc. Conf. Neural Networks; Baltimore, MD; vol. 3; pp. 60-65; Jun. 1992. |
Nadkarni et al.; Cardiac motion synchronization for 3D cardiac ultrasound imaging; Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Western Ontario; Jun. 2002. |
Opretzka et al.; A high-frequency ultrasound imaging system combining limited-angle spatial compounding and model-based synthetic aperture focusing; IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE, US; 58(7); pp. 1355-1365; Jul. 2, 2011. |
Press et al.; Cubic spline interpolation; §3.3 in “Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing”, 2nd Ed.; Cambridge, England; Cambridge University Press; pp. 107-110; Sep. 1992. |
Saad et al.; Computer vision approach for ultrasound doppler angle estimation; Journal of Digital Imaging; 22(6); pp. 681-688; Dec. 1, 2009. |
Sakas et al.; Preprocessing and volume rendering of 3D ultrasonic data; IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications; pp. 47-54, Jul. 1995. |
Sapia et al.; Deconvolution of ultrasonic waveforms using an adaptive wiener filter; Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation; vol. 13A; Plenum Press; pp. 855-862; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1994. |
Sapia et al.; Ultrasound image deconvolution using adaptive inverse filtering; 12 IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, CBMS, pp. 248-253; Jun. 1999. |
Sapia, Mark Angelo; Multi-dimensional deconvolution of optical microscope and ultrasound imaging using adaptive least-mean-square (LMS) inverse filtering; Ph.D. Dissertation; University of Connecticut; Jan. 2000. |
Slavine et al.; Construction, calibration and evaluation of a tissue phantom with reproducible optical properties for investigations in light emission tomography; Engineering in Medicine and Biology Workshop; Dallas, TX; IEEE pp. 122-125; Nov. 11-12, 2007. |
Smith et al.; High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging system. 1. Transducer design and beam steering; IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr.; vol. 38; pp. 100-108; Mar. 1991. |
Specht et al.; Deconvolution techniques for digital longitudinal tomography; SPIE; vol. 454; presented at Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine XII; pp. 319-325; Jun. 1984. |
Specht et al.; Experience with adaptive PNN and adaptive GRNN; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. on Neural Networks; vol. 2; pp. 1203-1208; Orlando, FL; Jun. 1994. |
Specht, D.F.; A general regression neural network; IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks; vol. 2.; No. 6; Nov. 1991. |
Specht, D.F.; Blind deconvolution of motion blur using LMS inverse filtering; Lockheed Independent Research (unpublished); Jun. 23, 1975. |
Specht, D.F.; Enhancements to probabilistic neural networks; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. on Neural Networks; Baltimore, MD; Jun. 1992. |
Specht, D.F.; GRNN with double clustering; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. Neural Networks; Vancouver, Canada; Jul. 16-21, 2006. |
Specht, D.F.; Probabilistic neural networks; Pergamon Press; Neural Networks; vol. 3; pp. 109-118; Feb. 1990. |
UCLA Academic Technology; SPSS learning module: How can I analyze a subset of my data; 6 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/spss/modules/subset_analyze.htm) Nov. 26, 2001. |
Urban et al; Implementation of vibro-acoustography on a clinical ultrasound system; IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control; 58(6); pp. 1169-1181 (Author Manuscript, 25 pgs.); Jun. 2011. |
Urban et al; Implementation of vibro-acoustography on a clinical ultrasound system; IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS); pp. 326-329; Oct. 14, 2010. |
Von Ramm et al.; High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging—System. 2. Parallel processing and image display; IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr.; vol. 38; pp. 109-115; Mar. 1991. |
Wang et al.; Photoacoustic tomography of biological tissues with high cross-section resolution: reconstruction and experiment; Medical Physics; 29(12); pp. 2799-2805; Dec. 2002. |
Wells, P.N.T.; Biomedical ultrasonics; Academic Press; London, New York, San Francisco; pp. 124-125; Mar. 1977. |
Widrow et al.; Adaptive signal processing; Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ; pp. 99-116; Mar. 1985. |
Wikipedia; Point cloud; 2 pages; retrieved Nov. 24, 2014 from the internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Point_cloud&oldid=472583138). |
Wikipedia; Curve fitting; 5 pages; retrieved from the internet (http:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve_fitting) Dec. 19, 2010. |
Wikipedia; Speed of sound; 17 pages; retrieved from the internet (http:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound) Feb. 15, 2011. |
Yang et al.; Time-of-arrival calibration for improving the microwave breast cancer imaging; 2011 IEEE Topical Conf. on Biomedical Wireless Technologies, Networks, and sensing Systems (BioWireleSS); Phoenix, AZ; pp. 67-70; Jan. 16-19, 2011. |
Zhang et al.; A high-frequency high frame rate duplex ultrasound linear array imaging system for small animal imaging; IEEE transactions on ultrasound, ferroelectrics, and frequency control; 57(7); pp. 1548-1567; Jul. 2010. |
Specht et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/364,075 entitled “Point source transmission and speed-of-sound correction using multi-aperture ultrasound imaging,” filed Nov. 29, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170074982 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61780366 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14210015 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 15364092 | US |