Alignment of ultrasound transducer arrays and multiple aperture probe assembly

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9510806
  • Patent Number
    9,510,806
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 13, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 6, 2016
    7 years ago
Abstract
The effective aperture of an ultrasound imaging probe can be increased by including more than one transducer array and using the transducer elements of all of the arrays to render an image can greatly improve the lateral resolution of the generated image. In order to render an image, the relative positions of all of the elements must be known precisely. Systems and methods for accurately calibrating and adjusting a multi-aperture ultrasound system are disclosed. The relative positions of the transducer elements can be computed and aligned prior to and during probe assembly.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


FIELD

The present invention relates generally to imaging techniques, and more particularly to ultrasound imaging, and still more particularly to systems and methods for calibration and quality assurance measurement of ultrasound probes, particularly probes having multiple apertures.


BACKGROUND

In conventional (scanline-based) ultrasonic imaging, a focused beam of ultrasound energy (a scanline) is transmitted into body tissues to be examined and echoes returning along the same scanline are detected and plotted. A complete image may be formed by combining multiple scanlines. While ultrasound has been used extensively for diagnostic purposes, conventional scanline-based ultrasound has been greatly limited by depth of scanning, speckle noise, poor lateral resolution, obscured tissues and other problems.


Significant improvements have been made in the field of ultrasound imaging with the creation of multiple aperture imaging, some examples of which are shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,439 titled “Method and Apparatus to Produce Ultrasonic images Using Multiple Apertures,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/029,907, filed Feb. 18, 2010, titled ″Point Source Transmission and Speed-Of-Sound Correction Using Multiple-Aperture Ultrasound Imaging, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/760,375, filed Apr. 4, 2010, titled “Universal Multiple Aperture Medical Ultrasound Probe,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/760,327, titled “Multiple Aperture Ultrasound Array Alignment Fixture,” all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Multiple aperture imaging methods and systems allow for ultrasound signals to be both transmitted and received from separate apertures.


Ultrasound probes constructed to perform multiple aperture ultrasound imaging typically contain multiple separate transducer arrays. During construction of such a probe, the multiple arrays need to be aligned in a common imaging plane and in a desired orientation relative to one another. Some methods of performing such alignment and construction are shown and described in U.S. patent appliation Ser. No. 12/760,327. Room for further improvement remains.


SUMMARY

In one embodiment, a method of building a multiple aperture ultrasound probe is provided, the method comprising the steps of forming a gasket with a first flowable solidifying material on a lower surface of a precision alignment element, securing the precision alignment element to a back surface of a transducer array with the gasket, evaluating and adjusting alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element, and injecting a second flowable solidifying material through at least one hole in the precision alignment element to secure the transducer array to the precision alignment element.


In some embodiments, the injecting step comprises filling a volume defined by the back surface of the transducer array, the lower surface of the precision alignment element, and an inner surface of the gasket with the second flowable solidifying material.


In some embodiments, the method further comprises allowing the second flowable solidifying material to solidify, and mounting the precision alignment element to a probe alignment bracket.


In alternative embodiments, the method further comprises placing the probe alignment bracket into a probe housing, and injecting a third flowable solidifying material into a space between the transducer array and the probe housing.


In other embodiments, the injected third flowable solidifying material surrounds at least a portion of the precision alignment element or the probe alignment bracket.


In one embodiment, evaluating alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element comprises imaging a target with the transducer array and comparing a resulting image of the target with known information defining a geometry of the target.


In some embodiments, the target comprises a plurality of pins oriented in a known configuration relative to the precision alignment element.


In other embodiments, each of the pins has a flat surface substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the pins, the longitudinal axis being substantially perpendicular to an ultrasound wavefront transmitted from a single element of the transducer array and arriving at the pins.


In some embodiments, adjusting alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element comprises adjusting at least one set screw to mechanically move the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element.


In some embodiments, the method further comprises allowing the first flowable solidifying material to solidify prior to evaluating and adjusting alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element.


In additional embodiments, the first flowable solidifying material and the second flowable solidifying material are the same material.


In one embodiment, the pins are oriented with longitudinal axes that intersect at a single point.


A method of evaluating an alignment of an ultrasound transducer array relative to a precision alignment element is also provided, the method comprising the steps of flexibly securing the ultrasound transducer array to the precision alignment element, mounting the precision alignment element in a fixed, known position and orientation relative to a target, the target having a plurality of reflectors in known reflector positions, imaging the reflectors of the target with the array, comparing imaged reflector positions with known reflector positions, and identifying a corrective adjustment based on the comparing step.


In some embodiments, the method further comprises comparing a brightness of the reflectors with expected brightness values.


In other embodiments, the method further comprises visually comparing imaged reflector positions with known reflector positions using a graphical user interface in which a first image comprising the imaged reflector positions is displayed simultaneously with a second image comprising the known reflector positions.


In alternative embodiments, the graphical user interface further comprises a graphical representation of a brightness of imaged reflectors within a predetermined radius of the known reflector positions.


An ultrasound probe alignment system is provided, comprising a tank assembly comprising an ultrasound conducting material, an array affixing and adjusting assembly at least partially within the tank assembly, the array affixing and adjusting assembly supporting a precision alignment element in a known position and orientation relative to a target assembly, the target assembly being disposed in the tank assembly and comprising at least one reflector configured to reflect an ultrasound signal.


Some embodiments further comprise a height adjustment assembly configured to adjust a distance between the array affixing and adjusting assembly and the target assembly.


In other embodiments, the target assembly comprises a plurality of pins arranged so as to be coincident with a precisely aligned imaging plane of the ultrasound probe alignment system.


In some embodiments, the pins are arranged so as to be displaced from one another in two dimensions in the imaging plane of the ultrasound probe alignment system.


In one embodiment, the pins vary in length so as to lie on multiple different points of the imaging plane of the ultrasound probe alignment system.


In alternative embodiments, the plurality of pins comprises a center pin and at least one pair of pins equidistant from the center pin.


In other embodiments, the array affixing and adjusting assembly comprises structures for adjusting an orientation of an ultrasound transducer array relative to the precision alignment element.


A multiple aperture ultrasound probe is provided, comprising a probe housing, a first transducer array secured to a first precision alignment element by a layer of a solidified polymer material, the first precision alignment element comprising a first plate secured to a back surface of the first transducer array, the first precision alignment element being secured to a probe bracket of the probe housing, a second transducer array secured to a second precision alignment element by a layer of a solidified polymer material, the second precision alignment element comprising a second plate secured to a back surface of the second transducer array, the second precision alignment element being secured to the probe bracket of the probe housing, and a filler solidified polymer material disposed in a space between the first and second transducer arrays and the probe housing.


In some embodiments, the first and second arrays are precisely aligned relative to the first and second precision alignment elements, respectively.


In other embodiments, the first precision alignment element comprises a plate having at least one hole through which a quantity of solidified polymer material extends.


In one embodiment, the plate comprises two holes, at least one of which has a quantity of solidified polymer material extending therethrough.


In some embodiments, the first precision alignment element is secured to a single surface of the first transducer array.


In additional embodiments, the first precision alignment element is secured to the probe bracket by a plurality of mechanical fasteners.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a fully assembled multiple aperture ultrasound imaging probe.



FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of a high-level process for aligning transducer arrays during assembly of a multiple aperture ultrasound probe.



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a fixture assembly and a target for aligning a transducer array.



FIG. 4 is an exploded view of an embodiment of the adjustment assembly section of the fixture assembly of FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of an embodiment of an alignment target made up of a plurality of pins.



FIG. 6 is an exploded view of an embodiment of a transducer array, a gasket element, and a precision alignment element.



FIG. 7 is a perspective view of an embodiment of the lower side of the precision alignment element of FIG. 6.



FIG. 8 is a perspective view of an embodiment of jig for establishing the thickness of the gasket of FIG. 6.



FIG. 9 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a transducer array mounted in an adjustment assembly.



FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of an imaging controller for use with some embodiments of the alignment systems and methods herein.



FIG. 11A is an illustration of an embodiment of an array alignment display screen showing an image of an array that is out of alignment.



FIG. 11B is an illustration of an embodiment of an array alignment display screen showing an image of an array that is well-aligned.



FIG. 12 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a probe alignment bracket for use in supporting transducer arrays in a designed orientation relative to a probe housing and relative to one another.



FIG. 13 is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of a completed multiple aperture ultrasound probe assembled using the systems and methods described herein.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following disclosure provides embodiments of systems and methods for constructing accurately aligned multiple aperture ultrasound probes. Some embodiments provide systems and methods for checking, adjusting, and securing the alignment of an individual array relative to a precision alignment element (PAE). Some embodiments provide systems and methods for mechanically aligning and affixing multiple transducer arrays in a desired alignment relative to one another and relative to a probe housing.


It is important that ultrasound probes to be used in high resolution multiple aperture ultrasound imaging be precisely constructed such that each of a plurality of transducer arrays be precisely aligned along a common imaging plane. It is further important that such arrays be mounted within a probe housing at a precise angle, orientation and position relative to each other and relative to the probe housing itself


As used herein, references to the “exact” or “precise” position of transducer elements (and similar terms) may imply a relatively tight tolerance. For example, in some embodiments ultrasound probe calibration systems and methods may provide information describing the acoustic position of each transducer element in an array to within a distance of a fraction of a wavelength of ultrasound being used. In some embodiments, the acoustic position of transducer elements may be determined to within 1/10 of a wavelength. In other embodiments, the acoustic position of transducer elements may be determined to within a tolerance of less than 1/10 of a wavelength. In some embodiments, such as for calibrating a standard (i.e., single aperture) ultrasound probe, much looser tolerances may also be used, provided that such tolerances meet the needs of a particular system.


Conventional ultrasound (or “scanline based” ultrasound as used herein) utilizes a phased array controller to produce and steer a substantially linear transmit waveform groups. In order to produce a B-mode image, a sequence of such linear waveform groups (or “scanlines”) may be produced and steered so as to scan across a region of interest. Echoes are received along each respective scanline in a process known as receive beamforming. The echoes received along the individual scanlines may then be combined to form a complete image.


In a ping-based imaging process, an unfocused circular wavefront is transmitted from a point source transmitter, and the echoes are received by a plurality of receive transducers. The received echoes may then be beamfoimed using a ping-based beamforming process in order to determine a display location for each reflector that returns an echo. Beamforming is generally understood to be a process by which imaging signals received at multiple discrete receptors are combined to form a complete coherent image. The process of ping-based beamforming is consistent with this understanding.


Embodiments of ping-based beamforming generally involve determining the position of reflectors corresponding to portions of received echo data based on the path along which an ultrasound signal may have traveled, an assumed-constant speed of sound and the elapsed time between a transmit ping and the time at which an echo is received. In other words, ping-based imaging involves a calculation of distance based on an assumed speed and a measured time. Once such a distance has been calculated, it is possible to triangulate the possible positions of any given reflector. This distance calculation is made possible with accurate information about the relative positions of transmit and receive transducer elements. Further details of ping-based imaging are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/029,907 referenced above.


Embodiments of Alignment Array Fixtures And Assemblies



FIG. 1 illustrates an assembled multiple aperture ultrasound probe 10. The probe 10 of FIG. 1 includes three separate transducer arrays 12A, 12B, 12C, each of which may be secured (or “potted”) in a precise desired position and orientation within a probe housing 14. In some embodiments, the arrays may be potted in the probe housing 14 with a flowable solidifying material such as a room temperature vulcanizing (RTV) silicone rubber or any other similarly suitable epoxy or polymerizing material. RTV silicone is particularly suitable due to its thermal and mechanical properties, but other materials with similar properties may also be used. Generally any reference herein to a “flowable solidifying material,” a “solidifying polymer material,” a “flowable hardening material” or an “acoustic damping material” may refer to any suitable material that transitions from a liquid to a solid by a curing, drying or polymerizing process. Such materials may include RTV silicone, two-part epoxy resins, or others.


In general, it may be desirable for a flowable solidifying material to have properties in its solid state that are similar to properties of a medium to be imaged and similar to a lens material attached to a manufactured transducer array (which may also be specified for particular applications). RTV silicone is well-suited to medical applications while more rigid materials, such as hard-curing epoxies or a metal-impregnated epoxies may be well-suited to non-destructive testing applications. In still further embodiments, a flowable solidifying material may be a phase-changing material. For example, a molten plastic may be flowed as needed, and then allowed to solidify by cooling to a temperature below a melting point.


In various alternative embodiments, multiple aperture probes may be constructed with 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more individual transducer arrays in a common housing. In some embodiments, all transducer arrays in a probe may be oriented in a common imaging plane. In other embodiments, some arrays may be aligned in multiple imaging planes so as to facilitate 3D or 4D imaging. Generally, multiple aperture probes are designed with relatively tight tolerances for the position and orientation of arrays within the probe housing. In order to meet these tolerances while assembling a probe, an alignment and affixing process may be needed.



FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a process 20 for aligning one or more arrays relative to a precision alignment element (PAE) and affixing the one or more arrays to the PAE. The process 20 of FIG. 2 may begin with the step of mounting an array to a PAE 22 in such a way as to allow for the position and/or orientation of the array to be adjusted relative to the PAE. The PAE may then be mounted 24 to an alignment/adjustment assembly. Using the alignment / adjustment assembly, the alignment of the array relative to the PAE may be tested 26. The result of the test may be evaluated 28 to determine whether the array is sufficiently aligned with the PAE. If the testing 26 reveals that the alignment of the array relative to the PAE is outside of a desired tolerance 30, then the array's alignment may be adjusted 32, and the alignment may be re-tested 26. Once the array is determined to be aligned with the PAE to within a desired degree of precision 34, the array may be more permanently affixed to the precision alignment assembly 36. The aligned array & PAE assembly may then be mounted to a probe alignment bracket 38, and when all such PAE/array assemblies are mounted to the probe bracket, the entire assembly may be placed into a probe housing 40, and the entire assembly may be permanently potted into the probe housing 42. The embodiments of various structures that may be used for such a process will now be described before describing further detailed embodiments of an alignment process 20.



FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of an alignment and adjustment assembly 50. In the illustrated embodiment, the assembly 50 may include a tank-affixing section 52, an array affixing and adjusting assembly 54, and a target assembly 56. The assembly 50 of FIG. 3 may be generally configured such that a PAE 60 may be supported in a known precisely aligned position and orientation relative to a target to be imaged, such as pins 66, 66T. The orientation of an array 62 attached to the PAE 60 may be tested by imaging the target 56 (or more particularly pins 66, 66T in some embodiments) using the array 62 and evaluating the resulting image (as described in further detail below). If the array 62 is found to be out of alignment, the orientation of the array 62 relative to the PAE 60 may be adjusted using the adjustment assembly 54 (as described in further detail below with reference to FIG. 9).


In the illustrated embodiment, the PAE 60 may be secured to the assembly 54 by arms 57. In alternative embodiments, any number of other structures may also be used depending on the shape and configuration of the PAE and other portions of the alignment assembly 50. In other embodiments, the PAE 60 may also include further structures and features designed to enable precise alignment of the PAE 60 with components of the assembly 54. An Adjustment cover 61 may also be provided to surround the array 62, and to provide structure for a plurality of adjustment screws 63.


In some such embodiments, the alignment assembly 50 of FIG. 3 may be configured to allow the distance between the array 62 and the target 56 to be increased or decreased by known amounts. For example, the array affixing and adjusting assembly 54 may be mountable at a plurality of discrete locations 59 relative to the target assembly 56. In alternative embodiments, a continuously variable height adjustment mechanism, such as a rack and pinion (or any other suitable mechanism) may be used to vary the height of the probe affixing assembly 54 relative to the target 56.


In some embodiments, all or part of the assembly 50 may be mounted relative to a tank containing a liquid bath such that at least the target assembly 56 and the emitting surface of the transducer array 62 may be submerged in a liquid medium with a known consistent speed of sound (e.g., water, gel, oil or other material as described in further detail below). In various embodiments, the tank-affixing section 52 may include any structure for affixing the assembly 50 relative to a water tank such that at least the array transducers 60 and the target 56 are submerged.


In other embodiments, the water tank may be omitted. For example, a target assembly 56 may be encased within a solid material with a known consistent speed-of-sound (e.g., RTV silicone, ballistic gelatin, or any other solid elastic material suitable for use in ultrasound phantoms), and the transducer array 60 to be aligned may be acoustically coupled to a surface of the target assembly by an acoustic coupling gel or a conformable bladder containing a liquid or gel. In such embodiments, the material in which the target is encased may be selected based on the frequency and style of array under test. For example, whereas medical transducers are designed in the 1 to 18 MHz area, ideal target-encasing materials may have similar characteristics to human tissue. On the other hand, a transducer to be used in non-destructive testing (NDT) of industrial materials may be designed to operate at substantially higher frequencies in order to evaluate metals and composites. Some NDT arrays may also be air-coupled, doing its job without ever touching the work surface. Such devices typically work at much lower frequencies. A coupling medium is a bridge to allow energy of an appropriate frequency to travel back and forth from the testing array to the object under test (e.g., a phantom containing an alignment target). In the case of medical arrays and some low frequency NDT arrays, a coupling medium may include compatible gels, lotions, oils or water depending on the materials to be imaged. Higher frequency NDT arrays might use water, oil or a combination of liquids as a coupling medium. In some embodiments, a coupling medium may comprise a flexible bladder or pad of a material with suitable properties.



FIG. 4 provides an exploded view further illustrating components of the array affixing and adjusting assembly 54 of FIG. 3. The array-holding assembly 54 may be secured in a consistent and known position and orientation relative to the target assembly 56. Thus, depending on the shape and nature of the target assembly, various structures may be used to maintain the array-holder 54 in a known position relative to the target assembly. In the embodiment of FIGS. 3 and 4, the target assembly 56 may be secured to the array holder assembly 54 with rigid arms 58. Any other alternative structures may also be used.



FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of a target assembly 56 that may be used in an alignment process. In various embodiments, the target assembly 56 may include any structure with a known configuration of acoustic reflectors. A target 56 for use with an alignment process may generally have a pattern of reflectors that will allow for a clear indication of the array's alignment relative to the target 56. Targets ideal for an alignment process are those that include a plurality of reflectors (or holes) that lie in a precise known pattern in a single plane that may be precisely aligned with the intended imaging plane of the array. For example, the target assembly 56 shown in FIGS. 3-5 comprises a plurality of pins 66 (labeled as pins 66A-D and T in FIG. 5) arranged such that all of the pins 66 lie in a common plane that is coincident with the precisely aligned imaging plane.


As best seen in FIG. 5, the pins 66A-D and T may vary in length such that the tips of the pins may lie on multiple different points in the intended image plane (i.e., at different heights relative to a plane perpendicular to the imaging plane). In some embodiments, the pins may be oriented at angles such each pin's flat surface end may be oriented perpendicular to an arriving waveform transmitted from the array. In some embodiments, such angles may be selected assuming pings are transmitted from an origin at the center point of the array, even if pings are to be transmitted from multiple transmit elements at different locations on the array.


In some embodiments, target pins may be arranged in a common imaging plane and oriented at angles such that longitudinal axes of the pins intersect at a single point near the transducer array (e.g., above the transducer array's transmitting surface in some embodiments). For example, in some embodiments, pins furthest from a center pin (the end pins) may be oriented such that, with the target positioned at a minimum distance from the array, the end pins lie at a desired angle relative to the precision alignment element. For example, the end pins may be oriented at an angle of about 30 degrees relative to a line perpendicular to the precision alignment element in the imaging plane. Larger or smaller angles may be desirable depending on an angle of sensitivity of transducer elements in transducer arrays to be aligned.


When imaged by a transducer array to be aligned, each pin may appear as a dot. In this target configuration, each pin may appear as a dot in a known location on a display when the target is imaged by an aligned array supported in the array holder assembly.


In some embodiments, a target 56 may include a plurality of reflectors positioned so as to evaluate the array's alignment at various discrete distances from the target. For example, a target may include a center pin 66T and a plurality of pairs 66A-66D of pins laterally spaced equal distances from the center pin 66T. In various embodiments, a target may include any number of pairs of laterally-spaced pins. In some embodiments, the pairs of pins may be provided in a range of different lengths, meaning that some pairs of pins are closer to the transducer array than others. In various embodiments, alignment of an array may be evaluated at various distances from the target. In some embodiments, pin lengths may be calculated so as to place the faces of each pair of pins and the center pin 66T coincident with an arc of a transmitted wavefront at a selected depth.


In some embodiments, different reflectors of the target 56 may be configured and used for evaluating the array's alignment at different distances from the target 56 and/or for evaluating the array transmitting at different frequencies. For example, the target shown in FIG. 5 may include several pairs of reflectors of different lengths to be imaged at different vertical distances between the array and the target. As shown, the first pair of reflectors 66A may be configured for evaluating an array's alignment at a target-distance of about 1.5 cm, the second pair 66B of reflectors may be configured for evaluating an array's alignment at a target-distance of about 3.0 cm, the third pair 66C may be configured for evaluating an array's alignment at a target-distance of about 4.5 cm, and the fifth pair 66D may be configured for evaluating an array's alignment at a target-distance of about 6.0 cm. In alternative embodiments, targets may be configured for testing an array at any distance as desired.


In further alternative embodiments, the target 56 may include phantom structures with reflectors made of any suitable ultrasonically-reflecting material in a variety of alternative configurations. For example, the target may comprise a plurality of small sphere-shaped reflectors embedded in a solid material. Generally, a target may include any number of reflectors made of an appropriate echogenic material, as determined by the frequency and array style, that provides a small reflective surface relative to the wave length of the sound being used. Such reflective objects may be encased in precisely known locations in a sonolucent material. The sonolucent material to be used may be selected to be similar to conditions to be experienced by the array in an intended application. As such, in some cases, a sonolucent material may or may not offer attenuation. Reflectors in a target assembly need not be arranged in a symmetrical pattern, but preferably include multiple points at multiple different known locations such that alignment may be evaluated. The target may generally include any pattern of reflectors which may be supported within a solid, liquid or gaseous medium (depending on the intended use application). In some embodiments, a target may also include one or more “holes”—regions or objects that substantially absorb and do not reflect significant ultrasound signals. In some embodiments it may be desirable for reflectors or holes to be aligned in a single plane that is may be aligned with the ideal imaging plane.


In some alternative embodiments, a target may include any substantially static object that may be imaged with an ultrasound probe. For example, any number of phantoms designed for sonographer training are widely commercially available from various suppliers of medical equipment. Some commercially available phantoms are made to mimic the imaging characteristics of objects to be imaged such as specific or generic human tissues. Such properties may or may not be used in combination with various embodiments described herein. An object need not be purpose-built as a phantom to be used as a phantom for the alignment processes described herein.


As shown in FIG. 6, in some embodiments, the PAE 60 may include a plate 70 with precisely positioned mounting holes 72 precisely arranged for attachment to the holder 54. For example, in some embodiments the PAE 60 may include two alignment mounting holes 72 configured to mount the PAE 60 to mounting arms 57 of the adjustment assembly (shown in FIGS. 3 and 4). The PAE 60 may further include corner holes 74A-74D for receiving set screws and for mounting the PAE 60 to a probe alignment bracket in a final probe assembly (e.g., as described below with reference to FIG. 12). In some embodiments, temporary set screws in the corner holes 74A-74D may also be used to adjust the position of an array relative to the PAE during an alignment procedure as described in further detail below. In some embodiments, the corner holes 74A-74D may be tapped with fine pitch threads.


In alternative embodiments, a precision alignment element may be provided in a variety of different structures, and may include any suitable features to ensure and/or to verify accurate and precise positioning of the PAE 60 relative to the target 56. For example, the PAE may include holes, pins, recesses or other structures configured to engage (or to be engaged by) corresponding structures on a holder assembly. In general, a precision alignment element (or PAE) may be any structure that may be mounted in a known precise position relative to a target in an alignment test assembly. Similarly, alternative holder assembly structures may include clamps, screws, pins, holes, recesses and various other mechanical structures configured to engage corresponding portions of a PAE and to hold a PAE in a consistent known position and orientation relative to a target.


In some embodiments, precision alignment features may be integrated into a probe alignment bracket (such as that described below with reference to FIG. 12. In such embodiments, a probe alignment bracket configured to support transducer arrays in a desired orientation relative to one another may include array-mounting sections, gasket-supporting sections and holes for injecting a flowable solidifying material once an array is aligned. In such some embodiments, a plurality of targets may be provided such that each array has a corresponding target arranged perpendicular to the aligned array plane. Alternatively, a target or a PAE holder may be adjustable so as to position the bracket PAE and the target(s) in a perpendicular orientation.



FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a PAE 60 and a gasket 76 for adjustably securing the PAE 60 to a transducer array 62. In some embodiments, the PAE 60 may comprise a plate with a lower surface 78 sized and configured to be bonded to a back surface 80 of a transducer array.


As shown in FIG. 7, in some embodiments the lower surface 78 of the PAE 60 may include a recessed section 81. The recessed section 81 may be machined (or otherwise formed) to a precise depth and dimensions for creating a gasket 76. In some embodiments, a gasket 76 may be formed by extruding a bead or injecting a flow of a liquid or flowable solidifying material (e.g., RTV silicone, epoxy or other flowable solidifying material) around the perimeter of the recessed section 81 on the lower surface 78 of the PAE 60. In some embodiments, before the solidifying material cures, the PAE 60 and the gasket 76 may be pressed onto the back surface 81 of the transducer array 62.


In some embodiments, a jig 82, such as that shown in FIG. 8, may be used to ensure that the gasket 76 is compressed to a consistent thickness. Using the jig 82, a consistent desired gasket thickness may be achieved by placing the PAE 62 in the provided slot 84, and then placing the transducer array 62 into the space above the PAE 62 until it abuts the shoulders 86 such that the height of the shoulders 86 above the PAE's lower surface 78 ensures a consistent spacing between the lower surface 78 of the PAE 60 and the back surface 80 of the transducer array 62.


It is generally desirable for the gasket to secure the PAE to the array while remaining somewhat flexible, allowing a small degree of movement between the PAE and the array during the alignment and adjustment process. Such flexibility may be achieved through selection of an appropriate flowable solidifying material and/or selecting a gasket thickness and width that allows sufficient flexibility. Alternatively, flexibility of the gasket may be achieved by performing the adjustment process before a hardening material completely cures.


In some embodiments, the PAE 60 and array 62 may be held within the jig 82 for a sufficient time for the gasket material to cure. Once cured, the PAE 62 will be temporarily secured to the back surface 80 of the transducer array 62 by the gasket, while allowing a small range of movement between the PAE 60 and the array 62. Although the use of a jig may provide a certain degree of precision to the assembly, the actual acoustic position of the transducer elements may not necessarily be precisely consistent with the physical back surface 80 of the transducer array 62 simply due to inevitable manufacturing variability.


In some embodiments, the PAE 60 may also include features and structures configured to facilitate precise alignment of the PAE 60 and an attached transducer array 62 with elements of a final probe assembly. For example, as shown in FIG. 6, the plate 70 may also include a plurality of holes 74A-74D precisely positioned for precisely mounting the alignment element 60 to a probe alignment bracket as will be described in further detail below with reference to FIG. 12. In some embodiments, the plate 70 may also include one or more channels 92 precisely sized oriented to engage corresponding structures in a probe alignment bracket.


In some embodiments, the PAE 60 may include one or more injection holes 94 through which a flowable solidifying material may be injected once the transducer array is determined to be perfectly aligned with the PAE (as will be described in further detail below with reference to FIG. 9). The PAE 60 may also include a relief 96 surrounding the injection holes 94 to prevent any overflowing affixing material from interfering with the fit of the PAE in a probe alignment bracket (as described in further detail below).



FIG. 9 illustrates an array 62 to be aligned to a precision alignment element 60 and mounted in an adjustment assembly 54. The adjustment assembly 54 may generally include one or more adjustment mechanisms configured to move the array 62 relative to the PAE 60. In the illustrated embodiment, a plurality of set screws 63A-63C may be provided as adjustment mechanisms. A spring 98 (or other resilient material or device) may also be provided to mechanically bias the array towards the adjustment mechanisms so as to maintain contact between the array 62 and the set screws 63A-63C. In some embodiments, a point-contact device may be positioned between the spring 98 and the array 62. A point-contact device may be any structure that creates a small point of contact with the array, such as a pin, a nail, a sphere, a cone, or otherwise shaped structures. Any number of set screws in any desired arrangement may be used to adjust the position of the array 62 relative to the PAE 60.



FIG. 9 illustrates several set screws 63A-63C for adjusting the position of the array 62 relative to the PAE. The six adjustment set screws in the front surface of the adjustment cover 61 may be used for adjusting the position of the array by displacing a portion of the array in the Y direction. For example, tightening the bottom of the center screws 63B will tend to cause the array to pivot about the longitudinal axis 102, while tightening the right-side screws 63C or the left-side screws 63A will tend to cause the array 62 to pivot about the vertical axis 106. Tightening all of the front screws (or at least the top left and right side screws) may cause the array 62 to translate along the elevation axis 104. In some embodiments, adjustment set screws may also be used in one or more of the four corner holes 74A-74C in the PAE 60. Tightening a set screw in the screw right rear hole 74B will tend to cause the array to pivot about the longitudinal axis and the elevation axis. Thus, depending on the degree and the direction of misalignment detected during a testing step, one or more set screws may be adjusted until a desired adjustment of the array's position relative to the PAE 60 is achieved.


In various embodiments, ribbon connectors extending from the array may be electrically connected to a controller in order to transmit and/or receive ultrasonic signals using the transducer array. Any suitable connector may be used for achieving such electrical connections.


Alignment Imaging Controller Embodiments



FIG. 10 illustrates a block diagram of a controller 200 that may be used for controlling, transmitting, and receiving of ultrasound signals using the transducer array 62 during an alignment process. The controller 200 may also be configured to generate and display images based on the received echo data. In some embodiments, the controller 200 may further be configured to store raw echo data for later retrieval and analysis.


As shown in FIG. 10, a controller 200 may electronically and logically connected to a transducer array 202 to be aligned. In some embodiments, at least some of the transducer elements may be designated as transmit elements, while others may be designated as receive elements. In some embodiments, each transducer element may convert ultrasound vibrations into time-varying electrical signals and vice versa. In various embodiments, the array 62 to be aligned to a PAE may include any number of ultrasound transducer elements in any desired configuration.


The controller 200 may contain software and hardware elements configured to control an imaging process. In various embodiments of the alignment methods described herein, any imaging method (e.g., ping-based imaging, scanline-based imaging or any other available ultrasound imaging method) may be used for imaging the target assembly. Due to the use of transducer element position in ping-based beamforming methods, such methods may be particularly suited for an alignment evaluation process.


The transmission of ultrasound signals from elements of the array 62 may be controlled by a transmit controller 204. Upon receiving echoes of transmit signals, the transducer elements may generate time-varying electric signals corresponding to the received ultrasound vibrations. Signals representing the received echoes may be output from the array 62 and sent to a receive subsystem 210. In some embodiments, the receive subsystem may include multiple channels (e.g., one channel for each transducer element in some embodiments). Each channel may include an analog front-end device (“AFE”) 212 and an analog-to-digital conversion device (“ADC”) 214. In some embodiments, each channel of the receive subsystem 210 may also include digital filters and data conditioners (not shown) after the ADC 214. In some embodiments, analog filters prior to the ADC 214 may also be provided. In some embodiments, the output of each ADC 214 may be directed into a raw data memory device 220. Notably, the controller 200 need not include a scan converter for systems configured to use a ping-based imaging method.


In some embodiments, raw echo data may be stored in a raw data memory device 220 prior to any beamforming or image formation. In some embodiments, echo data may be passed directly from a receive subsystem 210 to an image formation sub-system 230.


The image formation sub-system 230 may include a beamformer 232 and an image layer combiner (“ILC”) 234. If needed, image data may be temporarily stored in an image buffer memory device 236. In some embodiments, the image formation subsystem may retrieve stored echo data from the raw data memory device rather than receiving real-time echo data from the receive sub-system. The beamformer 232 may include or may have logical access to a memory device 238 containing transducer element position data. In the case of a new un-aligned and un-calibrated transducer array, such transducer element position data may be based on an idealized case for transducer arrays of a particular type. Alternatively, the transducer element position data may be based on calibration analysis of a plurality of previously-aligned arrays.


An alignment overlay subsystem 235 may include stored data including information describing known positions of reflectors in the target 56. In some embodiments, such an alignment overlay sub-system may include information for several targets which may be selectable by a user depending on which target is to be used. The alignment overlay subsystem may also include hardware and software for forming an image of expected reflector positions and additional information for assisting in assessing the alignment of a transducer array under examination.


The controller 200 may be further configured to output image data to a display sub-system 240. A display subsystem 240 may include a video processor 242 for performing various digital video image processing steps, a video memory 246 for storing “cine loop” data (e.g., processed video clips), and a display controller 244 configured to output image pixels to a display device.


Array Alignment Testing and Adjustment Method Embodiments


Thus, returning to the process diagram of FIG. 2, an embodiment of a process for aligning a transducer array 62 relative to a PAE 60 using an alignment apparatus such as that shown in FIGS. 3-6 will now be described. Once a PAE 60 has been temporarily mounted to an array 62 with a gasket 76, the PAE 60 and array 62 may be mounted in the adjustment section 54 of an alignment assembly 50. Ribbon connectors extending from the array 62 may then be electronically connected to an alignment imaging controller 200. In some embodiments, the degree of alignment (or misalignment) may then be tested by imaging the target assembly 56 with the array 62.


Because the position of the pin tips 66 may be known with a high degree of precision, the expected image produced by a perfectly-aligned array may be predicted with a high degree of precision. Thus, the actual obtained image may be compared with the theoretically ideal image, and the alignment of the array may be quantitatively and/or qualitatively evaluated. In some embodiments, such a qualitative comparison may be performed visually by a user. In order to assist in visually comparing the actual image with the theoretical image, a software layer may be configured to overlay a schematic representation of the theoretical image with the actual image. In some embodiments, the two images may be displayed in contrasting colors to further aid in distinguishing the actual image from the theoretical image.



FIGS. 11A and 11B illustrate an embodiment of an actual image of a target with five reflectors in precisely known positions. The reflector images are indicated by the amorphous-shaped patterns 110A-110E, and an overlaid theoretical image is indicated by the circles 112A-112E. FIG. 11A illustrates an example of an actual image that is misaligned with the target (and therefore, the array 62 is misaligned with the PAE 60, since the PAE 60 is known to be precisely aligned with the target). In some embodiments, a bar graph 114 (and/or a numerical value, a line graph or other quantitative visual information) may be displayed along with the theoretically correct image. Each bar of the bar graph 114 may indicate the intensity of reflectors lying within the ideal target region defined by one of the circles 112. Thus, each bar 115A-115E may correspond to each circle 110A-110E, which correspond to known positions of the reflectors (e.g., pins 66). A higher bar level may indicate better alignment of the actual image with the theoretical image for a given reflector position 110.


In the example of FIG. 11A, the center pin image 110C appears to be well-aligned while the images of the pins on the left 110A, 110B appear too high, and the image of the pins on the right 110D, 110E appear too low. This pattern may indicate that the array is misaligned in rotation about the elevation axis 104 (i.e., the left side of the array is too close to the target, and the right side of the array is too far away from the target), In view of this misalignment, the array 62 may be adjusted by tightening the right-side set screws 74B, 74C.


Misalignment due to rotation about the longitudinal axis 102 may be detected by recognizing that the images of all of the pins 110A-110C (or at least the center pin image 110C) is not as bright as expected. Such misalignment may be corrected by adjusting either the front screws 74D, 74C in the PAE or the rear PAE screws 74A, 74B depending on the suspected direction of misalignment about the longitudinal axis. In some cases, similar adjustments may be made my adjusting screws 63A-63C in the adjustment cover 61.


Misalignment about the vertical axis 106 may result in the images of pins further from the center being progressively less bright than the center pin image 110C. Such misalignment about the vertical axis may be corrected by tightening one or more of the adjustment screws 63A or 63C in the front plate 61 of the adjustment assembly 54.


In some embodiments, an assessment of the alignment of an array under test may be made based primarily on the imaged position of the center pin 110C and a single pair of pins equidistant from the center pin 110C. For example, the degree and direction of any misalignment of the array may be determined by evaluating the imaged position of only the center pin 110C and the two next-closest pins 110B and 110D relative to the expected positions of those pins.



FIG. 11 B illustrates an example of an image that may be produced by an array that is substantially perfectly aligned with the target 56 and the PAE 60. In some embodiments, the degree of variation from the ideal image that may be allowable within a designed tolerance may be determined by experimentation.


In some embodiments, the step 26 (in the process of FIG. 2) of testing the alignment of an array 62 relative to a PAE 60 may be performed using a tank assembly such as that shown and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/760,327. In that system, the alignment of an array supported at an upper part of a tank may be tested by transmitting an ultrasound signal from the array and receiving echoes using a separate set of hydrophones located at the bottom of the tank.


With reference to FIGS. 6 and 9, once the array is found to be sufficiently aligned, the array 62 may be fixed in the new position relative to the PAE 60 by injecting a low viscosity flowable solidifying material through the injection holes 94 in the PAE. The solidifying material used in this step may have a sufficiently low viscosity to allow easy injection and filling of the space between the PAE and the array without altering the array's alignment relative to the PAE. The solidifying material may then be allowed to cure. In some embodiments, a quantity of flowable solidifying material may be injected into one hole 94 until the liquid solidifying material is seen extruding from the second hole 94. In other embodiments, a measured quantity of the flowable solidifying material approximately equal to the volume of the space between the PAE 60 and the back surface 80 of the array 62. Excess solidifying material may be allowed to extrude from the second hole. Once the solidifying material has cured, the array 62 will be secured to the PAE 60 in the aligned orientation, thus forming an aligned array-PAE assembly. At this point, the set screws may be removed or backed out from the adjusted positions, and the aligned array-PAE assembly may be removed from the adjustment and alignment assembly 54. If needed, the process may be restarted for a new array.


In various embodiments, some or all of the process of testing and adjusting alignment of a transducer array may be automated. For example, software may be provided and configured for evaluating misalignment of an array and selecting a suitable corrective adjustment as described above. Furthermore, robotic elements may be provided and configured to adjust the various set screws in order to automatically apply a corrective adjustment selected by a software agent. A robotic element may also be provided for injecting a quantity of a flowable solidifying material into the space between the PAE and the array.


Probe Assembly Method Embodiments


Once a sufficient number of arrays have been aligned to their respective PAEs, the aligned arrays may be mounted to a probe alignment bracket 120 such as that shown in FIG. 12 before final assembly into a probe housing 14 (FIG. 13). In some embodiments, a probe alignment bracket 120 may be provided with a plurality of array-receiving sections 122A-122C. Each array-receiving section 122A-122C may include structural features for receiving a PAE 60 attached to an aligned array 62. In some embodiments, the receiving sections 122A-122C may include ribs configured to engage channels 92 in the PAE 60 (FIG. 6). The receiving sections 122A-122C may also include a plurality of screw holes 124 through which mounting screws may pass for attaching PAEs 60 to the probe alignment bracket 120. The alignment bracket 120 may also include flanges 126 and/or other features to assist in positioning the PAEs in the proper positions. In other embodiments, a probe alignment bracket may have a wide range of shapes and configurations beyond that illustrated here depending on the number and designed orientation of arrays to be included in a probe.


In some embodiments, the probe alignment bracket 120 may also include attachment flanges 128 for securing an electronic connection board (not shown). An electronic connection board may be configured with a plurality of connectors configured for electrical connection to the flex connectors extending from each transducer array. In some embodiments, the connector board may further include traces connecting the transducer array connections to a common connector that may be configured for connection to a cable. Details of some embodiments of such connector boards and cabling assemblies may be seen in Applicants' U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/272,098 titled “Multiple Aperture Probe Internal Apparatus and Cable Assemblies,” which is incorporated herein by reference.


The probe internal assembly including the probe alignment bracket 120, connector board and aligned array-PAE assemblies may then be inserted into a probe housing 14 as shown in FIG. 13. In various embodiments, a probe housing 14may include a one-piece construction, a clamshell construction, or any other suitable configuration. In some embodiments, portions of the internal assembly may be attached to portions of the probe housing by screws, bolts, clamps, clips, pins, or any other suitable attachment device.


Once the internal assembly is fully inserted into a probe housing 14, the aligned arrays 12A-12C and the probe alignment bracket 120 to which they are mounted may be permanently potted by injecting a flowable solidifying material 130 such as RTV silicone into the shell housing, surrounding at least portions of the arrays 12A-12C. In some embodiments, a flowable solidifying material 130 may also be injected further into the probe housing 14 so as to surround all or portions of the probe alignment bracket 12. In some embodiments, the flowable solidifying material may be used to substantially fill the space between the arrays and the sides of the probe housing 14. The solidifying material may also be smoothed out so as to provide a substantially consistent surface with the front surfaces of the arrays 12A-12C.


Embodiments of Completed Probe Assemblies


In various embodiments, a final probe assembled using the systems and methods described above may have some unique characteristics, some of which are illustrated in FIG. 13. As shown in the cross-sectional view of FIG. 13, a completed probe may include a plurality of transducer arrays 12A-12C potted into the probe housing 14 by a quantity of a solidified potting material 130 (e.g., RTV silicone or any other solidified flowable solidifying material). Each transducer array 12A-12C may be seen to be secured to a precision alignment element 60A-60C by an additional layer of a solidified material 132 between the precision alignment element 60 and the transducer array 12 (62). The layer of solidified material 132 may include the gasket (76 in FIGS. 6 and 7) and the affixing layer of solidifying material injected after aligning the array to the PAE. The precision alignment elements 60A-60C are, in turn, mounted to a probe alignment bracket 120 in precise positions.


Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. Various modifications to the above embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.


In particular, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. Furthermore, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, unless explicitly stated otherwise, the term “or” is inclusive of all presented alternatives, and means essentially the same as the commonly used phrase “and/or.” It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.

Claims
  • 1. A method of building a multiple aperture ultrasound probe, the method comprising the steps of: forming a gasket with a first flowable solidifying material on a lower surface of a substantially planar precision alignment element;securing the precision alignment element to a back surface of a transducer array with the gasket, the gasket having an enclosed perimeter shape and a thickness dimension extending away from the substantially planar precision alignment element;evaluating and adjusting alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element; andinjecting a second flowable solidifying material through at least one hole in the precision alignment element to secure the transducer array to the precision alignment element.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the injecting step comprises filling a volume defined by the back surface of the transducer array, the lower surface of the precision alignment element, and an inner circumferential surface of the gasket with the second flowable solidifying material.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising allowing the second flowable solidifying material to solidify, and mounting the precision alignment element to a probe alignment bracket.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, further comprising placing the probe alignment bracket into a probe housing, and injecting a third flowable solidifying material into a space between the transducer array and the probe housing.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the injected third flowable solidifying material surrounds at least a portion of the precision alignment element or the probe alignment bracket.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein evaluating alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element comprises imaging a target with the transducer array and comparing a resulting image of the target with known information defining a geometry of the target.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the target comprises a plurality of pins oriented in a known configuration relative to the precision alignment element.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein each of the pins has a flat surface substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the pins, the longitudinal axis being substantially perpendicular to an ultrasound wavefront transmitted from a single element of the transducer array and arriving at the pins.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element comprises adjusting at least one set screw to mechanically move the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising allowing the first flowable solidifying material to solidify prior to evaluating and adjusting alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the first flowable solidifying material and the second flowable solidifying material are the same material.
  • 12. A method of evaluating an alignment of an ultrasound transducer array relative to a precision alignment element, the method comprising the steps of; flexibly securing the ultrasound transducer array to the precision alignment element;mounting the precision alignment element in a fixed, known position and orientation relative to a target, the target having a plurality of reflectors in known reflector positions;imaging the reflectors of the target with the array;comparing imaged reflector positions with known reflector positions; andidentifying a corrective adjustment based on the comparing step.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising comparing a brightness of the reflectors with expected brightness values.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, further comprising visually comparing imaged reflector positions with known reflector positions using a graphical user interface in which a first image comprising the imaged reflector positions is displayed simultaneously with a second image comprising the known reflector positions.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the graphical user interface further comprises a graphical representation of a brightness of imaged reflectors within a pre-determined radius of the known reflector positions.
  • 16. An ultrasound probe alignment system, comprising: a tank assembly comprising an ultrasound conducting material;an array affixing and adjusting assembly at least partially within the tank assembly, the array affixing and adjusting assembly supporting a precision alignment element in a known position and orientation relative to a target assembly, the target assembly being disposed in the tank assembly and comprising a plurality of pins oriented with longitudinal axes that intersect at a single point.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, further comprising a height adjustment assembly configured to adjust a distance between the array affixing and adjusting assembly and the target assembly.
  • 18. The system of claim 16, wherein the plurality of pins are arranged with their longitudinal axes lying in a precisely aligned imaging plane of the ultrasound probe alignment system.
  • 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the pins are arranged so as to be displaced from one another in two dimensions in the imaging plane of the ultrasound probe alignment system.
  • 20. The system of claim 18, wherein the pins vary in length so as to lie on multiple different points of the imaging plane of the ultrasound probe alignment system.
  • 21. The system of claim 20, wherein the plurality of pins comprises a center pin and at least one pair of pins equidistant from the center pin.
  • 22. The system of claim 16, wherein the array affixing and adjusting assembly comprises structures for adjusting an orientation of an ultrasound transducer array relative to the precision alignment element.
  • 23. A method of building a multiple aperture ultrasound probe, the method comprising the steps of: forming a gasket with a first flowable solidifying material on a lower surface of a precision alignment element;securing the precision alignment element to a back surface of a transducer array with the gasket;evaluating and adjusting alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element by imaging a target with the transducer array and comparing a resulting image of the target with known information defining a geometry of the target, the target comprising a plurality of pins oriented with longitudinal axes that intersect at a single point and in a known configuration relative to the precision alignment element; andinjecting a second flowable solidifying material through at least one hole in the precision alignment element to secure the transducer array to the precision alignment element.
  • 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the injecting step comprises filling a volume defined by the back surface of the transducer array, the lower surface of the precision alignment element, and an inner perimeter surface of the gasket with the second flowable solidifying material.
  • 25. The method of claim 23, further comprising allowing the second flowable solidifying material to solidify, and mounting the precision alignment element to a probe alignment bracket.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, further comprising placing the probe alignment bracket into a probe housing, and injecting a third flowable solidifying material into a space between the transducer array and the probe housing.
  • 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the injected third flowable solidifying material surrounds at least a portion of the precision alignment element or the probe alignment bracket.
  • 28. The method of claim 23, wherein each of the pins has a flat surface substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the pins, the longitudinal axis being substantially perpendicular to an ultrasound wavefront transmitted from a single element of the transducer array and arriving at the pins.
  • 29. The method of claim 23, wherein adjusting alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element comprises adjusting at least one set screw to mechanically move the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element.
  • 30. The method of claim 23, further comprising allowing the first flowable solidifying material to solidifyrior to evaluating and adjusting alignment of the transducer array relative to the precision alignment element.
  • 31. The method of claim 23, wherein the first flowable solidifying material and the second flowable solidifying material are the same material.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/780,366, filed Mar. 13, 2013, titled “Alignment of Ultrasound Transducer Arrays and Multiple Aperture Probe Assembly”, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (472)
Number Name Date Kind
3174286 Erickson Mar 1965 A
3895381 Kock Jul 1975 A
4055988 Dutton Nov 1977 A
4072922 Taner et al. Feb 1978 A
4097835 Green Jun 1978 A
4105018 Greenleaf et al. Aug 1978 A
4259733 Taner et al. Mar 1981 A
4271842 Specht et al. Jun 1981 A
4325257 Kino et al. Apr 1982 A
4327738 Green et al. May 1982 A
4333474 Nigam Jun 1982 A
4339952 Foster Jul 1982 A
4452084 Taenzer Jun 1984 A
4501279 Seo Feb 1985 A
4539847 Paap Sep 1985 A
4566459 Umemura et al. Jan 1986 A
4567768 Satoh et al. Feb 1986 A
4604697 Luthra et al. Aug 1986 A
4662222 Johnson May 1987 A
4669482 Ophir Jun 1987 A
4682497 Sasaki Jul 1987 A
4781199 Hirama et al. Nov 1988 A
4817434 Anderson Apr 1989 A
4831601 Breimesser et al. May 1989 A
4893284 Magrane Jan 1990 A
4893628 Angelsen Jan 1990 A
5050588 Grey et al. Sep 1991 A
5141738 Rasor et al. Aug 1992 A
5161536 Vilkomerson et al. Nov 1992 A
5197475 Antich et al. Mar 1993 A
5226019 Bahorich Jul 1993 A
5230339 Charlebois Jul 1993 A
5269309 Fort et al. Dec 1993 A
5278757 Hoctor et al. Jan 1994 A
5293871 Reinstein et al. Mar 1994 A
5299576 Shiba Apr 1994 A
5301674 Erikson et al. Apr 1994 A
5305756 Entrekin et al. Apr 1994 A
5339282 Kuhn et al. Aug 1994 A
5340510 Bowen Aug 1994 A
5345426 Lipschutz Sep 1994 A
5349960 Gondo Sep 1994 A
5355888 Kendall Oct 1994 A
5398216 Hall et al. Mar 1995 A
5409010 Beach et al. Apr 1995 A
5442462 Guissin Aug 1995 A
5503152 Oakley et al. Apr 1996 A
5515853 Smith et al. May 1996 A
5515856 Olstad et al. May 1996 A
5522393 Phillips et al. Jun 1996 A
5526815 Granz et al. Jun 1996 A
5544659 Banjanin Aug 1996 A
5558092 Unger et al. Sep 1996 A
5564423 Mele et al. Oct 1996 A
5568812 Murashita et al. Oct 1996 A
5570691 Wright et al. Nov 1996 A
5581517 Gee et al. Dec 1996 A
5625149 Gururaja et al. Apr 1997 A
5628320 Teo May 1997 A
5673697 Bryan et al. Oct 1997 A
5675550 Ekhaus Oct 1997 A
5720291 Schwartz Feb 1998 A
5720708 Lu et al. Feb 1998 A
5744898 Smith et al. Apr 1998 A
5769079 Hossack Jun 1998 A
5784334 Sena et al. Jul 1998 A
5785654 Iinuma et al. Jul 1998 A
5795297 Daigle Aug 1998 A
5797845 Barabash et al. Aug 1998 A
5798459 Ohba et al. Aug 1998 A
5820561 Olstad et al. Oct 1998 A
5838564 Bahorich et al. Nov 1998 A
5850622 Vassiliou et al. Dec 1998 A
5862100 VerWest Jan 1999 A
5870691 Partyka et al. Feb 1999 A
5876342 Chen et al. Mar 1999 A
5891038 Seyed-Bolorforosh et al. Apr 1999 A
5892732 Gersztenkorn Apr 1999 A
5916169 Hanafy et al. Jun 1999 A
5919139 Lin Jul 1999 A
5920285 Benjamin Jul 1999 A
5930730 Marfurt et al. Jul 1999 A
5940778 Marfurt et al. Aug 1999 A
5951479 Holm et al. Sep 1999 A
5964707 Fenster et al. Oct 1999 A
5969661 Benjamin Oct 1999 A
5999836 Nelson et al. Dec 1999 A
6007499 Martin et al. Dec 1999 A
6013032 Savord Jan 2000 A
6014473 Hossack et al. Jan 2000 A
6048315 Chiao et al. Apr 2000 A
6049509 Sonneland et al. Apr 2000 A
6050943 Slayton et al. Apr 2000 A
6056693 Haider May 2000 A
6058074 Swan et al. May 2000 A
6077224 Lang et al. Jun 2000 A
6092026 Bahorich et al. Jul 2000 A
6122538 Sliwa, Jr. et al. Sep 2000 A
6123670 Mo Sep 2000 A
6129672 Seward et al. Oct 2000 A
6135960 Holmberg Oct 2000 A
6138075 Yost Oct 2000 A
6148095 Prause et al. Nov 2000 A
6162175 Marian, Jr. et al. Dec 2000 A
6166384 Dentinger et al. Dec 2000 A
6166853 Sapia et al. Dec 2000 A
6193665 Hall et al. Feb 2001 B1
6196739 Silverbrook Mar 2001 B1
6200266 Shokrollahi et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210335 Miller Apr 2001 B1
6213958 Winder Apr 2001 B1
6221019 Kantorovich Apr 2001 B1
6231511 Bae May 2001 B1
6238342 Feleppa et al. May 2001 B1
6246901 Benaron Jun 2001 B1
6251073 Imran et al. Jun 2001 B1
6264609 Herrington et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266551 Osadchy et al. Jul 2001 B1
6278949 Alam Aug 2001 B1
6289230 Chaiken et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304684 Niczyporuk et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309356 Ustuner et al. Oct 2001 B1
6324453 Breed et al. Nov 2001 B1
6345539 Rawes et al. Feb 2002 B1
6361500 Masters Mar 2002 B1
6363033 Cole et al. Mar 2002 B1
6370480 Gupta Apr 2002 B1
6374185 Taner et al. Apr 2002 B1
6394955 Perlitz May 2002 B1
6423002 Hossack Jul 2002 B1
6436046 Napolitano et al. Aug 2002 B1
6449821 Sudol et al. Sep 2002 B1
6450965 Williams et al. Sep 2002 B2
6468216 Powers et al. Oct 2002 B1
6471650 Powers et al. Oct 2002 B2
6475150 Haddad Nov 2002 B2
6480790 Calvert et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487502 Taner Nov 2002 B1
6499536 Ellingsen Dec 2002 B1
6508768 Hall et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508770 Cai Jan 2003 B1
6517484 Wilk et al. Feb 2003 B1
6526163 Halmann et al. Feb 2003 B1
6543272 Vitek Apr 2003 B1
6547732 Jago Apr 2003 B2
6551246 Ustuner et al. Apr 2003 B1
6565510 Haider May 2003 B1
6585647 Winder Jul 2003 B1
6604421 Li Aug 2003 B1
6614560 Silverbrook Sep 2003 B1
6620101 Azzam et al. Sep 2003 B2
6652461 Levkovitz Nov 2003 B1
6668654 Dubois et al. Dec 2003 B2
6672165 Rather et al. Jan 2004 B2
6681185 Young et al. Jan 2004 B1
6690816 Aylward et al. Feb 2004 B2
6692450 Coleman Feb 2004 B1
6695778 Golland et al. Feb 2004 B2
6702745 Smythe Mar 2004 B1
6719693 Richard Apr 2004 B2
6728567 Rather et al. Apr 2004 B2
6752762 DeJong et al. Jun 2004 B1
6755787 Hossack et al. Jun 2004 B2
6780152 Ustuner et al. Aug 2004 B2
6790182 Eck et al. Sep 2004 B2
6837853 Marian Jan 2005 B2
6843770 Sumanaweera Jan 2005 B2
6847737 Kouri et al. Jan 2005 B1
6854332 Alleyne Feb 2005 B2
6932767 Landry et al. Aug 2005 B2
7033320 Von Behren et al. Apr 2006 B2
7087023 Daft et al. Aug 2006 B2
7104956 Christopher Sep 2006 B1
7217243 Takeuchi May 2007 B2
7221867 Silverbrook May 2007 B2
7231072 Yamano et al. Jun 2007 B2
7269299 Schroeder Sep 2007 B2
7283652 Mendonca et al. Oct 2007 B2
7285094 Nohara et al. Oct 2007 B2
7313053 Wodnicki Dec 2007 B2
7366704 Reading et al. Apr 2008 B2
7402136 Hossack et al. Jul 2008 B2
7410469 Talish et al. Aug 2008 B1
7415880 Renzel Aug 2008 B2
7443765 Thomenius et al. Oct 2008 B2
7444875 Wu et al. Nov 2008 B1
7447535 Lavi Nov 2008 B2
7448998 Robinson Nov 2008 B2
7466848 Metaxas et al. Dec 2008 B2
7469096 Silverbrook Dec 2008 B2
7474778 Shinomura et al. Jan 2009 B2
7481577 Ramamurthy et al. Jan 2009 B2
7491171 Barthe et al. Feb 2009 B2
7497828 Wilk et al. Mar 2009 B1
7497830 Li Mar 2009 B2
7510529 Chou et al. Mar 2009 B2
7514851 Wilser et al. Apr 2009 B2
7549962 Dreschel et al. Jun 2009 B2
7574026 Rasche et al. Aug 2009 B2
7625343 Cao et al. Dec 2009 B2
7637869 Sudol Dec 2009 B2
7668583 Fegert et al. Feb 2010 B2
7674228 Williams et al. Mar 2010 B2
7682311 Simopoulos et al. Mar 2010 B2
7699776 Walker et al. Apr 2010 B2
7722541 Cai May 2010 B2
7744532 Ustuner et al. Jun 2010 B2
7750311 Daghighian Jul 2010 B2
7785260 Umemura et al. Aug 2010 B2
7787680 Ahn et al. Aug 2010 B2
7806828 Stringer Oct 2010 B2
7819810 Stringer et al. Oct 2010 B2
7822250 Yao et al. Oct 2010 B2
7824337 Abe et al. Nov 2010 B2
7833163 Cai Nov 2010 B2
7837624 Hossack et al. Nov 2010 B1
7846097 Jones et al. Dec 2010 B2
7850613 Stribling Dec 2010 B2
7862508 Davies et al. Jan 2011 B2
7876945 Lötjönen Jan 2011 B2
7887486 Ustuner et al. Feb 2011 B2
7901358 Mehi et al. Mar 2011 B2
7914451 Davies Mar 2011 B2
7919906 Cerofolini Apr 2011 B2
7926350 Kröning et al. Apr 2011 B2
7927280 Davidsen Apr 2011 B2
7972271 Johnson et al. Jul 2011 B2
7984637 Ao et al. Jul 2011 B2
7984651 Randall et al. Jul 2011 B2
8002705 Napolitano et al. Aug 2011 B1
8007439 Specht Aug 2011 B2
8057392 Hossack et al. Nov 2011 B2
8057393 Yao et al. Nov 2011 B2
8079263 Randall et al. Dec 2011 B2
8079956 Azuma et al. Dec 2011 B2
8088067 Vortman et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088068 Yao et al. Jan 2012 B2
8088071 Hwang et al. Jan 2012 B2
8105239 Specht Jan 2012 B2
8135190 Bae et al. Mar 2012 B2
8157737 Zhang et al. Apr 2012 B2
8182427 Wu et al. May 2012 B2
8202219 Luo et al. Jun 2012 B2
8277383 Specht Oct 2012 B2
8279705 Choi et al. Oct 2012 B2
8412307 Willis et al. Apr 2013 B2
8419642 Sandrin et al. Apr 2013 B2
8473239 Specht et al. Jun 2013 B2
8478382 Burnside et al. Jul 2013 B2
8532951 Roy et al. Sep 2013 B2
8582848 Funka-Lea et al. Nov 2013 B2
8602993 Specht et al. Dec 2013 B2
8627724 Papadopoulos et al. Jan 2014 B2
8634615 Brabec Jan 2014 B2
8672846 Napolitano et al. Mar 2014 B2
8684936 Specht Apr 2014 B2
20020035864 Paltieli et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020087071 Schmitz et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020111568 Bukshpan Aug 2002 A1
20020161299 Prater et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030028111 Vaezy et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040669 Grass et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030228053 Li et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040054283 Corey et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040068184 Trahey et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040100163 Baumgartner et al. May 2004 A1
20040111028 Abe et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122313 Moore et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122322 Moore et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127793 Mendlein et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138565 Trucco Jul 2004 A1
20040144176 Yoden Jul 2004 A1
20040236217 Cerwin et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040236223 Barnes et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050004449 Mitschke et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050053305 Li et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050054910 Tremblay et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050090743 Kawashima et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050090745 Steen Apr 2005 A1
20050111846 Steinbacher et al. May 2005 A1
20050113689 Gritzky May 2005 A1
20050113694 Haugen et al. May 2005 A1
20050124883 Hunt Jun 2005 A1
20050131300 Bakircioglu et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050147297 McLaughlin et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165312 Knowles et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050203404 Freiburger Sep 2005 A1
20050215883 Hundley et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050240125 Makin et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050252295 Fink et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050281447 Moreau-Gobard et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288588 Weber et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060062447 Rinck et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074313 Slayton et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060074315 Liang et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060074320 Yoo et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079759 Vaillant et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079778 Mo et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079782 Beach et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060094962 Clark May 2006 A1
20060111634 Wu May 2006 A1
20060122506 Davies et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060173327 Kim Aug 2006 A1
20060262291 Hess et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060262961 Holsing et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070016022 Blalock et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016044 Blalock et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070036414 Georgescu et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070055155 Owen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078345 Mo et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088213 Poland Apr 2007 A1
20070138157 Dane et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070161898 Hao et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070161904 Urbano Jul 2007 A1
20070167752 Proulx et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167824 Lee et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070232914 Chen et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070238985 Smith et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070242567 Daft et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080110261 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080110263 Klessel et al. May 2008 A1
20080112265 Urbano et al. May 2008 A1
20080114241 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080114245 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080114246 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080114247 Urbano et al. May 2008 A1
20080114248 Urbano et al. May 2008 A1
20080114249 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080114250 Urbano et al. May 2008 A1
20080114251 Weymer et al. May 2008 A1
20080114252 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080114253 Randall et al. May 2008 A1
20080114255 Schwartz et al. May 2008 A1
20080125659 Wilser et al. May 2008 A1
20080181479 Yang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183075 Govari et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080188747 Randall et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080188750 Randall et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080194957 Hoctor et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080194958 Lee et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080194959 Wang et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080208061 Halmann Aug 2008 A1
20080242996 Hall et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080249408 Palmeri et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080255452 Entrekin Oct 2008 A1
20080269604 Boctor et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269613 Summers et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080275344 Glide-Hurst et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080285819 Konofagou et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080287787 Sauer et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294045 Ellington et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294050 Shinomura et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294052 Wilser et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080306382 Guracar et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080306386 Baba et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080319317 Kamiyama et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090010459 Garbini et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090012393 Choi Jan 2009 A1
20090016163 Freeman et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090018445 Schers et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024039 Wang et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036780 Abraham Feb 2009 A1
20090043206 Towfiq et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090048519 Hossack et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090069681 Lundberg et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090069686 Daft et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090069692 Cooley et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090099483 Rybyanets Apr 2009 A1
20090112095 Daigle Apr 2009 A1
20090131797 Jeong et al. May 2009 A1
20090143680 Yao et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090148012 Altmann et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150094 Van Velsor et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090182237 Angelsen et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198134 Hashimoto et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090203997 Ustuner Aug 2009 A1
20090208080 Grau et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090259128 Stribling Oct 2009 A1
20090264760 Lazebnik et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090306510 Hashiba et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326379 Daigle et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100010354 Skerl et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100016725 Thiele Jan 2010 A1
20100063397 Wagner Mar 2010 A1
20100063399 Walker et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069751 Hazard et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100069756 Ogasawara et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100106431 Baba et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100109481 Buccafusca May 2010 A1
20100121193 Fukukita et al. May 2010 A1
20100121196 Hwang et al. May 2010 A1
20100130855 Lundberg et al. May 2010 A1
20100168566 Bercoff et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100168578 Garson, Jr. et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100174194 Chiang et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100217124 Cooley Aug 2010 A1
20100240994 Zheng Sep 2010 A1
20100249570 Carson et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249596 Magee Sep 2010 A1
20100256488 Kim et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100262013 Smith et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100266176 Masumoto et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100268503 Specht Oct 2010 A1
20100286525 Osumi Nov 2010 A1
20100286527 Cannon et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100310143 Rao et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100324418 El-Aklouk et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100324423 El-Aklouk et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100329521 Beymer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110005322 Ustuner Jan 2011 A1
20110016977 Guracar Jan 2011 A1
20110021920 Shafir et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110021923 Daft et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110033098 Richter et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110044133 Tokita Feb 2011 A1
20110066030 Yao Mar 2011 A1
20110098565 Masuzawa Apr 2011 A1
20110112400 Emery et al. May 2011 A1
20110112404 Gourevitch May 2011 A1
20110125017 Ramamurthy et al. May 2011 A1
20110201933 Specht et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110270088 Shiina Nov 2011 A1
20110301470 Sato et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110306886 Daft et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110319764 Okada et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120004545 Ziv-Ari et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120035482 Kim et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120036934 Kröning et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120057428 Specht et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120085173 Papadopoulos et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120095343 Smith et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120095347 Adam et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120101378 Lee Apr 2012 A1
20120114210 Kim et al. May 2012 A1
20120116226 Specht May 2012 A1
20120121150 Murashita May 2012 A1
20120137778 Kitazawa et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120141002 Urbano et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120165670 Shi et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120179044 Chiang et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120226201 Clark et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120235998 Smith-Casem et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120243763 Wen et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120253194 Tamura Oct 2012 A1
20120265075 Pedrizzetti et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120277585 Koenig et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130070062 Fouras et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130076207 Krohn et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130079639 Hoctor et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130083628 Qiao et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130088122 Krohn et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130116561 Rothberg et al. May 2013 A1
20130131516 Katsuyama May 2013 A1
20130144165 Ebbini et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130144166 Specht et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130172743 Brewer et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130204136 Duric et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130204137 Roy et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130218012 Specht et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130247350 Specht et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253325 Call et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130258805 Hansen et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130261463 Chiang et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140043933 Belevich et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058266 Call et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140073921 Specht et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140086014 Kobayashi Mar 2014 A1
20140243673 Anand et al. Aug 2014 A1
20150297184 Specht Oct 2015 A1
20160095579 Smith et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160135783 Brewer et al. May 2016 A1
20160157833 Smith et al. Jun 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (95)
Number Date Country
1781460 Jun 2006 CN
101190134 Jun 2008 CN
101843501 Sep 2010 CN
102018533 Apr 2011 CN
102123668 Jul 2011 CN
1949856 Jul 2008 EP
2058796 May 2009 EP
2101191 Sep 2009 EP
2182352 May 2010 EP
2187813 May 2010 EP
2198785 Jun 2010 EP
1757955 Nov 2010 EP
2325672 May 2011 EP
1462819 Jul 2011 EP
2356941 Aug 2011 EP
1979739 Oct 2011 EP
2385391 Nov 2011 EP
2294400 Feb 2012 EP
2453256 May 2012 EP
1840594 Jun 2012 EP
2514368 Oct 2012 EP
1850743 Dec 2012 EP
1594404 Sep 2013 EP
2026280 Oct 2013 EP
2851662 Aug 2004 FR
S49-11189 Jan 1974 JP
S54-44375 Apr 1979 JP
S55-103839 Aug 1980 JP
57-31848 Feb 1982 JP
59-101143 Jun 1984 JP
S59-174151 Oct 1984 JP
S60-13109 Jan 1985 JP
S60-68836 Apr 1985 JP
2-501431 May 1990 JP
4-67856 Mar 1992 JP
05-042138 Feb 1993 JP
6-125908 May 1994 JP
7-051266 Feb 1995 JP
08-252253 Oct 1996 JP
9-103429 Apr 1997 JP
9-201361 Aug 1997 JP
10-216128 Aug 1998 JP
11-089833 Apr 1999 JP
11-239578 Sep 1999 JP
2001-507794 Jun 2001 JP
2001-245884 Sep 2001 JP
2002-209894 Jul 2002 JP
2002-253548 Sep 2002 JP
2002-253549 Sep 2002 JP
2004-167092 Jun 2004 JP
2004-215987 Aug 2004 JP
2004-337457 Dec 2004 JP
2004-351214 Dec 2004 JP
2005152187 Jun 2005 JP
2005-523792 Aug 2005 JP
2005-526539 Sep 2005 JP
2006-61203 Mar 2006 JP
2006-122657 May 2006 JP
2007-325937 Dec 2007 JP
2008-122209 May 2008 JP
2008-513763 May 2008 JP
2008-259541 Oct 2008 JP
20105375 Jan 2010 JP
100715132 Apr 2007 KR
1020090103408 Oct 2009 KR
WO 9218054 Oct 1992 WO
WO 9800719 Jan 1998 WO
WO0164109 Sep 2001 WO
WO02084594 Oct 2002 WO
WO2005009245 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2006114735 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2007127147 Nov 2007 WO
WO2009060182 May 2009 WO
WO 2010017445 Feb 2010 WO
WO 2010095094 Aug 2010 WO
WO2011057252 May 2011 WO
WO2011064688 Jun 2011 WO
WO2011100697 Aug 2011 WO
WO2011123529 Oct 2011 WO
WO2012028896 Mar 2012 WO
WO2012049124 Apr 2012 WO
WO2012049612 Apr 2012 WO
WO2012078639 Jun 2012 WO
WO2012091280 Jul 2012 WO
WO2012112540 Aug 2012 WO
WO2012131340 Oct 2012 WO
WO2012160541 Nov 2012 WO
WO2013059358 Apr 2013 WO
WO2013109965 Jul 2013 WO
WO2013116807 Aug 2013 WO
WO2013116809 Aug 2013 WO
WO2013116851 Aug 2013 WO
WO2013116854 Aug 2013 WO
WO2013116866 Aug 2013 WO
WO2013128301 Sep 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (52)
Entry
Li et al.; An efficient speckle tracking algorithm for ultrasonic imaging; 24; pp. 215-228; Oct. 1, 2002.
UCLA Academic Technology; SPSS learning module: How can I analyze a subset of my data; 6 pages; retrieved from the Internet (http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/spss/modules/subset—analyze.htm) Nov. 26, 2001.
Wikipedia; Curve fitting; 5 pages; retrieved from the internet (http:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve—fitting) Dec. 19, 2010.
Wikipedia; Speed of sound; 17 pages; retrieved from the internet (http:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed—of—sound) Feb. 15, 2011.
Hendee et al.; Medical Imaging Physics; Wiley-Liss, Inc. 4th Edition; Chap. 19-22; pp. 303-353; © 2002 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date).
Wikipedia; Point cloud; 2 pages; retrieved Nov. 24, 2014 from the internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Point—cloud&oldid=472583138).
Smith et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,186 entitled “Universal multiple aperture medical ultrasound probe,” filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Smith et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/595,083 entitled “Concave ultrasound transducers and 3D arrays,” filed Jan. 12, 2015.
Cristianini et al.; An Introduction to Support Vector Machines; Cambridge University Press; pp. 93-111; Mar. 2000.
Du et al.; User parameter free approaches to multistatic adaptive ultrasound imaging; 5th IEEE International Symposium; pp. 1287-1290, May 2008.
Feigenbaum, Harvey, M.D.; Echocardiography; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia; 5th Ed.; pp. 428, 484; Feb. 1994.
Haykin, Simon; Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation (2nd Ed.); Prentice Hall; pp. 156-187; Jul. 16, 1998.
Kramb et al,.; Considerations for using phased array ultrasonics in a fully automated inspection system. Review of Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 23, ed. D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, pp. 817-825, (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 2004.
Ledesma-Carbayo et al.; Spatio-temporal nonrigid registration for ultrasound cardiac motion estimation; IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging; vol. 24; No. 9; Sep. 2005.
Leotta et al.; Quantitative three-dimensional echocardiography by rapid imaging . . . ; J American Society of Echocardiography; vol. 10; No. 8; ppl 830-839; Oct. 1997.
Morrison et al.; A probabilistic neural network based image segmentation network for magnetic resonance images; Proc. Conf. Neural Networks; Baltimore, MD; vol. 3; pp. 60-65; Jun. 1992.
Nadkarni et al.; Cardiac motion synchronization for 3D cardiac ultrasound imaging; Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Western Ontario; Jun. 2002.
Press et al.; Cubic spline interpolation; §3.3 in “Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing”, 2nd Ed.; Cambridge, England; Cambridge University Press; pp. 107-110; Sep. 1992.
Sakas et al.; Preprocessing and volume rendering of 3D ultrasonic data; IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications; pp. 47-54, Jul. 1995.
Sapia et al.; Deconvolution of ultrasonic waveforms using an adaptive wiener filter; Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation; vol. 13A; Plenum Press; pp. 855-862; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date) 1994.
Sapia et al.; Ultrasound image deconvolution using adaptive inverse filtering; 12 IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, CBMS, pp. 248-253; Jun. 1999.
Sapia, Mark Angelo; Multi-dimensional deconvolution of optical microscope and ultrasound imaging using adaptive least-mean-square (LMS) inverse filtering; Ph.D. Dissertation; University of Connecticut; Jan. 2000.
Smith et al.; High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging system. 1. Transducer design and beam steering; IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr.; vol. 38; pp. 100-108; Mar. 1991.
Specht et al.; Deconvolution techniques for digital longitudinal tomography; SPIE; vol. 454; presented at Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine XII; pp. 319-325; Jun. 1984.
Specht et al.; Experience with adaptive PNN and adaptive GRNN; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. on Neural Networks; vol. 2; pp. 1203-1208; Orlando, FL; Jun. 1994.
Specht, D.F.; A general regression neural network; IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks; vol. 2.; No. 6; Nov. 1991.
Specht, D.F.; Blind deconvolution of motion blur using LMS inverse filtering; Lockheed Independent Research (unpublished); Jun. 23, 1975.
Specht, D.F.; Enhancements to probabilistic neural networks; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. on Neural Networks; Baltimore, MD; Jun. 1992.
Specht, D.F.; GRNN with double clustering; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. Neural Networks; Vancouver, Canada; Jul. 16-21, 2006.
Specht, D.F.; Probabilistic neural networks; Pergamon Press; Neural Networks; vol. 3; pp. 109-118; Feb. 1990.
Von Ramm et al.; High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging-System. 2. Parallel processing and image display; IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr.; vol. 38; pp. 109-115; Mar. 1991.
Wells, P.N.T.; Biomedical ultrasonics; Academic Press; London, New York, San Francisco; pp. 124-125; Mar. 1977.
Widrow et al.; Adaptive signal processing; Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ; pp. 99-116; Mar. 1985.
Specht, D. F.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/157,257 entitled “Method and Apparatus to Produce Ultrasonic Images Using Multiple Apertures,” filed Jan. 16, 2014.
Jeffs; Beamforming: a brief introduction; Brigham Young University; 14 pages; retrieved from the Internet (http://ens.ewi.tudelft.nl/Education/courses/et4235/Beamforming.pdf); Oct. 2004.
Specht et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/279,052 entitled “Ultrasound imaging using apparent point-source transmit transducer,” filed May 15, 2014.
Abeysekera et al.; Alignment and calibration of dual ultrasound transducers using a wedge phantom; Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; 37(2); pp. 271-279; Feb. 2011.
Carson et al.; Measurement of photoacoustic transducer position by robotic source placement and nonlinear parameter estimation; Biomedical Optics (BiOS); International Society for Optics and Photonics (9th Conf. on Biomedical Thermoacoustics, Optoacoustics, and Acousto-optics; vol. 6856; 9 pages; Feb. 28, 2008.
Chen et al.; Maximum-likelihood source localization and unknown sensor location estimation for wideband signals in the near-field; IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing; 50(8); pp. 1843-1854; Aug. 2002.
Chen et al.; Source localization and tracking of a wideband source using a randomly distributed beamforming sensor array; International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications; 16(3); pp. 259-272; Fall 2002.
Fernandez et al.; High resolution ultrasound beamforming using synthetic and adaptive imaging techniques; Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging; Washington, D.C.; pp. 433-436; Jul. 7-10, 2002.
Gazor et al.; Wideband multi-source beamforming with array location calibration and direction finding; Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP-95; Detroit, MI; vol. 3 IEEE; pp. 1904-1907; May 9-12, 1995.
Heikkila et al.; A four-step camera calibration procedure with implicit image correction; Proceedings IEEE Computer Scociety Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; San Juan; pp. 1106-1112; Jun. 17-19, 1997.
Hsu et al.; Real-time freehand 3D ultrasound calibration; CUED/F-INFENG/TR 565; Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; 14 pages; Sep. 2006.
Khamene et al.; A novel phantom-less spatial and temporal ultrasound calibration method; Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI (Proceedings 8th Int. Conf.); Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Palm Springs, CA; pp. 65-72; Oct. 26-29, 2005.
Opretzka et al.; A high-frequency ultrasound imaging system combining limited-angle spatial compounding and model-based synthetic aperture focusing; IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE, US; 58(7); pp. 1355-1365; Jul. 2, 2011.
Slavine et al.; Construction, calibration and evaluation of a tissue phantom with reproducible optical properties for investigations in light emission tomography; Engineering in Medicine and Biology Workshop; Dallas, TX; IEEE pp. 122-125; Nov. 11-12, 2007.
Urban et al; Implementation of vibro-acoustography on a clinical ultrasound system; IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control; 58(6); pp. 1169-1181; Jun. 2011 (Author Manuscript).
Urban et al; Implementation of vibro-acoustography on a clinical ultrasound system; IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS); pp. 326-329; Oct. 14, 2010.
Wang et al.; Photoacoustic tomography of biological tissues with high cross-section resolution: reconstruction and experiment; Medical Physics; 29(12); pp. 2799-2805; Dec. 2002.
Yang et al.; Time-of-arrival calibration for improving the microwave breast cancer imaging; 2011 IEEE Topical Conf. on Biomedical Wireless Technologies, Networks, and sensing Systems (BioWireleSS); Phoenix, AZ; pp. 67-70; Jan. 16-19, 2011.
Specht et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/846,374 entitled “Point source transmission and speed-of-sound correction using multi-aperture ultrasound imaging,” filed Sep. 4, 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140269209 A1 Sep 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61780366 Mar 2013 US