Field
This invention relates generally to data communications, and more specifically, to a service gateway.
Background
Many service gateways such as firewalls and server load balancers provide Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) proxy functionality for some time. Typical uses of TCP proxy include network analysis, security, and traffic adaptation due to asymmetric client and server condition. A TCP proxy server typically allocates a fix amount of memory buffer to handle the data packet buffering of a TCP proxy session between a client device and a server. The memory buffer is used to handle data packet buffers for client side session and server side session. The allocation of memory space among the client side session send and receive buffers, and server side session send and receive buffers does not often take performance into consideration. Common allocation methods include equally dividing the memory buffer among the session send and receive buffers, or a fix weighted average between the send and receive buffers, such as two to one ratio between server side receive buffer and client side send buffer.
Although TCP proxy is known for some time, it has not been used in any significant way. The correlation between the buffer allocation method and the performance of the TCP proxy session is not well understood. Today, many service gateway applications such as HTTP proxy, content filtering applications, advanced server load balancing methods, are deployed widely. Performance of these applications is in part depending on the performance of the TCP proxy session buffer allocation method.
Due to the different and dynamic network characteristics of client devices and servers, a pre-determined allocation of buffer spaces does not perform well on different network conditions. Therefore there is a need to allocate buffer spaces for a TCP proxy session based on one or more dynamic network conditions.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a method for allocating buffers for a TCP proxy session between a client and a server by a service gateway comprising a processor, comprises: monitoring, by the processor, dynamic server side network behaviors for a server side session of the TCP proxy session and dynamic client side network behaviors for a client side session of the TCP proxy session; and allocating, by the processor, capacity for a server side buffer and capacity for a client side buffer in a memory buffer based on the dynamic server side network behaviors, the dynamic client side network behaviors, and a weighted average of a capacity of the memory buffer.
In one aspect of the present invention, the allocating comprises: calculating a maximum capacity for the server side buffer and a maximum capacity for the client side buffer based on the dynamic server side network behaviors, the dynamic client side network behaviors, and the weighted average of the capacity of the memory buffer; and allocating the capacity for the server side buffer and the capacity for the client side buffer based on the maximum capacity for the server side buffer and the maximum capacity for the client side buffer.
In one aspect of the present invention, the allocating comprises: receiving a server side session data from the server, or receiving a client side session data packet from the client; determining whether an available capacity of the server side buffer is sufficient to store the server side session data packet, or determining whether an available capacity of the client side buffer is sufficient to store the client side session data packet; in response to determining that the available capacity of the server side buffer is not sufficient to store the server side session data packet, increasing the allocated capacity of the server side buffer, or in response to determining that the available capacity of the client side buffer is not sufficient to store the client side session data packet, increasing the allocated capacity of the client side buffer; and adjusting the available capacity of the server side buffer according to the increase of the allocated capacity of the server side buffer, or adjusting the available capacity of the client side buffer according to the increase of the allocated capacity of the client side buffer.
In one aspect of the present invention, the increasing comprises: in response to determining that the available capacity of the server side buffer is not sufficient to store the server side session data packet, determining whether the allocated capacity of the server side buffer is smaller than a maximum capacity of the server side buffer, or in response to determining that the available capacity of the client side buffer is not sufficient to store the client side session data packet, determining whether the allocated capacity of the client side buffer is smaller than a maximum capacity of the client side buffer; and in response to determining that the allocated capacity of the server side buffer is smaller than the maximum capacity of the server side buffer, determining whether there is sufficient memory space within the maximum capacity of the server side buffer to store the server side session data packet, or in response to determining that the allocated capacity of the client side buffer is smaller than the maximum capacity of the client side buffer, determining whether there is sufficient memory space within the maximum capacity of the client side buffer to store the client side session data packet; in response to determining that there is sufficient memory space within the maximum capacity of the server side buffer to store the server side session data packet, allocating the memory space to the server side buffer and adjusting the available capacity of the server side buffer according to the allocated memory space, or in response to determining that there is sufficient memory space within the maximum capacity of the client side buffer to store the client side session data packet, allocating the memory space to the client side buffer and adjusting the available capacity of the client side buffer according to the allocated memory space.
In one aspect of the present invention, the monitoring and the calculating comprises: measuring a server side data packet round trip time (RTT) and a client side data packet RTT; and calculating the maximum capacity for the server side buffer and the maximum capacity for the client side buffer using the server side data packet RTT, the client side RTT, and the weighted average of the capacity of the memory buffer.
In one aspect of the present invention, the weighted average of the capacity of the memory buffer is biased toward the server in calculating the maximum capacity for the server side buffer, or wherein the weighted average of the capacity of the memory buffer is biased toward the client in calculating the maximum capacity for the client side buffer.
In one aspect of the present invention, the monitoring further comprises: obtaining new measurements for the server side data packet RTT and the client side data packet RTT; and modifying the maximum capacity for the server side buffer and the maximum capacity for the client side buffer using the new server side data packet RTT, the new client side data packet RTT, and the weighted average of the capacity of the memory buffer.
In one aspect of the present invention, the measuring and the calculating comprises: measuring the server side data packet RTT, the client side data packet RTT, a server side transmission rate, and a client side transmission rate; and calculating the maximum capacity for the server side buffer and the maximum capacity for the client side buffer using the server side data packet RTT, the client side RTT, the server side transmission rate, the client side transmission rate, and the weighted average of the capacity of the memory buffer.
In one aspect of the present invention, the monitoring further comprises: obtaining new measurements for the server side transmission rate and the client side transmission rate; and modifying the maximum capacity for the server side buffer and the maximum capacity for the client side buffer using the server side data packet RTT, the client side data packet RTT, the new server side transmission rate, the new client side transmission rate, and the weighted average of the capacity of the memory buffer.
System and computer program products corresponding to the above-summarized methods are also described and claimed herein.
The present invention can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or an embodiment containing both hardware and software elements. In a preferred embodiment, the present invention is implemented in software, which includes but is not limited to firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.
Furthermore, the present invention can take the form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium providing program code for use by or in connection with a computer or any instruction execution system. For the purposes of this description, a computer-usable or computer readable medium can be any apparatus that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport eh program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
The medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium. Examples of a computer-readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk. Current examples of optical disks include compact disk—read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk—read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.
A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code will include at least one processor coupled directly or indirectly to memory elements through a system bus. The memory elements can include local memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memories which provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code must be retrieved from bulk storage during execution.
Input/output or I/O devices (including but not limited to keyboards, displays, point devices, etc.) can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers.
Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems, cable modem and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified local function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
In one embodiment, data network 153 includes an Internet Protocol (IP) network, a corporate data network, a regional corporate data network, an Internet service provider network, a residential data network, a wired network such as Ethernet, a wireless network such as a WiFi network, or a cellular network. In one embodiment, data network 153 resides in a data center, or connects to a network or application network cloud.
Client device 100 is typically a computing device with network access capabilities. In one embodiment, client device 100 is a workstation, a desktop personal computer or a laptop personal computer, a Personal Data Assistant (PDA), a tablet computing device, a smartphone, or a cellular phone, a set-top box, an Internet media viewer, an Internet media player, a smart sensor, a smart medical device, a net-top box, a networked television set, a networked DVR, a networked Blu-ray player, a networked handheld gaming device, or a media center.
In one embodiment, client device 100 is a residential broadband gateway, a business Internet gateway, a business Web proxy server, a network customer premise device (CPE), or an Internet access gateway.
In one embodiment, client device 100 includes a broadband remote access server (BRAS), a Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer (DSLAM), a Cable Modem Terminating System (CMTS), or a service provider access gateway.
In one embodiment, client device 100 includes a mobile broadband access gateway such as a Gateway GPRS Support Node (GGSN), a Home Agent (HA), or a PDN Gateway (PGW).
In one embodiment, client device 100 includes a server load balancer, an application delivery controller, a traffic manager, a firewall, a VPN server, a remote access server, or an enterprise or datacenter access gateway.
In one embodiment, client device 100 is a device that performs functions similar to service gateway 300.
Client device 100 initiates TCP session 400 towards server 200 via service gateway 300.
Server 200 is a computing device typically coupled to a processor and a computer readable medium which stores computer readable program code. Server 200, with the processor and the computer readable program code, implements functionality of a Web server, a file server, a video server, a database server, an application server, a voice system, a conferencing server, a media gateway, a media center, an app server or a network server providing a TCP-based service or an application service to client device 100 using the TCP session 400.
In one embodiment, server 200 is a device that performs functions similar to service gateway 300.
In one embodiment, TCP session 400 includes a HTTP session, a FTP file transfer session, a TCP-based video streaming session, a TCP-based music streaming session, a file download session, a group conferencing session, a database access session, a remote terminal access session, a Telnet session, an e-commerce transaction, a remote procedure call, or an TCP-based network communication sessions.
Service gateway 300 is operationally coupled to a processor 310, a memory module 320, a network module 330, and a computer readable medium 340. The computer readable medium 340 stores computer readable program code, which when executed by the processor 310 using the memory module 320, implements the various embodiments of the present invention as described herein. In some embodiments, service gateway 300 is implemented as a server load balancer, an application delivery controller, a service delivery platform, a traffic manager, a security gateway, a component of a firewall system, a component of a virtual private network (VPN), a load balancer for video servers, a gateway to distribute load to one or more servers, a Web or HTTP server, a network address translation (NAT) gateway, or a TCP proxy server.
In one embodiment of servicing TCP proxy session 400 between client device 100 and server 200, service gateway 300 establishes a client side TCP session 420 with client device 100, and a server side TCP session 470 with server 200.
In one embodiment, computer readable medium 340 includes instructions for a service application 350 and processor 310 executes service application 350.
In one embodiment, service application 350 implements functionality of a VPN firewall, a gateway security application, a HTTP proxy, a TCP-based audio or video streaming session proxy, a Web session proxy, content filtering, server load balancing, firewall, or a network application session proxy.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 includes a memory buffer 327 for processing TCP proxy session 400. In one embodiment, memory buffer 327 capacity is pre-determined, for example 1 MB, 400 KB, 200 KB or 2 MB. In an embodiment, service gateway 300 reserves a portion of memory module 320 as memory buffer 327 to process TCP proxy session 400.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 allocates a client side send buffer 424 for client side TCP session 420 and a server side receive buffer 474 for server side TCP session 470, where client side send buffer 424 and server side receive buffer 474 reside in memory buffer 327.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 monitors a dynamic server side network behavior 460 for server side session TCP 470 and a dynamic client side network behavior 410 for client side TCP session 420. Service gateway 300 allocates client side send buffer 424 and allocates server side receive buffer 474 based on dynamic client side network behavior 410 and dynamic server side network behavior 460.
In one embodiment as illustrated in
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 determines that available capacity 484 of server side receive buffer 474 is sufficient to store data packet 479. Service gateway 300 stores data packet 479 into server side receive buffer 474 and reduces available capacity 484 by the amount of memory space necessary to store data packet 479.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 determines available capacity 484 is not sufficient, service gateway 300 increases the allocated capacity 494 of server side receive buffer 474, and adjusts available capacity 484 according to the increase of allocated capacity 494. If the adjusted available capacity 484 is sufficient, service gateway 300 stores data packet 479 into server side receive buffer 474 and reduces available capacity 484 according to the memory space necessary to store data packet 479.
In one embodiment where service gateway 300 determines available capacity 484 is insufficient, even after adjustment, service gateway 300 discards data packet 479.
In one embodiment, service application 350 retrieves data packet 479 from server side receive buffer 474. Service gateway 300 removes data packet 479 from server side receive buffer 474 and increases available capacity 484 according to the memory space consumed by data packet 479.
In one embodiment as illustrated in
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 determines available capacity 434 is not sufficient, service gateway 300 increases allocated capacity 444 of client side send buffer 424, and adjusts available capacity 434 according to the increase of allocated capacity 444. If the adjusted available capacity 434 is sufficient, service gateway 300 stores data packet 429 into client side send buffer 424 and reduces available capacity 434 according to the memory space necessary to store data packet 429.
In one embodiment where service gateway 300 determines available capacity 434 is insufficient, even after adjustment, service gateway 300 discards data packet 429. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 waits until available capacity 434 becomes sufficient after adjustment.
In one embodiment, network module 330 successfully transmits data packet 429 from client side send buffer 424. Service gateway 300 removes data packet 429 from client side send buffer 424 and increases available capacity 434 according to the memory space consumed by data packet 429.
In an embodiment illustrated in
Service gateway 300 measures or estimates server side RTT 462 for server side session 470. In one example embodiment, service gateway 300 measures server side RTT 462 based on a duration between a time service gateway 300 sending a data packet of server side session 470 to server 200 and a time service gateway 300 receiving an acknowledgement for the sent data packet. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 measures RTT 462 from time to time during server side TCP session 470. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 estimates server side RTT 462 based on one or more prior server side TCP sessions with server 200. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 estimates server side RTT 462 to be 10 milliseconds, 100 milliseconds, 3 milliseconds, 22 milliseconds, or 3 seconds.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates server side transmission rate 463 as a bandwidth of a network interface used by network module 330 to receive data packets of server side TCP session 470. In one embodiment, server side transmission rate 463 is the bandwidth of a virtual network interface. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates server side transmission rate 463 by calculating one or more transmission rate of one or data packets of server side TCP session 470 over a period of time. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates a new transmission rate 463 from time to time. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates server side transmission rate 463 to be 1 Mbps, 43 Mbps, 100 Mbps, 1 Gbps, 600 Mbps, 25 Mbps or 10 Gbps.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 monitors dynamic client side network behavior 410 of client side session 420. In one embodiment, dynamic client side network behavior 410 includes a client side data packet round trip time (RTT) 412, a client side transmission rate 413, or a dynamic network attribute that affects service gateway 300 sending data packet 429. In one embodiment, client side RTT 412 affects the time data packet 429 is transmitted through data network 153. In one embodiment, client side transmission rate 413 affects the rate of sending data packet 429 by network module 330. In one embodiment, RTT 412 and transmission rate 413 are related.
Service gateway 300 measures or estimates client side RTT 412. In one example embodiment, service gateway 300 measures client side RTT 412 based on a duration between a time service gateway 300 sends a data packet of client side session 420 to client device 100 and a time service gateway 300 receives an acknowledgement for the sent data packet. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 measures RTT 412 from time to time during client side TCP session 420. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 estimates client side RTT 412 based on one or more prior server side TCP sessions with client device 100. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 estimates server side RTT 462 to be 10 milliseconds, 100 milliseconds, 3 milliseconds, 22 milliseconds, or 3 seconds.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates client side transmission rate 413 as a bandwidth of a network interface used by network module 330 to transmit data packets of client side TCP session 420. In one embodiment, client side transmission rate 413 is the bandwidth of a virtual network interface. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates client side transmission rate 413 by calculating one or more transmission rate of one or data packets of client side TCP session 420 over a period of time. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates a new transmission rate 413 from time to time. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates client side transmission rate 413 to be 1 Mbps, 43 Mbps, 100 Mbps, 1 Gbps, 600 Mbps, 25 Mbps or 10 Gbps.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates the maximum capacity 492 for server side receive buffer 474 and maximum capacity 442 client side send buffer 424. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates using RTT 462 and RTT 412 according to equation 1 and equation 2, using a weighted average of capacity 328 of memory buffer 327 based on RTT 462 and RTT 412. The weighted average has a bias towards server side receive buffer 474.
Equation 1 and equation 2 illustrate an embodiment wherein the sum of maximum capacity 492 and maximum capacity 442 equals capacity 328. In this embodiment, the factor of 2 for RTT 462 is selected such that service gateway 300 advertises ½ or half the maximum capacity 492 of server side receive buffer 474 for server side TCP session 470. It is appropriate to adjust the factor 2 with a different factor relating to the portion of server side receive buffer 474 advertised for server side TCP session 470.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 obtains a new measurement of server side RTT 462 and/or a new measurement of client side RTT 412. Service gateway 300 applies equation 1 and equation 2 to modify maximum capacity 492 and maximum capacity 442.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 further considers server side transmission rate 463 and client side transmission rate 413. Service gateway calculates using equation 3 and equation 4, using a weighted average of capacity 328 based on combination of transmission rate 463 and RTT 462, and transmission rate 413 and RTT 412. The weighted average has a bias towards server side receive buffer 474.
maximum capacity 492=((2*transmission rate 463*RTT 462)/(transmission rate 413*RTT 412+2*transmission rate 463*RTT 462))*capacity 328 Equation 3
maximum capacity 442=((transmission rate 413*RTT 412)/(transmission rate 413*RTT 412+2*transmission rate 463*RTT 462))*capacity 328 Equation 4
Equation 3 and equation 4 illustrate an embodiment wherein the sum of maximum capacity 492 and maximum capacity 442 equals capacity 328.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 obtains a new server side transmission rate 463 and/or a new client side transmission rate 413. Service gateway 300 applies equations 3 and 4 to modify maximum capacity 492 and maximum capacity 442. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 obtains a new measurement of server side RTT 462 and/or a new measurement of client side RTT 412. Service gateway 300 applies equation 3 and equation 4 to modify maximum capacity 492 and maximum capacity 442.
In
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 determines there is sufficient memory space within maximum capacity 492 to store data packet 479. Service gateway 300 allocates a memory space 321 from memory buffer 327. In one embodiment, memory space 321 has a capacity 322. Service gateway 300 increases allocated capacity 494 of server side receive buffer 474 by an amount of capacity 322, and includes memory space 321 into server side receive buffer 474. Service gateway 300 allocates memory space 321 such that adjusted allocated capacity 494 does not exceed maximum capacity 492 of server side receive buffer 474. After storing data packet 479 into the updated server side receive buffer 474, service gateway 300 updates available capacity 484 of server side receive buffer 474 using capacity 322, and the space consumed by data packet 479.
In
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 determines there is sufficient memory space within maximum capacity 442 to store data packet 429. Service gateway 300 allocates a memory space 325 from memory buffer 327. In one embodiment, memory space 325 has a capacity 326. Service gateway 300 increases allocated capacity 444 of client side send buffer 424 by an amount of capacity 326, and includes memory space 325 into client side send buffer 424. Service gateway 300 allocates memory space 325 such that adjusted allocated capacity 444 does not exceed maximum capacity 442 of client side send buffer 424. After storing data packet 429 into the updated client side send buffer 424, service gateway 300 updates available capacity 434 using capacity 326, and the space consumed by data packet 429.
In one embodiment, client device 100 sends a data packet 421 to service gateway 300 via client side TCP session 420. As illustrated in
Service gateway 300 uses client side receive buffer 426 and server side send buffer 476 to handle data packet 421. Service gateway 300 receives data packet 421 and stores data packet 421 in client side receive buffer 426. Service application 350 retrieves data packet 421 from client side receive buffer 426, and generates a data packet 471 based on data packet 421. Service application 350 places data packet 471 in server side send buffer 476. Service gateway 300 transmits data packet 471 from server side send buffer 476 to server 200.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 reserves a pre-determined capacity 378 of memory buffer 377 to handle TCP proxy session 400. In one embodiment, capacity 378 of memory buffer 377 is the same as capacity 328 of memory buffer 327. In one embodiment, capacity 378 is different from capacity 328.
In one embodiment, RTT 462 of network condition 460 affects sending of data packet 471. In one embodiment, network condition 460 includes a server side transmission rate 464. Service gateway 300 calculates server side transmission rate 464 as the bandwidth of a network interface used by network module 330 to transmit data packets of server side TCP session 470. In one embodiment, server side transmission rate 464 is the bandwidth of a virtual network interface. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates server side transmission rate 464 by calculating one or more transmission rate of one or data packets of server side TCP session 470 over a period of time. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates a new transmission rate 464 from time to time. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates server side transmission rate 464 to be 1 Mbps, 43 Mbps, 100 Mbps, 1 Gbps, 600 Mbps, 25 Mbps or 10 Gbps.
In one embodiment, RTT 412 of network condition 410 also affects receiving of data packet 421. In one embodiment, network condition 410 includes a client side transmission rate 414. Service gateway 300 calculates client side transmission rate 414 as the bandwidth of a network interface used by network module 330 to receive data packets of client side TCP session 420. In one embodiment, client side transmission rate 414 is the bandwidth of a virtual network interface. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates client side transmission rate 414 by calculating one or more transmission rate of one or data packets of client side TCP session 420 over a period of time. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates a new transmission rate 414 from time to time. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates client side transmission rate 414 to be 1 Mbps, 43 Mbps, 100 Mbps, 1 Gbps, 600 Mbps, 25 Mbps or 10 Gbps.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 calculates maximum capacity 498 and maximum capacity 448, using network condition 460 and network condition 410, according to equation 5 and equation 6, using a weighted average of capacity 378 based on RTT 462 and RTT 412. The weighted average has a bias towards client side receive buffer 426.
Equation 5 and equation 6 illustrate an embodiment wherein the sum of maximum capacity 498 and maximum capacity 448 equals capacity 378. In this embodiment, the factor of 2 for RTT 412 is selected such that service gateway 300 advertises ½ or half the maximum capacity 448 of client side receive buffer 426 for client side TCP session 420. It is appropriate to adjust the factor 2 with a different factor relating to the portion of client side receive buffer 426 advertised for client side TCP session 420.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 obtains a new measurement of server side RTT 462 and/or a new measurement of client side RTT 412. Service gateway 300 applies equation 5 and equation 6 to modify maximum capacity 498 and maximum capacity 448.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 further considers server side transmission rate 464 and client side transmission rate 414. Service gateway calculates using equation 7 and equation 8, using a weighted average of capacity 378 based on combination of transmission rate 464 and RTT 462, and transmission rate 414 and RTT 412. The weighted average has a bias towards client side receive buffer 426.
maximum capacity 498=((transmission rate 464*RTT 462)/(2*transmission rate 414*RTT 412+transmission rate 464*RTT 462))*capacity 378 Equation 7
maximum capacity 448=((2*transmission rate 414*RTT 412)/(2*transmission rate 414*RTT 412+transmission rate 464*RTT 462))*capacity 378 Equation 9
Equation 7 and equation 8 illustrate an embodiment wherein the sum of maximum capacity 498 and maximum capacity 448 equals capacity 378.
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 obtains a new server side transmission rate 464 and/or a new client side transmission rate 414, service gateway 300 applies equation 7 and equation 8 to modify maximum capacity 498 and maximum capacity 448. In one embodiment, service gateway 300 obtains a new measurement of server side RTT 462 and/or a new measurement of client side RTT 412, service gateway 300 applies equation 7 and equation 8 to modify maximum capacity 492 and maximum capacity 442.
In
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 determines there is sufficient memory space within maximum capacity 448 to store data packet 421. Service gateway 300 allocates memory space 375 from memory buffer 377. In one embodiment, memory space 375 has a capacity 376. Service gateway 300 increases allocated capacity 446 by an amount of capacity 376, and includes memory space 375 into client side receive buffer 426. Service gateway 300 allocates memory space 375 such that adjusted allocated capacity 446 does not exceed maximum capacity 448 of client side send buffer 426. After storing data packet 421 into the updated client side receive buffer 426, service gateway 300 updates available capacity 436 of client side receive buffer 426 using capacity 376, and the space consumed by data packet 421.
In
In one embodiment, service gateway 300 determines there is sufficient memory space within maximum capacity 498 to store data packet 471. Service gateway 300 allocates a memory space 371 from memory buffer 377. In one embodiment, memory space 371 has a capacity 372. Service gateway 300 increases allocated capacity 496 by an amount of capacity 372, and includes memory space 371 into server side send buffer 476. Service gateway 300 allocates memory space 371 such that adjusted allocated capacity 496 does not exceed maximum capacity 498. After storing data packet 471 into the updated server side send buffer 476, service gateway 300 updates available capacity 486 of server side send buffer 476 using capacity 372, and the space consumed by data packet 471.
In one embodiment, service application 350 retrieves data packet 471 from client side receive buffer 426. Service gateway 300 removes data packet 471 from client side receive buffer 426 and increase available capacity 436 according to the memory space consumed by data packet 471.
In one embodiment, network module 330 successfully transmits data packet 471 from server side send buffer 476. Service gateway 300 remove data packet 471 from server side send buffer 476 and increases available capacity 486 according to the memory space consumed by data packet 471.
Although the present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and those variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/573,704 filed on Dec. 17, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,154,584 issued on Oct. 6, 2015 and entitled “Allocating Buffer for TCP Proxy Session Based on Dynamic Network Conditions”, which in turn is a continuation of and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/293,641 filed on Jun. 2, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,749 issued on Mar. 10, 2015 and entitled “Allocating Buffer for TCP Proxy Session Based on Dynamic Network Conditions”, which in turn is a continuation of and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/541,792 filed on Jul. 5, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,782,221 issued on Jul. 15, 2014 and entitled “Method to Allocate Buffer for TCP Proxy Session Based on Dynamic Network Conditions”. The disclosures of each of the above-referenced applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5218602 | Grant et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5862339 | Bonnaure et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5875185 | Wang et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5935207 | Logue et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5958053 | Denker | Sep 1999 | A |
6003069 | Cavill | Dec 1999 | A |
6047268 | Bartoli et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6075783 | Voit | Jun 2000 | A |
6131163 | Wiegel | Oct 2000 | A |
6219706 | Fan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6259705 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6321338 | Porras et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6374300 | Masters | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6456617 | Oda et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459682 | Ellesson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483600 | Schuster et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6535516 | Leu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6578066 | Logan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587866 | Modi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600738 | Alperovich et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6658114 | Farn et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6748414 | Bournas | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6772205 | Lavian et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6772334 | Glawitsch | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6779033 | Watson et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6804224 | Schuster et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7010605 | Dharmarajan | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7013482 | Krumel | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7058718 | Fontes et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069438 | Balabine et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076555 | Orman et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7143087 | Fairweather | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7167927 | Philbrick et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181524 | Lele | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7228359 | Monteiro | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7234161 | Maufer et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7236457 | Joe | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7254133 | Govindarajan et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269850 | Govindarajan et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277963 | Dolson et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7301899 | Goldstone | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308499 | Chavez | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310686 | Uysal | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7328267 | Bashyam et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7334232 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337241 | Boucher et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343399 | Hayball et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349970 | Clement et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7370353 | Yang | May 2008 | B2 |
7373500 | Ramelson et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7391725 | Huitema et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398317 | Chen et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7423977 | Joshi | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7430755 | Hughes et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7463648 | Eppstein et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7467202 | Savchuk | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7472190 | Robinson | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7492766 | Cabeca et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7506360 | Wilkinson et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7509369 | Tormasov | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7512980 | Copeland et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7533409 | Keane et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7552323 | Shay | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7584262 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7584301 | Joshi | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7590736 | Hydrie et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7610622 | Touitou et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613193 | Swami et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7613822 | Joy et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7673072 | Boucher et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7675854 | Chen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7703102 | Eppstein et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7707295 | Szeto et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7711790 | Barrett et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7733866 | Mishra et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747748 | Allen | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7765328 | Bryers et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7792113 | Foschiano et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7808994 | Vinokour et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7826487 | Mukerji et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7881215 | Daigle et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7948952 | Hurtta et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7965727 | Sakata | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970934 | Patel | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7979694 | Touitou et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983258 | Ruben et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7990847 | Leroy et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7991859 | Miller et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7992201 | Aldridge et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8019870 | Eppstein et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8032634 | Eppstein et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8081640 | Ozawa et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8090866 | Bashyam et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8099492 | Dahlin | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8116312 | Riddoch et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8122116 | Matsunaga | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8151019 | Le et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8179809 | Eppstein et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8185651 | Moran et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8191106 | Choyi et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8224971 | Miller et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8261339 | Aldridge et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8296434 | Miller et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8312507 | Chen et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8379515 | Mukerji | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8499093 | Grosser et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8539075 | Bali et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8554929 | Szeto et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8559437 | Mishra et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8560693 | Wang et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8584199 | Chen et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8595791 | Chen et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
RE44701 | Chen et al. | Jan 2014 | E |
8675488 | Sidebottom et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8681610 | Mukerji | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8750164 | Casado et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8782221 | Han | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8813180 | Chen et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8826372 | Chen et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8879427 | Krumel | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8885463 | Medved et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8897154 | Jalan et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8965957 | Barros | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8977749 | Han | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8990262 | Chen et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9094364 | Jalan et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9106561 | Jalan et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9137301 | Dunlap et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9154584 | Han | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9215275 | Kannan et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9219751 | Chen et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9253152 | Chen et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9270705 | Chen et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9270774 | Jalan et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9386088 | Zheng et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9531846 | Han et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20010042200 | Lamberton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049741 | Skene et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020026515 | Michielsens et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032777 | Kawata et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032799 | Wiedeman et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020078164 | Reinschmidt | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091844 | Craft et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103916 | Chen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133491 | Sim et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138618 | Szabo | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141386 | Minert et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143991 | Chow et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178259 | Doyle et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188678 | Edecker et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191575 | Kalavade et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194335 | Maynard | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194350 | Lu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009591 | Hayball et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014544 | Pettey | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023711 | Parmar et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023873 | Ben-Itzhak | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030035409 | Wang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035420 | Niu | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030061506 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030131245 | Linderman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135625 | Fontes et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030195962 | Kikuchi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040010545 | Pandya | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040062246 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073703 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078419 | Ferrari et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078480 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103315 | Cooper et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111516 | Cain | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040187032 | Gels et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199616 | Karhu | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199646 | Susai et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202182 | Lund et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210623 | Hydrie et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210663 | Phillips et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213158 | Collett et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040250059 | Ramelson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005207 | Herneque | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009520 | Herrero et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021848 | Jorgenson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027862 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036501 | Chung et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036511 | Baratakke et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039033 | Meyers et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044270 | Grove et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050074013 | Hershey et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080890 | Yang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102400 | Nakahara et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125276 | Rusu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050163073 | Heller et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050198335 | Brown et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213586 | Cyganski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240989 | Kim et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249225 | Singhal | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281190 | McGee et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060023721 | Miyake et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036610 | Wang | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036733 | Fujimoto et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041745 | Parnes | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060069774 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069804 | Miyake et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077926 | Rune | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060092950 | Arregoces et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098645 | Walkin | May 2006 | A1 |
20060164978 | Werner et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168319 | Trossen | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060187901 | Cortes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190997 | Mahajani et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209789 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230129 | Swami et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233100 | Luft et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251057 | Kwon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277303 | Hegde et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280121 | Matoba | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070019543 | Wei et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022479 | Sikdar et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070076653 | Park et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086382 | Narayanan et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094396 | Takano et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118881 | Mitchell et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124502 | Li | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156919 | Potti et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165622 | O'Rourke et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180119 | Khivesara et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185998 | Touitou et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195792 | Chen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230337 | Igarashi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242738 | Park et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070243879 | Park et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245090 | King et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248009 | Petersen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070259673 | Willars et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283429 | Chen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070286077 | Wu | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288247 | Mackay | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294209 | Strub et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080016161 | Tsirtsis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031263 | Ervin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080076432 | Senarath et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080101396 | Miyata | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109452 | Patterson | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109870 | Sherlock et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120129 | Seubert et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134332 | Keohane et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162679 | Maher et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080225722 | Khemani et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228781 | Chen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080250099 | Shen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253390 | Das et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271130 | Ramamoorthy | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080291911 | Lee et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298303 | Tsirtsis | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090024722 | Sethuraman et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031415 | Aldridge et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049198 | Blinn et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070470 | Bauman et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077651 | Poeluev | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092124 | Singhal et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106830 | Maher | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138606 | Moran et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138945 | Savchuk | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141634 | Rothstein et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164614 | Christian et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090172093 | Matsubara | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090213858 | Dolganow et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222583 | Josefsberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090227228 | Hu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228547 | Miyaoka et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090262741 | Jungck et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090285196 | Lee et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313379 | Rydnell et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100008229 | Bi et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023621 | Ezolt et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036952 | Hazlewood et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054139 | Chun et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061319 | Aso et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100064008 | Yan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082787 | Kommula et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100083076 | Ushiyama | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094985 | Abu-Samaha et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095018 | Khemani et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106833 | Banerjee et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106854 | Kim et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100162378 | Jayawardena et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100205310 | Altshuler | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210265 | Borzsei et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217793 | Preiss | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217819 | Chen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223630 | Degenkolb et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228819 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235507 | Szeto et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235522 | Chen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235880 | Chen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238828 | Russell | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265824 | Chao et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268814 | Cross et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100293296 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312740 | Clemm et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318631 | Shukla | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322252 | Suganthi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100330971 | Selitser et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333101 | Pope et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007652 | Bai | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019550 | Bryers et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110023071 | Li et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029599 | Pulleyn et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032941 | Quach et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040826 | Chadzelek et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047294 | Singh et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060831 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083174 | Aldridge et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093522 | Chen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099623 | Garrard et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110294 | Valluri et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110145324 | Reinart et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149879 | Noriega et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153834 | Bharrat | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110185073 | Jagadeeswaran et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191773 | Pavel et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110196971 | Reguraman et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110276695 | Maldaner | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276982 | Nakayama et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289496 | Steer | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110292939 | Subramaian et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302256 | Sureshehandra et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307541 | Walsh et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120008495 | Shen | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023231 | Ueno | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120026897 | Guichard et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120030341 | Jensen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120066371 | Patel et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084419 | Kannan et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120084460 | McGinnity et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120117382 | Larson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117571 | Davis et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120144014 | Natham et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120144015 | Jalan et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151353 | Joanny | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170548 | Rajagopalan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173759 | Agarwal et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191839 | Maynard | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215910 | Wada | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120239792 | Banerjee et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240185 | Kapoor et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120290727 | Tivig | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120297046 | Raja et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130046876 | Narayana et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058335 | Koponen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130074177 | Varadhan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130083725 | Mallya et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130100958 | Jalan et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130124713 | Feinberg et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130135996 | Torres et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130136139 | Zheng et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130148500 | Sonoda et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166762 | Jalan et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173795 | McPherson | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130176854 | Chisu et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191486 | Someya et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198385 | Han et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130250765 | Ehsan et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130258846 | Damola | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282791 | Kruglick | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140012972 | Han | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140089500 | Sankar et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140164617 | Jalan et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169168 | Jalan et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140207845 | Han et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140258465 | Li | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140258536 | Chiong | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269728 | Jalan et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286313 | Fu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140298091 | Carlen et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330982 | Jalan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140334485 | Jain et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140359052 | Joachimpillai et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150039671 | Jalan et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150156223 | Xu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150215436 | Kancherla | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150237173 | Virkki et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244566 | Puimedon | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150281087 | Jalan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150281104 | Golshan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150296058 | Jalan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312092 | Golshan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312268 | Ray | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150333988 | Jalan et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150350048 | Sampat et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150350379 | Jalan et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160014126 | Jalan et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036778 | Chen et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160042014 | Jalan et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160043901 | Sankar et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160044095 | Sankar et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160050233 | Chen et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160088074 | Kannan et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160105395 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160105446 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1372662 | Oct 2002 | CN |
1449618 | Oct 2003 | CN |
1473300 | Feb 2004 | CN |
1529460 | Sep 2004 | CN |
1575582 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1714545 | Dec 2005 | CN |
1725702 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1910869 | Feb 2007 | CN |
101004740 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101094225 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101163336 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101169785 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101189598 | May 2008 | CN |
101247349 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101261644 | Sep 2008 | CN |
101442425 | May 2009 | CN |
101682532 | Mar 2010 | CN |
102123156 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102546590 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102571742 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102577252 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102918801 | Feb 2013 | CN |
103533018 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103944954 | Jul 2014 | CN |
104040990 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104067569 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104106241 | Oct 2014 | CN |
104137491 | Nov 2014 | CN |
104796396 | Jul 2015 | CN |
102577252 | Mar 2016 | CN |
1209876 | May 2002 | EP |
1770915 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1885096 | Feb 2008 | EP |
02296313 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2577910 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2622795 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2647174 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2760170 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2772026 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2901308 | Aug 2015 | EP |
1182560 | Nov 2013 | HK |
1183569 | Dec 2013 | HK |
1183996 | Jan 2014 | HK |
1189438 | Jun 2014 | HK |
1198565 | May 2015 | HK |
1198848 | Jun 2015 | HK |
1199153 | Jun 2015 | HK |
1199779 | Jul 2015 | HK |
1200617 | Aug 2015 | HK |
261CHE2014 | Jul 2016 | IN |
H09-097233 | Apr 1997 | JP |
1999096128 | Apr 1999 | JP |
H11-338836 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000276432 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000307634 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001051859 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2003141068 | May 2003 | JP |
2005141441 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006332825 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2008040718 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2013528330 | Jul 2013 | JP |
2014143686 | Aug 2014 | JP |
2015507380 | Mar 2015 | JP |
5855663 | Dec 2015 | JP |
5906263 | Apr 2016 | JP |
100830413 | May 2008 | KR |
20130096624 | Aug 2013 | KR |
101576585 | Dec 2015 | KR |
269763 | Feb 1996 | TW |
425821 | Mar 2001 | TW |
444478 | Jul 2001 | TW |
WO0113228 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0114990 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0145349 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO03103237 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004084085 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO2006098033 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO2008053954 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008078593 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO2011049770 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO2011079381 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO2011149796 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO2012050747 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012075237 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO2013070391 | May 2013 | WO |
WO2013081952 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013096019 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013112492 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2014031046 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO2014052099 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO2014088741 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO2014093829 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO2014138483 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014144837 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014179753 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO2015153020 | Oct 2015 | WO |
WO2015164026 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cardellini et al., “Dynamic Load Balancing on Web-server Systems”, IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 28-39, May-Jun. 1999. |
Spatscheck et al., “Optimizing TCP Forwarder Performance”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 8, No. 2, Apr. 2000. |
Kjaer et al. “Resource allocation and disturbance rejection in web servers using SLAs and virtualized servers”, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, IEEE, US, vol. 6, No. 4, Dec. 1, 2009. |
Sharifian et al. “An approximation-based load-balancing algorithm with admission control for cluster web servers with dynamic workloads”, The Journal of Supercomputing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, BO, vol. 53, No. 3, Jul. 3, 2009. |
Goldszmidt et al. NetDispatcher: A TCP Connection Router, IBM Research Report RC 20853, May 19, 1997. |
Koike et al., “Transport Middleware for Network-Based Control,” IEICE Technical Report, Jun. 22, 2000, vol. 100, No. 53, pp. 13-18. |
Yamamoto et al., “Performance Evaluation of Window Size in Proxy-based TCP for Multi-hop Wireless Networks,” IPSJ SIG Technical Reports, May 15, 2008, vol. 2008, No. 44, pp. 109-114. |
Abe et al., “Adaptive Split Connection Schemes in Advanced Relay Nodes,” IEICE Technical Report, Feb. 22, 2010, vol. 109, No. 438, pp. 25-30. |
Gite, Vivek, “Linux Tune Network Stack (Buffers Size) to Increase Networking Performance,” accessed Apr. 13, 2016 at URL: <<http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-tcp-tuning/>>, Jul. 8, 2009, 24 pages. |
“Tcp—TCP Protocol”, Linux Programmer's Manual, accessed Apr. 13, 2016 at URL: <<https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=tcp&apropos=0&sektion=7&manpath=SuSE+Linux%2Fi386+11.0&format=asci>>, Nov. 25, 2007, 11 pages. |
In Journal 39/2015, Sep. 25, 2015, Jalan et al., In Cumulative version of WO2013070391. |
“Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol”, Cisco, Document ID 16406, Sep. 9, 2005 update, 43 pages. |
Crotti, Manuel et al., “Detecting HTTP Tunnels with Statistical Mechanisms”, IEEE International Conference on Communications, Jun. 24-28, 2007, pp. 6162-6168. |
Haruyama, Takahiro et al., “Dial-to-Connect VPN System for Remote DLNA Communication”, IEEE Consumer communications and Networking Conference, CCNC 2008. 5th IEEE, Jan. 10-12, 2008, pp. 1224-1225. |
Chen, Jianhua et al., “SSL/TLS-based Secure Tunnel Gateway System Design and Implementation”, IEEE International Workshop on Anti-counterfeiting, Security, Identification, Apr. 16-18, 2007, pp. 258-261. |
“EIGRP MPLS VPN PE-CE Site of Origin (SoO)”, Cisco Systems, Feb. 28, 2006, 14 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160014052 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14573704 | Dec 2014 | US |
Child | 14863083 | US | |
Parent | 14293641 | Jun 2014 | US |
Child | 14573704 | US | |
Parent | 13541792 | Jul 2012 | US |
Child | 14293641 | US |