The invention relates to the field of boards for gliding over snow, and in particular alpine skis.
It is more particularly directed at an alpine ski having a particular sidecut, providing it with specific properties in terms of behavior on snow, in particular for advanced practices in racing.
In general, an alpine ski has different zones distributed over its length, namely a tip zone located at the front and curved upwards to overcome obstacles, a tail zone, located at the rear of the ski and also slightly raised, as well as a waist zone extending between the tail and the tip. The waist ensures that the ski glides by its underside, formed of a gliding sole bordered by edges, and receiving the mounting elements of the safety binding on the topside.
In general, although not mandatory, skis are symmetrical with respect to their median longitudinal plane, which extends from the front end to the rear end of the ski. The sidecut is defined as the line that represents the lateral contour of the ski, which can be more or less deepened.
In a standardized way, a “back contact line” and a “front contact line” are defined on the ski, which are the front and rear limits of the contact surface of the underside when the ski is applied to a flat surface, in particular by loading the ski at the waist to cancel its camber. Meanwhile, a sidecut is defined between the two widest points of the ski, located at the front and at the rear. There has been a trend towards making alpine skis with the widest point beyond the front contact line, so that the ski widens a little in the tip section before arriving at the front tip of the ski. The same trend is observed for the rear part of the ski, with a line of greater rear width, which can be located further back than the rear contact line, even inside the tail zone.
Many solutions have been proposed to produce particular behaviors when steering the ski, by ensuring a more or less significant deepening of the sidecut.
Conventionally, skis are designed to have a sidecut in the waist zone that lies on a circle, so that the radius of curvature of the sidecut is generally constant over the entire waist, with a well-localized center of curvature, resulting in curves substantially centered on this point. Other solutions have been proposed to ensure a progression or variation of the radius of curvature along the sidecut, such as that illustrated in the Applicant's document FR2985914. The curvature of the sidecut of the ski described herein varies in such a way that it is oriented outwards in the central part of the waist, and oriented towards the inside of the ski in the front and rear zones of the waist up to the tip and tail, respectively. Such a geometry is supposed to ensure a particular distribution of forces along the sidecut, when the ski is tilted on the edge, with a view to making it easier to steer the ski.
This configuration is therefore not necessarily compatible with the quest for performance, especially in ski racing.
To solve this problem, the invention proposes an alpine ski comprising a tip zone located at the front of the ski, a waist zone, and a tail zone located at the rear of the ski, a median longitudinal plane extending from the front end to the rear end of the ski, an underside formed by a gliding sole bordered by edges. Classically, this ski features a binding mounting zone, the position of which is determined by a “mounting point” (PM), as defined in ISO 6289 and ISO 5355. This mounting point is intended to be aligned longitudinally with a mark on the boot held by the binding, which is located at a mid-boot line (MC). In the following, the mounting point and the mid-shoe line are assumed to be at the same longitudinal level and are therefore to be considered as identical.
The sidecut of this ski has:
said sidecut having a variable radius of curvature between the front contact line (PA) and the rear contact line (PB),
According to one aspect of the invention, this ski is characterized in that the width of the ski, measured perpendicular to the median longitudinal plane, at the front contact line (PA) is strictly less than the width of the ski measured at the rear contact line (PB).
In other words, the width of the ski at the border between the waist and the tail is greater than the same width measured at the border between the waist and the tip. In other words, the width of the gliding zone is greater behind than in front of the waist zone.
Additionally, the zone of minimum width (PIII) of the ski is located further forward than the mid-boot line (MC).
Advantageously in practice, the distance between the width at the front contact line (PA) and the width at the rear contact line (PB) is between 2 and 10 mm.
In preferred embodiments, the distance between the zone of minimum width (PIII) and the mid-shoe line (MC) is greater than 2 mm, preferably 5 mm, and less than or equal to 100 mm.
According to another aspect of the invention, the radius of curvature has a maximum value at a transverse line located strictly between the front contact line (PA) and the rear contact line (PB),
And the ratio between the maximum radius of curvature value and the value of the radius of curvature at the front contact line is greater than 2.5, preferably greater than 3.
In other words, the invention consists in providing the ski with a particular geometry in which the radius of curvature is highly variable between the front contact line and the rear contact line, with a very marked maximum, i.e., a relatively low curvature in this zone, compared to the curvature measured near the tail and the tip.
In other words, the ski according to the invention has a relatively straight sidecut in the zone where the boot is fitted, whereas closer to the front and back contact lines, i.e., at the ends of the waist, the curvature is more pronounced, ensuring the deepening of the sidecut. Advantageously in practice, it has been found that the ski's behavior is all the more effective and advantageous in racing, while maintaining a ski that is tolerant of terrain imperfections, when the ratio between the value of the maximum radius of curvature and the greater of the two radii of curvature at the front and rear contact lines is greater than 2.5. This ratio can be even higher, in excess of 3, or even 4 for advanced racing skis. In other words, a particularly interesting geometry is one in which the difference between the very large radius of curvature at the center of the waist zone and the larger of the relatively small radii of curvature at the front or rear contact line is the greatest.
At the same time, the Applicant has observed that this geometry is particularly advantageous when the line of the middle of the boot is located slightly set back with respect to the narrowest zone of the ski. In other words, the narrow point of the ski is located forward of the mid-boot mark. The ski's behavior is further improved by the fact that the very low-curvature region is therefore located in front of the mid-boot line, notably for ease of initiating the turn and entering a curve.
According to another feature of the invention, the variation of the radius of curvature of the sidecut according to the longitudinal position of the measuring point is a function whose second derivative with respect to said longitudinal position is positive for a longitudinal position between the rear contact line and the front contact line.
In other words, the measurement of the radius of curvature along the sidecut is such that its increase increases as it moves from the rear contact point towards the maximum. And this decrease also increases from its maximum to the front contact point. In other words, the variation in radius of curvature increases from the point of rear contact to the point of minimum curvature, and this same variation diminishes from this maximum to the vicinity of the front contact line.
Advantageously in practice, the transverse line where the radius of curvature is maximum is located approximately at the narrowest point of the ski (PIII). In other words, the narrow point of the ski corresponds roughly, within 5 millimeters, to the point where the curvature is smallest, and where the sidecut is closest to a straight profile.
The invention will be well understood, and its advantages and various other characteristics will become apparent, in the light of the following description of a few non-limiting exemplary embodiments, with reference to the appended schematic drawings, in which:
Of course, the illustrations provided in the figures are schematic only, and certain proportions may differ from reality, for the sake of a better understanding of the invention.
For greater clarity, we define an Oxyz reference frame and xy, yx, and xz planes defined by the non-collinear x, y, and z vectors of the Oxyz reference frame. For greater simplicity, it will be considered that the forward direction corresponds to the longitudinal direction of the ski along the Ox axis, oriented from the waist towards the tip.
Generally speaking, a ski has dimensional parameters defined in accordance with ISO 62 89.
Thus, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
Additionally, and as illustrated in
The ski also has a minimum width in the waist zone, at point PIII.
In some cases, the Applicant has found that a particular behavior can be observed when the ski width at the PB point of the ski, at the rear contact line, near the tail zone, is greater than the ski width at the PA point of the ski, at the front contact line, near the tip zone. More specifically, this difference in width (LPB−LPA) can be between 2 to 10 millimeters and leads to a snow behavior that favors ski pivoting and is more tolerant of terrain imperfections.
As shown in
The Applicant has observed the advantage of a configuration in which the zone of minimum width PIII is located further forward than the mid-shoe line MC. In particular, this difference can be greater than 2 mm, or even greater than 5 mm, and preferably between 5 and 15 mm.
This parameter facilitates ski entry into the curve at the start of a turn.
The skis according to the invention have a particular geometry, especially with regard to the radius of curvature RC of the sidecut. In practice, this radius of curvature can be measured from the variation in the width of the ski, measured in the longitudinal direction Ox. Thus, from a ski width profile reading along the Ox axis, it is possible to calculate the curvature, and the radius of curvature (which is the inverse of the curvature) to produce a curve as shown in
In accordance with the invention, the radius of curvature has a specific variation so that it has a maximum value RMAX located close to, or even coincident with, the point of least width PIII. The value of the maximum radius of curvature is particularly high, greater than 35 m, or even 50 m, preferably between 50 and 80 m. In particular, this maximum value can be used to adjust the ski's degree of grip.
In addition thereto, and as illustrated in
It can be seen in
In addition thereto, the evolution of the radius of curvature is also specific to skis conforming to the invention, since as can be seen in
The geometry of the skis according to the invention is particularly advantageous for its performance qualities on snow while remaining easy. More precisely, these skis offer an ease of entry into turns, a distribution of the support pressure across the entire length of the ski which allows avoiding points of over-gripping. Such skis have a narrower tip, which is easier to handle because it doesn't produce accidental gripping at the front.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2207412 | Jul 2022 | FR | national |