Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 based ceramic

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention pertains to an aluminum oxide (Al.sub.2 O.sub.3) based ceramic which has great strength and toughness, and exhibits excellent performance when used in cutting tools under severe conditions.
2. Prior Art
Japanese Patent Application laid open with Publication No. 53-118410 describes a conventional Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 based ceramic which is manufactured by the following method. First, Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 powder, powders of metal oxides and powders of hard dispersed phase constituents are prepared as starting powders. The metal oxides serving as the binder phase constituents are selected from those of yttrium (Y), magnesium (Mg), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni) and rare earth elements (abbreviated to R), while the hard dispersed phase constituents are carbides (MC), nitrides (MN), carbo-nitrides (MCN), oxy-carbides (MCO), oxy-nitrides (MNO), oxy-carbo-nitrides (MCNO) of the metals (M) of the Group IVa of the Periodic Table (hereinafter referred to as M(CNO)). No more than 10% by weight of one or more metal oxide powders, 10 to 90% by weight of one or more M(CNO) powders, and balance Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, are blended and compacted into a green compact under conventional conditions. Thereafter, the compact is subjected to hot pressing at a temperature of 1580.degree. C., a pressure of 30 atm, and a holding time of 10 to 30 minutes. The resulting ceramic has a composition substantially equal to the blending composition of the powders, and the metal oxide forms the binder phase thereof while Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 and M(CNO) define the hard dispersed phase.
The aforesaid Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ceramic is, however, insufficient for use in cutting tools. More specifically, as the demands for labor saving, higher performance and higher speed operation increase in various industrial fields, the conditions under which the cutting tools are put to use are also becoming severe. Thus, cutting tools are now required to have greater strength and toughness. However, the aforesaid Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ceramic, as well as the other kinds of ceramics, are susceptible to fracture or chipping due to insufficient strength and toughness when used under severe conditions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ceramic which exhibits excellent strength and toughness, so that it is specifically suitable for use in cutting tools for use under severe cutting conditions.
According to the present invention, there is provided an Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 based ceramic essentially consisting of:
5% to 50% by weight of a hard dispersed phase composed of at least one compound which is selected from the group consisting of metal carbide, metal nitride, metal carbo-nitride, metal oxy-carbide, metal oxy-nitride and metal carbo-oxy-nitride, and is represented by M(CNO), wherein M is at least one metal selected from the group consisting of Ti, Zr and Hf;
optionally 1% to 25% by weight of ZrO.sub.2 ; and
balance Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 matrix containing an additive dissolved in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains so as to form solid solution therewith, the additive being contained in an amount of 0.01% to 12% by weight with respect to the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 matrix and being composed of at least one oxide of an element selected from the group consisting of Y, Mg, Cr, Ni, Co, and rare earth elements;
the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains having an average grain size of no greater than 1.0 .mu.m while the hard phase constituent has an average grain size of no greater than 0.6 .mu.m.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
After an extensive study over the improvement of the conventional Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 based ceramic, the inventors have successfully obtained a novel Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 based ceramic which has excellent strength and toughness. More specifically, the inventors prepared Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 powder of an average particle size of no greater than 0.6 .mu.m, metal oxide powders (additives) of an average particle size of no greater than 1 .mu.m, and powders of hard dispersed phase constituents having an average particle size of no greater than 0.5 .mu.m. The hard phase constituents were one or more compounds selected from the group consisting of metal carbide, metal nitride, metal carbo-nitride, metal oxy-carbide, metal oxy-nitride, metal carbo-oxy-nitride and their solid solutions, and represented by M(CNO), wherein M is a metal selected from the metals of the Group IVa of the Periodic Table, i.e., Ti, Zr and Hf. The metal oxides were those of a metal selected from the group consisting of Y, Mg, Cr, Ni, Co and rare earth elements (R). These starting powders were blended and mixed into the following composition:
Metal oxide powder: 0.01% to 10% by weight with respect to Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 powder
M(CNO) powder: 5% to 50% by weight with respect to the total amount
Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 powder: remainder
Then, the mixture was compacted into a green compact under the conventional conditions, and was sintered by holding it at a temperature of 1,680.degree. C. to 1,830.degree. C. in an argon atmosphere or an atmosphere of a mixture of argon and inert gasses at 0.8 to 5 atm for 10 to 40 minutes. With this high-temperature, brief sintering, it was confirmed that in the resulting Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ceramic, the metal oxide was substantially dissolved in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 matrix to form solid solution therewith, and M(CNO) was dispersed in the matrix.
The Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ceramic thus obtained was further heat-treated at a temperature of 1,300.degree. C. to 1,450.degree. C. for 2 to 10 hours by holding it in an argon atmosphere or an atmosphere of a mixture of argon and inert gasses at 100 to 2,000 atm. This heat treatment may be carried out following the sintering operation, or separately from the sintering. With this heat treatment, there was obtained a sintered ceramic with a very fine structure where the average grain size of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 was no greater than 1 .mu.m while that of M(CNO) was no greater than 0.6 .mu.m, and the resulting ceramic exhibited great strength and toughness as compared with those of the prior art.
Thus, the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 based ceramic in accordance with the present invention is characterized in that it essentially consists of 5% to 50% by weight of a hard phase constituent of at least one compound represented by M(CNO), wherein M is at least one metal of Ti, Zr and Hf; and balance Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 matrix containing an additive dissolved in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains so as to form solid solution therewith, the additive being contained in an amount of 0.01% to 10% by weight with respect to the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 matrix and being composed of at least one oxide of Y, Mg, Cr, Ni, Co or rare earth elements. In addition, the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains have an average grain size of no greater than 1.0 .mu.m while the hard phase constituent has an average grain size of no greater than 0.6 .mu.m.
The Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ceramic in accordance with the invention has a very fine structure where the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains and M(CNO) grains are both very fine. In addition, the metal oxides are dissolved in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains so as to form solid solution therewith. Therefore, the ceramic of the invention exhibits superior strength and toughness, so that it can be suitably used in cutting tools which are used under severe circumstances.
In addition, when the M(CNO) of the hard dispersed phase is especially metal carbo-nitride or metal carbo-oxy-nitride represented by M(C.sub.x N.sub.y O.sub.z), wherein 0.95.ltoreq.x+y+z.ltoreq.1, 5/95.ltoreq.x/y.ltoreq.70/30 and 0.ltoreq.z.ltoreq.0.1, the sintered material possesses particularly fine structure and exhibits further enhanced strength and toughness.
With respect to the atomic ratios x, y and z in the M(C.sub.x N.sub.y O.sub.z), if the ratios fall out of the range as specified above, the desired characteristics cannot be obtained. More specifically, if a hard phase constituent powder having the ratio x/y exceeding 70/30 is used, sintering operation becomes difficult, so that the sintering must be carried out at a higher temperature in order to ensure a sufficient degree of sintering. However, when the sintering temperature is elevated, the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains grow excessively to the size of about 3 to 5 .mu.m. On the other hand, if the powder to be used has the ratio x/y of less than 5/95, M(C.sub.x N.sub.y O.sub.z) itself is subjected to an excessive grain growth, so that the hardness of the hard dispersed phase is unduly reduced, resulting in the ceramic of low strength. In addition, the atomic ratio z of oxygen in the M(C.sub.x N.sub.y O.sub.z) is determined so as to satisfy the relationship of 0.ltoreq.z.ltoreq.0.1. However, if the ratio exceeds 0.1, the grain growth of M(C.sub.x N.sub.y O.sub.z) becomes excessive although the higher degree of sintering is attained. Therefore, the atomic ratio z is preferably determined so as to be no greater than 0.1.
Furthermore, in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ceramic of the invention, the M(CNO) grains may exist not only at the grain boundaries of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains but also within Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains, and the M(CNO) grains existing in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains substantially enhance strength and toughness of the ceramic. In this regard, it is preferable that the M(CNO) grains exist within the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains at least in an amount of 10% by weight with respect to the hard dispersed phase, and those within the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains has an average grain size of no greater than 0.3 .mu.m.
In addition, in the above Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ceramic, due to the above specific structure, a great residual compressive stress is exerted on the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains. Thus, it is preferable that a residual compressive stress of no less than 20 MPa be exerted on the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains.
Furthermore, the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ceramic of the invention has a three-point bending strength of at least 100 kg/mm.sup.2. Therefore, even when cutting tools formed of the ceramic of the invention are used in either wet-type interrupted cutting of hardened steel and the like or dry-type continuous cutting of high-speed steel and the like, the cutting tools exhibit superior cutting performance. Accordingly, the ceramic of the invention can be suitably used in cutting tools which are used under severe circumstances.
The reasons for the numerical restrictions in the resulting ceramic will now be described in conjunction with the procedures.
(a) Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 :
If the average grain size of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 exceeds 1 .mu.m, the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains abruptly grow in such a manner as to take in the M(CNO), so that their average grain size becomes unduly large, resulting in a lowering of the strength of the ceramic. Therefore, the average grain size of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 is determined so as to be no greater than 1 .mu.m.
In this regard, in order to ensure the formation of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains of the above grain size, the average particle size of the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 powder should be no greater than 0.6 .mu.m.
Furthermore, although not restricted in the above, it is preferable that the content of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 in the ceramic be set to no less than 50% by weight in order to obtain a ceramic having sufficient heat resistance.
(b) M(CNO):
M(CNO) is caused to be dispersed at the grain boundaries of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 to enhance the wear resistance of ceramic, and is partly caused to be dissolved in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains to improve the strength and toughness of the ceramic.
If the M(CNO) content is less than 5% by weight, the above advantages cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if its content in the ceramic exceeds 50% by weight, the degree of sintering is reduced, so that the strength of the ceramic is unduly lowered. Therefore, the M(CNO) content in the ceramic is determined so as to range from 5% to 50% by weight. In order to ensure this range, the blending composition of the M(CNO) powder is also set to the range of between 5% and 50% by weight.
Furthermore, if the average grain size of M(CNO) exceeds 0.6 .mu.m, the interface at which the adjacent M(CNO) grains contact each other is increased. As a result, the resulting hard dispersed phase comes to have grains of greater sizes than expected, so that the strength and toughness of the ceramic is reduced. Accordingly, the average grain size of the hard phase constituent is determined to be no greater than 0.6 .mu.m. In this regard, in order to ensure the above grain size of M(CNO) grains, it is preferable that the average particle size of the M(CNO) powder be no greater than 1.0 .mu.m. Furthermore, in the case where the M(CNO) of the hard dispersed phase is carbo-nitride or carbo-oxy-nitride represented by M(C.sub.x N.sub.y O.sub.z), wherein 0.95.ltoreq.x+y+z.ltoreq.1, 5/95.ltoreq.x/y.ltoreq.70/30 and 0.ltoreq.z.ltoreq.0.1, degree of sintering is further improved, and grain growth during the sintering is less, so that the above fine structure may be obtained more easily.
Moreover, as described above, it is preferable that the M(CNO) grains exist within the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains at least in an amount of 10% by weight with respect to the hard dispersed phase, and those within the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains have an average grain size of no greater than 0.3 .mu.m. In order to produce the ceramic of this structure, the M(CNO) powder including at least 10% of fine powder of an particle size no greater than 0.3 .mu.m should be used. This fine powder may be prepared by introducing M(CNO) powder of an average particle size of 0.7 to 2 .mu.m in an attrition mill together with WC-based cemented carbide balls of 1 to 3 mm in diameter, and carrying out crushing for 10 to 100 hours.
(c) Metal oxides:
The metal oxides are dissolved in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 to form solid solution therewith during the sintering operation to enhance the degree of sintering, so that the strength of the resulting ceramic is increased. In addition, the metal oxides facilitate the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains to grow so as to take in fine M(CNO) grains of no greater than 0.3 .mu.m. However, if the content is set to less than 0.01% by weight with respect to Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, the above effects cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if the content exceeds 10% by weight, it remains at the grain boundaries of the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains, so that the hardness and strength at high temperature are particularly reduced. In this regard, the blending composition of the metal oxide powders should be also determined equal to the above range.
Furthermore, in order to cause the grains to be dissolved in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 more easily, it is preferable that the particle size of the metal oxide powder to be blended be no greater than 1 .mu.m.
(d) Internal stress:
In some examples of the ceramic of the invention, it has been confirmed that the residual stress exerted on the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains is comparatively great. This is due to the difference in expansion coefficients between the M(CNO) and the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 matrix. For example, if only TiC is added, which has an expansion coefficient less than the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, a comparatively small stress is exerted on the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 in the resulting sintered material. However, when M(C.sub.x N.sub.y O.sub.z), wherein 0.95.ltoreq.x+y+z.ltoreq.1, 5/95.ltoreq.x/y.ltoreq.70/30 and 0.ltoreq.z.ltoreq.0.1, is added, the residual compressive stress exerted on the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains becomes great. In view of the properties of the ceramic, it is preferable that a residual compressive stress exerted on the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains exceeds 20 MPa.
Next, the restrictions on the conditions for the manufacturing process will be explained.
In the procedures, the sintering is carried out by holding the mixture in an argon atmosphere or an atmosphere of a mixture or argon and inert gasses at 0.8 to 5 atm at a temperature of 1,680.degree. C. to 1,830.degree. C., for 10 to 40 minutes. With this high-temperature, brief sintering, the metal oxides are dissolved in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 matrix to form solid solution therewith. However, if the pressure, temperature and holding time are less than 0.8 atm, 1,680.degree. C., and 10 minutes, respectively, sufficient sintering cannot be carried out, so that the metal oxides do not sufficiently dissolve in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 matrix. On the other hand, if the pressure exceeds 5 atm, gas generated during the sintering operation remains in the ceramic, so that fine sintered material cannot be obtained. In addition, if the temperature exceeds 1,830.degree. C., the material powders are subjected to decomposition, so that the sintering is further adversely affected due to the gas produced by this decomposition. Furthermore, if the holding time exceeds 40 minutes, minute grains of no more than 0.3 .mu.m among the M(CNO) grains are subjected to grain growth, so that the movement of the M(CNO) grains into the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 matrix at the subsequent step is insufficient.
Furthermore, in the procedures, the sintered Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 ceramic is further heat-treated at a temperature of 1,300.degree. to 1,450.degree. C. for 2 to 10 hours by holding it in an argon atmosphere or an atmosphere of a mixture of argon and inert gasses at 100 to 2,000 atm. With this heat treatment, the pores in the structure are reduced to obtain a ceramic of generally true density, and the grain growth of the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains is promoted. In addition, among the M(CNO) existing at the grain boundaries of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains, those which have an average grain size of no greater than 0.3 .mu.m are taken in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 matrix. Therefore, the strength and toughness of the resulting ceramic are improved. However, if the pressure in the atmosphere is less than 100 atm, the removal of the pores is insufficient. If the temperature is less than 1,300.degree. C., the grain growth of the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 is extremely slow. In addition, if the holding time is shorter than 2 hours, the amount of the M(CNO) taken in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains is insufficient. On the other hand, even if the pressure is set to above 2,000 atm, no further advantages can be obtained. If the temperature exceeds 1,450.degree. C., the grain growth of M(CNO) occurs as the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains grow, so that the content of M(CNO) dispersed in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 becomes unduly reduced. Furthermore, even if the holding time is increased above 10 hours, it results only in increased manufacturing costs.
In the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 based ceramic as described above, the metal oxides are dissolved in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3. However, some of them may remain at the grain boundaries of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 in the form of compounds with Al.sub.2 O.sub.3. This compounds serve to further enhance the strength and toughness of the ceramic.
More specifically, Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 powder, metal oxide powders, and powders of hard dispersed phase constituents were blended and mixed in the following composition:
Metal oxide powder: 1% to 12% by weight with respect to Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 powder
M(CNO) powder: 5% to 50% by weight with respect to the total amount
Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 powder: remainder
Then, the mixture was compacted and sintered in the same conditions as previously described, and further subjected to the heat treatment under the same conditions. With these procedures, the ceramic in which the compounds of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 and the metal oxides (excluding Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3) are formed and remain at the grain boundaries of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains is formed. The M(CNO) is dispersed both at the grain boundaries of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains and within the grains at a specific ratio as described previously.
In the modified ceramic as described above, it is preferable that the content of the compounds of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 and metal oxides range from 0.5% to 10% by weight. If the content is less than 0.5% by weight, the aforesaid effects cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if the content exceeds 10% by weight, the hardness and wear resistance are reduced.
Furthermore, the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 based ceramic of the invention may be further modified using zirconium oxide (ZrO.sub.2). More particularly, ZrO.sub.2 powder having an average particle size of 0.5 .mu.m is prepared, and blended with the other powders in the following composition:
Metal oxide powder: 0.01% to 10% by weight with respect to Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 powder
ZrO.sub.2 : 1% to 25% by weight with respect to the total amount
M(CNO) powder: 5% to 45% by weight with respect to the total amount
Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 powder: remainder
Then, the mixture was compacted into a green compact under the conventional conditions, and was sintered by holding it in a non-oxidizing atmosphere at a temperature of 1,600.degree. C. to 1,800.degree. C. for a prescribed period of time, and the sintered material was further heat-treated at a temperature of 1,400.degree. C. to 1,800.degree. C. for a prescribed period of time by holding it in an inert atmosphere at 500 to 2000 atm.
The Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 based ceramic thus produced essentially consists of a matrix of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 in which one or more of the metal oxides are dissolved so as to form solid solution therewith; M(CNO) in an amount of 5% to 45% by weight (with respect to the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 matrix), and ZrO.sub.2 in an amount of 1% to 25% by weight in which one or more of the metal oxides are dissolved so as to form solid solution therewith. In addition, the ZrO.sub.2 dissolved in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains has an average grain size of no greater than 0.2 .mu.m, while the M(CNO) has an average grain size of no greater than 0.3 .mu.m.
In the foregoing, ZrO.sub.2 partly exists at the grain boundaries of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains, and these grains are subjected to phase transformation from a tetragonal system to a monoclinic system to thereby impart residual compresive stress to the surface of the ceramic. Therefore, the ceramic is less susceptible to fracture or chipping when used as cutting tools. In addition, ZrO.sub.2 is partly dissolved in the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains during the heat treatment to thereby impart a desired residual stress to the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains. However, if ZrO.sub.2 content in the ceramic is less than 1% by weight, desired effect cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if the content exceeds 25% by weight, the resistance to thermal shock is deteriorated. Therefore, the ZrO.sub.2 content in the ceramic is determined so as to range from 1% to 25% by weight. In this respect, the blending composition for the ZrO.sub.2 powder should also be determined so as to range from 1% to 25% by weight.
Moreover, as a further modified ceramic in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a ceramic with a hard coating. The hard coating may be effected by introducing the ceramic substrate obtained as described above into a physical vapor deposition apparatus of the activation reaction type using an electron beam, as disclosed in Japanese patent Application laid open with Publication No. 63-26356. The coating operation is carried out by controlling the deposition rate so as to be slow. The rate of the conventional depositing process is usually 2 .mu.m (in thickness) per hour, but in the invention, the vapor deposition is carried out, for example, at a rate of 0.1 to 0.6 .mu.m per hour. One or more layers of at least one composition, selected from the group consisting of carbide, nitride and carbo-nitride of titanium and Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, are formed on the substrate under these conditions. The hard coating thus formed is very fine, and when the average grain size is reduced to no larger than 300 Angstroms, the bonding strength of the hard coating with respect to the substrate is greatly increased. Therefore, the resulting ceramic is less susceptible to fracture or chipping even when used under severe conditions, and exhibits superior antifracture characteristics over a long period of time.
Furthermore, the most preferable ceramic substrate to be coated is the one that has the following composition:
TiCN: 20% to 50% by weight
Metal oxide: 0.01% to 10% by weight with respect to Al.sub.2 O.sub.3
Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 : remainder
The average thickness of the hard coating should range from 0.3 to 20 .mu.m in order to ensure adequate properties, while the average grain size of the coating should range from 150 to 300 Angstroms.
In the foregoing, TiCN serves to enhance the thermal shock resistance and to enhance the bonding strength between the substrate and the hard coating. However, if TiCN content is less than 20% by weight, the above advantages cannot be obtained. Therefore, the TiCN content is determined so as to range from 20 to 50% by weight. In addition, it is further preferable that TiCN have atomic ratios satisfying 5/95.ltoreq.C/N.ltoreq.70/30.
In addition, the average grain size of the coating should range from 150 to 300 Angstroms. If it exceeds 300 Angstroms, antifracture characteristics are sharply reduced, so that the ceramic is susceptible to fracture or chipping under severe cutting conditions. Therefore, the finer the grains, the better the antifracture characteristics. However, if the average grain size is less than 150 Angstroms, the rate of formation of the coating layers is sharply reduced, resulting in high in cost. Therefore, the average grain size has been determined as specified above.
Furthermore, the average thickness of the hard coating should range from 0.3 to 20 .mu.m. If the thickness is less than 0.3 .mu.m, sufficient wear resistance cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if the thickness exceeds 20 .mu.m, the thermal shock resistance is reduced unduly.
The vapor deposition process to be used may be either physical vapor deposition or chemical vapor deposition, although the deposition rate has to be controlled as described above.
As described above, the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 based ceramic in accordance with the present invention has great strength and toughness. Accordingly, when employed in cutting tools for use under conditions where the above characteristics are required, the ceramics of the invention exhibit excellent performance for an extremely long period of time. Therefore, although high-speed operation demands are increasing in the field of cutting tools, the cutting tools of the ceramics of the invention can successfully meet these demands.

The present invention will now be described in more detail by way of the following examples.
EXAMPLE 1
There were prepared starting powders of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, M(CNO) and metal oxides, each having a prescribed average particle size as shown in Tables 1-1a and 1-2a. These powders were blended in various blending compositions as set forth in Tables 1-1a and 1-2a, and were subjected to wet mixing in a ball mill for a period of 72 hours. After being dried, the mixtures were pressed under a pressure of 1 ton/cm.sup.2 into green compacts having a size of 30 mm.times.30 mm.times.10 mm, and into green compacts having a shape of a cutting insert in conformity with SNGN120408 of the ISO standards. Subsequently, these green compacts were subjected to high-temperature, short-time sintering and the heat treatments under the conditions as set forth in Tables 1-1b and 1-2b, to produce ceramics 1 to 15 of the invention.
Furthermore, for comparison purposes, green compacts having the compositions as set forth in Table 1-2a were prepared using powders shown in Table 1-2a, and were subjected to hot pressing under the conditions of Table 1-2b instead of being subjected to the high-temperature short-time sintering and heat treatments. Thus, comparative ceramics 1 to 5 were manufactured.
As to the various ceramics thus obtained, their compositions, theoretical density ratios, Rockwell hardnesses (A scale) and transverse rupture strengths were measured. In addition, fracture toughnesses were also measured by the indentation method.
Subsequently, the ceramics thus obtained were subjected to wet-type interrupted cutting tests of hardened steel under the following conditions:
Workpiece: hollow square bar of hardened steel (JIS.SUJ2; Hardness: H.sub.R C61)
Cutting speed: 200 meters/minute
Depth of cut: 0.3 mm
Feed rate: 0.2 mm/revolution
In this test, the time required until the cutting edge was subjected to chipping was measured. The results are set forth in Table 2.
As will be clearly seen from Table 2, the ceramics 1 to 15 of the invention had theoretical density ratios of no less than 99% and had less micropore formation, so that the ceramics are very fine. Therefore, as compared with the comparative ceramics 1 to 5, the ceramics 1 to 15 of the invention exhibited excellent strength and toughness, and high strength as well.
The measurement of bending strength in the experiments including the subsequent examples was conducted according to a testing method of Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) 1601. More specifically, three-point bending strength was calculated based on the following formula:
.sigma..sub.f =(3PL)/(2bh.sup.2)
where P=load (kgf) at fracturing; L=span (mm) between lower fulcrums; b=width (mm) of test piece; and h=height (mm) of the test piece. In the test, h, b, and L are set to 3 mm, 4 mm, and 30 mm, respectively. Additionally, the cross-head speed was set to 0.5 mm/min.
EXAMPLE 2
There were prepared starting powders of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, M(CNO) and metal oxides, each having a prescribed average particle size as shown in Tables 3-1a and 3-2a. These powders were blended in various blending compositions as set forth in Tables 3-1a and 3-2a, and were subjected to wet mixing in a ball mill for a period of 72 hours. After being dried, the mixtures were pressed under a pressure of 1 ton/cm.sup.2 into green compacts having a size of 30 mm.times.30 mm.times.10 mm, and green compacts having a diameter of 120 mm and a width of 60 mm. Subsequently, these green compacts were subjected to high-temperature and short-time sintering and the heat treatments under the conditions as set forth in Tables 3-1b and 3-2b, to produce ceramics 16 to 30 of the invention.
Furthermore, for comparison purposes, green compacts having the compositions as set forth in Table 3-2a were prepared using powders shown in Table 3-2a, and were subjected to hot pressing under the conditions of Table 3-2b instead of being subjected to the high-temperature and short-time sintering and heat treatments. Thus, comparative ceramics 6 to 10 were manufactured.
As to the various ceramics thus obtained, their compositions, theoretical density ratios, Rockwell hardnesses (A scale) and transverse rupture strengths were measured. In addition, fracture toughnesses were also measured by the indentation method.
Furthermore, an L-shaped bore having a length of 30 mm was formed through the disk-shaped ceramics 120 mm in diameter by using an electric discharge machine. Then, using the resulting ceramics as dies, warm extrusion operation of aluminum was carried out under the following conditions:
Workpiece: pure aluminum (heating temperature: 480.degree. C.)
Extrusion speed: 20 meters/minute
Measurements were taken of the extrusion time elapsed before the dies cracked and service life was terminated. The results are set forth in Table 4.
As will be clearly seen from the results of Table 4, the ceramics 16 to 30 of the invention had theoretical density ratios of no less than 99% and had less micropore formation, so that they were very fine. As compared with the comparative ceramics 16 to 30, the ceramics 16 to 30 of the invention exhibited excellent strength and toughness, and high strength as well.
EXAMPLE 3
There were prepared starting powders of Al.sub.2 O.sub.3, M(CNO), ZrO.sub.2 and other metal oxides, each having a prescribed average particle size as shown in Table 5-1. These powders were blended in various blending compositions as set forth in Table 5-1, and were subjected to wet mixing in an attrition mill for a period of 30 hours. After being dried, the mixtures were pressed under a pressure of 1 ton/cm.sup.2 into green compacts each having a size of 30 mm.times.30 mm.times.10 mm, and green compacts each having a shape of a cutting insert, in conformity with SNGN120408 of the ISO standards. Subsequently, these green compacts were subjected to sintering and heat treatments under the conditions as set forth in Table 5-2, to produce ceramics 31 to 43 of the invention.
Furthermore, for comparison purposes, green compacts having the compositions as set forth in Table 5-1 were prepared using powders shown in Table 5-1, and were subjected to hot pressing under the conditions of Table 5-2 instead of being subjected to the sintering and heat treatments. Thus, comparative ceramics of 11 to 13 were manufactured.
As to the various ceramics thus obtained, their compositions, theoretical density ratios, and Rockwell hardnesses (A scale) were measured. In addition, in order to evaluate strength and toughness, bending strength at three-points and fracture toughness using the indentation method were also measured.
Subsequently, the ceramics thus obtained were subjected to dry-type continuous cutting tests of high speed steel under the following conditions:
Workpiece: high speed steel (SKD-11)
Cutting speed: 100 meters/minute
Depth of cut: 1 mm
Feed rate: 0.13 mm/revolution
In this test, the length of time it took until the flank wear of the cutting edge reached 0.2 mm wide was measured. The results are set forth in Table 6.
As will be clearly seen from Table 6, the ceramics 31 to 43 of the invention has theoretical density ratios of no less than 99% and had less micropore formation, so that the ceramics of the invention are very fine. In addition, the ceramics have great strength due to the residual stress of the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains. Furthermore, ZrO.sub.2 existing at the grain boundaries of the Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grains enhances the toughness, so that the cutting edge is less susceptible to fracture or chipping, resulting in an increased tool life. Therefore, as compared with the comparative ceramics 11 to 13, the ceramics 31 to 43 of the invention exhibit excellent strength and toughness, and high strength as well.
EXAMPLE 4
There were prepared starting powders of TiCN (average particle size: 0.5 .mu.m), Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 (0.3 .mu.m), MgO (0.3 .mu.m), Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 (0.6 .mu.m) and ZrO.sub.2 (0.3 .mu.m). These powders were blended in various blending compositions as set forth in Tables 7-1a and 7-2a, and were subjected to wet mixing in an attrition mill for a period of 10 hours. After being dried, the mixtures were pressed into green compacts, which were then subjected to sintering high-temperature and short-time sintering and the heat treatments under the conditions similar to those in the previous examples, to produce the ceramic substrates which were of a shape of a cutting insert in conformity with SNGN 120408.
Subsequently, these substrates were introduced into a physical vapor deposition apparatus of the activation reaction type using an electron beam, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application laid open with Publication No. 63-26356. By controlling the deposition speed, the average grain size of the hard coating were varied, so that the hard coatings having compositions, average grain sizes, and average layer thicknesses, as set forth in Tables 7-1b and 7-2b, were formed.
Thereafter, the ceramics thus obtained (coated ceramics 1 to 10 of the invention and comparative coated ceramics 1 to 10) were subjected to wet-type interrupted cutting tests of hardened steel under the following conditions:
Workpiece: round bar of SNCM 439
Cutting speed: 350 meters/minute
Feed rate: 0.3 mm/revolution
Depth of cut: 1.5 mm
Cutting time: 20 minutes
Furthermore, the high-speed dry-type continuous cutting test was carried out under the following conditions:
Workpiece: round bar of SNCM 439 having four axial grooves disposed in longitudinally equally spaced relation to one another
Cutting speed: 250 meters/minute
Feed rate: 0.1 mm/revolution
Depth of cut: 1.0 mm
Cutting time: 15 minutes
In these tests, the flank wear and face wear of the cutting edge were measured, and the results are set forth in Table 8.
As will be clearly seen from Table 8, in the coated ceramics 1 to 10 of the invention, the average grain size of the hard coating ranged from 150 to 300 Angstroms. Since the hard coating is thus minute, the ceramics exhibited superior antifracture characteristics even in the severe cutting conditions such as high speed cutting or high feed cutting, and hence exhibits a prolonged tool life. In contrast, the comparative coated ceramics 1 to 10 were subjected to chipping during the cutting operation.
Obviously many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in the light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
TABLE 1-1a__________________________________________________________________________ Blending composition (% by weight) Metal oxides M(CNO) Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Average Average Percentage Average particle particle of powder particle size size no larger size (.mu.m) Composition (.mu.m) than 0.3 .mu.m Composition (.mu.m)__________________________________________________________________________Ceramics 1 0.03 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.3 0.8 15 TiC 30 0.3 remainderof the 2 0.8 MgO 1.0 1.5 10 TiN 30 0.6 remainderinvention 3 0.5 Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 2.0 0.5 25 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 0.3 remainder 4 1.0 Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.8 0.2 80 TiC.sub.0.43 N.sub.0.5 O.sub.0.07 50 0.05 remainder 5 0.8 CoO 0.3 0.5 25 (Ti, Zr)C 10 0.1 remainder 0.8 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.5 6 1.0 CeO.sub.2 2.0 0.6 15 TiC 20 0.1 remainder 0.6 15 HfC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 20 7 0.5 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.1 0.1 100 TiC.sub.0.3 O.sub.0.1 15 0.05 remainder 8 0.1 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.5 0.3 40 (Ti, Hf)O.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 20 0.3 remainder 0.1 MgO 1.0 9 0.2 MgO 0.5 0.5 30 (Zr, Hf)C.sub.0.4 N.sub.0.5 O.sub.0.1 25 0.3 remainder 0.2 CeO.sub.2 0.5 0.5 30 TiN.sub.0.8 O.sub.0.1 5 10 0.05 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.3 0.5 20 ZrC 20 0.1 remainder__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 1-1b__________________________________________________________________________ Sintering Heat treatment Composition Composition of Holding of Holding atmosphere Pressure Temperature time atmosphere Pressure Temperature time (%) (Atm) (.degree.C.) (min) (%) (Atm) (.degree.C.) (Hr)__________________________________________________________________________Ceramics 1 Ar: 100 1 1730 30 Ar: 100 1500 1400 5of the 2 Ar: 100 1 1780 30 Ar: 100 1500 1400 5invention 3 Ar: 90, 0.9 1800 30 Ar: 100 1500 1350 5 N.sub.2 : 10 4 Ar: 90, 0.9 1700 30 Ar: 100 1500 1350 5 N.sub.2 : 10 5 Ar: 100 1 1730 30 Ar: 100 1500 1450 8 6 Ar: 100 1 1730 30 Ar: 100 1500 1400 4 7 Ar: 100 0.95 1700 30 Ar: 100 1500 1400 2 8 Ar: 90, 1 1780 30 Ar: 90 1000 1400 4 He: 10 He: 10 9 Ar: 90 1 1780 30 Ar: 90 1000 1450 4 He: 10 He: 10 10 Ar: 95, 2 1800 10 Ar: 95 1000 1300 4 He: 5 He: 5__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 1-2a__________________________________________________________________________ Blending composition (% by weight) Metal oxides M(CNO) Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Average Average Percentage Average particle particle of powder particle size size no larger size (.mu.m) Composition (.mu.m) than 0.3 .mu.m Composition (.mu.m)__________________________________________________________________________Ceramics 11 0.5 Yb.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.3 0.2 70 (Zr, Hf)C.sub.0.4 N.sub.0.5 O.sub.0.1 10 0.3 remainderof the 12 0.4 NiO 0.2 0.5 25 ZrC.sub.0.3 N.sub.0.7 40 0.3 remainderinvention 0.4 Yb.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.5 13 0.5 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.05 0.5 5 ZrC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.45 O.sub.0.05 10 0.3 remainder 0.5 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.05 14 0.05 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.05 0.1 70 HfC.sub.0.7 N.sub.0.3 5 0.05 remainder 15 0.1 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.5 0.3 35 TiC.sub.0.1 N.sub.0.9 35 0.3 remainderPrior art 1 0.03 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 8 0.8 3 TiC 30 1.0 remainderceramics 2 0.8 MgO 3 1.0 1 TiN 10 1.0 remainder 3 1.0 NiO 5 0.8 3 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.45 O.sub.0.05 10 0.8 remainder 4 0.5 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 4 1.5 1 ZrC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 1.5 remainder 0.5 Yb.sub.2 O.sub.3 4 5 0.1 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 5 2.0 1 HfC 30 1.5 remainder__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 1-2b__________________________________________________________________________ Sintering or Hot pressing Heat treatment Composition Composition of Holding of Holding atmosphere Pressure Temperature time atmosphere Pressure Temperature time (%) (Atm) (.degree.C.) (min) (%) (Atm) (.degree.C.) (Hr)__________________________________________________________________________Ceramics 11 Ar: 95 5 1700 20 Ar: 95, 1000 1300 10of the He: 5 He: 5invention 12 Ar: 100 0.95 1780 40 Ar: 100 2000 1400 5 13 Ar: 100 0.8 1680 20 Ar: 100 2000 1350 8 14 Ar: 100 0.9 1680 40 Ar: 100 2000 1300 8 15 Ar: 100 1 1780 40 Ar: 100 2000 1450 2Prior art 1 N.sub.2 100 1580 30 -- -- -- --ceramics 2 Vacuum 0.5 1750 30 -- -- -- -- 3 N.sub.2 100 1600 30 -- -- -- -- 4 Ar 1 1600 30 -- -- -- -- 5 Ar 1 1600 30 -- -- -- --__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________Composition (% by weight)M(CNO) Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Theore-Average At Average Inter- tical Cuttinggrain grain grain nal density Hard- Bending Fracture time untilsize Within bound- Binder size stress ratio ness strength toughness chipping(.mu.m) grains ary phase Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 (.mu.m) (MPa) (%) (H.sub.R A) (kg/mm.sup.2) (MN/m.sup.3/2) (min)__________________________________________________________________________Ceramicsof theinvention 1 0.6 3 27 -- remainder 0.8 10* 99.8 94.5 136 5.2 4.0 2 0.6 2 28 -- remainder 0.9 13 99.5 94.0 122 5.0 3.0 3 0.5 4 26 -- remainder 0.9 90 99.8 94.3 128 5.2 3.0 4 0.4 20 30 -- remainder 0.6 60 99.6 94.6 122 6.0 4.3 5 0.5 2 8 -- remainder 0.8 14 99.9 93.7 130 5.0 3.0 6 0.6 4 36 -- remainder 0.9 8 99.8 94.4 122 5.0 3.0 7 0.4 13 2 -- remainder 0.5 7 99.8 93.8 132 5.8 3.5 8 0.4 6 14 -- remainder 0.6 120 99.9 94.0 138 5.4 4.0 9 0.6 6 24 -- remainder 0.8 30 99.6 94.3 130 5.6 3.510 0.6 3 17 -- remainder 0.9 20* 99.8 94.1 136 5.2 3.511 0.4 6 4 -- remainder 0.7 110 99.8 93.8 136 5.6 3.012 0.6 7 33 -- remainder 0.8 140 99.6 94.6 128 5.4 3.513 0.6 0 10 -- remainder 0.8 55 99.8 93.9 136 5.2 3.014 0.3 3 2 -- remainder 0.9 70 99.9 93.7 138 5.4 3.015 0.5 8 27 -- remainder 1.0 80 99.8 94.5 132 5.4 3.5Prior artceramics 1 0.9 -- 30 4 remainder 3.2 6 99.7 94.2 92 3.0 0.2 2 1.6 -- 10 2 remainder 2.8 18 99.2 92.9 78 3.4 0.1 3 0.8 -- 10 3 remainder 1.8 30 99.8 93.3 84 3.2 0.1 4 1.5 -- 30 4 remainder 3.5 25 99.8 93.5 82 3.0 0.2 5 1.9 -- 30 2 remainder 3.1 15* 99.7 93.9 78 3.0 0.2__________________________________________________________________________ *indicates tensile stress.
TABLE 3-1a__________________________________________________________________________ Blending composition (% by weight) Metal oxides M(CNO) Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Average Average Percentage Average particle particle of powder particle size size no larger size (.mu.m) Composition (.mu.m) than 0.3 .mu.m Composition (.mu.m)__________________________________________________________________________Ceramics 16 0.03 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 1 0.6 15 TiC 30 0.05 remainderof the 17 0.5 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 6 0.5 25 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 50 0.3 remainderinvention 18 0.2 MgO 3 0.2 80 TiC.sub.0.45 N.sub.0.5 O.sub.0.05 30 0.1 remainder 19 1.5 MgO 5 0.5 20 ZrC 20 0.6 remainder 20 1.0 Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3 5 0.5 25 (Ti, Zr)C 10 0.6 remainder 21 1.0 CeO.sub.2 3 0.1 100 TiC.sub.0.8 O.sub.0.2 5 0.6 remainder 22 0.5 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 3 0.3 40 (Zr, Hf)C.sub.0.3 N.sub.0.7 10 0.3 remainder 23 0.05 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 3 0.5 20 (Zr, Hf)C 30 0.1 remainder 24 0.5 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 5 0.5 30 (Ti, Zr)C.sub.0.7 N.sub.0.3 30 0.3 remainder 25 0.5 Yb.sub.2 O.sub.3 5 0.4 40 (Ti, Zr)C.sub.0.4 N.sub.0.5 O.sub.0.1 30 0.3 remainder__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 3-1b__________________________________________________________________________ Sintering Heat treatment Composition Composition of Holding of Holding atmosphere Pressure Temperature time atmosphere Pressure Temperature time (%) (Atm) (.degree.C.) (min) (%) (Atm) (.degree.C.) (Hr)__________________________________________________________________________Ceramics 16 Ar: 100 1 1730 30 Ar: 100 1500 1300 5of the 17 Ar: 100 1 1800 40 Ar: 100 1500 1350 5invention 18 Ar: 100 1 1730 30 Ar: 100 1500 1350 5 19 Ar: 100 0.9 1750 15 Ar: 100 1500 1400 5 20 Ar: 100 0.9 1730 15 Ar: 100 1000 1400 8 21 Ar: 100 0.9 1700 30 Ar: 100 1000 1400 2 22 Ar: 90, 4 1750 10 Ar: 90, 1500 1350 8 He: 10 He: 10 23 Ar: 90, 2 1730 30 Ar: 90, 2000 1350 8 He: 10 He: 10 24 Ar: 100 1 1780 30 Ar: 100 1000 1350 5 25 Ar: 100 0.9 1780 30 Ar: 100 1000 1350 5__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 3-2a__________________________________________________________________________ Blending composition (% by weight) Metal oxides M(CNO) Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Average Average Percentage Average particle particle of powder particle size size no larger size (.mu.m) Composition (.mu.m) than 0.3 .mu.m Composition (.mu.m)__________________________________________________________________________Ceramics 26 0.03 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 3 0.4 30 ZrC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 0.3 remainderof the 1.0 NiO 2invention 27 1.0 Nd.sub.2 O.sub.3 3 0.4 25 (Zr, Hf)C.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 0.3 remainder 1.0 CoO 2 28 0.03 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 3 0.2 80 TiC.sub.0.3 N.sub.0.7 30 0.3 remainder 0.2 MgO 3 29 0.2 MgO 3 0.5 20 ZrC 30 0.3 remainder 1.0 CeO.sub.2 5 30 0.05 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 3 0.1 100 TiC.sub.0.9 O.sub.0.1 30 0.3 remainder 1.0 Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 3Prior art 6 0.03 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 15 0.8 2 TiC 30 1.0 remainderceramics 7 1.5 MgO 15 1.0 1 TiN 10 1.0 remainder 8 0.5 La.sub.2 O.sub.3 15 0.8 2 TiC.sub.0.4 N.sub.0.4 O.sub.0.1 10 0.8 remainder 9 0.5 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 9 1.5 1 ZrC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 1.5 remainder 1.5 NiO 6 10 0.1 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 8 2.0 1 HfC 30 1.5 remainder 1.5 Cr.sub.2 O.sub.3 7__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 3-2b__________________________________________________________________________ Sintering or Hot pressing Heat treatment Composition Composition of Holding of Holding atmosphere Pressure Temperature time atmosphere Pressure Temperature time (%) (Atm) (.degree.C.) (min) (%) (Atm) (.degree.C.) (Hr)__________________________________________________________________________Ceramics 26 Ar: 100 1 1730 20 Ar: 100 1500 1350 8of the 27 Ar: 100 1 1780 30 Ar: 100 1500 1350 8invention 28 Ar: 100 1 1730 20 Ar: 100 1500 1300 5 29 Ar: 100 1 1780 30 Ar: 100 1500 1350 8 30 Ar: 100 1 1750 20 Ar: 100 1500 1300 8Prior art 6 N.sub.2 100 Torr 1580 30 -- -- -- --ceramics 7 Vacuum 0.5 Torr 1750 30 -- -- -- -- 8 N.sub.2 100 Torr 1600 30 -- -- -- -- 9 Ar 1 1600 30 -- -- -- -- 10 Ar 1 1600 30 -- -- -- --__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________Composition (% by weight)M(CNO) Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 Theore-Average At Average Inter- tical Cuttinggrain grain grain nal density Hard- Bending Fracture time untilsize Within bound- Com- size stress ratio ness strength toughness chipping(.mu.m) grains ary pounds Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 (.mu.m) (MPa) (%) (H.sub.R A) (kg/mm.sup.2) (MN/m.sup.3/2) (min)__________________________________________________________________________Ceramicsof theinvention16 0.6 26.0 4.0 0.5 remainder 0.8 3 99.8 93.9 145 6.2 1617 0.6 39.8 10.2 10 remainder 0.9 96 99.9 93.6 142 6.0 818 0.4 8.5 21.5 3.5 remainder 0.7 54 99.7 93.7 146 6.4 1619 0.6 17.0 3.0 8 remainder 0.9 1 99.6 93.4 144 6.4 1620 0.6 9.8 0.2 5 remainder 0.8 13* 99.8 93.7 140 6.2 821 0.4 2.0 3.0 0.5 remainder 0.9 4 99.8 93.9 142 6.2 1222 0.4 6.5 3.5 2 remainder 0.6 130 99.9 93.6 142 6.0 823 0.6 25.5 4.5 1.5 remainder 0.6 17 99.9 94.0 140 6.2 1224 0.6 22.6 7.6 4 remainder 0.7 108 99.8 93.6 143 6.0 1225 0.6 20.2 9.8 5 remainder 0.8 75 99.8 93.5 144 6.2 1226 0.5 23.6 6.4 4 remainder 0.7 47 99.7 93.7 142 6.2 827 0.5 24.3 5.7 6 remainder 0.7 67 99.7 93.4 142 6.0 828 0.3 10.5 19.5 5 remainder 0.5 170 99.7 93.6 146 6.4 1629 0.6 26.4 3.6 7 remainder 0.8 8 99.8 93.4 140 5.4 830 0.4 5.5 24.5 1 remainder 0.9 25 99.9 93.8 146 6.2 16Prior artceramics 6 1.1 -- 30 6** remainder 2.1 21* 99.8 93.2 82 3.2 2 7 1.6 -- 10 8** remainder 2.5 7 99.7 93.1 78 3.0 2 8 1.3 -- 10 6** remainder 1.7 40 99.7 93.2 84 3.4 4 9 1.8 -- 30 5** remainder 2.7 35 99.8 93.2 70 3.0 210 2.5 -- 30 8** remainder 2.4 16* 99.8 93.4 72 3.0 2__________________________________________________________________________ *indicates tensile stress. **indicates binder phase.
TABLE 5-1__________________________________________________________________________Blending composition (% by weight)M(CNO) ZrO.sub.2 Metal oxides Al.sub.2 O.sub.3Average Percentage Average Percentage Average Averageparticle of fine particle of fine particle particlesize powder size powder size Compo- size(.mu.m) (wt %) Composition (.mu.m) (wt %) (.mu.m) sition (.mu.m)__________________________________________________________________________Ceramicsof theinvention31 0.5 15 TiC.sub.0.7 N.sub.0.3 5 0.4 30 10 0.5 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.4 0.6 remainder32 0.6 12 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 0.3 40 10 0.6 Dy.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.4 0.4 remainder33 0.4 20 TiC.sub.0.3 N.sub.0.7 45 0.5 20 1 0.6 Sm.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.4 0.6 remainder34 0.5 15 ZrC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 20 0.3 30 25 0.4 Yb.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.5 0.3 remainder35 0.3 20 TiN 30 0.4 30 10 0.4 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.3 0.4 remainder36 0.5 20 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.4.O.sub.0.1 30 0.4 30 10 0.4 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.3 0.3 remainder37 0.3 20 TiC 30 0.4 30 10 0.1 MgO 0.5 0.4 remainder38 0.5 20 ZrC.sub.0.7 N.sub.0.2.O.sub.0.1 25 0.4 30 10 0.1 CaO 0.5 0.3 remainder 0.5 20 HfC.sub.0.7 N.sub.0.2.O.sub.0.1 539 0.5 20 TiC.sub.0.7 N.sub.0.3 15 0.4 30 10 0.4 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.5 0.4 remainder 0.5 10 ZrC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 1540 0.5 20 HfC 30 0.4 30 10 0.1 MgO 0.2 0.4 remainder 0.4 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.341 0.6 10 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 10 0.4 30 10 0.5 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.2 0.4 remainder42 0.6 15 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 15 0.4 30 5 0.5 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.3 0.4 remainder43 0.6 15 TiC.sub.0.7 N.sub.0.3 22 0.4 30 5 0.5 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 0.3 0.4 remainderPrior artceramics11 1.2 3 TiN 30 -- -- -- 0.4 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 3 0.4 remainder12 1.5 2 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 -- -- -- 0.1 MgO 3 0.4 remainder13 1.5 2 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.4.O.sub.0.1 30 -- -- -- 0.3 CaO 3 0.4 remainder__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 5-2__________________________________________________________________________ Conditions of sintering or hot pressing Conditions of heat treatment Composition Composition of Holding of Holding atmosphere Pressure Temperature time atmosphere Pressure Temperature time (vol %) (Atm) (.degree.C.) (Hr) (vol %) (Atm) (.degree.C.) (Hr)__________________________________________________________________________Ceramics 31 Ar: 100 0.5 1600 3 Ar: 100 500 1400 10of the 32 Ar: 100 1 1700 3 Ar: 100 1000 1600 5invention 33 Ar: 100 1 1800 3 Ar: 100 1500 1800 3 34 Ar: 90, 1 1700 5 Ar: 100 1000 1500 3 He: 10 35 N.sub.2 : 100 1 1750 2 Ar: 100 2000 1600 3 36 Ar: 100 2 1750 3 Ar: 100 1000 1600 5 37 Ar: 100 1 1750 3 Ar: 100 1000 1800 3 38 Ar: 100 0.8 1750 2 Ar: 100 1500 1700 3 39 Ar: 100 1 1750 3 Ar: 100 1000 1600 3 40 Ar: 100 1 1750 3 Ar: 100 2000 1600 3 41 Ar: 100 1 1800 3 Ar: 100 1000 1600 5 42 Ar: 100 1 1800 3 Ar: 100 1000 1650 3 43 Ar: 100 1 1750 3 Ar: 100 1000 1650 3Prior art 11 Ar: 100 1 1700 3 -- -- -- --ceramics 12 Ar: 100 1 1750 3 -- -- -- -- 13 Ar: 100 1 1750 3 -- -- -- --__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________ Composition (% by weight) M(CNO) Average ZrO.sub.2 Metal oxides Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 grain Within At grain At grain at grain Average Internal size grains (.mu.m) boundary Within grains boundary boundary Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 size (.mu.m) stress__________________________________________________________________________ (MPa)Ceramics 31 0.6 0.5 4.5 2 8 -- remainder 0.9 95of the 32 0.6 1 29 3 7 -- remainder 0.8 63invention 33 0.6 8 32 0.1 0.9 -- remainder 0.9 72 34 0.6 1 19 6 19 -- remainder 0.6 108 35 0.5 5 25 3 7 -- remainder 0.8 34 36 0.5 0.5 29.5 2 8 -- remainder 0.8 82 37 0.4 3 27 2 8 -- remainder 0.9 13 38 0.6 2 28 2 8 -- remainder 0.9 105 39 0.6 4 26 2 8 -- remainder 0.9 87 40 0.6 3 27 2 8 -- remainder 0.7 3 41 0.6 1 9 1 9 -- remainder 1.0 35 42 0.6 1 14 1 4 -- remainder 1.0 54 43 0.6 2 20 1 4 -- remainder 1.0 62Prior art 11 1.3 -- 30 -- -- 4 remainder 1.6 4ceramics 12 1.8 -- 30 -- -- 3 remainder 2.3 18 13 1.7 -- 30 -- -- 4 remainder 2.0 3__________________________________________________________________________ Theoretical Bending density Hardness strength Cutting ratio (%) (H.sub.R A) (kg/mm.sup.2) FT time__________________________________________________________________________ (min) Ceramics 31 99.8 93.6 112 6.1 18 of the 32 99.7 94.2 138 6.4 24 invention 33 99.6 94.3 130 5.8 20 34 99.7 94.0 112 6.0 16 35 99.9 94.2 126 6.2 24 36 99.8 94.1 132 6.3 20 37 99.9 94.2 135 6.4 19 38 99.7 94.0 126 6.4 23 39 99.6 94.2 130 6.2 21 40 99.7 94.1 125 6.0 20 41 99.9 93.4 100 6.2 15 42 99.8 93.8 104 6.1 17 43 99.9 94.1 109 6.0 18 Prior art 11 99.7 94.0 82 5.0 2.sup.(1) ceramics 12 99.9 94.1 90 5.2 3.sup.(2) 13 99.8 93.9 88 5.1 2.sup.(3)__________________________________________________________________________ FT denotes "Fracture toughness .sup.(1), (3) chipped in 2 minutes .sup.(2) fractured in 3 minutes
TABLE 7-1a______________________________________Coatedceramicsof the Blending Composition of substrateinvention TiCN MgO ZrO.sub.2 Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3______________________________________1 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 20 0.5 -- -- remainder2 ToC.sub.0.7 N.sub.0.3 30 0.5 -- -- remainder3 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 -- -- 0.5 remainder4 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 -- -- 0.5 remainder5 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 -- -- 0.5 remainder6 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 0.5 2 -- remainder7 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 -- -- 0.5 remainder8 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 0.5 -- 0.5 remainder9 TiC.sub.0.3 N.sub.0.7 30 0.5 -- 0.5 remainder10 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 0.5 -- 0.5 remainder______________________________________
TABLE 7-1b__________________________________________________________________________Hard coating1st layer 2nd layer 3rd layer 4th layer Average Average Average AverageCoated layer Average layer Average layer Average layer Averageceramics thick- grain thick- grain thick- grain thick- grainof the Compo- ness size Compo- ness size Compo- ness size Compo- ness sizeinvention sition (.mu.m) (.ANG.) sition (.mu.m) (.ANG.) sition (.mu.m) (.ANG.) sition (.mu.m) (.ANG.)__________________________________________________________________________1 TiCN 0.5 200 TiN 1.5 200 -- -- -- -- -- --2 TiCN 0.5 200 TiN 1.5 200 -- -- -- -- -- --3 TiN 2.0 300 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --4 TiC 2.0 200 TiCN 1.0 200 TiN 2.0 250 -- -- --5 TiN 0.5 200 TiC 1.5 200 TiCN 1.5 200 TiN 1.5 2006 TiC 1.0 200 TiCN 2.0 200 TiN 3.0 200 -- -- --7 TiC 5.0 150 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --8 TiCN 2.0 150 TiC 2.0 150 -- -- -- -- -- --9 TiCN 3.0 150 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --10 TiCN 1.0 200 TiN 2.0 200 -- -- -- -- -- --__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 7-2a______________________________________Compar-ativecoated Blending composition of substrateceramics TiCN MgO Y.sub.2 O.sub.3 Al.sub.2 O.sub.3______________________________________1 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 0.5 -- remainder2 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 0.5 -- remainder3 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 0.5 -- remainder4 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 0.5 -- remainder5 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 0.5 -- remainder6 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 -- 0.5 remainder7 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 -- 0.5 remainder8 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 -- 0.5 remainder9 TiC.sub.0.5 N.sub.0.5 30 -- 0.5 remainder10 TiC.sub.0.3 N.sub.0.7 40 0.5 0.5 remainder______________________________________
TABLE 7-2b__________________________________________________________________________Hard coating1st layer 2nd layer 3rd layer 4th layer Average Average Average AverageCompar- layer Average layer Average layer Average layer Averageative thick- grain thick- grain thick- grain thick- graincoated Compo- ness size Compo- ness size Compo- ness size Compo- ness sizeceramics sition (.mu.m) (.ANG.) sition (.mu.m) (.ANG.) sition (.mu.m) (.ANG.) sition (.mu.m) (.ANG.)__________________________________________________________________________1 TiCN 0.5 400 TiN 1.5 400 -- -- -- -- -- --2 TiCN 0.5 450 TiN 1.5 450 -- -- -- -- -- --3 TiN 2.0 500 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --4 TiC 2.0 400 TiCN 1.0 400 TiN 2.0 400 -- -- --5 TiN 0.5 400 TiC 1.5 400 TiCN 2.5 400 TiN 1.5 4506 TiC 1.0 500 TiCN 2.0 400 TiN 3.0 500 -- -- --7 TiC 5.0 400 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --8 TiCN 2.0 500 TiC 2.0 500 -- -- -- -- -- --9 TiCN 3.0 500 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --10 TiCN 1.0 400 TiN 2.0 400 -- -- -- -- -- --__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 8______________________________________ Interrupted cutting tests Continuous cutting tests Flank wear Face wear Flank wear Face wear width (mm) depth (.mu.m) width (mm) depth (.mu.m)______________________________________Coated 1 0.23 52 0.26 60ceramics 2 0.20 49 0.28 56of the 3 0.21 50 0.24 54invention 4 0.18 41 0.21 45 5 0.19 43 0.21 48 6 0.18 40 0.20 44 7 0.20 45 0.21 49 8 0.24 54 0.25 60 9 0.22 56 0.26 62 10 0.23 55 0.26 59Com- 1 chipped in 12 minutes chipped in 7 minutesparative 2 chipped in 11 minutes chipped in 8 minutescoated 3 chipped in 13 minutes chipped in 7 minutesceramics 4 chipped in 12 minutes chipped in 6 minutes 5 chipped in 11 minutes chipped in 8 minutes 6 chipped in 11 minutes chipped in 9 minutes 7 chipped in 13 minutes chipped in 8 minutes 8 chipped in 9 minutes chipped in 8 minutes 9 chipped in 10 minutes chipped in 7 minutes 10 chipped in 13 minutes chipped in 7 minutes______________________________________

Number	Date	Country
2-42979	Feb 1990	JPX
2-90783	Apr 1990	JPX
2-234125	Sep 1990	JPX
2-321463	Nov 1990	JPX

Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 based ceramic

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (4)

CROSS REFERENCE TO A RELATED APPLICATION

US Referenced Citations (1)

Continuation in Parts (1)