1. Field of the Invention
The invention generally relates to a containment housing having an alternate inlet field and a method for leak testing a filter installed in the containment housing have an alternate inlet field. The invention also relates to an air distribution plate.
2. Description of the Related Art
Isolation dampers 114 are located upstream and downstream of the containment housing 102 and the test sections 110, 112. The dampers 114 allow the containment system 100 to be sealed air-tight during system decontamination. Transitions 120 are disposed between the isolation dampers 114 and the other components of the containment system 100 to improve airflow. The dampers 114 may be bolted or welded to the transitions 120. Additional ductwork 122 may be disposed between the dampers 114 and the transitions 120.
The upstream section 110 is for the introduction of an aerosol challenge upstream of the filter components 104, 106 and for the measurement of upstream challenge concentration. Conventional upstream sections typically include baffles to achieve adequate aerosol mixing such that testing may be performed to ANSI, IEST or other standard. In addition to the pre-filter 104, the containment housing 102 may hold one or more intermediate filters, HEPA filters, HEGA filters and/or other filtration components required for the specific application. It is contemplated that the main filter 106 may be a panel filter, v-bank filter or other type of filter configuration.
The downstream test section 112 is used to conduct scan testing and validation of the HEPA filter(s) to determine the location and size of any leaks in the filter(s). A bag with gloves (not shown) is generally coupled to an access door flange (not shown) of the downstream test section and utilized to position the scanning mechanism 108 during testing of a filter disposed in the containment housing 102.
This configuration for a conventional containment system is very large, typically in the range of about 130 inches in length, and requires significant space and cost for installation. Often times the size of the conventional containment system does not allow for alternate inlets and outlets which could be utilized for testing filters installed in the containment system to be incorporated into the design of the containment system. Therefore, in addition to the containment system, all wetted areas, including laboratory and upstream and downstream ductwork must be taken offline and completely decontaminated prior to introducing an aerosol challenge. As containment systems are relied upon in labs testing the most toxic and virulent chemicals, agents, viruses and organisms, the down time associated with taking the containment system offline is extremely costly. Thus, there is a need for an improved containment system that has alternate inlets and outlets to more efficiently test the filters in the containment system.
Embodiments of the invention generally provide a containment system having a primary air inlet and an alternate inlet. In one embodiment, a containment system includes a housing for holding an air filter, the housing having an access door configured to access an interior of the housing, wherein the access door has an alternate airflow inlet formed therethrough. The access door with the alternate inlet may be provided as a retrofit kit for existing containment systems.
In another embodiment, a method for testing a filter disposed in a containment system includes closing a damper disposed upstream of a containment housing, flowing air into the containment housing through an alternate inlet formed through an access door of the containment housing and across an air distribution plate to a filter disposed in the containment housing, and testing the filter by sampling the air flowing through the filter.
In yet another embodiment, an air distribution plate is provided that includes a front surface having a first edge and an opposing second edge. The front surface is configured to allow air to pass therethrough, wherein a flow resistance through the front surface is greater proximate the second edge relative the first edge.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, schematically illustrate the present invention, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures. It is contemplated that elements of one embodiment may be beneficially incorporated in other embodiments.
The present invention includes an alternate inlet to allow testing of filters installed in a containment system while a primary air inlet of the containment housing is closed. The alternate inlet may be formed in an access door for a containment system. An access door with an alternate inlet may be provided as a retrofit kit for existing containment systems. The invention also includes an air distribution plate that corrects asymmetrical air velocity and/or aerosol concentrations utilized to test filters in the containment systems.
Referring to
In one embodiment, the turning vane 268 extends through pre-filter access door and the filter access port 204 into the housing 102 and is utilized to redirect airflow into the housing 102. In one embodiment, the turning vane 268 is generally coupled to the door body 260 or the collar 264. In one embodiment, the turning vane 268 is positioned to extend away from the collar 264 and towards a centerline of the collar 264. The turning vane 268 has an orientation that is disposed at a non-zero angle to the centerline of the collar 264. In another embodiment, the turning vane 268 is flat or curved, or any other shape suitable for redirecting airflow.
The main filter 106 is disposed in the housing 102 in a position separating an upstream section 218 from a downstream section 216. In one embodiment, the main filter holder 280 separates the upstream section 218 from the downstream section 216. The main filter 106 is accessible from the outside of the housing 102 through a filter access port 206 that is sealed by a main filter access door 234. The main filter 106 may be a HEPA filter or any other suitable filter for use in a containment system 100. It is contemplated that the main filter 106 may be a panel filter, v-bank filter or other type of filter configuration. The main filter access door 234 may be opened to replace the main filter 106 disposed in the housing 102 and closed to sealingly isolate the interior of the housing 102 from the surrounding environment. A scanning mechanism 236 may be disposed in the downstream section 216 of the housing 102 to facilitate testing of filters in the containment system by the use of a probe 238 connected to test equipment 212. Mixing vanes 248 may also be disposed in the downstream section 216 of the housing 102 to facilitate testing of the main filter 106 in the containment system 200 by use of one or more downstream sample ports 246 connected to the test equipment 212. The test equipment 212 may be a photometer, particle counter, or other suitable filter testing device. The test equipment 212 may also be coupled to an upstream sample port 208 to facilitate determining the concentration of the aerosol used to challenge the main filter 106. The probe 238 is generally configured to allow isokinetic sampling at a predefined filter test velocity. It is contemplated that the scanning mechanism 236 may include a plurality of probes 238. In one embodiment, the scanning mechanism 236 is automatic and scans filters in the containment housing without opening the housing 102. In one embodiment, the scanning mechanism 236 is configured to, but not limited to, facilitate leak and/or efficiency testing.
Isolation dampers 114 (shown in a closed position) are located upstream and downstream of the housing 102 and the upstream and downstream sections 218, 216. The isolation dampers 114 allow the containment system 200 to be sealed air-tight at the primary air inlet 124 and the primary air outlet 126 of the containment system 200 during system decontamination. In one embodiment, the isolation dampers are bubble-tight dampers. Transitions 120 and 210 are disposed between the isolation dampers 114 and the other components of the containment system 200. The dampers 114 may be bolted or welded to the transitions 120, 210. Optionally, as seen in
Referring to
In operation, the upstream damper 114 is actuated to a closed position that provides an air-tight seal so no air flows through the primary air inlet 124. An aerosol challenge is provided to the containment system 200 through the ductwork 324 and alternate inlet 222 or through the housing 102 of the upstream section 218. Air flows from the alternate inlet 222 into the unfiltered air plenum 202 into and through the air distribution plate 300 to the main filter 106. In one embodiment, the air flowing through the alternate inlet 222 is redirected by the turning vane 268 from a direction axially aligned with the centerline of the collar 264 to a direction 15 to 90 degrees from the centerline of the collar 264, for example to a direction more parallel to the normal direction of flow through the housing 102. In another embodiment, the turning vane 268 is configured to direct air flowing through the alternate inlet 222 towards the inlet 124 of the housing 102 to allow the air to more evenly mix in the unfiltered air plenum 202 before passing through the housing 102 towards the downstream section 216. The aerosol laden air is filtered by the main filter 106 and flows into the downstream section 216. In one embodiment, the test equipment 212, such as an aerosol photometer, samples the aerosol laden air in the upstream section 218 at a location upstream of the main filter 106 to determine the concentration of aerosol challenging the main filter 106. The scanning mechanism 236 provides samples of the air passing through the main filter 106 to the test equipment 212 to enable testing of the main filter 106 for pin-hole leaks. In another embodiment, an efficiency test may performed by sampling air passing through the main filter 106, wherein the filtered air is mixed by the mixing vanes 248 in the downstream section 216. The downstream sample port 246 provides samples of the air passing through the main filter 106 and mixing through the mixing vanes 248 to the test equipment 212 to enable testing of the main filter 106 for single point sampling or for overall efficiency testing by a sample array. The filtered air exits the housing 102 through the downstream transition 210 and through an alternate outlet 240. In one embodiment, the alternate inlet 222 and the alternate outlet 240 may be connected to recycle the filtered air. In another embodiment, the downstream damper 114 may be in an open position and alternate outlet 240 sealed by a cap 228 so that air exiting the housing 102 is exhausted through the primary outlet 126.
The air distribution plate 300 is permeable to air and is utilized to provide uniform velocity to the main filter 106 and/or provide uniform distribution of aerosol concentration to the main filter 106. In embodiments where the velocity and/or aerosol concentration has a gradient or non-uniform distribution across the housing 102 upstream of the main filter 106, the air distribution plate 300 may be configured to have a profile of airflow resistance through the plate 300 that is selected to compensate for the upstream asymmetries, gradients and/or non-uniform distributions so that the velocity and/or aerosol concentration of the flow downstream of the air distribution plate 300 and challenging the main filter 106 has a uniformity within tolerance to produce acceptable testing results. The permeability of the air distribution plate 300 may be achieved via perforations, slots, apertures or other openings formed through the plate 300, and/or material covering the plate, such as a mesh or other air permeable material. The variation of airflow resistance across the air distribution plate 300 may be achieved by varying the open area through the plate 300, varying the airflow resistance of the individual passages formed through the plate 300, or by other suitable manners.
Referring back to
Without the air distribution plate 300, the air exiting from the alternate inlet 222 into the unfiltered air plenum 202 of the housing 102 tends to flow at a lower velocity and lower pressure near the alternate inlet 222, and the air tends to flow at a higher velocity and higher pressure as the air travels farther away from the alternate inlet 222 into the housing 102 due to the misalignment between the flow axis of the housing 102 and the directed flow axis of the air exiting the alternate inlet 222, shown here as 90 degrees offset. As such, the uneven air distribution flowing through the main filter 106 in the upstream section 218 may result in erroneous or inaccurate test results when testing the filter in the downstream section 216. For example, tests results may indicate a false leak in the main filter 106 at a location away from the alternate inlet 222, because at a high velocity, particulates are more likely to penetrate the main filter 106. Conversely, test results may erroneously miss a leak in the main filter 106 at a location near the alternate inlet 222, because at low velocities particulates the main filter 106 will exhibit higher effective efficiency and trap more particulates.
The air distribution plate 300 advantageously remedies the above problem by compensating for non-uniform upstream air flows to create a uniform face velocity at the upstream surface of the main filter 106. The air distribution plate 300 uses a gradient of flow resistance between the near and far edges 408, 410 to cause the flow passing through the plate 300 to have a uniform velocity profile. Air traveling at a high velocity faces greater resistance through apertures 416 passing at the far edge 410 and less resistance passing through apertures 414 at the near edge 408. The different diameters of apertures 414 and 416 create an open area gradient, which advantageously forces the air to exit the air distribution plate 300 more uniformly. Thus, when the air reaches the main filter 106 in the upstream section, the air has a uniform distribution of velocity for accurate testing. The gradient across the air distribution plate 300 may also be utilized to mix and/or make uniform the distribution of aerosol concentration in the upstream flow.
Test results indicate that the containment system of the present invention provides a uniform concentration of aerosol at various locations proximate the main filter 106. For example, six sample ports located within one inch of the main filter 106 were tested for average concentration (micrograms/liter) of aerosol, and the standard deviation was less than one. Test results also indicate that the containment system 200 of the present invention provides uniform flow velocity through the main filter 106. For example, air flow was set by measuring the pressure differentials across the main filter 106 before placing the air distribution plate 300 or 600 in the housing 102. Once the air was flown through the air distribution plate 300 or 600, velocity readings were taken at six sample ports located downstream of the main filter 106. The readings indicated that relative standard deviation was less than 0.20.
Thus, a containment system having an alternate inlet is provided that has a substantial reduction in overall cost and downtime as compared to conventional containment systems. Furthermore, an air distribution plate providing uniform face velocity across a filter to provide uniform filtration performance is provided.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/691,068 filed Aug. 20, 2012, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4619136 | Ortiz | Oct 1986 | A |
5833528 | Baum et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
7008465 | Graham et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7210363 | Morse et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7517386 | Morse | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7635296 | Gagnon et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7758664 | Morse | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7998252 | Huza | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8043395 | Braithwaite | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8221681 | Devine | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20040047776 | Thomsen | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050000681 | Gagnon et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060042359 | Morse et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060112757 | Morse | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060272301 | Morse | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070237670 | Snyder | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256399 | Yang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090056547 | Huza | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090126382 | Rubino | May 2009 | A1 |
20110044853 | Devine | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120006202 | Morse et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130152518 | Korenev | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8708814 | Aug 1987 | DE |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated, Jan. 22, 2014, for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US13/55684. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated, Feb. 24, 2015, for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US13/55684, consists of 10 pages. |
European Search Report from European Patent Application No. 13831807.6 dated Mar. 22, 2016 (9 pgs.). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140053634 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61691068 | Aug 2012 | US |