The present disclosure relates to hydraulic pumps circuits. More particularly, it relates to alternating flow hydraulic pumps useful, for example, in multi-actuator hydraulic circuits.
Hydraulics is used for the generation, control, and transmission of power by the use of pressurized liquids. Alternating flow hydraulics (AFH), can be characterized by the transmission of power with no netflow. AFH is the hydraulic analog of alternating current electrical systems, transmits power through waves in liquids, solids and gases. AF fluid power can be classified as an alternating flow or standing wave. In alternating flow, a periodically varying flow source, with no net fluid flow, is used to transmit power. In a standing wave system, the forcing frequency and pipe wavelength are tuned such that reflections at the end of a pipe form standing pressure waves.
Hydraulic machinery uses hydraulic circuits in which hydraulic fluid is pushed, under pressure, through hydraulic pumps, pipes, tubes, hydraulic motors, hydraulic cylinder, etc. to generate power, for example, to move heavy loads. Multi-actuator hydraulic circuits can be included in various hydraulic machinery, from legged robots to excavators. Multi-actuator hydraulic circuits conventionally use metering valves, or proportioning valves, for independent control of each actuator. The majority of existing hydraulic circuits use metering valves to control the fluid flow and pressure to an output line. Metering valves can provide fast and precise control, however, using metering valves can be highly inefficient due to the reliance of dissipating power across a partially open valve. Metering valves throttle the fluid flow to dissipate power as a means of controlling delivered power. Controlling the fluid flow by reducing, or throttling, the fluid flow with metering valves can result in energy loss from the energy that was used to generate the flow and pressure of the fluid to the metering valve. The throttling energy loss associated with valve control is largely the reason that the average efficiency of mobile hydraulic systems is 21%.
A variable displacement pump can be an efficient alternative to using metering valves, in order to control flow to each actuator (i.e., displacement control). Types of variable positive displacement pumps include axial piston pumps, bent axis pumps, vane pumps, linkage pumps, and radial piston pumps. Other types, of variable displacement pumps are also available. In many applications, the variable displacement pumps operate at low displacement for a large portion of the cycle, resulting in significant energy loss. The efficiency of conventional variable displacement pumps can be poor at low volumetric displacements because the largest energy losses are not of equal scale to the output power. Additionally, the variable displacement pumps typically have three times the mass and volume of a fixed displacement gear pump of the same displacement. The most efficient architecture, the bent axis, does not have a through shaft, preventing stacked mounting on a common shaft that can be driven by a prime mover. The next most efficient architecture, the axial piston, has an aspect ratio (i.e., proportional relationship between width and height) that is long axially, resulting in a long packaging space for multiple common-shaft mounted pumps. The radial piston pump can operate at very high pressures and has a very efficient architecture of a mechanical connection from a shaft out to driving pistons within the radial piston pump with very low friction. The radial piston pump can be generally pancake shaped such that the radial piston pump is radially large but axial short. In this manner, multiple pumps can be stacked and directly coupled to an engine to create a multi-actuator circuit. For multi-actuator circuits, it is desirable that multiple pumps package well together to be driven on a common shaft to be driven by a common prime mover. The package size and weight of the pumps can also be important.
Utilizing a variable displacement pump to control each actuator can be an efficient alternative for multiple actuator systems. For example, an excavator employing displacement control with variable displacement pump/motors can have a 39% energy savings over throttling valve control in a load sensing circuit. The modularity of displacement control makes it more reliable than a single pump circuit having throttling valves in that if one component of the system fails, the other components can remain fully functional. Efficiency in displacement control in a hydraulic system can depend on the performance and efficiency of the variable displacement pump across a wide range of displacements and pressures.
An alternative to a mechanically variable displacement pump is to vary the flowrate of a fixed displacement pump through high-speed switching of digital valves, termed digital displacement. The most common approach to digital displacement is flow diverting, where the actively controlled tank valve is held open for a portion of the upstroke of the piston, returning the fluid to a tank. At a specified displacement fraction of the piston stroke, the tank valve is rapidly closed and the pressure valve is opened, sending flow to the load. While this approach eliminates the leakage and friction of port plates of an axial piston or bent axis pump, it has several drawbacks. First, the valve transitions occur at high piston velocity, resulting in throttling energy loss across the partially open tank and pressure valves for a non-negligible fraction of the piston stroke and generating a water hammer event that creates noise and large flow pulsations. Second, viscous flow losses are incurred by pumping the unused flow back to tank. Finally, there is a general lack of digital valves with reasonable energy consumption that can switch fast enough for high-speed pumps.
Variable displacement pumps can be useful to eliminating metering valve control through displacement control. Variable displacement pump architectures can be heavy, are axially long (thus making common-shaft mounting challenging), and have poor efficiency at low displacements. An efficient variable displacement pump with a form factor amenable to a common shaft is desirable. An AF variable pump assembly that is highly efficient, axially short (thus allowing multiple pumps to be mounted on a common shaft), and power dense is desirable.
In light of the above, a need exists for an improved hydraulic pump circuit capable of providing highly efficient control and performance in a compact form and useful, for example, in variable displacement pumps.
Some aspects of the present disclosure are directed toward a hydraulic pump assembly including a first pump, a second pump, a shaft, and fluid lines. The first pump includes a first set of piston assemblies. The second pump includes a second set of piston assemblies. Each piston assembly of the first and second pumps includes a cylinder and a piston slidably disposed in the cylinder. The shaft connects the first pump to the second pump and is configured to displace the pistons within the cylinders of the first and second sets of piston assemblies. The fluid lines fluidly couple the first piston assembly with the second piston assembly to form paired piston assemblies. The first set of piston assemblies is phase shifted from the second set of piston assemblies.
This disclosure includes an alternating flow (AF) hydraulic pump that varies the flowrate by phase shifting pairs of oscillating pistons. The AF pump assembly in accordance with this disclosure, in one example, can include connecting pairs of pistons of two radial piston pumps and phase shifting the case of one pump with respect to the other pump to vary the displacement. Other types and quantities of pumps are also acceptable in accordance with this disclosure.
One embodiment of an alternating-flow (AF) hydraulic pump assembly 10 in accordance with principles of the present disclosure is diagrammatically illustrated in
Each piston assembly is fluidly open to a respective inlet and outlet flow line through openings, or ports, in the casing 24. An inlet flow 30 is split into inlet flow lines 34, 35, 36, with associated valves to control flow into each of the piston assemblies 21a, 22a, 23a, respectively of the pump 20a. The valves can be passive (e.g., check valves) or active valves that allow the pumps to operate as a motor. A fluid source (not shown) can be fluidly connected to the inlet flow 30. Flow out of each respective piston assembly 21a, 22a, 23a proceeds to the respective paired piston assembly 21b, 22b, 23b of the pump 20b and then continues to an outlet flow 40 through one of flow lines 44, 45, 46. Flow from each flow line 44, 45, 46 can be controlled with a respective check valve into outlet flow 40. The two pumps 20a, 20b share a common crankshaft 26 for rotating a cam 28 of each pump 20a, 20b and a manifold (not shown) for combining the flow from piston assembly pairs 21a, 21b; 22a, 22b; 23a, 23b, respectively. The crankshaft 26 extends between each pump 20a, 20b to rotate the cams 28, or rotating block, around an axis of rotation in each pump 20a, 20b, respectively. The cams 28 are rotated around the axis of rotation with the plurality of piston radially reciprocally moving within corresponding cylinders and moving through a constant length stroke at each cylinder. In one embodiment, the cams 28 are eccentric, although other cam profiles are also acceptable. For example, the cams 28 can include multiple lobes with the lobes of the cam 28 contacting and activating a piston to slidably move in the cylinder as the shaft 26 rotates the cam 28 about an axis of rotation. The cam 128 can provide flexibility with a tunable displacement profile to adjust the displacement density and balance axle forces. Further, the pistons can be driven through a variety of other mechanical constraints, such as a crankshaft and connecting rod, swashplate, or other translating mechanism, for example.
With continued reference to
V
inst=2VTDC+Vpipe+Vlead+Vlag
V
lead
=A
pis
[r(1-cosθ)+L−√{square root over (L2-r2sin2θ)}]
V
lag
=A
pis
[r(1-cos(θ+ϕ))+L−√{square root over (L2-r2sin2(θ+ϕ))}]
where Vinst is the actual total volume of the pressure chamber, Vlead is the actual swept volume of the leading piston, Vlag is the actual swept volume of the lagging piston, Apis is the cross-sectional area of the pumping piston, r is the crankshaft eccentricity, L is the connecting rod length, and ϕ is the phase angle. The leading and lagging pistons are rigidly connected and rotatable at the same angular velocity, ω. An effective displacement is defined assuming the piston has ideal sinusoidal motion, which can be realized if L approaches infinity in the above equations. The difference in the waveforms is shown to be negligible for the connecting rod to crankshaft rations. With ideal sinusoidal motion the fractional displacement, X, (see, e.g.,
The total effective displacement per revolution of the pump can then be calculated as:
D=nsApisX
where n is the number of fluid chambers (each with two pistons) and s is the piston stroke.
In one example, multiple actuator displacement controlled system 200 includes a four-quadrant hydraulic pump assembly. Four-quadrant hydraulic pump assemblies can be highly efficient across the full range of displacements and is axially short (compact) is employed. In one example, disc style check valves are employed, for fast valve closing. Other types of valves that allow full four-quadrant pump/motor operation are also acceptable. Active valves can enable four-quadrant control, which allows energy regeneration for increased system efficiency. With four-quadrant operation, the input shaft can be loaded during pumping and absorbing regenerative energy during motoring. The regenerative energy can be transferred through the common shaft to pumps driving other degrees-of-freedom, reducing the load on the prime mover and hence further improving the system efficiency. The four-quadrant pump is an excellent fit in displacement control applications where the combination of high efficiency and energy regeneration capabilities will improve the overall hydraulic system efficiency. The modularity of the displacement control circuit can improve system reliability as a single component failure will not influence the other degrees-of-freedom. The four-quadrant hydraulic pump can enable efficient, high-bandwidth displacement control for multi-actuator displacement control systems.
In one example, the measured system pressure, flowrate, input torque, and shaft speed was used to measure the total efficiency of the pump, given as:
where Psys is the output system pressure of the pump, Qsys is the output flowrate from the pump, T is the average input torque, and ω is the average shaft speed. The total efficiency can also be considered as the product of the pump's mechanical efficiency, ηm, and volumetric efficiency, ηv. The mechanical efficiency characterizes the mechanical losses within the system such as piston-cylinder friction, bearing friction, any internal fluid friction, and in this case, friction from the sprocket-chain transmission. The mechanical efficiency is defined as:
where D is the total effective displacement per revolution which is given by D=nsApisX, as discussed above. The volumetric efficiency describes the amount of leakage and compressibility losses within the system, defined as:
The different phase angles were realized by disassembling the chain-and-sprocket transmission and rotating one of the sprockets on its associated crankshaft. The speed of the pump was managed by a hydraulic motor which was controlled by a flow control valve. To measure the crankshaft angle of each pump, a block with dowel pins was slid into a pair of the machined holes in the sprocket mounted to the crankshaft. The machined holes align with the keyway of the crankshaft at top dead center (TDC) of cylinder 1. A digital angle gauge was used to measure the angle of the leading crankshaft and the lagging crankshaft and the difference between the two was the phase shift. Pressure, flowrate, torque, and optical encoder sensors were all read with a PCIe-6353 National Instruments DAQ board on a desktop computer. A series of experiments were run at all discrete phase angles achievable with the chain and sprocket. Once the transmission was installed and the phase angle was measured, the pump was driven by a hydraulic motor controlled with a flow control valve. For each experiment, the speed of the pump and load were set simultaneously due to the load being an adjustable orifice. Once the speed and pressure were set, the data acquisition (DAQ) of acquired data was for 3 seconds at a rate of 10 kS/s.
The example pump operated smoothly across the full range of displacements, speeds, and pressures investigated. Pressure versus volume curves are also illustrated in
The pressure measured in the fluid chambers on either side of the connecting pipe are plotted versus time in
Two different pressure versus volume curves are illustrated in
The numerical model correlates well with the experimental results except for the higher phase angles where there is a small discrepancy. This is magnified in the volumetric efficiency plot, shown in
The volumetric, mechanical, and total efficiencies for the example and model are illustrated in
Although the present disclosure has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
This Non-Provisional Patent Application claims the benefit of the filing dates of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/415,827, filed Nov. 1, 2016, entitled “Alternating Flow Hydraulic Pump Circuit,” the entire teachings of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was made with government support under NSF-0540834 awarded by the National Science Foundation. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62415827 | Nov 2016 | US |