Aluminum alloy sheet for lithographic printing plate and method of producing the same

Abstract
An aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate which allows pits to be more uniformly formed by an electrochemical surface-roughening treatment and exhibits more excellent adhesion to a photosensitive film and water retention properties, and a method of producing the same are disclosed. The aluminum alloy sheet includes 0.1 to 1.5% of Mg, more than 0.05% and 0.5% or less of Zn, 0.1 to 0.6% of Fe, 0.03 to 0.15% of Si, 0.0001 to 0.10% of Cu, and 0.0001 to 0.05% of Ti, with the balance being aluminum and impurities, the Mg content and the Zn content satisfying a relationship “4×Zn %−1.4%≦Mg %≦4×Zn %+0.6%”, and the amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet being 0.1 to 3.0 mg/m2. It is more effective when precipitates with a diameter (circle equivalent diameter) of 0.1 to 1.0 μm are dispersed on the surface of the sheet in a number of 10,000 to 100,000 per square millimeter (mm2).
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to an aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate. More particularly, the present invention relates to an aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate which can be surface-roughened uniformly by an electrochemical etching treatment and exhibits excellent strength and thermal softening resistance, and a method of producing the same.


BACKGROUND ART

An aluminum alloy sheet is generally used as a support for a lithographic printing plate (including an offset printing plate). Such a support is surface-roughened from the viewpoint of improving adhesion to a photosensitive film and improving the water retention properties in a non-image area. As the surface roughening method, a mechanical surface roughening method such as ball graining, brush graining, or wire graining has been employed. In recent years, a method of roughening the surface of a support aluminum alloy sheet by an electrochemical etching treatment has been increasingly developed due to excellent plate-making applicability (fitness), excellent printing performance, and a continuous treatment capability using a coil material.


The electrochemical etching treatment is performed using hydrochloric acid or an electrolyte mainly containing hydrochloric acid (hereinafter referred to as “hydrochloric acid-based electrolyte”), or nitric acid or an electrolyte mainly containing nitric acid (hereinafter referred to as “nitric acid-based electrolyte”). An A1050 (aluminum purity: 99.5%) equivalent material which can be relatively uniformly surface-roughened by electrolysis is used as a support. It is possible to obtain hundreds of thousands of clear printed matters by appropriately selecting a photosensitive layer applied to the support.


In order to improve the plate wear of a printing plate, a printing plate using an aluminum alloy sheet as a support is subjected to exposure and development using a normal method, followed by a high-temperature heat treatment (burning treatment) to strengthen an image area. The burning treatment is generally performed at 200 to 290° C. for 3 to 9 minutes. An aluminum alloy sheet used as a support is required to exhibit heat resistance (burning resistance) which maintains the strength of the support during the burning treatment.


In recent years, the printing speed has increased along with the proceed in printing technology so that stress applied to a printing plate mechanically secured to each side of a plate cylinder of a printer has increased. Therefore, a support having a high strength has been desired. If the strength of the support is insufficient, the secured portion of the support may be deformed or damaged, whereby a printing variation or the like may occur. Accordingly, an increase in strength of the support is indispensable together with the burning resistance.


In order to satisfy such a demand, an aluminum alloy support of which the components are adjusted based on an A1050 equivalent material has been proposed (see JP-A-2005-15912, for example). An attempt has been made which adjusts the components based on an A1050 equivalent material and adjusts the depth of oil pits in the sheet surface in order to satisfy the above demand (JP-A-2004-35936).


DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

In order to further improve the above-mentioned aluminum alloy support, the inventors of the present invention have utilized an aluminum alloy support based on an A1050 equivalent material and conducted studies on the relationship between the surface properties of a cold-rolled sheet and etch pits obtained by the electrolytic surface-roughening treatment. As a result, the inventors have found that an aluminum powder remaining on the surface of the rolled sheet affects etch pit formation, and a uniform pit pattern is obtained by limiting the amount of aluminum powder.


The present invention has been achieved as a result of further experiments and studies based on the above findings. An object of the present invention is to provide an aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate which allows pits to be more uniformly formed by an electrochemical surface-roughening treatment, exhibits more excellent adhesion to a photosensitive film and water retention properties, and shows excellent thermal softening resistance (burning resistance), and a method of producing the same.


In order to achieve the above object, an aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate according to claim 1 comprises 0.1 to 1.5% of Mg, 0.5% or less of Zn, 0.1 to 0.6% of Fe, 0.03 to 0.15% of Si, 0.0001 to 0.1% of Cu, and 0.0001 to 0.1% of Ti, with the balance being aluminum and impurities, the amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet being 0.1 to 3.0 mg/m2.


An aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate according to claim 2 comprises 0.1 to 1.5% of Mg, more than 0.05% and 0.5% or less of Zn, 0.1 to 0.6% of Fe, 0.03 to 0.15% of Si, 0.0001 to 0.10% of Cu, and 0.0001 to 0.05% of Ti, with the balance being aluminum and impurities, the Mg content and the Zn content of the aluminum alloy sheet satisfying a relationship “4×Zn %−1.4%≦Mg %≦4×Zn %+0.6%”, and the amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet being 0.1 to 3.0 mg/m2.


In the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 2, precipitates with a diameter (circle equivalent diameter) of 0.1 to 1.0 μm are dispersed on the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet in a number of 10,000 to 100,000 per square millimeter (mm2).


In the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 2 or 3, the quantity of Fe in solid solution (the amount of Fe dissolved) in the aluminum alloy sheet is 20 to 100 ppm.


In the aluminum alloy sheet according to any one of claims 2 to 4, some or all of the elements of the aluminum alloy sheet form intermetallic compounds, the content of Fe which forms an intermetallic compound is 50 to 99.8% of the total Fe content, the content of Si which forms an intermetallic compound is 5 to 40% of the total Si content, and the ratio (B %/A %) of the content (B %) of Fe which forms an Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compound to the content (A %) of Fe which forms an Al—Fe intermetallic compound is 0.9 or less.


In the aluminum alloy sheet according to any one of claims 1 to 5, the number of oil pits with a diameter (circle equivalent diameter) of 30 μm or more formed in the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet is 50 or less per square millimeter (mm2).


The aluminum alloy sheet according to any one of claims 1 to 6 further comprises more than 0.05% and 0.3% or less of Mn.


In the aluminum alloy sheet according to any one of claims 1 to 7, the average grain size of the aluminum alloy sheet in a direction perpendicular to a rolling direction with respect to the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet is 100 μm or less, and the average grain size in a direction parallel to the rolling direction with respect to the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet is 2 to 20 times the average grain size in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction.


The aluminum alloy sheet according to any one of claims 1 to 8 further comprises one or more elements selected from Pb, In, Sn, and Ga in an amount of 0.005 to 0.05% in total.


The aluminum alloy sheet according to any one of claims 3 to 9 has a 0.2% proof stress of 120 MPa or more after being subjected to a heat treatment at 270° C. for seven minutes.


A method of producing an aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate according to claim 11 comprises casting an aluminum alloy having the composition according to any one of claims 2, 7, and 9 to obtain an ingot, scalping a rolling-side surface of the ingot by 3 to 15 mm, subjecting the ingot to a homogenization treatment which includes heating the ingot to 450 to 580° C. at a temperature increase rate of 20 to 60° C./hr and keeping the ingot at 450 to 580° C. for one hour or more, hot-rolling the resulting product to a thickness of 5 mm or less under conditions where the hot rolling start temperature is 400 to 520° C. and the hot rolling finish temperature is 320 to 400° C., and cold-rolling the hot-rolled product without subjecting the hot-rolled product to process annealing.


A method of producing an aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate according to claim 12 comprises casting an aluminum alloy having the composition according to any one of claims 2, 7, and 9 to obtain an ingot, scalping a rolling-side surface of the ingot by 3 to 15 mm, subjecting the ingot to a homogenization treatment which includes heating the ingot to 450 to 580° C. at a temperature increase rate of 20 to 60° C./hr and keeping the ingot at 450 to 580° C. for one hour or more, cooling the resulting product to room temperature, heating the cooled product to 350 to 500° C. and hot-rolling the product to a thickness of 5 mm or less under conditions where the hot rolling finish temperature is 300 to 380° C., and cold-rolling the hot-rolled product without subjecting the hot-rolled product to process annealing.


A method of producing an aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate according to claim 13 comprises casting an aluminum alloy having the composition according to any one of claims 2, 7, and 9 to obtain an ingot, scalping a rolling-side surface of the ingot by 3 to 15 mm, subjecting the ingot to a homogenization treatment which includes heating the ingot to 450 to 580° C. and keeping the ingot at 450 to 580° C. for three hours or more, cooling the resulting product subjected to the homogenization treatment to a hot rolling start temperature at a temperature decrease rate of 20 to 60° C./hr, hot-rolling the cooled product to a thickness of 5 mm or less under conditions where the hot rolling start temperature is 400 to 500° C. and the hot rolling finish temperature is 300 to 400° C., and cold-rolling the hot-rolled product without subjecting the hot-rolled product to process annealing.


A method of producing the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 14 is a method of producing the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 1 or 2, the method comprising subjecting the aluminum alloy sheet to final cold rolling using a rolling oil with a viscosity of 1 to 6 cSt.


A method of producing the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 15 is a method of producing the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 1 or 2, the method comprising subjecting the aluminum alloy sheet to final cold rolling using a rolling oil, the Mg content (Mg %) of the aluminum alloy sheet and the viscosity p of the rolling oil satisfying a relationship “−2×Mg %+2≦ρ≦−2×Mg %+8”.


A method of producing the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 16 is a method of producing the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 6, the method comprising subjecting the aluminum alloy sheet to final cold rolling using a roll having a roll surface with an arithmetic average roughness Ra of 0.2 to 0.5 μm and a rolling oil with a viscosity of 1 to 6 cSt.


A method of producing the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 17 is a method of producing the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 6, the method comprising subjecting the aluminum alloy sheet to final cold rolling using a rolling oil, the Mg content (Mg %) of the aluminum alloy sheet and the viscosity p of the rolling oil satisfying a relationship “ρ≦2×Mg+4”.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing a wiping method for measuring the amount of aluminum powder.



FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a phenol residue analysis method for measuring the Fe content and the Si content of intermetallic compounds.





BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

The meanings and the reasons relating to the limitations on the alloy components of the aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate according to the present invention are given below. Specifically, most Mg is dissolved in aluminum to improve strength and thermal softening resistance. The term “strength” used herein refers to the tensile strength of a printing plate support at room temperature. The strength is preferably 160 MPa or more in practical applications. The term “thermal softening resistance” used herein is also called burning resistance, and refers to 0.2% proof stress after heating at about 280° C. The thermal softening resistance is preferably 90 MPa or more in practical applications. The Mg content is preferably 0.1 to 1.5%. If the Mg content is less than 0.1%, Mg may not exhibit a sufficient effect. If the Mg content exceeds 1.5%, the uniformity of pits obtained by the surface-roughening treatment may decrease, whereby a non-image area may easily become dirty.


Most Zn is dissolved in aluminum in the same manner as Mg. On the other hand, Zn does not improve strength and thermal softening resistance, but affects an oxide film formed on the surface of aluminum. The oxide film formed on the surface of aluminum is classified as an oxide film formed when allowed to stand at room temperature (spontaneous oxide film) and an oxide film formed during a heat treatment performed in the production process. Zn affects both of these oxide films.


Specifically, an aluminum alloy containing Mg tends to produce an oxide film mainly formed of an Mg oxide (MgO) during a heat treatment such as heating during homogenization or hot rolling or process annealing. Since such an oxide film is active and porous, wettability with a treatment liquid is improved during the electrolytic surface-roughening treatment so that surface roughening is promoted. On the other hand, pits tend to become non-uniform. Zn improves non-uniformity of the surface-roughened structure, and suppresses activation due to the Mg oxide. The Zn content is preferably 0.5% or less. If the Zn content exceeds 0.5%, an effect of suppressing activation due to the Mg oxide may increase so that surface roughening may become non-uniform. Moreover, since coarse intermetallic compounds tend to be produced, large pits may be formed during the electrolytic treatment, whereby surface-roughening uniformity may be further impaired. The Zn content is more preferably more than 0.05% and 0.5% or less, and still more preferably 0.06 to 0.5%.


Fe produces Al—Fe intermetallic compounds, and produces Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compounds together with Si. These compounds are dispersed to refine the recrystallization structure. Pits are uniformly formed from these compounds as starting points and are finely distributed during the electrolytic treatment. The Fe content is preferably 0.1 to 0.6%. If the Fe content is less than 0.1%, the distribution of the compounds may become non-uniform so that an unetched area may occur during the electrolytic treatment. As a result, formation of pits may become non-uniform. If the Fe content exceeds 0.6%, coarse compounds may be produced, whereby the uniformity of the surface-roughened structure may decrease.


Si produces Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compounds together with Fe. These compounds are dispersed to refine the recrystallization structure. Pits are uniformly formed from these compounds as starting points and are finely distributed during the electrolytic treatment. The Si content is preferably 0.03 to 0.15%. If the Fe content is less than 0.03%, the distribution of the compounds may become non-uniform so that an unetched area may occur during the electrolytic treatment. As a result, formation of pits may become non-uniform. If the Si content exceeds 0.15%, coarse compounds may be produced. Moreover, precipitation of Si tends to occur, whereby the uniformity of the surface-roughened structure may decrease.


Cu is easily dissolved in aluminum. When the Cu content is 0.0001 to 0.10%, Cu exhibits a pit refinement effect. If the Cu content exceeds 0.10%, pits may become large and non-uniform during the electrolytic treatment, and an unetched area may occur. In the present invention, the amount of Cu mixed from an ingot employed to obtain the above Fe content and Si content is about 5 to 100 ppm (0.0005 to 0.01%).


Ti refines an ingot structure and crystal grains. As a result, Ti makes formation of pits uniform during the electrolytic treatment to prevent occurrence of streaks during printing using the resulting printing plate. The Ti content is preferably 0.0001 to 0.05%. If the Ti content is less than 0.0001%, Ti may not exhibit a sufficient effect. If the Ti content exceeds 0.05%, coarse Al—Ti compounds may be produced, whereby the surface-roughened structure tends to become non-uniform. When adding B together with Ti in order to refine the ingot structure, the Ti content is preferably 0.01% or less.


Mn increases strength and thermal softening resistance. The Mn content is preferably more than 0.05% and 0.3% or less. If the Mn content is less than 0.05%, Mn may not exhibit a sufficient effect. If the Mn content exceeds 0.3%, coarse Al—Fe—Mn compounds or Al—Fe—Mn—Si compounds may be easily produced, whereby surface roughening during the electrolytic treatment may become non-uniform. The Mn content is more preferably 0.06 to 0.3%.


In the aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate according to the present invention, the Mg content and the Zn content preferably satisfy the relationship “4%×Zn %−1.4%≦Mg %≦4×Zn %+0.6%”. If the Mg content and the Zn content satisfy this relationship, formation of pits during the electrolytic treatment becomes more uniform so that an excellent surface-roughened structure can be obtained. If 4×Zn %−1.4%>Mg %, since the Zn content is in excess with respect to the Mg content, an effect of suppressing activation of the Mg oxide increases, whereby formation of pits during the electrolytic treatment may become non-uniform. As a result, formation of a roughened surface may become non-uniform. If Mg %>4×Zn %+0.6%, since the Mg content is in excess with respect to the Zn content, an effect of suppressing activation of the Mg oxide decreases, whereby formation of pits during the electrolytic treatment may become non-uniform. As a result, formation of a roughened surface may become non-uniform.


The aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate according to the present invention exhibits improved electrolytic graining properties by adding one or more of Pb, In, Sn, and Ga in an amount of 0.005 to 0.05% in total. Therefore, a desired pit pattern can be obtained with a small amount of electricity. If the total amount of one or more elements selected from the group consisting of Pb, In, Sn, and Ga is less than 0.005%, the effect of addition may be insufficient. If the total amount of one or more elements selected from the group consisting of Pb, In, Sn, and Ga exceeds 0.05%, the shape of pits may be deformed.


The aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate according to the present invention is produced by casting the above aluminum alloy by continuous casting or the like to obtain an ingot, homogenizing the resulting ingot, hot-rolling the homogenized product, and cold-rolling the hot-rolled product. It is important to adjust the amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the rolled sheet after final cold rolling to 0.1 to 3.0 mg/m2. The term “aluminum powder” used herein refers to an aluminum alloy powder which is produced from the aluminum alloy rolled sheet during final cold rolling and remains on the surface of the rolled sheet. In the aluminum alloy according to the present invention which contains Mg, if the amount of aluminum powder is less than 0.1 mg/m2, an effect of preventing abrasion of a coil may be insufficient when the rolled sheet is wound as a coil after final cold rolling. If the amount of aluminum powder exceeds 3.0 mg/m2, the aluminum powder may not be removed sufficiently during a degreasing process and remain on the surface of the sheet, whereby formation of pits may become insufficient or non-uniform in the area in which the aluminum powder remains during the electrolytic surface-roughening treatment, and an inferior appearance due to an unetched area or an irregular pattern may occur after electrolytic graining. Moreover, an excessive aluminum powder may contaminate the production line.


In order to adjust the amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the sheet after final cold rolling to the above range, it is necessary to adjust the degree of final cold rolling, the properties of the rolling oil, and the amount of rolling oil supplied depending on the composition in addition to adjusting the components. In particular, the viscosity of the rolling oil used for final cold rolling is important. It is preferable to use a rolling oil with a viscosity of 1 to 6 cSt. If the viscosity is less than 1 cSt, since the amount of rolling oil introduced between the roll and the rolled sheet decreases, a lubrication failure occurs, whereby a large amount of aluminum powder tends to be produced. If the viscosity exceeds 6 cSt, since the amount of rolling oil introduced between the roll and the rolled sheet increases to a large extent, the amount of aluminum powder produced tends to decrease.


If the Mg content (Mg %) of the aluminum alloy and the viscosity p of the rolling oil used for final cold rolling have the relationship (−2×Mg %+2)>ρ, deformation resistance decreases and the amount of rolling oil introduced between the roll and the rolled sheet decreases, whereby a large amount of aluminum powder tends to be produced. If ρ>(−2×Mg %+8), since the amount of rolling oil introduced between the roll and the rolled sheet increases to a large extent, the amount of aluminum powder produced tends to decrease.


In the present invention, when precipitates with a diameter (circle equivalent diameter) of 0.1 to 1.0 μm are dispersed on the surface of the sheet in a number of 10,000 to 100,000 per square millimeter (mm2), more uniform etch pits can be formed during the electrolytic treatment. If the number of precipitates is less than 10,000 per square millimeter, an unetched area tends to occur, whereby a number of large pits may be formed. If the number of precipitates exceeds 100,000 per square millimeter, it may be difficult to form uniform pits, thereby making it difficult to obtain an aluminum alloy sheet suitable as a lithographic printing support.


In the present invention, burning resistance can be maintained by setting the quantity of Fe in solid solution at 20 to 100 ppm so that uniform etch pits can be formed by the electrolytic treatment. If the amount of Fe dissolved is less than 20 ppm, burning resistance tends to decrease. If the amount of Fe dissolved exceeds 100 ppm, the pit pattern becomes non-uniform due a decrease in electrolytic surface-roughening properties. This makes it difficult to obtain an aluminum alloy sheet suitable as a lithographic printing support.


More uniform pits can be formed by the electrolytic treatment when some or all of the elements of the aluminum alloy sheet according to the present invention form intermetallic compounds, the content of Fe which forms an intermetallic compound is 50 to 99.8% of the total Fe content, the content of Si which forms an intermetallic compound is 5 to 40% of the total Si content, and the ratio (B %/A %) of the content (B %) of Fe which forms an Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compound to the content (A %) of Fe which forms an Al—Fe intermetallic compound is 0.9 or less.


If the content of Fe which forms an intermetallic compound is less than 50% of the total Fe content, since a sufficient number of intermetallic compounds as pit starting points may not be obtained, large pits tend to be formed. If the content of Fe which forms an intermetallic compound exceeds 99.8% of the total Fe content, since a large number of intermetallic compounds are produced, it may be difficult to obtain a uniform pit pattern. If the content of Si which forms an intermetallic compound is less than 5% of the total Si content, since the amount of Si dissolved increases, the potential difference between the matrix and the intermetallic compound decreases, whereby electrochemical solubility decreases. Moreover, precipitation of Si occurs to a large extent, whereby ink contamination tends to occur. If the content of Si which forms an intermetallic compound exceeds 40% of the total Si content, since a large number of intermetallic compounds are produced, it may be difficult to obtain a uniform pit pattern.


The Al—Fe intermetallic compound has an electrochemical solubility higher than that of the Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compound to more positively act as a pit starting point as compared with the Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compound. If the ratio (B %/A %) of the content (B %) of Fe which forms the Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compound to the content (A %) of Fe which forms the Al—Fe intermetallic compound is larger than 0.9, since pit formation efficiency decreases, large pits tend to be formed.


In the present invention, etch pits formed by the electrolytic surface-roughening treatment can be made more uniform by adjusting the number of oil pits with a diameter (circle equivalent diameter) of 30 μm or more formed in the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet after final cold rolling to 50 or less per square millimeter (mm2). Since the aluminum alloy according to the present invention contains Mg, large oil pit with a diameter of 30 μm or more tend to remain as large pits after electrolytic graining. If the number of such large pits exceeds 50 per square millimeter (mm2), etch pits formed by the electrolytic surface-roughening treatment tend to become non-uniform.


In order to adjust the number of oil pits with a diameter (circle equivalent diameter) of 30 μm or more to 50 or less per square millimeter (mm2), it is necessary to adjust the degree of final cold rolling, the configuration of the roll, the properties of the rolling oil, and the amount of rolling oil supplied. When using an aluminum alloy which contains Mg and has a relatively high deformation resistance as that of the aluminum alloy according to the present invention, it is preferable to use a roll having a roll surface with an arithmetic average roughness Ra of 0.2 to 0.5 μm during final cold rolling and to perform cold rolling using a rolling oil with a viscosity of 1 to 6 cSt.


If the roll surface has an arithmetic average roughness Ra exceeding 0.5 μm, the oil film breaks due to an increase in local contact pressure in the contact arc length, whereby the metal contact area increases. As a result, a lubrication failure tends to occur. If the arithmetic average roughness Ra is less than 0.2 μm, since the amount of rolling oil introduced between the roll and the rolled sheet increases to a large extent, the number of large oil pits may increase. If the viscosity of the rolling oil is less than 1 cSt, since the amount of rolling oil introduced between the roll and the rolled sheet decreases, a lubrication failure occurs. If the viscosity of the rolling oil exceeds 6 cSt, since the amount of rolling oil introduced between the roll and the rolled sheet increases to a large extent, the number of large oil pits may increase.


As the rolling oil used during final cold rolling, it is preferable to use a rolling oil which ensures that the Mg content (Mg %) of the aluminum alloy sheet and the viscosity ρ of the rolling oil satisfy the relationship “ρ≦2×Mg+4”. If ρ>(2×Mg+4), deformation resistance decreases. Moreover, since the amount of rolling oil introduced between the roll and the rolled sheet increases, a number of large pits tend to be formed.


In the present invention, occurrence of an inferior appearance after electrolytic graining due to irregular surface quality and streaks can be suppressed by specifying the grain size with respect to the surface of the sheet. Specifically, the average grain size in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction with respect to the surface of the sheet is adjusted to be 100 μm or less, and the average grain size in the direction parallel to the rolling direction with respect to the surface of the sheet is adjusted to be 2 to 20 times the average grain size in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction. If the average grain size in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction with respect to the surface of the sheet exceeds 100 μm, the surface quality may become irregular. If the average grain size in the direction parallel to the rolling direction with respect to the surface of the sheet is less than twice the average grain size in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction, the strength necessary for a printing plate support may not be obtained. If the average grain size in the direction parallel to the rolling direction with respect to the surface of the sheet is more than 20 times the average grain size in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction, streaks may occur.


The aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate according to the present invention is produced by casting the above aluminum alloy by continuous casting or the like to obtain an ingot, homogenizing the resulting ingot, hot-rolling the homogenized product, and cold-rolling the hot-rolled product.


It is preferable to face each rolling-side surface of the ingot by 3 to 15 mm. If the amount of scalping is less than 3 mm per side, since coarse crystal grains (coarse crystal) in the vicinity of the ingot surface may be removed to only a small extent, the faced surface may have a non-uniform structure, whereby streaks may occur. If the amount of scalping exceeds 15 mm per side, economic efficiency may be impaired due to a decrease in yield.


When producing the aluminum alloy sheet in which precipitates with a diameter (circle equivalent diameter) of 0.1 to 1.0 μm are dispersed on the surface of the sheet in a number of 10,000 to 100,000 per square millimeter (mm2), the operation from the ingot homogenization treatment to hot rolling is preferably carried out as follows.


The temperature increase rate of the ingot during the homogenization treatment is preferably 20 to 60° C./hr. This is effective to obtain the above precipitate distribution. If the temperature increase rate is less than 20° C./hr, precipitation proceeds so that the diameter of the precipitate tends to exceed 1 μm and the number of precipitates decreases. Moreover, economic efficiency may be impaired since heating requires time. If the temperature increase rate exceeds 60° C./hr, it is difficult to obtain specific precipitates since precipitation does not proceed due to too high a temperature increase rate.


The homogenization treatment is preferably performed at 450 to 580° C. for one hour or more. The homogenization treatment causes Fe and Si which have been dissolved to supersaturation to uniformly precipitate. As a result, etch pits formed during the electrolytic treatment have a minute circular shape, whereby plate wear is improved. If the homogenization treatment temperature is less than 450° C., precipitation of Fe and Si which serve as pit starting points may be insufficient so that an unetched area may be formed during the electrolytic treatment. As a result, the pit pattern may become non-uniform. If the homogenization treatment temperature exceeds 580° C., since the quantity of Fe in solid solution increases, the number of minute precipitates which serve as pit starting points decreases. If the homogenization treatment time is less than one hour, precipitation of Fe and Si becomes insufficient, whereby the pit pattern may become non-uniform.


The hot rolling start temperature is preferably 400 to 520° C. If the hot rolling start temperature is less than 400° C., precipitation of Fe and Si which serve as pit starting points may be insufficient so that an unetched area may be formed during the electrolytic treatment. As a result, the pit pattern may become non-uniform. Moreover, since the degree of rolling cannot be increased due to an increase in deformation resistance, the number of rolling passes increases, whereby economic efficiency may be impaired. If the hot rolling start temperature exceeds 520° C., since coarse recrystallized grains are produced during hot rolling, streaks tend to occur due to the streak-shaped non-uniform structure.


The hot rolling finish temperature is preferably 320 to 400° C. If the hot rolling finish temperature is less than 320° C., recrystallization may occur only partially, whereby an unrecrystallized area may cause streaks. Moreover, since the amount of strain accumulated after final cold rolling may increase, the recrystallizing temperature may decrease, whereby burning resistance may decrease. If the hot rolling finish temperature exceeds 400° C., recrystallization occurs over the entire surface. However, since coarse crystal grains are produced, streaks may occur. The thickness of the sheet when finishing hot rolling is preferably 5 mm or less. If the thickness of the sheet when finishing hot rolling is 5 mm or more, the rolling rate during hot rolling may become insufficient so that the amount of strain introduced may decrease, whereby recrystallized grains may become coarse.


When producing the aluminum alloy sheet in which the quantity of Fe in solid solution is adjusted to 20 to 100 ppm, the operation from the ingot homogenization treatment to hot rolling is preferably carried out as follows.


The temperature increase rate of the ingot during the homogenization treatment is preferably 20 to 60° C./hr. This is effective to obtain the above specific dissolution state. If the temperature increase rate is less than 20° C./h, the amount of dissolution may decrease to a large extent due to an increase in the amount of precipitation. Moreover, economic efficiency may be impaired since heating requires time. If the temperature increase rate exceeds 60° C./hr, it is difficult to obtain the above specific dissolution state since precipitation does not proceed due to too high a temperature increase rate.


The homogenization treatment is preferably performed at 450 to 580° C. for one hour or more. By the homogenization treatment, Fe and Si which have been dissolved to supersaturation, are uniformly and minutely precipitated. As a result, etch pits formed during the electrolytic treatment have a minute circular shape, whereby plate wear is improved. If the homogenization treatment temperature is less than 450° C., precipitation of Fe and Si (i.e., a reduction in the quantity of Fe and Si in solid solution) may be insufficient. As a result, the pit pattern may become non-uniform. If the homogenization treatment temperature exceeds 580° C., since the quantity of Fe in solid solution may increase to a large extent, the pit pattern may become non-uniform. If the homogenization treatment time is less than one hour, the dissolution state of Fe and Si in the longitudinal direction and the width direction becomes non-uniform, whereby the pit pattern may become non-uniform.


It is possible to control precipitation of Fe and Si by decreasing the temperature to room temperature after the homogenization treatment, whereby the desired dissolution state can be obtained.


The hot rolling start temperature is preferably 350 to 500° C. If the hot rolling start temperature is less than 350° C., since the degree of rolling cannot be increased due to an increase in deformation resistance, the number of rolling passes increases, whereby economic efficiency may be impaired. If the hot rolling start temperature exceeds 500° C., since coarse recrystallized grains are produced during hot rolling, streaks tend to occur due to the streak-shaped non-uniform structure.


The hot rolling finish temperature is preferably 300 to 380° C. If the hot rolling finish temperature is less than 300° C., recrystallization may occur only partially, whereby an unrecrystallized area may cause streaks. Moreover, since the amount of strain accumulated after final cold rolling may increase, the recrystallizing temperature may decrease, whereby burning resistance may decrease. If the hot rolling finish temperature exceeds 380° C., recrystallization occurs over the entire surface. However, since coarse crystal grains are produced, streaks may occur. The thickness of the sheet when finishing hot rolling is preferably 5 mm or less. If the thickness of the sheet when finishing hot rolling is 5 mm or more, the rolling rate during hot rolling may become insufficient so that the amount of strain introduced may decrease, whereby recrystallized grains may become coarse.


When producing the aluminum alloy sheet in which some or all of the elements of the aluminum alloy sheet form intermetallic compounds, the content of Fe which forms an intermetallic compound is 50 to 99.8% of the total Fe content, the content of Si which forms an intermetallic compound is 5 to 40% of the total Si content, and the ratio (B %/A %) of the content (B %) of Fe which forms an Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compound to the content (A %) of Fe which forms an Al—Fe intermetallic compound is 0.9 or less, the operation from the ingot homogenization treatment to hot rolling is preferably carried out as follows.


The homogenization treatment is preferably performed at 450 to 580° C. for three hours or more. The homogenization treatment causes Fe and Si which have been dissolved to supersaturation to uniformly precipitate. As a result, etch pits formed during the electrolytic treatment have a minute circular shape, whereby plate wear is improved. If the homogenization treatment temperature is less than 450° C., precipitation of Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compounds which serve as pit starting points to only a small extent may proceed so that large pits may be formed due to a decrease in pit formation efficiency. As a result, the pit pattern may become non-uniform. If the homogenization treatment temperature exceeds 580° C., since the quantity of Fe in solid solution increases, precipitation of Al—Fe intermetallic compounds which serve as pit starting points to a large extent decreases. If the homogenization treatment time is less than three hours, precipitation of Fe and Si becomes insufficient, whereby the pit pattern may become non-uniform.


It is preferable to decrease the temperature of the ingot to the hot rolling start temperature at a temperature decrease rate of 20 to 60° C./hr after the homogenization treatment, and to start hot rolling at 400 to 500° C. Precipitation proceeds when decreasing the temperature of the ingot after the homogenization treatment. In particular, precipitation of not only Fe but also Si proceeds when decreasing the temperature of the ingot to 400 to 450° C. If the temperature decrease rate is less than 20° C./hr, precipitation of Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compounds proceeds to a large extent. When precipitation proceeds further, the diameter of the precipitate may exceed 1 μm and the number of precipitates decreases. Moreover, economic efficiency may be impaired since heating requires time. If the temperature decrease rate exceeds 60° C./hr, the period of time for precipitation may be insufficient. Moreover, since the temperature of the ingot may become non-uniform, precipitation of Fe and Si also may become non-uniform. As a result, recrystallization during the subsequent hot rolling may become non-uniform, whereby streaks tend to occur.


The hot rolling start temperature is preferably 400 to 500° C. If the hot rolling start temperature is less than 400° C., since the degree of rolling cannot be increased due to an increase in deformation resistance, the number of rolling passes increases, whereby economic efficiency may be impaired. If the hot rolling start temperature exceeds 500° C., since coarse recrystallized grains are produced during hot rolling, streaks tend to occur due to the streak-shaped non-uniform structure.


The hot rolling finish temperature is preferably 300 to 400° C. If the hot rolling finish temperature is less than 300° C., recrystallization may occur only partially, whereby an unrecrystallized area may cause streaks. Moreover, since the amount of strain accumulated after final cold rolling may increase, the recrystallizing temperature may decrease, whereby burning resistance may decrease. If the hot rolling finish temperature exceeds 400° C., recrystallization occurs over the entire surface. However, since coarse crystal grains are produced, an irregular pattern or streaks may occur. The thickness of the sheet when finishing hot rolling is preferably 5 mm or less. If the thickness of the sheet when finishing hot rolling is 5 mm or more, the rolling rate during hot rolling may become insufficient so that the amount of strain introduced may decrease, whereby recrystallized grains may become coarse.


The aluminum alloy sheet subjected to hot rolling as described above is cold-rolled without being subjected to process annealing. Cold rolling is performed after hot rolling in order to provide a strength which prevents breakage when winding a support around a plate cylinder and adjusting the length of crystal grains produced during hot rolling or immediately after hot rolling in the direction parallel to the rolling direction when applying the aluminum alloy sheet as a lithographic printing support. The degree of rolling is preferably 50 to 98%. If the degree of rolling is less than 50%, it is difficult to provide a strength which prevents breakage when winding the support around a plate cylinder. If the degree of rolling exceeds 98%, crystal grains produced after hot rolling extend to a large extent along the direction parallel to the rolling direction, whereby streaks tend to occur. After cold rolling, finish cold rolling may be performed using a roll provided with a special pattern on the surface to obtain an aluminum alloy sheet having a surface roughness indicated by an arithmetic average roughness Ra of 0.15 to 0.30 μm, an average elevation/depression dimension RSm of 50 μm or less in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction, a maximum depression depth Rv of 1 μm or less, and a maximum height Rz of 1.5 to 2.5 μm.


The amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the sheet, the precipitate distribution, the quantity of Fe in solid solution, the relationship between the intermetallic compounds and the Fe content and the Si content, the oil pit distribution, and the crystal grain size as specified above are obtained by combining the above composition and production steps, whereby a 0.2% proof stress after a heat treatment at 270° C. for seven minutes of 120 MPa or more is achieved. The above strength properties are important for a printing plate support. If the 0.2% proof stress is less than 120 MPa, the secured portion of the printing plate may be deformed or damaged during printing, whereby incorrect printing or the like may occur.


EXAMPLES

Examples according to the present invention are described below in contrast with comparison examples to demonstrate the effects of the present invention. Note that these examples illustrate only preferred embodiments of the present invention. The present invention is not limited to these examples.


Example 1 and Comparison Example 1

As a specimen aluminum alloy, an aluminum alloy having a composition shown in Table 1 was melted and cast. Each rolling side of the resulting ingot was faced by 5 mm to reduced to the thickness of the ingot to 500 mm. The ingot was heated to 530° C. at a temperature increase rate of 35° C./hr. The ingot was then subjected to homogenization at 530° C. for 3.5 hours.


The temperature of the ingot was decreased to 515° C. (hot rolling start temperature) at a temperature decrease rate of 35° C./hr from the homogenization treatment temperature (530° C.). The ingot was then hot-rolled to a thickness of 3 mm. Hot rolling was finished at 346° C. The hot-rolled product was cold-rolled to a thickness of 0.3 mm without being subjected to process annealing. The arithmetic average roughness Ra of a roll used for cold rolling was 0.3 μm, and the viscosity of a rolling oil was 3 cSt. In Table 1, a value outside the condition according to the present invention is underlined. A case where the relational equation “(4×Zn %−1.4%)≦Mg %≦(4×Zn %+0.6%)” relating to the Mg content and the Zn content was satisfied is indicated by “Good”, and a case where the relational equation “(4×Zn %−1.4%)≦Mg %≦(4×Zn %+0.6%)” relating to the Mg content and the Zn content was not satisfied is indicated by “Bad”.


The amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the sheet after cold rolling, the number of precipitates with a diameter of 0.1 to 1.0 μm, the number of oil pits with a diameter of 30 μm or more formed in the surface of the sheet, and the crystal grain size of the resulting aluminum alloy sheet (specimen) were measured according to the following methods. The results are shown in Table 2. The burning resistance of the resulting aluminum alloy sheet was evaluated, and the presence or absence of scratches due to rubbing which occurred on a coil wound after cold rolling was observed. The results are shown in Table 3. In Table 2, the term “crystal length” indicates the crystal grain size (GL) in the direction parallel to the rolling direction with respect to the surface of the sheet, the term “crystal width” indicates the crystal grain size (GT) in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction, and the term “ratio” indicates the ratio (GL/GT) of the crystal grain size (GL) to the crystal grain size (GT). A value outside the condition according to the present invention is underlined.


Measurement of amount of aluminum powder: As a quantitative analysis of residual powder on the surface of the sheet, a specific area of the surface of the sheet was wiped off with an absorbent cotton immersed in a solvent, and the aluminum content of the absorbent cotton was measured. FIG. 1 shows a wiping method.


Measurement of number of precipitates with a diameter (circle equivalent diameter) of 0.1 to 1.0 μm: After degreasing and washing the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet, the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet was etched for 10 seconds using an aqueous solution (Keller's reagent) prepared by mixing nitric acid, hydrofluoric acid, and hydrochloric acid, and was photographed using an optical microscope at a magnification of 1000. The particle diameter distribution of precipitates was measured using an image analyzer (Luzex 500 manufactured by Nireco Corporation). The diameter of the precipitate was converted into the diameter of a circle having the same area as that of the precipitate in the photograph (i.e., circle equivalent diameter), and the intermetallic compound distribution density was determined from the results.


Measurement of number of oil pits: After degreasing and washing the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet, the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at a magnification of 500. The number of oil pits and their distribution were measured by an intercept method.


Measurement of crystal grain size: After degreasing and washing the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet, the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet was mirror-polished and then anodized using Parker's reagent. The crystal grains were observed in a polarization mode of an optical microscope, and the crystal grain size in the direction perpendicular or parallel to the rolling direction was determined using an intercept method.


Evaluation of burning resistance: As an index of thermal softening resistance, the aluminum sheet was heated in an atmospheric furnace maintained at 270° C. for seven minutes, and was subjected to a tensile test to measure the 0.2% proof stress. The burning resistance of a support was evaluated based on the 0.2% proof stress. The proof stress was measured in the direction (direction L) parallel to the rolling direction of the aluminum alloy sheet. A case where the 0.2% proof stress after heating at 270° C. for seven minutes was 120 MPa or more was evaluated as “Good”, and a case where the 0.2% proof stress was less than 120 MPa was evaluated as “Bad”.


Observation of the presence or absence of coil scratches due to rubbing: A case where scratches due to rubbing were observed in a specific area of the surface of the sheet with the naked eye was evaluated as “Bad”, and a case where scratches due to rubbing were not observed was evaluated as “Good”.


The resulting aluminum alloy sheet was subjected to degreasing (solution: 5% sodium hydroxide, temperature: 60° C., time: 10 seconds), neutralization (solution: 10% nitric acid, temperature: 20° C., time: 30 seconds), an alternating-current electrolytic surface-roughening treatment (solution: 2.0% hydrochloric acid, temperature: 25° C., frequency: 50 Hz, current density: 60 A/dm2, time: 20 seconds), a desmut process (solution: 5% sodium hydroxide, temperature: 60° C., time: 5 seconds), and an anodizing process (solution: 30% sulfuric acid, temperature: 20° C., time: 60 seconds). The aluminum alloy sheet was then washed with water, dried, and cut to a specific size to prepare a specimen.


The presence or absence of an irregular pattern and streaks was observed for each specimen. The surface of the specimen was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at a magnification of 500. The surface of the specimen was photographed so that the field of view was 0.04 mm2. Occurrence of an unetched area and uniformity of etch pits were evaluated based on the resulting photograph. The results are shown in Table 3.


Observation of the presence or absence of irregular pattern: A case where a significant irregular pattern was observed on the surface of the specimen with the naked eye was evaluated as “Bad”, a case where no significant irregular pattern was observed was evaluated as “Good”, and a case where no irregular pattern was observed was evaluated as “Excellent”.


Observation of the presence or absence of streaks: A case where streaks were observed on the surface of the specimen with the naked eye was evaluated as “Bad”, and a case where streaks were not observed was evaluated as “Good”.


Evaluation of occurrence of unetched area: A case where the percentage of an unetched area exceeded 20% was evaluated as “Bad”, a case where the percentage of an unetched area was 15 to 20% was evaluated as “Good”, and a case where the percentage of an unetched area was less than 15% was evaluated as “Excellent”.


Evaluation of uniformity of etch pits: A case where the area ratio of large pits with a circle equivalent diameter exceeding 10 μm was more than 10% with respect to all pits was evaluated as “Bad”, a case where the area ratio was 5 to 10% was evaluated as “Good”, and a case where the area ratio was less than 5% was evaluated as “Excellent”.












TABLE 1









Composition (wt %)



































Pb +











Relational




In +


Alloy
Mg
Zn
Fe
Si
Cu
Ti
Mn
equation
Pb
In
Sn
Ga
Sn + Ga
Remarks
























A
0.22
0.110
0.31
0.06
0.0050
0.0130
0.002
Good
0.0002
0.0003
0.0003
0.010
0.0108
Example


B
0.13
0.070
0.16
0.03
0.0002
0.0007
0.006
Good
0.0006
0.0006
0.0001
0.013
0.0143
Example


C
0.51
0.200
0.28
0.09
0.0021
0.0140
0.080
Good
0.0003
0.0009
0.0004
0.019
0.0206
Example


D
1.40
0.120
0.40
0.07
0.0007
0.0053
0.003
Bad
0.0004
0.0002
0.0010
0.014
0.0156
Example


E
0.21
0.450
0.33
0.07
0.0009
0.015
0.006
Bad
0.0031
0.0011
0.0011
0.014
0.0193
Example


F
0.002
 0.0003
0.30
0.06
0.0008
0.0200
0.003
Good
0.0001
0.0016
0.0006
0.017
0.0193
Comparative Example


G

2.54

0.490
0.25
0.05
0.0300
0.0310
0.008
Good
0.0015
0.0001
0.0009
0.020
0.0225
Comparative Example


H
1.40

0.650

0.31
0.07
0.0011
0.0140
0.003
Good
0.0011
0.0000
0.0008
0.021
0.0229
Comparative Example


I
0.12
0.140

0.06


0.01

0.0730
0.0009
0.010
Good
0.0017
0.0004
0.0018
0.016
0.0199
Comparative Example


J
0.92
0.310

0.81


0.21

0.0263
0.0072
0.180
Good
0.0005
0.0003
0.0023
0.018
0.0211
Comparative Example


K
0.21
0.100
0.30
0.07

0.1500

0.0009
0.180
Good
0.0019
0.0010
0.0007
0.020
0.0236
Comparative Example


L
0.67
0.230
0.25
0.13
0.0110

0.1249

0.220
Good
0.0010
0.0005
0.0001
0.017
0.0186
Comparative Example


M
1.22
0.420
0.37
0.05
0.0140
0.0101

0.410

Good
0.0005
0.0006
0.00042
0.0009
0.0143
Comparative Example


O
1.10
0.39 
0.12
0.11
0.0067
0.0005
0.160
Good
0.0089
0.0092
0.0055
0.040
0.0636
Comparative Example



























TABLE 2













Number of oil








Viscosity


Amount of

pits with
Crystal
Crystal





ρ of
Relationship I
Relationship II
aluminum

diameter of 30 μm
length
width




Ra of roll
rolling oil
between
between
powder
Precipitate
or more
GL
GT
Ratio


Specimen
Alloy
(μm)
(cSt)
Mg and ρ
Mg and ρ
mg/m2
(/mm2)
(/mm2)
(μm)
(μm)
GL/GT


























1
A
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.50
65520
40
678
68
10.0


2
B
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.80
28040
45
810
79
10.3


3
C
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.01
73000
35
649
64
10.1


4
D
0.3
3
Good
Good
0.12
67860
8
676
63
10.7


5
E
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.62
71150
38
667
70
9.5


6
F
0.3
3
Bad
Good

4.02

62660
75
729
77
9.5


7
G
0.3
3
Bad
Good

0.02

60100
2
740
70
10.6


8
H
0.3
3
Good
Good
0.25
60000
10
730
70
10.4


9
I
0.3
3
Good
Good

3.06

6980
46
1200

123

9.8


10
J
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.08

159980

21
552
51
10.8


11
K
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.39
66250
42
675
62
10.9


12
L
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.67
57700
33
613
59
10.4


13
M
0.3
3
Good
Good
0.70
80310
20
580
57
10.2


14
O
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.30
60070
30
1110
93
11.9





Note:


Relationship I between Mg and ρ: −2 × Mg % + 2 ≦ ρ ≦ −2 × Mg % + 8 (satisfied: Good, not satisfied: Bad)


Relationship II between Mg and ρ: ρ ≦ 2 × Mg % + 4 (satisfied: Good, not satisfied: Bad)



















TABLE 3






Burning resistance







Specimen
(MPa)
Scratch
Unetched area
Pit uniformity
Irregular pattern
Streaks





















1
149
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Good


2
130
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Good


3
170
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Good


4
226
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good


5
140
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good


6
85
Good
Bad
Bad
Bad
Good


7
241
Bad
Good
Bad
Good
Good


8
220
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


9
98
Good
Bad
Bad
Bad
Good


10
219
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


11
148
Good
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


12
183
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


13
209
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


14
175
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good









As shown in Table 3, specimens No. 1 to No. 5 according to the present invention did not show scratches due to rubbing, exhibited excellent burning resistance, did not produce an irregular pattern and streaks, exhibited excellent etching properties after the electrolytic treatment, and had uniform etch pits over the entire surface.


On the other hand, specimen No. 6 exhibited inferior burning resistance due to low Mg content. Moreover, the amount of aluminum powder increased, and formation of pits became non-uniform. An inferior appearance due to an unetched area and an irregular pattern occurred after electrolytic graining. Specimen No. 7 exhibited inferior pit uniformity due to high Mg content. Moreover, the amount of aluminum powder decreased, and coil scratches due to rubbing occurred. Specimen No. 8 was non-uniformly surface-roughened due to high Zn content. Specimen No. 9 had a small number of precipitates due to low Fe content and low Si content. The distribution of Al—Fe intermetallic compounds and Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compounds became non-uniform, whereby formation of pits became non-uniform. Moreover, the amount of precipitation and the amount of dissolution decreased due to low Fe content, resulting in insufficient burning resistance. Specimen No. 10 produced a large number of precipitates due to high Fe content and high Si content to produce coarse compounds. Therefore, uniformity of the surface-roughened structure decreased. In specimen No. 11, pits became large and non-uniform and an unetched area occurred during the electrolytic treatment due to high Cu content. Specimen No. 12 produced coarse Al—Ti compounds due to high Ti content, whereby the surface-roughened structure became non-uniform. Specimen No. 13 produced coarse Al—Fe—Mn compounds or Al—Fe—Mn—Si compounds due to high Mn content, whereby surface roughening during the electrolytic treatment became non-uniform. In specimen No. 14, the shape of pits was deformed and became non-uniform since the total amount of Pb, In, Sn, and Ga exceeded 0.05%.


Example 2 and Comparative Example 2

An ingot of an aluminum alloy A cast in Example 1 was subjected to scalping of rolling surface, homogenization, and hot rolling under conditions shown in Table 4. The hot-rolled product was cold-rolled to a thickness shown in Table 4 without being subjected to process annealing. Table 5 shows the surface roughness of a roll and the viscosity of a rolling oil used for cold rolling. In Tables 4 and 5, a value outside the condition according to the present invention is underlined.


The amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the sheet after cold rolling, the number of precipitates with a diameter of 0.1 to 1.0 μm, the number of oil pits with a diameter of 30 μm or more formed in the surface of the sheet, and the crystal grain size of the resulting aluminum alloy sheet (specimen) were measured according to the above-described methods. The results are shown in Table 5. Evaluation of burning resistance, observation of the presence or absence of scratches due to rubbing which occurred on a coil wound after cold rolling, an irregular pattern, and streaks, and evaluation of etching properties were conducted according to the above-described methods. The results are shown in Table 6.














TABLE 4











Cold




Homogenization treatment
Hot rolling
rolling


















Amount of
Temperature


Temperature
Start
Finish
Sheet
Sheet




scalping
increase rate
Temperature
Time
decrease rate
temperature
temperature
thickness
thickness


Specimen
(mm/side)
(° C./hr)
(° C.)
(hr)
(° C./hr)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(mm)
(mm)
Remarks





15
5
37
538
3
35
470
355
3
0.3
Example


16
10 
40
460
5
35
384
336
5
0.3
Example


17
  1.5
31
502
2
35
450
340
2
0.3
Comparative Example


18
6

10

580
4
35
491
370
4
0.3
Comparative Example


19
7

70

580
4
35
479
366
4
0.3
Comparative Example


20
7
34

410

3
35
400
329
3
0.3
Comparative Example


21
8
35

610

3
35
411
333
3
0.3
Comparative Example


22
4
37
538
  0.5
35
473
350
3
0.3
Comparative Example


23
9
29
595
5
35

331


272

3
0.3
Comparative Example


24
9
27
598
5
35

515


420

3
0.3
Comparative Example


25
12 
40
460
5
35
388
341
  6.5
0.3
Comparative Example


26
5
35
545
3
35
470
355
3
0.3
Comparative Example


27
5
35
545
3
35
465
339
3
0.3
Comparative Example


28
5
35
545
3
35
468
342
3
0.3
Comparative Example


29
5
35
545
3
35
475
332
3
0.3
Comparative Example


























TABLE 5












Number of oil







Viscosity


Amount of

pits with



Ra
ρ of
Relationship I
Relationship II
aluminum

diameter of 30 μm
Crystal
Crystal



of roll
rolling oil
between
between
powder
Precipitate
or more
length GL
width GT
Ratio


Specimen
(μm)
(cSt)
Mg and ρ
Mg and ρ
(mg/m2)
(/mm2)
(/mm2)
(μm)
(μm)
GL/GT

























15
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.42
67920
41
641
62
10.3


16
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.95
97850
32
1621
90
18.0


17
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.64
76400
47
368
51
 7.2


18
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.50

113700

32
1052
79
13.3


19
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.78
8080
29
979
76
12.9


20
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.88
9160
33
910
89
10.2


21
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.35
4520
22
822
76
10.8


22
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.64
5910
18
626
66
 9.5


23
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.74
54220
35

Not


Not













recrystallized


recrystallized



24
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.56
60030
42
1190

125

 9.5


25
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.39
81250
31
4115

189


21.8



26
0.05
3
Good
Good

0.07

63600

71

400
54
 7.4


27
0.6
3
Good
Good

10.05

69450
 6
512
55
 9.3


28
0.3
  0.5
Bad
Good
3.80
60900
 6
620
63
 9.8


29
0.3

7

Bad
Bad
0.04
 7170

96

385
50
 7.7





Note:


Relationship I between Mg and ρ: −2 × Mg % + 2 ≦ ρ ≦ −2 × Mg % + 8 (satisfied: Good, not satisfied: Bad)


Relationship II between Mg and ρ: ρ ≦ 2 × Mg % + 4 (satisfied: Good, not satisfied: Bad)



















TABLE 6






Burning resistance







Specimen
(MPa)
Scratch
Unetched area
Pit uniformity
Irregular pattern
Streaks





















15
143
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Good


16
126
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good


17
140
Excellent
Good
Good
Good
Bad


18
94
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


19
156
Good
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


20
160
Excellent
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


21
159
Excellent
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


22
166
Good
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


23
89
Excellent
Good
Good
Bad
Bad


24
165
Excellent
Good
Good
Bad
Good


25
125
Good
Good
Good
Bad
Good


26
130
Bad
Good
Bad
Good
Good


27
125
Excellent
Bad
Bad
Bad
Good


28
146
Excellent
Bad
Bad
Bad
Good


29
135
Bad
Good
Bad
Good
Good









As shown in Table 6, specimens No. 15 and No. 16 according to the present invention did not show scratches due to rubbing, exhibited excellent burning resistance, did not produce an irregular pattern and streaks, exhibited excellent etching properties after the electrolytic treatment, and had uniform etch pits over the entire surface. Specimen No. 17 produced streaks due to a small amount of scalping. In specimen No. 18, since the temperature increase rate of the ingot during the homogenization treatment was low, the diameter of the precipitates exceeded 1 μm and the number of precipitates decreased. Formation of pits was non-uniform due to the presence of an unetched area. Moreover, since the amount of precipitation increased to a large extent, the quantity of Fe in solid solution became insufficient, whereby burning resistance decreased. In specimen No. 19, since the temperature increase rate of the ingot during the homogenization treatment was high, precipitation did not proceed sufficiently so that pit starting points were insufficiently formed. An unetched area was formed during the electrolytic treatment, and uniformity of pits was impaired. In specimen No. 20, since the homogenization treatment temperature was low, precipitation of Fe and Si which serve as pit starting points was insufficient so that an unetched area was formed during the electrolytic treatment. As a result, the pit pattern became non-uniform. In specimen No. 21, since the homogenization treatment temperature was high, The quantity of Fe in solid solution increased. As a result, the number of minute precipitates which serve as pit starting points decreased. An unetched area was formed, and the pit pattern became non-uniform. In specimen No. 22, since the homogenization treatment time was short, precipitation of Fe and Si became insufficient, whereby the pit pattern became non-uniform due to formation of an unetched area. In specimen No. 22, since the hot rolling start temperature was low, the hot rolling finish temperature decreased. As a result, recrystallization occurred only partially, whereby streaks occurred. Moreover, since the amount of strain accumulated after final cold rolling increased, the recrystallizing temperature decreased, whereby burning resistance decreased. In specimen No. 24, since the hot rolling start temperature was high, the hot rolling finish temperature increased. Although recrystallization occurred over the entire surface, coarse crystal grains were formed, whereby irregular surface quality and streaks occurred. In specimen No. 25, since the thickness of the sheet when finishing hot rolling was large, the rolling rate during hot rolling became insufficient so that the amount of strain introduced decreased, whereby recrystallized grains became coarse. As a result, the surface quality became irregular. In specimen No. 26, since the arithmetic average roughness of the roll surface was small, the amount of rolling oil introduced between the roll and the rolled sheet increased to a large extent, whereby the number of large oil pits increased. As a result, etch pits formed during the electrolytic surface-roughening treatment became non-uniform. Moreover, since the amount of powder decreased, scratches due to rubbing were observed. In specimen No. 27, since the arithmetic average roughness of the roll surface was large, the amount of rolling oil introduced between the roll and the rolled sheet decreased, whereby a lubrication failure occurred. As a result, the amount of powder increased, whereby formation of pits became non-uniform. An inferior appearance due to an unetched area or an irregular pattern occurred after electrolytic graining. In specimen No. 27, since the viscosity of the rolling oil was low, the amount of rolling oil introduced between the roll and the rolled sheet decreased, whereby a lubrication failure occurred. As a result, the amount of aluminum powder increased, whereby formation of pits became non-uniform. An inferior appearance due to an unetched area or an irregular pattern occurred after electrolytic graining. In specimen No. 29, since the viscosity of the rolling oil was high, the amount of rolling oil introduced between the roll and the rolled sheet increased to a large extent, whereby the number of large oil pits increased. As a result, etch pits formed during the electrolytic surface-roughening treatment became non-uniform. Moreover, since the amount of powder decreased, coil scratches due to rubbing were observed.


Example 3 and Comparative Example 3

Each rolling side of an ingot of an aluminum alloy (Table 1) cast in Example 1 was faced by 5 mm to reduce the thickness of the ingot to 500 mm. The ingot was heated to 530° C. at a temperature increase rate of 35° C./hr. The ingot was then subjected to homogenization at 530° C. for 3.5 hours.


The ingot was heated to 469° C. (hot rolling start temperature) and was then hot-rolled to a thickness of 3 mm. Hot rolling was finished at 353° C. The hot-rolled product was cold-rolled to a thickness of 0.3 mm without being subjected to process annealing. The arithmetic average roughness Ra of a roll used for cold rolling was 0.3 μm, and the viscosity of a rolling oil was 3 cSt.


The amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the sheet after cold rolling, the number of precipitates with a diameter of 0.1 to 1.0 μm, the number of oil pits with a diameter of 30 μm or more formed in the surface of the sheet, and the crystal grain size of the resulting aluminum alloy sheet (specimen) were measured according to the above-described methods. The quantity of Fe in solid solution was measured according to the following method. The results are shown in Table 7. Evaluation of burning resistance, observation of the presence or absence of scratches due to rubbing which occurred on a coil wound after cold rolling, an irregular pattern, and streaks, and evaluation of etching properties were conducted according to the above-described methods. The results are shown in Table 8. In Table 7, a value outside the condition according to the present invention is underlined.


Measurement of the quantity of Fe in solid solution: The aluminum alloy sheet was dissolved in hot phenol, and the Fe content of the filtrate was measured. The details are described in “Measurement of amount of dissolution by wet chemical analysis” in Light Metal vol. 50 (2000), pages 518 to 526.



















TABLE 7












Number of oil







Viscosity


Amount of

pits with




ρ of
Relationship I
Relationship II
aluminum

diameter of 30 μm
Crystal
Crystal



Ra of roll
rolling oil
between
between
powder
Precipitate
or more
length GL
width GT
Ratio


Specimen
(μm)
(cSt)
Mg and ρ
Mg and ρ
(mg/m2)
(/mm2)
(/mm2)
(μm)
(μm)
GL/GT

























30
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.35
70030
41
35
63
10.4


31
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.78
31200
30
46
75
10.7


32
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.92
73510
53
38
65
9.7


33
0.3
3
Good
Good
0.10
66780
92
7
61
11.3


34
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.71
73150
47
40
70
9.4


35
0.3
3
Bad
Good

4.20

60060
30
88
67
10.6


36
0.3
3
Bad
Good

0.02

62390
26
2
73
10.4


37
0.3
3
Good
Good
0.30
60840
44
15
70
10.6


38
0.3
3
Good
Good

3.24

 7120
15
51

135

10.7


39
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.00

167000


120

20
48
10.9


40
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.51
65110
30
40
62
10.6


41
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.59
59430
28
29
59
10.0


42
0.3
3
Good
Good
0.66
81000
86
23
57
10.5


43
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.30
62070
21
34
97
10.8





Note:


Relationship I between Mg and ρ: −2 × Mg % + 2 ≦ ρ ≦ −2 × Mg % + 8 (satisfied: Good, not satisfied: Bad)


Relationship II between Mg and ρ: ρ ≦ 2 × Mg % + 4 (satisfied: Good, not satisfied: Bad)



















TABLE 8






Burning resistance







Specimen
(MPa)
Scratch
Unetched area
Pit uniformity
Irregular pattern
Streaks





















30
140
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Good


31
132
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Good


32
166
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Bad


33
210
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good


34
138
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good


35
88
Good
Bad
Bad
Bad
Good


36
243
Bad
Good
Bad
Good
Good


37
205
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


38
95
Good
Bad
Bad
Bad
Good


39
200
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


40
142
Good
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


41
189
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


42
209
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


43
171
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good









As shown in Table 8, specimens No. 30 to No. 34 according to the present invention did not show scratches due to rubbing, exhibited excellent burning resistance, did not produce an irregular pattern and streaks, exhibited excellent etching properties after the electrolytic treatment, and had uniform etch pits over the entire surface. On the other hand, specimen No. 35 exhibited inferior burning resistance due to low Mg content. Moreover, the amount of aluminum powder increased, and formation of pits became non-uniform. An inferior appearance due to an unetched area and an irregular pattern occurred after electrolytic graining. Specimen No. 36 exhibited inferior pit uniformity due to high Mg content. Moreover, the amount of aluminum powder decreased, and coil scratches due to rubbing occurred. Specimen No. 37 was non-uniformly surface-roughened due to high Zn content. Specimen No. 38 had a small number of precipitates due to low Fe content and low Si content. The distribution of Al—Fe intermetallic compounds and Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compounds became non-uniform, whereby formation of pits became non-uniform due to formation of an unetched area. Moreover, since the quantity of Fe in solid solution was small, burning resistance was insufficient. Specimen No. 39 produced a large number of precipitates due to high Fe content and high Si content to produce coarse compounds. Therefore, uniformity of the surface-roughened structure decreased. Moreover, since the quantity of Fe in solid solution was large, the pit pattern became non-uniform. In specimen No. 40, an unetched area occurred during the electrolytic treatment due to high Cu content so that pits became large and non-uniform. Specimen No. 41 produced coarse Al—Ti compounds due to high Ti content, whereby the surface-roughened structure became non-uniform. Specimen No. 42 produced coarse Al—Fe—Mn compounds or Al—Fe—Mn—Si compounds due to high Mn content, whereby surface roughening during the electrolytic treatment became non-uniform. In specimen No. 43, the shape of pits was deformed and became non-uniform since the total amount of Pb, In, Sn, and Ga exceeded 0.05%.


Example 4 and Comparative Example 4

An ingot of an aluminum alloy B cast in Example 1 was subjected to scalping of rolling surface, homogenization, and hot rolling under conditions shown in Table 9. The hot-rolled product was cold-rolled to a thickness shown in Table 9 without being subjected to process annealing. The ingot was cooled to room temperature after the homogenization treatment, and was then heated to the hot rolling start temperature. Table 10 shows the surface roughness of a roll and the viscosity of a rolling oil used for cold rolling. In Tables 9 and 10, a value outside the condition according to the present invention is underlined.


The amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the sheet after cold rolling, the number of precipitates with a diameter of 0.1 to 1.0 μm, the quantity of Fe in solid solution, the number of oil pits with a diameter of 30 μm or more formed in the surface of the sheet, and the crystal grain size of the resulting aluminum alloy sheet (specimen) were measured according to the above-described methods. The results are shown in Table 10. Evaluation of burning resistance, observation of the presence or absence of scratches due to rubbing which occurred on a coil wound after cold rolling, an irregular pattern, and streaks, and evaluation of etching properties were conducted according to the above-described methods. The results are shown in Table 11.













TABLE 9









Homogenization treatment
Hot rolling




















Amount of
Temperature

Temperature
Start
Finish

Cold rolling





scalping
increase rate
Temperature
decrease rate
temperature
temperature
Sheet thickness
Sheet thickness


Specimen
Alloy
(mm/side)
(° C./hr)
(° C.)
(° C./hr)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(mm)
(mm)
Remarks





44
B
5
35
535
3
475
355
3
0.3
Example


45
B
5
44
455
10 
475
355
3
0.3
Example


46
B
5

10

550
5
475
355
3
0.3
Comparative












Example


47
B
5

80

580
2
475
355
3
0.3
Comparative












Example


48
B
5
38

405

3
475
355
3
0.3
Comparative












Example


49
B
5
30

615

3
475
355
3
0.3
Comparative












Example


50
B
5
33
553
  0.5
475
355
3
0.3
Comparative












Example



























TABLE 10













Number of












Quantity
oil pits with




Viscosity


Amount of

of
diameter



Ra
ρ of
Relationship I
Relationship II
aluminum

Fe in solid
of 30 μm
Crystal
Crystal



of roll
rolling oil
between
between
powder
Precipitate
solution
or more
length GL
width GT
Ratio


Specimen
(μm)
(cSt)
Mg and ρ
Mg and ρ
(mg/m2)
per mm2
(ppm)
(/mm2)
(μm)
(μm)
GL/GT


























44
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.38
55230 
26
50
735
73
10.1


45
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.80
69410 
21
40
843
90
9.4


46
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.71

9830


17

35
1120
98
11.4


47
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.67

3120


172

36
964
92
10.5


48
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.93

7040


116

38
900
89
10.1


49
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.40

3950


129

24
850
87
9.8


50
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.59

3760

30
21
671
63
10.7





Note:


Relationship I between Mg and ρ: −2 × Mg % + 2 ≦ ρ ≦ −2 × Mg % + 8 (satisfied: Good, not satisfied: Bad)


Relationship II between Mg and ρ: ρ ≦ 2 × Mg % + 4 (satisfied: Good, not satisfied: Bad)



















TABLE 11






Burning resistance







Specimen
(MPa)
Scratch
Unetched area
Pit uniformity
Irregular pattern
Streaks





















44
130
Excellent
Good
Good
Good
Good


45
122
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good


46
72
Good
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


47
123
Good
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


48
136
Excellent
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


49
140
Excellent
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


50
144
Good
Bad
Bad
Good
Good









As shown in Table 11, specimens No. 44 and No. 45 according to the present invention did not show scratches due to rubbing, exhibited excellent burning resistance, did not produce an irregular pattern and streaks, exhibited excellent etching properties after the electrolytic treatment, and had uniform etch pits over the entire surface. In specimen No. 46, since the temperature increase rate of the ingot during the homogenization treatment was low, the diameter of the precipitates exceeded 1 μm and the number of precipitates decreased. Therefore, an unetched area was formed so that uniformity of pits was poor. Moreover, since the amount of precipitation increased to a large extent, the quantity of Fe in solid solution became insufficient, whereby burning resistance decreased. In specimen No. 47, since the temperature increase rate of the ingot during the homogenization treatment was high, precipitation became insufficient, whereby the pit pattern became non-uniform due to formation of an unetched area during the electrolytic treatment. In specimen No. 48, since the homogenization treatment temperature was low, precipitation of Fe and Si (i.e., a reduction in the quantity of Fe and Si in solid solution) became insufficient, whereby the pit pattern became non-uniform due to formation of an unetched area during the electrolytic treatment. In specimen No. 49, since the homogenization treatment temperature was high, the quantity of Fe in solid solution increased. As a result, the number of minute precipitates which serve as pit starting points decreased. An unetched area was formed, and the pit pattern became non-uniform. In specimen No. 50, since the homogenization treatment time was short, the dissolution state of Fe and Si in the longitudinal direction and the width direction became non-uniform, whereby the pit pattern became non-uniform.


Example 5 and Comparative Example 5

Each rolling side of an ingot of an aluminum alloy (Table 1) cast in Example 1 was faced by 5 mm to reduce the thickness of the ingot to 500 mm. The ingot was heated to 530° C. at a temperature increase rate of 35° C./hr, and was then subjected to homogenization at 530° C. for 3.5 hours.


The temperature of the ingot was decreased to 490° C. (hot rolling start temperature) at a temperature decrease rate of 35° C./hr. The ingot was then hot-rolled to a thickness of 3 mm. Hot rolling was finished at 346° C. The hot-rolled product was cold-rolled to a thickness of 0.3 mm without being subjected to process annealing. The arithmetic average roughness Ra of a roll used for cold rolling was 0.3 μm, and the viscosity of a rolling oil was 3 cSt.


The amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the sheet after cold rolling, the number of precipitates with a diameter of 0.1 to 1.0 μm, the quantity of Fe in solid solution, the number of oil pits with a diameter of 30 μm or more formed in the surface of the sheet, and the crystal grain size of the resulting aluminum alloy sheet (specimen) were measured according to the above-described methods. The content (%) of Fe (Fe compound) which formed an intermetallic compound with respect to the total Fe content, the content (%) of Si (Si compound) which formed an intermetallic compound with respect to the total Si content, and the ratio (B %/A %) of the content (B %) of Fe which formed an Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compound to the content (A %) of Fe which formed an Al—Fe intermetallic compound were determined according to the following method. The results are shown in Table 12. Evaluation of burning resistance, observation of the presence or absence of scratches due to rubbing which occurred on a coil wound after cold rolling, an irregular pattern, and streaks, and evaluation of etching properties were conducted according to the above-described methods. The results are shown in Table 13. In FIG. 12, a value outside the condition according to the present invention is underlined.


Measurement of Fe content and Si content relating to intermetallic compound: The Fe content and the Si content of the total intermetallic compounds were determined using a phenol residue analysis method shown in FIG. 2. The ratio (Fe content (wt %) of Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compounds)/(Fe content (wt %) of Al—Fe intermetallic compounds) of the total intermetallic compounds was determined.

















TABLE 12









Viscosity




Quantity





ρ


Amount of

of Fe in




Ra
of rolling
Relationship
Relationship
aluminum

solid
Fe



of roll
oil
I between
II between
powder
Precipitate
solution
compound


Specimen
(μm)
(cSt)
Mg and ρ
Mg and ρ
(mg/m2)
(/mm2)
(ppm)
(%)





51
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.43
67430
53
98.3


52
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.91
30060
29
98.2


53
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.88
74600
61
97.8


54
0.3
3
Good
Good
0.20
62890
80
98.0


55
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.58
72650
40
98.8


56
0.3
3
Bad
Good

4.11

61120
33
98.9


57
0.3
3
Bad
Good

0.03

64210
27
98.9


58
0.3
3
Good
Good
0.26
59330
39
98.7


59
0.3
3
Good
Good

3.19

5300
13
97.8


60
0.3
3
Good
Good
0.99

139720


162

98.0


61
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.47
67940
31
99.0


62
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.81
58040
36
98.6


63
0.3
3
Good
Good
0.55
82180
92
97.5


64
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.51
61040
20
98.3





















Number of oil









pits with




Si

diameter of 30 μm
Crystal
Crystal




compound

or more
length GL
width GT
Ratio



Specimen
(%)
B %/A %
(/mm2)
(μm)
(μm)
GL/GT







51
20.0
0.23
38
661
64
10.3



52
23.3
0.27
47
820
77
10.6



53
17.8
0.38
33
634
68
9.3



54
35.7
0.43
6
679
63
10.8



55
34.3
0.53
42
632
58
10.9



56
18.3
0.21
71
733
66
11.1



57
20.0
0.24
3
756
79
9.6



58
31.4
0.51
13
727
78
9.3



59

60.0


0.93

49
1220

131

9.3



60
 7.1
0.10
23
529
47
11.3



61
32.9
0.58
45
603
60
10.1



62
12.3
0.44
30
601
60
10.0



63
22.0
0.17
19
588
55
10.7



64
10.0
0.78
33
1075
99
10.9







Note:



Relationship I between Mg and ρ: −2 × Mg % + 2 ≦ ρ ≦ −2 × Mg % + 8 (satisfied: Good, not satisfied: Bad)



Relationship II between Mg and ρ: ρ ≦ 2 × Mg % + 4 (satisfied: Good, not satisfied: Bad)



















TABLE 13






Burning resistance







Specimen
(MPa)
Scratch
Unetched area
Pit uniformity
Irregular pattern
Streaks





















51
155
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Good


52
140
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Good


53
162
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Good


54
220
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good


55
134
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good


56
90
Good
Bad
Bad
Bad
Good


57
233
Bad
Good
Bad
Good
Good


58
198
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


59
93
Good
Bad
Bad
Bad
Good


60
204
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


61
147
Good
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


62
186
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


63
199
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good


64
175
Good
Good
Bad
Good
Good









As shown in Table 13, specimens No. 51 to No. 55 according to the present invention did not show scratches due to rubbing, exhibited excellent burning resistance, did not produce an irregular pattern and streaks, exhibited excellent etching properties after the electrolytic treatment, and had uniform etch pits over the entire surface. On the other hand, specimen No. 56 exhibited inferior burning resistance due to low Mg content. Moreover, the amount of aluminum powder increased, and formation of pits became non-uniform. An inferior appearance due to an unetched area and an irregular pattern occurred after electrolytic graining. Specimen No. 57 exhibited inferior pit uniformity due to high Mg content. Moreover, the amount of aluminum powder decreased, and coil scratches due to rubbing occurred. Specimen No. 58 was non-uniformly surface-roughened due to high Zn content. Specimen No. 59 had a small number of precipitates due to low Fe content and low Si content. The distribution of Al—Fe intermetallic compounds and Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compounds became a non-uniform, whereby formation of pits became non-uniform due to formation of an unetched area. Moreover, since the quantity of Fe in solid solution was small, burning resistance was insufficient. Since the content of Fe which formed an intermetallic compound was more than 40% of the total Fe content, precipitation of Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compounds which serve as pit starting points to only a small extent proceeded so that large pits were formed due to a decrease in pit formation efficiency. As a result, the pit pattern became non-uniform. When the ratio (B %/A %) of the content (B %) of Fe which forms an Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compound to the content (A %) of Fe which forms an Al—Fe intermetallic compound is larger than 0.9, large pits tend to be formed due to a decrease in pit formation efficiency. Specimen No. 60 produced a large number of precipitates due to high Fe content and high Si content to produce coarse compounds. Therefore, uniformity of the surface-roughened structure decreased. Moreover, since the quantity of Fe in solid solution was large, the pit pattern became non-uniform. In specimen No. 61, an unetched area occurred during the electrolytic treatment due to high Cu content so that pits became large and non-uniform. Specimen No. 62 produced coarse Al—Ti compounds due to high Ti content, whereby the surface-roughened structure became non-uniform. Specimen No. 63 produced coarse Al—Fe—Mn compounds or Al—Fe—Mn—Si compounds due to high Mn content, whereby surface roughening during the electrolytic treatment became non-uniform. In specimen No. 64, the shape of pits was deformed and became non-uniform since the total amount of Pb, In, Sn, and Ga exceeded 0.05%.


Example 6 and Comparative Example 6

An ingot of an aluminum alloy C cast in Example 1 was subjected to scalping of rolling surface, homogenization, and hot rolling under conditions shown in Table 14. The hot-rolled product was cold-rolled to a thickness shown in Table 14 without being subjected to process annealing. The ingot was cooled to room temperature after the homogenization treatment, and was then heated to the hot rolling start temperature. Table 15 shows the surface roughness of a roll and the viscosity of a rolling oil used for cold rolling. In Tables 14 and 15, a value outside the condition according to the present invention is underlined.


The amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the sheet after cold rolling, the number of precipitates with a diameter of 0.1 to 1.0 μm, the quantity of Fe in solid solution, the content (%) of Fe (Fe compound) which formed an intermetallic compound with respect to the total Fe content, the content (%) of Si (Si compound) which formed an intermetallic compound with respect to the total Si content, and the ratio (B %/A %) of the content (B %) of Fe which formed an Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compound to the content (A %) of Fe which formed an Al—Fe intermetallic compound, the number of oil pits with a diameter of 30 μm or more formed in the surface of the sheet, the crystal grain size, the content of Fe which formed an intermetallic compound, the content of Si which formed an intermetallic compound, and the ratio of the content of Fe which formed an Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compound to the content of Fe which formed an Al—Fe intermetallic compound of the resulting aluminum alloy sheet (specimen) were measured according to the above-described methods. The results are shown in Table 15. Evaluation of burning resistance, observation of the presence or absence of scratches due to rubbing which occurred on a coil wound after cold rolling, an irregular pattern, and streaks, and evaluation of etching properties were conducted according to the above-described methods. The results are shown in Table 18.














TABLE 14









Homogenization treatment
Hot rolling
Cold rolling





















Amount of
Temperature


Temperature
Start
Finish
Sheet
Sheet





scalping
increase rate
Temperature
Time
decrease rate
temperature
temperature
thickness
thickness


Specimen
Alloy
(mm/side)
(° C./hr)
(° C.)
(hr)
(° C./hr)
(° C.)
(° C.)
(mm)
(mm)
Remarks





65
C
5
35
535
3
35
465
343
3
0.3
Example


66
C
5
35
455
10 
44
465
343
3
0.3
Example


67
C
5
35

405

5
30
465
343
3
0.3
Comparative













Example


68
C
5
35

615

2
33
465
343
3
0.3
Comparative













Example


69
C
5
35
550
  0.5
38
465
343
3
0.3
Comparative













Example


70
C
5
35
580
3

10

465
343
3
0.3
Comparative













Example


71
C
5
35
553

3


80

465
343
3
0.3
Comparative













Example























TABLE 15














Quantity




Viscosity ρ


Amount of

of Fe in




of rolling
Relationship
Relationship
aluminum

solid



Ra of roll
oil
I between
II between
powder
Precipitate
solution


Specimen
(μm)
(cSt)
Mg and ρ
Mg and ρ
(mg/m2)
(/mm2)
(ppm)





65
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.98
73240 
24


66
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.41
88780 
31


67
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.29

7330


120



68
0.3
3
Good
Good
1.26

3420


168



69
0.3
3
Good
Good
2.55

4040

55


70
0.3
3
Bad
Good
2.00

9650

19


71
0.3
3
Bad
Good
0.98

8870

80





















Number of oil









pits with



Fe
Si

diameter of 30 μm
Crystal
Crystal



compound
compound

or more
length GL
width GT
Ratio


Specimen
(%)
(%)
B %/A %
(/mm2)
(μm)
(μm)
GL/GT





65
99.1
13.3
0.26
30
514
53
9.7


66
98.9
21.1
0.48
25
875
90
9.7


67
95.7
33.3

1.12

19
1130

108

10.5


68
94.0
8.9
0.17
16
836
82
10.2


69
98.0
10.0
0.18
20
713
66
10.8


70
99.3
32.2

0.97

14
850
87
9.8


71
97.1
8.9
0.16
10
547
52
10.5





Note:


Relationship I between Mg and ρ: −2 × Mg % + 2 ≦ ρ ≦ −2 × Mg % + 8 (satisfied: Good, not satisfied: Bad)


Relationship II between Mg and ρ: ρ ≦ 2 × Mg % + 4 (satisfied: Good, not satisfied: Bad)



















TABLE 16






Burning resistance







Specimen
(MPa)
Scratch
Unetched area
Pit uniformity
Irregular pattern
Streaks





















65
148
Excellent
Good
Good
Good
Good


66
123
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good


67
140
Good
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


68
145
Good
Bad
Bad
Good
Good


69
137
Excellent
Good
Bad
Good
Good


70
79
Excellent
Good
Bad
Good
Good


71
126
Good
Bad
Bad
Good
Bad









As shown in Table 16, specimens No. 65 and No. 66 according to the present invention did not show scratches due to rubbing, exhibited excellent burning resistance, did not produce an irregular pattern and streaks, exhibited excellent etching properties after the electrolytic treatment, and had uniform etch pits over the entire surface. In specimen No. 67, since the homogenization treatment temperature was low, precipitation of Fe and Si which serve as pit starting points was insufficient so that an unetched area was formed during the electrolytic treatment. As a result, the pit pattern became non-uniform. In specimen No. 68, since the homogenization treatment temperature was high, the quantity of Fe in solid solution increased. As a result, the number of minutes precipitates which serve as pit starting points decreased. An unetched area was formed, and the pit pattern became non-uniform. In specimen No. 69, since the homogenization treatment time was short, precipitation of Fe and Si became insufficient, whereby the pit pattern became non-uniform. In specimen No. 70, since the temperature decrease rate of the ingot to the hot rolling start temperature after the homogenization treatment was low, precipitation of Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compounds proceeded, whereby the diameter of the precipitates exceeded 1 μm and the number of precipitates decreased. Moreover, the quantity of Fe in solid solution decreased. As a result, burning resistance became insufficient, and pits became non-uniform. In specimen No. 71, since the temperature decrease rate of the ingot to the hot rolling start temperature after the homogenization treatment was high, the period of time for precipitation was insufficient. Moreover, since the temperature of the ingot became non-uniform, precipitation of Fe and Si also became non-uniform. As a result, recrystallization during the subsequent hot rolling became non-uniform, whereby streaks occurred. In addition, the pit pattern became non-uniform.


INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

According to the present invention, an aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate which allows pits to be more uniformly formed by an electrochemical surface-roughening treatment, exhibits more excellent adhesion to a photosensitive film and water retention properties, and shows excellent strength and thermal softening resistance which achieve improved image clarity and plate wear, and a method of producing the same are provided.

Claims
  • 1. An aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate, the aluminum alloy sheet comprising 0.1 to 1.5% (mass %; hereinafter the same) of Mg, 0.5% or less (excluding 0%; hereinafter the same) of Zn, 0.1 to 0.6% of Fe, 0.03 to 0.15% of Si, 0.0001 to 0.1% of Cu, and 0.0001 to 0.1% of Ti, with the balance being aluminum and impurities, the amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet being 0.1 to 3.0 mg/mm2.
  • 2. An aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate, the aluminum alloy sheet comprising 0.1 to 1.5% of Mg, more than 0.05% and 0.5% or less of Zn, 0.1 to 0.6% of Fe, 0.03 to 0.15% of Si, 0.0001 to 0.10% of Cu, and 0.0001 to 0.05% of Ti, with the balance being aluminum and impurities, the Mg content and the Zn content of the aluminum alloy sheet satisfying a relationship “4×Zn %−1.4%≦Mg %≦4×Zn %+0.6%”, and the amount of aluminum powder on the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet being 0.1 to 3.0 mg/m2.
  • 3. The aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 2, wherein precipitates with a diameter (circle equivalent diameter) of 0.1 to 1.0 μm are dispersed on the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet in a number of 10,000 to 100,000 per square millimeter (mm2).
  • 4. The aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 2, wherein the quantity of Fe in solid solution in the aluminum alloy sheet is 20 to 100 ppm.
  • 5. The aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 2, wherein some or all of the elements of the aluminum alloy sheet form intermetallic compounds, the content of Fe which forms an intermetallic compound is 50 to 99.8% of the total Fe content, the content of Si which forms an intermetallic compound is 5 to 40% of the total Si content, and the ratio (B %/A %) of the content (B %) of Fe which forms an Al—Fe—Si intermetallic compound to the content (A %) of Fe which forms an Al—Fe intermetallic compound is 0.9 or less.
  • 6. The aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 1, wherein the number of oil pits with a diameter (circle equivalent diameter) of 30 μm or more formed in the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet is 50 or less per square millimeter (mm2).
  • 7. The aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 1, wherein the aluminum alloy sheet further comprises more than 0.05% and 0.3% or less of Mn.
  • 8. The aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 1, wherein the average grain size of the aluminum alloy sheet in a direction perpendicular to a rolling direction with respect to the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet is 100 μm or less, and the average grain size in a direction parallel to the rolling direction with respect to the surface of the aluminum alloy sheet is 2 to 20 times the average grain size in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction.
  • 9. The aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 1, wherein the aluminum alloy sheet further comprises one or more elements selected from Pb, In, Sn, and Ga in an amount of 0.005 to 0.05% in total.
  • 10. The aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 3, wherein the aluminum alloy sheet has a 0.2% proof stress of 120 MPa or more after being subjected to a heat treatment at 270° C. for seven minutes.
  • 11. A method of producing an aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate, the method comprising casting an aluminum alloy having the composition according to claim 2 to obtain an ingot, scalping a rolling-side surface of the ingot by 3 to 15 mm, subjecting the ingot to a homogenization treatment which includes heating the ingot to 450 to 580° C. at a temperature increase rate of 20 to 60° C./hr and keeping the ingot at 450 to 580° C. for one hour or more, hot-rolling the resulting product to a thickness of 5 mm or less under conditions where the hot rolling start temperature is 400 to 520° C. and the hot rolling finish temperature is 320 to 400° C., and cold-rolling the hot-rolled product without subjecting the hot-rolled product to process annealing.
  • 12. A method of producing an aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate, the method comprising casting an aluminum alloy having the composition according to claim 2 to obtain an ingot, scalping a rolling-side surface of the ingot by 3 to 15 mm, subjecting the ingot to a homogenization treatment which includes heating the ingot to 450 to 580° C. at a temperature increase rate of 20 to 60° C./hr and keeping the ingot at 450 to 580° C. for one hour or more, cooling the resulting product to room temperature, heating the cooled product to 350 to 500° C. and hot-rolling the product to a thickness of 5 mm or less under conditions where the hot rolling finish temperature is 300 to 380° C., and cold-rolling the hot-rolled product without subjecting the hot-rolled product to process annealing.
  • 13. A method of producing an aluminum alloy sheet for a lithographic printing plate, the method comprising casting an aluminum alloy having the composition according to claim 2 to obtain an ingot, scalping a rolling-side surface of the ingot by 3 to 15 mm, subjecting the ingot to a homogenization treatment which includes heating the ingot to 450 to 580° C. and keeping the ingot at 450 to 580° C. for three hours or more, cooling the resulting product to a hot rolling start temperature at a temperature decrease rate of 20 to 60° C./hr, hot-rolling the cooled product to a thickness of 5 mm or less under conditions where the hot rolling start temperature is 400 to 500° C. and the hot rolling finish temperature is 300 to 400° C., and cold-rolling the hot-rolled product without subjecting the hot-rolled product to process annealing.
  • 14. A method of producing the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 1, the method comprising subjecting the aluminum alloy sheet to final cold rolling using a rolling oil with a viscosity of 1 to 6 cSt.
  • 15. A method of producing the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 1, the method comprising subjecting the aluminum alloy sheet to final cold rolling using a rolling oil, the Mg content (Mg %) of the aluminum alloy sheet and the viscosity p of the rolling oil satisfying a relationship “−2×Mg %+2≦ρ≦−2×Mg %+8”.
  • 16. A method of producing the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 6, the method comprising subjecting the aluminum alloy sheet to final cold rolling using a roll having a roll surface with an arithmetic average roughness Ra of 0.2 to 0.5 μm and a rolling oil with a viscosity of 1 to cSt.
  • 17. A method of producing the aluminum alloy sheet according to claim 6, the method comprising subjecting the aluminum alloy sheet to final cold rolling using a rolling oil, the Mg content (Mg %) of the aluminum alloy sheet and the viscosity p of the rolling oil satisfying a relationship “ρ≦2×Mg+4”.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/JP2006/316437 8/16/2006 WO 00 2/22/2008