Patent Grant
7592280
This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from a Japanese Patent Application No. TOKUGAN 2006-078689, filed on Mar. 22, 2006; the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an aluminum nitride sintered body and a method of manufacturing the same.
2. Description of the Related Art
As is conventionally known, when an aluminum nitride sintered body is polished, a degree of flatness in the order of several tens of nanometers is difficult to obtain. The present inventors thought that the flatness was difficult to obtain because aluminum nitride grains fall off during polishing. As a result of intensive researches, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2005-029458, they have found that fall-off of aluminum nitride grains can be suppressed by increasing the strength of a grain boundary and reducing the diameter of the aluminum nitride grains. In addition, the inventors have found that the strength of the grain boundary can be improved by adding SiO2 to an aluminum nitride sintered body, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2005-029458.
However, when SiO2 was added to an aluminum nitride sintered body, the diameters of aluminum nitride grains are likely to increase. Therefore, improvements of grain-boundary strength and reduction of aluminum nitride grains in size are not achieved at the same time. Furthermore, when an amount of an sintering additives such as SiO2 is large, a grain boundary phase is generated. Since aluminum nitride grains and the grain boundary phase are ground at different rates, dimples are formed at the grain boundary phase. For this reason, the flatness could not be improved. Under these technical circumstances, it has been desired to provide an aluminum nitride sintered body excellent in flatness, that is, having a degree of flatness in the order of several tens of nanometers, by polishing.
The present invention has been achieved in order to solve the aforementioned problem, and an object of the invention is to provide an aluminum nitride sintered body excellent in flatness by polishing, a method of manufacturing the aluminum nitride sintered body, and a member.
The present inventors considered that the flatness of an aluminum nitride sintered body by polishing can be improved by enhancing the strength of the grain boundary, reducing aluminum nitride grains in size, and reducing the grain boundary phase. As the result of intensive researches, the inventors have found that an aluminum nitride sintered body excellent in flatness by polishing can be provided by enhancing the strength of the grain boundary; at the same time, by adding SiO2 (silicon dioxide) or MgO (magnesium oxide), which forms a solid solution with aluminum nitride during a sintering process, with the result that it is no longer present as a grain boundary phase, in a small amount to an aluminum nitride powder, followed by sintering the aluminum nitride powder at a low temperature from more than 1600° C. to less than 1750° C.
A feature of an aluminum nitride sintered body according to a first aspect of the present invention obtained from these findings resides in that a crystal grain diameter is 2.0 μm or less, the crystalline phase detected by an X-ray diffractometer is an AlN phase only or an AlN phase and an AlON phase only, and SiO2 or MgO is contained in an amount of more than 0.05 wt % to less than 1 wt %. Furthermore, a feature of an aluminum nitride sintered body according to a second aspect of the present invention resides in that a surface roughness is 100 nm or less (in this specification, the term “surface roughness” refers to a maximum height Rt of a section thereof).
Note that the aluminum nitride sintered body is desirably produced by sintering an aluminum nitride powder in the temperature range of more than 1600° C. to less than 1750° C. The average crystal grain diameter of the aluminum nitride powder is desirably 2.0 μm or less and more preferably within the range of 0.5 μm to 1.0 μm. Furthermore, at least one part of a member for a semiconductor manufacturing device such as an electrostatic chuck and a mold for forming a precision member or the like can be formed of the aluminum nitride sintered body.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing. Understanding that this drawing depicts only exemplary embodiments and is, therefore, not to be considered limiting of the invention's scope, the exemplary embodiments of the invention will be described with additional specificity and detail through use of the accompanying drawing in which:
Embodiments of a method of manufacturing an aluminum nitride sintered body according to the present invention will be explained below.
In Example 1, first, to 100 parts by weight of an aluminum nitride powder having an average particle diameter of 0.7 μm, 0.5 parts by weight of MgO was added and mixed by a pot mill or a ball mill to prepare a powder mixture according to Example 1. Note that mixing can be performed in either a wet or dry state. When mixing is performed in a wet state, a dry process is performed after mixing to prepare a powder mixture. After the preparation of the powder mixture was completed, the powder mixture was granulated directly as it was or after adding a binder and formed to obtain a disk-shaped product. A forming method is not particularly limited and various methods including die pressing, CIP (Cold Isostatic Pressing) and slip casting can be used. The formed product was then sintered at 1650° C. for 4 hours by a hot press process or a sintering process under normal pressure to obtain an aluminum nitride sintered body according to Example 1. When the average diameter of the aluminum nitride grains in the aluminum nitride sintered body of Example 1 was determined, it was 0.7 μm. Furthermore, when the crystal phase of the aluminum nitride sintered body of Example 1 was determined by an x-ray diffractometer, the aluminum nitride sintered body was constituted of an AlN phase and an AlON phase.
In Example 2, first, to 100 parts by weight of an aluminum nitride powder having an average particle diameter of 0.7 (μm), 0.1 part by weight of SiO2 was added and mixed by a pot mill or a ball mill to prepare a powder mixture according to Example 2. Thereafter, the same process as in Example 1 was performed to obtain an aluminum nitride sintered body according to Example 2. When the average diameter of the aluminum nitride grains in the aluminum nitride sintered body of Example 2 was determined, it was 1.0 μm. Furthermore, when the crystal phase of the aluminum nitride sintered body of Example 2 was determined by an X-ray diffractometer, the aluminum nitride sintered body was constituted of an AlN phase and an AlON phase.
In Example 3, first, to 100 parts by weight of an aluminum nitride powder having an average particle diameter of 0.7 (μm), 0.5 part by weight of SiO2 was added and mixed by a pot mill or a ball mill to prepare a powder mixture according to Example 3. Thereafter, the same process as in Example 1 was performed to obtain an aluminum nitride sintered body according to Example 3. When the average diameter of the aluminum nitride grains in the aluminum nitride sintered body of Example 3 was determined, it was 0.7 μm. Furthermore, when the crystal phase of the aluminum nitride sintered body of Example 3 was determined by an X-ray diffractometer, the aluminum nitride sintered body was constituted of an AlN phase and an AlON phase.
In Example 4, the same process as in Example 1 was performed except that a sintering temperature was changed from 1650° C. to 1700° C. to obtain an aluminum nitride sintered body according to Example 4. When the average diameter of the aluminum nitride grains in the aluminum nitride sintered body of Example 4 was determined, it was 1.2 μm. Furthermore, when the crystal phase of the aluminum nitride sintered body of Example 4 was determined by an X-ray diffractometer, the aluminum nitride sintered body was constituted of an AlN phase and an AlON phase.
In Example 5, the same process as in Example 2 was performed except that a sintering temperature was changed from 1650° C. to 1700° C. to obtain an aluminum nitride sintered body according to Example 5. When the average diameter of the aluminum nitride grains in the aluminum nitride sintered body of Example 5 was determined, it was 1.4 μm. Furthermore, when the crystal phase of the aluminum nitride sintered body of Example 5 was determined by an X-ray diffractometer, the aluminum nitride sintered body was constituted of an AlN phase and an AlON phase.
In Example 6, the same process as in Example 3 was performed except that a sintering temperature was changed from 1650° C. to 1700° C. to obtain an aluminum nitride sintered body according to Example 6. When the average diameter of the aluminum nitride grains in the aluminum nitride sintered body of Example 6 was determined, it was 1.4 μm. Furthermore, when the crystal phase of the aluminum nitride sintered body of Example 6 was determined by an X-ray diffractometer, the aluminum nitride sintered body was constituted of an AlN phase and an AlON phase.
In Comparative Example 1, an aluminum nitride powder was granulated directly as it was or after adding a binder and formed into a disk-shaped product. The formed product was sintered at 1700° C. for 4 hours by a hot press process or a sintering process under normal pressure to obtain an aluminum nitride sintered body according to Comparative Example 1. When the average diameter of the aluminum nitride grains in the aluminum nitride sintered body of Comparative Example 1 was determined, it was 1.1 μm. Furthermore, when the crystal phase of the aluminum nitride sintered body of Comparative Example 1 was determined by an X-ray diffractometer, the aluminum nitride sintered body was constituted of an AlN phase and an AlON phase.
In Comparative Example 2, first, to 100 parts by weight of an aluminum nitride powder having an average particle diameter of 0.7 μm, 0.5 μparts by weight of Y2O3 was added and mixed by a pot mill or a ball mill to prepare a powder mixture according to Comparative Example 2. Thereafter, the same process as in Example 1 was performed to obtain an aluminum nitride sintered body according to Comparative Example 2. When the average diameter of the aluminum nitride grains in the aluminum nitride sintered body of Comparative Example 2 was determined, it was 1.6 μm. Furthermore, when the crystal phase of the aluminum nitride sintered body of Comparative Example 2 was determined by an X-ray diffractometer, the aluminum nitride sintered body was constituted of an AlN phase, an AlON phase, and a YAG (Y3Al5O12) phase.
In Comparative Example 3, the same process as in Comparative Example 2 was performed except that a sintering temperature was changed from 1650° C. to 1700° C. to obtain an aluminum nitride sintered body according to Comparative Example 3. When the average diameter of the aluminum nitride grains in the aluminum nitride sintered body of Comparative Example 3 was determined, it was 2.2 μm. Furthermore, when the crystal phase of the aluminum nitride sintered body of Comparative Example 3 was determined by an X-ray diffractometer, the aluminum nitride sintered body was constituted of an AlN phase, an AlON phase, and a YAG phase.
In Comparative Example 4, first, to 100 parts by weight of an aluminum nitride powder having an average particle diameter of 0.7 μm, 2.0 parts by weight of SiO2 was added and mixed by a pot mill or a ball mill to prepare a powder mixture according to Comparative Example 4. Thereafter, the same process as in Comparative Example 3 was performed to obtain an aluminum nitride sintered body according to Comparative Example 4. When the average diameter of the aluminum nitride grains in the aluminum nitride sintered body of Comparative Example 4 was determined, it was 1.0 μm. Furthermore, when the crystal phase of the aluminum nitride sintered body of Comparative Example 4 was determined by an X-ray diffractometer, the aluminum nitride sintered body was constituted of an AlN phase and an SiAl7O2N7 phase.
In Comparative Example 5, first, to 100 parts by weight of an aluminum nitride powder having an average particle diameter of 0.7 μm, 5.0 parts by weight of Y2O3 was added and mixed by a pot mill or a ball mill to prepare a powder mixture according to Comparative Example 5. Thereafter, the same process as in Comparative Example 3 was performed to obtain an aluminum nitride sintered body according to Comparative Example 5. When the average diameter of the aluminum nitride grains in the aluminum nitride sintered body of Comparative Example 5 was determined, it was 4.0 μm. Furthermore, when the crystal phase of the aluminum nitride sintered body of Comparative Example 5 was determined by an X-ray diffractometer, the aluminum nitride sintered body was constituted of an AlN phase, a YAL (YAlO3) phase, and a YAM(Y4Al2O9) phase.
[Evaluation Method]
The flatness of each of the aluminum nitride sintered bodies of Examples and Comparative Examples by polishing was evaluated by counting the number of fallen off particles by polishing (count/mm2), the surface roughness (Rt,nm), and the number of particles (count) per 50 mm2. Note that the number of fallen off particles by polishing (count/mm2), the surface roughness (Rt, nm), and the number of particles (count) per 50 mm2 were determined by the methods described below.
[Method of Counting the Number of Fallen Off Particles by Polishing]
One of the surfaces of each of the aluminum nitride sintered bodies according to Examples and Comparative Examples was polished by a diamond (#400) grindstone, followed by a copper rubbing machine on which slurry containing diamond grains having 9 μm and 3 μm in diameter was dropped. The number of fallen off aluminum nitride particles from the polishing surface was counted by observing two points (an area of 4 mm2) of the center and edge portion of the polished surface under an SEM. The count of the particles thus obtained was divided by 4 mm2 to calculate the number of particles by polishing.
[Method of Measuring Surface Roughness]
One of the surfaces of each of the aluminum nitride sintered bodies according to Examples and Comparative Examples was polished by a diamond (#400) grindstone, followed by a copper rubbing machine on which slurry containing diamond grains having 9 μm and 3 μm in diameter was dropped, and then, by a buffing machine on which slurry containing diamond grains of 1 μm in diameter was dropped for 270 minutes. Thereafter, the surface roughness was determined.
[Method of Measuring the Number of Particles]
The number of particles was counted by adsorbing an Si wafer using an aluminum nitride sintered body of each of Examples and Comparative Examples as an electrostatic chuck and counting the number of fallen off aluminum nitride particles on the Si wafer. More specifically, in a closable chamber for a measurement test, a plate-type ceramic heater 40 for controlling the temperature as shown in
[Evaluation Results]
With respect to each of the aluminum nitride sintered bodies of Examples and Comparative Examples, the number of fallen off particles by polishing and the number of particles per 50 mm2 were measured. The results are shown in Table 1.
When the aluminum nitride sintered bodies of Examples 1 to 6 are compared to those of Comparative Examples 2, 3, and 5, the number of fallen off particles by polishing and the number of particles are smaller in the aluminum nitride sintered bodies of Examples 1 to 6 than those of Comparative Examples 2, 3, and 5. Furthermore, when the aluminum nitride sintered bodies of Examples 1 to 6 are compared to those of Comparative Examples 1 to 5, it is apparent that the surface roughness values of those of Comparative Examples 1 to 5 are larger than those of Examples 1 to 6. From this arrangement, it is found that an aluminum nitride sintered body having no grain boundary phase, which is processed at a different rate from aluminum nitride grains and suppressed in fallen off aluminum nitride particles during polishing and improved in flatness by polishing the aluminum nitride sintered body, can be obtained by constituting the aluminum sintered body of an AlN phase and AlON phase only.
When aluminum nitride sintered bodies of Examples 1 to 6, are compared to those of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 and 5, it is apparent that the number of fallen off particles by polishing and the number of particles in the aluminum nitride sintered bodies of Examples 1 to 6 are smaller than in those of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 and 5. From this arrangement, it is found that the strength of grain boundary is improved, falling-off of aluminum nitride particles during polishing can be suppressed, and the flatness of the aluminum sintered body by polishing can be improved by adding SiO2 or MgO.
Furthermore, when aluminum nitride sintered bodies of Examples 5 and 6 are compared to that of Comparative Examples 4, it is apparent that the number of fallen off particles by polishing and the number of particles are smaller in the aluminum nitride sintered bodies of Examples 5 and 6 than in that of Comparative Example 4. From this arrangement, it is found that the falling-off of aluminum nitride particles during polishing can be suppressed in the case where the addition amount of SiO2 is small. The reason why the aluminum nitride sintered bodies in Examples 1 to 6 have a smaller number of particles can be conceived that, since the surface roughness is as small as 100 nm or less, bumps of particles do not become stuck to an Si wafer, and accordingly particles do not drop out.
The present invention is not limited to the description and the drawings which constitute a part of the disclosure of the present invention according to the embodiment. Specifically, it may be added that, needless to say, other embodiments, examples, operational technologies and the like, which are made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiment, are all included in the scope of the present invention.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-078689 | Mar 2006 | JP | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5767028 | Komatsu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 7288496 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7422992 | Teratani et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 20050013761 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20060217259 | Teratani et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2005-029458 | Feb 2005 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070225152 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |
