TREA

Aluminum sheet with enhanced formability and an aluminum container made from aluminum sheet

Follow

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10022773
  • Patent Number
    10,022,773
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 22, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 17, 2018
    6 years ago
Information
Abstract
In some embodiments of present disclosure, a method includes: obtaining an aluminum sheet comprising a 3xxx or a 5xxx alloy having a tensile yield strength as measured in the longitudinal direction of 27-33 ksi and an ultimate tensile strength; wherein the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is less than 3.30 ksi (UTS-TYS<3.30 ksi); and forming a container having a dome from the aluminum sheet.
Description
BACKGROUND

In the container industry, substantially identically shaped metal beverage containers are produced massively and relatively economically. In order to expand a diameter of a container to create a shaped container or enlarge the diameter of the entire container, often several operations are required using several different expansion dies to expand each metal container a desired amount. Also, dies have been used to neck and shape the containers. Often several operations are required using several different necking dies to narrow each metal container a desired amount. Open ends of containers are formed by flanging, curling, threading and/or other operations to accept closures. Necking, expanding, shaping, and finishing operations sometimes cause metal failures, such as one or more of the following: curl splits, container fracture, container collapse.


SUMMARY

Referring to FIG. 1, an aluminum sheet 100 comprises a AA 3XXX or a 5xxx alloy having a tensile yield strength (TYS) as measured in the longitudinal direction of 27-33 ksi and an ultimate tensile strength (UTS); wherein the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is less than 3.30 ksi (UTS-TYS<3.30 ksi). In some embodiments, the tensile yield strength as measured in the longitudinal direction is 28-32 ksi. In some embodiments, the tensile yield strength as measured in the longitudinal direction is 28.53-31.14 ksi. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is 2.90-3.30 ksi. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is 2.99-3.30 ksi. In some embodiments, the aluminum sheet comprises one of AA: 3x03, 3x04 or 3x05. In some embodiments, the aluminum sheet comprises AA 3104. In some embodiments, the aluminum sheet comprises AA 5043. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength is 30-36 ksi. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength is 31-35 ksi. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength is 31.51-34.51 ksi.


In some embodiments, the TYS and (UTS-TYS) values described above are for an aluminum sheet coil “as shipped” to a can maker. The container forming process performed by the can maker includes thermal treatments and mechanical processes, i.e. cold working, both of which affect the TYS and (UTS-TYS) values. The TYS and (UTS-TYS) values of a particular container will vary depending on the thermal treatments and mechanical processes used to form the container and the TYS and (UTS-TYS) values will vary along various points on a single container. For example, sidewalls of a container generally have a lot of cold work, which will result in higher TYS. Heat treatments generally lower TYS. The dome of a container will experience heat treatments but little cold work so the TYS of the dome of a formed container made with sheet described above may be slightly lower than the TYS of the sheet described above.


Referring to FIG. 2, an aluminum container 200 has a dome 210, wherein the dome 210 comprises a AA 3XXX or a 5XXX alloy having a tensile yield strength as measured in the longitudinal direction of 27-33 ksi and an ultimate tensile strength; wherein the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is less than 3.30 ksi (UTS-TYS<3.30 ksi). In some embodiments, the tensile yield strength as measured in the longitudinal direction is 28-32 ksi. In some embodiments, the tensile yield strength as measured in the longitudinal direction is 28.53-31.14 ksi. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is 2.90-3.30 ksi. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is 2.99-3.30 ksi. In some embodiments, dome 210 comprises one of AA: 3x03, 3x04 or 3x05. In some embodiments, the dome 210 comprises AA 3104. In some embodiments, the dome 210 comprises AA 5043. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength is 30-36 ksi. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength is 31-35 ksi. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength is 31.51-34.51 ksi. In some embodiments, the aluminum container is a bottle. In some embodiments, the aluminum container has been formed by drawing and ironing an aluminum sheet.


Referring to FIG. 3, a method comprises: forming a container 300 from an aluminum sheet comprising a 3XXX or a 5xxx alloy having a tensile yield strength as measured in the longitudinal direction of 27-33 ksi and an ultimate tensile strength; wherein the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is less than 3.30 ksi (UTS-TYS<3.30 ksi); and reducing a diameter of a portion of the container 310 by at least 26%.


Referring to FIG. 4, in some embodiments, reducing a diameter of the container 310 by at least 26% comprises necking the container 320 with necking dies. In some embodiments, reducing the diameter of the container 310 by at least 26% comprises necking the container 320 at least 14 times. In some embodiments, the diameter of the container is reduced by at least 30%.


In some embodiments, the tensile yield strength as measured in the longitudinal direction is 28-32 ksi. In some embodiments, the tensile yield strength as measured in the longitudinal direction is 28.53-31.14 ksi. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is 2.90-3.30 ksi. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is 2.99-3.30 ksi. In some embodiments, the aluminum sheet comprises one of AA: 3x03, 3x04 or 3x05. In some embodiments, the aluminum sheet comprises AA 3104. In some embodiments, the aluminum sheet comprises AA 5043. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength is 30-36 ksi. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength is 31-35 ksi. In some embodiments, the ultimate tensile strength is 31.51-34.51 ksi.


In some embodiments, the container is a bottle.


Referring to FIG. 5, in some embodiments, the method further comprises expanding a section of the portion of the container having a reduced diameter 330. In some embodiments, the section has a length and the length is at least 0.3 inches. In some embodiments, the length is at least 0.4 inches.


An aluminum sheet is rolled aluminum having a thickness of 0.006 inch to 0.030 inch.


A dome is the dome at the bottom of the container.


A bottle is a rigid container having a neck that is narrower than the body.


The tensile yield strength is defined as the load at 0.2% offset yield divided by the original cross sectional area of the specimen. The ultimate tensile strength is the maximum load divided by the original cross sectional area.


The alloys and tempers mentioned herein are as defined by the American National Standard Alloy and Temper Designation System for Aluminum ANSI H35.1 and “the Aluminum Association International Alloy Designations and Chemical Composition Limits for Wrought Aluminum and Wrought Aluminum Alloys as revised February 2009.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a partial enlarged perspective view of an aluminum sheet;



FIG. 2 is a side view of an aluminum bottle having a dome;



FIG. 3 depicts process steps according to one embodiment;



FIG. 4 depicts process steps according to another embodiment;



FIG. 5 depicts process steps according to a further embodiment;



FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the UTS of groups of coils 1-4;



FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating the TYS of groups of coils 1-4;



FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating the UTS-TYS of groups of coils 1-4; and



FIG. 9 plots low and high reject rate coils verses UTS-TYS.





DESCRIPTION

The formability of can bottle stock (as measured by reject rate after finishing the opening of the container) has been empirically demonstrated to increase with reduced (<3.30 ksi) UTS-TYS difference. UTS-TYS differences of <3.30 ksi have resulted in less product rejects. Specimens measured were made from finished gauge sheet with a nominal width of ˜0.50″. The samples were oriented such that the rolling direction is parallel to the applied load.


In some embodiments, finishing comprises one or a combination of the following: forming threads, expanding, narrowing, curling, flanging, or forming the opening of the container to accept a closure. Bottles made from coils of aluminum sheet with UTS-TYS<3.30 ksi have lower reject rates after finishing. Rejection can be caused by container failures, such as one or more of the following: curl splits, container fracture, container collapse. Other types of container failures may cause rejection.


One method to produce reduced UTS-TYS difference bottle stock sheet is a reduction in Ti level and an increase in preheat soak time from standard production targets. In some embodiments, the Ti levels in the aluminum sheet are in the range of 0.0030-0.008 wt %. In some embodiments, the aluminum sheet experiences presoak times in the range of 3 hours at 1080° F. plus 30-40 hours at 1060° F. In some embodiments, the aluminum sheet experiences presoak times in the range of 3 hours at 1080° F. plus 35-40 hours at 1060° F. In some embodiments, the aluminum sheet experiences presoak times in the range of 3 hours at 1080° F. plus 37-40 hours at 1060° F.


Aluminum sheet (10 coils) having an average TYS of ˜35.35 ksi (range 34.38-36.18 ksi) with UTS-TYS average of 3.47 ksi (range 3.30-3.80 ksi) are in group 1. The average UTS of group 1 was 38.89 ksi (range 38.09-39.49 ksi). The material in group 1 lacked sufficient formability to be used in the manufacture of bottles.


Coils of aluminum sheets having an average TYS of 32.15 ksi (range 31.00-34.16 ksi) with an average UTS-TYS of 3.42 ksi (range 3.08-3.72 ksi) are in group 2. The average UTS of group 2 was 35.57 ksi (range 34.34-37.49 ksi). The material in group 2 lacked sufficient formability to be used in the manufacture of bottles.


Group 3 coils of aluminum sheet had an average TYS of 30.06 ksi (range 28.97-31.23 ksi) and an average UTS-TYS of 3.36 ksi (range 3.02-3.64 ksi). The average UTS of group 3 was 33.41 ksi (range 31.65-34.81 ksi). Of the group 3 coils some were identified as performing with low bottle reject rates after finishing. Some has sufficient formability to be used in the manufacture of bottles.


Coils of aluminum sheet having an average TYS of 29.83 ksi (28.53-31.14 ksi) and an average UTS-TYS of 3.20 ksi (2.99-3.43 ksi) fall in group 4. The average UTS of group 4 was 33.03 ksi (range 31.54-34.51 ksi). Bottles made from coils of aluminum sheet in group 4 with UTS-TYS<3.30 ksi have low reject rates after finishing.


The UTS of groups 1-4 is shown in the graph in FIG. 6. The TYS of groups 1-4 is shown in the graph in FIG. 7. The UTS-TYI of groups 1-4 is shown in the graph in FIG. 8.


The UTS-TYS of a subset of coils from group 3 is plotted against reject rates in FIG. 9. As can be seen in FIG. 9, there is a statistically significant difference in the UTS-TYS for known high reject rate coils and low reject rate coils.


A partition analysis on the reject rate can split the lots into two groups that have the minimal misclassification error at a UTS-TYS value of 3.3. The table below shows the results of the partition analysis of the same data set included in FIG. 9.
















UTS-TYS < 3.3
UTS-TYS >= 3.3




















low reject rate lots
16
2



high reject rate lots
4
21










The rate at which the material work hardens is also critical to form a bottle with lower reject rates. Flow stress for aluminum is often defined by a Voce Equation (σ=A−Bexp(−Cε)) in which the strain hardening rate is defined by the coefficient “C”. Investigation of C values between 5 and 25 resulted in significant bottle forming differences. In some embodiments, a C value in the range of 12-18 can be used to minimize reject rates. In other embodiments a C value in the range of 15-25 can be used. In other embodiments a C value in the range of 20-35 can be used. In other embodiments a C value in the range of 25-50 can be used. In other embodiments a C value in the range of 5-12 can be used.


While various embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail, it is apparent that modifications and adaptations of those embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be expressly understood that such modifications and adaptations are within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: obtaining an aluminum sheet comprising a 3xxx or a 5xxx alloy; wherein the aluminum sheet has a tensile yield strength as measured in the longitudinal direction of 27-33 ksi and an ultimate tensile strength; wherein the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is less than 3.30 ksi (UTS-TYS<3.30 ksi); and wherein the aluminum sheet has a thickness of 0.006 inch to 0.030 inch; drawing and ironing the aluminum sheet to form an aluminum container having a dome;necking the aluminum container to reduce a diameter of a portion of the aluminum container to form a bottle; andfinishing the bottle so as to result in the bottle configured to accept a closure.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the tensile yield strength as measured in the longitudinal direction is 28-32 ksi.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the tensile yield strength as measured in the longitudinal direction is 28.53-31.14 ksi.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is 2.90-3.30 ksi.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the ultimate tensile strength minus the tensile yield strength is 2.99-3.30 ksi.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the aluminum sheet comprises one of AA: 3x03, 3x04 or 3x05.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the aluminum sheet comprises AA 3104.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising expanding a section of the portion of the aluminum container having the reduced diameter.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the section has a length and the length is at least 0.3 inches.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the length is at least 0.4 inches.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the aluminum sheet is a 3xxx alloy.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the 5xxx alloy is a 5043 alloy.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 14/701,154 filed Apr. 30, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/986,692 filed Apr. 30, 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (89)
Number Name Date Kind
872671 Nash Dec 1907 A
1079403 Crecelius Nov 1913 A
1944527 Pfaendler Jan 1934 A
2047076 Kronquest Jul 1936 A
2116199 Heid May 1938 A
2337616 McManus et al. Dec 1943 A
2367300 McManus et al. Jan 1945 A
2649999 Burch Aug 1953 A
2818990 Sommerfield Jan 1958 A
2829802 Pauli Apr 1958 A
2866581 Henchert Dec 1958 A
2965964 Loew Dec 1960 A
3164287 Williamson Jan 1965 A
3518339 Goff Jun 1970 A
3577753 Shah et al. May 1971 A
3696657 Maytag Oct 1972 A
3746198 Howland Jul 1973 A
3845653 Hilgenbrink Nov 1974 A
3919871 Andrasev et al. Nov 1975 A
3924437 Hortig Dec 1975 A
3945231 Imazu et al. Mar 1976 A
3995572 Saunders Dec 1976 A
4148208 Maeder Apr 1979 A
4300375 Maeder et al. Nov 1981 A
4313545 Maeda Feb 1982 A
4431112 Yamaguchi Feb 1984 A
4441354 Bodega Apr 1984 A
4472219 Taira et al. Sep 1984 A
4500575 Taira et al. Feb 1985 A
4554815 Weishalla Nov 1985 A
4610366 Estes et al. Sep 1986 A
4645544 Baba et al. Feb 1987 A
4685322 Clowes Aug 1987 A
4843863 Grims et al. Jul 1989 A
4852377 Mikas et al. Aug 1989 A
4929285 Zaidi May 1990 A
4947627 Scheidegger Aug 1990 A
4964538 Nimmey et al. Oct 1990 A
5009901 Byrne Apr 1991 A
5016463 Johansson et al. May 1991 A
5168742 Heyes et al. Dec 1992 A
5293765 Nussbaum-Pogacnik Mar 1994 A
D346329 Biesecker, II Apr 1994 S
5335532 Mueller et al. Aug 1994 A
5355710 Diekhoff Oct 1994 A
5460024 Meneghin et al. Oct 1995 A
5477722 Dziedzic et al. Dec 1995 A
5503689 Ward Apr 1996 A
5555761 Lavy Sep 1996 A
5557963 Diekhoff Sep 1996 A
5704240 Jordan Jan 1998 A
5718352 Diekhoff Feb 1998 A
5746847 Tanaka et al. May 1998 A
5775160 Fleischer et al. Jul 1998 A
5778723 Diekhoff Jul 1998 A
5822843 Diekhoff et al. Oct 1998 A
5978773 Hudetz et al. Nov 1999 A
6010028 Jordan et al. Jan 2000 A
6199048 Hudetz et al. Mar 2001 B1
7107804 Gong et al. Sep 2006 B2
7337646 Aoyagi et al. Mar 2008 B2
7383209 Hudetz et al. Jun 2008 B2
D608204 Caroen et al. Jan 2010 S
7726165 Myers et al. Jun 2010 B2
7765126 Hudetz et al. Jul 2010 B2
7805970 Woulds Oct 2010 B2
7934410 Myers et al. May 2011 B2
7954354 Myers et al. Jun 2011 B2
8131597 Hudetz et al. Mar 2012 B2
D670167 Winter et al. Nov 2012 S
8322183 Myers et al. Dec 2012 B2
D675527 Rogers et al. Feb 2013 S
8511125 Reimer et al. Aug 2013 B2
D696116 Jacober et al. Dec 2013 S
8683837 Mallory et al. Apr 2014 B2
D722508 Hirsberg Feb 2015 S
D725471 Jacober et al. Mar 2015 S
D725472 Jacober et al. Mar 2015 S
20030046971 Enoki Mar 2003 A1
20040035871 Chupak Feb 2004 A1
20050127077 Chupak Jun 2005 A1
20120043294 Dick et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120227871 Inoue et al. Sep 2012 A1
20140000333 Franham Jan 2014 A1
20140008320 Hosoi Jan 2014 A1
20140298641 Siles et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150314361 Rouns et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150344166 Davis Dec 2015 A1
20160368650 Davis et al. Dec 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (41)
Number Date Country
376464 Nov 1931 BE
19509811 Oct 1997 BR
PI0712097 Dec 2011 BR
PI0713658 Oct 2012 BR
PI0713779 Oct 2012 BR
PI0722419 Dec 2012 BR
P1072242 Nov 2013 BR
2205798 May 1996 CA
2 602 657 Oct 2006 CA
2651778 Nov 2007 CA
2655908 Jan 2008 CA
2655925 Jan 2008 CA
2748426 Jan 2008 CA
2807696 Feb 2012 CA
2 875 031 Dec 2013 CA
101479057 Jul 2009 CN
101479058 Jul 2009 CN
101484256 Jul 2009 CN
101934320 Jan 2011 CN
102581166 Jul 2012 CN
0045115 Feb 1982 EP
0053240 Jun 1982 EP
0079136 May 1983 EP
0121620 Oct 1984 EP
0402006 Dec 1990 EP
0510291 Oct 1992 EP
0549987 Jul 1993 EP
0667193 Aug 1995 EP
1134046 Sep 2001 EP
1461262 Sep 2004 EP
1914024 Apr 2008 EP
1 944 384 Jul 2008 EP
633497 Jan 1928 FR
2688431 Sep 1993 FR
548274 Oct 1942 GB
2112685 Jul 1983 GB
2009-242830 Oct 2009 JP
2009-242831 Oct 2009 JP
2011094185 May 2011 JP
2007136608 Nov 2007 WO
2007124792 Nov 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/IB2015/054061, dated Sep. 22, 2015, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/IB2015/054066, dated Sep. 17, 2015, 11 pages.
Ding, et al., “Processing of AA3004 Alloy Can Stock for Optimum Strength and Formability,” Metallurigical and Materials Transactions, vol. 28A, Dec. 1997, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2015/028583, dated Jul. 17, 2015, 3 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/IB2015/054066, dated Dec. 15, 2016, 8 pages.
“Ball to Manufacture Reclosable Alumi-Tek (TM) Aluminum Beverage Bottles”, Article, PR Newswire, http://www.prnewsire.com/news-releases/ball-to-manufacture-reclosable-akumi-tektm-aluminum-beverage-bottles-56532712.html.
“Tensile Properties and Work Hardening Behavior of Laser-Welded Dual-Phase Steel Joints”, N. Farabi, et al., Jun. 27, 2010, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 21(2) Feb. 2012.
“Constitutive Behavior of As-Cast AA1050, AA3104, and AA5182,” W.M. Van Haaften, et al., Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 33A, Jul. 2012, pp. 1971-1980.
“Alcoa RPD: About Alcoa Rigid Packaging: How aluminum cans are made”, http://www.alcoa.com/rigid_packaging/en/info_page/making_cans.asp#.
“Effect of strain rates on tensile and work hardening properties for Al-Zn magnesium alloys” A L Noradila, et al., IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 46 (2013) 012031.
Callister, William D., Jr., “Materials Science and Engineering, an Introduction,” 2003, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Sixth Edition, p. 746.
International Alloy Designations and Chemical Composition Limits for Wrought Aluminum and Wrought Aluminum Alloys,' Unified North American and International Registration Records, The Aluminum Association, p. 1-36, 2004.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180009022 A1 Jan 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61986692 Apr 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14701154 Apr 2015 US
Child 15713203 US